Tibial Coronal Alignment Research Articles

Comparison between navigated reported position and postoperative computed tomography to evaluate accuracy in a robotic navigation system in total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundComputer navigation increases reproducibility compared to non-navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Robotics navigation is a branch of computer navigation technology that might further improve accuracy of implant placement. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy achieved in TKA with a robotic navigation system. MethodsOne hundred seventy three knees. System studied: Omni navigation System (OMNI, Raynham, MA). Navigated femoral and tibial cuts were compared to postoperative computed tomography (CT). Measurements reviewed: femoral coronal alignment (FCA), femoral sagittal alignment (FSA), femoral rotational alignment (FRA), tibial coronal alignment (TCA), tibial sagittal alignment (TSA) and hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle. Statistical analysis was made using R. ResultsThe mean differences between the navigated reported and the CT positions were: FCA: 0.1 ± 1.2° more varus (P = 0.58), FSA: 1.5 ± 0.3° more flexed (P < 0.001), FRA: 0.0 ± 1.7° (P = 0.93), TCA: 0.7 ± 1.1° more varus (P < 0.001), TSA: −1.3 ± 1.5 more negative slope (P < 0.001), HKA angle: 0.4 ± 2.4 more varus (P < 0.049).The percentages of concordance inside a three degree difference were: FCA: 98% (169 knees), FSA: 100% (173 knees), FRA: 94% (162 knees), TCA: 99% (171 knees), TSA: 93% (161 knees) and HKA angle: 83% (144 knees). ConclusionsThe current study showed that the robotic navigation system studied is highly accurate regarding final implant positioning for FCA, FRA and TCA. It has less accuracy in FSA, TSA and the HKA angle.

Pas de supériorité d’un système de navigation portable par accéléromètre par rapport à une technique conventionnelle en arthroplastie totale du genou: revue systématique et méta-analyse de la littérature

BackgroundPrecise implant alignment is a crucial prognostic factor in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Portable navigation systems (PN-TKA) were reported to be better than the conventional technique (CON-TKA). We hypothesized that PN-TKA offered greater radiologic precision than CON-TKA in mechanically aligning components. We investigated whether (1) it improved global mechanical alignment, and (2) optimized component placement with respect to the tibial and femoral mechanical axes. Patients and methodsA systematic literature review compared PN-TKA versus CON-TKA. PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library search retrieved ten studies. Their data were pooled using RevMan 5.3. Odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous data were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each outcome. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed as I2 using a standard χ2 test. I2>50% denoted significant heterogeneity requiring a random effects model; otherwise, a fixed effects model was applied. ResultsThere were significantly fewer outliers for mechanical axis (I2=24%, OR=0.62, 95% CI=0.42–0.91, p=0.02) and coronal femoral component angle (I2=58%, OR=0.31, 95% CI=0.13–0.73, p=0.007) using PN-TKA; however, no significant difference was observed for coronal tibial component angle outliers (I2=0%, OR=0.66, 95% CI=0.38–1.15, p=0.14). DiscussionAlthough PN-TKA appeared to improve global alignment, it had no effect on coronal tibial alignment, which is a key factor in predicting the long-term success of component fixation. There thus appeared to be no definite advantage of PN-TKA over CON-TKA. Level of evidenceIII.

