Thoracoscopic Surgery Lung Research Articles

Risk factors and outcomes of intraoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing thoracoscopic anatomic lung surgery.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common after thoracoscopic anatomic lung surgery and can be associated with increased adverse outcomes. However, the incidence, risk factors, and related outcomes of intraoperative AF in thoracoscopic anatomical lung surgery are unknown. We retrospectively analyzed the files of 14,986 patients who had presented to the Shanghai Chest Hospital for thoracoscopic anatomic lung operations between January 2016 and December 2018. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for intraoperative AF, and a 1:1 propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was performed to compare postoperative outcomes. The incidence of intraoperative AF was 1.2% (177/14,986). Multivariate analysis identified age older than or equal to 60 years [odds ratio (OR) =1.872, P<0.001], male sex (OR =2.979, P<0.001), diabetes mellitus (OR =2.287, P=0.014), lesion diameter of 1.4 cm or larger (OR =1.855, P=0.002), clinical nodal involvement (OR =1.920, P=0.005), lobectomy resection (OR =2.958, P=0.001), and right resection (OR =1.475, P=0.021) as independent risk factors for intraoperative AF. After 1:1 PSM, we evaluated outcomes in 350 (175 pairs) patients with or without intraoperative AF. Patients who had intraoperative AF were associated with prolonged median ICU stay {28 [26-54] vs. 24 [22-44] hours, P=0.001} and length of stay (LOS) {6 [4-7] vs. 5 [4-6] days, P=0.009}. However, the differences in cardiovascular, pulmonary, and other complications were not significant. In the subgroup analysis, patients who recovered sinus rhythm during operation (n=16) had a shorter median LOS {4 [4-6] vs. 6 [4-7] days, P=0.031}, and a similar incidence of complications compared with patients who recovered sinus rhythm after surgery (n=159). We identified 7 independent risk factors for intraoperative AF, which were associated with prolonged ICU and hospital stays. The findings may help clinicians identify high-risk patients and take preventive measures to minimize the incidence and adverse outcomes of intraoperative AF.

Estimating the risk of conversion from video-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery to thoracotomy-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BackgroundUnderstanding the risk of conversion from video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) to thoracotomy is important when considering patient selection and preoperative surgical risk assessment. This review aims to estimate the rate of intraoperative conversions to thoracotomy, predictive factors, and associated outcomes for VATS anatomic lung resections.MethodsPubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched systematically in May of 2020. Observational studies examining conversions of VATS anatomic resections to thoracotomy were included. Conversion rates, causes, risk factors, and post-operative outcomes were reviewed and analyzed in aggregate.ResultsTwenty retrospective studies were reviewed, with a total of 72,932 patients undergoing VATS anatomic lung resection. The median conversion rate was 9.6% (95% CI: 6.6–13.9%). Nine studies reported a total of 114 emergency conversions, with a median incidence rate of 1.3% (95% CI: 0.6–2.8%). The most common reasons for thoracotomy were vascular injury/bleeding, difficulty lymph node dissection, and adhesions, accounting for 27.9%, 26.2% and 19% of conversions, respectively. Risk factors for conversion varied, but frequently included nodal disease, large tumors, and induction therapy. The risk of complications (OR 2.06; 95% CI: 1.77–2.40) and mortality (OR 4.11; 95% CI: 1.59–10.61) were significantly increased following conversions. There was also a significant increase in chest tube duration and length of stay following conversion.ConclusionsThe risk of conversion to thoracotomy may be as high as one in ten patients undergoing VATS anatomic lung resections, but may vary significantly based on patient selection. Although emergent conversions are rare, the need for thoracotomy may significantly increase postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Contralateral spontaneous rupture of the esophagus following severe emesis after non-intubated pulmonary wedge resection

BackgroundNon-intubated thoracoscopic lung surgery has been reported to be technically feasible and safe. Spontaneous rupture of the esophagus, also known as Boerhaave’s syndrome (BS), is rare after chest surgery.Case presentationA 60-year-old female non-smoker underwent non-intubated uniportal thoracoscopic wedge resection for a pulmonary nodule. Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block was utilized for postoperative analgesia. However, the patient suffered from severe emesis, chest pain and dyspnea 6 h after the surgery. Emergency chest x-ray revealed right-sided hydropneumothorax. BS was diagnosed by chest tube drainage and computed tomography. Besides antibiotics and tube feeding, a naso-leakage drainage tube was inserted into the right thorax for pleural evacuation. Finally, the esophagus was healed 40d after the conservative treatment.ConclusionsPerioperative antiemetic therapy is an indispensable item of fast-track surgery. Moreover, BS should be kept in mind when the patients complain of chest distress following emesis after thoracic surgery.

