Tibial Component Research Articles

Utilizing Stems in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Analysis of the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Data

BackgroundWe compared revision rates and reasons for revision for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed for osteoarthritis with and without tibial stem extensions. MethodsData from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry were used to compare all-cause revision, reason, and type of revision between primary TKA using stemmed tibial prostheses and non-stemmed prostheses. ResultsAll-cause revision for TKA with stem extension was higher for the first 6 months (hazard ratio [HR] 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]1.19 to 1.82; P < .001); while after 1.5 years TKA with stem extension had a lower rate of revision (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.73 to 0.97; P = .01). Stemmed components were more likely to be revised for infection between 3 months and 1.5 years after surgery (HR 1.39; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.83; P = .02). The revision rate for aseptic loosening was lower in the stemmed group beyond 2 years (HR = 0.45; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.63; P < .001). Insert-only revision was higher in the stemmed group at all times (HR = 1.42; 95% CI 1.21 to 1.66, P < .001). Isolated tibial component revision was lower in the stemmed group at all times (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.74; P = .001). Aseptic loosening for tibial component-only revision was significantly lower in the stemmed group at all times (HR 0.23; 95% CI 0.11 to 0.50; P < .001). ConclusionsPatients undergoing primary stemmed TKA have lower rates of all-cause revision beyond 1.5 years and tibial component-only revision at all times. Further investigation is required to preoperatively select patients that benefit from augmentation with stems.

Randomized controlled trial comparing traditional versus enhanced-fixation designs of a novel cemented total knee arthroplasty tibial component.

A novel enhanced cement fixation (EF) tibial implant with deeper cement pockets and a more roughened bonding surface was released to market for an existing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) system.This randomized controlled trial assessed fixation of the both the EF (ATTUNE S+) and standard (Std; ATTUNE S) using radiostereometric analysis. Overall, 50 subjects were randomized (21 EF-TKA and 23 Std-TKA in the final analysis), and had follow-up visits at six weeks, and six, 12, and 24 months to assess migration of the tibial component. Low viscosity bone cement with tobramycin was used in a standardized fashion for all subjects. Patient-reported outcome measure data was captured at preoperative and all postoperative visits. The patient cohort mean age was 66 years (SD seven years), 59% were female, and the mean BMI was 32 kg/m2 (SD 6 kg/m2). Mean two-year subsidence of the EF-TKA was 0.056 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.025 to 0.086) versus 0.006 mm (95% CI -0.029 to 0.040) for the Std-TKA, and the two-year maximum total point motion (MTPM) was 0.285 mm (95% upper confidence limit (UCL) ≤ 0.363) versus 0.346 mm (95% UCL ≤ 0.432), respectively, for a mean difference of -0.061 mm (95% CI -0.196 to 0.074). Inducible displacement also did not differ between groups. The MTPMs between 12 and 24 months for each group was below the published threshold of 0.2 mm for predicting early aseptic loosening (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Both the enhanced fixation and the standard tibial implant design showed fixation with a predicted low risk of long-term aseptic loosening.

Safe bearing region for avoiding meniscal bearing impingement and overhang in mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

The purposes of this study were to propose a quantitative method of bearing overhang to minimize the effect of bearing spinning on mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MB UKA), suggest and apply safe bearing regions in daily activities. The overhang distance and area were calculated for neutral and spinning positions. The safe bearing regions were based on the relationship between bearing overhang and linear wear rate. Eleven patients were included in an in-vivo experiment under dual fluoroscopic imaging following medial MB UKA. The bearing position was tracked by minimal joint space width, and the bearing overhang was calculated accordingly. Due to an equal contribution of 1 mm increase in medial overhang and 30 mm2 overhang areato wear rate, the maximum effect of potential bearing spinning on medial overhang distance was approximately three times as large as the overhang area. The safe bearing distance and area regions were rectangles and arches with different scales for different size combinations of bearing, femoral and tibial components. The maximum bearing overhang area during lunge (R = 0.76, p = 0.006) and open-chain exercise (R = 0.68, p = 0.02) significantly correlated with the overhang area in standing. The overhang area can be an appropriate parameter for evaluating dislocation degree less affected by potential bearing spinning than the overhang distance in clinical practice. The corresponding safe overhang area regions were proposed for surgical planning and postoperative dislocation degree evaluation. The bearing overhang area in static standing posture can be a valuable reference to estimate the dynamic overhang area and dislocation degree during motion.

