Therapy For Stroke Prevention Research Articles

Abstract 9424: Single versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Stroke Prevention Following Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Patients With High Bleeding Risk

Introduction: The optimal antiplatelet therapy following Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in atrial fibrillation patients who are not candidates for long-term oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC) is subject to debate. Hypothesis: Is single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) safe and effective when compared to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with high bleeding risk? Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search for all studies that compared the use of SAPT with DAPT following LAAO for patients in whom OAC is deemed highly risky or contraindicated. The outcomes of our study were device-related thrombosis (DRT), stroke and systemic embolization (SSE), and major bleeding (MB). The risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are presented as summary statistics and were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: A total of 15 observational studies with 3231 patients (SAPT, n=1036; DAPT, n=2195; 64.5% men; median follow-up duration 12 months; mean age 74.7±8.5 years; CHA2DS2-VASc score 4.3±1.6; HASBLED score 3.2±1.2) were included. For DRT, data were available from 10 studies (2910 patients); there was no difference between SAPT and DAPT groups (2.6% vs. 2.3%; RR: 1.41; 95%CI: 0.77-2.59; P=0.26; I 2 :0%). For SSE (8 studies, 959 patients); although numerically more events were observed in the SAPT group, there was no statistical difference between the two groups in the pooled analysis (2.9% vs. 1.5%; RR: 5.43; 95%CI: 0.74-39.81; P=0.1; I 2 :78%). Finally, for MB (8 studies, 1818 patients); although numerically more events were observed in the DAPT group, there was no statistical difference between the two arms (2.3% vs. 3.2%; RR: 1.90; 95%CI: 0.46-7.87; P=0.37; I 2 :72%). Conclusions: Our study showed comparable safety and efficacy profiles for SAPT and DAPT after LAAO. Adequately powered randomized studies determining the optimal antithrombotic therapy in the first weeks after LAAO are warranted in patients at high risk for bleeding.

Anticoagulation Control in Different Ethnic Groups Receiving Vitamin K Antagonist for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation.

Vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin reduces the risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Since warfarin has a narrow therapeutic index, its administration needs to be regularly monitored to avoid any adverse clinical outcomes such as stroke and bleeding. The quality of anticoagulation control with warfarin therapy can be measured by using time in therapeutic range (TTR). This review focuses on the prevalence of AF, quality of anticoagulation control (TTR) and adverse clinical outcome in AF patients within different ethnic groups receiving warfarin therapy for stroke prevention. A literature search was conducted in Embase and PubMed using keywords of “prevalence,” “atrial fibrillation,” “stroke prevention,” “oral anticoagulants,” “warfarin,” “ethnicities,” “race” “time in therapeutic range,” “adverse clinical outcome,” “stroke, bleeding.” Articles published by 1st February 2020 were included. Forty-one studies were included in the final review consisting of AF prevalence (n = 14 studies), time in therapeutic range (n = 18 studies), adverse clinical outcome (n = 9 studies) within different ethnic groups. Findings indicate that higher prevalence of AF but better anticoagulation control among the Whites as compared to other ethnicities. Of note, non-whites had higher risk of strokes and bleeding outcomes while on warfarin therapy. Addressing disparities in prevention and healthcare resource allocation could potentially improve AF-related outcomes in minorities.

Abstract 9414: Utilization of Antithrombotic Therapies in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Across the Spectrum of Stroke Risk