Perioperative Outcomes of Thoracoscopic Reoperations for Clinical Recurrence of Pulmonary Malignancy

The utility of thoracoscopic lung surgery is well established, however, reoperation for pulmonary resections has not been thoroughly studied. We sought to evaluate patient perioperative outcomes following redo thoracoscopic pulmonary resections for malignancy by comparing first and second ipsilateral operations. We included patients undergoing redo thoracoscopic pulmonary resections for clinically recurrent disease following prior lung resection for malignancy from January 1, 2011 to May 31, 2019. Nonmalignant indications were excluded. We analyzed type of procedure, diagnosis, rate of conversion to open, estimated blood loss, operating time, margin status, length of stay and complications. Forty-one patients met our inclusion criteria. The median age was 68 years (range 13-84) and 20 were women. Redo operations had longer lengths of stay with a trend toward higher rate of conversion to thoracotomy, but other perioperative outcomes were similar. No difference in outcomes was seen when patients were grouped by indication for reoperation (recurrence, multiple primaries, and metastasis) or approach of first operation (VATS vs open). However, patients undergoing an anatomic resection after a prior anatomic resection had more complications, higher blood loss, higher rate of conversions to thoracotomy, significantly longer length of stay and longer operative times than nonanatomic resections. Thoracoscopic reoperation for recurrent, metachronous, or metastatic cancer to the lung is a reasonable approach. However, the surgeon must recognize and counsel patients that in patients undergoing a redo anatomic resection, thoracoscopic reoperations are more difficult with more adverse outcomes.

Application of Improved POSSUM Score Combined with Clavien-Dindo Classification in Predicting the Incidence of Severe Complications After Thoracoscopic Lung Surgery

Application of Improved POSSUM Score Combined with Clavien-Dindo Classification in Predicting the Incidence of Severe Complications After Thoracoscopic Lung Surgery

Risk Factors for Emergence Agitation in Adults Undergoing Thoracoscopic Lung Surgery: A Case-Control Study of 1,950 Patients

The present study investigated the incidence of and risk factors for emergence agitation (EA) in adult patients after thoracoscopic lung surgery. A retrospective case-control study. Single-center university hospital. The study comprised 1,950 adult patients who underwent elective lung surgery from January to December 2016. None. Preoperative, surgical, and anesthesia-related data were collected. EA was assessed with the Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale and defined as a Riker score ≥5. Univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to identify risk factors for EA. The incidence of EA was 14.1%. The results of the multivariate analysis showed that male sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.877, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.341-2.627), age ≥65 years (OR 1.424, 95% CI 1.074-1.889), body mass index ≥24 kg/m2 (OR 1.409, 95% CI 1.070-1.856), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅲ or Ⅳ (OR 2.654, 95% CI 1.189-5.924), cigarette smoking (OR 1.553, 95% CI 1.108-2.177), duration of surgery (OR 1.006, 95% CI 1.003-1.009), intraoperative tachycardia (OR 1.721, 95% CI 1.058-2.802), intraoperative hypotension (OR 1.636, 95% CI 1.064-2.514), intraoperative hypertension (OR 1.608; 95% CI 1.056-2.448), and rescue analgesia (OR 1.810, 95% CI 1.235-2.653) were independent risk factors for EA. However, wound infiltration (OR 0.679, 95% CI 0.507-0.908) and the use of dexmedetomidine (OR 0.663, 95% CI 0.490-0.869) appeared to be protective factors against EA. EA is a common complication after thoracoscopic lung surgery, especially within a certain population. Adequate perioperative management, which comprises wound infiltration, the maintenance of intraoperative hemodynamic stability, sufficient analgesia, and the use of dexmedetomidine, should be adopted to reduce the incidence of EA.

Response to comment on: ‘Hybrid operating room: the leading edge of thoracic surgery’

We sincerely appreciate the interest and comments for our article entitled “Preoperative Dye Localization for Thoracoscopic Lung Surgery: Hybrid Versus Computed Tomography Room” (1). The authors have comprehensively analyzed and discussed several of the important issues described in our manuscript.

Interactive 3D Reconstruction of Pulmonary Anatomy for Preoperative Planning, Virtual Simulation, and Intraoperative Guiding in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lung Surgery.

