Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm Repair Research Articles

The impact of large aneurysm diameter on the outcomes of thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair by fenestrated and branched endografts.

Aim of the study was to analyze the impact of preoperative thoraco-abdominal aneurysm diameter on the outcomes of fenestrated/branched endografting. Patients underwent endovascular thoraco-abdominal repair at 2 European centers (2011-2021) were analyzed. Median diameter was calculated; third quartile was considered as cut-off. Outcomes were compared in two groups based on the diameter value. Primary end-points were technical success, spinal cord ischaemia and 30-day/in-hospital mortality. Survival, freedom-from-reintervention and target-visceral-vessels instability were follow-up outcomes. Out of 247 thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms, the median diameter was 65 mm, first quartile was 57 mm; third quartile was 80 mm, set as cut-off value. Fifty-nine(24%) patients had diameter ≥80mm. Custom-Made and off-the-shelf branched endograft were used in 160(65%) and 87(35%), respectively. Technical success was 93% (<80mm : 91% vs ≥80mm : 94%; P:0.47). Twenty-three(9%) patients had spinal injury (<80mm : 7% vs ≥80mm : 17%; P:0.03). Twenty-two(9%) patients died within 30-day/in-hospital (<80mm : 7%; vs ≥80mm : 15%; P:0.06). Multivariate analysis did not report pre-operative diameter ≥80mm as significant risk factor for primary end-points. The median follow-up was 13 (interquartile-range : 2-37) months and at 3-years survival and freedom from reintervention rates were 65% and 62%, respectively. After univariate and multivariate analysis preoperative diameter ≥80mm was considered an independent risk factor for reinterventions (HR : 1.9; 95% CI : 1.1-3.6; P:0.04), and for target visceral vessels instability (HR : 3.1; 95% CI : 1.3-5.1; P:0.04), occurred in 45(18%) cases. However after competing risk methods preoperative diameter did not show significance for follow-up results. A pre-operative thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter greater than 80 mm has not a direct impact on early technical and clinical outcomes. Diameter ≥80mm is considered risk-factor for reinterventions and target-vessels instability considered separately during follow-up.

Custom-Made Device (CMD) for the Repair of Thoraco-Abdominal Aneurysm (TAA): Mid-Long Term Outcomes from a Single Southeast Asian Centre Experience in Singapore.

Introduction: Given the high risk of peri-operative morbidity and mortality associated with open repair, endovascular repair for thoraco-abdominal aneurysms is increasingly performed. This study aims to describe mid to long-term results for patients who were treated with COOK Custom-Made Endograft Device at a single Southeast Asian tertiary centre. Methods: Mid to long-term results of patients treated from 2012 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Indications for treatment were aortic diameter > 5.5 cm, enlargement > 5 mm in 6 months or high-risk morphology. Clinical, operative, early to late complications and reintervention details were captured. The endpoints were technical success, primary patency and primary assisted patency. Results: Electronic medical records of 29 consecutive patients (64.4 ± 1.6 years old; 26/29 males 89.6%) were reviewed. 24/29 (83%) were hypertensive, and 20/29 (69%) were smokers. The mean diameter was 5.5 cm, and the majority were treated for Crawford type IV (19/29, 65.5%). Endograft deployment was 100%. Catheterisation of fenestration was successful in 109/116 (94%). 30-day mortality and morbidity were observed in 12/29 (41%), for which access site complications were most common. No significant haemorrhage or graft explant was recorded. The mean follow-up period was 32.4 months (range 1-108 months). Primary patency was 92.9% (95% CI: 83.8-100.0) at 6 months and decreased to 77.7% (95% CI: 63.4-95.2) at 24 months. Sac shrinkage or stability was noted in 17/29 (58.6%). Re-intervention was performed in 9/29 (31%) for limb occlusion (2/9, 22.2%), renal artery stent occlusion (1/9, 11.1%) and endoleaks (6/9, 66.6%). Assisted patency was maintained at 100% for 12 months before decreasing to 66.7% (95% CI: 37.9-100.0) at 24 months. Conclusions: The study reports the first mid-long-term result in this region, though limited by the sample size. Re-intervention at 30% suggests that disease and procedures remain challenging, emphasising the need to assimilate lessons and experience at high-volume centres.

