Tibial Cone Research Articles

A Useful Tip for Removal of a Well-fixed Trabecular Metal Tibial Cone

We present a technique for removal of a well-fixed porous tantalum tibial cone in the setting of a revision total knee arthroplasty. The following case is of a 56-year-old man who required a repeat 2-stage revision of an infected total knee implant that included a porous tantalum tibial cone (Trabecular Metal). The patient had previously undergone a 2-stage revision and achieved excellent fixation with a stemmed, posterior stabilized, rotating platform revision implant, and a well-ingrown porous tantalum tibial cone. To potentiate a successful outcome and avoid further bone loss, this technique was implemented for tibial cone extraction. Using the Ultra-Drive Ultrasonic Revision System the well-fixed porous tantalum tibial cone was removed with minimal bone loss and without intraoperative fracture. While this was only 1 case, it provides a strategy for arthroplasty surgeons to successfully remove well-ingrown porous tantalum tibial cones in the setting of infection.

Medium term clinical outcomes of tibial cones in revision knee arthroplasty.

Trabecular metal cones are a relatively new option for reconstruction of major bone defects during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of the present study was to retrospectively assess medium-term results for tibial cones in revision TKA with a severe proximal tibial bone defect. We hypothesized that revision TKA patients with bone defects treated with trabecular metal cones have excellent medium-term clinical and radiological results. A single-center retrospective review included all consecutive cases of tibial revision using trabecular metal cones. All patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included in the study. There were no exclusion criteria. The primary endpoint was tibial cone survivorship. The secondary endpoints were revision TKA all-cause survivorship, patient-reported outcome measures with a Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), SF 12, and radiographic analysis. Five of the 57 patients alive at last follow-up (8.77%) had undergone revision (4 for infection and 1 for instability). Complications comprised four cases (7.02%) of infection, 2 cases (3.51%) of tibial and femoral implant aseptic loosening that did not require revision surgery, 1 of which (1.75%) with associated patellar loosening, and 1 case (1.75%) of instability. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed 100% 5-year survivorship with tibial cone revision for aseptic loosening and 93.44% (95% CI 83.47-97.49%) for all-cause revision. The present study of cones used for tibial revision supports shows excellent results; however, longer and larger follow-up is needed to better assess results in revision TKA. 4, retrospective study.

Micromotion Analysis of Various Tibial Constructs in Moderate Tibial Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe purpose of this study is to compare the micromotion of various tibial reconstruction strategies including short cemented and long cementless stems with or without metaphyseal augmentation. MethodsA moderate tibial bone defect was milled into dual density polyurethane test blocks. Mechanical testing was performed on 4 test constructs: (1) short cemented stem (75-mm total length) alone; (2) short cemented stem with a symmetric metaphyseal cone; (3) a press-fit (175-mm total length) diaphyseal engaging tibial construct without a cone, and (4) the same press-fit tibial construct with a metaphyseal cone augment. Micromotion of the baseplate/cone construct with respect to the tibia block was measured during a stair descent loading profile for 10,000 cycles. The peak-to-peak micromotion of these various tibial constructs was compared. Unpaired t-tests were used to evaluate differences in peak-to-peak micromotion among the various tibial constructs tested. An analysis of variance was performed for final validation. ResultsThe cemented short stem demonstrated similar varus/valgus displacement, internal/external rotation, compression, and lift-off micromotion values under loading compared to a cementless long stem. A tibial cone improved compression and lift-off micromotion for both cemented and cementless constructs. A short 50-mm cemented stem with a cone demonstrated a lower micromotion at the anterior SI location compared to a press-fit 150-mm cementless stem without a tibial cone. ConclusionsA short cemented tibial component with a cone achieved similar micromotion during simulated stair descent compared to a cementless diaphyseal press-fit implant in cases of moderate tibial defects

Varus-valgus constraint in 416 revision total knee arthroplasties with cemented stems provides a reliable reconstruction with a low subsequent revision rate at early to mid-term review.

