After Napoleon: Political in Late Works. By Stephen Rumph. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004. [ix, 295 p. ISBN 0-520-23855-9. $45.] Index. Stephen Rumph's After Napoleon: Political in Late Works tackles vitally important topic: relation of music to its political context. The pieces that come under consideration include Third and Ninth Symphonies and Fidelia, as well as Egmont music, number of sonatas and quartets, some of Beethoven's patriotic songs and marches, and particularly his Battle 1813, Wellingtons Sieg. As author rightly states in his introduction, a political study of can scarcely be regarded as curiosity for interdisciplinary studies: it belongs squarely within musical criticism, alongside biography, sketch studies, and formal analysis (p. 1). Rumph frames his argument in relation to movement known as politische Romantik (political Romanticism) led by such figures as Schlegel brothers, Novalis, and Heinrich von Kleist. He emphasizes their grievances against French cultural hegemony and their virulent reaction to all things French and enlightened. This of political Romanticism, he claims, was no passing fad for Beethoven but exercised profound and enduring influence on his later (p. 5). There is scant documentation of Beethoven's connection to these writers, and although Rumph acknowledges that his study is speculative, he aims to convey 'new way of seeing' . . . [that] incarnates ideological in specifically musical structures (p. 8). In opening chapters of Rumph impressively draws upon aesthetic writings of Friedrich Schiller, writer whom admired. Schiller's notion of artistic activity as Spieltrieb (play drive) and his famous distinction between naive and sentimental poetry are explored. Emanuel Kant's theory of sublime serves as context for thoughtful comments on Beethoven's treatment of das Erhabene in his song Die Ehre Gottes aus der Natur, Gettert Songs, op. 48. Another influential writer who receives attention here is E. T. A. Hoffmann. Rumph is particularly interested in Hoffmann's famous critique of Fifth Symphony 1810, in which Beethoven's music is regarded as revealing unknown kingdom, that has nothing in common with outer sensory world (p. 9). Rumph's strategy is to invert Hoffmann's view. He seeks to show that Beethoven's late works represent kingdom that is very much of this world, one that actually reflects reactionary turn in politics of post-Napoleonic Europe. Such an argument has originality, and goes against grain of much scholarship. Rumph admits that the young embraced an ideological view diametrically opposed to ethos of political Romanticism (p. 35). Nonetheless, he sees decisive shift in Beethoven's attitude beginning in 1809, when Napoleon's armies besieged and occupied Vienna. Rumph finds that Beethoven's letters from 1809 to 1813 trace an unbroken arc of resentment, in which pins full blame for his economic vicissitudes on war with France (p. 96). Against this historical background, Rumph sets forth main point of [his] entire book, namely that the same ideology that shaped Beethoven's late style helped create Restoration (pp. 106-07). A key work to address in this context is surely Beethoven's only opera, Fidelia. Unfortunately, Rumph does not investigate thoroughly some aspects of opera that do not conform to his thesis. Fidelia is closely bound up with French models and Enlightenment ideals, and its extensive final revision took place in 1814, several years after Rumph sees as having renounced these principles. While he acknowledges that Leonore wears pants in this opera of conjugal love (p. 164), he does not recognize her full importance as symbol of liberty, which was enhanced unforgettably in section added to Florestan's aria in revision (a passage influenced in turn by Egmont's vision of Clarchen in Egmont music, 1810). …
Read full abstract