Three-dimensional Anal Endosonography Research Articles

Description of a new ultrasound sign to distinguish Crohn's anal fistula from cryptoglandular fistula: The rosary sign.

Endoanal and endorectal ultrasound are essential diagnostic tools for perianal fistula. Recent studies have examined ultrasound signs that help differentiate cryptoglandular anal fistula from perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease. The main aim of this work was to describe a new ultrasound sign for perianal fistula and to evaluate its ability to differentiate Crohn's disease from cryptoglandular anal fistula. This study included 363 patients (113 women; mean age 46.5 ± 14.3 years). Overall, 287 (79.1%) patients had a cryptoglandular perianal fistula and 76 (20.9%) had fistulizing Crohn's disease. All patients underwent three-dimensional anal endosonography for perianal fistula. The reading was carried out by two observers. Observer 1, who was an experienced sonographer and colorectal surgeon, observed the ultrasound sign in 120 patients (33.1%), while observer 2, who was inexperienced, observed it in 129 patients (35.5%). The overall interobserver agreement was 67.22%. The Kappa coefficient measuring interobserver agreement was 0.273 (0.17-0.38). Among those patients with Crohn's disease, 48.68% had the sign and 16% did not (p = 0.001). A logistic regression study showed that the sign was a predictor of Crohn's disease (p = 0.001), with an odds ratio of 2.33 (1.39-3.91). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were 38.68%, 71.08%, 30.83%, 83.95% and 66.39%, respectively. This study provides a new ultrasound sign for perianal fistula (the rosary sign) in patients with Crohn's disease. The sign can be used to differentiate Crohn's disease from other types of fistula. This is useful in the management of patients with anal fistula.

Synchronized functional anal sphincter assessment: maximizing the potential of anal vector manometry and 3-D anal endosonography.

Understanding the association between structure and function is vital before considering surgery involving anal sphincter division. By correlating three-dimensional anal endosonography (AES) and three-dimensional anal canal vector volume manometry (VVM), this study details a method to produce measurements of both sphincter length and pressure leading to identification of the functionally important areas of the anal canal. The aim of this study was to provide combined detailed information on anal canal anatomy and physiology. Twelve males and 12 nulliparous females with no bowel symptoms underwent VVM (using a water-perfused, eight-channel radially arranged catheter) and AES. The synchronization of AES and VVM identified that the majority of rest and squeeze anal pressure is present in the portion of the anal canal covered by both anal sphincters. Nearly, 20% of overall resting anal pressure is produced distal to the caudal termination of the internal anal sphincter. Puborectalis accounts for a significantly greater percentage volume of pressure in females both at rest and when squeezing, though the total volume of pressure is not significantly greater. The majority of resting and squeezing pressure and the least asymmetry, in both sexes, is in the portion of the anal canal covered by external anal sphincter. In females, the external anal sphincter is shorter and a proportionately longer puborectalis accounts for a greater percentage of pressure. Sphincter targeted fistula surgery in females must be performed with special caution. A protective role for puborectalis following obstetric anal sphincter injury is suggested.

Three-dimensional anal endosonography in depicting anal-canal anatomy

This report describes the advantages of 3D anal endosonography in depicting the normal anatomy of the anal canal in relation to sex and age. A retrospective study was performed of 85 patients, 33 men and 52 women, previously examined with 3D anal ultrasound (US) for clinically suspected anorectal disease but found to be negative. The examinations were performed with a Bruel and Kjaer US system with a 2050 transducer, scanning from the anorectal junction to the subcutaneous portion of the external anal sphincter (EAS). The 3D reconstructions provided an estimation of sphincter length in the anterior and posterior planes, and axial 2D images enabled calculation of the thickness of the internal anal sphincter (IAS) and EAS in the anterior, posterior and lateral transverse planes. Distribution of the sphincter complex is asymmetric in both sexes: the EAS and IAS are significantly shorter in females, especially in the anterior longitudinal plane (p=0.005 and p<0.001, respectively). EAS and IAS thickness increases with age, especially the lateral IAS (R(2)=0.37, p<0.001) and the posterior EAS (R(2)=0.29, p=0.01). A good knowledge of anal-canal anatomy is essential to detect sphincter abnormalities when assessing pelvic floor dysfunction.

