Three Times Daily Dosing Research Articles

Twice Daily Compared to Three Times Daily Hydrocortisone in Prepubertal Children with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia

Introduction: Glucocorticoid therapy in children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) must be finely balanced between optimizing adrenal control and minimizing side effects. Twice (BID) rather than three times daily (TID) hydrocortisone may provide similar adrenal control and reduce metabolic risk. We compared BID and TID regimens with respect to adrenal control, growth, and metabolic effects. Methods: A retrospective chart review (n = 128 visits, 36 individual patients) of prepubertal children with classical CAH was conducted at a tertiary care center between March 2007 and February 2020. Adrenal control, growth, and metabolic data were extracted in those taking hydrocortisone BID versus TID. Univariate generalized estimating equations models were performed to analyze the effect of dose frequency on outcomes of interest. Results: Overall, we found no difference in adrenal control (8% vs. 18% poor control) or testosterone levels (9.65 ng/dL vs. 7.62 ng/dL) between the BID versus TID groups. We detected no difference in growth velocity (6.86 vs. 6.32 cm/year) or bone age advancement (11.3 vs. 5.91 months) between the groups. There was no difference in daily steroid dose (12.1 vs. 11.7 mg/m²/day), BMI Z-score (0.43 vs. 0.31), or systolic blood pressure percentile (65.5 vs. 61.7). Conclusion: BID dosing provides similar adrenal control and does not appear to impact growth or bone age advancement. On the other hand, TID dosing does not appear to increase the metabolic side effect profile in this age-group. Dosing should be patient-centered with individualized consideration.

Unfractionated Heparin TID Dosing Regimen Is Associated With a Lower Rate of Pulmonary Embolism When Compared With BID Dosing in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) may complicate the post-operative course of patients undergoing craniotomy. While prophylaxis with unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been shown to reduce VTE rates, twice-daily (BID) and three-times-daily (TID) UFH dosing regimens have not been compared in neurosurgical procedures. The objective of this study was to explore the association between UFH dosing regimen and rates of VTE and ICH in craniotomy patients. A retrospective chart review was conducted for 159 patients at Northwestern University receiving 5000 units/0.5 mL UFH injections either BID (n= 132) or TID (n= 27). General linear regression models were run to predict rates of DVT, PE, and reoperation due to bleeding from UFH dosing regimen while controlling for age at surgery, sex, VTE history, craniotomy for tumor resection, surgery duration, length of stay, reoperation, infections, and IDH/MGMT mutations. Receiving UFH TID was significantly associated with a lower rate of PE when compared with receiving UFH BID (β= -0.121, P= 0.044; TID rate= 0%, BID rate=10.6%). UFH TID also showed a trend toward lower rates ofDVT (β= -0.0893, P= 0.295; TID rate= 18.5%, BID rate= 21.2%) when compared with UFH BID. UFH TID showed no significant difference in rate of reoperation forbleeding when compared to UFH BID (β= -0.00623, P=0.725; TID rate= 0%, BID rate= 0.8%). UFH TID dosing is associated with lower rates of PE when compared with BID dosing in patients undergoing craniotomy.