No definite advantage of a portable accelerometer-based navigation system over conventional technique in total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundPrecise implant alignment is a crucial prognostic factor in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Portable navigation systems (PN-TKA) were reported to be better than the conventional technique (CON-TKA). We hypothesized that PN-TKA offered greater radiologic precision than CON-TKA in mechanically aligning components. We investigated whether (1) it improved global mechanical alignment, and (2) optimized component placement with respect to the tibial and femoral mechanical axes. Patients and methodsA systematic literature review compared PN-TKA versus CON-TKA. PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library search retrieved ten studies. Their data were pooled using RevMan 5.3. Odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous data were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each outcome. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed as I2 using a standard χ2 test. I2>50% denoted significant heterogeneity requiring a random effects model; otherwise, a fixed effects model was applied. ResultsThere were significantly fewer outliers for mechanical axis (I2=24%, OR=0.62, 95% CI=0.42–0.91, p=0.02) and coronal femoral component angle (I2=58%, OR=0.31, 95% CI=0.13–0.73, p=0.007) using PN-TKA; however, no significant difference was observed for coronal tibial component angle outliers (I2=0%, OR=0.66, 95% CI=0.38–1.15, p=0.14). DiscussionAlthough PN-TKA appeared to improve global alignment, it had no effect on coronal tibial alignment, which is a key factor in predicting the long-term success of component fixation. There thus appeared to be no definite advantage of PN-TKA over CON-TKA. Level of evidenceIII.

Highly variable coronal tibial and femoral alignment in osteoarthritic knees: a systematic review.

There is a lack of knowledge about coronal alignment variability in osteoarthritic knees. Therefore, the purpose of this article was to systematically review the literature and collect data about the lower limb alignment including hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), femoral mechanical angle (FMA), tibial mechanical angle (TMA) and the joint line convergence angle (JLCA) in osteoarthritic knees. A systematic review was performed using the electronic databases MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE and Google Scholar. The following keywords were used: (morphology OR geometr* OR anatomy OR alignment OR phenotypes), (coronal OR neutral OR varus OR valgus), (knee OR lower limb OR femur OR tibia) and (osteoarthritis OR arthritis). Out of 110 full-text articles retrieved, 15 studies were included. Demographic information included author's names, year of publication, imaging modality, sample size and patient demographics (i.e. sex, age, etc.). Descriptive statistics, such as means, ranges, and measures of variance [e.g. standard deviations, 95% confidence intervals (CI)] for all angles (HKA, FMA, TMA, JLCA) are presented. Thirteen studies reported mean overall HKA angles ranging from 163.5° ± 2.3° to 179.9° ± 4.8°. The mean HKA angles in females were between 164.1° ± 7.2° and 178.8° ± 4.8°, and in malesbetween 163.4° ± 5.5° and 177.4° ± 3.9°. The lowest and highest reported HKA angles were - 27.7° and + 22.0°, respectively. Seven studies reported mean FMA angles. Mean values ranged from 92.7° ± 2.7° valgus to 88.6° ± 2° varus. The reported mean FMAs for male were 87.9° ± 0.5° to 90.7° ± 3° and for female 89.91° ± 2.8° to 92.9° ± 3.1°. Six studies reported mean TMA values. TMA ranged from 81.7° ± 3.9° varus to 87.7° ± 4.1° varus. Only three studies reported mean JLCA angles, which ranged from - 4.3° to - 6.4° ± 3.8°. Osteoarthritic knees showed a huge variation in overall coronal limb alignment as well as in femoral and tibial coronal alignment. Current total knee arthroplasty (TKA) alignment philosophies and preoperative planning do not sufficiently consider these variation, which might be one reason for unhappy knees after TKA. IV, systematic review.

Phenotyping the knee in young non-osteoarthritic knees shows a wide distribution of femoral and tibial coronal alignment.

