Keywords Basilic vein Complications PerioperativeinsertionTo the Editor:Although the first approach to central venous catheter-ization (CVC) under general anesthesia would generally bethe right internal jugular vein, this procedure is dangerouswhen patients are receiving anti-coagulant therapy or havelow platelet counts. We also note that, in the trendelenburgposition, the left internal jugular vein cannot be dilated,and the approach via the left internal jugular vein is alsodangerous for thoracic duct puncture. Central cathetershave been peripherally inserted via the basilic vein sincethe 1970s [1]. The advantages of peripherally insertedcentral catheters (PICCs) are low complication rates, easyaccess, reduced overall nursing required for i.v. mainte-nance, and low cost [2]. Perioperative insertion of a PICCvia the basilic vein would therefore confer some advanta-ges, and ultrasound-guided and radiographic monitoring-assisted insertion adds more safety and provides optimalmanagement. We therefore performed a clinical trial ofperioperative PICC insertion under ultrasound guidanceand radiographic monitoring.Fourteen patients scheduled for surgical repair ofabdominal aortic aneurysms were prospectively enrolled.The basilic vein in the upper arm was visualized using a4-F Groshong catheter (Medicon, Osaka, Japan) and a6- to 13-MHz ultrasound probe (Vivid i ; GE HealthcareJapan, Tokyo, Japan). The position of the PICC tip wasalso confirmed by radiographic monitoring. Briefly, eitherthe right or left upper arm was rotated 90 and then a 14-Gcannula was inserted into the vein under real-time ultra-sound guidance with a jobbing motion. When blood back-flowed from the vein, the PICC was directly inserted intothe basilic vein. The PICC was then advanced or with-drawn under radiographic monitoring to reach the preferredsite location. Forceful aspiration was added to obtain bloodreturn after the removal of the guidewire in the PICC. Anadditional catheter was cut and a sterile dressing waspositioned over the external portion of the PICC.The mean age of the patients was 71 years (range55–82). The tip of the PICC was successfully positioned in11 (78.6 %) of the 14 patients but became dislodged in 3(21.4 %) patients. The PICC tip was not advanced to thesuperior vena cava. Serious complications, such as infec-tion, accidental puncture of an artery, or injury of mediannerve, did not occur during PICC insertion in any patient.We had perioperatively inserted a CVC under landmarkor ultrasound guidance; therefore, the question arose as towhat should be done when a CVC could not be inserted viathe right internal jugular vein. Goldfarb and Lebrec [3]described difficulties with cannulation from the left internaljugular vein. However, both long- and short-term PICCplacement in infants and children has proven safe andeffective [4], although the PICC tip can quite frequentlybecome dislodged. Thus, ultrasound guidance and radio-graphic monitoring are important. Fricke et al. [5] reportedthat PICC placement was more successful with thanwithout radiographic monitoring. The PICC tip becamedislodged in three of our patients in whom the right basilic
Read full abstract