Women Experience Higher Rates of Mortality Following Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

ObjectivesThoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and complex endovascular thoraco-abdominal aneurysm repair (cEVAR) has been increasingly adopted in the treatment of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta aneurysms, offering a less invasive approach for patients with appropriate anatomy. Women usually present with smaller aortic diameter. However, they usually have greater aneurysm growth rates. How sex can affect postoperative and short-term outcomes after TEVAR is not well reported. The aim of this study was to assess outcomes in female versus male patients undergoing TEVAR for treatment of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysms in a Medicare-linked database. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing TEVAR for thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network (VISION) database from 2003 to 2018. Patients were divided into males and females. Patients presented with ruptured aneurysm were excluded from the analysis. Postoperative outcomes included in-hospital stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), spinal cord ischemia, and 30-day mortality. One-year outcomes included mortality, aneurysmal rupture, and reintervention. Postoperative outcomes were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis and one-year outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan Meier Survival and Cox regression analyses. ResultsA total of 3,058 males and 1,843 females were available for the analysis. Female patients had smaller median aortic diameter, were more likely to be black, with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic kidney disease, and to be symptomatic on presentation. Male patients were more likely to be on preoperative medications such as aspirin, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, P2Y12 antagonists, and anticoagulants. After adjusting for potential confounders, female gender was associated with double the risk of in-hospital stroke (OR: 2.3, 95%CI ((1.5-3.7), P<0.001) and 80% increase in 30-day mortality (OR: 1.8, 95%CI (1.3-2.6), P=0.001). At one year, female gender was associated with a higher risk of mortality (HR: 1.2, 95%CI (1.05-1.4), P=0.011). There was a trend towards higher risk of reintervention (HR: 1.2, 95%CI (0.97-1.6), P=0.079). ConclusionsMortality after TEVAR seems to be higher in female patients at 30 days and up to one year of follow-up. Female patients also face a two times higher risk of in-hospital stroke. Future studies with a larger female population should aim to identify and potentially ameliorate the factors associated with these unfavorable outcomes in females.

Outcomes of Deep Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest for Descending and Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm Repair

ObjectiveDeep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) in patients undergoing descending (DTAA) or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We present our outcomes after open DTAA and TAAA repair with and without DHCA. MethodsFrom 1999 to 2022, 81 (38.8%) patients undergoing DTAA or TAAA repair required DHCA because proximal cross-clamping was not feasible or aneurysmal pathology extended into the arch and 128 (61.2%) patients required only distal bypass. Because of intrinsic pathological differences in patients requiring DHCA, confidence intervals were used to compare groups in lieu of formal hypothesis tests. ResultsDHCA patients had more chronic dissections (64.2% vs 43.8%, 95% CI for difference: 6% - 35%) and higher BMIs (29.5 ± 6.8 vs 27.2 ± 6.6, CI: 26% - 421%). More non-DHCA patients had medial degeneration (9.9% vs 31.3%, CI: -33% - -7%). There were 10 (12.4%) in-hospital deaths for the DHCA and 10 (7.8%) for the non-DHCA group (CI: -5% - 14%). Survival at 10 years was 52.6% (CI: 42.1%-65.7%) for the non-DHCA group and 48.3% (CI: 40.3%-57.9%) for the DHCA group. The only meaningful differences in postoperative outcomes were ICU (5.5 days vs 6 days, CI: 12%-410%) and hospital stay (19 days vs 12 days, CI: 74%-470%), which were longer in the DHCA group. ConclusionsDespite longer ICU and hospital length of stays, selective use of DHCA is safe and effective with comparable morbidity and mortality to non-DHCA in open DTAA and TAAA repair.