Introduction: OAC are recommended for AF patients with CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc ≥2 in men or ≥3 in women (high-risk group), may be considered in patients with CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc 1 in men or 2 in women (medium-risk group), and are reasonable to omit in patients with CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc 0 in men or 1 in women (low-risk group). Furthermore, NOACs are recommended over warfarin in most AF patients. This study aimed to investigate AF stroke prevention treatment patterns in patients managed in routine practice, in particular, the under-use of OAC in the high-risk group and over-use in the low-risk group. Methods: Adult patients with AF were identified using de-identified claims for commercial and Medicare Advantage enrollees in the OptumLabs Data Warehouse. Prescription fills were assessed within 90 days of a patient’s AF encounter between 1/1/2016-12/31/2020. Patients with other indications for OAC, such as VTE, recent joint replacement, prior mechanical or bioprosthetic valve replacement, rheumatic mitral stenosis, and patients who underwent LAAO were excluded. Results: Among the 339,197 AF patients, 4.4%, 8.0%, and 87.6% were in the low-, medium-, and high-risk groups, respectively. The mean age was 51.2 ±10.5 yr, 59.9 ±9.4 yr, and 75.1 ±8.8 yr. In the low-risk group, 29.6% were treated with OAC, whereas in the high-risk group, 40.3% were not treated with any antithrombotic therapy and 7.5% used thienopyridine only. Although 71% of patients on OAC were on a NOAC, the proportion of patients on NOAC decreased from 91% in the low-risk group to 69% in the high-risk group. Conclusions: There are potentially both under-use of guideline-recommended stroke prevention therapies in the high-risk patients and over-use in the low-risk group. Because patients at a high risk of stroke are also at a high risk of major and intracranial bleeding who might benefit from NOACs, the decreased use of NOAC in high-risk patients might highlight the need for future quality improvement efforts.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Ischemic Stroke Prevention: Which Two Could Be Better than One?

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Ischemic Stroke Prevention: Which Two Could Be Better than One?

Traditional Dietary Therapy for Prevention and Management of Hypertension and Stroke in Africa. What Next?

Hypertension and Stroke are non-communicable diseases that have affected millions of people globally. In Africa, the prevalence of these diseases has increased tremendously. Globally, stroke is the second leading cause of death and in SubSaharan Africa its mortality rate has increased. Poor management and poor access to health care of stroke patients is also a reason for the high mortality rate. About 70% and 40% fatal rate a case in Mozambique and Ghana has been attributed to poor management of stroke. The prevalence of stroke in Sub- Saharan Africa has been estimated to be 14 per 1000 population and a monthly fatality rate of about 40%. Hypertension is one of the comorbidities of cardiovascular disease, stroke, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia and heart failure

P.065 Physician Approaches to Anti-thrombotic Therapies for Acutely Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: Insights from the Hot Carotid Qualitative Study

Background: Whereas the beneficial effect of antiplatelet therapy for recurrent stroke prevention is well-established, uncertainties remain regarding the optimal anti-thrombotic regimen for acutely symptomatic carotid stenosis (“hot carotid”), particularly as patients await revascularization. We sought to explore the approaches of stroke physicians to peri-procedural anti-thrombotic management of patients with “hot carotids”. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews regarding “hot carotid” management with purposive sampling of 20 stroke physicians from 14 centres in North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. We identified key themes using conventional qualitative content analysis. Results: Important themes revealed from our discussion included limitations of existing clinical trial evidence, competing surgeon versus neurologist/internist preferences, and single vs dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) while awaiting revascularization. Areas of uncertainty included the management of stroke while on aspirin, implications of non-stenotic features of carotid disease (intraluminal thrombus, plaque morphology), the role of newer anti-platelet agents or anticoagulants, platelet aggregation testing, and how soon to start DAPT. Conclusions: Our qualitative analysis revealed themes that were important to stakeholders in stroke care. Teams designing international trials will have to accommodate identified variations in anti-thrombotic practice patterns and take into consideration areas of uncertainty, such as newer anti-thrombotic agents, and the implication of non-stenotic features of carotid disease.

Antithrombotic Therapy for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Ischemic Stroke With Aspirin Treatment Failure.

