ThermoCool SmartTouch Research Articles

Pattern Matching Filter and multielectrode mapping catheter – A new approach for complex premature ventricular contraction ablation

PurposeOur goal was to assess usefulness of Pattern Matching Filter (PMF) software combined with the PentaRay catheter for complex premature ventricular contraction (PVC) ablation. MethodsA prospective observational study of consecutive patients referred for complex PVC ablation at our tertiary center from January to September 2018. Patients underwent ablation using a pre-specified mapping strategy with the PMF and the PentaRay catheter (PVCs with ≥97% correlation with the template morphology were collected). Procedural endpoints and acute and 12-months success rates were assessed and compared to a retrospective cohort of patients who also underwent a complex PVC ablation with standard activation mapping performed with a Thermocool SmartTouch catheter. ResultsDuring the nine-month enrollment period, seven patients fulfilled our inclusion criteria, while there were four patients in the control group. Patients treated with the PMF and PentaRay had a fivefold number of points acquired (507±213 vs. 90±62) and a halved procedure time (67±42 vs.130±54 min), required a shorter radiofrequency ablation time (294±112 vs.706±613 sec) and had a higher overall success rate (100% vs.75%) when compared to the standard approach. No major complications occurred in either group. ConclusionsIn this first study assessing the combined use of the PentaRay catheter and the PMF for complex PVCs ablation, we demonstrate how this approach can improve the level of detail, accuracy and reliability of the activation map, while reducing the number of radiofrequency applications and procedural time. Further studies are warranted to confirm whether this approach can lead to improved outcomes.

Temperature- and flow-controlled ablation/very-high-power short-duration ablation vs conventional power-controlled ablation: Comparison of focal and linear lesion characteristics

The QDOT MICRO catheter allows temperature- and flow-controlled (TFC) ablation and very-high-power short-duration (vHPSD) ablation. The purpose of this study was to compare lesion characteristics between TFC/vHPSD ablation and standard power-controlled (PC) ablation. Lesion characteristics in the right atrium, left atrium, and right ventricle (RV) of 6 sheep were compared between vHPSD (90 W/4 seconds, TC mode with 60°C target using QDOT) and standard radiofrequency settings (PC mode, 30 W/30 seconds with ThermoCool SmartTouch SF). Lesions in the left ventricle (LV) were compared, targeting 50 W for 60-second applications. Forty-six focal atrial lesions, 50 RV focal lesions, and 12 linear lesions were created by vHPSD ablation and PC ablation in each group of 6 animals. vHPSD ablation produced significantly larger focal atrial lesions in length (8.3 [6.4-9.7] mm vs 6.3 [5.2-7.4] mm; P = .0002), width (6.0 [5.3-6.9] mm vs 4.6 [3.8-5.4] mm; P <.0001), and surface area (39.4 [25.4-52.4] mm2 vs 23.6 [16.0-31.1] mm2; P = .0001), with superior transmurality (89.1% vs 69.6%; P = .04) compared to PC ablation. vHPSD ablation produced significantly larger RV lesions in length (7.7 [7.0-8.7] mm vs 6.0 [4.8-6.9] mm; P <.0001), width (6.4 [5.4-7.5] mm vs 4.3 [3.6-5.2] mm; P <.0001), and area (39.4 [29.1-50.1] mm2 vs 19.9 [14.7-25.2] mm2; P <.0001) but similar volume (P = .97) with shallower lesions (2.7 [2.2-3.4] mm vs 3.8 [3.0-4.4] mm; P <.0001). Atrial linear lesions were more homogeneous (P = .02), with fewer gaps in each line (P = .003) with vHPSD ablation. LV focal lesions (15 TFC mode; 21 PC mode) were similar in volume and depth, but lesion size showed less deviation (P <.05) in TFC than PC mode. Fewer steam pops were observed in TFC mode (0% vs 28.6%; P = .03). Hemorrhagic rings around the lesion core were generally smaller with TFC/vHPSD ablation (P <.05). TFC/vHPSD ablation produces larger, shallower, more homogeneous, and less hemorrhagic lesions. vHPSD Ablation produces more transmural and contiguous linear lesions compared to PC ablation. LV lesions are more homogeneous with fewer steam pops in TFC ablation.

