Sperm Extraction Research Articles

Microsurgical Testicular Sperm Extraction: Predictive Factors and Outcomes for Men with Nonobstructive Azoospermia

Background. Nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) is a frequent cause of male infertility, and microsurgical testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) is an effective technique for sperm retrieval in NOA cases. However, the predictive factors for successful sperm retrieval and the outcomes of micro-TESE in NOA patients are not fully understood. Methods. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the predictive value of preoperative data and outcomes of micro-TESE in 172 men with NOA who underwent the procedure between April 2012 and February 2021. Patients’ age, medical history, testicular size, hormonal profile, testicular histology, and sperm retrieval were recorded. Results. 172 cases of micro-TESE were performed (99 unilateral and 73 bilateral) and testicular sperm retrieval rate (SRR) was 72.7%. There was no statistical difference in age, testicular size, and hormonal profiles between positive SRR and negative SRR groups. Clinical varicocele and previous orchitis did not significantly affect the result of micro-TESE. Y chromosome microdeletions were detected in seven patients. On histological examination, hypospermatogenesis was found in 39% of patients who underwent testicular biopsy. SRR was higher in patients with hypospermatogenesis than in other groups. Conclusions. Testicular microdissection is an effective and safe procedure for nonobstructive azoospermia patients, regardless of the different etiologies and preoperative data. Age, testicular size, and hormonal levels did not predict the success of micro-TESE. The presence of hypospermatogenesis was associated with a higher SRR. Clinical varicocele and previous orchitis were not significantly associated with the outcome of micro-TESE.

Timing of Testicular Biopsy in Relation to Oocyte Retrieval and the Outcomes of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection.

We evaluate microscopic (micro) testicular sperm extraction (TESE) timing relative to oocyte retrieval on intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome. Couples with nonobstructive azoospermia who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection with freshly retrieved spermatozoa were analyzed based on whether micro-TESE was performed at least 1 day prior to oocyte retrieval (TESE-day-before group) or on the day of oocyte retrieval (TESE-day-of group). Embryology and clinical outcomes were compared. The percentage of patients who underwent a successful testicular sperm retrieval was significantly lower in the TESE-day-before cohort (62%) than in the TESE-day-of cohort (69%; odds ratio [OR] 1.4, 95% CI [1.1, 1.7], P < .001). The fertilization rate was also found to be significantly lower in the TESE-day-before group (45%) than in the TESE-day-of group (53%; OR 1.4, 95% CI [1.2, 1.7], P = .01). Although the association between the cleavage rate and TESE timing was not statistically significant, the implantation rate was found to be significantly higher in the day-before cohort (28%) than in the day-of cohort (22%; OR 0.7, 95% CI [0.6, 0.9], P = .01). Nevertheless, it was found that the clinical pregnancy and delivery rates were not statistically significantly associated with the TESE timing. Although sperm retrieval and fertilization rates were lower in the TESE-day-before cohort, the 2 cohorts showed comparable embryologic and clinical outcomes. Micro-TESE can be performed before oocyte harvesting to provide physicians ample time to decide between cancelling oocyte retrieval or retrieving oocytes for cryopreservation.

A novel sorting method for the enrichment of early human spermatocytes from clinical biopsies

