Terminology Criteria For Adverse Events Research Articles

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease with asparaginase products: a review of cases reported to the FDA adverse event reporting system and published in the literature

Multiple asparaginase products have been approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in pediatric and adult patients. Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) is a potentially life-threatening disorder resulting from damage to the liver sinusoidal endothelial cells. To evaluate this safety concern with asparaginase (i.e. Asparlas, Oncaspar, Rylaze, and Erwinaze) use, we performed a postmarketing review of hepatic VOD reports retrieved from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database and literature with these four products. We identified 55 cases of hepatic VOD following exposure to asparaginase products. The median time to onset of hepatic VOD from the first dose of asparaginase was 18 days (interquartile range 13-24 days). Notably, 80% (44/55) of cases reported grades 3-5 VOD per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Although patients received asparaginase with standard chemotherapeutic agents known to induce VOD, case-level data indicates that asparaginase products may have contributed to hepatic VOD. Asparaginase products are associated with hepatotoxicity and thrombosis, suggesting a plausible mechanism for asparaginase-induced hepatic VOD. Based on the totality of data, including temporality and biologic plausibility, we determined hepatic VOD to be a class effect with asparaginase products. These data contributed to the addition of hepatic VOD to the hepatoxicity warning in the US Prescribing Information for asparaginase class products.

Capivasertib and fulvestrant for patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (CAPItello-291): patient-reported outcomes from a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

CAPItello-291 is an ongoing phase 3 trial in which capivasertib-fulvestrant significantly improved progression-free survival versus placebo-fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had relapse or disease progression during or after aromatase inhibitor treatment, in both the overall population and in patients with PIK3CA, AKT1, or PTEN-altered tumours. This study further explored patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL), functioning, symptoms, and symptom tolerability in CAPItello-291. This phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, which was conducted across 193 hospitals and cancer centres in 19 countries, enrolled women with any menopausal status or men, aged ≥18 years (≥20 years in Japan), with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had relapse or disease progression during or after treatment with an aromatase inhibitor, with or without previous cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 or 6 inhibitor therapy. Patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/WHO performance score of 0 or 1 and could have received up to two previous lines of endocrine therapy and up to one previous line of chemotherapy for advanced disease. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using block randomisation (stratified according to the presence or absence of liver metastases, previous use of a CDK4/6 inhibitor [yes vs no], and geographical region) to receive oral capivasertib 400 mg (twice daily for 4 days, followed by 3 days off) plus intramuscular fulvestrant 500 mg (every 14 days for the first three injections, then every 28 days) or placebo with matching fulvestrant dosing. The dual primary endpoint of the trial was investigator-assessed progression-free survival assessed both in the overall population and among patients with PIK3CA, AKT1, or PTEN-altered tumours. The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire 30-item core module (QLQ-C30) and breast module (QLQ-BR23), Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE), and Patient Global Impression of Treatment Tolerability (PGI-TT) questionnaires were used to assess patient-reported outcomes. Evaluation of EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 were secondary endpoints and evaluation of PRO-CTCAE and PGI-TT were pre-defined exploratory endpoints, and these endpoints are the subject of analysis in this Article. Data were collected at baseline and prespecified timepoints. Patient-reported outcomes were analysed in all randomly assigned patients with an evaluable baseline assessment and at least one evaluable post-baseline assessment. Change from baseline was assessed using mixed model with repeated measures for EORTC QLQ-C30 and summarised for QLQ-BR23. Time to deterioration was described using the Kaplan-Meier method. PGI-TT and PRO-CTCAE responses were summarised at each treatment cycle. Patient-reported outcomes were not prospectively powered for statistical comparison. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04305496. Between June 2, 2020, and Oct 13, 2021, 901 patients were enrolled, of whom 708 patients were randomly assigned to receive capivasertib-fulvestrant (n=355) or placebo-fulvestrant (n=353). The median age of the patients was 59 years (IQR 51-67) in the capivasertib-fulvestrant group and 58 years (IQR 49-66) in the placebo-fulvestrant group. At data cutoff (Aug 15, 2022), the median duration of follow-up for progression-free survival in censored patients was 13·0 months (IQR 9·1-16·7) for capivasertib-fulvestrant and 12·7 months (IQR 2·0-16·4) for placebo-fulvestrant in the overall population. EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status/quality of life (GHS/QOL) scores were maintained from baseline and were similar between treatment groups throughout the study period (difference in mean change from baseline of -2·5 [95% CI -4·5 to -0·6] with capivasertib-fulvestrant vs -5·6 [-7·9 to -3·4] with placebo-fulvestrant; treatment difference 3·1 [95% CI 0·2 to 6·0]). Median time to deterioration in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QOL was 24·9 months (95% CI 13·8 to not reached) in the capivasertib-fulvestrant group and 12·0 months (10·2 to 15·7) in the placebo-fulvestrant group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·70, 95% CI 0·53 to 0·92). Time to deterioration HRs for all EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 subscale scores showed little difference between the treatment groups, except for diarrhoea, which was worse in the capivasertib-fulvestrant group than in the placebo-fulvestrant group (HR 2·75, 95% CI 2·01-3·81). In PRO-CTCAE symptom assessment, the proportion of patients reporting loose and watery stools "frequently" or "almost constantly" was 29% higher at cycle 1, day 15 in the capivasertib-fulvestrant group than in the placebo-fulvestrant group, decreasing at subsequent cycles. Other PRO-CTCAE-reported symptoms (rash, mouth or throat sores, itchy skin, and numbness or tingling in hands or feet) were absent or mild in most patients in both groups throughout treatment. According to the PGI-TT, most patients in both groups reported "not at all" or "a little bit" of bother from treatment side-effects. Patient-reported outcomes from CAPItello-291 demonstrated that capivasertib-fulvestrant delayed time to deterioration of GHS/QOL and maintained other dimensions of HRQOL (except symptoms of diarrhoea) similarly to fulvestrant. With the clinical efficacy and manageable safety profile, these exploratory results further support the positive benefit-risk profile of capivasertib-fulvestrant in this population. AstraZeneca.