PCV12 Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Using Thermocool Smarttouch with or without Ablation INDEX (AI) Guided Versus the 2ND-Generation Cryoballoon for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation in China: A Cost- Effectiveness Analysis

PCV12 Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Using Thermocool Smarttouch with or without Ablation INDEX (AI) Guided Versus the 2ND-Generation Cryoballoon for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation in China: A Cost- Effectiveness Analysis

Real-world outcomes comparison among adults with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation with a contact force porous tip catheter versus a second-generation cryoballoon catheter: a retrospective analysis of multihospital US database

ObjectiveTo compare real-world clinical and economic outcomes among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing cardiac ablation with the contact force-sensing porous tip THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH SF (STSF) catheter versus the Arctic Front...

Contact-force recovery predicts the absence of cardiac perforation during steam pops.

Cardiac perforation (CP) is an uncommon but clinically important complication of radiofrequency ablation (RFA). We previously showed that contact-force recovery after a steam pop predicts the absence of CP in an open-chest animal model after pericardial dissection. We attempted to determine whether this also applies when pericardium is present. In 5 open-chest sheep, left atrial RFA was performed under direct observation with a 7.5F ThermoCool SmartTouch force-sensing catheter (Biosense Webster Inc., Irvine, CA, USA). The catheter's contact force was measured every 50ms during RFA. After each steam pop, the presence (+) or absence (-) of CP was noted, as well as whether pericardium was present over the ablation site. Contact-force signals were analyzed to detect contact-force recovery. Perforation rates were compared between sites with or without pericardium. Ninety-six steam pops occurred: 77 with pericardium and 19 without. For the pericardial steam pops, contact-force recovery occurred in 31/60 CP- events (52%) and 1/17 CP+ events (6%; P = 0.0006). For nonpericardial steam pops, contact-force recovery occurred in 4/9 CP- events (44%) and 1/10 CP+ events (P = 0.14). The rate of CP was 22% with pericardium and 52% without (P = 0.02). Pericardial tissue charred extensively during steam pop induction, even in the absence of CP. Contact-force recovery predicts the absence of CP during RFA independently of whether the pericardium is present. The presence of the pericardium may decrease the likelihood of perforation, perhaps by acting as a thermal sink. Additional studies are needed to correlate these results with clinical experience.

Impact of catheter-tissue contact force on lesion size during right ventricular outflow tract ablation in a swine model.

BackgroundThe catheter-tissue contact force (CF) is one of the significant determinants of lesion size and thus has a considerable impact on the effectiveness of ablation procedures. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of CF on the lesion size during right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) ablation in a swine model.MethodsTwelve Guangxi Bama miniature male pigs weighing 40 to 50 kg were studied. After general anesthesia, a ThermoCool SmartTouch contact-sensing ablation catheter was introduced to the RVOT via the femoral vein under the guidance of the CARTO 3 system. The local ventricular voltage amplitude and impedance were measured using different CF levels. We randomly divided the animals into the following four groups according to the different CF levels: group A (3–9 g); group B (10–19 g); group C (20–29 g); and group D (30–39 g). Radiofrequency ablations were performed at three points in the free wall and septum of the RVOT in power control mode at 30 W for 30 s while maintaining the saline irrigation rate at 17 mL/min. At the end of the procedures, the maximum depth, surface diameter, and lesion volume were measured and recorded. A linear regression analysis was performed to determine the relationship between continuous variables.ResultsA total of 72 ablation lesions were created in the RVOT of the 12 Bama pigs. The maximum depth, surface diameter, and volume of the lesions measured were well correlated with the CF (free wall: β = 0.105, β = 0.162, β = 3.355, respectively, P < 0.001; septum: β = 0.093, β = 0.150, β = 3.712, respectively, P < 0.001). The regional ventricular bipolar voltage amplitude, unipolar voltage amplitude, and impedance were weakly positively associated with the CF (β = 0.065, β = 0.125, and β = 1.054, respectively, P < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the incidence of steam pops among groups A, B, C, and D (free wall: F = 7.3, P = 0.032; septum: F = 10.5, P = 0.009); and steam pops occurred only when the CF exceeded 20 g. Trans-mural lesions were observed when the CF exceeded 10 g in the free wall, while the lesions in the septum were non-trans-mural even though the CF reached 30 g.ConclusionsCF seems to be a leading predictive factor for the size of formed lesions in RVOT ablation. Maintaining the CF value between 3 and 10 g may be reasonable and effective for creating the necessary lesion size and reducing the risk of complications, such as steam pops and perforations.