Varus placement of the tibial component reduces the potential risk of fracture with adequate bony coverage in the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

A short keel-cortex distance (KCD), especially to the posterior cortex, is a potential risk factor for tibial plateau fracture after Oxford mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (OUKA). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of tibial component alignment in the coronal plane and tibial proximal morphology on the KCD. Included in this study were 51 patients scheduled for primary Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The anterior and posterior KCD were preoperatively assessed using 3D simulation software with the component set perpendicular to the tibial mechanical axis (neutral), 3° valgus, 3° varus, and 6° varus, relative to neutral alignment. We evaluated the existence of overhanging medial tibial condyle where the medial eminence line, the line including the medial tibial eminence parallel to the tibial axis, passes outside of the tibial shaft. In all component alignments, patients with a medial overhanging condyle had significantly shorter posterior KCD than those without. In patients with a medial overhanging condyle, the posterior KCD significantly increased when the tibial component was placed in 3° varus (4.6 ± 1.5 mm, P = 0.003 vs neutral, P < 0.001 vs 3° valgus) and 6° varus (5.0 ± 1.4 mm, P < 0.001 vs neutral, P < 0.001 vs 3° valgus) compared with in neutral (3.5 ± 1.9 mm) or 3° valgus (2.8 ± 1.8 mm). In OUKA, varus implantation increased the KCD. This could potentially decrease the risk of fracture, even in knees with the overhanging medial condyle. Conversely, valgus implantation of the tibial component shortened the KCD, and should therefore be avoided.

Undersizing of the tibial component in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) increases the risk of periprosthetic fractures.

Tibial periprosthetic fractures (TPF) after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are a rare condition that affects about 1% of cases. Known risk factors include age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and bone density, as well as surgical technique and prosthesis design. The purpose of the study was to determine if undersizing of the tibial component in relation to the femoral component increases the risk of tibial periprosthetic fractures. Over a 6-year-period 1542 patients with cemented (n = 363) and uncemented (n = 1179) medial UKA were retrospectively evaluated. Tibial periprosthetic fractures were identified and classified, and epidemiologic data were documented at follow-up. Undersizing was defined as a smaller tibial component compared to the femoral implant. The association of potential risk factors for TPF with the incidence of TPF was investigated with binominal logistic regression. Fourteen patients (0.9%) suffered from TPF at a median of 1month after surgery. The mean follow-up period was 5.9 ± 1.7years. Fractures were more common in cases with undersized tibial components [odds ratio (OR) 3.2, p < 0.05]. Furthermore, older age (OR 1.1, p < 0.05) and female sex (OR 6.5, p < 0.05) were identified as significant risk factors, while BMI (p = 0.8) and cemented implantation (p = 0.2) had no effect on fracture rate. Revision surgery included open reduction and internal fixation or conversion to total knee arthroplasty. Undersizing of implant sizes in UKA increases the risk for TPF especially in patients with small tibial implants. Therefore, mismatched implants should be avoided for UKA particularly when risk factors like obesity, older age, or female gender are present. Tibial periprosthetic fractures were successfully treated by open reduction and internal fixation or conversion to total knee arthroplasty.