1314. Neonatal Serum Gentamicin Concentrations following Maternal Once-daily Gentamicin Dosing

BackgroundGentamicin is commonly used for peripartum infections. Given literature supporting efficacy of once-daily dosing (ODD) of 5 mg/kg for chorioamnionitis, University of Chicago Medicine made the change from three times daily dosing (TIDD) to ODD. As gentamicin readily cross the placenta, it would be expected that maternal ODD would result in higher gentamicin neonatal serum concentrations following birth.MethodsThis was a single-center, retrospective chart review of all neonates born to mothers receiving peripartum ODD gentamicin within 12 hours of delivery between October 2019 and March 2020. A STAT random gentamicin serum concentration was obtained upon admission in neonates when initiation of antibiotics was desired. Specific dosing recommendations (Table 1) were developed utilizing neonatal population-based pharmacokinetics. The primary outcome was initial neonatal gentamicin serum concentration at birth. Other outcomes were also evaluated. Results were evaluated in two groups based on neonatal serum concentrations of less than 2 mcg/mL (Group 1) versus 2 mcg/mL or greater (Group 2).Table 1: Neonatal gentamicin dosing algorithm ResultsThirty-two mother-newborn dyads were included in this study. Baseline demographics are shown in Table 2. Newborns had a median gestational age of 39.4 weeks and median birth weight of 3.39 kilograms. The mean initial gentamicin concentration was supratherapeutic at 3.06 + 1.92 mcg/mL among all newborns (Table 3). The mean maternal dose in Group 1 (n=11) was 3.52 mg/kg (3.34, 4.77) based on actual body weight and 4.78 mg/kg (4.34, 5.18) in Group 2 (n=21) (p=0.025). The median time between maternal gentamicin administration and time of delivery varied between the groups at 0.5 hours versus 2.63 hours, respectively (p=0.005). All newborn gentamicin concentrations were less than 2 mcg/mL for maternal doses given less than 1 hour prior to delivery (n=8) (Figure 1). Overall protocol compliance rate was 81.3%. There were no significant differences in nephrotoxicity or ototoxicity between groups.Table 2. Baseline Demographics Table 3. Outcomes Figure 1. Comparison of maternal gentamicin time from administration to delivery and neonatal serum gentamicin concentrations ConclusionThis study suggests peripartum ODD of gentamicin may lead to clinically significant serum concentrations in neonates if administered between 1 to 12 hours of birth. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the effects of maternal ODD of gentamicin on newborns.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Similar pharmacokinetics of three dosing regimens comprising two oral delayed-release mesalamine formulations in healthy adult volunteers: Randomised, open-label, parallel-group study.

AimsMesalamine is the first‐line therapy for treating mild‐to‐moderate ulcerative colitis. Multiple mesalamine formulations are available, with similar safety and efficacy profiles. Mesalamine is commonly administered as divided dosing, although once‐daily dosing may provide benefits for patients. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of three dosing regimens of two oral delayed‐release mesalamine formulations in healthy adult volunteers.MethodsA randomised, open‐label, parallel‐group study of mesalamine pharmacokinetics following Lialda 2 × 1.2 g once daily (QD) (dose A), Asacol 6 × 400 mg QD (dose B), or Asacol 2 × 400 mg three times daily (TID) (dose C) over 7 days. Assessments included 5‐aminosalicylic acid (5‐ASA) and N‐acetyl 5‐aminosalicylic acid (N‐Ac‐5‐ASA, primary metabolite) pharmacokinetics (A e(%), AUC0‐24 and C max), safety and tolerability.ResultsAll enrolled volunteers (n = 37) completed the study. Steady state was achieved for all treatments by day 4. Ratios (95% CI) of means for steady‐state AUC0‐24 (dose A vs B 90.3% [39.8, 204.8], dose A vs C 123.5% [55.3, 275.7], dose B vs C 136.8% [61.3, 305.5]) and C max (dose A vs B 106.0% [46.4, 242.2], dose A vs C 133.0% [59.1, 299.0], dose B vs C 125.5% [55.8, 282.1]) were similar for all 5‐ASA treatments. Mean urinary excretion of 5‐ASA plus N‐Ac‐5‐ASA was comparable between treatments (dose A 21.3%, dose B 20.2%, dose C 17.9%). All treatment regimens were well tolerated; no safety issues were observed.ConclusionsPlasma and urine pharmacokinetics for Asacol TID, Asacol QD, and Lialda QD are similar, suggesting similar daily systemic exposures can be obtained with either TID or QD dosing. NCT00751699.

Frequency of Dosing of Cephalexin for Oral Step-Down Therapy of Pediatric Osteoarticular Infections Caused by Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus Aureus.