Contact force sensing in ablation of ventricular arrhythmias using a 56-hole open-irrigation catheter: a propensity-matched analysis

PurposeThe effect of adding contact force (CF) sensing to 56-hole tip irrigation in ventricular arrhythmia (VA) ablation has not been previously studied. We aimed to compare outcomes with and without CF sensing in VA ablation using a 56-hole radiofrequency (RF) catheter.MethodsA total of 164 patients who underwent first-time VA ablation using Thermocool SmartTouch Surround Flow (TC-STSF) catheter (Biosense-Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA) were propensity-matched in a 1:1 fashion to 164 patients who had first-time ablation using Thermocool Surround Flow (TC-SF) catheter. Patients were matched for age, gender, cardiac aetiology, ejection fraction and approach. Acute success, complications and long-term follow-up were compared.ResultsThere was no difference between procedures utilising either TC-SF or TC-STSF in acute success (TC-SF: 134/164 (82%), TC-STSF: 141/164 (86%), p = 0.3), complications (TC-SF: 11/164 (6.7%), TC-STSF: 11/164 (6.7%), p = 1.0) or VA-free survival (TC-SF: mean arrhythmia-free survival time = 5.9 years, 95% CI = 5.4–6.4, TC-STSF: mean = 3.2 years, 95% CI = 3–3.5, log-rank p = 0.74). Fluoroscopy time was longer in normal hearts with TC-SF (19 min, IQR: 14–30) than TC-STSF (14 min, IQR: 8–25; p = 0.04).ConclusionBoth TC-SF and TC-STSF catheters are safe and effective in treating VAs. The use of CF sensing catheters did not improve safety or acute and long-term outcomes, but reduced fluoroscopy time in normal heart VA.

Real-world safety of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with contact force or cryoballoon ablation

PurposeReal-world data can help medical administrators, physicians, and payers make evidence-based decisions regarding treatment choices. The objective of this study was to compare real-world safety outcomes with the latest catheter technologies used for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF).MethodsThe Vizient Health Systems database, a large US hospital database, was used to compare acute complications in AF ablation with the contact force sensing THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH® Catheter or the THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH® SF Catheter (ST) versus the second-generation Arctic Front Advance™ Cryoablation Catheter (CB2) between September 2015 and June 2017. The primary outcome was a composite safety endpoint of acute ablation-related complications defined via ICD-10 diagnosis and procedure codes, including tamponade and other pericardial events, respiratory complications, stroke, cerebral or pre-cerebral occlusion/stenosis without infarction, vascular access complications, hemorrhage, phrenic nerve injury, myocardial infarction, and pulmonary embolism.ResultsIn total, 1473 ablations met all inclusion criteria (407 ST, 1066 CB2). Ablations for paroxysmal AF (PAF) had a lower complication rate than ablations for persistent AF (PsAF) (6.1% vs. 7.3%), as did ablations with ST compared with CB2 within each AF type (PAF 6.0% vs. 6.1%, PsAF 6.3% vs. 7.8%). Neither ablation catheter nor AF type was statistically significant after controlling for site volume, patient age, and comorbid conditions (ST vs. CB2: OR 0.86, p = 0.5544; PsAF vs. PAF: OR 1.08, p = 0.7376).ConclusionAcute ablation-related complication rates were low and were not significantly associated with catheter technology. Increased risk of complication was attributable to low-volume sites and baseline patient characteristics.