Varus-valgus constrained (VVC) implants are often used during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to gain coronal plane stability. However, the increased mechanical torque applied to the bone-cement interface theoretically increases the risk of aseptic loosening. We assessed mid-term survivorship, complications, and clinical outcomes of a fixed-bearing VVC device in revision TKAs. A total of 416 consecutive revision TKAs (398 patients) were performed at our institution using a single fixed-bearing VVC TKA from 2007 to 2015. Mean age was 64 years (33 to 88) with 50% male (199). Index revision TKA diagnoses were: instability (n = 122, 29%), aseptic loosening (n = 105, 25%), and prosthetic joint infection (PJI) (n = 97, 23%). All devices were cemented on the epiphyseal surfaces. Femoral stems were used in 97% (n = 402) of cases, tibial stems in 95% (n = 394) of cases; all were cemented. In total, 93% (n = 389) of cases required a stemmed femoral and tibial component. Femoral cones were used in 29%, and tibial cones in 40%. Survivorship was assessed via competing risk analysis; clinical outcomes were determined using Knee Society Scores (KSSs) and range of movement (ROM). Mean follow-up was four years (2 to 10). The five-year cumulative incidence of subsequent revision for aseptic loosening and instability were 2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2 to 3, number at risk = 154) and 4% (95% CI 2 to 6, number at risk = 153), respectively. The five-year cumulative incidence of any subsequent revision was 14% (95% CI 10 to 18, number at risk = 150). Reasons for subsequent revision included PJI (n = 23, of whom 12 had previous PJI), instability (n = 13), and aseptic loosening (n = 11). The use of this implant without stems was found to be a significant risk factor for subsequent revision (hazard ratio (HR) 7.58 (95% CI 3.98 to 16.03); p = 0.007). KSS improved from 46 preoperatively to 81 at latest follow-up (p < 0.001). ROM improved from 96° prerevision to 108° at latest follow-up (p = 0.016). The cumulative incidence of subsequent revision for aseptic loosening and instability was very low at five years with this fixed-bearing VVC implant in revision TKAs. Routine use of cemented and stemmed components with targeted use of metaphyseal cones likely contributed to this low rate of aseptic loosening. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(4):458-462.

Midterm Results After Tantalum Cones in 1-Stage Knee Exchange for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Single-Center Study

BackgroundThe use of tantalum cones to reconstruct extensive bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty has been established. We aimed to evaluate the midterm results after 1-stage knee exchange for periprosthetic joint infection using tantalum cones. MethodsSeventy-two patients (mean age, 70 ± 8.2 years) treated with a 1-stage exchange for infected total knee arthroplasty using porous tantalum cones, between 2011 and 2016, were retrospectively included. Either rotating or pure hinge system in combination with femoral and/or tibial cones was used. Survivorship analysis (septic and aseptic) was performed. Prospectively, functional outcome was assessed at a mean follow-up of 49.9 ± 18.8 months (range, 24-88). ResultsA total of 15 patients (21%) were rerevised, 8 (11.1%) for infection and 7 (10%) for aseptic loosening, requiring cone exchange in 12 patients (17%). Cone-related survival free from any revision was 83% ± 3.8 standard deviation (95% confidence interval, 74-90), and infection-free survival was 89% ± 4.2 standard deviation (95% confidence interval, 76-93). No significant correlation was reported between the types of prosthesis used (P = .8) or implanted cones and failure (P = .6). History of a previous septic revision increased the risk of cone revision after the index surgery (P < .001). Preoperative Hospital for Special Surgery knee score improved from 47 ± 16 (range, 14-87) to 60 ± 17 (range, 24-84) points at the latest follow-up. ConclusionFirst study reports on outcomes of the 1-stage exchange using tantalum cones for knee periprosthetic joint infection with additional severe bone loss. Midterm cone-related and infection-free survival offered good results and provided reasonable functional outcomes.

Removal of Well-Fixed Tibial Cone in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty-A Uniquely Challenging Yet Necessary Scenario.

The number of revision total knee arthroplasties (TKA) performed in the United States continues to increase. While advancements in implant design and surgical technique have led to improved outcomes compared with historical data, these cases remain technically demanding with high rates of aseptic failure and worse patient reported outcome scores compared with primary total knee arthroplasty. One particular problem commonly encountered in revision knee arthroplasty is bone loss, particularly in the epiphyseal region, which negatively impacts the structural integrity of the implants. Various modular metaphyseal sleeves and cones in conjunction with stemmed implants have been designed to enhance metaphyseal fixation, corroborated by multiple studies demonstrating excellent midterm results involving cones, and sleeves. Commercially available revision systems that incorporate metaphyseal cones are currently widely utilized in revision TKA. For tibial defects, both symmetric and asymmetric cone options are available. Excellent midterm results have been reported with use of this device in the setting of severe proximal tibial bone loss in revision TKA surgery. With the enhanced fixation provided by various sleeve and cone augments, implant removal in the setting of recurrent infection or implant failure can be extremely challenging. Consequently, in this work, we sought to describe an algorithmic approach for removing a tibial cone in conjunction with the overlying tibial baseplate. A review of the literature has also been conducted for complex surgical techniques regarding removal of well-fixed implants in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Metaphyseal Fixation Using Highly Porous Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum Two Year Follow Up Study

