Therapy For Primary Prevention Research Articles

EPIDEMIOLOGICALTRENDS IN INDIAN DYSLIPIDEMIA PATIENTS ON PRIMARY PREVENTION THERAPY

EPIDEMIOLOGICALTRENDS IN INDIAN DYSLIPIDEMIA PATIENTS ON PRIMARY PREVENTION THERAPY

Statin therapy in primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention

Statin therapy in primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention

Revisiting ICD Therapy for Primary Prevention in Patients With HeartFailure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are recommended to reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The landmark studies leading to the current guideline recommendations preceded the 4 pillars of guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMTs). Therefore, some have questioned the role of ICDs for primary prevention in current clinical practice. In this paper, the authors provide an overview of the current ICD recommendations, including the instrumental clinical trials, the risk of SCD as observed in clinical trials vs real-world scenarios, disparities in ICD use among different patient populations, the impact of contemporary GDMT on outcomes, and ongoing and future trials and methodologies to help identify patients who are at an increased risk of SCD and who may benefit from an ICD. The authors also propose a pragmatic guidance for clinicians when they engage in the shared decision-making discussions for primary ICD implantation.

Age-related features of the main risk factors and clinical and laboratory parameters in men aged 30–50 years with atherothrombotic stroke

Introduction. Ischemic stroke in patients under 50 years of age is not uncommon. The prevalence of stroke in young people increases due to the increase in risk factors. Early detection of risk factors and optimization of primary and secondary preventive therapy are mandatory to reduce the burden of stroke in young people and preserve potential years of life.Objective. To identify and evaluate the main risk factors and clinical and laboratory parameters in men aged 31–40 and 41–50 years with atherothrombotic stroke.Material and methods. Before the development of the COVID-19 pandemic, 60 patients were examined (mean age 43.3±3.8 years). All patients underwent neuroimaging of the brain, ultrasound examination of the main vessels of the head, echocardiography, ECG, and laboratory analysis of blood serum.Results. Among all patients, there were 10 patients aged 31–40 years (mean age 37.4±2.6 years) and 50 patients aged 41–50 years (mean age 44.5±2.8 years). All patients had atherosclerotic lesions of the main arteries of the head, with stenosis of more than 70 % only in patients aged 41–50 years. Among patients aged 31–40 years and 41–50 years, the most common risk factors were arterial hypertension (90 and 72 %), smoking (70 and 72 %), dyslipidemia (66.7 and 60 %), and regular alcohol consumption (30 and 36 %). The study showed statistically significant correlations of the main vascular risk factors with serum lipid metabolism indices, hemostasis and endothelial dysfunction markers.Conclusions. The study showed the frequency of occurrence of the main risk factors in patients with atherothrombotic stroke aged 31–40 and 41–50 years, as well as the role of lipid metabolism disorders, hemostasis disorders and endothelial dysfunction in their development.

Adherence to the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for dyslipidaemia management in a large rheumatoid arthritis cohort: Data from the CORDIS Study Group of the Italian Society of Rheumatology

Background/aimLipid-lowering therapy prescription is low in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, often not achieving lipid threshold target despite treatment. However, evidence derives from small, monocentric cohorts. We assessed adherence to lipid-lowering treatment for primary cardiovascular (CV) prevention in a RA cohort according to international guidelines. MethodsA cross-sectional analysis of an Italian RA cohort was performed. Disease-related features and traditional CV risk factors were collected. The 10-year CV risk was estimated by Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE-2) algorithm. The primary preventive dyslipidaemia strategy was assessed according to 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society guidelines. Results1.133 RA patients (78.2% female, aged 60.6±10.2 years) free from CV events were included. According to SCORE-2, 42.9% of patients were at moderate risk (1–5-%), 33.3% at high risk (5–10%) and 23.7% at very high risk (>10%). In the whole cohort, 12.9% of patients with <5%, 23.6% with 5–10% and 32.3% with >10% risk were on statin, respectively (p<0.001). According to 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines, 51.5% of patients had LDL-c at target. Among patients with LDL-c not at target, 76% were not on lipid-lowering treatment. At multivariate analysis, patients with higher CV risk had significantly lower probability of LDL-c at target. ConclusionIn a wide Italian RA cohort, more than 50% of patients had high or very high CV risk. In these, lipid-lowering treatment prescription is suboptimal leading to not achievement of LDL-c target. Physicians should improve lipid screening and primary prevention therapy to reduce CV risk and improve CV comorbidity in RA patients.