Contrast-enhanced US versus US-guided biopsy for abdominal and pelvic neoplasm in paediatric patients: a propensity score matching study.

To compare the diagnostic performance of CEUS-guided biopsy (CEUS-GB) and ultrasound-guided biopsy (US-GB) in evaluating abdominal and pelvic (abdominopelvic) neoplasms in paediatric patients. Patients aged < 18 years with abdominopelvic tumours who underwent either CEUS-GB or US-GB between April 2005 and May 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. Tumours diagnosed as malignancies by pathology were considered true-positive findings. Benign lesions were identified by pathology or clinical follow-up of at least 6 months. The diagnostic performance of the two groups was compared using propensity score matching (PSM). Complications were also analysed. The present study included 764 paediatric patients (437 boys; median age, 24 months; interquartile range, 10-60 months); 151 were in the CEUS-GB group, and 613 were in the US-GB group. The sample adequacy rate was 100% (151 of 151) for the CEUS-GB group, which was greater than the 97.4% (597 of 613) for the US-GB group (p < 0.001). The overall diagnostic accuracy of the CEUS-GB group and US-GB group was 98.7% (149 of 151) versus 97.3% (581 of 597) in the total cohort (p = 0.551) and 98.7% (149 of 151) versus 92.7% (140 of 151) in the PSM cohort (p = 0.020). Two patients (0.3%) in the US-GB group experienced complications (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), grade 1-2) correlated with the biopsy. No adverse reactions occurred in the CEUS-GB group. CEUS-GB of abdominopelvic tumours in paediatric patients is an effective and safe procedure with greater diagnostic accuracy than US-GB, especially for tumours with necrotic areas. Contrast-enhanced US-guided biopsy of solid abdominal and pelvic tumours in paediatric patients is an effective and safe procedure with greater diagnostic accuracy than US-guided biopsy, especially for tumours with necrotic areas. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) may be superior to conventional ultrasound at guiding biopsy of abdominopelvic masses in paediatric patients. CEUS-guided core needle biopsy of abdominopelvic masses in children was safe and resulted in a diagnostic yield of 98.7%. CEUS guidance should be considered in this population when colour Doppler US is unable to determine a biopsy site.

Increased risk of adverse drug reactions by higher linezolid dose per weight in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis

ObjectivesLinezolid treatment has a high risk of toxicity and adverse drug reactions (ADR) are frequent. Few studies have investigated risk factors of major ADRs separately, therefore, we aimed to evaluate major ADRs including peripheral neuropathy in relation to risk factors and drug concentration levels of linezolid in a high-resource setting for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study including participants treated with a linezolid-containing MDR-TB regimen in Sweden 1992–2018. Data was collected from medical records. ADRs were classified according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0). ResultsOf all participants (n = 132), 43.2% were female and the median age 28 y. The median linezolid treatment was 6.5 months (IQR 3.0–12.7) with a median daily dose of 9.6 mg/kg/d. Any ADR was seen in 58.3% (n = 77) of participants, with 35.6% having peripheral neuropathy (n = 47), 27.3% anaemia (n = 36), 22.0% leukopenia (n = 36) while 6.1% (n = 8) had optic neuritis. The median time for peripheral neuropathy was 3.6 months (IQR 2.1–5.9) and 8.3 months (6.2–10.7) for optic neuritis. A >2.0 mg/L trough concentration (n = 40) was associated with anaemia (P = 0.0038) and thrombocytopenia (P = 0.009) but not with peripheral neuropathy. In multivariable analysis, a dose ≥12 mg/kg/d was associated with time to peripheral neuropathy (HR 2.89, 95% CI 1.08–7.74, P = 0.035), anaemia (HR 6.62, 95% CI 2.22–19.8, P = 0.001) and leukopenia (HR 5.23, 95% CI 1.48–18.5, P = 0.010). ConclusionsLinezolid ADRs were frequent in a high-resource setting. Structured, regular follow-up for ADRs and adjusting dosing according to body weight followed-up by monitoring of drug concentrations early may reduce toxicity.

Impact of acute therapeutic toxicities on anxiety during radiotherapy among Chinese patients with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic head and neck cancer: A cross-sectional study.