BackgroundHighly porous metaphyseal cones have been introduced to restore metaphyseal integrity for improved cement interdigitation to achieve durable fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study is to review the survivorship, clinical results, and complications of revision TKA using highly porous 3-dimensionally printed titanium metaphyseal cones. MethodsThis is a review of 62 revision TKAs using metaphyseal tibial cones, with 15 cases utilizing both tibial and femoral cones. The mean age of the patients was 66 years (range 32-84) who had a mean follow-up of 27 months (range 24-34). There were 38 women and 24 men, who had a mean body mass index of 33 (range 18.3-62). ResultsRevision-free survival of the cones was 90.2%. If infection was excluded, survivorship was 100%. There were no cases of aseptic loosening. The mean Knee Society Score improved from 51 points preoperatively to 80 points at the time of latest follow-up. The mean Knee Society Functional Score improved from 48 points preoperatively to 68 points. A total of 15 of the 62 patients (24%) required additional surgery: 10 (16%) for infection, 3 (5%) for contracture, 1 for patellar subluxation, and 1 for quadriceps tendon rupture. ConclusionMetaphyseal fixation is important for survivorship in revision TKA which can be challenging due to cancellous and structural bone loss encountered at the time of revision. Prosthetic joint infection continues to be the leading cause of failure in revision TKA. The use of highly porous titanium metaphyseal cones produced from 3-dimensionally printed technology used in this study demonstrated excellent short-term results with no cases of aseptic loosening. Further follow-up is required to determine if these results can be durable over a longer period.

Can tibial tantalum cones eventually eliminate the adjuvant use of metallic augments for AORI type 2B/3 metaphyseal defects??—A novel surgical technique and case series

BackgroundFor extensive metaphyseal defects, the use of tantalum cones is usually combined with adjuvant stems which may be cemented/cementless and metallic bone augments for additional stability. A Tibial baseplate-Cone construct with proud tibial cones and without metallic augments has been described for AORI type 2B/3 tibial defects. MethodsA case series analysis of 6 patients with AORI type 3 defects treated with unstepped proud Tantalum tibial metaphyseal cones without metallic wedges/full width augments. A follow-up analysis done with clinico-radiographic interpretation. Results100% osteointegration noted in final radiographs of all patients at an average follow-up of 4.1 years. Preoperative average ROM/KSS of 75/49 improved to postoperative ROM/KSS of 104/79. Outcomes were interpreted as excellent in 50% of cases and good in the remaining 50%. ConclusionThe “Tibial base plate-cone without augments (BCCA)”type of a construct may offer a valid long term advantage over the Tibial base plate-Augment-Cone combination in massive tibial bone defects. Simply building up the tantalum cone to the native joint line position by increasing cone height can exclude use of augments or wedges.

Development and Verification of Novel Porous Titanium Metaphyseal Cones for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundPorous metaphyseal cones are widely used in revision knee arthroplasty. A new system of porous titanium metaphyseal cones has been designed based on the femoral and tibial morphology derived from a computed tomography–based anatomical database. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the initial mechanical stability of the new porous titanium revision cone system by measuring the micromotion under physiologic loading compared with a widely-used existing porous tantalum metaphyseal cone system. MethodsThe new cones were designed to precisely fit the femoral and tibial anatomy, and 3D printing technology was used to manufacture these porous titanium cones. The stability of the new titanium cones and the widely-used tantalum cones were compared under physiologic loading conditions in bench top test model. ResultsThe stability of the new titanium cones was either equivalent or better than the tantalum cones. The new titanium femoral cone construct had significantly less micromotion compared with the traditional femoral cone construct in 5 of the 12 directions measured (P < .05), whereas no statistical difference was found in 7 directions. The new porous titanium metaphyseal tibial cones demonstrated less micromotion in medial varus/valgus (P = .004) and posterior compressive micromotion (P = .002) compared with the traditional porous tantalum system. ConclusionThe findings of this biomechanical study demonstrate satisfactory mechanical stability of an anatomical-based porous titanium metaphyseal cone system for femoral and tibial bone loss as measured by micromotion under physiologic loading. The new cone design, in combination with instrumentation that facilitates surgical efficiency, is encouraging. Long-term clinical follow-up is warranted.

Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones for Severe Tibial Bone Loss in Revision Knee Arthroplasty

Severe metaphyseal and meta-diaphyseal bone loss poses important challenges in revision total knee arthroplasty. The best strategy for addressing massive tibial bone loss has not been determined. The purpose of this study was to assess the intermediate-term clinical and radiographic results of porous tibial cone implantation. Sixty-six porous tantalum tibial cones (sixty-three patients) were reviewed at a mean follow-up time of seventy months (range, sixty to 106 months). According to the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute bone defect classification, twenty-four knees had a Type-3 defect, twenty-five knees had a Type-2B defect, and seventeen knees had a Type-2A defect. The mean age at the time of the index revision was sixty-seven years (range, forty-one to eighty-three years), and 57% of patients were female. The mean American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status was 2.4 (range, 2 to 3), and the mean body mass index was 33 kg/m(2) (range, 25 to 53 kg/m(2)). Fifteen patients (24%) were on immunosuppressant medications, and eight patients (13%) were current smokers. The patients underwent a mean number of 3.4 prior knee surgical procedures (range, one to twenty procedures), and 49% of patients (thirty-one patients) had a history of periprosthetic infection. The mean Knee Society Scores improved significantly from 55 points preoperatively (range, 4 to 97 points) to 80 points (range, 28 to 100 points) at the time of the latest follow-up (p < 0.0001). One patient had progressive radiolucencies about the tibial stem and cone on radiographs. One patient had complete radiolucencies about the tibial cone, concerning for fibrous ingrowth. Three other cones were revised: one for infection, one for aseptic loosening, and one for periprosthetic fracture. Revision-free survival of the tibial cone component was >95% at the time of the latest follow-up. Porous tantalum tibial cones offer a promising management option for severe tibial bone loss. At the intermediate-term follow-up (five to nine years), porous tantalum tibial cones had durable clinical results and radiographic fixation. The biologic ingrowth of these implants offers the potential for successful long-term structural support in complex knee reconstruction.

Tantalum Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Promising Short-Term Result With 29 Cones in 21 Patients

Twenty-nine porous tantalum metaphyseal cones were implanted in 21 patients (14 women and 7 men) during revision TKA. The average age at the time of the procedure was 73.3years. Sixteen revisions were considered aseptic and 5 were reimplantations after sepsis. Eight patients had stemmed revision implants and thirteen primary designs. According to the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute bone defect classification, femoral defects were rated as F3 in 14 knees and F2B in 3 knees. Tibial defects were rated as T2A in 3 cases, T2B in 3 cases and T3 in 5 cases. A femoral cone was inserted in 10 patients, a double cone (femur and tibia) in 8, and a single tibial cone in 3. A rotating hinge knee prosthesis (RHK, Zimmer) was inserted in 10 patients and a constrained condylar prosthesis (LCCK, Zimmer) in 11 patients. The diaphysis was cemented in 9 cases and, in 11 cases, just the metaphysis. At an average follow up of 36months only one reconstruction was removed due to persistent infection. All metaphyseal cones showed evidence of stable osseointegration. According to the Knee Society Score the results were rated as excellent in 12 cases, good in 5 cases, fair in 3 and poor in 1 case. In the short term, porous tantalum metaphyseal cones provided structural support for large femoral and tibial defects. They also provided the environment for bone graft osseointegration, repair of femoral fractures and effective interdigitation of cement mantle into the trabecular metal cone.

Use of a trabecular metal implant in ankle arthrodesis after failed total ankle replacement

Background and purpose Arthrodesis after failed total ankle replacement is complicated and delayed union, nonunion, and shortening of the leg often occur—especially with large bone defects. We investigated the use of a trabecular metal implant and a retrograde intramedullary nail to obtain fusion.Patients and methods 13 patients with a migrated or loose total ankle implant underwent arthrodesis with the use of a retrograde intramedullary nail through a trabecular metal Tibial Cone. The mean follow-up time was 1.4 (0.6–3.4) years.Results At the last examination, 7 patients were pain-free, while 5 had some residual pain but were satisfied with the procedure. 1 patient was dissatisfied and experienced pain and swelling when walking. The implant-bone interfaces showed no radiographic zones or gaps in any patient, indicating union.Interpretation The method is a new way of simplifying and overcoming some of the problems of performing arthrodesis after failed total ankle replacement.

