Terms Of Surgical Time Research Articles

Infections in primary total ankle replacement: Anterior approach versus lateral transfibular approach

BackgroundTotal ankle replacement (TAR) represents an alternative to fusion for the treatment of end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. The aim of the present study was to retrospectively assess the frequency of infections between TARs with anterior and lateral transfibular approach at 12-months follow-up. Methods81 TARs through an anterior approach and 69 TARs through a lateral approach were performed between May 2011 and July 2015. We compared surgical time and tourniquet time, as well as superficial and deep infections frequency during the first 12 postoperative months. ResultsIn the anterior approach group, there were 3 (3.7%) deep infections and 4 (4.9%) superficial wound infections. In the lateral approach group, there were 1 (1.4%) deep infection and 2 superficial wound infections (2.9%). There were not statistically significant differences between the groups. There was a significant difference between anterior approach (115minutes) and lateral approach group (179minutes) in terms of surgical time (P<0.001). ConclusionsThe frequency of superficial and deep periprosthetic infections during the first postoperative year was not significantly different in the lateral approach group compared to the anterior approach group, despite the significantly longer surgical time in the lateral transfibular approach group.

Viability of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing surgery in mandibular reconstruction

Background: Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) has created many new opportunities for the planning and implementation of mandibular reconstruction. Although this surgical method seems to be accurate, the question of the additional cost should be discussed. Objectives: To evaluate the cost generated by CAD-CAM surgery, we performed a comparative study assessing a total of 45 patients treated for mandibular neoplasms. The sample size was divided into two groups: (1) test group: 25 patients undergoing CAD-CAM mandibular reconstruction; and (2) control group: 20 patients undergoing a ‘traditional’ freehand mandibular reconstruction. Methods: Data concerning operation time, complications, and days of hospitalisation were used to evaluate costs related to the management of both groups of patients. Findings and Conclusion: The mean operating time for the CAD-CAM group was 440 min, whereas that for the freehand group was 550.5 min. The total difference in terms of average time gain was 110.5 min. No microvascular complication occurred in the CAD-CAM group; two complications, related to the reconstructive plates (8%) were observed in patients undergoing freehand reconstructions. The mean overall lengths of hospital stay were 14 days for the CAD-CAM group and 17 days for the freehand group. Finally, considering that the institutional cost per minute of theatre time is €30, the money saved as a result of the time gained for the CAD-CAM group, was €3400. This cost corresponds approximately to the total price of the CAD-CAM surgery. We believe that costs for CAD-CAM surgery will be covered by gains in terms of surgical time, quality of reconstruction, and reduced complications.

Usefulness of surgical complexity classification index in cataract surgery process

ObjectiveTo evaluate the usefulness of surgical complexity classification index (SCCI) to predict the degree of surgical difficulty in cataract surgery. Material and methodsThis retrospective study includes data collected between January 2013 and December 2014 from patients who underwent cataract extraction by phacoemulsification at our hospital. A sample size of 159 patients was obtained by simple random sampling (p=0.5, 10% accuracy, 95% confidence). The main variables were: recording and value of SCCI in electronic medical record (EMR), presence of exfoliation syndrome (XFS), criteria for inclusion in surgical waiting list (SWL), and functional results. SCCI was classified into 7 categories (range: 1–4) according to predictors of technical difficulty, which was indirectly estimated in terms of surgical time (ST). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v15.0 statistical software. ResultsPrevalence of XFS was 18.2% (95%CI: 11.9–24.5). In terms of quality indicators in the cataract surgery process, 96.8% of patients met at least one of the criteria to be included in SWL, and 98.1% gained ≥2 Snellen lines. The SCCI was recorded in EMR of 98.1% patients, and it was grouped for study into 2 categories: high and low surgical complexity. Statistically significant differences in the distribution of ST were found depending on the assigned SCCI (p<0.005) and the presence of XFS (p<0.005). ConclusionsThe SCCI enables to estimate the degree of surgical complexity in terms of ST in cataract surgery, which is especially useful in those areas with high prevalence of XFS, because of the higher theoretical risk of surgical complications.

