FOUR short papers on Huxley appear in the Fortnightly Review. The Hon. G. C. Brodrick, Warden of Merton College, Oxford, records some personal reminiscences of the man whose loss is so keenly felt. It appears that about thirty-seven years ago, when a Linacre Professorship of Physiology, coupled with Human and Comparative Anatomy, was founded, Huxley meditated becoming a candidate for the chair. Before the election took place, however he made up his mind not to seek the office, which was awarded to the late Prof. Rolleston. The reason he assigned was that his opinions were too little in harmony with those prevalent at Oxford. This opinion he again gave, but with diminished emphasis, when he was asked, twenty years later, to accept the chair, upon the death of Prof. Rolleston. His work for the advancement of anthropology forms the subject of a note by Prof. E. B. Tylor. “Close upon the end of his life,” says Prof. Tylor, “Huxley did his best to promote the scheme to make anthropology at Oxford an examination subject for an Honours degree in Natural Science. Writing to me, he said, “If I know anything about the matter, anthropology is good as knowledge, and good as discipline.’ But Convocation thought he did not, ‘know any thing about the matter,’ and threw out the proposed statute.” Huxley's career as biologist is sketched by “A Student of Science.” The following is worth quoting from that contribution. “It was characteristic of the Professor's general mental attitude that mere novelty never affrighted him. When Ramsay propounded his theory of the excavation of lake basins by glacial action, Huxley supported it, even against the opposition of Lyell and Falconer. Suppose St. Paul's Cathedral removed from its present site to any part of the North Sea, the English Channel, or the Irish Sea, and the whole dome would be clear out of water. Place it, on the other hand, on the flow of Loch Lomond, and the largest ship in the British Navy might float safely over the golden ball, for the Loch has a maximum depth of 630 feet. Sir Andrew Ramsay's theory explains a striking fact like this, and affords undoubtedly a rational explanation of many similar phenomena.” The fourth of the papers treats of Huxley as philosopher, and is by Mr. W. L. Courtney, the editor of the Fortnightly. Under the title “The Spectroscope in Recent Chemistry,” Mr. R. A. Gregory contributes to the same review a brief history of the discovery of argon and helium, and discusses the many interesting points raised by the advent of those two new terrestrial elements, especially with reference to their spectra. It is worthy of contemplation that, so far as instrumental possibilities go, both argon and helium could have been discovered spectroscopically many years ago, and Lord Rayleigh would have been saved his years of tantalising experimentation. And yet there are some who think that the spectroscope will not help much more in the extension of natural knowledge !