Commentary on cerebrospinal fluid drain pilot study in high-risk fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair

Commentary on cerebrospinal fluid drain pilot study in high-risk fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair

Intestinal Fatty Acid–Binding Protein as a Potential Biomarker for Gastrointestinal Complications after Complex Endovascular Aortic Surgery

This study aimed to investigate the association between intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP), acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) grade, and gastrointestinal (GI) complications after fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. A total of 17 patients undergoing endovascular aortic repair for thoracoabdominal, juxtarenal, suprarenal, or pararenal aneurysm between May 2017 and September 2018 were enrolled. Blood samples were collected preoperatively and during postoperative intensive care. The blood samples were analyzed for I-FABP with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Gastrointestinal function was assessed according to the AGI grade every day during postoperative intensive care. Higher concentrations of I-FABP at 24hr and 48 hr correlated to higher AGI grade on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3 (P=0.032 and P=0.048, P=0.040 and P=0.018, and P=0.012 and P=0.016, respectively). Patients who developed a GI complication within 90days postoperatively had a higher overall AGI grade than those who did not develop a GI complication (P<0.001), as well as higher concentrations of I-FABP at 48 hrs (P=0.019). Patients developing GI dysfunction (AGI grade ≥2) had a higher frequency of complications (P=0.009) and longer length of stay in the intensive care unit (P=0.008). In patients undergoing endovascular aortic repair for complex aneurysm increased postoperative plasma I-FABP concentrations and postoperative GI dysfunction, evaluated using the AGI grade, were associated with GI complications, indicating that these measures may be useful in the postoperative management of these patients.

Center-level outcomes following elective fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative database

ObjectiveHospital volume is associated with mortality after open aortic aneurysm repair. Fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (B-FEVAR) has been increasingly used for repair of complex thoracoabdominal and juxtarenal aneurysms, but evidence of a center-volume relationship is limited. We aimed to measure the association of center volume with in-hospital mortality, postoperative outcomes, and 1-year survival following B-FEVAR. MethodsPatients undergoing elective endovascular thoracoabdominal and complex abdominal aneurysm repair with branch intervention (2014-2021) listed within the national Vascular Quality Initiative Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair/Complex EVAR database were analyzed. Centers were grouped into quartiles by mean annual procedure volume. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate the effect of center volume on in-hospital mortality adjusting for baseline and procedural characteristics. Kaplan-Meier estimation, log rank test, and mixed effects Cox regression were used to evaluate 1-year survival. ResultsA total of 4302 adult elective F-BEVAR procedures were identified at a total of 163 centers. In-hospital mortality did not differ by hospital volume (quartile [Q]1 = 35/1059 [3.3%]; Q2 = 30/1063 [2.8%]; Q3 = 33/1120 [2.9%]; and Q4 = 44/1060 [4.2%]; P = .308). The high volume group had a higher rate of major complication (Q1 = 14.9%; Q2 = 12.8%; Q3 = 13.3%; and Q4 = 20.1%; adjusted P < .001). Physician-modified grafts were more frequently employed in high-volume centers (Q1 = 4.5%; Q2 = 18.7%; Q3 = 11.3%; and Q4 = 19.2%; P < .001), with a decreased incidence of any endoleak noted at the end of the procedure (Q1 = 34.9%; Q2 = 32.8%; Q3 = 30.0%; and Q4 = 29.0%; P = .003). In the multivariable analysis, in-hospital mortality was not associated with center volume, comparing very low volume to medium- and high-volume centers (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] vs Q4: Q1 = 1.1 [0.6-1.9], Q2 = 0.6 [0.4-1.1], and Q3 = 0.9 [0.5-1.5]; all P > .05). No significant difference was found in 1-year survival between center volume groups. ConclusionsIn-hospital mortality is not associated with procedure volume within centers performing complex endovascular aortic repair. However, complication rates and endoleak may be associated with procedure volume. Long-term outcomes by annualized procedure volume, specifically graft durability and sac expansion, should be investigated.

Intravascular Iliac Artery Lithotripsy to Facilitate Aortic Endograft Delivery: Midterm Results of a Dual-Center Experience.