Is a computer-assisted design and computer-assisted manufacturing method for mandibular reconstruction economically viable?

The design and manufacture of patient-specific mandibular reconstruction plates, particularly in combination with cutting guides, has created many new opportunities for the planning and implementation of mandibular reconstruction. Although this surgical method is being used more widely and the outcomes appear to be improved, the question of the additional cost has to be discussed. To evaluate the cost generated by the management of this technology, we studied a cohort of patients treated for mandibular neoplasms. The population was divided into two groups of 20 patients each who were undergoing a 'traditional' freehand mandibular reconstruction or a computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) mandibular reconstruction. Data concerning operation time, complications, and days of hospitalisation were used to evaluate costs related to the management of these patients. The mean operating time for the CAD-CAM group was 435min, whereas that for the freehand group was 550.5min. The total difference in terms of average time gain was 115.5min. No microvascular complication occurred in the CAD-CAM group; two complications (10%) were observed in patients undergoing freehand reconstructions. The mean overall lengths of hospital stay were 13.8 days for the CAD-CAM group and 17 days for the freehand group. Finally, considering that the institutional cost per minute of theatre time is €30, the money saved as a result of the time gained was €3,450. This cost corresponds approximately to the total price of the CAD-CAM surgery. In conclusion, we believe that CAD-CAM technology for mandibular reconstruction will become a widely used reconstructive method and that its cost will be covered by gains in terms of surgical time, quality of reconstruction, and reduced complications.

Utilidad del índice de complejidad quirúrgica en el proceso de cirugía de catarata

ObjectiveTo evaluate the usefulness of surgical complexity classification index (SCCI) to predict the degree of surgical difficulty in cataract surgery. Material and methodsThis retrospective study includes data collected between January 2013 and December 2014 from patients who underwent cataract extraction by phacoemulsification at our hospital. A sample size of 159 patients was obtained by simple random sampling (P=.5, 10% accuracy, 95% confidence). The main variables were: recording and value of SCCI in electronic medical record (EMR), presence of exfoliation syndrome (XFS), criteria for inclusion in surgical waiting list (SWL), and functional results. SCCI was classified into 7 categories (range: 1-4) according to predictors of technical difficulty, which was indirectly estimated in terms of surgical time (ST). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v15.0 statistical software. ResultsPrevalence of XFS was 18.2% (95%CI: 11.9-24.5). In terms of quality indicators in the cataract surgery process, 96.8% of patients met at least one of the criteria to be included in SWL, and 98.1% gained ≥2 Snellen lines. The SCCI was recorded in EMR of 98.1% patients, and it was grouped for study into 2 categories: High and low surgical complexity. Statistically significant differences in the distribution of ST were found depending on the assigned SCCI (P<.005) and the presence of XFS (P<.005). ConclusionsThe SCCI enables to estimate the degree of surgical complexity in terms of ST in cataract surgery, which is especially useful in those areas with high prevalence of XFS, because of the higher theoretical risk of surgical complications.

Incidence of Posterior Capsular Opacification Based on Low and High Fluid-dynamic Parameters