Amiodarone or Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Chagas Cardiomyopathy

Over 10 000 people with Chagas disease experience sudden cardiac death (SCD) annually, mostly caused by ventricular fibrillation. Amiodarone hydrochloride and the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) have been empirically used to prevent SCD in patients with chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy. To test the hypothesis that ICD is more effective than amiodarone therapy for primary prevention of all-cause mortality in patients with chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy and moderate to high mortality risk, assessed by the Rassi score. CHAGASICS is an open-label, randomized clinical trial. The study enrolled patients from 13 centers in Brazil from May 30, 2014, to August 13, 2021, with the last follow-up November 8, 2021. Patients with serological findings positive for Chagas disease, a Rassi risk score of at least 10 points (intermediate to high risk), and at least 1 episode of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia were eligible to participate. Data were analyzed from May 3, 2022, to June 16, 2023. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive ICD or amiodarone (with a loading dose of 600 mg after randomization). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes included SCD, hospitalization for heart failure, and necessity of a pacemaker during the entire follow-up. The study was stopped prematurely for administrative reasons, with 323 patients randomized (166 in the amiodarone group and 157 in the ICD group), rather than the intended 1100 patients. Analysis was by intention to treat at a median follow-up of 3.6 (IQR, 1.8-4.4) years. Mean (SD) age was 57.4 (9.8) years, 185 patients (57.3%) were male, and the mean (SD) left ventricular ejection fraction was 37.0% (11.6%). There were 60 deaths (38.2%) in the ICD arm and 64 (38.6%) in the amiodarone group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86 [95% CI, 0.60-1.22]; P = .40). The rates of SCD (6 [3.8%] vs 23 [13.9%]; HR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.10-0.61]; P = .001), bradycardia requiring pacing (3 [1.9%] vs 27 [16.3%]; HR, 0.10 [95% CI, 0.03-0.34]; P < .001), and heart failure hospitalization (14 [8.9%] vs 28 [16.9%]; HR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.24-0.87]; P = .01) were lower in the ICD group compared with the amiodarone arm. In patients with chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy at moderate to high risk of mortality, ICD did not reduce the risk of all-cause mortality. However, ICD significantly reduced the risk of SCD, pacing need, and heart failure hospitalization compared with amiodarone therapy. Further studies are warranted to confirm the evidence generated by this trial. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01722942.

Management of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing dental procedures

A growing number of patients receiving antithrombotic therapy require dental procedures. Dental interventions in these patients can be challenging, as the risk of bleeding from the continuation of antithrombotic therapy needs to be weighed against the thromboembolic risk associated with drug interruption or de-escalation. Most minor dental procedures, including simple dental cleaning and filling, pose minimal bleeding risk, and antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy can be continued without interruption. Local hemostatic measures, such as tranexamic mouthwash, can be used, as needed, to reduce bleeding events following these interventions. Managing antithrombotic therapy during more invasive dental interventions and oral surgeries with a higher risk of perioperative bleeding necessitates the consideration of specific factors influencing the bleeding risk and thromboembolism. In patients receiving antithrombotic therapy for primary prevention, temporary interruption is reasonable. In others, the decisions may be more complex and more nuanced. In this article, we review the current evidence for managing patients receiving oral antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs scheduled for various dental procedures and present a practical approach for the periprocedural management of antithrombotic treatments.

Impact of Statin Therapy on Diabetes Incidence: Implications for Primary Prevention.

The present review aims to summarize current evidence, explore underlying mechanisms, and help guide clinicians regarding statin therapy and diabetes risk in primary prevention. The observational and genetic epidemiology, as well as evidence from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses, illustrate a modest, dose-dependent increase in risk of diabetes from statin therapy. Risk of new onset diabetes from statins appears to be greatest in those near the diagnostic threshold for diabetes or with diabetes risk factors prior to statin initiation. The risk of incident diabetes is vastly offset by the cardiovascular protection offered from statin therapy and should not deter guideline recommended statin initiation in primary prevention.

The pattern of lipid lowering therapy for primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention in Egypt; Phase-I of the CEPHEUS-3 study

The pattern of lipid lowering therapy for primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention in Egypt; Phase-I of the CEPHEUS-3 study

Initiation of lipid-lowering therapy as primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in the elderly.

