Tibia Vara Research Articles

Femoral Deformity in Tibia Vara and Its Response to Growth Modulation.

While tibia vara is a disorder of the proximal tibial physis, femoral deformity frequently contributes to the overall limb malalignment. Our purpose was to determine how femoral varus deformity in tibia vara responds to growth modulation, with/without lateral tension band plating (LTBP) to the femur. One-hundred twenty-seven limbs undergoing LTBP for tibia vara were reviewed. All had tibial LTBP and 35 limbs also had femoral LTBP for varus. Radiographs were measured for correction of the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and mechanical axis deviation (MAD). Preoperative-femoral varus was defined with an age-adjusted guide: mLDFA >95 degrees for 2 to below 4 years and mLDFA >90 degrees for 4 to 18 years. The 35 limbs having femoral LTBP were compared with 50 limbs with femoral varus and no femoral LTBP. In addition, 42 limbs that did not have preoperative-femoral varus were followed. Patients with early-onset (below 7y) tibia vara were compared with those with late-onset (≥8y). Outcome success was based on published age-adjusted mLDFA and MAD norms. Following femoral LTBP, the mean mLDFA decreased from 98.0 to 87.1 degrees. All femurs had some improvement, with 28/35 femurs (80%) achieving complete correction. One limb, with late follow-up, overcorrected, requiring reverse (medial) femoral tension band plating.For the 50 limbs with femoral varus and only tibial LTBP, 16/22 limbs (73%) with early-onset and 11/28 limbs (39%) with late-onset completely corrected their femoral deformities. If the limb had preoperative-femoral varus, femoral LTBP statistically correlated with successful mLDFA correction and improvement of MAD, only in the late-onset group.Forty-two limbs, without preoperative-femoral varus, had no change in their mean mLDFA of 87 degrees. However, 4 femurs (10%) ended with posttreatment varus. Femoral LTBP is effective in correcting femoral varus deformity in the tibia vara. For femoral varus associated with late-onset tibia vara, femoral LTBP should be considered. Those that had femoral LTBP had statistically more successful femoral and overall limb varus correction. However, in early-onset tibia vara, with associated femoral varus, observation is warranted because 73% of femurs are corrected without femoral intervention. This study was underpowered to show additional improvement with femoral LTBP in the early-onset group. Even limbs with normal femoral alignment, should be observed closely for the development of femoral varus, during tibial LTBP treatment for tibia vara. Level III.

The transphyseal osteotomy for the slipped proximal tibial epiphysis in tibia vara.

This study aimed to describe a novel transphyseal osteotomy (TPO) for acute deformity correction in children with bilateral tibia vara and the atraumatic 'slipped proximal tibial epiphysis' (SPTE) entity. We described the clinical and radiological findings in five children (10 limbs) with tibia vara that were treated with the TPO. The criteria for the SPTE were met in nine (9/10) cases. The surgical technique and short-term results of the TPO are reported. The median age was 9 years (range, 6-9), with obesity (BMI > 95th centile) present in all children. The medial tibial plateau was not significantly depressed (the median angle of depression of the medial plateau measured 30° (range, 20°-32°). The mean medial proximal tibial angle of 33° (range, 8°-71°) was corrected to 82° (range, 77°-86°), the mean anatomic posterior proximal tibial angle of 48° (range, 32°-70°) was corrected to 72° (range, 61°-86°), and the median internal tibial rotation of 45° (range, 20°-50° internal rotation) was corrected to neutral rotation (range, 10° internal-10° external rotation). There were two complications: one case of recurrent deformity and one case of intra-articular extension of the osteotomy. We describe a novel TPO that aims to simultaneously correct all aspects of the deformity, stabilise the physis, and prevent recurrence through epiphysiodesis. Further research is required to determine its efficacy and safety. The atraumatic SPTE appears to represent a specific morphological presentation in tibia vara. Level of evidence: 4.

