Therapy For HER2-positive Breast Cancer Research Articles

Abstract P1-11-20: Trastuzumab (HLX02) plus Pertuzumab as Dual-target Neoadjuvant Therapy for HER2-positive Breast Cancer: A Real-World Study

Abstract Background: The effect of neoadjuvant therapy on tumor downstaging and breast-conserving during surgery is well documented. Pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant treatment was associated with long-term survival. HLX02 (Zercepac®), a biosimilar of trastuzumab, showed the same efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity as the reference drug in human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive patients. Despite this, real-world evidence of its effectiveness when combined with pertuzumab in neoadjuvant treatment of HER-2 positive breast cancer still lacks. Methods: In this retrospective real-world study, women with confirmed invasive HER2-positive breast cancer who have received chemotherapy plus HLX02 and pertuzumab (Perjeta®) as neoadjuvant therapy were enrolled. Patients must be over 18 years old, have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1, and have a baseline left ventricular ejection fraction of ≥ 55%. Patients without pathological assessment after neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was defined as no residual invasive tumors in mammary glands and axillary lymph nodes. Clinical response was assessed using RECIST1.1. To investigate the factors associated with pCR, univariate and multivariate logistic regression (forward stepwise) analyses were conducted. Results: A total of 85 patients were enrolled in this study, and 55 patients (64.71%) achieved pCR after neoadjuvant therapy. There were 84 (98.82%) patients with partial response (PR), one (1.18%) patient with stable disease (SD). According to the univariable analysis, when compared to those with a tumor diameter ≤ 5 cm, patients with a tumor diameter > 5 cm at baseline showed a lower pCR rate (odds ratio [OR] = 0.286; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.108-0.758, P = 0.01). Patients with preoperative PR positivity > 10% showed lower pCR rate than those with preoperative PR positivity < 1% (OR = 0.115, 95% CI 0.036-0.372, P = 0.02). Besides, pCR was more common in patients with preoperative hormone receptor (HR)-negative than in those with preoperative HR-positive (ER or PR positivity > 10%) (OR = 4.452, 95% CI 1.679-11.804, P < 0.01). Multivariable analyses showed that patients with tumor diameter > 5 cm had a lower pCR rate than those with tumor diameter ≤ 5cm (OR = 0.213; 95% CI 0.070-0.644, P = 0.01). Patients with preoperative HR-negative tumors were more likely to achieve pCR than those with preoperative HR-positive tumors (OR =5.649, 95% CI 1.927-16.556, P < 0.01) (Table 1). The treatment were well tolerated by patients, and no additional adverse events were reported. Conclusion: According to this real-world study, HLX02 in combination with pertuzumab as neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer patients showed a similar pCR rate to that of dual-target neoadjuvant therapy reported in previous clinical trials. The treatment showed an encouraging effectiveness, and may become a novel neoadjuvant option for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. The study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (21ZR1414700). Table 1. Logistic regression for pCR. Citation Format: Yin Liu, Wen-Jia Zuo, Ruo-Xi Wang, Zhong-Hua Wang, Zhi-Ming Shao. Trastuzumab (HLX02) plus Pertuzumab as Dual-target Neoadjuvant Therapy for HER2-positive Breast Cancer: A Real-World Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-11-20.

Abstract P2-16-04: MNX1 promotes tumor sensitivity to HER2-targeted therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer

