Tibial Coronal Alignment Research Articles

Femoral Coronal Malalignment is Associated With Failure in Mobile-Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundFemur-first (FF) technique for mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been described as an alternative to tibia-first (TF) technique. The aim of this study was to compare the radiographic results in UKAs using FF or TF techniques and their influence on failure rates. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 288 UKAs with a minimum 2-year follow-up. There were 147 knees in the TF and 141 knees in the FF cohorts. Alignment parameters and overhang were assessed as outliers and far outliers. The mean follow-up was 6 years (range, 2 to 16), the mean age was 63 years (range, 27 to 92), and 45% of patients were women. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were carried out with Cox regression models. ResultsThere were 13 and 6 revisions in the TF and FF cohorts, respectively. The FF had lower rates of femoral coronal alignment (FCA) or femoral sagittal alignment outliers compared to the TF (5.7% versus 19%, P = .011). Tibial coronal alignment and tibial sagittal alignment did not significantly differ between the techniques (22.7% in FF versus 29.9% in TF, P = .119). Overhang outliers did not differ significantly between the groups. Younger age was associated with a higher revision rate (P = .006), while FF versus TF, sex, body mass index, and postoperative mechanical axis did not show statistically significant associations. In multivariate analysis, FCA outliers and younger age were significantly associated with revision. ConclusionsThe FF technique in mobile-bearing UKA resulted in fewer FCA outliers compared to TF. Despite improved knee alignment with the FF technique, FCA outliers and younger age were associated with a higher revision rate, independent of technique.

The Femur-First Technique for Oxford Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

The Femur-First Technique for Oxford Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

An updated meta-analysis comparing complications, functional, clinically relevant and radiological outcomes of accelerometer based portable navigation and conventional technique of total knee arthroplasty

IntroductionSince previous studies, including small-scale meta-analyses comparing accelerometer-based portable navigation (APN-TKA) and conventional techniqueof total knee arthroplasty (CONV-TKA), have reported divergent results, there is a need for an updated meta-analysis to compare complications, functional outcomes, clinically relevant outcomes and radiographic alignment of components. MethodsThis meta-analysis was conducted as per PRISMA guidelines. Randomised controlled trials, and non-randomised comparative cohort studies in English language on primary TKA were included. The complications compared were Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT), Pulmonary Embolism (PE), infection, manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) for postoperative knee stiffness, re-operation and mortality. The functional outcomes compared were the Knee Society Knee Score, Knee Society Score function, Oxford Knee Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index. The evaluated clinically relevant outcomes were surgical time, blood loss, drop in haematocrit, tourniquet time, postoperative knee flexion and complications). The number of radiological outliers; as well as the absolute values of the alignment of the overall prosthesis, femoral and tibial components in both coronal and sagittal planes, was assessed. ResultsTwenty-five studies were included. Both the groups were comparable in terms of preoperative demographic features. There was no difference in complications and functional outcomes. Operation time was longer in APN-TKA (p < 0.00001) but there was no difference in rest of the clinically relevant outcomes. Restoration of the lower limb mechanical axis (p = 0.003) and coronal femoral alignment angle (p = 0.0002) was better with APN. APN also significantly reduced the risk of the odds of outliers of lower limb mechanical axis (p < 0.0001), coronal femoral alignment (p = 0.03), coronal tibial alignment (p < 0.0001) and sagittal tibial alignment (p = 0.0001). ConclusionThe improvement in the accuracy of implantation by the use of APN-TKA, as determined by the overall alignments of prosthesis, or femoral and tibial components, does not necessarily translate into lesser complications and better functional and clinical outcomes. Level of evidenceTherapeutic study, Level II.

Postoperative Medial Malleolar Fractures in Total Ankle Replacement are Associated with Medial Malleolar Width and Coronal Alignment