147 Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) poses a significant threat to both psychological and physical health. This study aimed to depict the anxiety status of Chinese newly diagnosed nonmetastatic HNC patients during radiotherapy (RT) and to examine predictors of anxiety symptoms. Methods: Newly diagnosed nonmetastatic HNC patients who received RT at the Radiation Therapy Center of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from August 23,2023 to August 24,2023 were recruited into this study. Using Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (Zung SAS) to screen anxiety. Twenty-four common acute therapeutic toxicities (18 patient-reported and 6 clinician-rated) were assessed according to European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Head and Neck 35 (EORTC QLQ-HN35) and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, fifth version (CTCAE V5.0). Chi-square ( χ2) test and multivariate binary logistic regression stepwise forward selection: likelihood ratio (LR) method were applied to identify factors associated with anxiety. Results: A total of 457 patients were included ultimately. Up to 29.10% of the patients showed varying degrees of anxiety and the average SAS standardized score was 45.66 ± 8.83. Chi-square test manifested that sex, annual household income, fatigue, anorexia, nausea, vomit, pain, dysphagia, sense problems (smell and taste), speech problems, trouble in social eating, trouble in social contact, sexual frustration, teeth problems, difficulty in opening mouth, xerostomia, sticky saliva, coughing, feeling ill, use of analgesics, use of nutritional supplements and weight loss were related to anxiety ( p &lt; 0.05). But multivariate logistic regression only demonstrated fatigue (OR = 3.696, 95% CI = 2.096-6.519), speech problems (OR = 3.247, 95% CI = 1.554-6.783), sexual frustration (OR = 2.029, 95% CI = 1.232-3.341), nausea (OR = 3.075, 95% CI = 1.807-5.234), feeling ill (OR = 2.283, 95% CI = 1.215-4.291), use of nutritional supplements (OR = 1.930, 95% CI = 1.136-3.280) and difficulty in opening mouth (OR = 3.007, 95% CI = 1.081-8.363) as independent predictive factors of anxiety. Conclusions: The Chinese newly diagnosed nonmetastatic HNC patients suffered greatly from anxiety during RT. This study identified the predictive contribution of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and 24 common acute therapeutic toxicities to the vulnerability to anxiety, which can provide evidence and reference for medical staff to carry out psychological intervention.

Adverse events reported during weekly isoniazid-rifapentine (3HP) tuberculosis preventive treatment among people living with HIV in Uganda.

Short-course tuberculosis (TB) prevention regimens, including 12 weeks of isoniazid and rifapentine (3HP), are increasingly used in high TB-burden countries. Despite established safety and tolerability in efficacy trials, 3HP-related adverse events (AE) could differ in routine settings. Real-world data on AE type, frequency, and timing is crucial for health systems considering 3HP programmatic scale-up. We reviewed AEs among people living with HIV (PLHIV) participating in a pragmatic implementation trial of facilitated 3HP taken by directly observed therapy (DOT) or self-administered therapy (SAT) in Kampala, Uganda, and classified them using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. We assessed AE timing and summarized related clinical actions including lab tests, diagnoses made, medications prescribed, and treatment interruptions. Among 1655 PLHIV treated between July 2020-September 2022, 270 (16.3%) reported 451 events; main issues included general (7%), nervous system (6%), musculoskeletal (5%), gastrointestinal (5%), and dermatologic (3%) disorders. Most (61%) occurred within 6 weeks of initiating 3HP. Among those with events, 211 (78%) required further clinician evaluation, 202 (75%) required laboratory testing, 102 (38%) had medications prescribed, 40 (15%) had treatment paused, and 14 (5%) discontinued 3HP. Women, those multidimensionally impoverished, and DOT recipients were more likely to report an AE. SAT users and later enrollees were more likely to have 3HP interrupted or stopped due to an AE. In a routine setting, 3HP was safe with 16% of PLHIV reporting AEs and only 3% requiring temporary or permanent treatment interruption. These findings support 3HP expansion in routine HIV/AIDS care settings for TB prevention.

PRO-NOVELTY: Patient-Reported Outcomes in NOse VEstibule interventionaL radioTherapY (brachytherapy).

Background: The aim of this paper is to evaluate the impact on the quality of life of the treatment of nasal vestibule tumors by interventional radiotherapy (IRT-brachytherapy) through a patient reported outcome questionnaire. Methods: We prospectively collected data about patients undergoing IRT according to our institutional schedule of 44 Gy delivered in 14 fractions twice a day. We recorded both acute toxicity data, using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0, and quality of life data, using the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) at baseline (T0), at 1 month (T1), at 3 months (T3), and at 6 months (T6). Results: We enrolled 10 consecutive patients treated between February 2023 and October 2023. The decrease in terms of SNOT-22 mean value was statistically significant from T0 and T6 with a p-value < 0.001. A noteworthy clinical finding is that quality of life improved regardless of the occurrence of G1-G2 side effects. Conclusions: Using SNOT-22 on patients with nasal vestibule carcinoma treated with IRT has shown an improvement in quality of life that is not strictly dependent on the occurrence of expected G1-G2 side effects.