Many older patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke were already taking aspirin before admission. However, the management strategy for patients with aspirin treatment failure has not been fully established. We used data from the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines Stroke Registry to describe discharge antithrombotic treatment patterns among Medicare beneficiaries with ischemic stroke who were taking aspirin before their stroke and were discharged alive from 1734 hospitals in the United States between October 2012 and December 2017. Of 261 634 ischemic stroke survivors, 100 016 (38.2%) were taking aspirin monotherapy before stroke. Among them, 44.4% of patients remained on aspirin monotherapy at discharge (20.9% 81 mg, 18.2% 325 mg, 5.3% other or unknown dose). The next most common therapy choice was dual antiplatelet therapy (24.6%), followed by clopidogrel monotherapy (17.8%). The remaining 13.2% of patients were discharged on either aspirin/dipyridamole, warfarin, or nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants with or without antiplatelet, or no antithrombotic therapy at all. Nearly half of patients with ischemic stroke while on preventive therapy with aspirin are discharged on aspirin monotherapy without changing antithrombotic class, while the other half are discharged on clopidogrel monotherapy, dual antiplatelet therapy, or other less common agents. These findings emphasize the need for future research to identify best management strategies for this very common and complex clinical scenario.

Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection.

Cervical artery dissection (CAD) is rare, yet it is a common cause of stroke in young and middle-aged adults. Historically, some senior clinicians favored anticoagulation in the prevention of stroke due to CAD. Choosing the optimal antithrombotic treatment with either antiplatelet (AP) or anticoagulant (AC) medications remains a challenge. This paper will review the clinical features and imaging of CAD, and the acute treatment and prevention of stroke due to CAD. Until 2015, there were no prospective randomized trials in the optimal antithrombotic management of CAD. The Cervical Artery Dissection in Stroke Study (CADISS) trial found that treatment with AC did not lower the risk of subsequent stroke or death at 3months when compared to AP agents. This led to a paradigm shift in national guidelines. In 2021, The Biomarkers and Antithrombotic Treatment in of Cervical Artery Dissection (TREAT-CAD) trial however did not confirm the non-inferiority of AP therapy in stroke prevention due to CAD. The optimal antithrombotic management for stroke prevention in CAD remains uncertain, while the superiority of anticoagulation has not been established, nor has the non-inferiority of AP agents. The future direction of research should consider early preventative treatment, dual treatment with AP agents, direct oral AC medications, and aggregation of data from existing randomized trials.

Antiplatelet therapy in stroke prevention after non-cardioembolic transient ischemic attack

The review shows modern concepts on the role of antiplatelet therapy in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in patients after non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). We present an analytical characteristic of all antiplatelet agents that have been studied in randomized controlled trials worldwide. We demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages of each agent in monotherapy and in combination. New ideas about the rationality of the use of combined antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and acetylsalicylic acid in the first 24 hours and no more than 90 days in patients with minor ischemic stroke or TIA are discussed. The efficacy and safety of new antiplatelet agents are analyzed. The basic principles of choosing antiplatelet agents in patients after ischemic noncardioembolic stroke/TIA are outlined.

Anticoagulant therapy for stroke prevention in patients with severe COVID-19

During the pandemic of the new coronavirus infection, there is increasing evidence of neurological complications associated with COVID-19. There is no doubt that stroke can be a major complication in patients with severe disease course.Objective: to determine the safest and most effective anticoagulant for stroke prevention in patients with severe COVID-19.Patients and methods. A prospective study enrolled 520 patients with severe COVID-19. We used the following criteria for severe COVID-19: SpO2 <92% on room air at sea level, PaO2 /FiO2 <300 mm Hg, respiratory rate >30 breaths/min, lung infiltrates >50% on computed tomography. The study included 509 patients, divided into three groups depending on the type of anticoagulant therapy: patients of the 1st group received 24–36 thousand IU of heparin, patients of the 2nd group – enoxaparin at a dose of 1 mg/kg per day, patients of the 3rd group – rivaroxaban at a dose of 20 mg/day. The duration of anticoagulant administration depended on the severity of the patient's condition, dynamics of laboratory parameters (D-dimer, fibrinogen, international normalized ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time, platelet count), and varied from 2 to 6 weeks. In addition, we studied the incidence of ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes and transient ischemic attacks during a 6-week follow-up period. The article also presents a clinical case of large artery thrombosis in a young patient with severe COVID-19 without stroke risk factors.Results and discussion. Even against the background of active primary prevention, stroke incidence was 2.6% (0.6% for ischemic stroke, 1.4% for venous stroke, and 0.6% for hemorrhagic stroke). The highest stroke incidence was observed in the group of patients receiving heparin. In contrast, the prevention of thrombotic complications in patients receiving low-molecular-weight anticoagulants or rivaroxaban showed the best results with minimal morbidity and mortality in severe COVID-19.Conclusion. Stroke can be a complication of COVID-19, and preventive anticoagulant therapy using low-molecular-weight heparin or a factor X inhibitor effectively prevents this complication.