Abstract Background: Female breast cancer has been the world’s leading cancer incidence among women. HER2-positive breast cancer accounts for about 15%~20% of all breast cancer, with a high degree of malignancy and easy metastasis and recurrence. With the development of medical technology and the continuous innovation of HER2 targeting drugs, patients with HER2-positive breast cancer have more treatment options and their prognosis had been greatly improved. However, there is still a lack of biomarkers for HER2-positive early breast cancer in clinical practice. Methods: This study prospectively collected single-center (Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, FUSCC) preoperative core needle biopsy samples of breast cancer patients from July 2017 to July 2018 who received neoadjuvant paclitaxel, carboplatin plus with trastuzumab (PCH). The patients were divided into pCR and non-PCR groups, and 81 patients were enrolled. The differential expression of genes was screened and validated by RNA-seq. The gene expression data for GSE181574 (this database has a total of 105 cases of breast cancer tissue samples were collected by core needle biopsy before neoadjuvant treatment. 52 cases underwent Ado-trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab, 9 cases of paclitaxel plus trastuzumab, and 44 cases of paclitaxel plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab), GSE52707 (SK-BR-3 Lapatinib resistance cell group vs control group), and GSE15043 (BT474 Herceptin-resistant cell group vs control group), were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Cell cloning formation, proliferation assay, and drug sensitivity experiments were conducted in MNX1 ectopic and knockdown cell lines. Co-IP assay, RNA-Seq, and ChIP-Seq analysis were used to explore the downstream pathways that MNX1 might be involved. Results: High-throughput sequencing results of core needle biopsy samples from 81 HER2-positive breast cancer patients were divided into pCR and non-pCR groups. Using DEseq2 packet analysis to screen differentially expressed genes, P-value < 0.05, | log2FoldChange | > 1 as the filter, there were 620 up-regulated genes and 715 down-regulated genes in the pCR group. The same method was used for the analysis of the GSE181574 data set. Combined the two datasets used P values and log2FoldChange (P-value < 0.05, | log2FoldChange | > 1.2) as selection criteria, we found the MNX1 and PNMT expressions were significantly higher in the pCR group. Subsequently, differential analysis of GSE52707 and GSE15043 datasets showed that MNX1 and PNMT expression levels were reduced in drug-resistant cell lines. Considering the P-value and | log2FoldChange |, we ultimately selected motor neuron and pancreatic homeobox 1(MNX1) gene as the target factors for follow-up studies. In the cloning formation and proliferation assay, overexpression of MNX1 inhibits proliferation and clonal formation of HER2-positive breast cancer cells. In the drug sensitivity experiments overexpression of MNX1 enhances the sensitivity of HER2-positive breast cancer cells to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) such as lapatinib and pyrotinib. MNX1 knockdown reduces the sensitivity of HER2-positive breast cancer cells to TKI. Through RNA-seq and ChIP-seq, we found that CD-M6PR might be a downstream target gene regulated by MNX1. Verification by Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay MNX1 was found to positively regulate CD-M6PR transcription. By Co-IP assay, it was found that MNX1 interacted with EEF1D, and EEF1D stabilized MNX1. MNX1 and CD-M6PR affect the proliferation and drug sensitivity of breast cancer cells by down-regulating the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway. Conclusion: Overexpression of MNX1 increases the sensitivity of HER-2 positive cells to TKI. MNX1 binds to EEF1D and is stabilized by EEF1D. MNX1 positively regulates M6PR and affects the proliferation of breast cancer cells and the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to TKI through the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway. Citation Format: Wei-Ru Chi, Bingqiu Xiu, Min Xiong, Pei Li, Qi Zhang, Lun Li, Jianjing Hou, Xujie Zhou, Yuting Sang, Ming Chen, Liyi Zhang, Jingyan Xue, Yayun Chi, Jiong Wu. MNX1 promotes tumor sensitivity to HER2-targeted therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-16-04.

Overall survival with neratinib after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer (ExteNET): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BackgroundExteNET showed that neratinib, an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, given for 1 year after trastuzumab-based therapy significantly improved invasive disease-free survival in women with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer. We report the final analysis of overall survival in ExteNET. MethodsIn this international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, women aged 18 years or older with stage 1–3c (amended to stage 2–3c) HER2-positive breast cancer who had completed neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned to oral neratinib 240 mg/day or placebo for 1 year. Randomisation was stratified according to hormone receptor (HR) status (HR-positive vs. HR-negative), nodal status (0, 1–3 or 4+), and trastuzumab regimen (sequentially vs. concurrently with chemotherapy). Overall survival was analysed by intention to treat. ExteNET is registered (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00878709) and is complete. ResultsBetween July 9, 2009, and October 24, 2011, 2840 women received neratinib (n = 1420) or placebo (n = 1420). After a median follow-up of 8.1 (IQR, 7.0–8.8) years, 127 patients (8.9%) in the neratinib group and 137 patients (9.6%) in the placebo group in the intention-to-treat population had died. Eight-year overall survival rates were 90.1% (95% CI 88.3–91.6) with neratinib and 90.2% (95% CI 88.4–91.7) with placebo (stratified hazard ratio 0.95; 95% CI 0.75–1.21; p = 0.6914). ConclusionsOverall survival in the extended adjuvant setting was comparable for neratinib and placebo after a median follow-up of 8.1 years in women with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer.