PCV20 RADIOFREQUENCY CATHETER ABLATION VERSUS THE 2ND-GENERATION CRYOBALLOON FOR THE TREATMENT OF PAROXYSMAL ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN CHINA: A COST- EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS

Both the contact-force catheter (Thermocool SmartTouch®) and the 2nd-generation cryoballoon (the 2nd-CB) have become a revolutionary enhancement on the previous technology, for the better contact-force sensitivity or the broader segmental electrical isolation of pulmonary veins. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA )using contact-force catheter (Thermocool SmartTouch®) versus the 2nd-CBA in PAF patients from third-party payer's perspective in China.

Üç Boyutlu Elektroanatomik Haritalama Sistemi İle Sağ Atriyal Apendiks Taşikardisinin Ablasyonu: Nadir Bir Vaka

Atrial tachycardias (AT) originating from right atrial appendage (RAA) are quite rare among focal atrial tachycardias. A 38-year-old female patient presented to the emergency room complaining of palpitations and dizziness. Electrocardiography (ECG) showed regular narrow QRS complex tachycardia with a ventricular rate of 150 bpm. The patient had frequent episodes of palpitations for 5 years. Considering the ensuing tachycardiomyopathy under medical treatment, electrophysiological study (EPS) and ablation procedure was planned after having informed consent. During isoproterenol infusion (1-4 mcg/min), a sustained tachycardia with narrow QRS complex was induced. Diagnostic electrophysiological findings were consistent with AT. During tachycardia, by using a three-dimensional (3D) electroanatomic mapping system, simultaneous anatomical and activation mapping was performed with a quadripolar 3.5mm cooled-tip Thermocool Smarttouch bi-directional navigation catheter. Activation mapping demonstrated that the earliest endocardial activation site was basal portion of the RAA where the local electrogram was 104 msn prior to the Cs reference signal during tachycardia which is spreading in a centrifugal fashion. Impedance-controlled radiofrequency ablation (RF) ablation (35 W, 42° C, 5-10 g of contact force) was performed at the earliest site and tachycardia terminated in 10 seconds. No AT observed during the waiting period of 30 min after RF ablation.

Safety and efficacy of the ThermoCool SmartTouch SurroundFlow catheter for atrial fibrillation ablation: A meta-analysis.

BackgroundThe ThermoCool Smarttouch Surroundflow catheter (STSFc) is an advanced catheter, which integrating contact force sensing and surroundflow technology. However, comparative data between STSFc and contact force sensing catheter (Thermocool SmartTouch catheter [STc]) are limited.HypothesisWe thought that STSFc might bring more clinical benefits. The aim of this meta‐analysis was to compare the safety and efficiency between the STSFc and the STc for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF).MethodsThe Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies comparing STSFc and STc.ResultsFour trials involving 727 patients were included in the study. Pool‐analyses demonstrated that, as compared STc ablation, STSFc ablation was more beneficial in terms of procedural times (standard mean difference [SMD]: −0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.37 to −0.07, P = .005) and irrigation fluid volume (SMD: −1.94; 95% CI, −2.65 to −1.22, P < .0001). There was no significant difference between STSFc and STc (risk ratio [RR]: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.21, P = .79) for free from AF. Evidence of complications were low and similar for both groups (RR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.19‐3.55, P = .80). Additionally, patients administered STSFc ablation tended to have shorter fluoroscopic times (SMD: −0.20; 95% CI, −0.63‐0.23, P = .21).ConclusionsSTSFc ablation was associated with reducing procedural times and irrigation fluid volume. Further, STSFc ablation tended to shorten fluoroscopic times. Therefore, STSFc ablation would be a better choice for AF patients especially in patients with heart failure.

The industrialization of ablation: a highly standardized and reproducible workflow for radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation

Background or PurposeThe purpose of this analysis was to report on efficacy of a standardized workflow for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation using technology advances such as 3D imaging and contact force sensing in a real-world setting.MethodsConsecutive AF ablations from 2014 to 2015 at a high-volume site in Belgium were included. The workflow consisted of a pre-specified procedure sequence including 3D modeling followed by radiofrequency encircling of the pulmonary veins (25 W posterior wall, 35 W anterior wall) with a THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH® Catheter guided by CARTO VISITAG™ Module (2.5 mm/5 s stability, 50% > 7 g) and ablation index (targets: 550 anterior wall, 400 posterior wall). Efficiency endpoints were procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and radiation dose. The primary effectiveness endpoint was freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence.ResultsA total of 605 paroxysmal AF (PAF) and 182 persistent AF (PsAF) patients were followed for 436 ± 199 days. Mean procedure times were short (PAF: 96.1 ± 26.2 min; PsAF: 109.2 ± 35.6 min) with most procedures (90.6% PAF; 81.3% PsAF) completed in ≤ 120 min. Minimal fluoroscopy was utilized (PAF: 6.1 ± 3.8 min, 5.9 ± 3.4 Gy*cm2; PsAF: 6.9 ± 4.7 min, 7.4 ± 4.9 Gy*cm2). Freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence was higher for PAF than PsAF patients (OR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.4–2.9, p = 0.0003), but adjusted mean rates were high in both groups (81.0% vs. 67.9%). Rates were adjusted for prior ablation and age (at 65 years).ConclusionAF ablation using a standardized workflow resulted in low procedure times and variability, with minimal fluoroscopy exposure. Long-term freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence was high in both PAF and PsAF populations.

P2842Sequential application of horizontal and vertical orientation on radiofrequency ablation lesions produced by thermocool smarttouch SF catheter

Abstract Background Ablation lesions represent a complex interaction between the ablation catheter configuration and tissue anatomy. An understanding of each variable can assist in determination of the optimal lesion set. One such variable is the catheter orientation. With an irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter with 6 pores (6P) near the distal tip, lesion surface area and volumes are smaller in the horizontal catheter orientation compared to the vertical catheter orientation. This finding is explained by the 6P irrigation catheter design, where irrigation fluid is discharged from six ports around the circumference of the electrode. Introduced in 2015, the ThermoCool SmartTouch® SF catheter has a 56-pore (56P) distribution to provide high density low volume irrigation settings. Irrigation catheters create smaller lesions in horizontal orientation compared to vertical orientation, however this has not been studied for the 56P irrigated catheter. Purpose Evaluate the impact of catheter orientation with sequential application of 56P catheter. Methods Ablation lesions were created on additive-free chicken model in a saline bath heated to 37°C using the 56P catheter under standard flow rate (8cc/min) conditions. Ablation energy of 20W and 30W was delivered twice for 30 seconds with 3 minutes interval between applications. Contact force (CF) of 5, 10, 15, and 20g was applied with the following conditions: horizontal catheter orientation followed by horizontal (HH), vertical by vertical (VV), horizontal by vertical (HV), and vertical by horizontal catheter orientation (VH). Measurements were obtained by lesion dissection through the midpoint by 3 independent operators. Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparison of lesion depth, surface area and volume. Results Ninety-six lesions were analyzed. No coagulum or steam pops were included in the analysis. The minimum and maximum lesion depth, surface area and volume were 1.5 &amp; 6.0 mm, 14.1 &amp; 117.7mm2, 47.1 &amp; 471.0 mm3 respectively. There was no significant difference in the lesion depth, surface area or volume in HH, VV, HV or VH orientation at different CF with 20W and 30W. (Fig 1) Figure 1 Conclusion Unlike other irrigated catheters, catheter orientation with sequential application with different CF and power did not impact lesion depth, surface area and volume with 56P catheter. This finding could be considered useful in situations where the catheter orientation could be challenging owing to tissue anatomy to achieve adequate lesion size. Acknowledgement/Funding UVA Health System

Safety and Long-Term Success of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH® Catheter: Real-World Experience.