Why Did All Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and High Risk of Stroke Not Receive Oral Anticoagulants? Results of the Polish Atrial Fibrillation (POL-AF) Registry.

Background: Most atrial fibrillation (AF) patients are at high risk of thromboembolic, and the use of oral anticoagulants (OACs) is advised in such cases. The aim of the study was to evaluate the frequency at which OACs were used in patients with AF and high risk thromboembolic complications, and identify factors that result in OACs not being used in the researched group of patients. Methods: The prospective, multicenter and non-interventional POL-AF registry is a study that includes AF patients from ten Polish cardiology centers. They were consecutively hospitalized between January and December of 2019. All the patients in the study were of high stroke risk. Results: A total of 3614 patients with AF and high stroke risk were included. Among the total study population, 91.5% received OAC therapy; antiplatelet therapy was prescribed for 3.7% of patients, heparin for 2.7%, and 2.1% of patients did not receive any stroke prevention therapy. Independent predictors of no OAC prescription were intracranial bleeding (OR 0.15, 95%CI 0.07–0.35, p < 0.001), gastrointestinal bleeding (OR 0.25, 95%CI 0.17–0.37, p < 0.001), cancer (OR 0.37, 95%CI 0.25–0.55, p < 0.001), hospitalization due to acute coronary syndrome (OR 0.48, 95%CI 0.33–0.69, p < 0.001), and anemia (OR 0.62, 95%CI 0.48–0.81, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Most AF patients with a high thromboembolic risk received OACs. The factors predisposing a lack of OAC use in these patients were conditions that significantly increased the risk of bleeding complications.

Hemorrhagic transformation and stroke recurrence in children with cardiac disease receiving antithrombotic therapy for secondary stroke prevention

BackgroundAntithrombotic therapy is currently recommended for stroke prevention in pediatric cardioembolic stroke where the recurrence risk is high; however, safety concerns remain. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic predictors of hemorrhagic transformation and stroke recurrence in children with cardiac disease to ascertain the safety and failure rates for secondary stroke prevention. MethodsThis was a single‐center, retrospective analysis of a prospectively enrolled cohort of children with radiologically confirmed cardioembolic stroke from January 2003 to December 2017 treated with institutional guidelines. ResultsEighty‐two children met inclusion criteria (male 44 [54%]; neonates 23 [28%]; median age 0.43 years [0.08–4.23]). Hemorrhagic transformation occurred in 20 (24%) with the majority (75% of 20) being petechial and asymptomatic. One death (1%) was reported from hemorrhagic transformation. Four children (5%) had major extracranial hemorrhage. Most (95%) received antithrombic therapy, with anticoagulation being favored (82%). Greater stroke volume was associated with hemorrhagic transformation using the pediatric Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (6.1 ± 3.3 vs. 3.5 ± 2.3; p = .006). Stroke recurred in 11 (13%) children at a median 32 days (5.5–93) from the index event and the majority (90%) were on treatment at the time of recurrence. Children with univentricular physiology were less likely to have hemorrhagic transformation (RR 0.31; 95% CI 0.09–0.96, p = .04); however, they had higher rates of recurrent stroke before final palliative repair. ConclusionsIn spite of the 24% hemorrhagic transformation rate, antithrombotic therapy has a positive risk‐balance in certain cardioembolic stroke subgroups, particularly in those with single‐ventricle physiology, when accounting for stroke volume.