Biomarker Data from the Phase III KATHERINE Study of Adjuvant T-DM1 versus Trastuzumab for Residual Invasive Disease after Neoadjuvant Therapy for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

In KATHERINE, adjuvant T-DM1 reduced risk of disease recurrence or death by 50% compared with trastuzumab in patients with residual invasive breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) comprised of HER2-targeted therapy and chemotherapy. This analysis aimed to identify biomarkers of response and differences in biomarker expression before and after NAT. Exploratory analyses investigated the relationship between invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and HER2 protein expression/gene amplification, PIK3CA hotspot mutations, and gene expression of HER2, PD-L1, CD8, predefined immune signatures, and Prediction Analysis of Microarray 50 intrinsic molecular subtypes, classified by Absolute Intrinsic Molecular Subtyping. HER2 expression on paired pre- and post-NAT samples was examined. T-DM1 appeared to improve IDFS versus trastuzumab across most biomarker subgroups, except the HER2 focal expression subgroup. High versus low HER2 gene expression in residual disease was associated with worse outcomes with trastuzumab [HR, 2.02; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.32-3.11], but IDFS with T-DM1 was independent of HER2 expression level (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.56-1.83). Low PD-L1 gene expression in residual disease was associated with worse outcomes with trastuzumab (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-1.00), but not T-DM1 (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.59-1.87). PIK3CA mutations were not prognostic. Increased variability in HER2 expression was observed in post-NAT versus paired pre-NAT samples. T-DM1 appears to overcome HER2 resistance. T-DM1 benefit does not appear dependent on immune activation, but these results do not rule out an influence of the tumor immune microenvironment on the degree of response.

Pathological complete response to neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer – real world data from the national cancer center in Serbia

Pathological complete response to neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer – real world data from the national cancer center in Serbia

Review of the status of neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer.

The development of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed therapies has revolutionized the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. The aim of this article is to review the continually evolving treatment strategies in the neoadjuvant setting of HER2-positive breast cancer, as well as the current challenges and future perspectives. Searches were undertaken on PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov for relevant publications and trials. The current standard of care in high-risk HER2-positive breast cancer is to combine chemotherapy with dual anti-HER2 therapy, for a synergistic anti-tumor effect. We discuss the pivotal trials which led to the adoption of this approach, as well as the benefit of these neoadjuvant strategies for guiding appropriate adjuvant therapy. De-escalation strategies are currently being investigated to avoid over treatment, and aim to safely reduce chemotherapy, while optimizing HER2-targeted therapies. The development and validation of a reliable biomarker is essential to enable these de-escalation strategies and personalization of treatment. In addition, promising novel therapies are currently being explored to further improve outcomes in HER2-positive breast cancer.

Immune repertoire and responses to neoadjuvant TCHP therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer.

Despite the introduction of trastuzumab, pathologic complete response (pCR) is not attained in approximately 30-40% of Human epithelial growth factor receptor-2-positive breast cancer. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) have been suggested as a predictive marker of treatment response, albeit not always effective. We investigated the relationship between trastuzumab, docetaxel, carboplatin, and pertuzumab (TCHP) treatment and immune repertoire as a treatment response predictor. In all, 35 cases were divided into two experimental groups: 10 and 25 cases in the preliminary and main experiments, respectively. In the preliminary experiment, the biopsy tissues before TCHP treatment and the surgical tissues after TCHP treatment were compared. In the main experiment, the biopsy tissues before TCHP treatment were compared according to the TCHP treatment response. The T-cell repertoire for TRA, TRB, TRG, and TRD, and B-cell repertoire for immunoglobulin heavy, immunoglobulin kappa, and immunoglobulin lambda were evaluated. Whole transcriptome sequencing was also performed. In the preliminary experiment, the density and richness of the T-cell receptor (TCR) and B-cell receptor (BCR) repertoires decreased after treatment, regardless of TCHP response. In the main experiment, the Shannon's entropy index, density, and length of CDR3 of the TCR and BCR repertoires did not differ significantly in patients who did and did not achieve pCR. The pCR and non-pCR subgroups according to the level of TILs revealed that the non-pCR/lowTIL group had a higher proportion of low-frequency clones than the pCR/lowTIL group in TRA (non-pCR/lowTIL versus pCR/lowTIL, 0.01-0.1%, 63% versus 45.3%; <0.01%, 32.9% versus 51.8%, p < 0.001) and TRB (non-pCR/lowTIL versus pCR/lowTIL, 0.01-0.1%, 26.5% versus 14.7%; <0.01%, 72.0% versus 84.1%, p < 0.001). The role of the diversity, richness, and density of the TCR and BCR repertoires as predictive markers for TCHP response was not identified. Compositions of low-frequency clones could be candidates for predictive factors of TCHP response; however, validation studies and further research are necessary.