To investigate the real-world clinical experience of persistent atrial fibrillation (persAF) ablation using the THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH® catheter with contact force (CF)-sensing ability in a prospective, multicenter registry. Patients with persAF (excluding long-standing persAF) undergoing ablation were enrolled. Primary adverse events (AEs), 12-month success, quality of life (QoL), and correlation of success with CF were assessed. Overall, 150 patients with persAF (age 61.6 ± 9.4 years; 76.0% male; 90.7% Caucasian; left ventricular ejection fraction 56.9% ± 10.3%; left atrial diameter 41.5 ± 7.9 mm) underwent catheter insertion (safety cohort); 142 met eligibility criteria and were ablated (evaluable cohort). Confirmation of entrance block for all targeted pulmonary veins was achieved in 99.3% of patients. The primary AE rate was 4.0% (6/150), and 12-month success was 63.1% (95% confidence interval: 54.2%-71.4%). A non-significant trend towards higher success was observed in patients with isoproterenol/adenosine challenge vs. those without (73.1% vs. 60.2%, respectively; P=0.065). Investigators stayed within their pre-selected CF working range (catheter-tissue contact stability) 79.7% ± 12.7% of the time. When investigators stayed within the CF range ≥80% vs. <80% of the time, ablation success was 69.2% vs. 58.5%, respectively (P=0.285). QoL improved significantly at 6 months and was sustained through the 12-month follow-up (P<0.0001). Symptom control in a real-world setting of persAF ablation using the THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH® catheter was 63.1%, with significant improvements in QoL, and trended non-significantly towards increased success in patients receiving isoproterenol/adenosine challenge and when investigators stayed within their pre-selected CF range ≥80% of the time.

Atrial fibrillation ablation with a spring sensor-irrigated contact force-sensing catheter compared with other ablation catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analysis

ObjectivesThe objective of our review was to systematically assess available evidence on the effectiveness, safety and efficiency of a spring sensor-irrigated contact force (CF) catheter (THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH Catheter (ST)) for...

PCV39 RADIOFREQUENCY CATHETER ABLATION WITH WARFARIN VERSUS ANTIARRHYTHMIC DRUGS WITH NEW ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS FOR THE TREATMENT OF PAROXYSMAL ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN CHINA: A COST- EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) using contact-force catheter (Thermocool SmartTouch®) + warfarin versus antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) + new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) patients from third-party payer's perspective in China. A two-part model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of these two treatments. The short-term part was a decision-tree (1 year) including surgery-related complications and drug toxicity. The long-term was a Markov chain (lifetime) including the health states of normal sinus rhythms, AF recurrence, heart failure, stroke, post stroke, intracranial hemorrhages (ICH), post ICH, myocardial Infarction (MI), post MI, gastrointestinal bleeding and dead. Clinical efficacy, utility and cost data were obtained from published literature. The model calculated quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and total costs per patient. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Captured by lifetime Markov model plus 1-year decision tree model, the total costs per patient for RFCA vs. AAD groups were ¥107,497 vs. ¥149,764; QALYs 8.16 vs. 7.58. From the 7th year, RFCA + warfarin became cost-effective (the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios at 7th year was ¥98,579/QALY, lower than the recommended threshold, 3xGDP/capita in China, ¥178,980). Furthermore, RFCA became cost-saving from the 9th year till lifetime with better effectiveness and lower overall costs compared with AAD. Both one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Compared with AAD + NOAC, RFCA using contact force catheter + warfarin is cost-saving in long term for the treatment of PAF in China.

Low-fluoroscopy atrial fibrillation ablation with contact force and ultrasound technologies: a learning curve.

BackgroundFluoroscopy exposure during catheter ablation is a health hazard to patients and operators. This study presents the results of implementing a low-fluoroscopy workflow using modern contact force (CF) technologies in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) ablation.MethodsA fluoroscopy reduction workflow was implemented and subsequent catheter ablations for PAF were evaluated. After vascular access with ultrasound guidance, a THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH® Catheter (ST) was advanced into the right atrium. The decapolar catheter was placed without fluoroscopy. A double-transseptal puncture was performed under intracardiac echocardiography guidance. ST and mapping catheters were advanced into the left atrium. A left atrial map was created, and pulmonary vein (PV) isolation was confirmed via entrance and exit block before and after the administration of isoproterenol or adenosine.ResultsForty-three patients underwent PAF ablation with fluoroscopy reduction workflow (mean age: 66±9 years; 70% male), performed by five operators. Acute success rate (PV isolation) was 96.5% of PVs. One case of pericardial effusion, not requiring intervention, was the only acute complication. Mean procedure time was 217±42 minutes. Mean fluoroscopy time was 2.3±3.0 minutes, with 97.7% of patients having < 10 minutes and 86.0% having < 5 minutes. A significant downward trend over time was observed, suggesting a rapid learning curve for fluoroscopy reduction. Freedom from any atrial arrhythmias without reablation was 80.0% after a mean follow-up of 12±3 months.ConclusionLow fluoroscopy time is achievable with CF technologies after a short learning curve, without compromising patient safety or effectiveness.

