Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a heterogeneous group of tumors with diverse clinical and molecular characteristics, characterized by limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as promising therapies for STS, yet comprehensive evaluations of their efficacy, especially in combination with other treatments, are scarce. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials on ICIs in STS treatment, sourced from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to May 31, 2024. The studies included both monotherapy and combination therapies with ICIs. We assessed the methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies. Data synthesis involved random-effects meta-analysis to determine pooled proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for objective response rates (ORR), disease control rates (DCR), and high-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). The analysis included 38 studies with 1349 patients covering 24 STS subtypes. The overall ORR was 16% (95% CI 0.12-0.21), DCR was 64% (95% CI 0.57-0.70), and the rate of Grade 3-5 TRAEs was 19% (95% CI 0.13-0.27). Treatments combining ICIs with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) showed the highest efficacy (ORR 28%, 95% CI 0.18-0.40), albeit with increased adverse events. ORRs in first-line treatments were substantially higher (28%) compared to second-line treatments or beyond (11%). Subtypes like alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS), angiosarcoma (AS), and epithelioid sarcoma (ES) exhibited favorable responses exceeding 30%. This systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that ICIs, particularly when combined with TKIs, provide substantial therapeutic benefits in treating STS, significantly enhancing response rates in specific subtypes such as ASPS and AS. The results underscore the transformative potential of ICIs in STS treatment strategies. However, the variability across subtypes and treatment lines emphasizes the need for further randomized controlled trials to refine and personalize therapeutic approaches, ensuring optimal outcomes for patients with these diverse malignancies.
Read full abstract