Observations of the concentration of both uncharged and total condensation‐nuclei were made at different times and places near Washington, using an Aitken nuclei‐counter in conjunction with a cylindrical, electrical condenser through which air was drawn at a desired rate by a spring‐driven turbine. The ratio (S) of the concentration of uncharged to that of all nuclei, serves as a measure of the relative magnitude of the coefficients of combination and those of attachment between small ions and charged and uncharged nuclei, respectively, provided the assumptions usually made in this connection are valid. Diverse values of S have been found heretofore when these were determined from the same data but by different methods. It is shown in the theory of least squares that the method of determining the best estimate of a quantity of this character depends upon the manner in which weights should be assigned to the data. It is shown here that the weight assigned to the observed number of particles falling on a square of the counter, should vary inversely as that number. The proper method of determining the best estimate of S, when weights are assigned in this manner, and also two other simpler methods were applied to these data. The surprisingly small differences in the three results, indicates these data are homogeneous.From 620 individual samples of both uncharged and total nuclei, S was found to be 0.75 with a standard error of 0.02. This value of S is distinctly greater than that reported for other places but it is in close agreement with values previously determined at Washington with other equipment. No significant evidence of a dependence of S, upon time, upon place, or upon concentration of nuclei, such as some observers report, is provided by these data. An examination of the standard deviation of S for a single sample indicates that the variations which do appear are no greater than those which are to be expected from random errors. Systematic errors in all measurements of this sort may arise from the adsorption of nuclei on the walls of the apparatus. The differences in the values of S found at the different places may in part be attributed to this source. Four hundred individual samples taken, both before and after the air passed through the condenser with no field applied, indicate that 0.85 of the nuclei which enter this condenser get through. The procedure followed here was such that errors in the calculated value of S from this source are eliminated provided charged and uncharged nuclei are adsorbed with equal facility.