A Pilot Study on Parameter Setting of VisiTag™ Module during Pulmonary Vein Isolation.

Objectives To identify optimal predefined criteria (OPC) for filters of the VisiTag™ module in the CARTO 3 system during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Methods Thirty patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who experienced PVI first were enrolled. PVI was accomplished by using a Thermocool SmartTouch catheter. Ablation lesions were tagged automatically as soon as predefined criteria of the VisiTag™ module were met. OPC should be that ablation with the setting resulting in the conduction gap (CG) as few as possible, while contiguous encircling ablation line (CEAL) without the tag gap (TG) on the 3D anatomic model as much as possible. Result(s) When ablation with parameter setting is being catheter movement with a 3 mm distance limit for at least 20 s and force over time (FOT) being off, there were 60 CEAL without TG on the 3D anatomic model. However, 26 CGs were found. After changing FOT setting to be a minimal force of 5 g with 50% stability time, 22 TGs were displayed. Of them, 20 TGs were accompanied by CGs. On reablation at sites of TG with changed parameter setting, 18 CGs were eliminated when 20 TGs disappeared. When reablation with FOT is being a minimal force of 10 g with 50% stability time, 6 remaining CGs were eliminated. However, there was no CEAL. With a mean of follow-up 10.93 months, 2 patients with persistent AF suffered AF recurrence. Conclusion A 3 mm distance limit for at least 20 s and FOT being a minimal force of 5 g with 50% stability time might be OPC for the VisiTag™ module.

The best of two worlds? Pulmonary vein isolation using a novel radiofrequency ablation catheter incorporating contact force sensing technology and 56-hole porous tip irrigation.

This study aimed to evaluate feasibility and safety as well as 1-year clinical outcome of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using a unique radiofrequency ablation catheter ("Thermocool SmartTouch SurroundFlow"; STSF) incorporating both, contact force (CF) sensing technology and enhanced tip irrigation with 56 holes, in one device. A total of 110 patients suffering from drug-refractory atrial fibrillation underwent wide area circumferential PVI using either the STSF ablation catheter (75 consecutive patients, study group) or a CF catheter with conventional tip irrigation ("Thermocool SmartTouch", 35 consecutive patients, control group). For each ablation lesion, a target CF of ≥ 10-39g and a force time integral (FTI) of > 400 gs was targeted. Acute PVI was achieved in all patients with target CF obtained in > 85% of ablation points when using either device. Mean procedure time (131.3 ± 33.7min in the study group vs. 133.0 ± 42.0min in the control group; p = 0.99), mean fluoroscopy time (14.0 ± 6 vs. 13.5 ± 6.6min; p = 0.56) and total ablation time were not significantly different (1751.0 ± 394.0 vs. 1604.6 ± 287.8s; p = 0.2). However, there was a marked reduction in total irrigation fluid delivery by 51.7% (265.52 ± 64.4 vs. 539.6 ± 118.2ml; p < 0.01). The Kaplan-Meier estimate 12-month arrhythmia-free survival after the index procedure following a 3-month blanking period was 79.9% (95% CI 70.4%, 90.4%) for the study group and 66.7% for the control group (95% CI 50.2%, 88.5%). This finding did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.18). Major complications occurred in 2/75 patients (2.7%; one pericardial tamponade and one transient ischemic attack) in the study group and no patient in the control group (p = 18). PVI using the STSF catheter is safe and effective and results in beneficial 1-year clinical outcome. The improved tip irrigation leads to a significant reduction in procedural fluid burden.

P835The force awakens: one year clinical outcome after pulmonary vein isolation using the novel ThermoCool SmartTouch Surround Flow catheter

P835The force awakens: one year clinical outcome after pulmonary vein isolation using the novel ThermoCool SmartTouch Surround Flow catheter