Category: Ankle Arthritis; Ankle Introduction/Purpose: There is limited evidence regarding risk factors for medial malleolar fractures after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). A previous study showed that patients with medial pain following TAA had significantly thinner (&lt;11mm) medial malleolar width, which has been used as a threshold for placing a prophylactic screw. However, this study included only six patients with pain over the medial malleolus. Other previously reported risk factors include coronal malalignment and poor bone quality. Therefore, this study examined the risk factors of postoperative medial malleolar stress fractures. In addition, we sought to assess the effect of the prophylactic screw placement. We hypothesized that a medial malleolar width &lt;11mm and varus malalignment would be associated with increased fracture risk and that the prophylactic screw placement would be protective. Methods: A case-control study was conducted on 838 patients undergoing primary TAA between 2015 and. TAA revisions, arthrodesis takedowns, and intraoperative medial malleolar fractures were excluded. Demographic and surgical data were obtained. A total of 21 patients with postoperative medial malleolar stress fractures &gt; 4 weeks postoperatively (cases) were identified through radiologic assessment (radiograph, CT, or MRI) and matched to a control group of 129 patients. Radiographic evaluation included pre- and post-TAA tibial coronal alignment, postoperative medial malleolar width at the tibial component, and prophylactic screw fixation. Demographics and radiographic variables were compared between cohorts using the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and Pearson Chi-square for categorical variables. Logistic regression was used to investigate the association of medial malleolar stress fractures with gender, coronal tibial implant size, postoperative coronal alignment, prophylactic screw fixation, and medial malleolar width using odds ratios (OR), and standard error (SE). Results: Of 838 TAAs, 2.51% sustained a postoperative medial malleolar fracture (n = 21). Of these, 13/21 (61.9%) required reoperation: internal fixation (12) and TAA revision (1). Mean (SD) medial malleolar width was significantly smaller in the fracture cohort (8.62 mm [1.63]) than in controls (11.78mm [1.75]), P&lt;0.001). Mean (SD) postoperative tibial component coronal alignment was 92.2º (2.82) for patients with medial malleolar fracture and 90.23º (1.68) for the control cohort (P = 0.003). Postoperative varus tibial component alignment (OR = 1.61 [95%CI 1.16 02 − 2.22], P = 0.004) and smaller medial malleolar width (OR = 0.11 [95% CI 0.04 02 − 0.3], P &lt; 0.001) were associated with increased probability of a post-TAA medial malleolar fracture. Prophylactic screw fixation resulted in a 90% reduction in the odds of a fracture (OR = 0.10 [95%CI 0.02 02 − 0.64], P = 0.015). A medial malleolar width of 10.31 mm was identified as a threshold for predicting a medial malleolar stress fracture. Conclusion: In this study, the prevalence of postoperative periprosthetic fractures after TAA was similar to prior studies. Decreased medial malleolar thickness and postoperative varus malalignment were associated with an increased risk of a postoperative medial malleolar stress fracture. A malleolar width of 10.31 mm was identified as a potential threshold. Prophylactic medial malleolar screw fixation was protective and associated with a 90% reduction in fracture probability. Surgeons should consider prophylactic screw fixation patients with a medial malleolar width &lt; 10.31 mm or at risk of postoperative varus deformity.

Proximal fibular axis is a reliable landmark for tibial coronal alignment in patients with or without knee osteoarthritis: A radiological comparative study.

Proper coronal alignment of the limb is of vital importance in the progression of knee osteoarthritis even in the long-term survivorship of component after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, the relationship between coronal fibular axis and tibial mechanical axis had not reached a consensus in the literatures available. The current study aimed to explore the anatomic relationship between tibia and fibula alignment. A total of 100 patients with knee osteoarthritis scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were enrolled in this study (Group A), and radiographic measurement was compared to a control group of 100 healthy volunteers without knee osteoarthritis (Group B). Full-length standing hip-to-ankle radiographs were used to assess limb alignment. The angle between coronal proximal fibular anatomic axis and tibia mechanical axis (PFTA) was used to represent the anatomic relationship between tibia and fibula alignment. A negative value indicates fibula varus relative to tibia mechanical axis, while a positive value indicates fibula valgus. The mean PFTAs were -0.9° ± 0.9° and -1.0° ± 0.8° in Groups A and B. There was no significant difference between the two groups. No significant difference was detected in PFTA distribution in the group A and B. When the mean value of PFTA is used as baseline data, the percentage of subjects in which the PFTA deviation was within 0.5°, 1°, and 1.5° was 51%, 84%, and 94% in Group A and 53%, 87%, and 96% in Group B. There was also no significant difference in distribution deviation between the two groups. No patient-specific factors were correlated with the PFTA. The proximal fibular anatomic axis is a reliable landmark for tibial mechanical axis in the coronal plane in patients with or without knee osteoarthritis.