Can Asymmetry in Total Knee Arthroplasty Design Lead to More Normal-Like Postoperative Kinematics? A Multi-Implant Evaluation

BackgroundFew studies have evaluated the effects of symmetrical versus asymmetrical implant designs, more specifically the femoral condyles, trochlear groove, joint line, and bearing surfaces. The objective of this study was to investigate multiple posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs influencing factors related to TKA asymmetry, and to investigate whether asymmetry can improve postoperative knee kinematics. MethodsIn vivo tibio-femoral kinematics for 99 subjects was evaluated in this retrospective study. Overall, 10 subjects had a nonimplanted, normal knee, and 89 subjects had 1 of 3 PCR TKAs with varying degrees of asymmetry within their femoral and tibial components (PCR #1 = 30, PCR #2 = 29, PCR #3 = 30). All TKAs were implanted by the same surgeon and were analyzed using fluoroscopy during a deep knee bend. ResultsAt full extension, all 3 PCR TKAs experienced a more posteriorized position of the femoral condyles compared to the normal knee, with the 2 asymmetrical PCR TKAs experiencing more anteriorization compared to the third, symmetrical PCR TKA. Both the normal knee and the PCR TKA with greatest amount of asymmetry experienced statistically more posterior femoral rollback of the lateral condyle than the other 2 PCR TKAs. The PCR TKA with greater asymmetry also experienced statistically greater range of motion than the other 2 PCR TKAs. ConclusionsWith increasing flexion, the design with the most asymmetry also experienced the most posterior femoral rollback, axial rotation, and greatest range of motion. The results in this study seem to suggest that the inclusion of asymmetry in a TKA could be beneficial for achieving more normal-like kinematics and greater weight-bearing knee flexion.

Prediction of knee biomechanics with different tibial component malrotations after total knee arthroplasty: conventional machine learning vs. deep learning.

The precise alignment of tibiofemoral components in total knee arthroplasty is a crucial factor in enhancing the longevity and functionality of the knee. However, it is a substantial challenge to quickly predict the biomechanical response to malrotation of tibiofemoral components after total knee arthroplasty using musculoskeletal multibody dynamics models. The objective of the present study was to conduct a comparative analysis between a deep learning method and four conventional machine learning methods for predicting knee biomechanics with different tibial component malrotation during a walking gait after total knee arthroplasty. First, the knee contact forces and kinematics with different tibial component malrotation in the range of ±5° in the three directions of anterior/posterior slope, internal/external rotation, and varus/valgus rotation during a walking gait after total knee arthroplasty were calculated based on the developed musculoskeletal multibody dynamics model. Subsequently, deep learning and four conventional machine learning methods were developed using the above 343 sets of biomechanical data as the dataset. Finally, the results predicted by the deep learning method were compared to the results predicted by four conventional machine learning methods. The findings indicated that the deep learning method was more accurate than four conventional machine learning methods in predicting knee contact forces and kinematics with different tibial component malrotation during a walking gait after total knee arthroplasty. The deep learning method developed in this study enabled quickly determine the biomechanical response with different tibial component malrotation during a walking gait after total knee arthroplasty. The proposed method offered surgeons and surgical robots the ability to establish a calibration safety zone, which was essential for achieving precise alignment in both preoperative surgical planning and intraoperative robotic-assisted surgical navigation.