To determine if early spermatocytes can be enriched from a human testis biopsy using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Potential surface markers for early spermatocytes were identified using bioinformatics analysis of single-cell RNA-sequenced human testis tissue. Testicular sperm extraction samples from three participants with normal spermatogenesis were digested into single-cell suspensions and cryopreserved. Two to four million cells were obtained from each and sorted by FACS as separate biologic replicates using antibodies for the identified surface markers. A portion from each biopsy remained unsorted to serve as controls. The sorted cells were then characterized for enrichment of early spermatocytes. A laboratory study. Three men with a diagnosis of obstructive azoospermia (age range, 30-40 years). None. Sorted cells were characterized for RNA expression of markers encompassing the stages of spermatogenesis. Sorting markers were validated by their reactivity on human testis formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. Serine protease 50 (TSP50) and SWI5-dependent homologous recombination repair protein 1 were identified as potential surface proteins specific for early spermatocytes. After FACS sorting, the TSP50-sorted populations accounted for 1.6%-8.9% of total populations and exhibited the greatest average-fold increases in RNA expression for the premeiotic marker stimulated by retinoic acid (STRA8), by 23-fold. Immunohistochemistry showed the staining pattern for TSP50 to be strong in premeiotic undifferentiated embryonic cell transcription factor 1-/doublesex and Mab-3 related transcription factor 1-/STRA8+ spermatogonia as well as SYCP3+/protamine 2- spermatocytes. This work shows that TSP50 can be used to enrich early STRA8-expressing spermatocytes from human testicular biopsies, providing a means for targeted single-cell RNA sequencing analysis and invitro functional interrogation of germ cells during the onset of meiosis. This could enable investigation into details of the regulatory pathways underlying this critical stage of spermatogenesis, previously difficult to enrich from whole tissue samples.

A step closer to parenthood with non-obstructive azoospermia: Unveiling the impact of microdissection testicular sperm extraction in Australia's largest single-centre study.

Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) diagnosis poses challenges for couples seeking parenthood. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (MD-TESE) excels in retrieving testicular sperm cells for NOA cases. However, limited live birth data in Australian NOA patients hinders accurate counselling. This study aimed to determine the likelihood of infertile couples with a male partner diagnosed with NOA conceiving biological children using MD-TESE / intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). A retrospective cohort study included 108 NOA men treated at a public fertility unit and a private fertility centre (May 2009-May 2022). live birth rate (LBR); secondary outcomes: sperm retrieval rate, pregnancy rate, and neonatal outcomes. Among 108 patients undergoing MD-TESE, the positive sperm retrieval rate (PSRR) was 64.8% (70/108). Histology best predicted sperm retrieval success, with hypo-spermatogenesis yielding a 94.1% PSRR. Age, testicular volume, and hormonal parameters had no significant impact. Mean male age: 35.4 years; mean partner age: 32.7 years. Fertilisation rate: 50.7%. LBR per initiated cycle: 58.7% (37/63); per embryo transfer: 63.8% (37/58); per initially diagnosed NOA man: 34.3% (37/108). Cumulative LBR: 74.1% (43/58); twin rate: 10.8% (4/37). No neonatal deaths or defects were observed among 47 live offspring. This study provides valuable data for counselling NOA couples on the probability of conceiving biological offspring. MD-TESE and ICSI yielded favourable PSRR (64.8%) and LBR (63.8%). However, couples should be aware that once NOA is confirmed, the chance of taking home a baby is 34%.

Testicular volume is a noninvasive predictor of sperm retrieval failure in idiopathic nonobstructive azoospermia.

We investigated the prognostic importance of noninvasive factors in predicting sperm retrieval failure in idiopathic nonobstructive azoospermia (iNOA). We studied 193 patients with nonobstructive azoospermia who underwent microsurgical testicular sperm extraction. The Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U tests for clinical parameters and seminiferous tubule distribution were used for between-group comparisons. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify predictors of retrieval failure. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for each variable was evaluated, and the net clinical benefit was calculated using a clinical decision curve. Patients with iNOA had a lower sperm retrieval rate than those with known causes. Moreover, testicular volume was an independent factor affecting sperm extraction outcomes (odds ratio = 0.79, P < 0.05). The testicular volume cut-off value was 6.5 ml (area under the curve: 0.694). The patients with iNOA were categorized into two groups on the basis of the distribution of seminiferous tubules observed. The sperm retrieval rate and testicular volume were significantly different between the groups with a uniform or heterogeneous tubule distribution. There was also a significant association between a uniform tubule distribution and testicular volume. In conclusion, a testicular volume of more than 6.5 ml effectively predicts microsurgical testicular sperm extraction failure due to a uniform tubule distribution in patients with iNOA.

Ex vivo microscopic testicular sperm extraction at the time of radical orchiectomy in men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA): a scoping review.