Effect of Anterior Tibial Closing Wedge Osteotomy on Coronal Tibial Alignment in Relation to Preoperative Medial Proximal Tibial Angle and Wedge Height.

The posterior tibial slope has been identified as an anatomic risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency and reruptures after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Anterior tibial closing wedge osteotomy for correction of sagittal plane deformities has the potential to cause an unintended change in coronal plane alignment. To evaluate the effects of anterior tibial closing wedge osteotomies for correction of posterior tibial slope on coronal plane alignment using an infratuberosity surgical approach and to identify predictive factors for a change in medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA). Case series; Level of evidence, 4. This study reports on retrospectively obtained data from radiographic measurements of 38 anterior tibial closing wedge osteotomies. All patients underwent revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and had undergone ≥1 previous anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. In all patients, an infratuberosity approach was used with angular stable plate fixation. Pre- and postoperative radiographs were examined retrospectively to detect changes in the sagittal and coronal plane alignment (posterior tibial slope and MPTA). A multivariate regression analysis was used to identify predictors for a change in MPTA. The study group consisted of 14 women and 24 men whose mean ± SD age at the index procedure was 31.6 ± 8.7 years (range, 17-51 years). Posterior tibial slope decreased significantly (by 7.2° ± 2.3°; P < .001) from 14.6° ± 2.0° preoperatively to 7.4° ± 2.1° postoperatively. MPTA decreased significantly by 1.3° ± 1.5° (P = .005) from pre- to postoperative measurement. Mean wedge height was 9.3 ± 1.1 mm. A lower preoperative MPTA (coefficient = 0.32; P = .017; 95% CI, 0.06-0.59) and larger wedge height (coefficient = 0.48; P = .029; 95% CI, 0.05-0.9) were significant predictive factors for a decrease in MPTA. Anterior tibial closing wedge osteotomy for posterior tibial slope reduction resulted in a slight but significant decrease of the MPTA in the coronal plane. These changes were dependent on the preoperative MPTA and the wedge height.

Augmented Reality Navigation Can Achieve Accurate Coronal Component Alignment During Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Background Computer-navigated knee arthroplasty has been shown to improve accuracy over conventional instruments. The next generation of computer assistance is being developed using augmented reality. The accuracy of augmented reality navigation has not been established. Methods From April 2021 to October 2021, a prospective, consecutive series of 20 patients underwent total knee arthroplasty utilising an augmented reality-assisted navigation system (ARAN). The coronal and sagittal alignment of the femoral and tibial bone cuts was measured using the ARAN and the final position of the components was measured on postoperative CT scans. The absolute difference between the measurements was recorded to determine the accuracy of the ARAN. Results Two cases were excluded due to segmentation errors, leaving 18 cases for analysis. The ARAN produced a mean absolute error of 1.4°, 2.0°, 1.1°and 1.6° for the femoral coronal, femoral sagittal, tibial coronal and tibial sagittal alignments, respectively. No outliers (absolute error of >3°) were identified in femoral coronal or tibial coronal alignment measurements. Three outliers were identified in tibial sagittal alignment, with all cases demonstrating less tibial slope (by 3.1°, 3.3° and 4°). Five outliers were identified in femoral sagittal alignment and in all cases, the component was more extended (3.1°, 3.2°, 3.2°, 3.4° and 3.9°). The mean operative time significantly decreased from the first nine augmented reality cases to the final nine cases by 11 minutes (p<0.05). There was no difference in the accuracy between the early and late ARAN cases. Conclusion Augmented reality navigation can achieve accurate alignment of total knee arthroplasty with a low rate of component malposition in the coronal plane. Acceptable and consistent accuracy can be achieved from the initial adoption of this technique, however, some sagittal outliers were identified and there is a clear learning curve with respect to operating time. The level of evidence was IV.

Comparison of tibial alignment parameters based on clinically relevant anatomical landmarks : a deep learning radiological analysis.