Osteoarticular infections are one of the more common invasive bacterial infections encountered in children. There exist significant practice variations in both the diagnosis and treatment of such infections. However, the practice of transitioning from parenteral therapy to oral antibiotics has been well validated by several studies. For methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), cephalexin is often recommended. Prospective, controlled data regarding optimal dosing of cephalexin in pediatric osteomyelitis are not available. We sought to review our retrospective, uncontrolled data on four times daily (QID) versus three times daily (TID) dosing of cephalexin for pediatric osteoarticular infections. Children ≥1 month to <18 years of age admitted to Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego with a diagnosis of osteomyelitis or septic arthritis between January 1, 2002, and November 30, 2007, were identified and previously reported. Only patients with culture-positive MSSA infections are included in this report. Demographic and clinical data were manually extracted from the electronic medical record. Fifty-nine patients were treated with cephalexin and had records available for review through our electronic medical record. Thirty-eight patients (64.4%) were treated QID, and 21 patients (35.6%) were treated TID. Clinical cure was achieved in all patients with only one adverse event occurring in the QID group. In this retrospective chart review of children with osteoarticular infections caused by MSSA treated with cephalexin, similar clinical outcomes were found with QID versus TID dosing.

Dosing characteristics of oral treprostinil in real-world clinical practice.

Pharmacokinetic studies with oral treprostinil demonstrate that three times daily (TID) dosing reduces peak-to-trough plasma trepostinil fluctuations compared with twice daily (BID) dosing. TID dosing may allow for faster titration, higher total daily doses, and potentially improve the tolerability of oral trepostinil. This analysis, which looks at the real-world dosing of oral treprostinil, supports the utility of TID dosing.

Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Voriconazole To Develop an Alternative Dosing Regimen in Children

The pharmacokinetic variability of voriconazole (VCZ) in immunocompromised children is high, and adequate exposure, particularly in the first days of therapy, is uncertain. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed to explore VCZ exposure in plasma after alternative dosing regimens. Concentration data were obtained from a pediatric phase II study. Nonlinear mixed effects modeling was used to develop the model. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to test an array of three-times-daily (TID) intravenous dosing regimens in children 2 to 12 years of age. A two-compartment model with first-order absorption, nonlinear Michaelis-Menten elimination, and allometric scaling best described the data (maximal kinetic velocity for nonlinear Michaelis-Menten clearance [Vmax] = 51.5 mg/h/70 kg, central volume of distribution [V1] = 228 liters/70 kg, intercompartmental clearance [Q] = 21.9 liters/h/70 kg, peripheral volume of distribution [V2] = 1,430 liters/70 kg, bioavailability [F] = 59.4%, Km = fixed value of 1.15 mg/liter, absorption rate constant = fixed value of 1.19 h-1). Interindividual variabilities for Vmax, V1, Q, and F were 63.6%, 45.4%, 67%, and 1.34% on a logit scale, respectively, and residual variability was 37.8% (proportional error) and 0.0049 mg/liter (additive error). Monte Carlo simulations of a regimen of 9 mg/kg of body weight TID simulated for 24, 48, and 72 h followed by 8 mg/kg two times daily (BID) resulted in improved early target attainment relative to that with the currently recommended BID dosing regimen but no increased rate of accumulation thereafter. Pharmacokinetic modeling suggests that intravenous TID dosing at 9 mg/kg per dose for up to 3 days may result in a substantially higher percentage of children 2 to 12 years of age with adequate exposure to VCZ early during treatment. Before implementation of this regimen in patients, however, validation of exposure, safety, and tolerability in a carefully designed clinical trial would be needed.

Phase 1 Study of CB-839, a First-in-Class, Glutaminase Inhibitor in Patients with Multiple Myeloma and Lymphoma

Phase 1 Study of CB-839, a First-in-Class, Glutaminase Inhibitor in Patients with Multiple Myeloma and Lymphoma

Abstract C49: Phase 1 study of CB-839, a first-in-class, orally administered small molecule inhibitor of glutaminase in patients with refractory solid tumors