Evaluation by three-dimensional anal endosonography of injectable silicone biomaterial (PTQ™) implants to treat fecal incontinence: long-term localization and relation with the deterioration of the continence

The purposes of the study were the long-term evaluation of silicone implants with three-dimensional (3D) anal endosonography and its correlation with anal incontinence. Fifteen patients were injected with silicone because of anal incontinence and co-existing internal anal sphincter disruption (n = 8) or thinning (n = 7). The evaluation was performed with the Wexner score and 3D anal endosonographies. Forty-four implants were performed. The endosonography at 3 months detected that all the implants were properly located. At 24 months, it detected 37/44 implants of initially injected and 33/37 were properly located. Four of 37 implants had moved and 7/44 were neither in the anus nor in the rectum. A total of 8/15 patients had their implants correctly placed. Globally, silicone implants significantly improved fecal continence. The silicone implants might have moved or even be lost. The continence deterioration suffered by most patients after the first year of the injection has no relation with the localization and number of implants that the patients have.

Interobserver and Intraobserver Variation of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Anal Endosonography in the Evaluation of Recurrent Anal Cancer

This study was designed to evaluate the interobserver and intraobserver agreement of two-dimensional (2-D) and three-dimensional (3-D) anal endosonography for the detection of local recurrence anal carcinoma. Thirty-six patients were treated for anal carcinoma, and seven had recurrent disease. They were investigated by using 3-D endosonography at Rigshospitalet from July 2001 to January 2005 because of suspected local recurrence. The 3-D endosonographic examinations were reviewed from the hard disc by two observers who twice reviewed all 2-D examinations (the axial projection) as well as all 3-D examinations (the axial, as well as the reconstructed coronal and sagittal projections). The observers scored each examination according to the following scale regarding presence of local recurrence: 1 = no finding/benign findings; 2 = properly benign findings; 3 = suspicious findings/malignant findings. Kappa statistic-statistic was used to evaluate interobserver and intraobserver variation. Three-dimensional endosonography achieved better interobserver agreement than 2-D endosonography: kappa 3-D 0.34-047 vs. kappa 2-D 0.15-0.28 and better intraobserver agreement: kappa 3-D 0.34-0.62 vs. kappa 2-D 0.22-0.28. These differences showed P < 0.05. Three-dimensional endosonography proved to have significantly better interobserver and intraobserver agreement than 2-D endosonography concerning detection of recurrent anal cancer. Three-dimensional endosonography seems to be less dependent of the individual examiner than 2-D endosonography.

Elastic band ligation of hemorrhoids: Flexible gastroscope or rigid proctoscope?

To compare rigid proctoscope and flexible endoscope for elastic band ligation of internal hemorrhoids. Patients between 18 and 80 years old, with chronic complaints (blood loss, pain, itching or prolapse) of internal hemorrhoids of grade 1-3, were randomized to elastic band ligation by rigid proctoscope or flexible endoscope (preloaded with 7 bands). Patients were re-treated every 6 wk until the cessation of complaints. Evaluation by three-dimensional anal endosonography was performed. Forty-one patients were included (median age 52.0, range 27-79 years, 20 men). Nineteen patients were treated with a rigid proctoscope and twenty two with a flexible endoscope. Twenty-nine patients had grade 1 hemorrhoids, 9 patients had grade 2 hemorrhoids and 3 patients had grade 3 hemorrhoids. All patients needed a minimum of 1 treatment and a maximum of 3 treatments. A median of 4.0 bands was used in the rigid proctoscope group and a median of 6.0 bands was used in the flexible endoscope group (P < 0.05). Pain after ligation tended to be more frequent in patients treated with the flexible endoscope (first treatment: 3 vs 10 patients, P < 0.05). Three-dimensional endosonography showed no sphincter defects or alterations in submucosal thickness. Both techniques are easy to perform, well tolerated and have a good and fast effect. It is easier to perform more ligations with the flexible endoscope. Additional advantages of the flexible scope are the maneuverability and photographic documentation. However, treatment with the flexible endoscope might be more painful and is more expensive.

Rectovaginal fistula after STARR procedure complicated by haematoma of the posterior vaginal wall: report of a case

We report the case of a patient treated with the stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedure for obstructed defecation, who developed an early postoperative haematoma of the posterior vaginal wall and, after 30 days, a rectovaginal fistula (RVF), even though the intervention had been performed according to the standardized technique. After clinical examination and three-dimensional anal endosonography, we carried out a successful surgical correction with double vaginal and rectal flaps with repair of the rectovaginal septum and without faecal diversion. The STARR procedure, even if performed according to a rigorous application of the methodological standards, may be followed by a RVF possibly due to a blood collection leading to ischaemia of the vaginal wall.