Accurate identification of the ankle joint centre is critical for estimating tibial coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of the current study was to leverage artificial intelligence (AI) to determine the accuracy and effect of using different radiological anatomical landmarks to quantify mechanical alignment in relation to a traditionally defined radiological ankle centre. Patients with full-limb radiographs from the Osteoarthritis Initiative were included. A sub-cohort of 250 radiographs were annotated for landmarks relevant to knee alignment and used to train a deep learning (U-Net) workflow for angle calculation on the entire database. The radiological ankle centre was defined as the midpoint of the superior talus edge/tibial plafond. Knee alignment (hip-knee-ankle angle) was compared against 1) midpoint of the most prominent malleoli points, 2) midpoint of the soft-tissue overlying malleoli, and 3) midpoint of the soft-tissue sulcus above the malleoli. A total of 932 bilateral full-limb radiographs (1,864 knees) were measured at a rate of 20.63 seconds/image. The knee alignment using the radiological ankle centre was accurate against ground truth radiologist measurements (inter-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.99 (0.98 to 0.99)). Compared to the radiological ankle centre, the mean midpoint of the malleoli was 2.3 mm (SD 1.3) lateral and 5.2 mm (SD 2.4) distal, shifting alignment by 0.34o (SD 2.4o) valgus, whereas the midpoint of the soft-tissue sulcus was 4.69 mm (SD 3.55) lateral and 32.4 mm (SD 12.4) proximal, shifting alignment by 0.65o (SD 0.55o) valgus. On the intermalleolar line, measuring a point at 46% (SD 2%) of the intermalleolar width from the medial malleoli (2.38 mm medial adjustment from midpoint) resulted in knee alignment identical to using the radiological ankle centre. The current study leveraged AI to create a consistent and objective model that can estimate patient-specific adjustments necessary for optimal landmark usage in extramedullary and computer-guided navigation for tibial coronal alignment to match radiological planning.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open2022;3(10):767-776.

No Correlation Between Clinical Outcomes and Changes in the Tibia-Metaphyseal Angle Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study

BackgroundDespite numerous advances in the implant design and surgical technique, improvement in patient satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has plateaued. Various TKA alignment strategies have been introduced that impact the coronal positioning of the tibial component relative to the native joint line. This study aims to analyze if postoperative variance of the joint line from preoperative native alignment is correlated with changes in patient-reported outcomes following primary TKA. MethodsA retrospective review of an academic center’s patient population identified all primary TKAs between 2013 and 2021 with full-length, standing radiographs and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) data. These measures included the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System, and Veterans RAND 12 scores. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic measurements for hip-knee angle, tibia-metaphyseal angle, tibial-axis orientation angle, and joint-line obliquity angle were recorded. Three-month, 1-year, and 2-year PROM scores were correlated with the change in degrees for each of the angles using a Spearman’s correlation. A Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare angular changes with a change in PROM scores. ResultsOne hundred and ninety nine patients (204 knees) with a mean age of 67 years were included. Average follow-up was 23 months. Three-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up rates were 93%, 64%, and 34%, respectively. Improvements were seen across all PROMs regardless of an angular change. ConclusionThere were no clear correlations between PROMs and variation in joint line obliquity in the coronal plane. These data suggest that the magnitude of the variation in coronal tibial alignment from native alignment does not impact PROMs. Further study is indicated to correlate an angular change with functional measures.

Image-Free Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Improves Implant Alignment Accuracy: A Cadaveric Study.

Improving resection accuracy and eliminating outliers in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is important to improving patient outcomes regardless of alignment philosophy. Robotic-assisted surgical systems improve resection accuracy and reproducibility compared to conventional instrumentation. Some systems require preoperative imaging while others rely on intraoperative anatomic landmarks. We hypothesized that the alignment accuracy of a novel image-free robotic-assisted surgical system would be equivalent or better than conventional instrumentation with fewer outliers. Forty cadaveric specimens were used in this study. Five orthopedic surgeons performed 8 bilateral TKAs each, using the VELYS Robotic-Assisted System (DePuy Synthes) and conventional instrumentation on contralateral knees. Pre-resection and postresection computed tomography scans, along with optical scans of the implant positions were performed to quantify resection accuracies relative to the alignment targets recorded intraoperatively. The robotic-assisted cohort demonstrated smaller resection errors compared to conventional instrumentation in femoral coronal alignment (0.63° ± 0.50° vs 1.39° ± 0.95°, P < .001), femoral sagittal alignment (1.21° ± 0.90° vs 3.27° ± 2.51°, P < .001), and tibial coronal alignment (0.93° ± 0.72° vs 1.65° ± 1.29°, P= .001). All other resection angle accuracies were equivalent. Similar improvements were found in the femoral implant coronal alignment (0.89° ± 0.82° vs 1.42° ± 1.15°, P= .011), femoral implant sagittal alignment (1.51° ± 1.08° vs 2.49° ± 2.10°, P= .006), and tibial implant coronal alignment (1.31° ± 0.84° vs 2.03° ± 1.44°, P= .004). The robotic-assisted cohort had fewer outliers (errors >3°) for all angular resection alignments. This invitro study demonstrated that image-free robotic-assisted TKA can improve alignment accuracy compared to conventional instrumentation and reduce the incidence of outliers.