OPTIMIZING THE TIBIAL KEEL SLOT FOR THE OXFORD UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

Tibial periprosthetic fracture is an important complication of the Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (OUKR). Primary fixation of cementless OUKR tibial components relies on the interference-fit of the ‘keel’ and a slot in the proximal tibia. Clinically used double blade keel saws (DKS) create slots with two grooves, generating stress concentrations where fractures may initiate. This study aimed to investigate slot factors that may influence incidence of tibial periprosthetic fractures.Slots were made in PCF20 polyurethane foam using the DKS plus/minus adjuvant rasping, single blade keel saw (SKS), and rasp-only. Round and square slots were machined with milling cutters. Compact tensile tests were conducted per ASTM E399 to determine tensile load to fracture (TLTF) and results were validated using bovine tibia. Cementless OUKR components were implanted into slots in custom polyurethane blocks and compressed to failure to determine anatomical load to fracture (ALTF). A custom MATLAB program calculated slot roundness from cross-sectional images.Round slots had higher TLTF (29.5N, SD=2.7) than square (25.2N, SD=1.7, p&lt;0.05) and DKS slots (23.3N, SD=2.7, p&lt;0.0001). Fractures occurred at the round slot apices, square slot corners, and deepest DKS slot grooves. ALTF was not significantly different between square and round slots. Adjuvant rasping made DKS slots significantly rounder, resulting in significantly higher TLTF, but rasping did not increase ALTF. ALTF was significantly higher for SKS (850N, SD=133, p&lt;0.01) and rasp-only (912N, SD=100, p&lt;0.001) slots compared to standard DKS slots (703N, SD=81).Round keel slots minimise stress concentrations and increase TLTF but do not increase ALTF. The SKS and rasp-only slots retain material at slot ends and have significantly higher ALTF. Future studies should assess saw blades that retain material and round slot ends to evaluate if their use may significantly reduce the incidence of tibial periprosthetic fracture.

INCIDENCE AND SURGICAL TREATMENT OF COMPONENT BREAKAGE AFTER UNICOMPARTMENTAL AND TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: A SINGLE-CENTRE LONG-TERM EXPERIENCE

Fractures of the prosthetic components after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are rare but dangerous complications, sometimes difficult to diagnose and to manage. Aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence of component breakage and its treatment in our single institution's experience. We retrospectively review our institution registry. From 605 revision knee arthroplasties since 2000 to 2018, we found 8 cases of component breakage, of these 3 belonged to UKA, and 5 belonged to TKA. The UKA fractures were all on the metal tibial component; while 4 TKA fractures were ascribed to the liner (2 Posterior-Stabilized designs and 2 constrained designs) and only one case was on the femoral component. For every patient a revision procedure was performed, in two cases a tibial tubercle osteotomy was performed, while in one case (where the fracture was of the post cam) an arthroscopy was performed prior to the arthrotomy. All of the UKA fractures were treated with a standard revision implant. As regard the TKA, 2 liner fractures were treated with the only liner exchange, while the other 2 liner fractures and the fracture of the metallic component were treated with total knee revision. No intra- and post-operative complications were found. Component breakage after TKA is a serious complication. Its treatment, always surgical, can hide pitfalls, especially if the timing is not correct; indeed apart from the revision of one or more components, the surgeons must address any issues of management of bone defect and ligamentous stability.

Flexion contracture can cause component mismatch in the Prophecy® preoperative patient-specific instrumentation for Evolution® medial-pivot knee system.

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) systems are used to conduct total knee arthroplasty. PSI reduces operative time, is less invasive and easier to use, and minimizes the risk of errors by providing precise measurements and reducing operating room turnover time. However, a study on the accuracy of Prophecy Evolution PSI (Microport Inc., Arlington, TN, USA) reported that 94% were below the error margin of 1.5mm and 90% had error margins of 1mm. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the Prophecy Evolution PSI system in terms of the thickness of "total" bony resection required to achieve adequate extension/flexion gaps and the component match ratio between preoperative planning and actual component size inserted. Comparisons were made between the sizes of femoral and tibial components planned with PSI and those inserted. The primary outcome was the average preoperative range of motion with and without matched femoral/tibial components. The study further analyzed the proportions of cases in which both the femoral and tibial components matched, neither matched, and only one of the femoral or tibial components matched. The ratio of the same sizes between the PSI planning and those inserted was 50.8% (33 patients) for both the femoral and tibial components. For the femoral component alone, the ratio was 84.6% (55 patients), and for the tibial component, it was 58.4% (38 patients). A receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that flexion contracture greater than 20° was a significant prognostic factor for the PSI component match group versus the mismatch group. Flexion contracture may cause PSI mismatch. Notably, flexion contracture greater than 20° was a significant risk factor for the PSI component match group versus the mismatch group. During preoperative planning for a patient with flexion contracture, surgeons should prepare for the possibility of inserting an undersized tibial component.