Impact of Proximal Tibial Varus Anatomy on Survivorship After Medial Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundPrecise indications for medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) continue to be defined. It is unclear if patients who have proximal tibia vara should be considered candidates for UKA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of proximal tibial varus alignment on outcomes after UKA. MethodsA retrospective review identified 2,416 patients (3,029 knees) who underwent mobile-bearing medial UKA with 2-year minimum follow-up or revision. Preoperative radiographs were evaluated, and medial proximal tibial angle (mPTA) was measured. Patients were grouped into two groups as follows: mPTA <80 degrees and mPTA ≥80 degrees. Analyses were performed on the impact of mPTA on clinical outcomes, all-cause revisions, and tibial failures. ResultsAt a mean follow-up of 5 years (range, 0.5 years to 12.8 years), there was not a statistically significant difference in clinical outcomes nor increased risk for all-cause revision or tibial failure in patients who had an mPTA <80°. Mean mPTA in patients who had tibial failures was 82.5° and not significantly different than those who did not have a tibial failure (82.9°) (P = .289). Tibial failure rate in knees with an mPTA <80° was 2.2% and not significantly different than knees with an mPTA ≥80° at 1.4% (P = .211). The all-cause revision rate in knees with an mPTA <80° was 5.8% and was not significantly different than knees with an mPTA ≥80° at 4.9% (P = .492). ConclusionPatients who have tibia vara are not at increased risk for tibial related or all-cause failure in medial UKA. This data may allow surgeons to increase their indications for medial UKA.

Managing Genu Varum in Adolescents to Reduce Risks of Progression to Knee Osteoarthrosis

Introduction: Genu varum is not uncommon in adolescents. Managing the condition to reduce its progression may decrease the prevalence of incident knee osteoarthrosis in adulthood. The present review examines studies on risk factors contributing to the progression of genu varum and associated with the degeneration of the medial tibiofemoral joint. We proposed approaches to decrease the magnitude of genu varum and external knee adduction moment, to reduce the incidence of knee osteoarthrosis in the aged population. Methods and Materials: Literature searches were conducted in Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Systematic Reviews, using keywords individually and in combinations. We excluded papers on pathological genu varum, tibia vara, Blount disease, nutritional rickets, imaging, and surgery and included only articles on genu varum involving children and young adults. Reference lists of the included papers were also screened manually for additional references. Results and Discussion: Search results showed that many children with physiologic genu varum are deficient or insufficient in vitamin D. High-impact exercises in late children and adolescents promote genu varum. In contrast, therapeutic exercises reduce the magnitude of genu varum in young adults with postural bowlegs. Lateral wedge insoles decrease the external knee adduction moment. We proposed to check the serum vitamin D level of children and adolescents with genu varum. Growing children with genu varum should be advised to reduce the frequency of performing high-impact exercises. Adolescents with genu varum should strengthen the external hip rotators and use lateral wedged insoles.

The Relationships between Ankle Kinematics during Running and Static Ankle Measurements in Youth Soccer Players

Lateral ankle sprain (LAS) is the most common injury in youth soccer. The mechanisms of LAS should be identified to develop effective injury prevention programs. Alignment and range of motion (ROM) are considered factors affecting kinematics during movement. Therefore, this study was designed to identify whether static measurements, including alignment and ROM, affect ankle kinematics related to LAS during running in youth soccer players. For this study, 100 participants were recruited. Data on rearfoot angle in the prone position (PRA), tibial varum, weight-bearing lunge test (WBLT), passive eversion, passive inversion (PIN), and ankle kinematics during running of all participants were collected. Ankle kinematics were computed for dorsiflexion at the initial contact (IC), inversion at IC, maximum dorsiflexion (MDF), and maximum inversion (MIN). Stepwise multiple regressions were conducted with an alpha level of 0.05. PRA, WBLT, and PIN significantly predicted dorsiflexion at IC (R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 0.144, P &lt; 0.001), and PRA was a significant predictor on inversion at IC (R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 0.227, P &lt; 0.001). PRA and WBLT were significant predictors on MDF (R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 0.330, P &lt; 0.001), and PRA significantly predicted MIN (R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 0.188, P &lt; 0.001). Of significant predictors, only WBLT can be treated by joint mobilization. Thus, WBLT related to pronation, which makes the ankle in a closed-packed position, should be treated to increase DF ROM and ankle stability. In addition, low-speed running video analysis might be useful in screening for ankle malalignment.

The Lateral Malleolus Is a Simple and Reliable Landmark that Can Be Used to Reliably Perform Restricted Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty-Anatomical and Clinical Studies in Japanese Population.