Analysis of the efficacy and safety of dual immunotherapy in patients with driver gene and programmed death ligand-1 double negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Objective: To discuss the efficacy and safety of the dual immunotherapy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are double negative for driver gene and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Methods: We conducted a retrospective collection of clinical data for 61 patients with advanced NSCLC who were negative for both driver genes and PD-L1 and received dual immunotherapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from January 2019 to June 2023. Based on treatment conditions, patients were divided into first-line and non-first-line dual immunotherapy groups. Patients were followed up monthly, with the follow-up period ending on October 1, 2023. The efficacy was evaluated using Solid Tumor Response Evaluation Criteria, and adverse reactions were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events developed by the National Cancer Institute in the United States. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to compare the differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between first-line and non-first-line dual immunotherapy patients. The influence factors of PFS were analyzed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results: Among the 61 NSCLC patients, 49 were male (80.3%), with an age range of 23-88 years [(65.3±7.4) years]. There were 14 cases (23.0%) classified as stage ⅢC and 47 cases (77.0%) classified as stage Ⅳ according to TNM staging. Forty cases (65.6%) received non-first-line treatment. The objective response rate (ORR) was 24.6% (15/61), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 52.5% (32/61). All 61 patients were followed up, with a median follow-up time of 17.8 months. The median PFS was 6.0 months (95%CI: 5.5-6.4 months), and the median OS was 17.0 months (95%CI: 14.8-19.2 months). For patients receiving first-line dual immunotherapy, the median PFS was longer than for those receiving non-first-line dual immunotherapy [7.0 months (95%CI: 6.0-7.9 months) vs 4.0 months (95%CI: 3.3-4.6 months), P<0.001]; similarly, the median OS for patients receiving first-line dual immunotherapy was longer than for those receiving non-first-line dual immunotherapy [19.0 months (95%CI: 18.1-19.9 months) vs 13.0 months (95%CI: 10.8-15.1 months), P<0.001]. Multivariate Cox risk regression model analysis showed that distant tumor metastasis (HR=1.414, 95%CI: 1.253-1.725), non-first-line dual immunotherapy (HR=1.412, 95%CI: 1.184-1.652), and tumor mutation burden<10 mut/Mb (HR=1.328, 95%CI: 1.151-1.546) were risk factors for PFS, while non-squamous carcinoma (HR=0.917, 95%CI: 0.823-0.984) was a protective factor for PFS. Immune-related adverse reactions occurred in 41 cases (67.2%), including 21 cases (32.8%) of grade 3-4 adverse reactions. Eight cases (13.1%) discontinued treatment, and there were no deaths. Conclusions: Dual immunotherapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab can be a treatment option for driver gene and PD-L1 double-negative advanced NSCLC. Distant tumor metastasis, non-first-line dual immunotherapy, and tumor mutation burden<10 mut/Mb are risk factors affecting patients' PFS, while non-squamous cell carcinoma is a protective factor affecting patients' PFS.

Patient-reported outcomes in CodeBreaK 200: Sotorasib versus docetaxel for previously treated advanced NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutation

BackgroundIn the CodeBreaK 200 phase III, open-label trial, sotorasib significantly improved efficacy versus docetaxel in previously treated KRAS G12C-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for global health status, physical functioning, dyspnea, and cough favored sotorasib over docetaxel. Here, we report sotorasib’s additional impact on quality of life (QOL). MethodsIn CodeBreaK 200, 345 patients who had progressed after prior therapy received sotorasib (960 mg orally daily) or docetaxel (75 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks). Validated questionnaires captured patients’ perception of their QOL and symptom burden for key secondary and exploratory PRO endpoints, including the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Quality-of-life Questionnaire Lung Cancer 13 (EORTC QLQ-LC13), question GP5 from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Tool General Form (FACT-G GP5), PRO-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE), and 5-level EuroQOL-5 dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) including visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). Change from baseline to week 12 was assessed with generalized estimating equations for ordinal outcomes. ResultsPatients receiving sotorasib were less bothered by treatment side effects than those receiving docetaxel (odds ratio [OR] 5.7) and experienced symptoms at lower severity (pain: OR 2.9; aching muscles: OR 4.4; aching joints: OR 4.2; mouth or throat sores: OR 4.3). Further, patients’ symptoms interfered less with usual/daily activities (pain: OR 3.2; aching muscles: OR 3.9; aching joints: OR 10.7). QOL remained stable with sotorasib but worsened with docetaxel (change from baseline in EQ-5D VAS score: 1.5 vs –8.4 at cycle 1 day 5 and 2.2 vs –5.8 at week 12). ConclusionsPatients receiving sotorasib reported less severe symptoms than those receiving docetaxel. In addition to improving clinical efficacy outcomes, sotorasib maintained QOL versus docetaxel, suggesting sotorasib may be a more tolerable treatment option for patients with pretreated, KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC.

The Safety of Intraoperative Photodynamic Diagnosis Using 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Combined with Talaporfin Sodium Photodynamic Therapy in Recurrent High-Grade Glioma

Intraoperative photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) using 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) is a widely adopted technique to enhance the extent of resection during high-grade glioma (HGG) surgery. Recent updates to the package insert for 5-ALA in Japan now allow its use in combination with drugs that may induce photosensitivity, such as talaporfin sodium (TS). TS is employed in intraoperative photodynamic therapy (PDT) and has been shown to improve overall survival. The combination of 5-ALA with TS is expected to offer further benefits. However, the safety of this combination had not been established. This study reports on the safety of 5-ALA-PDD with TS-PDT in the treatment of recurrent HGG. 7 patients with recurrent HGG underwent tumor resection using a combination of 5-ALA-PDD and TS-PDT. The incidence of photosensitivity as an adverse effect associated with 5-ALA and TS was evaluated as described in the package insert. Adverse events were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Tumor-specific fluorescence intensity was strong in 4 cases and weak in 3. Photosensitivity occurred in only 1 patient (14.3%). Three patients exhibited CTCAE grade 1 or 2 abnormal liver function, and 1 patient experienced CTCAE grade 1 γ-GTP elevation. All abnormalities improved during follow-up. The combined use of 5-ALA-PDD and TS-PDT for HGG surgery did not increase the risk of serious adverse events in our study. Further investigations with a larger number of cases are needed for a more accurate assessment of its safety and efficacy.