Testicular tumor is the most common solid malignancy in males under 40 years of age. This malignancy is known to have a negative impact on male fertility. Therefore, several techniques for sperm retrieval have been proposed, including microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE). The objective of this study was to review the literature on the outcomes of oncological (Onco)-mTESE at the time of radical orchiectomy. We conducted a comprehensive literature search through PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Controlled Register of Trials. Only studies reporting ex vivo mTESE in patients with testicular tumor were considered. Twelve papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Tumor size was identified as the sole preoperative factor influencing spermatogenesis. The considered studies demonstrated a satisfactory success rate for Onco-mTESE, associated with a similarly valid percentage of live healthy births through assisted reproductive technology. Currently, no comparison has been made between Onco-mTESE and conventional Onco-TESE, hence further assessment is required. In cases where the tumor completely replaces the cancer-bearing testicle, a contralateral micro-TESE may be a viable alternative. However, the surgeon should evaluate associated risks and benefits preoperatively. In conclusion, Onco-mTESE at the time of radical orchiectomy appears to be a promising therapeutic option for young patients with testicular tumors. Nevertheless, additional studies are necessary to achieve a definitive conclusion.

(193) Bilateral Onco-TESE and Placement of Bilateral Testicular Prostheses

Abstract Introduction Here we present the case of a 36-year-old male who underwent bilateral Onco-TESE (oncologic testicular sperm extraction) and insertion of bilateral testicular prostheses in the setting of bilateral testicular masses and refractor testicular pain. Preoperative evaluation revealed the presence of non-obstructive azoospermia and Klinefelter syndrome. Objective To demonstrate the effectiveness and feasibility of bilateral Onco-TESE as a therapeutic option for the patient with bilateral testicular masses, refractory bilateral testicular pain, non-obstructive azoospermia, and Klinefelter syndrome while attempting to preserve future fertility. Methods A comprehensive diagnostic workup was performed preoperatively including physical examination, scrotal ultrasound, hormonal evaluation, semen analysis, and genetic testing. Informed consent for the procedure and its filming was obtained from the patient prior to undergoing bilateral Onco-TESE and insertion of bilateral testicular prostheses. Results Pathologic analysis of testicular masses revealed Multinodular Leydig cell hyperplasia. The extracted testicular tissue yielded no viable sperm. The patient’s testicular pain resolved after the immediate postoperative period with an excellent cosmetic result. Conclusions This case presentation highlights a unique indication for bilateral Onco-TESE and insertion of bilateral testicular prostheses in a patient with bilateral testicular masses, bilateral testicular pain, Klinefelter syndrome, and desired future fertility. Disclosure No.

The habits of European urologists in the field of cryopreservation before the urological cancers treatment.

Treatments against urogenital cancers frequently have fertility side-effects. The strategy to preserve fertility after oncologic treatments is still a matter of debate with a lack of evidence and international guidelines. The aim of this study is to investigate fertility preservation practices before urogenital cancer treatments and to compare national habits. An online anonymous survey was submitted from January to June 2021 to six European urological societies. The 31-items questionnaire included questions about demography, habits of evaluation, and management of fertility preservation in case of urogenital cancer treatments. Two hundred twenty-eight urologists from six urological societies in five different countries (Belgium, The Netherlands, Luxembourg, France, Finland) filled out the survey. Three quarter (74%; n=166) usually propose a cryopreservation before orchidectomy. In case of oligo/azoo-spermia, the technique performed for the sperm extraction during orchidectomy varies among the sample: 70.5% (n=160) of the responders do not perform a Testicular Sperm Extraction (TESE) nor a Percutaneous Epididymal Sperm Aspiration (PESA). The cryopreservation for prostate cancer treatments is never proposed in 48.17% (n=105) of responders but conversely it is always proposed in 5.05% (n=11). The cryopreservation before bladder cancer treatments is not commonly proposed (67.5%, n=154). Our study showed variable country specific tendencies in terms of fertility preservation in the period of treatment of urological cancers. These differences seem to be related to national guidelines recommendations. Standardization of international guidelines is urgently needed in the field of fertility for urological cancer patients.