In restricted kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty (TKA), bone resection is performed within a safe range to help protect against failure from extreme alignments. Patient-specific instrumentation, navigations, and robotics are often required for restricting bone cuts within a specified safe zone. We hypothesized that the lateral malleolus could be used as a landmark for restricting the tibial osteotomy using a mechanical jig. Here, we examine its feasibility in anatomical and clinical settings. We studied long-leg standing radiographs of 114 consecutive patients (228 knees) who underwent knee arthroplasty in our institution. We measured the lateral malleolus angle (LMA), the angle between the tibial axis and the line between the center of the knee and the lateral surface of the lateral malleolus. The medial proximal tibial angle was also measured before and after restricted kinematic alignment TKA under restriction with reference to the lateral malleolus. Mean LMA was 5.5 ± 0.5 degrees. This was relatively consistent and independent of patient's height, weight, and body mass index. The lateral malleolus is a reliable bone landmark that can be used to recognize approximately 5.5 degrees of varus intraoperatively. A surgeon can use this as a restriction of the tibial varus cut up to 6 degrees without the requirement for expensive assistive technologies.

Lower Extremity Malformations.

Lower Extremity Malformations.

Image-based robotic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty allowed to match the rotation of the tibial implant with the native kinematic knee alignment.

Image-based robotic tools improve the accuracy of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) positioning, but few studies have examined its effect on axial alignment. The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics of tibial and femoral implant positioning, mainly the tibial rotation, during medial or lateral UKA, performed with an image-based robotic assisted system. A total of 71 UKA performed between September 2021 and June 2022 (53 medial and 18 lateral) were analyzed. All data regarding implant positioning (rotation, coronal and sagittal alignment) for tibial and femoral components were obtained using MAKO® software (Stryker®, Mahwah, USA) intra-operatively. The lateral UKA had a mean internal tibial rotation of 15.4 ± 3°, a mean external femoral rotation of 0.96 ± 2.4°, and a mean tibial slope of 4.7 ± 1.3°. The medial UKA had a mean internal tibial rotation of 0.18 ± 2.7°, a mean internal femoral rotation of 0.35 ± 2.2°, and a mean tibial slope of 5.4 ± 1.3°. The tibial rotations, femoral valgus, tibial varus and tibial size significantly differed between medial and lateral UKA (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in femoral rotation, flexion, femoral size, slope, and polyethylene thickness between medial and lateral UKA. Medial and lateral UKA had significantly different implantation characteristics related to the biomechanics of the knee compartments. Image-based robotic UKA allowed precise femorotibial positioning per-operatively to match native kinematic alignment.

Better accuracy and implant survival in medial imageless robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: two- to eleven-year follow-up of three hundred fifty-six consecutive knees.

Implant malpositioning, joint line (JL) lowering, and malalignment have been identified as risk factors for implant failure in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The aims of this study were to compare the accuracy of implant positioning in robotic-assisted UKA versus conventional UKA in a large cohort and examine the correlation with implant survival at mid-term follow-up. This retrospective study included 356 medial UKAs from 2011 to 2019. The radiological measurements performed were coronal positioning of tibial implant according to Cartier angle (Δ Cartier), posterior tibial slope (PTS), residual hip-knee-ankle (HKA), and JL restoration. Outliers were defined as follows: post-operative HKA < 175° or > 180°, Δ Cartier > 3° or < - 3°, JL change ≥ 2mm, and PTS < 2° or > 8°. The survival probability was reported at the last follow-up. Out of the 356 knees included, 159 underwent conventional UKA (44.5%) and 197 (55.5%) robotic-assisted UKA. The mean follow-up was 61.3months ± 24.0. Robotic UKA was associated with better accuracy compared to conventional UKA in relation to HKA (67% vs 56%, p = 0.023), JL restoration (70% vs 44%, p < 0.0001), PTS (83% vs 55%, p < 0.0001), and tibial varus restoration (65% vs 55%, p = 0.049). Implant survival in the robotic group was found to be superior at the last follow-up (96.4% versus 87.3% at 9years, p = 0.004). Robotic assistance in patients undergoing medial UKA was associated with better accuracy compared to conventional UKA with respect to tibial implant positioning, post-operative limb alignment, and JL restoration. This was translated in improved survival at mid-term follow-up favouring the robotic group.

Precise Patellar Tendon Insertion Protection and Osteotomy Surface Advantage of Transtibial Tuberosity-High Tibial Osteotomy.

Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is successful in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis with medial compartment stenosis and tibial varus deformity, but patella infera is the main complication. This study aims to design a new medial tibial open osteotomy scheme, transtibial tuberosity-high tibial osteotomy (TT-HTO), which can fully protect the patellar tendon insertion. In addition, the area of the osteotomy surface and wedge volume were evaluated in TT-HTO, biplanar distal tibial tuberosity osteotomy (biplanar-DTO), and uniplanar-DTO to evaluate the potential advantages of this technology in bone healing. The tibial tubercle was divided into four equal sections from proximal to distal, which were defined as zones A, B, C, and D. From September to December 2020, the imaging examinations of 200 patients (95 males and 105 females) with a mean age of 40.6 years (range 19-60 years) were evaluated to observe the zonation of the tibial tubercle where the insertion of the patellar tendon is located. Then, 59 patients (23 males and 36 females) with a mean age 59.6 years (range 43-77 years), for a total of 69 knees (32 right and 37 left), who underwent routine knee surgery were observed and verified. According to the position of the patellar tendon insertion, TT-HTO was designed. Fifteen tibial sawbones were divided equally into three groups: TT-HTO; biplanar-DTO; and uniplanar-DTO. The total area of the osteotomy surface was compared using the graph paper method. The wedge volume at wedge heights of 10 mm was compared among osteotomy types using the plasticine Archimedes principle. One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare the total area of the osteotomy surface and the wedge volume. The osteotomy line of TT-HTO passes through the boundary point of zones B and C of the tibial tubercle to fully protect the insertion point of the patellar tendon. The total area of the osteotomy surface in TT-HTO and biplanar-DTO was significantly larger than that in uniplanar-DTO (P < 0.05). The wedge volume in uniplanar-DTO was significantly smaller than that in TT-HTO and biplanar-DTO (P < 0.05). No significant differences in the osteotomy surface and the wedge volume were identified between TT-HTO and biplanar-DTO. TT-HTO can protect the patellar tendon insertion and avoid postoperative patella infera. The osteotomy surface is large and located in an area of cancellous bone, which ensures its good healing characteristics.

Pre-Surgery Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle and Weightbearing Line Percentage Are Nearly Perfectly Correlated to the Miniaci Angle When Planning Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomies

To investigate the conversion formulas between the Miniaci angle, presurgery parameters, and changes in presurgery parameters in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO), including hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, weightbearing line (WBL) percentage, mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), ΔHKA angle, ΔWBL percentage, ΔmMPTA, and other parameters. From January 2012 to December 2019, 247 lower limbs of 144 patients with medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis combined with proximal tibia vara were enrolled. Inclusion criteria were adults, medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis, Kellgren-Lawrence classification grade ≤ III, mMPTA ≤ 85°, normal mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (85°-90°), and patella facing anterior in the bipedal standing position. Exclusion criteria were history of fracture, trauma, or orthopaedic surgery; developmental dysplasia of the hip or femoral head necrosis; femoral bowing deformity; deformity of the tibial shaft; and leg length discrepancy. Using standing whole-leg radiographs, an OWHTO simulation was performed to determine the Miniaci angle by delivering the WBL to the Fujisawa point. The relationship of the Miniaci angle, the presurgery parameters, and the changes in presurgery parameters were analyzed by Spearman's correlation and linear regression analyses. The relationship between the postsurgery HKA angle and presurgery parameters was analyzed by multiple linear regression model. The Miniaci angle showed a near-perfect correlation with the presurgery HKA angle (y=-1.05x+ 192.10, r2= 0.99), presurgery WBL percentage (y=-0.25x+ 15.14, r2= 0.97), ΔHKA angle (y= 1.04x- 0.03, r2= 1.00), ΔWBL percentage (y= 0.25x- 0.52, r2= 0.97), and ΔmMPTA (y= 1.04x- 0.03, r2= 1.00). The ΔHKA angle showed nearly perfect correlation with the ΔmMPTA (y= 1.00x, r2= 1.00), and ΔWBL percentage (y= 0.24x- 0.47, r2= 0.97). The presurgery HKA angle, presurgery WBL percentage, ΔHKA angle, ΔWBL, and ΔmMPTA percentage are nearly perfectly correlated to the Miniaci angle, whereas the ΔmMPTA and ΔWBL percentage are nearly perfectly correlated to the ΔHKA angle. With the conversion formulas determined in the current study, surgeons can calculate the Miniaci angle based on the presurgery parameters without the assistance of digital software for complex surgical simulation. The Miniaci angle is closely related to the gap of the medial opening wedge. Based on the Miniaci angle and the depth of the osteotomy, surgeons can calculate the gap required before surgery using trigonometric functions and then simply measure the gap during surgery.

Can the MRI based AMADEUS score accurately assess pre-surgery chondral defect severity according to the ICRS arthroscopic classification system?