Routine imaging modalities combined with state-of-the-art reconstruction software can substantially improve preoperative planning and simplify complex procedure by enhancing the surgeon's knowledge of the patient's specific anatomy. The aim of the current study was to demonstrate the feasibility of interactive three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) reconstructions for preoperative planning and intraoperative guiding in video-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery (VATS) with 3D vision. Twenty-five consecutive patients referred for an anatomic pulmonary resection by a single surgeon were included. Data were collected prospectively. All patients underwent a CT angiography in the diagnostic pathway prior to referral. 3D reconstruction of the pulmonary anatomy was obtained from CT scans with dedicated software. An interactive PDF file of the 3D reconstruction with virtual resection was created, in which all the pulmonary structures could be individually selected. Furthermore, the reconstructions were used for intraoperative guiding on double monitor during VATS with 3D vision. In total, 26 procedures were performed for 5 benign and 21 malignant conditions. Lobectomy and segmentectomy were performed in 20 (76.9 %) and 6 (23.1%) cases, respectively. In all patients, preoperative 3D reconstruction of pulmonary vessels corresponded with the intraoperative findings. Reconstructions revealed anatomic variations in 4 (15.4%) patients. No conversion to thoracotomy or in-hospital mortality occurred. Preoperative planning with interactive 3D CT reconstruction is a useful method to enhance the surgeon's knowledge of the patient's specific anatomy and to reveal anatomic variations. Intraoperative 3D guiding in VATS with 3D vision is feasible and could contribute to the safety and accuracy of anatomic resection.

Which ultrasound transducer type is best for diagnosing pneumothorax?

BackgroundAn accurate physical examination is essential in the care of critically ill and injured patients. However, to diagnose or exclude a pneumothorax, chest auscultation is unreliable compared to lung ultrasonography. In the dynamic prehospital environment, it is desirable to have the best possible ultrasound transducer readily available. The objective is to assess the difference between a linear-array, curved-array, and phased-array ultrasound transducer in the assessment for pneumothorax and to determine which is best.MethodsIn this double-blinded, cross-sectional, observational study, 15 observers, experienced in lung ultrasonography, each assessed 66 blinded ultrasound video clips of either normal ventilation or pneumothorax that were recorded with three types of ultrasound transducers. The clips were recorded in 11 adult patients that underwent thoracoscopic lung surgery immediately before and after the surgeon opened the thorax. The diagnostic accuracy of the three transducers, elapsed time until a diagnosis was made, and the perceived image quality was recorded.ResultsIn total, 15 observers assessed 990 ultrasound video clips. The overall sensitivity and specificity were 98.2% and 97.2%, relatively. No significant difference was found in the diagnostic performance between transducers. A diagnosis was made slightly faster in the linear-array transducer clips, compared to the phased-array transducer (p = .031). For the linear-, curved-, and phased-array transducer, the image quality was rated at a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 4 (IQR 3–4), 3 (IQR 2–4), and 2 (IQR 1–2), relatively. Between the transducers, the difference in image quality was significant (p < .0001).ConclusionsThere was no difference in diagnostic performance of the three transducers. Based on image quality, the linear-array transducer might be preferred for (prehospital) lung ultrasonography for the diagnosis of pneumothorax.

Preoperative Dye Localization for Thoracoscopic Lung Surgery: Hybrid Versus Computed Tomography Room

Preoperative computed tomography (CT)-guided dye localization is essential for the surgical treatment of small lung nodules and is mostly performed by radiologists in the CT room. Several studies reported their early experiences of preoperative localization in the hybrid operating room. A comparison between localization in the CT room and hybrid room has not been reported. Therefore, we compared the outcomes of preoperative localization in the hybrid and CT rooms. This study included patients who underwent preoperative CT-guided dye localization for thoracoscopic lung tumor surgery in the hybrid operation room (n= 25) and CT room (n= 283) at our institute. Propensity matched analysis, incorporating nodule size, number, and depth, and operation method, was used to compare the short-term outcomes of these two groups. Each patient in the hybrid room group was matched with 2 patients in the CT room group. Localization was successfully performed in 23patients (92%) and 50 patients (100%) in the hybrid room and CT room groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in demographics between groups. In the hybrid room group, the global time was shorter (192.6 versus 244.1 minutes, p= 0.003), and the localization time was longer (33.1 versus 22.3 minutes, p < 0.001). All lung nodules were successfully resected in both groups, but the hybrid room group had a relatively higher morbidity rate. The hybrid operating room may be associated with a shorter global time and similar perioperative and postoperative outcomes compared with the CT room. Localization in the hybrid operating room seems an effective alternative method for managing small lung nodules.