Can Isolated Tibial Component Revision Be an Alternative to Isolated Aseptic Loosening of the Tibial Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty?

This article reviews the information on isolated tibial component revision for isolated aseptic loosening of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It summarizes the results of recent major studies published in PubMed since the beginning of the search engine until 28 March 2023. Sixty-five articles were found, of which only five were analyzed because they were directly related to the title of this article. At 5-year follow-up isolated tibial revision and both-component (femoral and tibial) revision for aseptic loosening did not differ with regard to failures of the implant, adverse events, and clinical outcomes.

Long-Term Outcomes of High-Flexion Design Total Knee Arthroplasty with a Short Posterior Flange.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of high-flexion total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using Vega Knee System (B. Braun, Aesculap) at a long-term follow-up and to analyze the implant survivorship. We enrolled 165 patients (232 knees) with a minimum 7-year follow-up after TKA (VEGA Knee System). For clinical assessment, range of motion (ROM), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were used. For radiologic assessment, hip-knee-ankle angle, component position, and the existence of radiolucent lines and loosening were used. Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. The mean follow-up period was 9.8 years. The mean ROM increased from 124.4° to 131.4° at the final follow-up. The WOMAC score decreased from 38.5 to 17.4 at the final follow-up (p < 0.001). All 5 subscales of the KOOS improved at the final follow-up (all subscales, p < 0.001). Revision TKA was performed in 10 cases (4.3%), which included 9 cases of aseptic loosing and 1 case of periprostatic joint infection. Of the 9 aseptic loosening cases (3.9%), 8 cases (3.4%) were loosening of the femoral component and 1 case (0.4%) was loosening of the tibial component. When revision for any reason was considered an endpoint, the 10-year survivorship was 96.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.9%-98.5%). On the other hand, when revision for aseptic loosening was considered the endpoint, the 10-year survivorship was 96.6% (95% CI, 94.4%-98.8%). The Vega Knee System provided good clinical results in the long-term follow-up period. Although the VEGA Knee System showed acceptable implant survivorship, loosening of the femoral component occurred in about 3.4% of the patients. For more accurate evaluation of the survivorship of high-flexion design TKA with a short posterior flange, it is necessary to conduct more long-term follow-up studies targeting diverse races, especially Asians who frequently perform high-flexion activities.

A Novel Approach to Total Ankle Arthroplasty with Simultaneous Structural Tibial Cut Autograft for Anterior Tibial Bone Defects.

Severe bone defects pose a clinical challenge in total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) and are frequently considered contraindicated. We introduce an innovative approach that utilizes a structural tibial cut autograft to address anterior distal tibia bone defects during TAA. This technique is a viable alternative to employing revision TAA systems or resorting to excessively high tibial cuts. Furthermore, it facilitates achieving favorable sagittal alignment and ensures adequate fixation strength of the tibial component.

Painful Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Etiology, Diagnosis and Management.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an increasingly common procedure. Patients with persistent or new postoperative pain can present a challenge for surgeons to accurately diagnose and treat. The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive review of the presentation, diagnosis, and management of the various pathologies contributing to pain after UKA. The most common causes of a painful UKA include aseptic component loosening and progression of osteoarthritis. Both of these conditions may be treated with either revision UKA or conversion to total knee arthroplasty. While technically challenging, these procedures are often associated with favorable outcomes. Other causes of pain after UKA include infection, atraumatic tibial component subsidence, periprosthetic fracture and malalignment. Careful clinical, radiographic, and laboratory evaluation is therefore critical to accurately identify the source of pain and guide appropriate management.