A multicenter study on efficacy of dual-target neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer and a consistent analysis of efficacy evaluation of neoadjuvant therapy by Miller-Payne and RCB pathological evaluation systems (CSBrS-026).

The aim of this study was to investigate the factors influencing pathological complete response (pCR) rate in early breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant dual-target [trastuzumab (H) + pertuzumab (P)] therapy combined with chemotherapy. Additionally, the consistency of the Miller-Payne and residual cancer burden (RCB) systems in evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for early human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)+ breast cancer was analyzed. The clinicopathological data of female patients with early-stage HER2+ breast cancer who received dual-target neoadjuvant therapy at 26 hospitals of the Chinese Society of Breast Surgery (CSBrS) from March 2019 to December 2021 were collected. Patients were allocated to four groups: the HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+/hormone receptor (HR)-, IHC3+/HR+, IHC2+ in situ hybridization (ISH)+/HR- and IHC2+ ISH+/HR+ groups. The overall pCR rate for patients, the pCR rate in each group and the factors affecting the pCR rate were analyzed. The consistency between the Miller-Payne and RCB systems in assessing the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy was analyzed. From March 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021, 77,376 female patients with early-stage breast cancer were treated at 26 hospitals; 18,853 (24.4%) of these patients were HER2+. After exclusion of unqualified patients, 2,395 patients who received neoadjuvant dual-target (H+P) therapy combined with chemotherapy were included in this study. The overall pCR rate was 53.0%, and the patients' HR statuses and different HER2+ statuses were significantly correlated with the pCR rate (P<0.05). The consistency of the pathological efficacy assessed by the Miller-Payne and RCB systems was 88.0% (κ=0.717, P<0.001). Different HER2 expression statuses and HR expression statuses are correlated with the pCR rate after dual-target neoadjuvant therapy in HER2+ breast cancer patients. There is a relatively good consistency between Miller-Payne and RCB systems in evaluating the pathologic efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for HER2+ breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without anthracyclines in combination with single HER2-targeted therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer

BackgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) blockade is the preferred approach for treating early and locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. There is a lack of robust data comparing pathological complete response (pCR) and survival outcomes in anthracycline-free and anthracycline-containing regimens with single HER2-targeted therapy. ObjectivesThe present study retrospectively evaluated pCR between two groups: Single HER2-targeted therapy with and without anthracycline. MethodsA total of 215 HER2-positive female breast cancer patients were analyzed who received eitheranthracycline-containing EC-TH (epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, followed by docetaxel and trastuzumab)oranthracycline-free TCH [docetaxel, carboplatin and trastuzumab]. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified prognostic factors for survival and pCR.Kaplan Meier survival curvesdetermined disease-free survival(DFS) and overall survival (OS). ResultsBaseline characteristics were comparable in both treatment groups. The pCR rate was 30.8% in the anthracycline-containing EC-TH group and 40.9% in the anthracycline-free TCH group; p = 0.140. Disease-free survival at 3 years (65.8% vs. 58.4%) and 5 years (49.2% vs. 55.2%) was similar between EC-TH and TCH groups, respectively (log-rank p = 0.550). Three-year (95.5% vs. 92.5%) and five-year (84.4% vs. 80.8%) OSwere also comparable between both groups (log-rank p = 0.485). The anthracycline-containing EC-TH group had a higher incidence of febrile neutropenia (6.4%. vs. 3.6%) and cardiac adverse events (7.7% vs. 4.4%) than the anthracycline-free TCH group. ConclusionNeoadjuvant anthracycline-free chemotherapy has similar pCR and survival outcomeswith favourable cardiac and non-cardiac adverse effect profiles compared with anthracycline-containing chemotherapy.