There is a lack of knowledge about the joint line orientation of the femur and tibia in non-osteoarthritic knees. The primary purpose of the present study was to evaluate the orientation of the joint lines in native non-osteoarthritic knees using 3D-reconstructed CT scans. The secondary purpose was to identify knee phenotypes to combine the information of the femoral and tibial alignment. A total of 308 non-osteoarthritic knees of 160 patients (male to female ratio = 102:58, mean age ± standard deviation 30 ± 7years (16-44years) were retrospectively included from our registry. All patients received CT of the knee according to the Imperial Knee Protocol. The orientation of the femoral and tibial joint line was measured in relation to their mechanical axis (femoral mechanical angle, FMA, and tibial mechanical angle, TMA) using a commercially planning software (KneePLAN 3D, Symbios, Yverdon les Bains, Switzerland). The values of FMA and TMA were compared between males and females. Descriptive statistics, such as means, ranges, and measures of variance (e.g. standard deviations), were presented. Based on these results, phenotypes were introduced for the femur and tibia. These phenotypes, based on FMA and TMA values, consist of a mean value and cover a range of ±1.5° from this mean (3° increments). The distribution of femoral and tibial phenotypes, and their combinations (knee phenotypes) were calculated for the total group and for both genders. The overall mean FMA ± standard deviation (SD) was 93.4° ± 2.0° and values ranged from 87.9° varus to 100° valgus. The overall mean TMA ± SD was 87.2° ± 2.4° with a range of 81.3° varus to 94.6° valgus. FMA and TMA showed significant gender differences (p < 0.01). Females showed more valgus alignment than males. The most common femoral phenotype was neutral in both genders. The most common tibial phenotype was neutral in the male knees (62.8%) and valgus (41.6%) in the female knees. In males, the most frequent combination (knee phenotype) was a neutral phenotype in the femur and a neutral phenotype in the tibia (25.6%). In females, it was a neutral femoral phenotype and a valgus tibial phenotype (28.3%). 3D-reconstructed CT scans confirmed the great variability of the joint line orientation in non-osteoarthritic knees. The introduced femoral and tibial phenotypes enable the evaluation of the femoral and tibial alignment together (knee phenotypes). The variability of knee phenotypes found in this young non-osteoarthritic population clearly shows the need for a more individualized approach in TKA. III.

Effect of tibial component alignment on knee kinematics and ligament tension in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

ObjectivesUnicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is one surgical option for treating symptomatic medial osteoarthritis. Clinical studies have shown the functional benefits of UKA; however, the optimal alignment of the tibial component is still debated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of tibial coronal and sagittal plane alignment in UKA on knee kinematics and cruciate ligament tension, using a musculoskeletal computer simulation.MethodsThe tibial component was first aligned perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the tibia, with a 7° posterior slope (basic model). Subsequently, coronal and sagittal plane alignments were changed in a simulation programme. Kinematics and cruciate ligament tensions were simulated during weight-bearing deep knee bend and gait motions. Translation was defined as the distance between the most medial and the most lateral femoral positions throughout the cycle.ResultsThe femur was positioned more medially relative to the tibia, with increasing varus alignment of the tibial component. Medial/lateral (ML) translation was smallest in the 2° varus model. A greater posterior slope posteriorized the medial condyle and increased anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tension. ML translation was increased in the > 7° posterior slope model and the 0° model.ConclusionThe current study suggests that the preferred tibial component alignment is between neutral and 2° varus in the coronal plane, and between 3° and 7° posterior slope in the sagittal plane. Varus > 4° or valgus alignment and excessive posterior slope caused excessive ML translation, which could be related to feelings of instability and could potentially have negative effects on clinical outcomes and implant durability.Cite this article: K. Sekiguchi, S. Nakamura, S. Kuriyama, K. Nishitani, H. Ito, Y. Tanaka, M. Watanabe, S. Matsuda. Bone Joint Res 2019;8:126–135. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.83.BJR-2018-0208.R2.

The Accuracy of Alignment Determined by Patient-Specific Instrumentation System in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

PurposeThe aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of alignment determined by patient-specific instrumentation system in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).Materials and MethodsTwenty-seven TKAs using patient-specific instrument were reviewed. The intraoperative pin location determined by the patient-specific guide was recorded using imageless navigation software. Data recorded included tibial coronal alignment and posterior slope, femoral coronal alignment and sagittal alignment, and transepicondylar axis. A discrepancy within ±3° in each plane was considered an acceptable result.ResultsOn the tibia, an acceptable alignment was obtained in 24 (88.1%) in the coronal plane and 21 (77.8%) in the sagittal plane. On the femur, a satisfactory alignment was obtained in 25 (92.6%) in the coronal plane and 24 (88.1%) in the sagittal plane. Based on the transepicondylar axis, a satisfactory alignment was obtained in 23 (85.1%).ConclusionsSatisfactory alignment was obtained in more than 85% of each plane of the femur and in the coronal plane of the tibia and relative to the transepicondylar axis. Sufficeint experience and precise preoperative planning are required to improve the accuracy of sagittal alignment of the tibia.