To assess the feasibility and safety of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) for enabling transfemoral abdominal (EVAR), thoracic (TEVAR), and thoracoabdominal (BEVAR) endovascular aneurysm repair in patients with narrow and calcified iliac arteries. Consecutive patients treated with IVL for severe calcified and narrowed iliac access before EVAR, TEVAR, or BEVAR between November 2020 and June 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. All anatomical iliac characteristics were acquired by multi-planar reconstruction of preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA). The hostility of the vascular accesses was classified based on Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System (PACSS) and calcified access severity score (CASS), a new score considering both anatomical (calcium grade and length, minimum lumen diameter [MLD], and tortuosity index) and aortic stent-graft (SG/MLD index) parameters. Primary endpoint was technical success defined as successful aortic endograft delivery and deployment without iliac rupture. Freedom from complications and primary patency were additionally analyzed. Twenty-eight iliac axes were treated with IVL (8 bilateral) in 20 patients (mean age 74.5±6.7 years) with a mean follow-up of 26.5±6.2 (range 17-36) months. Ten patients underwent EVAR: 3 TEVAR, and 7 BEVAR procedures. In 14 patients (70%), aneurysm disease was associated with symptomatic aorto-iliac occlusive disease (AIOD), with Rutherford class III to IV. The PACSS was grade IV in 89% of the cases and the CASS (mean 14±2) was grade III to IV in all cases. The stent-graft (SG) outer diameter (5.60±1.65 mm) was significantly larger by 50% than MLD (3.96±1.20 mm), with an SG/MLD index of 1.50±0.51 (p<0.001). Technical success was 100%. No dissection, rupture, or distal embolization occurred. One (3.4%) bail-out stenting was necessary as endoconduit after IVL treatment. One month CTA showed that postoperative luminal gain increased by 93% (p<0.001). An improvement of 2 Rutherford classes occurred in all AIOD patients with a primary patency of 100% at last follow-up. This study shows the safety and feasibility of IVL as a valuable option to treat narrow and calcified iliac arteries to facilitate endograft delivery. Further studies will be useful to confirm these results. In this article, the use of intravascular iliac artery lithotripsy to facilitate aortic endograft delivery is explored. The presence of iliac severe calcifications still represents a contraindication for aortic endovascular repair. Intravascular lithotripsy increases the feasibility and safety of endovascular aortic procedures, facilitating endograft delivery and reducing the risk of iliac rupture and/or dissections by improving vessel compliance and luminal gain. This novel vessel preparation could be an alternative to "paving and cracking" and/or iliac conduits. This study describes a new score to classify the severity of iliac calcifications, considering anatomical parameters and the profile of aortic endografts delivery system.

Thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair using the Unitary Manifold Device

ObjectiveTo present a single-center prospective study of 126 consecutively treated patients who underwent endovascular repair of a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm with the physician-modified, nonanatomic-based Unitary Manifold (UM) device. MethodsData were collected from 126 consecutive all-comer patients treated with the physician-modified, nonanatomic-based UM from 2015 to 2023. Treatment was performed at a single center by a single physician under a Physician Sponsored Investigation Exemption G140207. ResultsThe UM was indicated for repair of all Crawford extents including juxtarenal, pararenal, and short-neck infrarenal aneurysms (<10 mm) in 126 consecutive patients. Patients were not excluded from the study based on presentation, extent of aneurysm or dissection, or history of a spinal cord event. Patients with a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm were categorized by Crawford classification: types I and V (3.3%, n = 4), type II (3.3%, n = 4), type III (1%, n = 1), and type IV (93.3%, n = 117). The type IV classification patients were further categorized with 33 (28.2%) true type IV, 68 (58.1%) pararenal or infrarenal, and 16 (13.7%) with dissection. Technical success was 99.2% (n = 125). The most common major adverse event within both 30 days and 365 days of all patients was respiratory failure (11.9%, n = 15, and 13.5%, n = 17, respectively). One patient (0.8%) experienced persistent paraplegia at 365 days. Reintervention for patients at 365 days was 5.6% (n = 7). Of the 444 branches stented, the primary patency rate was remarkably high as only three patients (2.4%) required reintervention due to loss of limb patency within 365 days. Aneurysm enlargement (≥5 mm) occurred in 1.6% (n = 2) patients, and no patients experienced aneurysm rupture. No patients underwent conversion to open repair. The aneurysm-related mortality at 365 days for all patients was 4.0% (n = 5), whereas all-cause mortality was 16.7% (n = 21). Physician-modified endograft device integrity failure was not observed in any patient. ConclusionsThe UM device demonstrated remarkable technical surgical success, treatment success, and device patency rates with very reasonable major adverse events and reintervention rates. This study is the most representative example of the general population in comparison with other studies of off-the-shelf devices, with 126 consecutive all-comer patients with diverse pathologies.