Functional Outcome Based on Mechanical Axis Alignment Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BackgroundTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the most commonly performed and highly successful surgical intervention for end-stage osteoarthritis of the knee, and it offers patients pain relief, functional recovery, and improved quality of life. The success of knee arthroplasty depends on various factors such as precise surgical technique, alignment of the limb and components, patient selection, and compliance with rehabilitation. Mechanical alignment of the lower limb has been considered an important factor in planning and assessing the success of TKA. Optimal alignment remains a matter of controversy; hence, it is paramount to assess the alignment and functional outcomes.Aim and objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the reliability of conventional instrumentation in imparting the intended femoral and tibial coronal alignment, as well as study the functional outcome among the neutrally aligned outliers with respect to the mechanical axis of the lower limb using standing long-leg radiographs.MethodologyThis is a prospective, hospital-based, observational study that was conducted on 60 knees in 42 patients with primary osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the department of orthopedics, Satguru Partap Singh (SPS) Hospitals, Ludhiana. Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in our study and evaluated using Knee Society Score and knee flexion range at periodic follow-up till six months. Preoperative and postoperative standing long-leg radiographs were done for all the patients, and their functional outcome was compared among inliers and outliers.ResultsOut of these 60 total knee arthroplasties, 18 patients were operated on both knees, and 24 patients were operated on a single knee. There were 25 female patients and 17 male patients. The mean for pre-operative mechanical axis alignment angle was 11.88° ± 5.63° with a range from -3° to 27°, which changed to 2.90° ± 1.59° with a range from 0° to 8° at six months follow-up. It was observed that 42 of the knees were in the inliers, and the remaining 18 knees were in the outliers group. On comparison among inliers and outliers, we found that the mean range of motion was 108.29° ± 4.82° for the inliers group and 106.11° ± 4.04° for the outliers group (p = 0.091), depicting non-significant statistical comparison. Mean Knee Society Score values in inliers and outliers group were 152.45 ± 5.33 and 151.61 ± 3.55, respectively (p = 0.740), showing no statistical significance.ConclusionAt six months follow-up, there is no difference in the knee range of motion and Knee Society Scores between mechanical axis inliers and outliers. Thus, we conclude that although every knee arthroplasty is intended to have neutral mechanical alignment, there is no effect of mild mechanical axis malalignment on functional outcome following total knee arthroplasty in the short term.

The Natural History of Medial Meniscal Root Tears: A Biomechanical and Clinical Case Perspective.

Posterior medial meniscus root tears (PMMRTs) make up a relatively notable proportion of all meniscus pathology and have been definitively linked to the progression of osteoarthritis (OA). While known risk factors for development of OA in the knee include abnormal tibial coronal alignment, obesity and female gender, PMMRTs have emerged in recent years as another significant driver of degenerative disease. These injuries lead to an increase in average contact pressure in the medial compartment, along with increases in peak contact pressure and a decrease in contact area relative to the intact state. Loss of the root attachment impairs the function of the entire meniscus and leads to meniscal extrusion, thus impairing the force-dissipating role of the meniscus. Anatomic meniscus root repairs with a transtibial pullout technique have been shown biomechanically to restore mean and peak contact pressures in the medial compartment. However, nonanatomic root repairs have been reported to be ineffective at restoring joint pressures back to normal. Meniscal extrusion is often a consequence of nonanatomic repair and is correlated with progression of OA. In this study, the authors will describe the biomechanical basis of the natural history of medial meniscal root tears and will support the biomechanical studies with a case series including patients that either underwent non-operative treatment (5 patients) or non-anatomic repair of their medial meniscal root tears (6 patients). Using measurements derived from axial MRI, the authors will detail the distance from native root attachment center of the non-anatomic tunnels and discuss the ongoing symptoms of those patients. Imaging and OA progression among patients who were treated nonoperatively before presentation to the authors will be discussed as well. The case series thus presented will illustrate the natural history of meniscal root tears, the consequences of non-anatomic repair, and the findings of symptomatic meniscal extrusion associated with a non-anatomic repair position of the meniscus.