Purpose: To compare the incidence of posterior capsular opacification (PCO) based on low and high fluid-dynamic parameters during cataract surgery and evaluate the importance of these findings. Methods: This retrospective study included 125 eyes in 73 patients with senile cataract who received a cataract surgery between September 2013 and March 2014. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those with low (vacuum: 180 mm Hg, aspiration flow: 18 mL/min, bottle height: 55 cm) and high (vacuum: 400 mm Hg, aspiration flow: 22 mL/min, bottle height: 90 cm) fluidic parameters during the nucleus was removal. We measured the total surgery time, ultrasound time, and balanced salt solution consumption during phacoemulsification. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), PCO score, PCO percentage and severity were measured at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Endothelial cell density (ECD) was measured preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. Results: The study included 20 eyes of 13 patients with low parameters and 20 eyes of 15 patients with high parameters. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean total surgery time, ultrasound time or fluid consumption between the two groups. BCVA and ECD were not significantly different between the two groups during the postoperative follow-up. PCO score, percentage and severity were higher in the low parameter group at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Conclusions: Surgery with low fluid-dynamic parameters is equally effective as with high parameters in terms of surgical time and postoperative BCVA. However, the incidence of PCO was higher in the low fluid-dynamic parameter group up to 12 months. Surgical efforts to reduce remnant lens epithelial cells are needed during low fluidic-dynamic parameter surgery. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2016;57(10):1555-1562

An RCT study comparing the clinical and radiological outcomes with the use of PLIF or TLIF after instrumented reduction in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis.

We prospectively compared posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) used in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS) after surgical reduction with pedicle screws. Between January 2009 and December 2010, 66 adult patients with single-level IS were randomly assigned to two groups treated using the PLIF technique (PLIF group, n=34) and the TLIF technique (TLIF group, n=32). Both groups were followed up for an average of 30.5months (range 24-48months). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Japanese orthopedic association (JOA) scores. Radiographic outcomes included percentage of vertebral slippage, focal lordosis and disk height. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared between the two groups. The average operative time and blood loss during surgery were significantly more in PLIF group than in TLIF group. Spondylolisthesis, disk height and focal lordosis were significantly improved postoperatively in both groups. There was no obvious difference in clinical outcomes, as assessed using the VAS, ODI and JOA scores, and radiographic outcomes. In PLIF group, there were two cases of neuropathic pain after surgery. After instrumented reduction of adult IS, either PLIF or TLIF can provide good clinical and radiological outcomes. With a single cage, TLIF was superior to PLIF in terms of surgical time and blood loss, but these differences may not be clinically relevant.

Open Carpal Tunnel Decompression by Specialist versus Nurse Practitioner

To compare the outcome after open carpal tunnel decompression by specialists versus a nurse practitioner. Of 1361 cases of open carpel tunnel decompression under local anaesthesia from 1996 to 2008, 807 were performed by specialists (consultant, specialist registrar, or specialty and associate specialist) and 554 by a nurse practitioner (since May 2006). The 2 groups were compared in terms of surgical time, total theatre time, postoperative pain, and patient satisfaction with the service. The mean surgical time was shorter in cases performed by specialists (13 vs. 18 minutes, p<0.0001), as was the mean total theatre time (26 vs. 29 minutes, p=0.0154). The rate of postoperative pain was higher in cases performed by specialists (31.5% vs. 24.5%, p=0.0125), as was the rate of patient dissatisfaction (1.6% vs. 0.18%, 0.0113). Nonetheless, since May 2006, outcome was comparable for specialists and the nurse practitioner. This could be due to the change from short-acting to long-acting/mixed local anaesthetic, and the technique for infiltration. The waiting time for surgery reduced from a mean of 16 to 3 weeks. Specialists and the nurse practitioner achieved comparable outcome after open carpal tunnel decompression.

Should full threaded compression screws be used in adult femoral neck fractures?