Periprosthetic Osteolysis (PPOL) Following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) Treated with Hybrid Semiconstrained Prosthetic Revision: A Case Report

Periprosthetic Osteolysis (PPOL) is a significant complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKR), often leading to the need for surgical revisions. The precise etiology of aseptic loosening and PPOL remains unclear, but it is a growing problem due to an aging population and increased demand for TKR implants. A 70-year-old female presented with left knee pain following a fall. She had previously undergone left and right TKR due to osteoarthritis. X-rays revealed a dislodged femoral prosthesis component and bone lysis, indicating PPOL. The patient had poor bone quality and was at risk for further complications. Due to insurance limitations, a hybrid revision technique was chosen, preserving the tibial component and enhancing the femoral aspect with a new augmented implant. Periprosthetic osteolysis is complex, and treatment options can be limited by financial constraints, such as insurance coverage. In this case, the decision to perform an isolated femoral component revision was made to reduce costs, with close follow-up and rehabilitation planned to prevent complications. Hybrid revision requires careful monitoring. PPOL restoration necessitates immediate action and rehabilitation to promote optimal joint function. This case highlights the importance of balancing medical judgment and financial constraints, and the potential for hybrid revision in specific cases. It also emphasizes the need for a harmonious relationship between healthcare professionals and healthcare management for patient safety and satisfaction. Keywords: Complication; Hybrid revision; Periprosthetic osteolysis; Total knee arthroplasty.

An observational study on the functional outcomes of 100 robotic total knee replacements performed by an Indian surgeon: Early experiences

Abstract Background: We aim to share our preliminary encounter with robotic knee replacements in Indian patients, focusing on the initial 100 cases. This report will delve into our observations regarding the learning curve and provide insights from a short-term follow-up at 6 months. Materials and Methods: Following institutional ethical clearance, we conducted an observational study involving 100 robotic-assisted total knee replacement cases performed from March 2022 to November 2022. These patients underwent a 6-month follow-up to evaluate functional outcomes. Our primary objective was to investigate the learning curve associated with robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA), specifically emphasizing operative time. Furthermore, we examined preoperative and postoperative alignment parameters as part of our analysis. Results: In our investigation, participants had a mean age of 64.68 years, with a female-to-male ratio of 43:22 and an average body mass index of 30.71 ± 4.88. Intraoperative blood loss was recorded at an average of 91.81 ± 21.63 mL. The mean surgical duration for the initial 25 cases was 102.5 ± 11.08 min, which improved to 65.65 ± 13.07 min for the subsequent 75 cases. The average hospital stay length was 2.88 ± 0.88 days. Notably, there was a significant enhancement in the Knee Society Score (KSS), with a preoperative mean of 38.90 ± 12.72 improving to a postoperative mean of 84.89 ± 4.10 (P = 0.001), as well as in the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), which saw a rise from 16.62 ± 16.42 preoperatively to 45.58 ± 4.97 postoperatively (P = 0.001). The accuracy of preoperative determination for femoral component sizes was 100%, while for tibial component sizing, it was 97%. Conclusion: The key finding from this observational study suggests that around 25 procedures are required to reach a learning plateau. During this process, an average decrease of 36.1 min in surgical time was observed from the initial to proficient stages. Notably, no learning curve was observed for lower limb alignment and implant placement, and no significant complication rates were documented.

The Impact of Tibial Component Material on Outcomes After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The Impact of Tibial Component Material on Outcomes After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

KINEMATIC ALIGNMENT TECHNIQUE IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY CHANGES FEMORAL SIZING

Introduction: Kinematic alignment (KA) is an innovative approach designed to restore natural knee kinematics in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). Unlike traditional mechanical alignment (MA), which focuses on aligning the femur and tibia along a mechanical axis, KA considers the three axes governing the movement of the patella and tibia relative to the femur. This difference leads to variations in femoral sizing between the two techniques. KA has shown to significantly reduce femoral size compared to MA in TKA patients. Material and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the records of 323 patients who underwent TKA from 2017 to 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: 177 received KA, and 146 received MA. Data on femoral and tibial component sizes were collected. The primary objective was to compare differences in femoral and tibial sizing between the groups. The mean difference in femoral size was calculated. Demographic data were used to predict the expected femoral size for a subset of patients, comparing predicted to actual sizes. Discrepancies were analyzed between KA and MA groups. Results: Femoral sizing differed significantly between groups. In the KA group, 10.7% needed a smaller femoral size than tibial, 51.4% had equal sizes, and 37.9% needed a larger femoral size. In the MA group, 1.3% needed a smaller femoral size, 28.8% had equal sizes, and 69.9% needed a larger femoral size (p&lt;0.001). The mean femoral size difference was significant: 0.29 for KA and 0.62 for MA (p&lt;0.001). KA more often resulted in a smaller-than-predicted femoral size than MA (68.7% vs. 53.6%, p&lt;0.05). Conclusions: This study highlights the significant impact of KA on femoral sizing in TKA. KA leads to a greater proportion of patients requiring smaller femoral components compared to MA. The substantial difference in femoral sizing distributions between the groups (p&lt;0.001) underscores the importance of considering alignment techniques in preoperative planning and component selection for TKA.