Parallel intercostal artery stenting and exclusion of symptomatic bucket-handle intercostal patch aneurysm

Intercostal patch aneurysms after open thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair represent a challenging pathology, with highly variable patient anatomy and spinal cord ischemia risk. We present a case of a 51-year-old man with a large symptomatic “bucket-handle” loop graft intercostal patch aneurysm, which was treated with endovascular exclusion with concurrent parallel intercostal stent grafting. This case highlights specialized endovascular techniques to treat intercostal patch aneurysms and the necessity of meticulous operative case planning in both open and endovascular thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair.

Risk Factors for Spinal Cord Injury during Endovascular Repair of Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm: Review of the Literature and Proposal of a Prognostic Score.

Despite recent improvements, spinal cord ischemia remains the most feared and dramatic complication following extensive aortic repair. Although endovascular procedures are associated with a lower risk compared with open procedures, this risk is still significant and must be considered. A combined medical and surgical approach may help to optimize the tolerance of the spinal cord to ischemia. The aim of this review is to describe the underlying mechanism involved in spinal cord injury during extensive endovascular aortic repair, to describe the different techniques used to improve spinal cord tolerance to ischemia-including the prophylactic or curative use of spinal drainage-and to propose our algorithm for spinal cord protection and the rational use of spinal drainage.

Surgeon Volumes of Endovascular Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm Repairs are Associated With Outcomes

Surgeon Volumes of Endovascular Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm Repairs are Associated With Outcomes

Transvenous Access for Emergent Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Patients Without Femoral Access.

To describe the technique of transvenous access for emergent endovascular repair of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysms exemplified with 2 cases. Transvenous access to the aorta is described as an alternative access method to deliver aortic endografts in emergency situations. A 68-year-old female patient with severely compromised iliac and subclavian artery access was treated for a ruptured extent V thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm with a t-Branch (Cook Medical, Bjaeverskov, Denmark) delivered through a transcaval access. To avoid severe aortocaval shunting a balloon-expandable covered stent was deployed through a carotid access due to severe bilateral subclavian ostial stenosis. A 71-year-old man with an acute type B aortic dissection and bilateral narrow long-segment stenting of the iliac arteries was treated with a physician-modified thoracic endovascular aortic repair using an arteriovenous fenestration created at the level of the common iliac artery. We describe the access creation by fenestration using a transseptal needle. Transvenous access for thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is safe and feasible in selected emergent cases. A transvenous approach may be helpful in selected patients when an endovascular repair needs to be performed but no arterial femoral access is available. This approach proved to be feasible even with large-bore introducer sheaths, taking its place in the armamentarium of the vascular surgeon for emergent complex endovascular aortic repairs.

The Elevator Technique: A New Bailout Maneuver to Achieve Target Vessel Patency During Challenging BEVAR.

The purpose of the study is to describe a new bailout maneuver for use during branched endovascular thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair (BEVAR) while dealing with challenging target vessel cannulation. A 54-year-old woman underwent urgent BEVAR with a low-profile T-branch device to exclude a type 2 thoracoabdominal aneurysm (TAAA). The endovascular procedure was challenging because the left renal artery ostium was covered by the endograft fabric, compounded by diseased target vessels. A novel bailout maneuver is described. After angioplasty of the left renal artery (LRA), the LRA remained precannulated and a low-profile T-branch was implanted. The 3 proximal branches (superior mesenteric artery, inferior mesenteric artery, and the right renal artery) were connected to their respective target vessels swiftly with a steerable sheath from a femoral approach. Access to the left renal artery was not achieved because it was obstructed by the fully deployed endograft. We subsequently stented the LRA over the "pre-positioned buddy wire," using a balloon-expandable covered stent protruding inside the aneurysm lumen. The proximal stent was then flared and lifted upward using an 8.5 Fr steerable sheath, which made cannulation and stenting of the LRA through the side-branch from above finally achievable. The elevator technique described in this article will help achieve technical success in challenging BEVAR cases. We describe in this technical note the "elevator technique" that will complement the "Snare-Ride" and "Balloon Anchoring" techniques over a buddy wire positioned in a target vessel, to provide successful bailout options for challenging TV cannulations during BEVAR.After failed access to the renal artery through the renal branch, a covered stent was implanted in the renal artery over the buddy wire with 10 mm protruding into the aortic lumen. This stent was then flared, prior to advancing a curved steerable sheath into the stent, which shaped it with a superior-facing funneled aortic segment. This maneuver resulted in the renal stent facing its corresponding branch, finally easy to access from the endograft lumen.