Joint line is restored in robotic-arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty performed with a tibia-based functional alignment.

Functional alignment (FA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been introduced to restore the native joint line obliquity, respect the joint line height and minimize the need of soft tissue releases. The purpose of this study was to assess the intraoperative joint line alignment and compare it with the preoperative epiphyseal orientation of the femur and tibia in patients undergoing robotic-arm-assisted (RA)-TKA using FA. This retrospective study included a consecutive series of patients undergoing RA-TKA between February 2019 and February 2021. The joint line orientation of the femur and tibia in the three-dimensions was calculated and classified on preoperative CT-scans and compared with the intraoperative implant alignment. The tibial cut was performed according to the tibial preoperative anatomy. The femoral cuts were fine-tuned based on tensioned soft tissues, aiming for balanced medial and lateral gaps in flexion and extension. A total of 115 RA-TKAs were assessed. On average, the tibial component was placed at 1.8° varus (SD 1.3), while the femur was placed at 0.8° valgus (SD 2.2) and 0.6° external rotation (SD 2.6) relative to the surgical transepicondylar axis. Moderate to strong, statistically significant relationships were described between preoperative tibial coronal alignment and tibial cut orientation (r = 0.7, p < 0.0001), preoperative femoral orientation in the coronal and axial planes and intraoperative femoral cuts alignment (r = 0.7, p < 0.0001 and r = 0.5, p < 0.0001, respectively). One case (0.9%) of slight tibial component varus subsidence was reported 45-days post-operatively, but implant revision was not necessary. The proposed robotic-assisted functional technique for TKA alignment, with a restricted tibial component coronal alignment, based on the preoperative phenotype and femoral component positioning as dictated by the soft tissues, provided joint line respecting resections. Further studies are needed to assess long-term implant survivorship, patient satisfaction and alignment-related failures.

Assessment of accuracy of an imageless hand-held robotic-assisted system in component positioning in total knee replacement: a prospective study

In recent years, robotic technology is becoming more pervasive in joint arthroplasty. The role of robotics in joint replacement surgery is to bring precision and accuracy in bone preparation, implant positioning and soft tissue balancing. However, there is yet to be a study conducted to determine the accuracy of bone preparation done by a new robotic system. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and report on the accuracy of bone cuts using imageless semiautonomous freehand robotic sculpting system, Navio (Smith & Nephew) based on the data provided by the robotic system. Between August 2018 and May 2019, a total of 62 patients were prospectively enrolled in this study. All surgeries were done by the senior author using a medial para-patellar approach and using a posterior stabilised implant (Anthem, Smith & Nephew Inc.). The study included 37 female patients and 25 male patients. The parameters assessed in this study were: (1) mechanical axis, (2) femoral coronal alignment, (3) femoral rotation, (4) femoral sagittal alignment, (5) tibial slope and (6) tibial coronal alignment using paired t test and root mean squared error (RMSE). The robotic system was accurate in achieving the bone cuts as planned in mechanical axis alignment (p = 0.89, RMSE = 0.56), femoral coronal alignment (p = 0.36, RMSE = 0.36), femoral sagittal alignment (p = 0.10, RMSE = 0.44), femoral rotation (p = 0.91, RMSE = 0.11), tibial coronal alignment (p = 0.81, RMSE = 0.24) and tibial slope (p = 0.30, RMSE = 0.37) with the maximum RMSE being 0.56. This study demonstrated that semi-autonomous hand-held robotic system, Navio (Smith & Nephew) for total knee arthroplasty produced accurate component positioning as per plan in all planes. The maximum RMSE was 0.56°.