A randomised trial of serratus anterior plane block for analgesia after thoracoscopic surgery.

We evaluated the effect of pre-operative serratus anterior plane block on postoperative pain and opioid consumption after thoracoscopic surgery. We randomly allocated 89 participants to block with 30 ml ropivacaine 0.375% (n = 44), or no block without placebo or sham procedure (n = 45). We analysed results from 42 participants in each group. Serratus anterior plane block reduced mean (SD) remifentanil dose during surgery, 0.12 (0.06) mg.h-1 vs. 0.16 (0.06) mg.h-1 , p = 0.016, and reduced mean (SD) fentanyl consumption in the first 24 postoperative hours, 3.8 (1.9) μg.kg-1 vs. 5.7 (1.6) μg.kg-1 , p = 0.000004. Block also reduced the worst median (IQR [range]) pain scores reported in the first 24 postoperative hours: 6 (5-7 [3-10]) vs. 7 (6-7 [3-10]), p = 0.027. Block decreased dissatisfaction with pain management, categorised as 'highly unsatisfactory', 'unsatisfactory', 'neutral', 'satisfactory' or 'highly satisfactory': 1/2/21/18/0 vs. 1/14/15/11/1, p = 0.0038. There were no differences in the rates of nausea, vomiting, dizziness or length of hospital stay. Serratus anterior plane block may be used to reduce pain and opioid use after thoracoscopic lung surgery.

Strategies for the prevention and control of bleeding due to vascular injury in thoracoscopic lung surgery

The technique of thoracoscopic lung surgery has gradually matured. Nowadays, thoracoscope is recommended as the most preferred approach for surgical treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer in different guidelines. However, there are still some cases of accidential major bleeding due to vascular injury during thoracoscopic lung surgery. The wall of the hilum vessels is relatively thin. These vessels often involve a great portion of the cardiac output blood flow. Once the injury happened, the emergent condition may be life-threatening due to massive blood loss. Therefore, this became an important factor which hindered the development of thoracoscopic lung surgery. In this review, details of the vascular injury in thoracoscopic lung surgery were summarized, including the incidence of vascular injury, commonly injured sites and reasons of the injuries. Among all the cases of thoracoscopic major pulmonary resection, 2.9% to 9.2% may suffer from vascular injury during the operation. The most commonly injuried sites are pulmonary artery and the branches, and this is also the most critical situation during thoracoscopic lung surgery. Hilum adhesion is the most important risk factor for vascular injury. On the one hand, the suction-compressing angiorrhaphy technique was developed for bleeding control and angioplasty. On the other hand, the strategies like pre-control of the pulmonary, cut the bronchus in advance, and fire the bronchus and pulmonary artery together may decrease the incidence of vascular injury in patients with risk factors.

Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery: anesthetic impact and perioperative experience.

Anesthesiologists and the perioperative team have a tremendous impact upon clinical outcomes in robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. As anesthesiology is developing its role outside the operating room, the patient population benefits from an expanded focus on perioperative critical care and pain management. This article focuses upon the preoperative optimization, unique intraoperative considerations for surgeons and anesthesiologists, and postoperative management of patients undergoing robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Efficacy and safety of single versus repeated stepwise cycling recruitment maneuver during one-lung ventilation in patients with normal pulmonary function undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery: a randomized, controlled trial

Background One-lung ventilation (OLV)-associated hypoxemia is a major concern and a challenge for the anesthesiologist. Lung recruitment maneuvers (RMs) are ventilator strategies in which the main goal is to restore the functional residual capacity and improve arterial oxygenation. Hemodynamic side effects are mainly associated with ‘fast’ RM not with ‘slow’ cycling RM and their effects are self-limited; therefore, they must be performed repetitively. Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single versus repeated stepwise cycling RMs during OLV in patients with normal lung function. Settings and design The study design is a randomized, double-blinded, controlled one. Patients and methods Sixty adult patients of ASA I–II who were scheduled for elective thoracoscopic lung surgery were randomized into groups C, single recruitment maneuver (SRM), and repeated recruitment maneuver (RRM) comprising 20 patients each. Group C patients received standard ventilation protocol: volume-controlled ventilation mode, VT 6 ml/kg, I : E ratio 1 : 2, positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) 5 cmH2O, and respiratory rate 10–12 breaths/min. SRM patients received standard ventilation protocol with one alveolar RM 10 min after initiation of OLV with a PEEP of 10 cmH2O until end of surgery. RRM patients received standard ventilation protocol with first RM 10 min after initiation of OLV and then repeated every 30 min during OLV and a PEEP of 10 cmH2O until end of surgery. The following were assessed: hemodynamic parameters – heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, and central venous pressure; respiratory mechanical parameters – peak airway pressure (Paw-peak), plateau pressure (Paw-plat), and static lung compliance; and oxygenation parameters – partial arterial oxygen tension (PaO2), PaO2/FiO2, and oxygen saturation (SpO2). Results PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2 ratio increased in the SRM and RRM groups after RM from T2 (10 min after first RM) to T4 (45 min from first RM), with a significant difference compared with group C (P Conclusion Single or repeated cycling RM was considered effective with high safety profile in patients with normal pulmonary function undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery using OLV.