Axillary Downstaging and the Impact of Clinical Axillary Status on Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Therapy for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Background: Lymph node downstaging and the achievement of total-pCR (ypT0/is ypN0) after neoadjuvant therapy are of great importance in HER-2 positive breast cancer. We aim to provide an overall review of neoadjuvant regimens for lymph node downstaging and to indirectly compare the total-pCR by various neoadjuvant regimens with network meta-analysis in HER2-positive patients according to their clinical lymph node status. Methods: Five English databases were searched comprehensively and systematically for relevant RCTs and case-control studies. The data extracted from the included studies were analyzed with the use of Review Manager 5.3 or STATA 15.0 software. Results: A total of 1508 published manuscripts were identified, and 17 studies including 4747 patients were finally included in our analysis. The network meta-analysis of total-pCR showed that dual-target therapy is significantly better than single-target therapy in clinically node-positive patients, and carboplatin performed significantly better than anthracycline in single-target condition. Lapatinib performed poorly in clinically node-positive patients. However, lapatinib in combination with trastuzumab was ranked at the top in the clinically node-negative group, and pertuzumab showed dissatisfied performance in contrast to the primacy of pertuzumab in clinically node-positive groups. Conclusion: In summary, different lymph node statuses led to the diverse first choice of neoadjuvant regimen. We highly recommended TCbHP as the first choice for the neoadjuvant treatment in clinically node-positive HER-2 positive breast cancer. Since lapatinib with trastuzumab ranked top in the clinically node-negative group, we looked forward to discovering the potential value of TKI in clinically node-negative patients, which needs further analysis in the future.

Focusing on NK cells and ADCC: A promising immunotherapy approach in targeted therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer.

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer has a high metastatic potential. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that target HER2, such as trastuzumab and pertuzumab, are the cornerstone of adjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer. A growing body of preclinical and clinical evidence points to the importance of innate immunity mediated by antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) in the clinical effect of mAbs on the resulting anti-tumor response. In this review, we provide an overview of the role of natural killer (NK) cells and ADCC in targeted therapy of HER2-positive breast cancer, including the biological functions of NK cells and the role of NK cells and ADCC in anti-HER2 targeted drugs. We then discuss regulatory mechanisms and recent strategies to leverage our knowledge of NK cells and ADCC as an immunotherapy approach for HER2-positive breast cancer.

Comparison of Biosimilar Trastuzumab ABP 980 with Reference Trastuzumab in Neoadjuvant Therapy for HER2-positive Breast Cancer - an Analysis of a Large University Breast Cancer Centre.

Background ABP980 is a biosimilar antibody to reference trastuzumab (RTZ). Aim of the following study is to confirm the similarity of ABP980 and RTZ in terms of clinical efficacy and safety in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC) undergoing neoadjuvant trastuzumab-containing chemotherapy in a clinical real-world situation that also includes patients receiving pertuzumab. Methods Patients with HER2-positive EBC, who were treated from 12/2010 to 03/2020 at the Department of Women's Health at Tuebingen University Hospital, Germany, with at least four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (+/- pertuzumab) in combination with ABP980 or RTZ were included in a retrospective analysis. For efficacy analysis patients achieving a pathologic complete remission (pCR = no invasive tumor in breast and lymph nodes) were compared. Safety was evaluated by comparing the number of patients with a decrease in left ventricular function (LVEF) of >10%. Results 124 patients were included of whom 46 (37.1%) have received ABP980 and 77 (62.9%) were treated with RTZ. A pCR was found in 77 patients (62.1%). For patients treated with ABP980 as compared to RTZ, there was no significant difference regarding efficacy (pCR-rates of 60.9% versus 62.8%, p=0.829) or cardiac safety (LVEF decline in 6.5% versus 2.6%, p=0.274). Conclusion Similarity of ABP980 as compared to RTZ was confirmed in a real-world situation, including a large proportion of patients that have also received pertuzumab treatment.

