Objective: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of two surgical approaches, laparoscopic-assisted scrotal incision and conventional inguinal-scrotal incision, for treating cryptorchidism with unobliterated processus vaginalis. Methods: Clinical data from 60 pediatric patients with inguinal cryptorchidism who were admitted to our institution between January 2018 and January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Depending on the surgical technique used, the patients were split into two groups: the laparoscopic group (n = 30) underwent a laparoscopic-assisted scrotal incision, whereas the conventional group (n = 30) underwent a conventional inguinal-scrotal incision for testicular descent and fixation. The length of the procedure, intraoperative blood loss, and the typical hospital stay following the procedure were compared between the two groups. Also assessed was the frequency of postoperative complications including wound infection and hematoma development. Results: The laparoscopic group demonstrated a notably shortened average surgical duration compared with the traditional group, and this discrepancy held statistical significance (P = .017). Moreover, the laparoscopic approach resulted in a reduced volume of intraoperative blood loss, with a statistically significant distinction (P = .002), along with a decreased average length of hospital stay after surgery, also statistically significant (P = .009). Testicular retraction, atrophy, inguinal hernias, or hydrocele were not present in any group. Although the difference between the laparoscopic and open groups was not statistically significant (P > .05), the laparoscopic group saw a reduced frequency of scrotal hematoma. The frequency of wound infection was also decreased in the laparoscopic group compared with the open group, although there was no statistically significant difference (P > .05). Conclusion: The laparoscopic-assisted scrotal incision approach for testicular descent and fixation offers precise localization of cryptorchidism, reduced surgical trauma, shorter postoperative recovery time, and results in smaller scars with minimal tissue damage. The procedure showcases enhanced overall clinical effectiveness, fewer postoperative complications, heightened safety, and superior cosmetic outcomes.