Rate of testicular histology failure in predicting successful testicular sperm extraction.

The management of Non-Obstructive (NOA) Azoospermia or Obstructive Azoospermia (OA) patients relies on testicular sperm extraction (TESE) followed by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). In NOA patients the sperm recovery is successful in only 50% of cases and therefore the ability to predict those patients with a high probability of achieving a successful sperm retrieval would be a great value in counselling the patient and his partner. Several studies tried to suggest predictors of a positive TESE (e.g. FSH concentration), but most concluded that diagnostic testicular biopsy (histology) is best. This is a retrospective analysis of 526 TESE patients. After the extraction of the testis, the resulting sample was immediately given to the embryologist, who examined the tubules for sperm cryopreservation. During the same procedure, a different specimen was destined to the histological analysis. The comparison between the two methodological approaches was carried out through a score. Concordance between TESE and testicular histology outcomes was found in 70,7% of patients; discordance was found in 29,3% of patients. Among the discordance outcomes, in approximately 95% we found at least 1 sperm in the TESE retrieval, while the histology report did not find any spermatozoa or found not enough compared to our evaluation; in only 5% of cases we did not find any spermatozoa or found not enough compared to what was detected in the testicular histology. Based on our experience, to increase diagnostic accuracy, a larger biopsy should be sent to the histopathology laboratory; another option may be to use TESE cell suspension (the same embryologists employ for cryopreservation) for cytological evaluation of spermatogenesis.

Micromapping testicular sperm extraction: A new technique for microscopic testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia.

In microscopic testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) for nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA), sperm can be recovered relatively easily in some cases, and mTESE may be retrospectively considered excessive. However, mTESE is routinely performed in the majority of NOA patients because of the difficulty in predicting tissue status. A minimally invasive and comprehensive sperm retrieval method that allows on-the-spot tissue assessment is needed. We have developed and evaluated a novel sperm retrieval technique for NOA called micromapping testicular sperm extraction (MMTSE). MMTSE involves dividing the testis into four sections and making multiple small needle holes in the tunica albuginea to extract seminiferous tubules and retrieve sperm. The sperm-positive group by MMTSE (Group I) underwent additional tissue collection (ATC) via a small incision, whereas the sperm-negative group by MMTSE (Group 0) underwent mTESE. In total, 40 NOA participants underwent MMTSE. Group I included 15 patients and Group 0 included 25 patients. In Group 1, sperm were recovered from all patients by ATC. In Group 0, sperm were recovered in 4 of 25 cases using mTESE. MMTSE shows promise as a simple method that comprehensively searches testicular tissue and retrieves sperm using an appropriate method while minimizing patient burden.

Comparison of sperm retrieval rate between superficial and deep dissection during microscopic testicular sperm extraction.

The purpose of the study was to compare the outcome of microscopic testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) between superficial and deep dissection on the same testicle in terms of sperm retrieval rate (SRR). In a retrospective study from June 2019 to October 2021, 44 patients with nonobstructive azoospermia who underwent micro-TESE with positive results (mature sperm identified) were included. Eight patients were excluded from the study due to deficient documentation on superficial and deep dissection. A total of 36 patients were included; 60 testicles were examined for superficial and deep biopsies. Testicular histopathology was performed in all patients, and a hormonal evaluation was obtained before the micro-TESE attempt. Thirty-six patients and 60 testicles were included in the study. Of them, 47 (78.3%) testicles had positive results. Superficial TESE was positive in 38 (63.3%) testicles, and deep TESE was successful in 45 (75.0%) testicles. An improvement of 13.9% in the SRR was observed, following deep dissection. However, there was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.166). Rates of positive sperm retrieval (from any side) did not differ significantly based on patients' age, microdissection testicular sperm extraction sides, and hormonal concentrations; these differences were not apparent after superficial or deep TESE. The presented findings suggest that although successful SRRs of deep TESE were higher than that of its superficial counterpart, there was no significant statistical difference. A larger body of evidence is needed to provide a higher grade of recommendation.