A Three-dimensional Comparison of Pre- and Post-component Position in a Series of Off-label Robotic-assisted Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties

BackgroundThe application of robotic-assisted arthroplasty in revision knee scenarios continues to evolve. This study compares the pre- and post-revision implant positions in series of revision total knee arthroplasties (TKA) using a robotic arm system. MethodsTwenty-five consecutive off-label robotic-assisted revision TKA were performed. After virtual revision femoral and tibial components were positioned to achieve “balanced” medial and lateral flexion and extension gaps, the existing primary implants (PI) were removed, and bone cuts were executed with the robotic arm system. Preoperative coronal, sagittal, and axial position of the PI was compared to the final planned positions of the robotic revision implants (RRI) for each subject. A repeated measures ANOVA using the absolute difference in millimeters and degrees between the PI and RRI orientation was completed. ResultsIntra-operatively, the virtual gaps were balanced within the planning software followed by successful execution of the plan. There was a statistically significant difference between posterior condylar offset and tibial component positioning for RRI compared to PI. There was no difference between the distal femoral component values between PI and RRI. ConclusionsThe sagittal alignment of the revision implants, specifically the femoral posterior condylar offset and tibial component slope, are statistically significant considerations for a stable revision TKA with off-label use of a robotic-arm system. Other potential benefits may include appropriate implant sizing which can affect the resultant ligamentous tension important for a functional revision TKA. Future research and software iterations will be needed to determine the overall accuracy and utility of robotic-assisted revision TKA.

Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Preoperative Planning and Patient-Specific Instrumentation System for Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Accurate preoperative planning for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is crucial. Computed tomography (CT)-based preoperative planning offers more comprehensive information and can also be used to design patient-specific instrumentation (PSI), but it requires well-reconstructed and segmented images, and the process is complex and time-consuming. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) preoperative planning and PSI system for TKA and to validate its time savings and accuracy in clinical applications. The 3D-UNet and modified HRNet neural network structures were used to develop the AI preoperative planning and PSI system (AIJOINT). Forty-two patients who were scheduled for TKA underwent both AI and manual CT processing and planning for component sizing, 20 of whom had their PSIs designed and applied intraoperatively. The time consumed and the size and orientation of the postoperative component were recorded. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and loss function indicated excellent performance of the neural network structure in CT image segmentation. AIJOINT was faster than conventional methods for CT segmentation (3.74 ± 0.82 vs. 128.88 ± 17.31 min, p < 0.05) and PSI design (35.10 ± 3.98 vs. 159.52 ± 17.14 min, p < 0.05) without increasing the time for size planning. The accuracy of AIJOINT in planning the size of both femoral and tibial components was 92.9%, while the accuracy of the conventional method in planning the size of the femoral and tibial components was 42.9% and 47.6%, respectively (p < 0.05). In addition, AI-based PSI improved the accuracy of the hip-knee-ankle angle and reduced postoperative blood loss (p < 0.05). AIJOINT significantly reduces the time needed for CT processing and PSI design without increasing the time for size planning, accurately predicts the component size, and improves the accuracy of lower limb alignment in TKA patients, providing a meaningful supplement to the application of AI in orthopaedics.