Abstract Background: CB-839 is a first-in-class highly selective inhibitor of glutaminase (GLS), a key enzyme in the utilization of glutamine by many cancer cells. Inhibition of GLS blocks the ability of tumor cells to use glutamine as a source of energy and anabolic building blocks. CB-839 has broad activity, inducing cell death or growth arrest in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), clear cell renal cell cancer (RCC), and mesothelioma cell lines. GLS inhibition with CB-839 has also been shown to synergistically combine with several standard of care (SOC) chemotherapies and signal transduction inhibitors. Methods: CX-839-001 is an ongoing Phase 1 study of escalating doses of CB-839 given continuously in 21 day cycles in advanced and/or treatment-refractory solid tumor patients (pts) to evaluate safety and tolerability, and to identify the recommended Phase 2 dose (R2PD). It was initially given three times daily (TID) without food, but based on PK and safety data, the drug is now being given twice daily (BID) with meals. Pharmacokinetics (PK) is monitored on Days 1 and 15; pharmacodynamics is measured in platelets and in tumor biopsies. Pts are currently being enrolled at the RP2D, 600 mg BID, with the tumor types noted above as well as pts receiving CB-839 in combination with SOC agents, including paclitaxel in TNBC, docetaxel in KRAS-mutant NSCLC, erlotinib in EGFR-mutant NSCLC, and everolimus in RCC. Results: Safety data from 85 pts enrolled in the trial revealed a low rate of Gr3/4 AEs, with 9.4% (8/85) of pts experiencing a Gr3/4 AE related to CB-839. One DLT occurred on study, a drug-related Gr3 creatinine elevation in a patient with diabetic nephropathy at the 250 mg TID dose level. Reversible, asymptomatic Gr3 elevations in transaminases occurred mostly on the TID schedule in 6/32 pts (18.8%), with only one Gr3 event occurring among 53 pts (1.9%) receiving the BID regimen. Clear exposure-dependent inhibition of GLS in platelets was seen 4 hr after the first dose of CB-839, with &amp;gt;90% inhibition at PK trough for most pts at the RP2D. A total of 93 pts have been enrolled on the monotherapy cohorts of the trial as of 24 July 2015, including 32 pts on TID dosing (100-800 mg) and 61 pts on BID dosing (600-1000 mg). Radiographic stable disease (SD) was observed in 6 (19%) of 31 efficacy-evaluable pts receiving CB-839 on the TID schedule and 17 (40%) of 43 efficacy-evaluable pts on the BID schedule. Pts with SD have been on study for a median of &amp;gt;5 cycles (range 3-18); 15 (65%) of these pts remain on treatment. Seven of 11 (64%) evaluable RCC pts on the BID dose schedule showed SD, 5 of whom remain on study. A TNBC patient has maintained SD for more than one year and has had a 23% reduction in tumor burden. GLS expression was evaluated by IHC and found to be moderate to high in most patient tumor samples. Additional correlative studies will also be presented. Conclusions: CB-839 has been well tolerated when administered BID with food at and above doses that produced robust inhibition of GLS in platelets and in tumors. Evidence of prolonged SD in pts receiving single agent CB-839, together with strong preclinical data in combination with SOC agents including paclitaxel, everolimus and erlotinib, provides a clear rationale for continued evaluation of CB-839 in several tumor types, as a single agent and in combination with SOC therapies. Citation Format: Funda Meric-Bernstam, Angela DeMichele, Melinda L. Telli, Pamela Munster, Keith W. Orford, George D. Demitri, Gary K. Schwartz, Othon Iliopoulos, James W. Mier, Taofeek K. Owonikoko, Mark K. Bennett, Manish R. Patel, Jeffery R. Infante, James J. Harding. Phase 1 study of CB-839, a first-in-class, orally administered small molecule inhibitor of glutaminase in patients with refractory solid tumors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2015 Nov 5-9; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14(12 Suppl 2):Abstract nr C49.