Three-Dimensional Anal Endosonography May Improve Detection of Recurrent Anal Cancer

In our center since 2001, follow-up examination has included three-dimensional endosonography in all patients with suspicion of local recurrence of anal cancer. This study was designed to investigate whether three-dimensional endosonography surpassed two-dimensional endosonography as a diagnostic tool for patients with suspected local recurrence. This prospective study included 38 consecutive patients who have had anal carcinoma and were investigated using three-dimensional endosonography in combination with anoscopy and digital rectal examination at Rigshospitalet from July 2001 to January 2005 under suspicion of local recurrence. All endosonographic examinations-two-dimensional, three-dimensional, and three-dimensional in combination with anoscopy and digital rectal examination-were evaluated by blinded observers. The observers scored each examination according to a five-point scale in which a score from 1 to 3 was regarded as benign endosonographic findings and a score from 4 to 5 was regarded as malignant endosonographic findings. The endosonographic diagnosis for each examination was compared with histologic evaluation or when no biopsy had been taken with a follow-up period of at least six months. If a patient showed no signs of local recurrence in the follow-up period, no local recurrence was considered to be present at the time of the investigation. The sensitivity was 1.0 for three-dimensional endosonography in combination with palpation, 0.86 for three-dimensional endosonography alone, and 0.57 for two-dimensional endosonography. The differences between two-dimensional endosonography and three-dimensional endosonography alone as well as two-dimensional endosonography and three-dimensional endosonography + anoscopy and digital rectal examination both reached significance with P values <0.05. This study indicates that three-dimensional endosonography surpasses two-dimensional endosonography in the evaluation of patients with suspicion of local recurrence of anal cancer especially in combination with anoscopy and digital rectal examination.

Atrophy and Defects Detection of the External Anal Sphincter: Comparison Between Three-Dimensional Anal Endosonography and Endoanal Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Using endoanal magnetic resonance imaging, atrophy of the external anal sphincter can be established. This aspect has not been thoroughly investigated using three-dimensional anal endosonography. The purpose of this study was to compare prospectively three-dimensional anal endosonography to magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of atrophy and defects of the external anal sphincter in patients with fecal incontinence. In addition, we compared both techniques for anal sphincter thickness and length measurements. Patients with fecal incontinence underwent three-dimensional anal endosonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Images of both endoluminal techniques were evaluated for atrophy and defects of the external anal sphincter. External anal sphincter atrophy scoring with three-dimensional anal endosonography depended on the distinction of the external anal sphincter and its reflectivity. External anal sphincter atrophy scoring with magnetic resonance imaging depended on the amount of muscle and the presence of fat replacement. Atrophy score was defined as none, moderate, and severe. A defect was defined at anal endosonography by a hypoechogenic zone and at magnetic resonance imaging as a discontinuity of the sphincteric ring and/or scar tissue. Differences between three-dimensional anal endosonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of external anal sphincter atrophy and defects were calculated. In addition, we compared external anal sphincter thickness and length measurements in three-dimensional anal endosonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Eighteen patients were included (median age, 58 years; range, 27-80; 15 women). Three-dimensional anal endosonography and magnetic resonance imaging did not significantly differ for the detection of external anal sphincter atrophy (P = 0.25) and defects (P = 0.38). Three-dimensional anal endosonography demonstrated atrophy in 16 patients, magnetic resonance imaging detected atrophy in 13 patients. Three-dimensional anal endosonography agreed with magnetic resonance imaging in 15 of 18 patients for the detection of external anal sphincter atrophy. Using the grading system, 8 of the 18 patients scored the same grade. Three-dimensional anal endosonography detected seven external anal sphincter defects and magnetic resonance imaging detected ten. Three-dimensional anal endosonography and magnetic resonance imaging agreed on the detection of external anal sphincter defects in 13 of 18 patients. Comparison between three-dimensional anal endosonography and magnetic resonance imaging for sphincter thickness and length measurements showed no statistically significant concordance and had no correlation with external anal sphincter atrophy. This is the first study that shows that three-dimensional anal endosonography can be used for detecting external anal sphincter atrophy. Both endoanal techniques are comparable in detecting atrophy and defects of the external anal sphincter, although there is a substantial difference in grading of external anal sphincter atrophy. Correlation between three-dimensional anal endosonography and magnetic resonance imaging for thickness and length measurements is poor. Inconsistency between the two methods needs to be evaluated further.