Coronal tibial alignment is linked to femoral rotational asymmetry: Implications for total knee arthroplasty surgery

BackgroundFemoral rotational asymmetry (FRA) is the difference in rotational alignment between the trochlear groove and posterior condyles. We hypothesize that FRA increases as the tibial plateau becomes more varus due to internal rotation of the posterior condyles and external rotation of the trochlear groove to ensure a vertical trochlear groove at 90o knee flexion. MethodsSeventy lower limb Computed Tomography (CT) scans were reviewed by two examiners. Comparisons were made between both the sulcus line (SL) and posterior condylar line (PCL) relative to the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA). Femoral and tibial coronal alignment were measured on CT scanograms and 3D reconstructions. Correlation analysis was performed to identify associations between FRA, SL and PCL and the coronal alignment of the tibia and femur. ResultsThe mean FRA was +2.9° (SL externally rotated to PCL) (−2.4° to +7.7°, SD 2.2o). FRA greater than four degrees occurred in (17/70) 24% of knees. A statistically significant correlation was found between the degree of FRA and proximal tibial varus (MPTA) (R2 = 0.67, p < 0.001). Furthermore, there were significant correlations between the SL and the MPTA (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.77) and the PCL and the MPTA (p < 0.001, R2 = −0.41). ConclusionNative femora are frequently rotationally asymmetrical. As the tibial plateau becomes increasingly varus there is an increase in external rotation of the SL and internal rotation of the PCL. The effect is to maintain a more vertical trochlear groove during flexion in the presence of a varus tibia.

Mismatch between femur and tibia coronal alignment in the knee joint: classification of five lower limb types according to femoral and tibial mechanical alignment

BackgroundReasons for dissatisfaction with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) include unequal flexion or extension gap, soft tissue imbalance, and patella maltracking, which often occur with mismatch between femoral and tibial coronal bony alignment in the knee joint or extremely varus or valgus alignment. However, lower limb coronal alignment classification is based only on hip–knee–ankle angle (HKAA), leading to oversight regarding a mismatch between femoral and tibial coronal alignment. We aimed to classify alignment of the lower limbs according to the mechanical alignment of the femur and tibia in a healthy population.MethodsAll 214 normal triple films were reviewed retrospectively. HKAA, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), angle between the femoral anatomical axis and the mechanical axis (AA-MA), and knee alignment angle (KAA) were measured. Subjects were categorized into one of five types based on the mechanical alignment of femur and tibia.ResultsMean HKAA, mLDFA, and mMPTA of all subjects were 1.2°, 87.3°, and 85.8°, respectively. All subjects were classified into one of five types with significant differences (p < 0.001). About 61% of subjects showed neutral alignment, of which nearly 40% were type 2 (valgus of the femur and varus of the tibia with oblique joint line: mLDFA 85.0° ± 1.4°, mMPTA 85.1° ± 1.2°, TJLA 2.7° ± 2.4°) and 60% exhibited neutral alignment with a neutral femur and tibia (type 1). In varus and valgus types, mismatch between the mechanical angle of the femur and tibia was common. Varus alignment, including types 3 (varus of the tibia: mLDFA 88.0° ± 1.4°, mMPTA 83.5° ± 1.6°) and 4 (varus of both the tibia and femur: mLDFA 91.4° ± 1.4°, mMTPA 85.2° ± 2.0°), was found in 30% of subjects. Valgus alignment (type 5 valgus of femur: mLDFA 84.6° ± 1.6°, mMPTA 88.8° ± 2.0°) accounted for 8.9% of all subjects.ConclusionsMismatch between mechanical alignment of the femur and tibia was common in varus and valgus alignment types. Joint line obliquity was also observed in 40% of the neutral alignment population. This classification provides a quick, simple interpretation of femoral and tibial coronal alignment, and more detailed guidance for preoperative planning for TKA than the traditional varus–neutral–valgus classification.

