We investigate the role of nondeterminism in Winfree's abstract Tile Assembly Model (aTAM), which was conceived to model artificial self-assembling systems constructed from DNA. Of particular practical importance is to find tile systems that minimize resources such as the number of distinct tile types, each of which corresponds to a set of DNA strands that must be custom-synthesized in actual implementations of the aTAM. We seek to identify to what extent the use of nondeterminism in tile systems affects the resources required by such shape-building algorithms. We first show a molecular computability theoretic result: there is an infinite shape S that is uniquely assembled by a tile system but not by any deterministic tile system. We then show an analogous phenomenon in the finitary molecular complexity theoretic case: there is a finite shape S that is uniquely assembled by a tile system with c tile types, but every deterministic tile system that uniquely assembles S has more than c tile types. In fact we extend the technique to derive a stronger (classical complexity theoretic) result, showing that the problem of finding the minimum number of tile types that uniquely assemble a given finite shape is Sigma-P-2-complete. In contrast, the problem of finding the minimum number of deterministic tile types that uniquely assemble a shape was shown to be NP-complete by Adleman, Cheng, Goel, Huang, Kempe, Moisset de Espanes, and Rothemund (Combinatorial Optimization Problems in Self-Assembly, STOC 2002). The conclusion is that nondeterminism confers extra power to assemble a shape from a small tile system, but unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses, it is computationally more difficult to exploit this power by finding the size of the smallest tile system, compared to finding the size of the smallest deterministic tile system.
Read full abstract