Prediction of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Doripenem in Pediatric Patients

The aim of this paper was to predict the pharmacokinetics of doripenem in pediatrics from adult pharmacokinetic data and to investigate dosing regimens in pediatrics using Monte-Carlo pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) simulations prior to the initiation of pediatric clinical trials. The pharmacokinetics in pediatrics was predicted by using a previously reported approach for β-lactam antibiotics. Monte-Carlo simulation was employed to assess dosing regimens in pediatrics based on the predicted pharmacokinetic profiles and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions of Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae, which frequently cause infectious pediatric diseases. The probabilities of attaining target time above MIC (40%T>MIC) were calculated for dosing regimens of 1-30 mg/kg with two or three times daily dosing (TID) based on simulations of 5000 pediatric patients and MICs. The results suggested 15 and 5 mg/kg TID would give approximately 90% or more probability of target attainment against Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae, respectively. The pediatric phase 3 study confirmed that pharmacokinetics in pediatrics could be well predicted by this method, indicating that the dosing regimen had been appropriately selected. The framework of dose selection for pediatric clinical trials based on predictions of pharmacokinetic profiles and PK/PD indices should be applicable to the development of other β-lactam antibiotics for pediatric use.

Pramipexole extended-release: a review of its use in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Pramipexole, a non-ergolinic, D3-preferring dopamine agonist (DA), is well established as a treatment option for motor symptoms at all stages of Parkinson's disease (PD). It is administered orally and is available as both a three-times daily immediate-release (IR) formulation and a once-daily extended-release (ER) formulation (Mirapex(®) ER, Mirapexin(®) ER; Pexola(®) ER, Sifrol(®) ER). The two formulations are bioequivalent; the majority (>80 %) of patients can be switched overnight from pramipexole IR to ER without the need for dosage adjustment. In terms of improving activities of daily living and motor function in short-term (≤33-week), double-blind studies, pramipexole ER was noninferior to pramipexole IR and significantly more effective than placebo as monotherapy in patients with early PD, and similar to pramipexole IR and significantly more effective than placebo as adjunctive therapy to levodopa in patients with advanced PD. In long-term (80-week) extensions of these trials, open-label treatment with pramipexole ER was associated with sustained symptomatic benefit. Moreover, the majority of extension participants who responded to a simple convenience questionnaire expressed a preference for once-daily over three-times daily dosing. Pramipexole ER was generally well tolerated in clinical trials; no new or unexpected safety signals were identified compared with the IR formulation. Head-to-head trials are needed in order to fully define the role of pramipexole ER relative to other once-daily formulations of DAs (oral ropinirole and transdermal rotigotine). Nonetheless, by reducing the pill burden, the ER formulation of pramipexole provides a more convenient alternative to the IR formulation; studies specifically testing whether this translates into improved patient compliance and symptom control are worthwhile.

Once versus three times daily dosing of oral budesonide for active Crohn's disease: A double-blind, double-dummy, randomised trial

BackgroundOral budesonide 9mg/day represents first-line treatment of mild-to-moderately active ileocolonic Crohn's disease. However, there is no precise recommendation for budesonide dosing due to lack of comparative data. A once-daily (OD) 9mg dose may improve adherence and thereby efficacy. MethodsAn eight-week, double-blind, double-dummy randomised trial compared budesonide 9mg OD versus 3mg three-times daily (TID) in patients with mild-to-moderately active ileocolonic Crohn's disease. Primary endpoint was clinical remission defined as CDAI <150 at week 8 (last observation carried forward). ResultsThe final intent-to-treat population comprised 471 patients (238 [9mg OD], 233 [3mg TID]). The confirmatory population for the primary endpoint analysis was the interim per protocol population (n=377; 188 [9mg OD], 189 [3mg TID]), in which the primary endpoint was statistically non-inferior with budesonide 9mg OD versus 3mg TID. Clinical remission was achieved in 71.3% versus 75.1%, a difference of −3.9% (95% CI [−14.6%; 6.4%]; p=0.020 for non-inferiority). The mean (SD) time to remission was 21.9 (13.8) days versus 21.4 (14.6) days with budesonide 9mg OD versus 3mg TID, respectively. In a subpopulation of 122 patients with baseline SES-CD ulcer score ≥1, complete mucosal healing occurred in 32.8% (21/64) on 9mg OD and 41.4% (24/58) on 3mg TID; deep remission (mucosal healing and clinical remission) was observed in 26.6% (17/64) and 32.8% (19/58) of patients, respectively. Treatment-emergent suspected adverse drug reactions were reported in 4.6% of 9mg OD and 4.7% of 3mg TID patients. ConclusionsBudesonide at the recommended dose of 9mg/day can be administered OD without impaired efficacy and safety compared to 3mg TID dosing in mild-to-moderately active Crohn's disease.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of pregabalin treatment for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: findings from seven randomized, controlled trials across a range of doses.