IntroductionOperative treatment consisting of fracture reduction and fixation, or arthroplasty to permit early patient mobilization, continues to be the treatment of choice for most femoral neck fractures. Options for internal fixation have included a variety of implants; however most recent reports and textbooks cite parallel multiple cancellous screws as the surgical technique of choice. MethodsThe study was prospective, randomized and IRB approved. Inclusion criteria included skeletal maturity, closed femoral neck fracture without concomitant fractures or injuries with complete charts and adequate radiographs obtained from the initial injury till the last follow-up. Forty-four patients were enrolled in this study during one-year period at two university centers. 22 were randomized to be treated with full threaded, cannulated compression screws (Acutrak 6/7, ACUMED) (Group 1) and the other 22 with 16mm partial threaded, 6.5mm or 7.3mm cannulated screws (SYNTHES) (Group 2). Three or four screws were used in both groups according to fracture type and surgeon's preference. Data evaluated included surgical time, fluoroscopy time, fracture type, radiological outcome, complications and functional status using the Harris Hip Score. ResultsBoth groups were comparable in terms of age and gender. There was not a significant difference in terms of surgical time, follow-up period, fracture type, or fluoroscopy time. There were eight complications in Group 1 and two in Group 2 (P=0.049) Time to union was significantly longer in Group 1 (P=0.001). However, Hip Scores were not significantly different in both groups (P=0.20). ConclusionWhen compared with full threaded compression screws, partial-threaded cannulated screws provides a shorter union time and less complication rate while providing equivalent functional results in adult femoral neck fractures.

Is Unilateral Kyphoplasty as Effective and Safe as Bilateral Kyphoplasties for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures? A Meta-analysis

An osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture is a common condition in elderly people, especially women. The percutaneous kyphoplasty is an effective treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Controversy remains regarding whether a unilateral or a bilateral approach is superior, and to our knowledge, there have been no large studies comparing these two approaches, therefore a meta-analysis synthesizing the data on this question is warranted. We asked the following questions: (1) Is there evidence to suggest a benefit in clinical outcome as assessed by the VAS and Oswestry Disability Index of a unilateral kyphoplasty or bilateral kyphoplasties? (2) Are the complications associated with the two approaches different? (3) Do the procedures result in different kyphosis angle reduction or anterior vertebral height restoration? (4) Is the surgical time for the procedures different? We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Knowledge MEDLINE (January 1980 to June 2013), and reference lists of eligible prospective studies. The levels of the evidence and recommendations were assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system. Five studies encompassing 253 patients met the inclusion criteria. The short- and long-term clinical outcomes as assessed by the VAS and Oswestry Disability Index showed no differences between unilateral and bilateral kyphoplasties (p = 0.41, p = 0.60 for VAS; p = 0.10, p = 0.36 for Oswestry Disability Index). There were no differences in complications such as cement leakage and adjacent vertebral fractures associated with the two approaches (p = 0.43 and p = 0.95). The kyphosis angle reduction and anterior vertebral height restoration showed no difference between the two approaches (p = 0.34 and p = 0.46). The unilateral approach was shorter in terms of surgical time (mean difference, -24.98; p < 0.0001). The overall GRADE system evidence quality was very low, with only high evidence for operation time, which lessens our confidence in recommendations. Unilateral and bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasties appear to be safe and effective for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. No clinically important differences were found between them. Considering less operation time and less cost, we suggest that a unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty is advantageous, but because of the poor quality of the evidence, high-quality randomized controlled trials are required to resolve this issue.

Comparison of the Transperitoneal and Retroperitoneal Approach in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy in an Initial Case Series in Japan

To compare the results from the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches in our initial case series of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in terms of surgical time, renal artery clamping time, postoperative renal function, adverse events, and surgical margin status. The initial 26 consecutive RAPNs performed for solid renal tumors in our hospital were categorized by the approach used, transperitoneal or retroperitoneal, and compared for body mass index, tumor size, R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score, PADUA score, tumor location, surgical time, renal artery clamping time, renal function change after surgery, operative blood loss, surgical margin status, and adverse events (AEs). The median tumor size was 25 mm (range 15-50). A transperitoneal approach was used in 16 patients and a retroperitoneal approach was used in 10 patients. There was no significant difference in renal tumor and patient characteristics between the two groups except tumor location (anterior tumor was significantly more in the transperitoneal approach and posterior tumor was significantly more in retroperitoneal approach (P=0.0144 and P=0.0100, respectively)). Operative time (239 ± 63.0 minutes in the transperitoneal group vs. 193 ± 40.6 minutes in the retroperitoneal group), warm ischemic time (24.3 ± 9.07 minutes in the transperitoneal group vs. 24.7 ± 8.35 minutes in the retroperitoneal group) and AEs (1/16 in the transperitoneal group vs. 1/10 in the retroperitoneal group; both cases were Clavien-Dindo grade I) did not show any significant difference between the two approaches (P=0.0792, 0.5485, and 0.7270, respectively). The retroperitoneal approach in RAPN appears to be a safe and technically feasible minimally invasive option for nephron-sparing surgery, based on our initial case series, and showed equivalent outcomes to those of the transperitoneal approach even though it was an initial robotic renal surgery series. Future studies, including a larger number of cases, are planned to draw more definitive conclusions.