Use of Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones for Severe Tibial Bone Loss During Revision Total Knee Replacement

The best treatment method for large tibial bone defects during revision knee replacement has not been established. The purpose of this study was to determine the initial results obtained with a unique reconstructive implant, the porous tantalum metaphyseal cone, designed as an alternative treatment for severe tibial bone loss following total knee arthroplasty. Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones were implanted during fifteen revision total knee replacements in eight women and seven men who had an average age of 68.1 years at the time of the procedure. The patients had had an average of 3.5 prior total knee replacements. According to the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute bone defect classification, eight knees had a Type-3 defect and seven knees had a Type-2B bone defect. All patients were followed clinically and radiographically. The patients were followed for an average of thirty-four months (range, twenty-four to forty-seven months). Overall, the average Knee Society clinical scores improved from 52 points preoperatively to 85 points at the time of the final follow-up. At the final follow-up evaluation, all fifteen porous metaphyseal cones showed evidence of osseointegration with reactive osseous trabeculation at points of contact with the tibia. There was no evidence of loosening or migration of any of these tibial reconstructions at the time of final follow-up. At the time of short-term follow-up, the porous tantalum metaphyseal tibial cones effectively provided structural support for the tibial implants in this series. The potential for long-term biologic fixation may provide durability for these tibial reconstructions. Long-term follow-up and comparison with alternative reconstructive techniques will be required to evaluate the true effectiveness of this treatment approach.

Porous Tantalum Cones for Large Metaphyseal Tibial Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

Sixteen cases of revision total knee arthroplasty requiring the use of porous tantalum tibial cones for 2 T2A, 3 T2B, 4 T3A, and 7 T3B tibial bone defects (Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute classification) after 13 cases of aseptic loosening and 3 cases of staged reimplantation for infection were reviewed. At an average 31 months (24-38), no patients were lost to follow-up. There were 2 cases of recurrent sepsis requiring removal of a well-fixed cone. In the remaining 14 cases, the reconstructions were functioning well with no reoperations. Radiographs demonstrated reestablishment of the joint line, neutral mechanical axis (average, 5.4° of valgus), and signs of stable osteointegration into the cones. Good short-term results were achieved in complex revisions, with these new reconstructive tools.

Use of Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones for Severe Tibial Bone Loss During Revision Total Knee Replacement

The best treatment method for large tibial bone defects during revision knee replacement has not been established. The purpose of this study was to determine the initial results obtained with a unique reconstructive implant, the porous tantalum metaphyseal cone, designed as an alternative treatment for severe tibial bone loss following total knee arthroplasty. Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones were implanted during fifteen revision total knee replacements in eight women and seven men who had an average age of 68.1 years at the time of the procedure. The patients had had an average of 3.5 prior total knee replacements. According to the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute bone defect classification, eight knees had a Type-3 defect and seven knees had a Type-2B bone defect. All patients were followed clinically and radiographically. The patients were followed for an average of thirty-four months (range, twenty-four to forty-seven months). Overall, the average Knee Society clinical scores improved from 52 points preoperatively to 85 points at the time of the final follow-up. At the final follow-up evaluation, all fifteen porous metaphyseal cones showed evidence of osseointegration with reactive osseous trabeculation at points of contact with the tibia. There was no evidence of loosening or migration of any of these tibial reconstructions at the time of final follow-up. At the time of short-term follow-up, the porous tantalum metaphyseal tibial cones effectively provided structural support for the tibial implants in this series. The potential for long-term biologic fixation may provide durability for these tibial reconstructions. Long-term follow-up and comparison with alternative reconstructive techniques will be required to evaluate the true effectiveness of this treatment approach.

Management of Bone Loss

Trabecular metal augmentation has added new treatment options for severe proximal tibial bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty. Porous tantalum tibial cones provide mechanical support for the tibial component and have the potential for long-term biologic fixation. These cones facilitate restoration of the proximal tibia metaphysis in Type 2 and 3 defects. Ten tantalum tibial cones were press-fit into the prepared cavitary defect of a series of revision knee arthroplasties. Voids between the cone and host bone were filled with morselized grafting material. The core tibial component was cemented into the implanted tibial cone; fixation was enhanced with stem extensions, which were press-fit in four knees and cemented in six knees. Extensions ranged from 75-200 mm with length dependent upon the residual bone quality. Offset stems were used in 3 tibias. At follow-up (average 10 months), radiographic evaluation revealed no evidence of loosening or change in position. Strength, range of motion, and stability were comparable to previously reported series of revision arthroplasties. Trabecular metal cones can help reconstruct large cavitary defects and, along with stem extensions and offset stems, may eliminate the need for extensive bone grafting or structural allograft in revision knee arthroplasty. Therapeutic study, level V (expert opinion). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.