Optimal effect-site concentration of remifentanil for preventing cough during removal of the double-lumen endotracheal tube from sevoflurane-remifentanil anesthesia: A prospective clinical trial.

Opioids are used as a treatment for coughing. Recent studies have reported an antitussive effect of remifentanil during recovery from general anesthesia by suppressed coughing. The coughing reflex may differ throughout the respiratory tract from the larynx to the bronchi. But the proper dose of remifentanil to prevent cough during double-lumen tube (DLT) extubation is unknown.Twenty-five ASA physical status 1 and 2 patients, 20 to 65 years of age who were undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery requiring 1-lung ventilation were enrolled. The effective effect-site concentration (Ce) of remifentanil for 50% and 95% of patients (EC50 and EC95) for preventing cough was determined using the isotonic regression method with a bootstrapping approach, following the Dixon up-and-down method. Recovery profiles and hemodynamic values after anesthesia were compared between patients with cough and patients without cough.EC50 and EC95 of remifentanil was 1.670 ng/mL [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.393–1.806] and 2.275 ng/mL (95% CI 1.950–2.263), respectively. There were no differences in recovery profiles and hemodynamic values after anesthesia between patients with/without cough. No patients suffered respiratory complications during the emergence period.Remifentanil can be a safe and reliable method of cough prevention during emergence from sevoflurane anesthesia after thoracic surgery requiring DLT. EC50 and EC95 of remifentanil that suppresses coughing is 1.670 and 2.275 ng/mL, respectively.

Placement of VivaSightTMdouble lumen tube

Levy-Faber et al. compared the VivaSightTM double-lumen tube with a conventional double-lumen tube (DLT) in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery 1. We would like to add our experiences of the VivaSight 2 and respond to some points in the article. The authors state that the ‘external structure and dimensions of the VivaSight are identical to those of a conventional left-sided DLT’, and used a Mallinckrodt 37 F DLT (Covidien, Boulder, CO, USA) as their control. In our study, we noted that the external diameter of the 37 Fr VivaSight is greater (15 mm vs. 11 mm) due to the profile of the camera, which may have impeded the passage of the tube below the glottis in one of our patients, but also that the lateral profile of the two tubes was different, which could impede the passage of a flexible fiberscope through the bronchial lumen. In common with similar articles published on the VivaSight 3, 4, only the 37 Fr Vivasight was manufactured at the time of the evaluation. Currently, there are other sizes available 5. The authors do not state their criteria for the selection of the appropriate size tube for the patient. In our series, we found that the Brodsky criteria 6 would not necessarily predict the VivaSight size correctly for a given tracheal diameter. Whilst we agree with the authors that there may be a cost advantage in using the VivaSight due to decreased use of the flexible fibrescope (FOB), one cannot obviate its use completely. In our experience, the quality of the VivaSight camera view is variable and influenced by the slight anterior curve of the tube, such that the trachealis muscle cannot always be visualised. Massot et al. 4 reported that three patients in whom the Vivasight could not be placed correctly without the use of a FOB had to be excluded retrospectively from their evaluation. Koopman et al. described how secretions or tissue debris can obscure the view, and how the monitor camera could malfunction 5. Examination of the bronchial extremities might be necessary to relieve mucus plugs or other obstructions. The authors’ intubation times are based upon the time ‘until the DLT position was visually verified’, but clinical checks for correct positioning (chest auscultation and movement, absence of air leak.) were not assessed. They also comment that time to intubation in the control group included the time to use the FOB, leading to a particularly prolonged ‘intubation time’. In comparison, Schuepbach et al. 3 found that the mean time to correct placement by auscultation for the VivaSight vs conventional DLT was 63 s vs 97 s. Finally, the authors mention that continuous direct observation of DLT position avoids displacement of the tube, but do not comment on the number of intra-operative displacements in their article. In our series, displacement occurred in three out of seven cases and using the camera, the tube was replaced easily. Massot et al. described displacement in 40 of 77 patients 4.