Total autogenous revascularization of an innominate artery occlusive disease

Total autogenous revascularization of an innominate artery occlusive disease

Left atrial appendage occlusion vs novel oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: rationale and design of the multicenter randomized occlusion-AF trial

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasing globally, which is a major clinical and public health concern due to the 5-fold increased risk of stroke. Oral anticoagulation with novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is the current primary option for stroke prevention in patients with AF, although it increases the risk of major bleeding. Patients with prior ischemic cerebrovascular events are at particularly high risk of both recurrent ischemic events and major bleeding. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) provides an alternative option for stroke prevention in high-risk patients, however, with currently limited evidence. Thus, randomized trials comparing LAAO to NOACs are needed. The Occlusion-AF trial is designed to assess whether LAAO is non-inferior to NOAC therapy for reduction of the combined endpoint of stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium ≥ 3) and all-cause mortality in patients with AF and a recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Investigator-initiated multicenter, multinational, randomized open-label non-inferiority trial with blinded outcome evaluation (PROBE design). Patients with documented AF, and an ischemic stroke or TIA within 6 months will be eligible for enrollment. Major exclusion criteria are modified Rankin Scale > 3 at enrollment, glomerular filtration rate < 15 ml/min, and life-expectancy less than 2 years. A total of 750 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either a NOAC or LAAO using the Amplatzer Amulet (Abbott, MN, USA) or Watchman FLX (Boston Scientific, MN, USA) with subsequent life-long aspirin 75 mg daily. Follow-up will be based on in-office and telephone follow-up in combination with long-term follow-up (10 years) through national hospital discharge registries in the individual Nordic countries. The primary outcome will be a composite endpoint of stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding (BARC ≥ 3) and all-cause mortality at 2-year follow-up. The Occlusion-AF trial is designed to compare LAAO to NOAC therapy for secondary stroke prevention in AF patients with a high risk of recurrent thromboembolic events, i.e. with previous ischemic stroke or TIA, and otherwise eligible for anticoagulation. The results are expected to contribute significantly to the understanding of the effects of LAAO compared to the standard contemporary pharmacological treatment in these patients.

Medical and Device Therapy for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

Medical and Device Therapy for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

Correction to: Antihypertensives and Statin Therapy for Primary Stroke Prevention: A Secondary Analysis of the HOPE-3 Trial.

Correction to: Antihypertensives and Statin Therapy for Primary Stroke Prevention: A Secondary Analysis of the HOPE-3 Trial.

Secondary stroke prevention in patients with patent foramen ovale.

Although a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is an established risk factor for cryptogenic ischemic stroke, strategies for secondary prevention remain controversial. Increasing evidence over the past decade from well designed clinical trials supports transcatheter PFO closure for selected patients whose stroke was likely attributable to the PFO. However, patient selection using imaging findings, clinical scoring systems, and in some cases, thrombophilia testing, is crucial for determining patients most likely to benefit from closure, anticoagulation, or antiplatelet therapy. Recent studies have found that patients with a high Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score and those with a thrombophilia benefit more from closure than medical therapy (including antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy) alone. Meta-analyses have demonstrated an increased short-term risk of atrial fibrillation in closure patients, and that residual shunt after closure predicts stroke recurrence. Last, recent data have been inconclusive as to whether patients receiving medical therapy only benefit more from anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy, so this remains an area of controversy. Transcatheter PFO closure is an evidence-based, guideline-supported therapy for secondary stroke prevention in patients with a PFO and cryptogenic stroke. However, proper patient selection is critical to achieve benefit, and recent studies have helped clarify those patients most likely to benefit from closure.