A multicentre single arm phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant pyrotinib and letrozole plus dalpiciclib for triple-positive breast cancer

Current therapies for HER2-positive breast cancer have limited efficacy in patients with triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC). We conduct a multi-center single-arm phase 2 trial to test the efficacy and safety of an oral neoadjuvant therapy with pyrotinib, letrozole and dalpiciclib (a CDK4/6 inhibitor) in patients with treatment-naïve, stage II–III TPBC with a Karnofsky score of ≥70 (NCT04486911). The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with pathological complete response (pCR) in the breast and axilla. The secondary endpoints include residual cancer burden (RCB)−0 or RCB-I, objective response rate (ORR), breast pCR (bpCR), safety and changes in molecular targets (Ki67) from baseline to surgery. Following 5 cycles of 4-week treatment, the results meet the primary endpoint with a pCR rate of 30.4% (24 of 79; 95% confidence interval (CI), 21.3–41.3). RCB-0/I is 55.7% (95% CI, 44.7–66.1). ORR is 87.4%, (95% CI, 78.1–93.2) and bpCR is 35.4% (95% CI, 25.8–46.5). The mean Ki67 expression reduces from 40.4% at baseline to 17.9% (P < 0.001) at time of surgery. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events are neutropenia, leukopenia, and diarrhoea. There is no serious adverse event- or treatment-related death. This fully oral, chemotherapy-free, triplet combined therapy has the potential to be an alternative neoadjuvant regimen for patients with TPBC.

Biotransformation of Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab in Breast Cancer Patients Assessed by Affinity Enrichment and Ion-Exchange Chromatography.

Therapeutic proteins (TPs) are known to be heterogeneous due to modifications that occur during the production process and storage. Modifications may also occur in TPs after their administration to patients due to in vivo biotransformation. Ligand binding assays, which are widely used in the bioanalysis of TPs in body fluids, are typically unable to distinguish such modifications. Liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry is being increasingly used to study modifications in TPs, but its use to study in vivo biotransformation has been limited until now. We present a novel approach that combines affinity enrichment using Affimer reagents with ion-exchange chromatography (IEX) to analyze charge variants of the TPs trastuzumab and pertuzumab in plasma of patients undergoing therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer. Affimer reagents were immobilized via engineered Cys tags to maleimide beads, and the TPs were eluted under acidic conditions followed by rapid neutralization. The enriched TPs were analyzed by cation-exchange chromatography (IEX) using pH-gradient elution, resulting in the separation of about 20 charge variants for trastuzumab and about five charge variants for pertuzumab. A comparison between in vitro stressed TPs spiked into plasma, and TPs enriched from patient plasma showed that the observed profiles were highly similar. This indicates that in vitro stress testing in plasma can mimic the situation in patient plasma, as far as the generation of charge variants is concerned. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This research attempts to elucidate the modifications that occur in therapeutic proteins (TPs) after they have been administered to patients. This is important because there is little knowledge about the fate of TPs in this regard, and certain modifications could affect their efficiency. Our results show that the modifications discovered are most likely due to a chemical process and are not patient specific.

Effectiveness and Safety of Zercepac and Reference Trastuzumab in the Neoadjuvant Setting for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Since the high cost of reference trastuzumab limits its clinical application, this study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of the Zercepac and reference product trastuzumab in neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer. This study retrospectively collected clinical data of patients with early-stageHER2-positive breast cancer, who received trastuzumab, pertuzumab, docetaxel, and platinum as neoadjuvant therapy from November 2020 to July 2021. Patients were divided into the Zercepac and reference trastuzumab groups. Reduction in tumor size, clinical response based on RECIST1.1 criteria, pathological complete response (pCR), and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to adjust confounders. A total of 105 patients were included in the study, among them, 65 were in the Zercepac group and 40 were in the reference trastuzumab group. The percentage of tumor shrinkage from baseline was comparable between the Zercepac and reference trastuzumab group (47.6 ± 18.6% vs. 43.0 ± 19.9%, p = 0.235). Clinical partial response rate was similar between the two groups (81.5% vs. 70.0%, p = 0.172). There were 28 cases of pCR (70.0%) in the reference trastuzumab group and 46 cases of pCR (70.8%) in the Zercepac group (p = 0.933). The choice of Zercepac or reference trastuzumab was not significantly associated with pCR (OR = 0.96, 95%CI: 0.41-2.28, p = 0.933). Adverse events (AEs) were observed in all patients, and the incidence of ≥3 grade AEs was comparable between the two groups (81.5% vs. 70.0%, p = 0.172). Zercepac has similar effectiveness and safety profile compared with reference trastuzumab in neoadjuvant therapy, which provides treatment options for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

HER2 Positive Breast Cancer Therapy - A Challenging and Continuously Moving Pathway – A Narrative Literature Review