OBJECTIVE—To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of pregabalin across the effective dosing range, to determine differences in the efficacy of three times daily (TID) versus twice daily (BID) dosage schedules, and to use time-to-event analysis to determine the time to onset of a sustained therapeutic effect using data from seven trials of pregabalin in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Data were pooled across seven double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials using pregabalin to treat painful DPN with dosages of 150, 300, and 600 mg/day administered TID or BID. Only one trial included all three of these dosages, and TID dosing was used in four. All studies shared fundamental selection criteria, and treatment durations ranged from 5 to 13 weeks.RESULTS—Pooled analysis showed that pregabalin significantly reduced pain and pain-related sleep interference associated with DPN (150, 300, and 600 mg/day administered TID vs. placebo, all P ≤ 0.007). Only the 600 mg/day dosage showed efficacy when administered BID (P ≤ 0.001). Pain and sleep interference reductions associated with pregabalin appear to be positively correlated with dosage; the greatest effect was observed in patients treated with 600 mg/day. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the median time to onset of a sustained (≥30% at end point) 1-point improvement was 4 days in patients treated with pregabalin at 600 mg/day, 5 days in patients treated with pregabalin at 300 mg/day, 13 days in patients treated with pregabalin at 150 mg/day, and 60 days in patients receiving placebo. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were dizziness, somnolence, and peripheral edema.CONCLUSIONS—Treatment with pregabalin across its effective dosing range is associated with significant, dose-related improvement in pain in patients with DPN.

Biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 three times a day in older patients with type 2 diabetes not achieving optimal glycemic control on a twice-daily regimen: A retrospective case series analysis from clinical practice

This retrospective study was conducted to determine whether the addition of a third injection of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 (BIAsp 30) just before lunch in older patients with type 2 diabetes who did not achieve goals with a twice-daily (BID) regimen would optimize glycemic control in a clinical practice setting. A retrospective chart analysis was conducted. In 12 patients aged 52 to 80 y with type 2 diabetes that had been diagnosed between 5 and 24 y earlier and who remained on oral antidiabetes agents, a third injection of BIAsp 30 was added because optimal glycemic control (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c]<7%) was not achieved on a BID regimen. Changes in HbA1c, body weight, total insulin dose, and frequency of hypoglycemia were analyzed after 6 mo of three times daily (TID) treatment. Mean HbA1c decreased from 8.4% to 7.2%. An HbA1c goal of <7% was attained by 58% of patients. Although the total insulin dose increased by 11% with the TID regimen, pre-breakfast and predinner doses decreased by 15%. No patient experienced major hypoglycemia on BID or TID dosing. With the TID regimen, no minor hypoglycemic events were reported by patients and mean body weight decreased by 2.25 lb. The addition of a third injection of BIAsp 30 substantially improved HbA1c and decreased body weight and the incidence of hypoglycemia in 12 patients with type 2 diabetes who did not achieve optimal glycemic control on a BID regimen.

Twice vs Three Times Daily Heparin Dosing for Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in the General Medical Population: A Metaanalysis

Objectives:Prophylaxis with unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been proven to reduce rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hospitalized medical patients. While twice-daily (BID) and three-times-daily (TID) dosing regimens have been studied, the two have never been directly compared. We performed a metaanalysis to assess whether TID is superior to BID dosing in the prevention of VTE.Methods:Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register from 1966 through December 2004 were searched for randomized trials comparing subcutaneously dosed UHF (either BID or TID) with placebo or control for VTE prophylaxis in medical patient populations. Two reviewers independently rated study quality on the basis of predetermined criteria. Data were extracted on patient age, hospital setting, comorbidities, VTE rates, and bleeding complications.Results:Twelve studies were identified; 7,978 patients (1,664 patients in the TID arm, and 6,314 patients in the BID arm) were included. After adjustment for baseline risk, there was no difference in the overall rate (per 1,000 patient-days) of VTE (BID, 5.4; vs TID, 3.5; p = 0.87). TID heparin showed a trend toward a decrease in pulmonary embolism (PE) [BID, 1.5; vs TID, 0.5; p = 0.09] and in proximal DVT and PE (BID, 2.3; vs TID, 0.9; p = 0.05). The risk for major bleeding was significantly increased with TID heparin (BID, 0.35; vs TID, 0.96; p < 0.001).Conclusions:BID heparin dosing causes fewer major bleeding episodes, while TID dosing appears to offer somewhat better efficacy in preventing clinically relevant VTE events. Practitioners should use underlying risk for VTE and bleeding to individualize pharmacologic prevention.