Single-incision cholecystectomy: a comparative study of standard laparoscopic, robotic, and SPIDER platforms

Many series have shown the feasibility and safety of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC), but this technique still has limitations such as instrument collisions and lack of triangulation. Recently, two single-incision platforms, robotic and SPIDER, have attempted to ameliorate such problems. This study aimed to compare three different techniques of single-incision cholecystectomy: standard laparoscopic, robotic, and SPIDER approaches. The authors retrospectively collected data from their first 166 single-incision robotic cholecystectomies (SIRCs) and compared the findings with the data from their first 166 SILCs and the first 166 s-generation SPIDER procedures. All the SILCs were performed with three trocars placed in one umbilical incision and with gallbladder retraction using a Prolene stitch on the right upper quadrant. All the robotic cases were managed using the da Vinci Single-Site Surgical System, and all the SPIDER procedures were performed using the SPIDER Surgical System. The SILC, SIRC, and SPIDER groups consisted respectively of 129 (76.3%), 131 (78.9%), and 136 (81.9%) women with the respective mean ages of 44.5 ± 14.3, 51.6 ± 15.9, and 46.4 ± 15.2 years. The mean body mass indexes (BMIs) were respectively 29.1 ± 5.6, 29.4 ± 6.2, and 27.5 ± 4.8 kg/m(2), and the mean surgical times were 37.1 ± 13.3, 63.0 ± 25.2, and 52.8 ± 18.7 min. The total hospital stays were respectively 1.3 ± 5.3, 1.2 ± 2.2, and 1.5 ± 2.6 days, and complications were seen respectively in three SILC cases (1.8%), three SIRC cases (1.8%), and two SPIDER cases (1.2%). The results of this study demonstrate similar results among the three platforms for most of the parameters measured. The SILC procedure appears to be superior to SIRC and SPIDER in terms of surgical time, but selection bias could be the cause. The SILS, SIRC, and SPIDER procedures all are similar in terms of complication profile. It can be concluded that SILC, SIRC, and SPIDER all are feasible and safe alternatives when used for single-incision cholecystectomy.

Tourniquet Use During Cementation Only During Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Trial

Total knee arthroplasty with the use of a tourniquet during the entire operation has not been shown to improve the performance of the operation and may increase the risk of complications. We asked whether the limited use of a tourniquet for cementation only would affect (1) surgical time; (2) postoperative pain and motion of the knee; (3) blood loss; or (4) complications such as risk of nerve injuries, quadriceps dysfunction, and drainage compared with use of a tourniquet throughout the procedure. Seventy-one patients (79 knees) were randomized to either use of a tourniquet from the incision through cementation of the implants and deflated for closure (operative tourniquet group) or tourniquet use only during cementation (cementation tourniquet group). The initial study population was a minimum of 30 knees in each group as suggested for randomized studies by American Society for Testing and Materials standards; termination of the study was determined by power analysis performed after 40 knees in each group showed any statistical solution to our questions would require a minimum of 260 more cases. Patients were excluded who were considered in previous randomized studies as high risk for complications, which might be attributed to the tourniquet. There were no differences in terms of surgical time, pain scores, pain medicine requirements, range of motion, hemoglobin change, or total blood loss. One major complication (compartmental syndrome) occurred in a patient with tourniquet inflation until closure. No other complications were attributed to the use of a tourniquet. With the numbers available, our results suggest that there are no important clinical differences between patients who had a tourniquet inflated throughout the procedure compared with those who had it inflated only during cementation. Tourniquet inflation for cementation only provides the benefit of bloodless bone for fixation and may eliminate the risks associated with prolonged tourniquet use.