Three-dimensional anal endosonography may improve diagnostic confidence of detecting damage to the anal sphincter complex

The aim of study was to investigate the differences between three-dimensional (3D) endosonography and two-dimensional (2D) endosonography in visualizing damage to the anal sphincter complex. 33 patients with a history of damage to the anal sphincters were examined with a 10 MHz rotating endoprobe. Cross-sectional images of the anal sphincters were stored on a 3D system during retraction of the endoprobe through the anal canal. Cross-sectional images (2D) were compared with reconstructed projections (3D) according to five parameters relating to damage of different parts of the sphincter muscles as well as scar-tissue formation in the rectovaginal septum. Depending on whether the investigator felt confident in diagnosis of scar tissue being present or not a numerical value of 1 or 0 was assigned. In this way a scale from 0 to 5 points was achieved, which ideally should be identical in 3D and 2D. Overall both observers felt diagnostic confidence in a median of five parameters (range 4-5) using 3D, compared with a median of four parameters (range 3-5) using 2D (p=0.001). When only assessing the four parameters relating to damage of different parts of the sphincter-muscles the observers felt diagnostic confidence in eight more cases using 3D than 2D. This difference did not reach statistical significance. The overall agreement between the two observers comparing all five parameters was 98.2% using 3D and 87.9% using 2D. 3D anal endosonography improves diagnostic confidence in detecting damage to the anal sphincter complex. The agreement between the two observers was acceptable using 2D but better when using 3D. The 3D method may improve the selection of patients for surgical repair of the anal sphincter complex.

Alteration of anal sphincter morphology following vaginal delivery revealed by multiplanar anal endosonography.

To assess morphologic change in the anal sphincters in the absence of endosonographic evidence of trauma after vaginal delivery. Prospective observational study. District general hospital. Consecutively booked nulliparous pregnant women attending antenatal clinic. All women were examined using three-dimensional anal endosonography, simple manometry and had questionnaire assessment of incontinence before and after delivery. Components of the anal canal were measured in the axial, sagittal and coronal planes and paired pre- and post-delivery examinations were compared. Any changes were related to changes in continence and anal canal manometry. Twenty-two women had a vaginal delivery and no endosonographic evidence of perineal trauma after delivery. After delivery, there was significant shortening of the length of the anterior external anal sphincter [EAS] (mean 21.7 vs 20.5 mm, P = 0.02) when measured in the sagittal plane, which increased in anterior angulation with respect to the axis of the anal canal (10 degrees vs 13.8 degrees, P = 0.03). In the axial plane, no change was seen in the thickness of any of the sphincter components after delivery. None of these morphologic changes correlated with changes in manometry or continence score. Anal sphincter morphology changes after an otherwise atraumatic vaginal delivery. This change does not correlate with any functional symptoms.

Alteration of anal sphincter morphology following vaginal delivery revealed by multiplanar anal endosonography

Objective To assess morphologic change in the anal sphincters in the absence of endosonographic evidence of trauma after vaginal delivery. Design Prospective observational study. Setting District general hospital. Population Consecutively booked nulliparous pregnant women attending antenatal clinic. Methods All women were examined using three-dimensional anal endosonography, simple manometry and had questionnaire assessment of incontinence before and after delivery. Main outcome measures Components of the anal canal were measured in the axial, sagittal and coronal planes and paired pre- and post-delivery examinations were compared. Any changes were related to changes in continence and anal canal manometry. Results Twenty-two women had a vaginal delivery and no endosonographic evidence of perineal trauma after delivery. After delivery, there was significant shortening of the length of the anterior external anal sphincter [EAS] (mean 21.7 vs 20.5 mm, P = 0.02) when measured in the sagittal plane, which increased in anterior angulation with respect to the axis of the anal canal (10° vs 13.8°, P = 0.03). In the axial plane, no change was seen in the thickness of any of the sphincter components after delivery. None of these morphologic changes correlated with changes in manometry or continence score. Conclusions Anal sphincter morphology changes after an otherwise atraumatic vaginal delivery. This change does not correlate with any functional symptoms.

Assessment of third degree tears using three-dimensional anal endosonography with combined anal manometry: a novel technique.

Three-dimensional anal endosonography has enabled sagittal and coronal reconstructions of the anal canal to be matched with longitudinal pressure data, to present a combined picture of structure and function. This novel technique has been applied to a group of women with a clinical diagnosis of a third degree tear. Endosonography showed that only 68% of women had ultrasound evidence of sphincter damage. Anal canal anatomy and pressure profile did not differ significantly between those with and those without sphincter damage, but the anterior external anal sphincter and the puborectalis tended to be shorter and the pressures were lower in those with sphincter disruption.