The Gap in Prescribing Stroke Prevention Therapies in Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery.

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) commonly occurs after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Patients with POAF are at higher risk of stroke and mortality. The use of oral anticoagulation (OAC) in POAF remains inconsistent, and the care gap is unknown. We sought to evaluate rate of adherence and factors associated with OAC use in POAF patients after isolated CABG. In this study, all patients who had an isolated CABG between April 1, 2019 and March 30, 2020, at Health Sciences North, Sudbury retrospectively were evaluated. We identified all patients who developed POAF and captured the use of OAC. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of OAC prescription. In total, 339 CABG patients between April 1, 2019 and March 30, 2020, were identified; 86 patients developed POAF. No patients had major perioperative bleeding. All POAF patients had an indication for OAC therapies based on CHADS 65 score. However, only 17 (19.8%) patients with POAF had OAC prescription at the time of hospital discharge. Baseline characteristics were similar between those with or without OAC. In multivariable analysis, the use of dual antiplatelet therapy was associated with a decreased use of OAC therapy in POAF (OR 0.037 (95% CI 0.005, 0.29), P = .002). Moreover, in comparison to surgeon A, surgeon B was associated with a decreased use of OAC therapy, whereas surgeon C was associated with an increased use of OAC therapy in POAF (OR 0.15 (95% CI 0.03, 0.83), P = .03 and OR 6.49 (95% CI 1.21, 34.82), P = .03, respectively). None of the CHADS 65 elements, including age, hypertension, stroke, diabetes mellitus or congestive heart failure, correlated with the use of OAC. Eighty percent of patients who developed POAF after isolated CABG failed to receive stroke prevention therapies. The use of dual antiplatelet therapy and individual surgeons' preference were associated with the use of OAC therapy among POAF. This data set suggests that approximately only 1 in 5 patients with POAF after isolated CABG got prescribed OAC.

Prevalence of soft tissue calcifications in panoramic radiographs of the maxillofacial region of older adults.

To investigate the presence of soft tissue calcifications in the head and neck region on panoramic radiographs of older adults. We analysed 1176 panoramic radiographs obtained between January 2013 and December 2018 from individuals of both sexes aged 60years or older, who were referred by dental specialities to the Dental Imaginology Service of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. The types of soft tissue calcification evaluated were as follows: carotid artery calcification (CAC), thyroid cartilage calcifications, triticeous cartilage calcifications, sialoliths, tonsilloliths and lymph node calcifications. The presence of soft tissue calcifications was correlated with age and sex. The chi-square test with continuity correction was used for the calculation of p values and the evaluation of the proposed associations. Prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals were also calculated. At least one type of soft tissue calcification was found in 43% of the sample. The main calcifications detected were CAC, thyroid and triticeous cartilage calcifications, tonsilloliths,sialoliths, calcified lymph nodes, and phleboliths. Mean patient age was 67.47years and there was a predominance of females (62.8%) in the sample. Bivariate analysis showed a statistically significant association between female sex and the presence of thyroid and triticeous cartilage calcifications and between male sex and the presence of tonsilloliths. Routine panoramic radiography permits the identification of soft tissue calcifications that may be indicators of future cardiovascular disorders, the referral to a medical service and the establishment of therapies for stroke prevention.

Inflammation and Stroke Risk: A New Target for Prevention.

New therapeutic approaches are required for secondary prevention of residual vascular risk after stroke. Diverse sources of evidence support a causal role for inflammation in the pathogenesis of stroke. Randomized controlled trials of anti-inflammatory agents have reported benefit for secondary prevention in patients with coronary disease. We review the data from observational studies supporting a role for inflammation in pathogenesis of stroke, overview randomized controlled trials of anti-inflammatory therapy in cardiac disease and discuss the potential implications for stroke prevention therapy.