Internal Fixation of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Clinical Comparison of Two Implant Designs

Objective. To compare two internal fixation devices clinically in stabilisation of intertrochanteric femur fractures. Methods. Eighty-seven patients were randomised upon their admission to the hospital using a sealed envelope method. Forty-five were treated with proximal femur nail antirotation (PFNA) and 42 with reverse less invasive stabilisation system (LISS). The perioperative data were recorded and compared in relation to fracture type. Results. In each type of fractures, no significant differences were found with respect to the blood loss, the quality of reduction, the time to bony healing, and the Harris hip score between the 2 groups. The mean duration of surgery was significantly longer in reverse LISS group than in PFNA group. Conclusion. Both the PFNA and the reversed LISS are effective in the treatment of different types of intertrochanteric femur fractures. PFNA is superior to reverse LISS in terms of surgical time, weight-bearing, and perhaps fluoroscopy time.

Laparoscopic Exploration versus Intraoperative Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Common Bile Duct Stones: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Background/Aims: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) combined with intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy (IOES) was compared to LC with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) to define the best single-session minimally invasive treatment for cholecystocholedocholithiasis. Methods: Between June 2009 and December 2010, patients with gallstones and common bile duct (CBD) stones diagnosed by preoperative ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography were randomized to LC-LCBDE or LC-IOES. The primary end point was complete clearance of CBD of stones. The secondary end points were operation time, conversion rate, length of hospital stay, complications and mortality. Results: Two hundred and twenty-six patients were eligible. They were randomized to LC-LCBDE (n = 115) and LC-IOES (n = 111). There was no statistically significant difference in the success rate of CBD clearance between the two interventions (92% for LC-LCBDE vs. 97.2% for LC-IOES with a p value >0.05). There were no differences between the two groups in terms of surgical time and postoperative length of stay. Pancreatitis and bleeding sphincterotomy were significantly more prevalent in the LC-IOES group, while bile leakage and retained CBD stones were significantly more prevalent in the LC-LCBDE group. Conclusion: Both LC-IOES and LC-LCBDE were shown to be safe, effective, minimally invasive treatments for cholecystocholedocholithiasis, but the former option may be preferred when facilities and experience in endoscopic therapy exist.

Reducción del tiempo quirúrgico y de las complicaciones en el tratamiento endovascular con láser

Introduction In recent years there have been significant advances in the use of endovenous laser in the treatment of varicose pathology. This technique is performed by prior application of tumescent anesthesia in the whole area to treat and then inserting a laser fiber inside the saphenous vein provoking its thermal occlusion. The advantages of this technique is that it does not require general or spinal anesthesia, has a short intervention time, and is better tolerated by patients. Objective To reduce operating time of this technique without changing its efficacy and effectiveness, we used a method of perivenous tissue protection through the application of external cold, thus avoiding the use of tumescent anesthesia. Methods We have treated a total of 12 patients. In all, basal temperature was recorded before treatment and during laser discharge. We also recorded the average surgical time and complications. Results The average baseline temperature before laser discharge was 33 °C, with an average of 40 °C during laser treatment. In terms of surgical time, an average of 30 minutes was achieved. There were no treatment-related complications. Finally, in the follow-up to one year, total occlusion of saphenous vein was demonstrated in all patients. Conclusion The application of our method of perivenous saphenous tissue protection can shorten the operating time of laser treatment.

