s 401 evaluated the results in patients treated by hybrid and traditional surgery in order to establish if these procedures could be considered as the first choice. Methods: We performed a retrospective study analyzing a frame time of 13 years in order to identify patients with iliac femoral atheromatous disease (TASC II C/D). Primary end points have been considered the primary patency rate, limb savage and survival rate. Secondary end points such as secondary assisted patency, re-interventions and complications rate. Results: We identified 178 limbs in 168 patients (100 vs. 78 limbs treated respectively with Open and Hybrid approach). In the Hybrid group 86% of the patients were classified as ASA III/IV vs. 31% in Open group. Median age was 68 vs. 75 respectively per open and hybrid group. Indication for hybrid procedures was given in 93 limbs but after an accurate pre-operative study with Angio-CT scan we excluded 15 limbs due heavy calcification in 13 patients classified as ASA III/IV that underwent to extraanatomic repair. The technical success was 91.7% vs.100% (Open versus Hybrid). Primary patency in Open vs. Hybrid group at 1, 5 years was respectively 98%,99% vs. 7.5%,96.1%, assisted patency at 1, 5 years 99%, 98% vs. 98.7%, 97.5%, limb salvage at 1, 5 years 99%,98% vs. 96%,93.5%. 30 days mortality and at 1, 5 years were 5.6% e 28.4% vs. 1.2% e 25.6% Open vs. Hybrid group. Similar post-operative complications rate (6%) were observed in both groups, but 8.1% of open group needed admission intensive unit care. Conclusion: Hybrid procedures offered good results in terms of patency and limb salvage rate and with a low 30 mortality in patients classified at high risk for surgery. Similar survival rates between the 2 groups despite the high co-morbidities and older age that characterized the Hybrid group. Considering the good results the hybrid procedures could be considered as the first choice, but in some patients the anatomic arterial features remain the main limitation that still need traditional repair. Comparison between Aorto-bifemoral Bypass and Aorto-iliac Kissing Stent in Patients with Complex Aorto-iliac Obstructive Disease W. Dorigo , G. Piffaretti , F. Benedetto , R. Pulli , P. Castelli , F. Spinelli , C. Pratesi 1 1 Dept. of Vascular Surgery, University of Florence, Italy 2 Dept. of Vascular Surgery, University of Varese, Italy 3 Dept. of Vascular Surgery, University of Messina, Italy Introduction: To retrospectively compare early and late results of aortobifemoral bypass and endovascular recanalization with the kissing stent technique in the management of TASC II C and D lesions in the aorto-iliac district in a multicentre study. Methods: From January 2006 to December 2013, 293 open and endovascular interventions for TASC-II class C and D aorto-iliac obstructive lesions were performed at three Italian teaching hospitals. In 210 patients the intervention was performed for aortic and bilateral iliac involvement: an aorto-bifemoral bypass was performed in 82 patients (Group 1) while in the remaining 128 an endovascular recanalization with the kissing stent technique (Group 2). Early results in the two groups were compared with c test. Follow up results were analyzed with Kaplan-Meyer curves and compared with log rank test. Results: There were no differences between the two groups in terms of demographic data, comorbidities, or risk factors for atherosclerosis, except for a higher percentage of females and of diabetic patients in group 2. Critical limb ischemia was present in 29 patients in group 1 (35.5%) and in 31 patients in group 2 (24%, p 1⁄4 0.07). Technical success in group 2 was 98.5%; two patients required immediate conversion to open surgery for iliac rupture. There was one peri-operative death in group 1 (mortality rate 1.2%, p 1⁄4 0.2 in comparison with group 2). Four peri-operative thromboses occurred; two in group 1 and two in group 2 (in one case requiring conversion to open surgical intervention) and no amputations at 30 days were recorded. Post-operative local and systemic complications occurred in 20 patients in group 1 (24%) and in 13 patients in group 2 (10% p 1⁄4 0.006). Mean duration of follow up was 39 months (range 1 e108 months). Survival rates at 6 years were 65% (SE 0.07) in group 1 and 82% (SE 0.05) in group 2 (p1⁄4 0.07). At the same time interval, primary, assisted primary and secondary patency rates were similar; re-intervention rates were 6% in group 1 (SE 0.05) and 11% in group 2 (SE 0.04; p 1⁄4 0.2). Conclusion: Endovascular repair of complex aorto-iliac lesions with the kissing stent technique, in the multicentre experience, provided similar satisfactory early and late results to those obtained with open surgery, however with a lower rate of peri-operative complications and a trend towards better long-term survival. Long Term Outcomes of Common Femoral Artery Endovascular Repair A. Kaladji, P.-A. Vent, P. Chaillou, A. Costargent, T. Quillard, Y. Goueffic
Read full abstract