Introduction: Portal venous system thrombosis (PVST) typically occurs in liver cirrhosis, cancer, or intra-abdominal inflammation. Some patients do not present an etiological factor in which thrombophilia must be discarded, but an extensive thrombophilia workup in low and middle-income countries is hardly ever affordable. Therefore, this study aims to assess the long-term outcomes in patients with PVST with or without thrombophilia in a middle-income country. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study that included all the patients with a PSVT diagnosis from January 2000 to December 2021 in a tertiary care hospital in Mexico City. Patients with cirrhosis, cancer, and intra-abdominal inflammatory conditions were excluded. We included patients without an etiological factor that had a work up of thrombophilia, including antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), JAK2 mutation, prothrombin gene mutation (G20210A), antithrombin III deficiency, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), protein C and protein S deficiency and Factor V Leiden. Patients were divided into 2 groups, those with thrombophilia and those with a negative thrombophilia workup (idiopathic). We assessed the clinical features and outcomes until the last follow-up in these groups and variables associated with thrombosis and bleeding. Results: A total of 80 patients were included. The median age was 39 years (31-52), and 50% were male. Thrombophilia was documented in 45 (56.2%): APS in 48.8%, JAK2 mutation in 28.8%, protein S deficiency 22%, prothrombin gene mutation (G20210A) 13%, protein C deficiency 11.1%, Factor V Leiden 4.4%, and more than one thrombophilia was found in 4 patients. 35% (28 patients) had experienced previous venous thrombosis. Thrombosis limited to the portal vein was the most frequent in both groups (thrombophilia 48.9%, idiopathic 42.9%, p=0.591), followed by porto-mesenteric involvement (thrombophilia 46.7% vs idiopathic 42.9%, p=0.734). Patients were followed-up for a median of 53.5 months (26.7-96.7). Regarding the duration of treatment 60% of patients with thrombophilia received treatment for >12 months vs. 42.9% in the idiopathic group. There were no differences regarding the type of anticoagulant received (vitamin K antagonist, low-molecular-weight heparin or direct oral anticoagulant) in patients with thrombophilia vs. the idiopathic group (42.2% vs. 36.3%, 4.4% vs. 3.8% and 24.4% vs. 27.5% respectively). The incidence of a new thrombosis was 17.8% in the thrombophilia group and 31.4% in the idiopathic group (p=0.155). Two of these were portal venous thrombosis, 10 were pulmonary embolism, 1 hepatic vein thrombosis, 2 arterial events and 2 isolated deep venous thrombosis. At diagnosis, 66.7% in the thrombophilia group had gastric or esophageal varices and 33.3% in the idiopathic group, and the prevalence at last follow-up was 97.7% in the thrombophilia group and 50.3% in the idiopathic group. A higher probability of recanalization was found in the thrombophilia group [55.3% vs 31.3%, p=0.044, OR 0.36 (0.13-0.98), CI 95%]. There were no statistically significant differences between thrombophilia and idiopathic groups regarding the prevalence of variceal bleeding (33.3% vs. 42.9%, p=0.383), or in the incidence of major bleeding (20% vs. 22.9%, p=0.757), respectively. The mortality at the last follow-up was 6.6% in the thrombophilia group and 2.8% in the idiopathic group. In the multivariate analysis, only the use of a DOAC was associated with an increased risk of thrombosis (HR 4.5 [CI 95%, 1.5-13.6]). Meanwhile, thrombocytopenia at diagnosis was associated with variceal bleeding (HR 3.9 [CI 95%, 1.2-13.0]), and the only factor associated with a decreased risk was the porto-mesenteric extension of the thrombosis (HR 0.3 [CI 95%, 0.9-1.0]). Conclusions: Clinically outcomes among patients with PSVT are not significantly different between patients with or without thrombophilia. The incidence of re-thrombosis is high in both groups; thus, some groups have suggested that long-term anticoagulation treatment will be required even in the absence of thrombophilia. Accordingly, In a limited resource setting, it could be considered to test in a priority orderingfor the antiphospholipid syndrome to determine the best anticoagulation treatment and JAK2 mutation in cases where myeloproliferative neoplasia is suspected. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal
Read full abstract