PurposeThe AMADEUS (Area Measurement And DEpth and Underlying Structures) scoring and grading system has been proposed for the MRI based evaluation of untreated focal chondral defects around the knee. The clinical practicability, its correlation with arthroscopically assessed grading systems (ICRS – International Cartilage Repair Society) and thereby its clinical value in terms of decision making and guiding prognosis was yet to determine.MethodsFrom 2008 to 2019 a total of 89 individuals were indicated for high tibial valgus osteotomy (HTO) due to tibial varus deformity and concomitant chondral defects of the medial compartment of the knee. All patients received a preoperative MRI (1.5 Tesla or 3.0 Tesla) and pre-osteotomy diagnostic arthroscopy. Chondral defects of the medial compartment were scored and graded with the MRI based AMADEUS by three independent raters and compared to arthroscopic defect grading by the ICRS system. Interrater and intrarater reliability as well as correlation analysis with the ICRS classification system were assessed.ResultsIntraclass correlation coefficients for the various subscores of the AMADEUS showed an overall good to excellent interrater agreement (min: 0.26, max: 0.80). Intrarater agreement turned out to be substantially inferior (min: 0.08, max: 0.53). Spearman correlation revealed an overall moderate correlative association of the AMADEUS subscores with the ICRS classification system, apart from the defect area subscore. Sensitivity of the AMADEUS to accurately identify defect severity according to the ICRS was 0.7 (0.69 for 3.0 Tesla MRI, 0.67 for 1.5 Tesla MRI). The mean AMADEUS grade was 2.60 ± 0.81 and the mean ICRS score 2.90 ± 0.63.ConclusionsOverall, the AMADEUS with all its subscores shows moderate correlation with the arthroscopic chondral grading system according to ICRS. This suggests that chondral defect grading by means of the MRI based AMADEUS is well capable of influencing and guiding treatment decisions. Interrater reliability shows overall good agreement.

Guided Growth for Varus Deformity Following Early Tibial Osteotomy in Infantile Tibia Vara-A Multi-Center Study.

Despite early osteotomy, many patients with infantile tibia vara (ITV) have persistent or recurrent varus deformity and disordered growth at the medial proximal tibial physis. Our hypothesis was that lateral tibial tension band plating (LTTBP) could guide correction. A retrospective review at 6 centers of 15 patients (16 extremities) was performed of LTTBP for varus deformity following early osteotomy in ITV, diagnosed≤4years of age. Correction of deformity parameters on digital standing anteroposterior lower extremity radiographs determined outcome. Twenty-two LTTBP procedures were performed at mean age of 7.5 years, including 4 revisions for implant failure and 2 reimplantations for recurrence. Single event LLTBP, improved the medial proximal tibial angle with a mean change of 13.4 degrees (0.39 degrees/month). Eleven limbs had preoperative mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA)>90 degrees. While n degree femoral procedures were performed, at study end, 11 femurs had mechanical lateral distal femoral angle≤90°. Pretreatment, 13 extremities had mechanical axis zone (MAZone) III varus (81%) and 3 had MAZone II varus (19%). LTTBP's were able to initially correct 13 limbs to MAZone I or valgus but 4 limbs rebounded to MAZone II varus after implant removal. Final limb alignment, after all surgeries and rebound, included 9 in MAZone I, 5 in MAZone II varus and 2 in MAZone III varus. Average follow-up was 3.0 years at mean 10.7 years of age. Fifteen procedures resulted in improvement in MAZone and 7 had no change. On average, those that improved were younger (7.3 vs. 8.0y), weighed less (45.5kg with body mass index 26.5kg/m 2 vs. 67.8kg and body mass index 35.7kg/m 2 ), had lower mechanical axis deviation (37.1mm vs. 43.9mm), lower medial physeal slope (61.7 vs. 68.7 degrees) and had a higher percentage of open triradiate phases (87 vs. 57%). LTTBP for residual varus, after initial osteotomy in ITV, resulted in 81% of limbs initially achieving MAZone I or valgus with implant failure revisions and femoral remodeling. Rebound after implant removal reduced the corrected rate to 56%. Ninety-four percent avoided osteotomy during the study period. IV.