Changes in Testosterone Levels Following Surgical Sperm Retrieval in Men with Non-Obstructive Azoospermia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Surgical sperm retrieval (SSR) is used to extract spermatozoa for use with intracytoplasmic sperm injection in men with obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). The procedure may lead to segmental devascularization, postoperative fibrosis, and atrophy with a subsequent decrease in testosterone. The aim of the study is to investigate the impact of SSR on serum levels of total testosterone (TT), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) testicular volume, and sexual function in infertile azoospermic men. In this systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA), we searched articles in "PubMed" and "Scopus" exploring the impact of SSR on TT, FSH, LH, and testicular volume. The full-text articles were screened to assess eligibility before data extraction, quality assessment, and meta-analysis. Seventeen studies meeting the inclusion criteria were finally analyzed and included 1,685 infertile, azoospermic men. Patients underwent SSR and were followed in the postoperative period (one week to 32 months). The analysis showed a significant reduction in TT (mean difference [MD] 3.81 nmol/L, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55:7.06; p=0.02) compared to pre-SSR values. We also observed insignificant differences in serum FSH (MD 5.08 IU/L, 95% CI -5.6:15.8; p=0.35), LH (MD -2.96 IU/L, 95% CI -6.31:0.39; p=0.08), and no change in testicular volume (MD 0.07 mL, 95% CI -1.92:2.07; p=0.94) after SSR. Sexual dysfunction was associated with hypogonadism, depression, and anxiety, especially in men with unsuccessful SSR and Klinefelter syndrome. The results of this SRMA indicate a significant reduction in TT after SSR. Sexual dysfunction after testicular sperm extraction and the potential negative impact of future SSR repeat should be considered during preoperative counseling.

Clinical value of stepwise microsurgical resection of testicular tumors combined with sperm extraction in the treatment of spermatogenic failure

Clinical value of stepwise microsurgical resection of testicular tumors combined with sperm extraction in the treatment of spermatogenic failure

Differences in clinical outcomes between men with mosaic Klinefelter syndrome and those with non-mosaic Klinefelter syndrome.

This study compared the clinical outcomes of men with Klinfelter syndrome based on karyotype. The authors analyzed the outcomes of microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) performed on 57 patients with Klinfelter syndrome (KS) at our clinic. The average ages of the non-mosaic and mosaic KS groups were 32.2 ± 4.8 and 45.9 ± 13.1 years, respectively. The sperm retrieval rates of the non-mosaic and mosaic KS groups were 46.5% (20/43) and 50.0% (7/14), respectively. The fertilization rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection did not significantly differ between the non-mosaic and mosaic KS groups. The mosaic KS group had higher cleavage and blastocyst development rates than the non-mosaic KS group (72.2% vs. 96.2% and 30.5% vs. 44.7%, respectively). The group using motile sperm had better outcomes than the group using immotile sperm. The embryo transfer outcomes of the non-mosaic and mosaic KS groups did not significantly differ (clinical pregnancy rate: 28.0% vs. 20.7%, miscarriage rate: 14.3% vs. 33.3%, production rate per transfer: 22.0% vs. 13.8%, and production rate per case: 58.8% vs. 57.1%). Compared with the non-mosaic KS group, the mosaic KS group had significantly better intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes because of the higher utilization rate of motile sperm.

Investigating discordance between embryologists and histopathologists: analysis of multiple factors in mTESE sperm retrieval outcomes.