The Adjustment of the Rotational Alignment of the Distal End of the Extramedullary Guide to the Anteroposterior Axis of the Proximal Tibia in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The optimal placement within 3 degrees in coronal alignment was reportedly achieved in only 60 to 80% of patients when using an extramedullary alignment guide for the tibial side in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This probably occurs because the extramedullary alignment guide is easily affected by the position of the ankle joint which is difficult to define by tibial torsion. Rotational direction of distal end of the extramedullary guide should be aligned to the anteroposterior (AP) axis of the proximal tibia to acquire optimal coronal alignment in the computer simulation studies; however, its efficacy has not been proven in a clinical setting. The distal end of the guide can be overly displaced from the ideal position when using a conventional guide system despite the alignment of the AP axis to the proximal tibia. This study investigated the effect of displacement of the distal end of extramedullary guide relative to the tibial coronal alignment while adjusting the rotational alignment of the distal end to the AP axis of the proximal tibia in TKA. A total of 50 TKAs performed in 50 varus osteoarthritic knees using an image-free navigation system were included in this study. The rotational alignment of the proximal side of the guide was adjusted to the AP axis of the proximal tibia. The position of the distal end of the guide was aligned to the center of the ankle joint as viewed from the proximal AP axis (ideal position) and as determined by the navigation system. The tibial intraoperative coronal alignments were recorded as the distal end was moved from the ideal position at 3-mm intervals. The intraoperative alignments were 0.5, 0.9, and 1.4 degrees in valgus alignment with 3-, 6-, and 9-mm medial displacements, respectively. The intraoperative alignments were 0.7, 1.2, and 1.7 degrees in varus alignment with 3-, 6-, and 9-mm lateral displacements, respectively. In conclusion, the acceptable tibial coronal alignment (within 2 degrees from the optimal alignment) can be achieved, although some displacement of the distal end from the ideal position can occur after the rotational alignment of the distal end of the guide is adjusted to the AP axis of the proximal tibia.

Primary osteoarthritic knees have more varus coronal alignment of the femur compared to young non-arthritic knees in a large cohort study.

Many surgeons are performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with an aim to reproducing native anatomical coronal alignment. Yet, it remains unclear if primary osteoarthritic and non-osteoarthritic populations have similar knee coronal alignment. This study aims to describe and compare the distribution of femoral and tibial coronal alignment in a large primary osteoarthritic cohort and a young non-osteoarthritic cohort. This is a retrospective analysis of a monocentric prospectively gathered data, from 1990 to 2019, of 2859 consecutive primary osteoarthritic knees in 2279 patients. Patients underwent standardized long-leg radiographs. Femoral mechanical angle (FMA) and tibial mechanical angle (TMA) were digitally measured using software. Femoral, tibial and knee phenotypes were analyzed, and descriptive data were reported. Data were compared to a young non-osteoarthritic population previously described. In osteoarthritic knees, the mean FMA was 91° ± 2.9° (range 86°-100°) and the mean TMA was 87° ± 3.1° (range 80°-94°). No significant difference was observed for FMA and TMA between genders. The most common femoral and tibial phenotypes were varus (38.7%) and neutral (37.1%). The most frequent knee phenotype was a varus femoral phenotype with a neutral tibial phenotype (15.5%), which is different to the non-osteoarthritic population. This study showed the wide distribution of knee phenotypes in a large osteoarthritic cohort. There was more varus distribution of the femoral coronal alignment compared to a non-osteoarthritic population, suggesting consideration and potential adaptation of the realignment strategy of the femoral component during TKA. III.

Tibial alignment technique and its influence on clinical and functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundRestoration of neutral mechanical axis is thought to influence implant survival and function in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). There is no consensus whether Intramedullary (IM) or Extramedullary (EM) tibial alignment technique is superior to achieve this outcome. Study aims to evaluate functional and radiological outcome of TKA using the EM and IM technique. Materials and methodsA retrospective study of 400 primary TKA (314 patients) was performed. 200 knees were studied in each IM and EM group, which were matched. Functional assessment was performed using Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Tibial component alignment measured in coronal and sagittal radiographs. ResultsThe average coronal and sagittal alignment of the tibial component in IM group was 89.16° and 88°, whereas in EM group, these were 88.1° and 88.5° respectively. The adjusted mean difference change in Pre and Post-operative OKS in IM group compared to EM group was 0.5 (p = 0.52). There was no statistically significant difference in the complications between the two groups. Subgroup analysis of patients with BMI >35 showed predictable coronal tibial alignment with IM technique with fewer outliers. ConclusionIntramedullary tibial alignment is associated with fewer outliers compared to the extramedullary technique particularly in patients with a BMI over 35.

