ObjectivesThe terms 'accuracy' and 'precision' are tightly defined in color science but are often used ambiguously in dental research. This study introduces the visual instrument agreement scale (VIAS), a new method for determining visual-instrumental agreement in dental colorimetry by comparing visually perceived and measured color differences. Materials and MethodsIn-vivo tooth color measurements were taken from 16 participants using four intraoral scanners (Primescan, Medit i700, Carestream CS3700, Trios 3) and one spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade V). Visual shade assessment was also performed by one expert observer using the 3D Master shade guide. Statistical significance testing was conducted using the STRESS index to calculate VIAS, and the F-statistic was used to evaluate device performance. ResultsCarestream CS3700 achieved the highest visual-instrumental agreement with a VIAS score of 82%, performing significantly better than the other devices. Primescan, Medit i700, and Trios 3 showed scores of 76%, 75%, and 72%, respectively, with no significant differences between them. Vita Easyshade V scored 57%, performing significantly worse than the other devices. ConclusionsThe overall performance of the intraoral scanners was strong, with Carestream CS3700 approaching excellent performance. The VIAS method offers a practical, color science-based framework for evaluating visual-instrumental agreement and can be easily replicated using the freely available toolbox. Clinical SignificanceIntraoral scanners performed surprisingly better than a spectrophotometer specifically designed for tooth color measurement and which is often regarded as the gold standard. Additionally, VIAS offers a new, scientifically grounded approach for testing visual-instrumental agreement in dental colorimetry.
Read full abstract