The objective of the study is to primarily highlight the consistency between the embryologist and the histopathologist in microdissection testicular sperm extraction and to explore the factors affecting sperm retrieval. The research included 91 patients, aged 20 to 47, who visited our Reproductive Technology center from July 2020 to June 2023. Patient data were collected retrospectively, including demographics, physical exams, lab tests, radiological assessments, genetic analyses, medical histories and histopathological results. Using the Johnsen scoring system for evaluation, the histopathologist identified mature spermatozoa in the specimen in some patients (Johnsen score 8-10); however, the embryologist only declared successful sperm retrieval in 66.6% of them. Overall sperm retrieval rates were lower than expected at 40%. Significant factors influencing sperm retrieval rates included Follicle Stimulating Hormone (p = 0.001), Luteinizing Hormone (p = 0.007), testicular volume (p < 0.001), histopathology (p < 0.001), and alcohol consumption (p = 0.007). A logistic regression model was used to identify the independent predictors of successful sperm retrieval. FSH (p = 0.038), testicular volume (p < 0.001), histopathology (p < 0.001), and alcohol consumption (p = 0.013) emerged as significant predictive factors for the outcome of sperm retrieval. As a result, in addition to patient-related factors, the consistency between the pathologist and embryologist also affects sperm retrieval rates.

An integrative prediction model of successful sperm retrieval for men with non-obstructive azoospermia.

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) is an efficient method for obtaining spermatozoa from patients with non-obstructive azoospermia, but the overall success rate of this surgery is only approximately one-third. This study aimed to construct an integrative prediction model for andrologists to assess the preoperative success retrieval rate. A total of 217 patients diagnosed with non-obstructive azoospermia at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were included, in whom sperm was successfully retrieved in 71 patients. We retrospectively analyzed their clinical characteristics and pathological features. Single factor analysis and logistic regression analysis were utilized to validate the predictive performance, and the area under the curve (AUC) analysis was conducted to further assess the clinical diagnostic value of the model. The results showed that a history of Klinefelter syndrome or cryptorchidism, FSH (Follicle Stimulating Hormone) levels, and testicular pathology contributed differently to the nomogram prediction model. Relatively normal FSH levels, a history of Klinefelter syndrome or cryptorchidism, and favorable testicular pathological types were assigned higher scores, with higher scores often accompanying a preferable success rate of sperm retrieval. The integrated model showed good prediction performance, with an AUC (Area Under the Curve) of 0.781 (95% CI (confidence interval) 0.713-0.849). Overall, our integrative model demonstrates excellent prediction performance and may assist andrologists in balancing the benefits of surgery preoperatively.

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermic patients with solitary testis: a retrospective case-control study.

Obtaining sperm from the testis surgically and using these sperm with the intracytoplasmic sperm injection technique, has opened the way for the possibility of biological fathering in men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). We aimed to evaluate our sperm retrieval rate (SRR) by microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in NOA patients with solitary testis. In this retrospective case-control study, fortyfive patients with NOA who had a congenital or acquired solitary testis were included, between September 2003 and January 2022. These patients were randomly matched with patients with NOA who had bilateral testes, using a 1:3 matching ratio. We found that SRR by micro-TESE in patients with solitary testis was similar to NOA patients with bilateral testis (51.1% vs. 50.4%). Age, infertility period, ejaculate volume, serum levels of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone, history of varicocelectomy, history of orchiopexy, testicular stimulation therapy before micro-TESE, testicular volume, genetic status, TESE side, micro-TESE success, complications and histopathological evaluation results of both groups were evaluated, there was a statistically significant difference in only serum FSH and LH levels. There was no difference between the groups in terms of complications and hormonal effects in the early postoperative period. Micro-TESE in NOA patients with solitary testis has similar sperm retrieval and complication rates as NOA patients with bilateral testis.

Effectiveness of, and Satisfaction with, a Microsurgical Testicular Sperm Extraction Knowledge and Skills Masterclass for a World-Wide Audience.