45 INTerpath-004: A phase 2, randomized, double-blind study of pembrolizumab with V940 (mRNA-4157) or placebo in the adjuvant treatment of renal cell carcinoma

Abstract Background The PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab is approved as monotherapy for the adjuvant treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who are at increased risk of recurrence following nephrectomy or nephrectomy and resection of metastatic lesions based on results from the phase 3 KEYNOTE-564 trial. Novel combination strategies could provide further clinical benefit in the adjuvant setting. V940 (mRNA-4157) is an individualized neoantigen therapy that is hypothesized to increase the antitumor activity of T cells and enhance the activity of pembrolizumab. V940 plus pembrolizumab showed improved clinical outcomes for stage III/IV melanoma compared with pembrolizumab alone in the phase 2b KEYNOTE-942 study. INTerpath-004 is a global, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial (NCT06307431) designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant pembrolizumab with V940 or placebo in patients with RCC who have undergone nephrectomy. Methods Eligible patients are adults with histologically or cytologically confirmed RCC with clear cell or papillary histology (intermediate-high risk [pT2 Gr4, N0, M0 or pT3 Gr3/4, N0, M0], high-risk [pT4, N0, M0 or pT any stage, N1, M0], or M1 NED [solid, isolated, soft tissue metastases that can be completely resected at the time of nephrectomy or ≤2 years from nephrectomy]) with or without sarcomatoid features. Patients must have undergone nephrectomy and/or metastasectomy ≤12 weeks prior to randomization and be tumor-free as assessed by investigator. Patients must not have received prior systemic therapy ≤4 weeks or radiotherapy ≤2 weeks prior to randomization. Approximately 272 patients will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pembrolizumab 400 mg intravenously every 6 weeks for up to 9 cycles in combination with either V940 1 mg or placebo intramuscularly every 3 weeks for up to 9 doses or treatment discontinuation due to unacceptable toxicity, disease recurrence, patient withdrawal, or investigator decision. Randomization will be stratified by histology (clear cell vs papillary) and disease risk (intermediate-high vs high vs M1 NED). Imaging assessments (computed tomography or magnetic resonance imagery) will be performed every 12 weeks through year 2, every 16 weeks in years 3-5, and every 24 weeks in year 6 and beyond. The primary endpoint is disease-free survival by investigator assessment. Secondary endpoints include distant metastasis-free survival, overall survival, and safety parameters including adverse events (AEs), laboratory test results, and vital signs. AEs will be monitored throughout the study and for 30 days after the last dose of treatment (90 for serious AEs) and graded per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Efficacy will be assessed in all randomly assigned patients, and safety will be assessed in all patients who received ≥1 dose of study intervention. Recruitment is ongoing.

39 Safety profile of belzutifan monotherapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma: A pooled analysis of 4 clinical trials

Abstract Background The first-in-class hypoxia-inducible factor-2α inhibitor, belzutifan, is indicated in the United States for the treatment of certain patients with von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease–associated renal cell carcinoma (RCC), central nervous system hemangioblastomas, or pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors not requiring immediate surgery and for patients with advanced RCC previously treated with a PD-(L)1 inhibitor and a vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Due to its unique mechanism of action, belzutifan has a distinct safety profile. We characterized the safety profile of belzutifan monotherapy in a post hoc pooled analysis of patients with previously treated advanced clear cell RCC in the phase 1 LITESPARK-001 (NCT02974738), phase 3 LITESPARK-005 (NCT04195750), and phase 2 LITESPARK-013 (NCT04489771) studies and patients with RCC associated with VHL disease in the phase 2 LITESPARK-004 study (NCT03401788). Methods All patients who received ≥1 dose of belzutifan 120 mg orally once daily across the 4 studies were included. Severity of adverse events (AEs) were graded per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03 or 5.0, and were descriptively summarized. Results A total of 576 patients were included (n = 58 [including 3 patients with advanced solid tumors other than RCC], LITESPARK-001; n = 381, LITESPARK-005; n = 76, LITESPARK-013; and n = 61, LITESPARK-004). Overall, 572 patients (99.3%) had ≥1 all-cause AE and 355 patients (61.6%) had ≥1 grade 3-5 AE. AEs led to dose modification (reduction, interruption, or discontinuation) in 288 patients (50.0%), although treatment discontinuation for AEs occurred in 37 patients (6.4%). The most common all-grade AEs were anemia (including patients with decreased hemoglobin; n = 485 [84.2%]; grade 3 or 4, n = 166 [28.8%]), fatigue (n = 246 [42.7%]; grade 3, n = 16 [2.8%]), nausea (n = 139 [24.1%]; grade 3, n = 5 [0.9%]), and dyspnea (n = 123 [21.4%]; grade 3 or 4, n = 10 [1.7%]). Hypoxia was reported in 94 patients (16.3%); grade 3 or 4 hypoxia occurred in 57 patients (9.9%). Summary and time to first onset of adverse drug reactions (AEs considered associated with belzutifan), including anemia and hypoxia, are reported in the table. Among 485 patients with anemia or decreased hemoglobin, 111 (22.9%) were treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) only, 85 (17.5%) were treated with blood transfusions only, and 62 (12.8%) were treated with ESA and blood transfusions. Among 94 patients with hypoxia, 66 (70.2%) were treated with oxygen therapy. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 526 patients (91.3%) and 217 (37.7%) experienced a grade 3-5 treatment-related AE. One grade 5 adverse event (multiple organ dysfunction syndrome) was considered related to treatment. Conclusions To date, this is the largest pooled safety dataset for belzutifan monotherapy in patients with RCC. The results provide an in-depth characterization of the safety profile for belzutifan and the associated AE management strategies.