This study aimed to analyse the initiation adherence phase to lipid-lowering therapy for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in a Spanish population aged 70 years or older. The secondary objective was to identify the determinants of initiation and early discontinuation. This was an observational study conducted in the CArdiovascular Risk factors for HEalth Service research (CARhES) cohort. People aged 70 and older with a first prescription of a lipid-lowering drug and without a previous major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) were selected (2018-2021). Data on sociodemographics, clinical conditions, drugs and use of health services were collected from clinical and administrative electronic databases. The study population was classified into: non-initiation, early discontinuation (i.e., discontinuation after the first dispensing) and initiation with more than one dispensing. Their characteristics were compared. Determinants of initiation and early discontinuation were explored. Among the 15 019 people studied, 80.2% initiated the medication, 11.2% showed an early discontinuation and 8.6% were non-initiators. An older age or conditions such as dementia, diabetes or depression reduced the likelihood of initiation, while obesity and a high pharmacological burden increased it. People over 90 years of age or those prescribed a statin in combination were more likely to have an early discontinuation. Non-initiation and early discontinuation are common among older people prescribed lipid-lowering drugs as primary prevention of cardiovascular disease for the first time. The presence of chronic pathologies other than cardiovascular ones should be considered when assessing whether or not to prescribe these drugs in the elderly.

Effectiveness of polypill for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial (PolyPars)

BackgroundWe aimed to investigate the effectiveness of fixed-dose combination therapy (polypill) for primary and secondary prevention of major cardiovascular diseases in a typical rural setting.MethodsThe PolyPars Study is a two-arm...

Lipid lowering for prevention of venous thromboembolism: a network meta-analysis.

Studies have suggested that statins may be associated with reduced risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of the current study was to assess the evidence regarding the comparative effect of all lipid-lowering therapies (LLT) in primary VTE prevention. After a systematic search of PubMed, CENTRAL, and Web of Science up until 2 November 2022, randomized controlled trials (RCT) of statins (high- or low-/moderate-intensity), ezetimibe, or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) were selected. An additive component network meta-analysis to compare VTE risk during long-term follow-up across different combinations of LLT was performed. Forty-five RCTs (n = 254 933 patients) were identified, reporting a total of 2084 VTE events. Compared with placebo, the combination of PCSK9i with high-intensity statin was associated with the largest reduction in VTE risk (risk ratio [RR] 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-0.80), while there was a trend towards reduction for high-intensity (0.84; 0.70-1.02) and low-/moderate-intensity (0.89; 0.79-1.00) statin monotherapy. Ezetimibe monotherapy did not affect the VTE risk (1.04; 0.83-1.30). There was a gradual increase in the summary effect of VTE reduction with increasing intensity of the LLT. When compared with low-/moderate-intensity statin monotherapy, the combination of PCSK9i and high-intensity statin was significantly more likely to reduce VTE risk (0.66; 0.49-0.89). The present meta-analysis of RCTs suggests that LLT may have a potential for VTE prevention, particularly in high-intensity dosing and in combination therapy.

Summary for Patients: Benefits and Risks Associated With Statin Therapy for Primary Prevention in Old and Very Old Adults.

Summary for Patients: Benefits and Risks Associated With Statin Therapy for Primary Prevention in Old and Very Old Adults.

Benefits and Risks Associated With Statin Therapy for Primary Prevention in Old and Very Old Adults : Real-World Evidence From a Target Trial Emulation Study.

There is little consensus on using statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and all-cause mortality in adults aged 75 years or older due to the underrepresentation of this population in randomized controlled trials. To investigate the benefits and risks of using statins for primary prevention in old (aged 75 to 84 years) and very old (aged ≥85 years) adults. Sequential target trial emulation comparing matched cohorts initiating versus not initiating statin therapy. Territory-wide public electronic medical records in Hong Kong. Persons aged 75 years or older who met indications for statin initiation from January 2008 to December 2015 were included. Participants with preexisting diagnosed CVDs at baseline, such as coronary heart disease (CHD), were excluded from the analysis. Among 69 981 eligible persons aged 75 to 84 years and 14 555 persons aged 85 years or older, 41 884 and 9457 had history of CHD equivalents (for example, diabetes) in the respective age groups. Initiation of statin therapy. Incidence of major CVDs (stroke, myocardial infarction, or heart failure), all-cause mortality, and major adverse events (myopathies and liver dysfunction). Of 42 680 matched person-trials aged 75 to 84 years and 5390 matched person-trials aged 85 years or older (average follow-up, 5.3 years), 9676 and 1600 of them developed CVDs in each age group, respectively. Risk reduction for overall CVD incidence was found for initiating statin therapy in adults aged 75 to 84 years (5-year standardized risk reduction, 1.20% [95% CI, 0.57% to 1.82%] in the intention-to-treat [ITT] analysis; 5.00% [CI, 1.11% to 8.89%] in the per protocol [PP] analysis) and in those aged 85 years or older (ITT: 4.44% [CI, 1.40% to 7.48%]; PP: 12.50% [CI, 4.33% to 20.66%]). No significantly increased risks for myopathies and liver dysfunction were found in both age groups. Unmeasured confounders, such as lifestyle factors of diet and physical activity, may exist. Reduction for CVDs after statin therapy were seen in patients aged 75 years or older without increasing risks for severe adverse effects. Of note, the benefits and safety of statin therapy were consistently found in adults aged 85 years or older. Health Bureau, the Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China, and National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Lack of Prognostic Value of T-Wave Alternans for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Benefit in Primary Prevention.