This is the first study to assess the impact of an online microsurgical testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) masterclass. We: 1) describe the masterclass's scientific content; 2) appraise the participants' acquisition of knowledge; 3) gauge whether the extent of improvement of the participants' knowledge/skills was influenced by demographic/professional attributes; and 4) evaluate the participants' satisfaction. This masterclass comprised five didactic lectures followed by 4 case discussions. Online surveys assessed the above objectives using a baseline questionnaire including demographics and past mTESE experience/training, a 24-question pre- and post-quiz, and a satisfaction questionnaire. Participants were between 20-70 years old, with 80.37% males, mainly from Asia, Africa, and Europe, from clinical backgrounds (69.3%), and in public practice (64.4%). Half the sample reported no past mTESE training and very low skills, ≈60% wanted considerably more training, and 50% felt that good training was not readily available. Satisfaction was 98% to >99%. Pre- and post-quiz comparisons confirmed remarkable improvements in knowledge/skills, exhibiting five striking characteristics. Improvements were a) Broad i.e., across 19 of the 24 mTESE questions; b) Deep, of magnitude, as pre-/post-quiz scores improved from mean 13.71±4.13 to 17.06±4.73; c) Highly significant, consistently with p-values <0.001; d) Inclusive i.e., all participants enhanced their mTESE knowledge/skills regardless of demographic/professional attributes; and, e) Differential, e.g., non-clinical/clinical participants improved, but the former improved relatively significantly more, those with ≤5-year experience improved significantly more than those with >5-year, those in public practice significantly more than private practice participants, and those with lower self-rating in performing mTESE significantly more than those with higher self-rating. The masterclass was successful with very high satisfaction levels, and markedly improved mTESE knowledge/skills among the participants. Global Andrology Forum's model can be adopted by organizations with similar goals. Future research needs to evaluate such training to develop a practically non-existent evidence base.

Non-obstrüktif azospermiye güncel yaklaşım

Infertility affects 1 in 6 couples and male factor infertility is the cause in 50% of cases. Azoospermia is defined as the absence of spermatozoa in the ejaculate and is considered the most extreme form of male factor infertility. In the past, these men were considered infertile, but with the advent of testicular sperm extraction and assisted reproductive technologies, men with azoospermia can biologically father their own children. Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) occurs when there is a defect in spermatogenesis. This review describes the contemporary management of NOA and discusses the role of hormone stimulation therapy, surgical and embryological factors, and new technologies such as proteomics, genomics and artificial intelligence systems in the diagnosis and treatment of men with NOA. We also emphasise that men with NOA represent a vulnerable population at high risk of developing cancer and cardiovascular comorbidities. Keywords: azoospermia, non-obstructive azoospermia, infertility, hypogonadism

Global Practice Patterns and Variations in the Medical and Surgical Management of Non-Obstructive Azoospermia: Results of a World-Wide Survey, Guidelines and Expert Recommendations.

Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is a common, but complex problem, with multiple therapeutic options and a lack of clear guidelines. Hence, there is considerable controversy and marked variation in the management of NOA. This survey evaluates contemporary global practices related to medical and surgical management for patients with NOA. A 56-question online survey covering various aspects of the evaluation and management of NOA was sent to specialists around the globe. This paper analyzes the results of the second half of the survey dealing with the management of NOA. Results have been compared to current guidelines, and expert recommendations have been provided using a Delphi process. Participants from 49 countries submitted 336 valid responses. Hormonal therapy for 3 to 6 months was suggested before surgical sperm retrieval (SSR) by 29.6% and 23.6% of participants for normogonadotropic hypogonadism and hypergonadotropic hypogonadism respectively. The SSR rate was reported as 50.0% by 26.0% to 50.0% of participants. Interestingly, 46.0% reported successful SSR in <10% of men with Klinefelter syndrome and 41.3% routinely recommended preimplantation genetic testing. Varicocele repair prior to SSR is recommended by 57.7%. Half of the respondents (57.4%) reported using ultrasound to identify the most vascularized areas in the testis for SSR. One-third proceed directly to microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) in every case of NOA while others use a staged approach. After a failed conventional TESE, 23.8% wait for 3 months, while 33.1% wait for 6 months before proceeding to mTESE. The cut-off of follicle-stimulating hormone for positive SSR was reported to be 12-19 IU/mL by 22.5% of participants and 20-40 IU/mL by 27.8%, while 31.8% reported no upper limit. This is the largest survey to date on the real-world medical and surgical management of NOA by reproductive experts. It demonstrates a diverse practice pattern and highlights the need for evidence-based international consensus guidelines.