Studies of compliance with delayed-release mesalazine therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Non-compliance with maintenance mesalazine therapy may be a risk factor for relapse in inflammatory bowel disease, but the prevalence and determinants of non-compliance are unknown. To study the prevalence and determinants of non-compliance in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Out-patients receiving delayed-release mesalazine were studied. Compliance was determined by direct enquiry and by analysis of urine samples for 5-aminosalicylic acid/N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid. Potential determinants of compliance were assessed. Ninety-eight patients were studied. Forty-two patients (43%) reported taking <80% of their prescribed dose. Logistic regression revealed the independent predictors of non-compliance to be three-times daily dosing [odds ratio (OR), 3.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.8-8.4] and full-time employment (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1-6.9). Urine from 12 patients (12%) contained no detectable 5-aminosalicylic acid/N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid, and 18 patients (18%) had levels below those expected. Depression was the only independent predictor of complete non-compliance (OR, 10.5; 95% CI, 1.8-79.0), and three-times daily dosing was the only independent predictor of partial non-compliance (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.8-8.9). Self-reporting correctly identified 66% of patients judged to be non-compliant on urinary drug measurement. Non-compliance with maintenance mesalazine therapy is common in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Three-times daily dosing and full-time employment are predictors of partial non-compliance, whilst depression is associated with complete non-compliance. Self-reporting detects most non-compliant patients.

P.1.130 Carbamazepine versus lithium in the prophylaxis of bipolar affective disorders. A randomised, double-blind 1-year study in 168 patients

Oral budesonide 9 mg/day represents first-line treatment of mild-to-moderately active ileocolonic Crohn's disease. However, there is no precise recommendation for budesonide dosing due to lack of comparative data. A once-daily (OD) 9 mg dose may improve adherence and thereby efficacy.An eight-week, double-blind, double-dummy randomised trial compared budesonide 9 mg OD versus 3 mg three-times daily (TID) in patients with mild-to-moderately active ileocolonic Crohn's disease. Primary endpoint was clinical remission defined as CDAI < 150 at week 8 (last observation carried forward).The final intent-to-treat population comprised 471 patients (238 [9 mg OD], 233 [3 mg TID]). The confirmatory population for the primary endpoint analysis was the interim per protocol population (n = 377; 188 [9 mg OD], 189 [3 mg TID]), in which the primary endpoint was statistically non-inferior with budesonide 9 mg OD versus 3 mg TID. Clinical remission was achieved in 71.3% versus 75.1%, a difference of − 3.9% (95% CI [− 14.6%; 6.4%]; p = 0.020 for non-inferiority). The mean (SD) time to remission was 21.9 (13.8) days versus 21.4 (14.6) days with budesonide 9 mg OD versus 3 mg TID, respectively. In a subpopulation of 122 patients with baseline SES-CD ulcer score ≥ 1, complete mucosal healing occurred in 32.8% (21/64) on 9 mg OD and 41.4% (24/58) on 3 mg TID; deep remission (mucosal healing and clinical remission) was observed in 26.6% (17/64) and 32.8% (19/58) of patients, respectively. Treatment-emergent suspected adverse drug reactions were reported in 4.6% of 9 mg OD and 4.7% of 3 mg TID patients.Budesonide at the recommended dose of 9 mg/day can be administered OD without impaired efficacy and safety compared to 3 mg TID dosing in mild-to-moderately active Crohn's disease.