Blood biomarkers for neuroaxonal injury and astrocytic activation in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a troublesome side effect in patients exposed to taxanes in the treatment of cancer and may affect quality of life dramatically. Here we assessed whether serum levels of neurofilament light (NfL) and tau (two neuroaxonal injury biomarkers) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP, a biomarker for astrocytic activation) correlate with the development of CIPN in the adjuvant setting of early breast cancer. Using ultrasensitive single molecule array technology, serum levels of NfL, GFAP, and tau were measured before and every 3 weeks in 10 women receiving adjuvant EC (epirubicin 90 mg/m² and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m²) every 3 weeks × 3, followed by weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m² × 9-12 weeks after surgery due to early breast cancer. CIPN was graded according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0) and the questionnaire EORTC QLQ CIPN-20. Serum levels of GFAP increased successively during cycles of EC. NfL increased instead in response to the treatment of paclitaxel. NfL and GFAP continued to rise throughout exposure of cumulatively higher doses of paclitaxel and were reduced 3 months after the end of chemotherapy. Serums levels of tau were marginally affected by exposure to chemotherapy. Women with worse symptoms of CIPN had higher concentrations of NfL than women with mild symptoms of CIPN. NfL and GFAP are promising biomarkers to identify women at risk of developing CIPN. Larger prospective studies are now needed.

The relationship of mental health symptoms to chemotherapy toxicity risk in older adults with cancer: Results from the geriatric assessment-driven intervention study.

Depression and anxiety are prevalent in older adults with cancer but are often undertreated. Older adults are also at increased risk of chemotherapy toxicity (CT). This study evaluated the impact of depression and anxiety symptoms on severe CT risk in older adults with cancer. This is a secondary analysis of a randomized trial (2:1) evaluating geriatric assessment-driven intervention (GAIN) versus standard of care (SOC) to reduce grade 3+ CT in older adults with cancer. Mental health was assessed via the Mental Health Inventory 13. CT was graded by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. A total of 605 patients enrolled (402 GAIN; 203 SOC). Overall, 35% were depressed and 47% were anxious. Patients with depression had increased CT in the SOC arm (70.7% vs. 54.3%; p=.02) but not in the GAIN arm (54.3% vs. 48.5%; p=.27). CT was more likely in SOC patients with depression (odds ratio [OR], 2.03; 95% CI, 1.10-3.72). This association persisted after adjusting for Cancer and Aging Research Group toxicity score (OR,1.98; 95% CI, 1.07-3.65) and for demographic, disease, and treatment factors (OR,2.00; 95% CI, 1.03-3.85). Depression and CT were not associated in the GAIN arm (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.84-1.91). Anxiety and CT were not associated in either arm. Elevated depression symptoms are associated with increased risk of severe CT in older adults with cancer, which was mitigated with GAIN. This suggests that treating depression symptoms may lower toxicity risk. Future studies are needed to confirm and investigate the impact of depression-specific interventions on outcomes.

Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Evaluating Nerve Damage Following Chemotherapy

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a substantial adverse effect of anticancer treatments. As such, the assessment of CIPN remains critically important in both research and clinic settings. To compare the validity of various patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with neurophysiological and sensory functional measures as the optimal method of CIPN assessment. This cohort study evaluated participants treated with neurotoxic chemotherapy across 2 cohorts using a dual-study design. Participants commencing treatment were assessed prospectively at beginning of neurotoxic treatment, midtreatment, and at the end of treatment. Participants who completed treatment up to 5 years prior were assessed cross-sectionally and completed a single assessment time point. Participants were recruited from oncology centers in Australia from August 2015 to November 2022. Data analysis occurred from February to November 2023. Neurotoxic cancer treatment including taxanes, platinums, vinca-alkaloids, proteasome inhibitors, and thalidomide. CIPN was assessed via PROMs (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC-CIPN20], Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecological Cancer Group Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (FACT/GOG-Ntx), and the patient-reported outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [PRO-CTCAE]), neurological and neurophysiological assessment (Total Neuropathy Score and sural and tibial compound nerve amplitudes), and sensory measures (Grating orientation, Von Frey monofilament, and 2-point discrimination tasks). Core measurement properties of CIPN outcome measures were evaluated. Convergent and known-groups validity was assessed cross-sectionally following treatment completion, and responsiveness was evaluated prospectively during treatment. Neurological, neurophysiological, and sensory outcome measure scores were compared between those who reported high and low levels of CIPN symptoms using linear regressions. A total of 1033 participants (median [IQR] age, 61 [50-59] years; 676 female [65.4%]) were recruited to this study, incorporating 1623 assessments. PROMs demonstrated best ability to accurately assess CIPN (convergent validity), especially the PRO-CTCAE composite score (r = 0.85; P < .001) and EORTC-CIPN20 (r = 0.79; P < .001). PROMS also demonstrated the best ability to discriminate between CIPN severity (known-groups validity) and to detect changes at onset of CIPN development (responsiveness), especially for EORTC-CIPN20 (d = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52-0.83), FACT/GOG-Ntx (d = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49-0.81) and the PRO-CTCAE (d = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.64-1.02). Other measures did not achieve threshold for convergent validity (α < 0.7). Neurophysiological and sensory measures did not demonstrate acceptable responsiveness. In regression models, neurological, neurophysiological, and sensory outcome measures were significantly impaired in participants who reported high levels of CIPN symptoms compared with those who reported low levels of CIPN symptoms. In this cohort study of 1033 cancer patients, PROMs were the only measures to satisfy all 3 core measurement property criteria (convergent validity, known-groups validity, and responsiveness). These findings suggest that adoption of PROMs in clinical practice can equip clinicians with valuable information in assessing CIPN morbidity.