Superficial Parotidectomy Versus Retrograde Partial Superficial Parotidectomy in Treating Benign Salivary Gland Tumor (Pleomorphic Adenoma)

Of all benign salivary gland tumors of the parotid gland, pleomorphic adenoma (mixed tumor) is the most common. It accounts for 60% to 70% of all benign tumors of the parotid gland. This neoplasm arises in patients in the fourth to sixth decade of life, with a female predominance. The surgical excision of this lesion continues to be the subject of major debate. The goal is to avoid facial disability yet attain complete resection without perforation of the capsule/pseudocapsule. The purpose of our study is to compare 2 surgical techniques performed at the Ear, Nose, and Throat and Maxillofacial Departments, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel, and determine which is preferable in treating this lesion. We reviewed 48 patients who underwent excision of pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland between 1996 and 2005 at Rambam Medical Center: 18 were treated surgically with the classical superficial parotidectomy (SP) technique, using an anterograde approach, and 30 were treated with retrograde partial superficial parotidectomy (PSP). We compared the 2 surgical techniques in terms of surgical time, histopathologic size of the lesion, amount of excised healthy parotid tissue, histologic margin, and the preservation of the capsule/pseudocapsule. We also made clinical records of temporary or definitive injury to the facial nerve, which branches of the facial nerve were temporarily or definitively injured, the occurrence of Frey syndrome, esthetic satisfaction, and the amount of recurrence or infection after surgery. Of the 48 patients, 19 (39.6%) were male and 29 (60.4%) were female, with a mean age (+/- SD) of 43.8 +/- 16.97 years (median, 50 years; range, 12-79 years). We found a significant difference (P = .029) in mean surgical time (+/- SD): 171 +/- 49.7 minutes (median, 165 minutes) when performing the classical SP and 145 +/- 42.7 minutes (median, 130 minutes) when performing the retrograde PSP. Much more healthy parotid tissue was taken out with the classical procedure (mean, 51.4 +/- 13.6 mm; median, 50 mm) than with the retrograde PSP technique (mean, 39.2 +/- 11.8; median, 35 mm) (P = .01). There was a significant difference (P = .0003) in facial nerve injuries: 39% of patients did not report any facial deficit in the SP group compared with 90% in the PSP group. In the SP group, only 3 patients reported a permanent deficit, and in the PSP group, only 3 patients had a temporary deficit (compared with 8 in the SP group). The main injuries occurred in the mandibular branch with both techniques: 6 SP and 2 PSP. There was no difference in esthetic satisfaction: 72.2% of patients in the SP group and 80% in the PSP group had no esthetic complaints. In the SP group, patients mainly complained about swelling (3 patients), and in the retrograde PSP group, the main complaint was depression (4 patients). Frey syndrome was found in 9 patients in the retrograde PSP group and 4 in the classical SP group (with an overall rate of 27.7%). The lesion recurred in only 2 patients--1 in each group. With both of the techniques, we found satisfactory results. In the majority of cases, retrograde PSP is a superior technique to the classical SP, although Frey syndrome is more often observed with the former.

Noncontiguous anterior decompression and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective randomized control clinical study

