RationaleEosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has been rarely recognized in Hispanics. Our goal is to describe the clinical characteristics, skin prick test (SPT) and food atopy patch test (APT) results in a Puerto Rican pediatric population with EoE.MethodsA retrospective analysis of all pediatric patients with EoE seen at the Allergy/Immunology Clinics of the University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine between July 2012 and June 2013.ResultsThirty six patients (age 0.8-18 years) with biopsied-confirmed EoE were identified. Seventy one percent were males. Most were atopic (91.4%). Allergic rhinitis was the most frequent diagnosis (83.3%) and dust mite was the most common sensitivity (83.3%). EoE symptoms included abdominal pain, emesis, dysphagia, and nauseas (56.3%, 56.3%, 46.8%, and 43.7% respectively). Food SPT was positive in 88.9% of cases. Egg, milk, oat, and corn (44.4%, 29.6%, 25.9%, and 25.9% respectively) were the most prevalent positives. APTs were positive in 88.9%. Wheat, beef, and chicken (41.7%, 36.1%, and 36.1% respectively) were the most prevalent positives. There was an association between SPT oat (RR = 0.43) with eosinophil counts in esophageal biopsy, unlike APT wheat (RR = -0.28), chicken (RR = -0.19) and beef (RR = -0.10).ConclusionsThis is the first study to describe results of both food SPT and APT in a Hispanic EoE pediatric population. APT results differed from other published cohorts. Dietary, gut microbial flora and host immune factors may explain these differences. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate efficiency of combining these testing methods in directing successful dietary elimination. RationaleEosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has been rarely recognized in Hispanics. Our goal is to describe the clinical characteristics, skin prick test (SPT) and food atopy patch test (APT) results in a Puerto Rican pediatric population with EoE. Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has been rarely recognized in Hispanics. Our goal is to describe the clinical characteristics, skin prick test (SPT) and food atopy patch test (APT) results in a Puerto Rican pediatric population with EoE. MethodsA retrospective analysis of all pediatric patients with EoE seen at the Allergy/Immunology Clinics of the University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine between July 2012 and June 2013. A retrospective analysis of all pediatric patients with EoE seen at the Allergy/Immunology Clinics of the University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine between July 2012 and June 2013. ResultsThirty six patients (age 0.8-18 years) with biopsied-confirmed EoE were identified. Seventy one percent were males. Most were atopic (91.4%). Allergic rhinitis was the most frequent diagnosis (83.3%) and dust mite was the most common sensitivity (83.3%). EoE symptoms included abdominal pain, emesis, dysphagia, and nauseas (56.3%, 56.3%, 46.8%, and 43.7% respectively). Food SPT was positive in 88.9% of cases. Egg, milk, oat, and corn (44.4%, 29.6%, 25.9%, and 25.9% respectively) were the most prevalent positives. APTs were positive in 88.9%. Wheat, beef, and chicken (41.7%, 36.1%, and 36.1% respectively) were the most prevalent positives. There was an association between SPT oat (RR = 0.43) with eosinophil counts in esophageal biopsy, unlike APT wheat (RR = -0.28), chicken (RR = -0.19) and beef (RR = -0.10). Thirty six patients (age 0.8-18 years) with biopsied-confirmed EoE were identified. Seventy one percent were males. Most were atopic (91.4%). Allergic rhinitis was the most frequent diagnosis (83.3%) and dust mite was the most common sensitivity (83.3%). EoE symptoms included abdominal pain, emesis, dysphagia, and nauseas (56.3%, 56.3%, 46.8%, and 43.7% respectively). Food SPT was positive in 88.9% of cases. Egg, milk, oat, and corn (44.4%, 29.6%, 25.9%, and 25.9% respectively) were the most prevalent positives. APTs were positive in 88.9%. Wheat, beef, and chicken (41.7%, 36.1%, and 36.1% respectively) were the most prevalent positives. There was an association between SPT oat (RR = 0.43) with eosinophil counts in esophageal biopsy, unlike APT wheat (RR = -0.28), chicken (RR = -0.19) and beef (RR = -0.10). ConclusionsThis is the first study to describe results of both food SPT and APT in a Hispanic EoE pediatric population. APT results differed from other published cohorts. Dietary, gut microbial flora and host immune factors may explain these differences. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate efficiency of combining these testing methods in directing successful dietary elimination. This is the first study to describe results of both food SPT and APT in a Hispanic EoE pediatric population. APT results differed from other published cohorts. Dietary, gut microbial flora and host immune factors may explain these differences. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate efficiency of combining these testing methods in directing successful dietary elimination.