Delphi study for developing a checklist of adverse events associated with acupotomy

BackgroundAcupotomy, a more invasive procedure than acupuncture, involves the use of a thicker needle with an integrated knife at the tip, necessitating safety research. We aimed to define relevant adverse events (AEs) and create a standardized form of the ACUPOtomy-related AEs CHECKlist (ACUPOCHECK). MethodsBefore conducting the Delphi process, a systematic review and pilot prospective study were conducted to gather information on previously reported AEs. Using these data, pilot versions of the ACUPOCHECK and Delphi questionnaires were developed. The Delphi questionnaire involved selecting types of AE for inclusion, establishing separate criteria for acupotomy-related AEs, and achieving a consensus on AE assessment. Thirteen Korean doctors with experience in acupotomy or AE research were recruited to participate in each Delphi round. Consensus was considered to have been reached if the critical value for the content validity ratio met or exceeded 0.538. ResultsThe final ACUPOCHECK was developed using four rounds of the Delphi method and one face-to-face consensus meeting. It included 12 local AEs (pain, hemorrhage, bruise, hematoma, edema, pruritus, rash, infection, nerve damage, dysesthesia, movement impairment, and pneumothorax) and 14 systemic AEs (disease aggravation, needle fatigue, sleepiness, procedural nausea, procedural vomiting, procedural headache, procedural dizziness, sweating, procedural shock, syncope, dyspnea, procedural pain, sleep disorder, and postprocedural infection). Separate criteria were established for pain, hemorrhage and bruising: pain was defined as pain that occurrs during daily activities and persists for longer than 72 h, hemorrhage as bleeding that continues for ≥ 3 min despite pressure application, and bruising as having a bruise with a diameter of ≥ 3 cm. Open-ended descriptions were allowed for AEs not covered by the checklist, and severity and causality were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and modified World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Center criteria. ConclusionACUPOCHECK provides a standardization framework that can help research on traditional practices as well as new tools and techniques that are more invasive and may cause more severe AEs. Subsequent studies will use ACUPOCHECK to develop rational safety guidelines for acupotomy techniques.Please cite this article as: Jun H, Lee H, Yoon SH, Kwon CY, Jeon D, Lee JH, Leem J. Delphi study for developing a checklist of adverse events associated with acupotomy. J Integr Med. 2024; 22(5): 579–587.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of toceranib phosphate in cats with macroscopic mammary adenocarcinoma.

Mammary tumours in cats are biologically aggressive. The standard of care relies upon wide surgical resection. Chemotherapy has been described in the macroscopic disease setting; however, limited efficacy has been shown. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of toceranib phosphate in macroscopic feline mammary tumours (FMTs). A total of 17 cats with cytologically or histopathologically confirmed mammary adenocarcinoma (gross disease) were prospectively enrolled. Toceranib phosphate was administered at a median dose of 2.77 mg/kg (range 2.3-3.2) PO q48 h. No corticosteroids or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were administered. Toxicity was graded according to Veterinary Cooperative Oncology Group-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (VCOG-CTCAE) v1.1 criteria. The response was assessed after 1 month, following Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST) criteria. Toxicity was observed in eight cats, with most instances being grade 1 or 2, which were managed with supportive care. Only one cat experienced grade 3 toxicity (anorexia), which resolved after a dose reduction. Clinical benefit was seen in 12 (64.7%) cats and an objective response was seen in six (35.2%) cats. One cat experienced complete response, five had partial response, six had stable disease and five had progressive disease. One cat showed distant progression (malignant pleural effusion) despite continued partial remission of the primary tumour. The median progression-free survival and median overall survival time were 91 days (range 30-158) and 145 days (range 31-234), respectively. Toceranib phosphate showed clinical benefit and a good safety profile in advanced or recurrent FMTs, offering a new alternative in the treatment of this disease; however, further prospective and randomised studies are required to further assess its efficacy. Interestingly, one cat developed distant metastases while the primary tumour showed partial response, suggesting that primary tumour and metastatic disease may not sustain the same sensitivity to toceranib.