A multidisciplinary multistage complete mega aorta replacement and utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair.

A 49-year-old woman underwent a 11-month multistage complete replacement of a mega aorta. Replacement stages included ascending aorta and arch replacement in conjunction with a frozen elephant trunk thoracic endovascular aortic repair, extension of thoracic endovascular aortic repair to zone 5, and open repair of the thoracoabdominal aneurysm with the use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for circulatory support. This case illustrates the complexity of repairing a mega aorta, the multidisciplinary care and staging needed for repair, and the use of peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for circulatory perfusion during thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair.

In-hospital cost-effectiveness analysis of open versus staged fenestrated/branched endovascular elective repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms

In-hospital cost-effectiveness analysis of open versus staged fenestrated/branched endovascular elective repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms

Further research is warranted to identify optimal bridging stent and antiplatelet regimens following fenestrated/branched repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms

Further research is warranted to identify optimal bridging stent and antiplatelet regimens following fenestrated/branched repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms

Renal Artery Reimplantation Versus Bypass in Elective Open Aneurysm Repair

Complex open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair often necessitates revascularization of renal arteries by either renal artery reimplantation or bypass. This study aims to evaluate the perioperative and short term outcomes between these two strategies of renal artery revascularization. We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent open AAA repair from 2004-2020 at our own institution. Patients who underwent elective suprarenal, juxtarenal, or type 4 thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair were identified using current procedural terminology (CPT) codes as well as a retrospectively maintained database of AAA patients. Patients who had symptomatic aneurysm or significant renal artery stenosis prior to AAA repair were excluded. Patient demographics, intraoperative conditions, renal function, bypass patency and perioperative and postoperative outcome at 30 days and 1 year were compared. 143 patients underwent either renal artery reimplantation (n=86) or bypass (n=57) during this time period. The mean age was 69.7 years and 76.2% of the patients were male. Median preoperative creatinine was 1.2 mg/dL for the renal bypass group vs 1.06 mg/dL for reimplantation (P=0.088). Both groups had similar median preoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of >60 mL/min (P=0.13). Bypass and reimplantation groups had similar perioperative complications including acute kidney injury (51.8% vs 49.4% P=0.78), inpatient dialysis (3.6% vs 1.2% P=0.56), myocardial infarction (1.8% vs 2.4% P=0.99), and death (3.5% vs 4.7% P=0.99), respectively. During the 30 day follow-up period, renal artery stenosis was identified in 9.8% of bypasses and 6.7% of reimplantations (P=0.71). 6.1% of patients in the bypass group had renal failure requiring dialysis (both acute and permanent) compared to 1.3% in reimplantation group (P=0.3). For those who had 1 year follow up, the reimplantation group had higher new incidence of renal artery stenosis compared to bypass group (6 vs. 0 p=0.16). Given that there is no significant difference in outcomes between renal artery reimplantation and bypass within 30 days or at 1 year follow-up, both bypass and re-implantation are acceptable means for renal artery revascularization during elective AAA repair.

New Preloaded System for Renal and Visceral Arteries in Fenestrated Endografting.