Intraoperative joint balancing procedure using an imageless robotic assisted technique does not necessarily result in kinematically aligned bicruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

The primary aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the hip- knee- ankle. (HKA) angle and prosthetic alignment with three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT) measurements in patients who underwent robotic-assisted (RA) TKA, with consideration of the soft tissue envelope via an intraoperative joint-balancing procedure. We hypothesized that intraoperative consideration of soft tissue laxity in individual patients using imageless RA technology will not necessarily result in kinematically aligned bicruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty (KA TKA). This retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent RA TKA between 2019 and 2020. The indication for TKA was varus osteoarthritis of the knee. During this period, 60 RA bi-cruciate stabilized TKAs were performed. Prosthetic alignments were measured using computer software with 3DCT. We determined prosthetic positioning and bone resection volume with consideration of the soft tissue envelope using an intraoperative full range of motion joint-balancing procedure during RA TKA. 3DCT scans of the entire lower extremity were taken before and after surgery. Postoperative varus HKA alignment occurred in 58% of patients who underwent RA TKA, 31% of knees were in femoral valgus alignment and tibial varus alignment, and 42% had femoral components in internal rotation among knees with femoral valgus alignment and tibial varus alignment. The mean thickness of the osteotomized medial and lateral posterior condyles of the femur were 11.2 and 9.1mm, respectively, based on 3DCT measurements. Intraoperative consideration of soft tissue laxity in individual patientsusing an imageless RA technique does not necessarily result in KA bicruciate TKA.

What Is the Alignment and Balance of a Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed Using a Calipered Kinematic Alignment Technique?

We simulated calipered kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty (cKATKA) using alignment data and ligament tensions acquired during 607 consecutive robotic-assisted TKAs performed using a dynamic ligament tensor. The distal femur was resected parallel to the native joint line accounting for cartilage loss. The proximal tibial resection necessary to achieve extension gap balance was calculated for each knee. Similarly, symmetric posterior condylar resections prescribed by this method were simulated and the tibial resection needed to achieve a balanced flexion gap calculated. Finally, the resultant limb alignment and degree of joint balance in both flexion and extension of each knee were determined and categorized according to the preoperative knee alignment. Increasing preoperative varus deformity required a greater tibial varus cut to achieve a balanced extension gap (P < .0001). There was no correlation between tibial varus angle and flexion gap balance (P > .1). For mild varus deformities 81% and 95% of knees could be balanced and have an overall limb alignment within 3° and 5° from the mechanical axis respectively. For knees with moderate-severe varus, only 37% and 74% could be balanced within these alignment boundaries (P < .01). Overall, 95% of these simulated knees could be balanced with an overall alignment within 0° ± 5°. However, 50% of the simulated TKAs had looser medial gaps in flexion compared to the lateral gap. Application of the cKATKA method can yield TKAs within 0° ± 5° of mechanical axis alignment by simply adjusting the proximal tibial resection without ligament releases. However, an undesirable flexion gap balance was predicted in nearly 50% of the TKAs.

Predictive Gap-balancing Reduces the Extent of Soft-tissue Adjustment Required After Bony Resection in Robot-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty—A Comparison With Simulated Measured Resection

BackgroundTo understand the extent and frequency of soft-tissue adjustment required to achieve mediolateral (ML) balance in measured resection (MR) vs gap-balancing (GB) total knee arthroplasty, this study compared ML balance and joint laxity throughout flexion between the 2 techniques. The precision of predictive GB in achieving ML balance and laxity was also assessed. MethodsTwo surgeons performed 95 robot-assisted GB total knee arthroplasties with predictive balancing, limiting tibial varus to 3° and adjusting femoral positioning to optimize balance. A robotic ligament tensioner measured joint laxity. Planned MR (pMR) was simulated by applying neutral tibial and femoral coronal resections and 3° of external femoral rotation. ML balance, laxity, component alignment, and resection depths were compared between planned GB (pGB) and pMR. ML balance and laxity were compared between pGB and final GB (fGB). ResultsThe proportion of knees with >2 mm of ML imbalance in flexion or extension ranged from 3% to 18% for pGB vs 50% to 53% for pMR (P < .001). Rates of ML imbalance >3 mm ranged from 0% to 9% for pGB and 30% to 38% for MR (P < .001). The mean pMR laxity was 1.9 mm tighter medially and 1.1 mm tighter laterally than pGB throughout flexion. The mean fGB laxity was greater than the mean pGB laxity by 0.5 mm medially and 1.2 mm laterally (P < .001). ConclusionMR led to tighter joints than GB, with ML gap imbalances >3 mm in 30% of knees. GB planning improved ML balance throughout flexion but increased femoral posterior rotation variability and bone resection compared to MR. fGB laxity was likely not clinically significantly different than pGB.