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT-Guided, Metastasis-Directed Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Systemic treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) include androgen deprivation therapy, androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, chemotherapy, and radiopharmaceuticals, all of which have associated toxicity. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT allows for higher sensitivity in detecting metastatic disease than is possible with conventional imaging. We hypothesized that PSMA PET/CT-guided, metastasis-directed radiotherapy may offer durable disease control with low toxicity rates in patients with mCRPC who have a limited number of metastases. Methods: We retrospectively screened 5 prospective PSMA PET/CT studies for patients with mCRPC who had up to 5 sites of oligorecurrent or oligoprogressive disease on PSMA PET/CT and subsequently received definitive-intent, metastasis-directed radiotherapy to all new or progressing sites with concurrent androgen deprivation therapy. Progression-free survival, freedom from new lines of systemic therapy, and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the start of metastasis-directed radiotherapy using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Biochemical response was defined as at least a 50% decrease in prostate-specific antigen 6 mo after the start of treatment. Toxicity was graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5. Results: Twenty-four patients met the inclusion criteria with a median follow-up of 33.8 mo (interquartile range, 27.6-45.1 mo). Between October 2017 and April 2023, 11 patients (45.8%) had 1 treated site, 10 patients (41.7%) had 2, and 3 patients (12.5%) had 3. Five sites were prostate or prostate bed, 15 were nodal, 19 were osseous, and 1 was visceral. Seventeen patients (70.8%) continued their preexisting systemic therapy, whereas 7 (29.2%) started a new systemic therapy. Median progression-free survival was 16.4 mo (95% CI, 9.8-23.0 mo). The biochemical response rate was 66.7%. Median freedom from a new line of systemic therapy was 29.0 mo (95% CI, 7.6-50.4 mo). Median OS was not reached. The 2- and 4-y OS rates were 91.1% (95% CI, 79.3%-100%) and 68.8% (95% CI, 45.1%-92.5%), respectively. Grade 2 and grade 3 or higher toxicity rates were 4.2% and 0%, respectively. Conclusion: PSMA PET/CT-guided, metastasis-directed radiotherapy appears to offer durable disease control with low toxicity rates for oligometastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Further prospective studies are needed to compare metastasis-directed radiotherapy with systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone and PSMA PET/CT-guided versus conventional imaging-guided radiotherapy.

Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety of Microwave Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases Adjacent versus Nonadjacent to the Diaphragm

PurposeTo compare the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) for colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) adjacent versus nonadjacent to the diaphragm. Materials and MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively created MWA database, from 2 prospective clinical trials for patients with CLM treated in a single tertiary center from 2012 to 2023. CLM adjacent to the diaphragm was defined as a tumor located <1 cm from the diaphragm. Minimal ablation margin (MM) was calculated with 3-dimensional software using postablation contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). Adverse events were assessed with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 classification for 6 months. ResultsTwo hundred nine CLMs underwent 191 MWA sessions in 143 patients. Mean tumor diameter was 1.52 cm (SD ± 0.53). Eighty-three of 209 (39.7%) CLMs were adjacent to the diaphragm. There was no difference in local tumor progression–free survival (LTPFS) between CLMs adjacent and nonadjacent to the diaphragm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.37–1.16; P = .15). MMs of 5–10 mm and >10 mm were documented in 49.3% versus 46.8% (P = .83) and 21.6% versus 12.6% (P = .16) for CLMs adjacent versus nonadjacent to the diaphragm, respectively. Twelve-month LTPFS was similar between groups (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.37–1.16; P = .15) without local tumor progression for MM of >10 mm. There were 3 Grade IV adverse events: 1 diaphragmatic perforation, 1 liver abscess, and 1 biloma. Pneumothorax was associated with location adjacent to the diaphragm (P < .001) and transpulmonary approach (P < .001). Median length of hospital stay was 2 days (interquartile range [IQR], 1–3 days) for patients who needed thoracostomy (n = 20, 9.6%) compared with 1 day (IQR, 1–8 days) for those who did not, without long-term sequelae. ConclusionsMWA of CLM adjacent to the diaphragm is effective and safe, without difference in success and 12-month LTPFS. Pneumothorax was associated with location adjacent to the diaphragm and thoracostomy that resulted in longer hospitalization without long-term sequelae.

Irreversible Electroporation in Treating Colorectal Liver Metastases in Proximity to Critical Structures

PurposeTo evaluate the safety, efficacy, and oncological outcomes of irreversible electroporation (IRE) of unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) close to critical structures. Materials and MethodsThis is a single-center, institutional review board (IRB)–approved, retrospective analysis of patients who underwent percutaneous computed tomography (CT)–guided IRE of CRLM. Between August 2018 and October 2023, 26 patients had 46 tumors treated with percutaneous IRE in 30 ablation sessions. Primary end points were tumor response and local progression-free survival analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Secondary end points were overall survival (OS), distant progression-free survival (DPFS) analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, adverse events rated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), and length of hospital stay. ResultsAll tumors were close to critical structures, including the portal and hepatic veins, inferior vena cava, bile ducts, and gallbladder. All patients received preprocedural systemic therapy (median 10 cycles). Median length of hospital stay was 1 night. Adverse events occurred in 7 (23%) of 30 procedures, with four Grade 1 and two Grade 2 adverse events, including pleural effusions (n = 2), ileus (n = 1), small hematoma (n = 1), and pneumothorax (n = 2) requiring chest tube placements. Following IRE, the 1- and 2-year local tumor progression-free survival rates were 55.0% and 51.3%. The median DPFS was 3.5 months, with 1- and 2-year DPFS rates of 23.3% and 9.7%. Six patients (23.1%) died during follow-up, with a median OS of 40.4 months. The 1- and 2-year OS rates were 90.9% and 83.9%. ConclusionsIRE is a safe and viable option in the treatment of unresectable CRLMs in locations close to critical structures, but carries a risk of local recurrence.