Anterior decompression and fusion is an established procedure in surgical treatment for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM). However, contiguous corpectomies and fusion (CCF) often induce postoperative complications such as nonunion, graft subsidence, and loss of lordotic alignment. As an alternative, noncontiguous corpectomies or one-level corpectomy plus adjacent-level discectomy with retention of an intervening body has been developed recently. In this study, we prospectively compared noncontiguous anterior decompression and fusion (NADF) and CCF for MCSM in terms of surgical invasiveness, clinical and radiographic outcomes, and complications. From January 2005 to June 2007, 105 patients with MCSM were randomized to NADF group (n = 55) and CCF group (n = 50), and followed up for average 31.5 months (range 24-48 months). Average operative time and blood loss decreased significantly in the NADF group as compared with those in the CCF group (p < 0.05 and <0.001, respectively). For VAS, within 3 months postoperatively, there was no significant difference between the two groups. But at 6 months after surgery and final follow-up, VAS improved significantly in NADF group than that in CCF group (p < 0.05). No significant difference of JOA score was observed between the two groups at every collection time. In NADF group, all 55 cases obtained fusion at 1 year after operation (average 5.1 months). In CCF group, 48 cases achieved fusion 1 year postoperatively, but the other 2 cases were performed posterior stabilization and achieved fusion 6 months later. The differences of cervical lordosis between two groups were insignificant at the same follow-up time. But the loss of lordosis and height of fusion segments in 6 months postoperatively and final follow-up were significantly more in CFF group than in NADF group (p < 0.001). Complications were similar in both groups. But in CCF group three cases needed reoperation, one case with extradural hematoma was immediately re-operated after anterior decompression and two cases mentioned above were performed posterior stabilization at 1 year postoperatively. In conclusion, in the patients with MCSM, without developmental stenosis and continuous or combined ossification of posterior longitudinal ligaments, NADF and CCF showed an identical effect of decompression. In terms of surgical time, blood loss, VAS, fusion rate and cervical alignment, NADF was superior compared with CCF.

Outcomes After Laparoscopic Treatment of Complicated Versus Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: A Prospective, Comparative Trial

Laparoscopic treatment of simple acute appendicitis (AA) is a safe procedure; however, there are doubts about its safety in cases of complicated AA. The aim of this study was to determine the differences in results of laparoscopic treatment between cases of complicated versus simple AA. We prospectively included all patients treated for suspected AA by two surgeons of our service between May 2002 and May 2007. Of 221 patients, 20 were excluded from the study because the laparoscopic approach was not possible; 116 of 201 had uncomplicated AA, 57 complicated AA, 12 gynecologic ethiology, 11 negative appendectomy, and 5 other causes; patients without acute appendicitis were also excluded from the study. In all cases, laparoscopy was the first treatment option. The following variables were considered: mean surgical time, reconversions, emergency readmissions, emergency reinterventions or invasive procedures, mean postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications (i.e., infectious or noninfectious). Our results showed statistically significantly worse results, in terms of surgical time, postoperative stay, reconversions, and infectious complications, for patients with complicated versus uncomplicated AA; however, no differences were observed regarding noninfectious complications, emergency readmissions, and emergency reinterventions or invasive procedures. We consider that laparoscopic treatment of complicated AA may be safely used, despite worse results than in cases of simple AA, since the differences in numbers of severe postoperative complications requiring emergency readmission, reintervention, or invasive procedures were not statistically significant.

Simultaneous Bilateral Native Nephrectomy and Living Donor Renal Transplantation are Successful for Polycystic Kidney Disease: The University of Maryland Experience

Patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease have significant morbidity due to large kidney size and the resultant compression of adjacent organs. Surgical extirpation is limited to the most severe cases due to the risk of complications. Typically surgical extirpation of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease kidneys and renal transplantation are performed in staged fashion. The additive risks of these 2 procedures have been a barrier to a simultaneous surgical approach. The risks include transplant compromise due to cyst rupture, bleeding, adjacent organ injury and anti-HLA antibody sensitization from transfusion in cases of pretransplant nephrectomy. We reviewed the results of and graft survival data on bilateral nephrectomy for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease with simultaneous live donor renal transplantation. From August 2003 to November 2007, 20 sets of kidneys were removed in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, followed by simultaneous live donor transplantation. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes in terms of surgical time, complications, length of stay, transfusion rate and transplant kidney status. A total of 20 sets of kidneys were removed and these patients then underwent immediate live donor renal transplantation. Mean operative time was 190 minutes for the bilateral nephrectomy portion alone with an average estimated blood loss of 723 cc. Complications were rare and well tolerated. Mean hospital stay was 7.2 days for this procedure. Graft survival was 100% and all patients reported relief of symptoms. Bilateral nephrectomy and immediate transplantation in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease can be done with minimal morbidity. Preliminary studies show that patients may have significant improvement in quality of life from this procedure and graft viability is not compromised.