Background: Alteration of the expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 gene as an oncogenic pathway in breast cancer was first explored in the 1980'. Since then, tremendous progress has been made in treating HER2-positive breast cancer. Methods: We performed a narrative type review of the existing literature using as a starting point the PubMed database, investigated by keywords, later the search being refined and the articles that we considered relevant were selected. The approach to the topic under discussion being variable in the various studies identified convinced us of the inappropriateness of a meta-analysis. As a secondary method of analysis, we evaluated the bibliography of each of the selected studies and from this we identified other publications of interest. Results: At present, there are three major classes of FDA-approved anti-HER2 agents: monoclonal antibodies (Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab and Margetuximab), TKIs (Lapatinib, Neratinib and Tucatinib) and antibody-drug conjugates (T-DM1 and T-DXd). The treatment of HER2+ breast cancer suffered some changes in the last few years. If in 2018, after progression under first-line treatment with taxane-trastuzumab/pertuzumab and second line with T-DM1 was a big challenge, being up to the oncologist to choose from lapatinib-capecitabine, trastuzumab-lapatinib or different chemotherapeutic agents, depending on toxicities and therapies available in the country, nowadays we have a new third- and fourth-line FDA approved standard, which consists of tucatinib-trastuzumab-capecitabine and trastuzumab-deruxtecan. Conclusion: Times are very exciting for HER2-positive disease. What differentiates novel therapies and if we do it better is both the question that we tried to give an answer to in this review of literature, but it remains at the same time a topic of discussion and a directive for analysis in the future, because we are only getting closer to an optimal version of treatment for HER2+ breast cancer, hoping that the introduction of new drugs and the establishment of new indications for old drugs will allow us to standardize the treatment of these patients.

Efficacy and safety of PI3K/Akt/mTOR inhibitors combined with trastuzumab therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer is associated with acquired resistance to trastuzumab. This randomized controlled trial (RCTs) meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of PI3K/Akt/mTOR inhibitors in combination with trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer. We searched on Web of Knowledge, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, CNKI, and ClinicalTrials.Gov for RCTs comparing PI3K/Akt/mTOR inhibitors plus trastuzumab vs. standard trastuzumab treatments. Pooled estimates of progression-free survival (PFS), pathologic complete response (pCR), and incidence of adverse events were determined. 5 studies out of 610 were found to be eligible and were included in our analysis (n=1,548 participants). PI3K/Akt/mTOR inhibitors combination with trastuzumab treatments resulted in a statistically significant increase in PFS compared with conventional trastuzumab therapy (HR 0.82; 95% CI: 0.76-0.90; p<0.00001). The new combination treatment was more effective on hormone receptor-negative patients (HR 0.73; 95% CI: 0.58-0.93; p=0.010). In addition, the combination of PI3K/Akt/mTOR inhibitors with trastuzumab slightly increased the risk of some adverse events, such as neutropenia, leukopenia, fatigue, and anemia. The combination treatments of PI3K/Akt/mTOR inhibitors and trastuzumab for PI3K/Akt/mTOR inhibitors combined with trastuzumab treatments for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer can improve median progression-free survival while increasing the incidence of adverse events. It is still controversial based on the current evidence. Due to the limited number and quality of included studies, more high-quality studies are needed for further analysis.

Pyrotinib Targeted EGFR-STAT3/CD24 Loop-Mediated Cell Viability in TSC.

Pyrotinib is an irreversible pan-ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, designed for the therapy of HER2-positive breast cancers. Inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR, HER family) efficiently and selectively suppresses the proliferation of human TSC2-deficient smooth muscle cells and reverses lung changes in LAM/TSC. Our pilot study indicated that pyrotinib dramatically restrained the vitality of TSC2-deficient cells compared to its limited impact on TSC2-expression cells. Pyrotinib induced G1-phase arrest and triggered apoptosis by blocking abnormally activated CD24 in TSC2-deficient cells. CD24 is not only an important immune checkpoint, but is also involved in the regulation of signaling pathways. Pyrotinib inhibited the nuclear import of pEGFR and restrained the pEGFR/pSTAT3 signals, which directly boosted the transcriptional expression of CD24 by binding to its promoter region. In reverse, CD24 enhanced pEGFR function by directly binding. Pyrotinib specifically targeted TSC2-deficient cells, inhibited tumor cell viability and induced apoptosis through EGFR-STAT3/CD24 Loop in vivo and in vitro. Thus, pyrotinib may be a promising new therapeutic drug for TSC treatment.