Preservation of femoral and tibial coronal alignment to improve biomechanical effects of medial unicompartment knee arthroplasty: Computational study.

Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) could be concerned with wear of the cartilage or the wear in the polyethylene (PE) insert. Mechanical alignment determines the biomechanical effect in the long term. However, previous computational studies all found that femoral and tibial components alignment in the UKA were rare, and the results varied. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical effect of the femoral and tibial component coronal alignment in varus and valgus conditions through computational simulation. A three-dimensional finite element model of the intact knee was constructed from medical image data of one healthy subject. A medial UKA model of neutral position and various coronal components was developed from the intact knee joint model. The tibial varus-femoral valgus and tibial valgus-femoral varus conditions were analyzed with parallel component angles of 3°, 6° and 9° by using validated finite element models. We considered the contact stresses in the PE inserts and articular cartilage and the force on collateral ligament under gait cycle condition. Compared to the contact stress in the neutral position model, the contact stress on the PE insert increased in both tibial varus-femoral valgus and tibial valgus-femoral varus models. These trends were also observed in the case of the articular cartilage in remain compartment. However, the contact stress on the PE insert and articular cartilage increased largely in the tibial valgus-femoral varus model than in the tibial varus-femoral valgus model. The forces on the medial and lateral collateral ligaments increased in the tibial valgus-femoral varus model, whereas in the tibial varus-femoral valgus model, the forces decreased compared to the forces in the neutral position. The force on the anterior lateral ligament and popliteofibular ligament increased in the tibial varus-femoral valgus model as compared to the neutral position. Our study suggests that neutral alignment or less than 3° tibial varus-femoral valgus alignment in the coronal plane can be recommended in medial UKA to reduce the postoperative complications and to enhance the life expectancy of implants.

Computational study on the effect of malalignment of the tibial component on the biomechanics of total knee arthroplasty: A Finite Element Analysis.

ObjectivesMalalignment of the tibial component could influence the long-term survival of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The object of this study was to investigate the biomechanical effect of varus and valgus malalignment on the tibial component under stance-phase gait cycle loading conditions.MethodsValidated finite element models for varus and valgus malalignment by 3° and 5° were developed to evaluate the effect of malalignment on the tibial component in TKA. Maximum contact stress and contact area on a polyethylene insert, maximum contact stress on patellar button and the collateral ligament force were investigated.ResultsThere was greater total contact stress in the varus alignment than in the valgus, with more marked difference on the medial side. An increase in ligament force was clearly demonstrated, especially in the valgus alignment and force exerted on the medial collateral ligament also increased.ConclusionThese results highlight the importance of accurate surgical reconstruction of the coronal tibial alignment of the knee joint. Varus and valgus alignments will influence wear and ligament stability, respectively in TKA.Cite this article: D-S. Suh, K-T. Kang, J. Son, O-R. Kwon, C. Baek, Y-G. Koh. Computational study on the effect of malalignment of the tibial component on the biomechanics of total knee arthroplasty: A Finite Element Analysis. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:623–630. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.611.BJR-2016-0088.R2.

Stemmed tibial revision component alignment: Does an anatomic conflict exist?