Does Kinematic Alignment Increase Polyethylene Wear Compared With Mechanically Aligned Components? A Wear Simulation Study.

Kinematic alignment is an alternative approach to mechanical alignment. Kinematic alignment can restore the joint line to its prearthritic condition, and its advocates have suggested it may be associated with other benefits. But this alignment approach often results in tibial components that are placed in varus and femoral components that are placed in valgus alignment, which may result in an increased risk of component loosening because of wear. Like malaligned implant components, kinematically aligned knee implants could increase wear in vivo, but we lack comparative data about wear behavior between these approaches. (1) Do the different alignment approaches (kinematic, mechanical, and purposefully malaligned components) result in different wear rates in a wear simulator? (2) Do the different alignment approaches lead to different worn areas on the polyethylene inserts in a wear simulator? (3) Do the different alignment approaches result in different joint kinematics in a wear simulator? Mechanical alignment was simulated in a force-controlled manner with a virtual ligament structure according to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO 14243-1) using a knee wear simulator. To simulate kinematic alignment, flexion-extension motion, internal-external torque, and the joint line were tilted by 4°, using a novel mechanical setup, without changing the force axis. The setup includes bearings with inclinations of 4° so that the joint axis of 4° is determined. To verify the angle of 4°, a digital spirit level was used. To simulate malalignment, we tilted the implant and, therefore, the joint axis by 4° using a wedge with an angle of 4° without tilting the torque axes of the simulator. This leads to a purposefully malaligned tibial varus and femoral valgus of 4°. For each condition, three cruciate-retaining knee implants were tested for 3.0 x 10 6 cycles, and one additional implant was used as soak control. Gravimetric wear analyses were performed every 0.5 x 10 6 cycles to determine the linear wear rate of each group by linear regression. The wear area was measured after 3.0 x 10 6 cycles by outlining the worn areas on the polyethylene inserts, then photographing the inserts and determining the worn areas using imaging software. The joint kinematics (AP translation and internal-external rotation) were recorded by the knee simulator software and analyzed during each of the six simulation intervals. Comparing the wear rates of the different groups, no difference could be found between the mechanical alignment and the kinematic alignment (3.8 ± 0.5 mg/million cycles versus 4.1 ± 0.2 mg/million cycles; p > 0.99). However, there was a lower wear rate in the malaligned group (2.7 ± 0.2 mg/million cycles) than in the other two groups (p < 0.01). When comparing the total wear areas of the polyethylene inserts among the three different alignment groups, the lowest worn area could be found for the malaligned group (716 ± 19 mm 2 ; p ≤ 0.003), but there was no difference between kinematic alignment and mechanical alignment (823 ± 19 mm 2 versus 825 ± 26 mm 2 ; p > 0.99). Comparing the AP translation, no difference was found between the mechanical alignment, the kinematic alignment, and the malalignment group (6.6 ± 0.1 mm versus 6.9 ± 0.2 mm versus 6.8 ± 0.3 mm; p = 0.06). In addition, the internal-external rotation between mechanical alignment, kinematic alignment, and malalignment also revealed no difference (9.9° ± 0.4° versus 10.2° ± 0.1° versus 10.1° ± 0.6°; p = 0.44). In the current wear simulation study, the wear rates of mechanical alignment and kinematic alignment of 4° were in a comparable range. The results suggest that kinematic alignment with up to 4° of component inclination may give the surgeon confidence that the reconstruction will have good wear-related performance when using a modern cruciate-retaining implant. The malaligned group had the lowest wear rate, which may be a function of the smaller worn area on the inserts compared with the other two alignment groups. This smaller articulation area between the femoral condyles and polyethylene insert could increase the risk of delamination of malaligned components over longer test durations and during high-load activities. For that reason, and because malalignment can cause nonwear-related revisions, malalignment should be avoided. Further in vitro and clinical studies must prove whether the wear simulation of different alignments can predict the wear behavior in vivo.

An anatomo-functional implant positioning technique with robotic assistance for primary TKA allows the restoration of the native knee alignment and a natural functional ligament pattern, with a faster recovery at 6months compared to an adjusted mechanical technique.