New methods to identify patients who benefit from a primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) are needed. T-wave alternans (TWA) has been shown to associate with arrhythmogenesis of the heart and sudden cardiac death. We hypothesized that TWA might be associated with benefit from ICD implantation in primary prevention. In the EU-CERT-ICD (European Comparative Effectiveness Research to Assess the Use of Primary Prophylactic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators) study, we prospectively enrolled 2327 candidates for primary prophylactic ICD. A 24-hour Holter monitor reading was taken from all recruited patients at enrollment. TWA was assessed from Holter monitoring using the modified moving average method. Study outcomes were all-cause death, appropriate shock, and survival benefit. TWA was assessed both as a contiguous variable and as a dichotomized variable with cutoff points <47 μV and <60 μV. The final cohort included 1734 valid T-wave alternans samples, 1211 patients with ICD, and 523 control patients with conservative treatment, with a mean follow-up time of 2.3 years. TWA ≥60 μV was a predicter for a higher all-cause death in patients with an ICD on the basis of a univariate Cox regression model (hazard ratio, 1.484 [95% CI, 1.024-2.151]; P=0.0374; concordance statistic, 0.51). In multivariable models, TWA was not prognostic of death or appropriate shocks in patients with an ICD. In addition, TWA was not prognostic of death in control patients. In a propensity score-adjusted Cox regression model, TWA was not a predictor of ICD benefit. T-wave alternans is poorly prognostic in patients with a primary prophylactic ICD. Although it may be prognostic of life-threatening arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in several patient populations, it does not seem to be useful in assessing benefit from ICD therapy in primary prevention among patients with an ejection fraction of ≤35%.

ANTIPLATELET THERAPY IN PRIMARY PREVENTION. OBSERVATIONAL STUDY AND SURVIVAL ANALYSIS IN HIGH CARDIOVASCULAR RISK PATIENTS.

Objective: Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in industrialized countries. This was a retrospective observational study, evaluating clinical outcomes, metabolic consequences and survival rate resulting from prolonged antiplatelet therapy for primary prevention in patients with high CVR. Design and method: Overall, 516 patients were randomly selected from cardiovascular risk and metabolism consultations in a single center in Porto (Portugal). Sociodemographic, lifestyle and clinical characteristics were collected at baseline, including biochemical parameters, vascular risk scores and tests for heart and cardiovascular evaluation. In this follow-up with a median of 11 years, 287 patients received adjuvant antiplatelet therapy in primary prevention. Association between sex, observation time and treatments with LDLc and HDLc variations were assessed. Multiple linear regression was performed to evaluate which factors could explain the differences in HDLc and LDLc levels. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was also conducted. Results: Therapy with statins was initiated early for metabolic compensation of dyslipidemia, according to clinical practice. Statistically significant reductions were found for almost all biochemical parameters, mean carotid intima-media thickness and lipid metabolism parameters, including triglycerides, total cholesterol and the respective fractions. Patients taking statins showed greater increased HDLc values and reduced LDLc values than those who were not. Additionally, women showed a more favorable evolution regarding HDLc increase compared to men. Survival rate was estimated at 77.5% with 22 years as the maximum observed time. The median time of survival was not computed, since more than half of the patients (77.5%) were alive after 22 years. No bleeding episodes were recorded during this long period of observation.In fact, 99.0% of patients were alive after 10 years and the percentage of patients alive remained over 90% at 17 years. After 18 years of observation, 88.6% of patients were alive, and at 20 years 77.5% were alive without major cardiovascular events (MACE). Conclusions: Antiplatelet therapy should always be considered in primary prevention in patients with high CVR. There were no cases of hemorrhage or MACE. The survival rate estimated for the study population was 77.5% over 22 years.

Coronary Calcium Is Elevated in Patients with Myocardial Infarction without Standard Modifiable Risk Factors.