IntroductionObtaining satisfactory coronal plane alignment is important for success in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The study objective was to determine tibial coronal plane alignment after TKA when a tibial stem was used and assess if there was an anatomic conflict in tibial stemmed component alignment. Materials and methodsA radiographic review of 88 revision TKA cases was performed. Full length leg radiographs were examined for varus/valgus alignment, defined as greater than or equal to three degrees from neutral 180 degrees, canal or non-canal filling tibial stems, and any native tibial bow. ResultsIn tibias with a native valgus alignment of three or more degrees, a canal-filling stem allowed little flexibility to improve final positioning of the tibial stem and resulted in a valgus alignment of the tibial stem in 87.5% of cases, where a canal filling stem was utilized. A non-canal filling stem utilized in native valgus tibias allowed on average a two-degree improvement in tibial alignment and 64.7% of cases resulted in a neutral placement of the tibial stem. ConclusionImplanting the tibial component in a desired position is limited by type of stem and the native angulation of the tibia. When anatomic conflict exists between tibial mechanical axis and the intramedullary canal, canal filling stems may compromise coronal alignment.

The “midsulcus line” as a landmark for tibial resection during total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundProper tibial alignment is an important goal of total knee arthroplasty. Most surgeons agree that tibial coronal alignment should be within three degrees of neutral mechanical alignment. The “midsulcus line” is a line drawn along the sulcus of the tibial spines, and then the line is continued in the sagittal plane and extended onto the anterior tibia where it intersects the tibial tubercle approximately 3 to 4mm lateral to the tubercle's medial border. The tibial cut was then made perpendicular to this line. The aim of our study was to assess, using CT scans, whether this line provided a consistent guide for planning the tibial cut in total knee arthroplasty. MethodsWe reviewed the CT scans of the knees of 107 patients with osteoarthritis who had undergone a CT scan for planning of custom cutting guides. The midsulcus line was drawn on all scans. ResultsWe found that in 105 of 107 knees, a perpendicular cut to this tibial landmark would have delivered a cut surface within three degrees of neutral mechanical alignment. ConclusionsThe midsulcus line is a reliable landmark for planning the tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty. Level of EvidenceIII

Radiological Outcomes and Operative Time following Total Knee Arthroplasty using Accelerometer-based, Portable Navigation versus Conventional Inter-Medullary Alignment Guides

Objectives:Accelerometer-based, portable navigation instrumentation is a new method of achieving desired resection alignments in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).Methods:After randomisation and the application of exclusion criteria, 79 knees were analysed. 42 patients which underwent TKA using conventional intra-medullary (IM) alignment guides were compared to 37 patients with the use of accelerometer-based, portable navigation device (KneeAlign; OrthoAlign Inc, Aliso Viejo, California). Radiographic results were obtained from post-operative computer-tomography following the CT Perth Protocol.Results:In the IM cohort, 81.0% of patients had a coronal alignment within 3° of a neutral mechanical axis (vs 83.8% with KneeAlign, p=0.74), 81.0% had a femoral coronal alignment within 2° of perpendicular to the femoral mechanical axis (vs 89.2% with KneeAlign, p=0.31), and 92.9% had a tibial coronal alignment within 2° of perpendicular to the tibial mechanical axis (vs 81.1% with KneeAlign, p=0.12). Regarding sagittal alignment, the IM cohort had 90.5% of patients with femoral component alignment within 2° of optimum (vs 91.9% with KneeAlign, p=0.83) and 92.9% had a tibial component alignment within 2° of the optimal tibial slope (vs 89.2% with KneeAlign, p=0.57). The mean tourniquet time (from incision to completion of coronal bone resections) in the IM cohort was 16.5± 8.9 minutes vs 22.2 ± 7.6 minutes in the KneeAlign cohort (p<0.003).Conclusion:Accelerometer-based, portable navigation has a statistically similar outcome in alignment following TKA as IM guides. It is noted that using the portable navigation device does prolong surgical time compared to conventional IM surgery and this may be due to the learning curve.

Review Article: Patient-Specific versus Standard Instrumentation for Total Knee Arthroplasty

This meta-analysis reviewed 12 studies comparing patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) with standard instrumentation (SI) for total knee arthroplasty in terms of postoperative coronal alignment and operation time. There is no significant difference between PSI and SI in terms of hip-knee-ankle angle (overall coronal alignment or mechanical axis), tibial coronal alignment, and operation time.