An anatomo-functional implant positioning (AFIP) technique in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) could restore physiological ligament balance (symmetric gap in extension, asymmetric gap in flexion). The purposes were to compare (1) ligament balancing in extension and flexion after TKA in the AFIP group, (2) TKA alignment, implant positioning and patellar tracking between AFIP and adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA) techniques, (3) clinical outcomes between both groups at 12months. All robotic-assisted TKA with an AFIP technique were included (n = 40). Exclusion criteria were genu valgum (HKA angle > 183°), extra-articular deformity more than 10°, and patellar maltracking (high-grade J-sign). One control patient with a TKA implanted by an aMA technique was matched for each case, based on age, body mass index, sex, and knee alignment. Ligament balancing (medial and lateral gaps in millimeters) in full extension and at 90° of flexion after TKA in the AFIP group was assessed with the robotic system. TKA alignment (HKA angle), implants positioning (femoral and tibial coronal axis, tibial slope, joint-line orientation), patellar tracking (patellar tilt and translation) and the Knee Society Score (KSS) at 6 and 12months were compared between both groups. The ligament balancing was compared using a t test for paired samples in the AFIP group. The radiographic measurements and KSS scores were compared between groups using a t test for independent samples. In the AFIP group, there was no significant difference between the medial and lateral gap laxity in extension (NS). A significant opening of the lateral gap was observed in flexion compared to extension (mean: + 2.9mm; p < 0.0001). The mean postoperative HKA angle was comparable between both groups (177.3° ± 2.1 in the AFIP group vs 176.8° ± 3.2; NS). In the AFIP group, the femoral anatomy was restored (90.9° ± 1.6) and the tibial varus was partially corrected (87.4° ± 1.8). The improvement of Knee and Function KSS at 6months was better in the AFIP group (59.3 ± 11.9 and 51.7 ± 20, respectively, versus 49.3 ± 9.7 and 20.8 ± 13; p < 0.001). The AFIP concept allowed the restoration of the native knee alignment and a natural functional ligament pattern. With a more physiological target for ligament balancing, the AFIP technique had equivalent clinical outcomes at 12months compared to aMA, with a faster recovery. III retrospective therapeutic case control series.

Prevalence of proximal tibia vara in Indonesian population with knee osteoarthritis

BackgroundProximal tibia vara has drawn interest since the concept of constitutional varus was introduced. Proximal tibia vara is a condition where the knee varus tilt the tibia condyle medially and shift the tibial articular surface medially. This condition affects medial proximal tibial angle measurements and the placement of the tibial implant in knee replacement surgery. Thus, it challenged the neutral knee arthroplasty alignment target because some people may present a proximal tibia vara. This study assesses the prevalence of the proximal tibia vara and the correlation to knee osteoarthritis grade. MethodsThis retrospective study was carried out from January 2021 to June 2021. Eighty-five limbs were included with the following inclusion criteria: knee osteoarthritis patients who received a long view lower extremity radiograph. The exclusions criteria were (1) patients who had undergone arthroplasty and lower extremity surgery before and (2) valgus knee deformity. The outcomes in this study were HKAA, MAD, TAD, MPTA, PTRP, LDFA, and PTS. Intraclass correlation (ICC) using two-way mixed was used to assess the reproducibility of the radiographic parameters. Multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate the correlation between knee osteoarthritis grade and radiographs parameters (MAD and TAD). ResultA total 85 limbs from 52 patients were assessed in this study. Proximal tibia vara was found in 18 knees (21%.). The logistic regression was performed to assess the correlation between the severity of the knee osteoarthritis and radiographic parameters (MAD, TAD, LDFA, and PTS) with an overall p-value < 0.001 and pseudo-R2 = 0.29. ConclusionA significant portion of patients with knee osteoarthritis have proximal tibia vara, and it is a pre-existing condition. Since the pre-existing proximal tibia vara affects preoperative measurements, a long-standing lower extremity x-ray is recommended to be obtained as part of knee replacement preparation.

Osteotomy close to the knee joint in adults

Osteotomy close to the knee joint in cases of axial deformities or in the context of corrective interventions is still an elementary component of the spectrum of orthopedic surgery. The precise localization and analysis of the pathology are crucial in order to restore approximate physiological loading conditions by means of asuitable osteotomy procedure. Thus, above all, the medial open-wedge tibial osteotomy has become established as astandard procedure for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis caused by extra-articular tibial varus deformity. Furthermore, corrective osteotomy of the sagittal axis of the tibia and of the distal femur also show good long-term results when the indications are correctly interpreted. The osteotomies described in this article are corrections that should be performed after careful consideration of the biological and mechanical aspects. Correct planning, attention to risk factors and the surgical technique are the main factors that determine the long-term success of the procedure.