Assessment of third degree tears using three-dimensional anal endosonography with combined anal manometry: a novel technique

Three-dimensional anal endosonography has enabled sagittal and coronal reconstructions of the anal canal to be matched with longitudinal pressure data, to present a combined picture of structure and function. This novel technique has been applied to a group of women with a clinical diagnosis of a third degree tear. Endosonography showed that only 68% of women had ultrasound evidence of sphincter damage. Anal canal anatomy and pressure profile did not differ significantly between those with and those without sphincter damage, but the anterior external anal sphincter and the puborectalis tended to be shorter and the pressures were lower in those with sphincter disruption.

Multiplanar anal endosonography--normal anal canal anatomy.

Volume acquisition during anal ultrasound enables multiplanar imaging of the anal canal. The normal ultrasonic multiplanar appearance of the anal canal is described and gender differences in canal anatomy are highlighted. Ten male and 12 female normal volunteers (mean ages 31.5 years (s.d. 5.9) and 31.2 (s.d. 6.7)) had three-dimensional anal endosonography (3-D AES). Each volume dataset was seeded in the axial plane facilitating multiplanar identification of known anatomical structures. The anterior external anal sphincter (EAS) was significantly longer in men than women 30.1 mm (3.9) vs 16.9 mm (7.4) (P < 0.001). There was no difference in the length of the puborectalis 24.7 mm (6.4) vs 24 mm (5) (P=0.78) in men compared with women. The cranial extent of the anterior EAS was tilted forward in both sexes. The angle formed by the anterior EAS and the longitudinal axis of the anal canal was more acute in men than in women (11.1 degrees vs 18.6 degrees; P=0.007). Dataset volume seeding of familiar structures in the axial plane allowed the multiplanar endosonographic anatomy to be described. Multiplanar AES has enabled detailed longitudinal measurement of the components of the anal canal and has revealed important gender differences. The multiplanar ultrasonic appearance of the normal anal canal has been described for the first time.

Anal sphincter damage after vaginal delivery using three-dimensional endosonography

Objective: To determine the incidence and functional consequences of external sphincter trauma compared with other perineal structures using a novel imaging technique, three-dimensional endosonography. Methods: Fifty-five nulliparous women (mean age 30 years, range 18–47 years) had three-dimensional anal endosonography, anal manometry, and questionnaire assessment of continence at a median gestation of 33 weeks (23–42 weeks) and 10 weeks (7–22 weeks) after delivery. Results: There was ultrasound evidence of postpartum trauma in 13 of 45 women who had a vaginal delivery (29%, confidence interval [CI] 16%, 44%), involving the external sphincter in five (11%, CI 4%, 24%), the puboanalis in nine (20%, CI 10%, 35%), and the transverse perineii in three (7%, CI 1%, 18%). In four, more than one structure was damaged. External sphincter trauma was associated with a significant decrease in squeeze pressure ( P = .035) and an increase in incontinence score ( P = .02) compared with those without trauma. Tears to the puboanalis or transverse perineii only did not affect pressure or incontinence scores. Coronal imaging of the external anal sphincter was a useful adjunct to the assessment of trauma. Conclusion: The overall incidence of trauma to the sphincter complex was similar to that of previous reports, although actual damage to the external sphincter was less common and represented the only functionally significant component.

Gender differences in the longitudinal pressure profile of the anal canal related to anatomical structure as demonstrated on three-dimensional anal endosonography.

Anal canal squeeze pressure is assumed to be due to external sphincter contraction, but the contribution of other muscles has not been explored. Ten male and ten nulliparous female asymptomatic subjects had three-dimensional anal endosonography and manometry. Incremental squeeze pressures at 0. 5-cm intervals, expressed as a percentage of the maximum pressure recorded anywhere in the canal, were related to the following anatomical levels: puborectalis, overlap between external anal sphincter (EAS) and puborectalis, external and internal anal sphincters, and external anal sphincter only. Levels were determined by coronal and sagittal endosonographic reconstructions. Puborectalis was the same length in men and women (median 23.9 versus 27.1 mm) but represented a greater proportion of the anal canal in women (45 versus 61 per cent; P = 0.02). At the level of puborectalis alone, the pressure generated as a proportion of maximum anal canal pressure was 71 (range 32-100) per cent in men and 62 (range 32-100) per cent in women. At the level of the EAS alone, the pressure was 60 (4-98) per cent in men and 82 (41-100) per cent in women; where the external sphincter was overlapped by puborectalis, the pressure was 98 (60-100) per cent in men and 75 (47-100) per cent in women. Maximal anal canal squeeze pressure is found where the puborectalis overlaps the EAS. This segment represents a significant proportion of anal canal length in women.