Does Implant Design Influence the Accuracy of Patient Specific Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty?

PSI software adjusts preoperative planning to accommodate differences in implant design. Such adjustments may influence the accuracy of intraoperative jig placement, bone resection, or component placement. Our purpose was to determine whether implant design influences PSI accuracy. 96 and 123 PSI TKA were performed by a single surgeon using two different implant systems and identical PSI software. Femoral coronal alignment outliers were greater for Implant 1 (23.9% Implant 1 vs. 13.4% Implant 2; P=0.050). Tibial coronal alignment outliers were greater for Implant 2 (10.9% Implant 1 vs. 22.7% Implant 2; P=0.025). There was no difference in overall mechanical axes. Differences in implant design can influence bone resection and component alignment. PSI software rationale must align with surgeons’ intraoperative goals.

Accuracy of a hand-held surgical navigation system for tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty.

Accuracy of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implant placement and overall limb are important goals of TKA technique. The accuracy and ease of use of an accelerometer-based hand-held navigation system for tibial resection during TKA was examined in 90 patients. Preoperative goals for sagittal alignment, navigation system assembly time, resection time, and tourniquet time were evaluated. Coronal and sagittal alignment was measured postoperatively. The average coronal tibial component alignment was 0.43° valgus; 6.7% of patients had tibial coronal alignment outside of ±3° varus/valgus. The difference between the intraoperative goal and radiographically measured posterior tibial slope was 0.5°. The average time to completion of the tibial cut was 4.6 minutes. The accelerometer-based hand-held navigation system was accurate for tibial coronal and sagittal alignment during TKA, with no additional surgical time compared with conventional instrumentation.

Closing Wedge and Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy in the ACL Deficient Knee: A Comparison of Stability and Alignment

Objectives:Opening and closing wedge high tibial osteotomies for the treatment of medial compartment arthritis can lead to secondary intended and unintended changes in posterior tibial slope. The effect of slope neutralization using high tibial osteotomies in ACL deficient knees has not been fully defined. The purpose of this study was to quantify the changes in anterior tibial translation and rotational stability in the ACL deficient knee following mulitplanar high tibial osteotomies comparing opening wedge to closing wedge techniques.Methods:Anterior drawer, Lachman, and Pivot-shift tests were performed on hip-to-toe cadaveric specimens (n=16) and translation of the lateral and medial compartments was measured using Praxim navigation system. The ACL was then sectioned and stability testing repeated and compartment translation recorded. Half of the knees then underwent a closing wedge (LCW) high tibial osteotomy using a lateral titanium Tomofix plate and screws (n=8). The contralateral knees underwent an opening wedge (MOW) high tibial osteotomy using a medial titanium Tomofix plate and screws (n=8). The goal of both procedures was for an 8-10mm correction with maximal sagittal slope neutralization. Following this procedure, stability testing and translation measurements were once again performed. Pre and post-operative CT scans were performed to assess initial posterior tibial slope and slope correction, as well as coronal plane correction.Results:Sectioning the ACL resulted in a significant increase in anterior tibial translation (ATT) during Anterior drawer, Lachman, and Pivot shift testing (P < 0.05). In the ACL deficient knee the tibia translated on average an additional 2.1mm (±1.2) during Anterior drawer and 4.1mm (±2.1) during Lachman testing. Performing a LCW osteotomy demonstrated a significant decrease in ATT during Lachman testing that approached the native knee kinematics (P< 0.05), however, this decrease was not found during Anterior Drawer testing. ATT did not significantly improve following MOW osteotomy in the ACL deficient knee during any of the three tests. In fact, absolute translation values were unchanged following this procedure. The pivot shift was not significantly changed following either MOW or LCW. The mean Tibial Coronal alignment correction in the MOW group was 7.2º(±0.95) compared to 5.9º(±1.8) in the LCW group. Although the coronal correction was improved in the MOW, this difference did not reach significance (P = 0.08). The mean tibial slope neutralization achieved with a LCW was 7.1º(±1.8), which was significantly higher than 5.1 º(±0.9) found using MOW (P< 0.05).Conclusion:LCW HTO shows more reproducible slope neutralization than MOW and this benefits anterior translation during Lachman stability testing. When considering the use of an HTO in the setting of ACL deficiency, LCW should be considered given its favorable post-operative knee kinematics.