Experiences and challenges of thorcoscopic lung surgery in the pediatric age group

BackgroundWe report a single-center study of minimally invasive thoracoscopic lung surgery with pediatric patients. MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent thoracoscopic lung surgery between 2004 and 2013. The procedures were divided into anatomic and non-anatomical lung resections. ResultsSeventy-six patients with a mean age of 6.5 years (range: 7 days–17 years) and a mean weight of 11 kg (range: 2.6–56.0 kg) received thoracoscopic lung surgery for tumor metastases (n = 20), sequestration/congenital adenomatoid malformation (19), cysts (12), aspergillomas (7), bullae (5), middle lobe syndrome (3), bronchiectasis (3), emphysema (2), and other reasons (5). Twenty-nine anatomical lung resections (Group I: lobectomies, segmentectomies) and 47 non-anatomical lung resections (Group II: wedge resections, lung tissue-sparing surgery) were performed. In 6 cases, preoperative CT-guided coiling was used to localize the lung lesions. Specimen removal was achieved using a widened (2 cm) trocar site. The operating times of Group I patients were longer compared than those of Group II patients (means: 154 and 68 min, respectively); conversion rates (8 versus 2), chest tube insertion rates (100% versus 51%), and postoperative ventilation (48% versus 13%) also differed. ConclusionThoracoscopic anatomical lung resections appear to be safe and effective in infants and children. In congenital lung diseases, the key to success is the intraoperative destruction of space-occupying lesions. Limitations exist in cases with infectious adhesions. Non-anatomical lung resections are technically easier and should remain standard in pediatric surgery. Limitations exist in cases of metastases, which are deep within the parenchyma and are not visible on the lung surface.

Technical strategy for dealing with bleeding during thoracoscopic lung surgery.

Uncontrollable bleeding caused by vascular injury is an important reason for conversion to thoracotomy during thoracoscopic lung surgery. Demmy et al. (1) summarized several effective methods for dealing with bleeding, such as the use of thrombostatic material, biological sealant, or discreet utilization of energy sources. However, managing more severe bleeding is quite challenging even for experienced thoracoscopic surgeons. The most common solution for this situation is compression or tamponade of the injured site while converting to open thoracotomy (1,2). We have previously described a series of skills named the “suction-compressing angiorrhaphy technique (SCAT)” for dealing with severe bleeding due to vascular injury during thoracoscopic lung surgery (3). Bleeding control and angiorrhaphy were both achieved through thoracoscopy in most of the cases of vascular injury in our center. Here, we present our technical strategy for dealing with bleeding and vascular injury during thoracoscopic lung surgery with a video series.

Total thoracoscopic lung segmentectomy of anterior basal segment of the right lower lobe (RS8) for NSCLC stage IA (case report)

A 69-year-old woman with a pulmonary nodule in anterior basal segment of the right lower lobe (RS8) was referred to our department. The diameter of the tumor was 12 mm, and it had increased over a few months. First, video-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery (VATS) biopsy of the pulmonary nodule was carried out. Frozen section examination of this nodule confirmed the diagnosis of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC). Segmentectomy of RS8 with lower mediastinal node dissection (ND2a-1) was performed. The intersegmental plane was identified using the intersegmental veins as landmarks and the demarcation between the resected (inflated) and preserved (collapsed) lungs. Electrocautery at 70 watts was used to divide the intersegmental plane. A vessel sealing system was used to seal and cut the pulmonary arteries. Postoperative histopathological examination revealed that the tumor was T1aN0M0 BAC, and the minimal distance between the surgical margin and the tumor edge was 15 mm. The patient was discharged from hospital on postoperative day 5 without any complications.

Thoracoscopic Lung Surgery in Infants and Children: The State of the Art.

Thoracosopic surgery was first introduced in the early 1900s, but advances in the last 20 years have dramatically altered how pulmonary and extrapulmonary thoracic lesions in infants and children are now approached. Advances in equipment and technique now allow for most common thoracic surgeries to be approached through a series of small 3 and 5 mm incisions, using a telescope and digital camera to provide magnified images of the thoracic cavity. Large series of relatively simple procedures such as lung biopsy, and more complex operations such as lobectomy have clearly shown that these techniques are safe and effective, and associated with significantly less morbidity then the standard open thoracotomy.