Prognostic Value of the Serum HER2 Extracellular Domain Level in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Simple SummaryWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the predictive value of the serum HER2 extracellular domain (sHER2 ECD) for breast cancer prognosis. Our review investigated 40 studies (12,229 patients) that assessed the impact of the sHER2 ECD levels on breast cancer prognosis and explored the clinical significance of sHER2 ECD levels in different treatment modalities. Our findings indicated that an elevated sHER2 was an unfavorable prognostic factor in breast cancer. More interestingly, sHER2 ECD was found to be a promising biomarker for predicting adverse clinical outcomes of trastuzumab-based treatment but did not affect the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In addition, the baseline cutoff value of sHER2 ECD in different treatment stages of breast cancer remains to be further explored. Overall, our study suggested that sHER2 ECD levels have important prognostic value in breast cancer and may be helpful for clinicians to select the appropriate anti-HER2 therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer, providing more evidence for guiding clinical practice.An elevated serum HER2 extracellular domain is associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer, but the relationship between sHER2 and the efficacy of different modalities remains controversial. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of serum HER2 extracellular domain (sHER2 ECD) in breast cancer and to identify its correlation with the efficacy of different treatment regimens. A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus databases was conducted to identify studies exploring the association between HER2 ECD level and clinical outcomes among patients with breast cancer. Using the random effects models, pooled hazard ratios (HRs), and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were calculated for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and the objective response rate (ORR). Heterogeneity was further evaluated by subgroup and sensitivity analysis. Overall, 40 studies comprising 12,229 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Elevated HER2 ECD levels were associated with worse PFS (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.40–2.17; p < 0.001), and this effect was observed in patients treated with chemotherapy (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.37–2.39; p < 0.001), endocrine therapy (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.57–2.32; p < 0.001), and trastuzumab (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.31–2.30; p < 0.001). However, this association was not present in patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (HR 1.44, 95% CI 0.85–2.43, p = 0.17). The HRs/ORs for an elevated HER2 ECD level for DFS, OS, and ORR were 2.73 (95% CI 2.17–3.42; p < 0.001), 2.13 (95% CI 1.77–2.57; p < 0.001), and 0.80 (95% CI 0.49–1.31; p = 0.381), respectively. An elevated sHER2 ECD was an unfavorable prognostic factor in breast cancer but did not affect the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as lapatinib. Detection of sHER2 ECD may be helpful for clinicians selecting the appropriate anti-HER2 therapy for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

Novel 2,6,9-Trisubstituted Purines as Potent CDK Inhibitors Alleviating Trastuzumab-Resistance of HER2-Positive Breast Cancers.

HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer is defined by HER2 oncogene amplification on chromosome 17q12 and accounts for 15–20% population of breast-cancer patients. Therapeutic anti-HER2 antibody such as trastuzumab is used as the first-line therapy for HER2-positive breast cancers. However, more than 50% of the patients respond poorly to trastuzumab, illustrating that novel therapy is warranted to overcome the resistance. We previously reported that in the majority of HER2+ breast-cancer patients, CDK12 is co-amplified on 17q12 and involved in developing tumors and trastuzumab resistance, proposing CDK12 as a potential drug target for HER2+ breast cancers. Here, we designed and synthesized novel 2,6,9-trisubstituted purines as potent CDK12 inhibitors showing strong, equipotent antiproliferative activity against trastuzumab-sensitive HER2+ SK-Br3 cells and trastuzumab-resistant HER2+ HCC1954 cells (GI50 values < 50 nM) both of which express a high level of CDK12. Two potent analogue 30d and 30e at 40, 200 nM greatly downregulated the levels of cyclinK and Pol II p-CTD (Ser2), as well as the expression of CDK12 downstream genes (IRS1 and WNT1) in a dose-dependent manner. We also observed structure-property relationship for a subset of potent analogues, and found that 30e is highly stable in liver microsomes with lack of CYP inhibition. In addition, 30d exhibited a synergy with trastuzumab in the both cells, suggesting that our inhibitors could be applied to alleviate trastuzumab-resistance of HER2+ breast cancers and escalate the efficacy of trastuzumab as well. Our study may provide insight into developing a novel therapy for HER2+ breast cancers.