e24065 Background: While hospice care offers many patients services promoting comfort and quality of life, the traditional hospice model described in Medicare policy presents numerous barriers to utilization. Notably, since hospice pays for all therapies related to a terminal illness, patients are often forced to make a difficult choice to stop disease-directed therapies in order to enroll in hospice. Poor provider understanding of hospice also contributes to the common scenario in which hospice is offered too late to make a meaningful impact for patients and their families. These issues were prominent in the VA population in 2006, when only 5% of eligible Veterans received hospice services. Consequently, the VA Comprehensive End-of-Life Care Initiative in 2009 created the concurrent care hospice model in where Veterans no longer had to stop all disease-directed therapies to enroll. Initial national VA data in lung cancer suggested that concurrent care may be better than traditional hospice by decreasing aggressive treatments, ICU hospitalizations, and medical costs. Our regional VA developed a Hospice Flag system that tagged patients in the electronic medical record who had either a concurrent or traditional hospice enrollment to better inform health care providers. This project investigates how the concurrent care hospice model may help achieve an important Veteran-centered outcome, which is to die in the home setting and improve access to hospice care. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all Veterans with a hospice flag from October 2017 to July 2021 and cancer as the primary hospice diagnosis. Our primary aim was to establish correlation between hospice type and Veterans’ ultimate location of death with the percentage at home versus institution (e.g. care center, hospital, or hospice house). A secondary measure was median length-of-stay (LOS) in hospice. Results: 317 total Veterans were enrolled in concurrent care hospice (96) and traditional hospice (221) from Oct 2017 to July 2021. 72% of Veterans in concurrent care (69/96) died at home compared to only 57% in traditional hospice (125/221) with the remainder dying in an institution; this result was statistically significant by Chi-square analysis (p = 0.01). Median LOS in hospice was 62 days for concurrent care and 26 days for traditional hospice. Conclusions: This project demonstrates that concurrent care hospice is significantly associated with Veterans being able to die in their own home. Concurrent care was also correlated with longer median LOS in hospice, suggesting greater duration of support services provided to patients and families.