The New Preloaded System (NPS) for renal/visceral arteries (TVVs) is an emerging technology in fenestrated endografting (FEVAR) that allows TVVs cannulation and stenting through the same access of the endograft main body. However, only few preliminary experiences are currently available in the literature. The aim of this study is to report the outcomes of NPS-FEVAR in juxta/para-renal (J/P-AAAs) and thoracoabdominal (TAAAs) aneurysms repair. This is a prospective (NCT05224219), single-center/observational study of patients submitted to NPS-FEVAR for J/PAAAs and TAAAs between 2019 and 2022 (July). Definitions and outcomes were evaluated according to the current SVS-reporting standard. Technical success (TS) and TS preloaded related, spinal cord ischemia (SCI), and 30-day mortality were assessed as early endpoints. Survival, freedom from reinterventions (FFRs), and freedom from TTVs-instability (FFTVVs-instability) were analyzed during follow-up. Among 157 F/B-EVAR cases, 74 (47%) NPS-FEVAR were planned and enrolled in the study [48 (65%) J/P-AAAs; 26 (35%) TAAAs]. The main indication for NPS-FEVAR was the presence of a hostile iliac axis (54%-73%) or the necessity of expeditious pelvic/lower-limb reperfusion for SCI prevention in TAAAs (20%-27%). Overall, 292 TVVs were accommodated by 289 fenestrations and 3 branches; 188 of 289 (65%) fenestrations were preloaded. NPS-FEVAR configuration was from "below" and "from below to above" in 28 (38%) and 46 (62%) cases, respectively. TS and TS preloaded system-related was 96% (71/74) and 99% (73/74), respectively. Target visceral vessels patency at the completion angiography was 99% (290/292). Failures were 2 renal arteries loss and 1 massive bleeding from a percutaneous closure system breakage. The latter patient developed postoperative multiorgans failure and died on the fifth postoperative day, causing only 30-day/in-hospital mortality (1.3%). One (1.3%) patient with a JAAA and preoperative bilateral occlusion of the hypogastric arteries suffered SCI. The median follow-up was 14 (IQR: 8) months. The estimated 3-year survival was 91% with no aneurysm-related mortality during follow-up. The estimated 3-year FFR and FFTVVs-instability were 85 and 92%, respectively. New preloaded system FEVAR is a safe and effective option in the treatment of J/PAAAs and TAAAs in the presence of hostile iliac access or to guarantee an expeditious pelvic/lower limb reperfusion, leading to satisfactory results in terms of TS, early and mid-term clinical outcomes. New preloaded system for fenestrated and branched endografting allows to increase the feasibility of the advanced endovascular aortic repair in challenging iliac access, thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair and reduce difficulties in target visceral vessels cannulation.

Spinal cord ischemia rates and prophylactic spinal drainage in patients treated with fenestrated/branched endovascular repair for thoracoabdominal aneurysms

ObjectiveSpinal cord ischemia (SCI) is a devastating complication after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. The benefit of prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid drainage (pCSFD) to prevent SCI is still under investigation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the SCI rate and the impact of pCSFD following complex endovascular repair (fenestrated or branched endovascular repair [F/BEVAR]) for type I to IV TAAA. MethodsThe STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement was followed. A single-center retrospective study was conducted, including all consecutive patients, managed for TAAA type I to IV using F/BEVAR, between January 1, 2018, and November 1, 2022, for degenerative and post-dissection aneurysms. Patients with juxta- or pararenal aneurysms were excluded, as well as cases managed urgently for aortic rupture or acute dissection. After 2020, pCSFD in type I to III TAAAs was abandoned and replaced by therapeutic CSFD (tCSFD), performed only in patients presenting SCI. The primary outcome was the perioperative SCI rate for the entire cohort and the role of pCSFD for type I to III TAAAs. ResultsIn total, 198 patients were included (mean age, 71.1±3.4 years; 81.8% males), including 50.5% with type I to III TAAA. The primary technical success was 94.9%. The perioperative mortality was 2.5%. and the major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) rate was 10.6%; 4.5% presented SCI of any type (2.5% paraplegia). When comparing the SCI group with the remaining cohort, patients with SCI presented higher MACE (66.7% vs 7.9%; P < .001) rate and longer intensive care unit stay (3.5 vs 1 day; P = .002). Following type I to III repair, similar SCI, paraplegia, and paraplegia with no recovery rates were reported in the pCSFD and tCSFD groups (7.3% vs 5.1%; P = .66; 4.8% vs 3.3%; P = .72; and 2% vs 0%; P = .37). ConclusionsThe incidence of SCI after TAAA I to IV endovascular repair was low. SCI was associated with significantly increased MACE and intensive care unit stay. The prophylactic use of CSFD in type I to III TAAAs was not associated with lower SCI rates and may not be justified routinely.