Extramedullary Guide Alignment Is not Affected by Obesity in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Coronal alignment of the tibial implant correlates with survivorship of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), especially in obese patients. The purpose of this study was to determine if obesity affects coronal plane alignment of the tibial component when utilizing standard extramedullary tibial guide instrumentation during primary TKA. A retrospective review from June 2017 to February 2018 identified 142 patients (162 primary TKAs). There were 88 patients (100 knees) with body mass index (BMI) < 35 kg/m2 and 54 patients (62 knees) with BMI ≥ 35.0 kg/m2. The cohorts did not differ in age (p = 0.37), gender (p = 0.61), or Charlson's comorbidity index (p = 0.54). Four independent reviewers measured the angle between the base of the tibial component and the mechanical axis of the tibia on the anteroposterior view of long-leg film at first postoperative clinic visit. Outliers were defined as patients with greater than 5 degrees of varus or valgus alignment (n = 0). Reoperations and complications were recorded to 90 days postoperatively. There was no significant difference in mean tibial coronal alignment between the two groups (control alignment 90.8 ± 1.2 degree versus obese alignment 90.8 ± 1.2 degree, p = 0.91). There was no difference in varus versus valgus alignment (p = 0.19). There was no difference in the number of outliers (two in each group, p = 0.73). There was no difference in rate of reoperation (p = 1.0) or complication (p = 0.51). Obesity did not affect coronal plane alignment of the tibial component when using an extramedullary guide during primary TKA in our population.

The unicompartmental knee is the preferred side in individuals with both a unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty

PurposeTo determine the preferred knee in patients with both one total and one unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.MethodPatients simply with a unicompartmental (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on contralateral sides were retrospectively screened from three senior knee surgeon’s logs over a 15 year period. Patients safe and free from other diseases to affect gait were approached. A total of 16 patients (mean age 70 ± 8) agreed to ground reaction force testing on an instrumented treadmill at a fair pace and incline. A gender-ratio identical group of 16 healthy control subjects (mean age 67 ± 10) and 16 patients with ipsilateral medial knee OA (mean age 66 ± 7) were analysed to compare.ResultsRadiographically the mode preoperative Kellgren–Lawrence knee grade for each side was 3. Postoperatively, the TKA side had a mean coronal femoral component alignment of 7° and a mean tibial coronal alignment of 89° with a mean posterior slope of 5° in the sagittal plane. The UKA side had a mean coronal femoral component alignment of 7° and a mean tibial coronal alignment of 86° with a mean posterior slope of 4° in the sagittal plane. In 7 patients, the TKA was the first procedure, while 6 for the UKA and 3 done simultaneously. Gait analysis demonstrated in both walking conditions the UKA limb was the preferred side through all phases of loading (p < 0.05) and nearer to normal than the TKA limb when compared to healthy controls and patients with knee OA. The greatest difference was observed between the transition of weight acceptance and midstance (p = 0.008), when 22% more load was taken by the UKA side.ConclusionBy using a dynamic metric of an everyday activity, a distinct gait difference between differing arthroplasty types were established. A more natural loading pattern can be achieved with unicompartmentals as compared to total knees.Level of evidenceRetrospective comparative study, Level III.

Improved implant alignment accuracy with an accelerometer-based portable navigation system in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

This study aimed to examine the accuracy of tibial implant alignment using an accelerometer-based portable navigation system in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). This retrospective matched case-control study reviewed 51 UKAs performed using an accelerometer-based portable navigation system, matched with 51 UKAs performed using conventional extramedullary rods. Coronal alignment and posterior slope of the tibial implant were measured on postoperative radiographs, and differences from preoperative planning were examined. Outliers and accuracy of tibial implant alignment were compared between the portable navigation and conventional groups using Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test, respectively. In the portable navigation group, 100% of the implants were aligned within 3.0° of both target coronal and sagittal implant alignment. In the conventional group, 76.5% and 88.2% of the implants were within 3.0° of both target coronal and sagittal implant alignment. Statistical analysis revealed that outliers of coronal and sagittal alignment were significantly less in the portable navigation group than in the conventional group (P < 0.05). In addition, the absolute value difference between postoperative measurement and preoperative planning of both coronal and sagittal alignment was significantly smaller in the portable navigation group than in the conventional group (P < 0.05). The portable navigation system improved the accuracy of tibial implant alignment in UKA. We found that 100% of the implants were aligned within 3.0° of both target coronal and sagittal implant alignment. The portable navigation system decreased the outliers of tibial coronal and sagittal alignment. Retrospective case-control study, Level III.