Comparison of custom to standard TKA instrumentation with computed tomography

There is conflicting evidence whether custom instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves component position compared to standard instrumentation. Studies have relied on long-limb radiographs limited to two-dimensional (2D) analysis and subjected to rotational inaccuracy. We used postoperative computed tomography (CT) to evaluate preoperative three-dimensional templating and CI to facilitate accurate and efficient implantation of TKA femoral and tibial components. We prospectively evaluated a single-surgeon cohort of 78 TKA patients (51 custom, 27 standard) with postoperative CT scans using 3D reconstruction and contour-matching technology to preoperative imaging. Component alignment was measured in coronal, sagittal and axial planes. Preoperative templating for custom instrumentation was 87 and 79 % accurate for femoral and tibial component size. All custom components were within 1 size except for the tibial component in one patient (2 sizes). Tourniquet time was 5 min longer for custom (30 min) than standard (25 min). In no case was custom instrumentation aborted in favour of standard instrumentation nor was original alignment of custom instrumentation required to be adjusted intraoperatively. There were more outliers greater than 2° from intended alignment with standard instrumentation than custom for both components in all three planes. Custom instrumentation was more accurate in component position for tibial coronal alignment (custom: 1.5° ± 1.2°; standard: 3° ± 1.9°; p = 0.0001) and both tibial (custom: 1.4° ± 1.1°; standard: 16.9° ± 6.8°; p < 0.0001) and femoral (custom: 1.2° ± 0.9°; standard: 3.1° ± 2.1°; p < 0.0001) rotational alignment, and was similar to standard instrumentation in other measurements. When evaluated with CT, custom instrumentation performs similar or better to standard instrumentation in component alignment and accurately templates component size. Tourniquet time was mildly increased for custom compared to standard.

Femoral Lateral Bowing and Varus Condylar Orientation Are Prevalent and Affect Axial Alignment of TKA in Koreans

Coronal alignment is considered key to the function and longevity of a TKA. However, most studies do not consider femoral and tibial anatomical features such as lateral femoral bowing and the effects of these features and subsequent alignment on function after TKA are unclear. We therefore determined (1) the prevalence of lateral femoral bowing, varus femoral condylar orientation, and severe tibia plateau inclination in female Koreans undergoing TKA; (2) whether postoperative alignments are affected by these anatomical features and improved by the use of navigation; and (3) whether postoperative coronal alignments are associated with function. We measured alignment in 367 knees that underwent TKA and 60 sex- and age-matched normal knees (control group). We determined patterns and degrees of femoral bowing angle, femoral condylar orientation, and tibial plateau inclination on preoperative full-limb radiographs. Postoperatively, coronal alignment of limbs and of femoral and tibial components was measured. We compared American Knee Society scores, WOMAC scores, and SF-36 scores in aligned knees and outliers (beyond ± 3° or ± 2°) at 1 year. The prevalence of lateral femoral bowing was 88% in the TKA group and 77% in the control group. Mean femoral condylar orientation angle was varus 2.6° in the TKA group and valgus 1.1° in the control group, and mean tibial plateau inclination was varus 8.3° in the TKA group and varus 5.4° in the control group. Femoral lateral bowing and varus femoral condylar orientation were associated with postoperative alignments. Several clinical outcome scales were inferior in the outliers in mechanical tibiofemoral angle, anatomical tibiofemoral angle, and tibial coronal alignment but not in femoral coronal alignment outliers. Lateral femoral bowing, varus condylar orientation, and severe varus inclination of the tibia plateau should be considered when performing TKA in Korean patients or patients with otherwise similar anatomical features.