Objectives: Recent reports have highlighted myocardial infarction (MI) patients without standard modifiable risk factors (SMRF), noting them to be surprisingly common and to have a substantial risk of adverse outcomes. The objective of this study was to address the challenge of identifying at-risk patients without SMRF and providing preventive therapy. Methods: Patients presenting between 2001 and 2021 to Intermountain Health catheterization laboratories with a diagnosis of MI were included if they also had a coronary artery calcium (CAC) scan by computed tomography within 2 years. SMRF were defined as a clinical diagnosis or treatment of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, or smoking. The co-primary endpoints in SMRF-less patients were: (1) proportion of patients with an elevated (>50%ile) CAC score, and (2) an indication for statin therapy (i.e., CAC ≥ 100 AU or ≥75%ile). The 60-day and long-term major adverse cardiovascular events were determined. A comparison set included MI patients with SMRF. Results: We identified 429 MI patients with a concurrent CAC scan, of which 60 had no SMRF. SMRF status did not distinguish most risk factors or interventions. No-SMRF patients had a high CAC prevalence and percentile (82% ≥ 50%ile; median, 80%ile), and 77% met criteria for preventive therapy. As expected, patients with SMRF had high CAC scores and percentiles. Outcomes were more favorable for No-SMRF status and for lower CAC scores. Conclusions: Patients without SMRF presenting with an MI have a high prevalence and percentile of CAC. Wider application of CAC scans, including in those without SMRF, is promising as a method to identify an additional at-risk population for MI and to provide primary preventive therapy.

Effectiveness of Statin Therapy for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Stroke: A Literature Review

Effectiveness of Statin Therapy for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Stroke: A Literature Review

Regenerative Anterior Cruciate Ligament Healing in Youth and Adolescent Athletes: The Emerging Age of Recovery Science.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries mainly arise from non-contact mechanisms during sport performance, with most injuries occurring among youth or adolescent-age athletes, particularly females. The growing popularity of elite-level sport training has increased the total volume, intensity and frequency of exercise and competition loading to levels that may exceed natural healing capacity. Growing evidence suggests that the prevailing mechanism that leads to non-contact ACL injury from sudden mechanical fatigue failure may be accumulated microtrauma. Given the consequences of primary ACL injury on the future health and quality of life of youth and adolescent athletes, the objective of this review is to identify key "recovery science" factors that can help prevent these injuries. Recovery science is any aspect of sports training (type, volume, intensity, frequency), nutrition, and sleep/rest or other therapeutic modalities that may prevent the accumulated microtrauma that precedes non-contact ACL injury from sudden mechanical fatigue failure. This review discusses ACL injury epidemiology, current surgical efficacy, the native ACL vascular network, regional ACL histological complexities such as the entheses and crimp patterns, extracellular matrix remodeling, the concept of causal histogenesis, exercise dosage and ligament metabolism, central nervous system reorganization post-ACL rupture, homeostasis regulation, nutrition, sleep and the autonomic nervous system. Based on this information, now may be a good time to re-think primary ACL injury prevention strategies with greater use of modified sport training, improved active recovery that includes well-planned nutrition, and healthy sleep patterns. The scientific rationale behind the efficacy of regenerative orthobiologics and concomitant therapies for primary ACL injury prevention in youth and adolescent athletes are also discussed.

Impact of a Chronic Total Coronary Occlusion on the Incidence of Appropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shocks and Mortality: A Substudy of the Dutch Outcome in ICD Therapy (DO-IT)) Registry.

Chronic total coronary occlusions (CTO) substantially increase the risk for sudden cardiac death. Among patients with chronic ischemic heart disease at risk for sudden cardiac death, an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is the favored therapy for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. This study sought to investigate the impact of CTOs on the risk for appropriate ICD shocks and mortality within a nationwide prospective cohort. This is a subanalysis of the nationwide Dutch-Outcome in ICD Therapy (DO-IT) registry of primary prevention ICD recipients in The Netherlands between September 2014 and June 2016 (n=1442). We identified patients with chronic ischemic heart disease (n=663) and assessed available coronary angiograms for CTO presence (n=415). Patients with revascularized CTOs were excluded (n=79). The primary end point was the composite of all-cause mortality and appropriate ICD shocks. Clinical follow-up was conducted for at least 2 years. A total of 336 patients were included, with an average age of 67±9 years, and 20.5% was female (n=69). An unrevascularized CTO was identified in 110 patients (32.7%). During a median follow-up period of 27 months (interquartile range, 24-32), the primary end point occurred in 21.1% of patients with CTO (n=23) compared with 11.9% in patients without CTO (n=27; P=0.034). Corrected for baseline characteristics including left ventricular ejection fraction, and the presence of a CTO was an independent predictor for the primary end point (hazard ratio, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.03-3.22]; P=0.038). Within this nationwide prospective registry of primary prevention ICD recipients, the presence of an unrevascularized CTO was an independent predictor for the composite outcome of all-cause mortality and appropriate ICD shocks.