Terms Of Oncological Outcomes Research Articles

Stereotactic Radiation Therapy versus Brachytherapy: Relative Strengths of Two Highly Efficient Options for the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer.

Simple SummaryStereotactic radiation therapy consists of delivering ablative ultra-high doses of radiation to a precise target in a very limited number of fractions. Because of its ability to drastically shorten treatment duration and its potential radiobiological advantage, interest in this technique for the treatment of localized prostate cancer has increased over the past decade. At the same time, brachytherapy remains a time-tested technique that has excellent, proven outcomes with a very long follow-up, setting a standard of treatment for all subsets of the disease and a reference against which emerging techniques should be compared. We propose a critical literature review to report on the respective levels of evidence of stereotactic radiation therapy and brachytherapy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer.Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become a valid option for the treatment of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. In randomized trials, it was found not inferior to conventionally fractionated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). It also compares favorably to brachytherapy (BT) even if level 1 evidence is lacking. However, BT remains a strong competitor, especially for young patients, as series with 10–15 years of median follow-up have proven its efficacy over time. SBRT will thus have to confirm its effectiveness over the long-term as well. SBRT has the advantage over BT of less acute urinary toxicity and, more hypothetically, less sexual impairment. Data are limited regarding SBRT for high-risk disease while BT, as a boost after EBRT, has demonstrated superiority against EBRT alone in randomized trials. However, patients should be informed of significant urinary toxicity. SBRT is under investigation in strategies of treatment intensification such as combination of EBRT plus SBRT boost or focal dose escalation to the tumor site within the prostate. Our goal was to examine respective levels of evidence of SBRT and BT for the treatment of localized prostate cancer in terms of oncologic outcomes, toxicity and quality of life, and to discuss strategies of treatment intensification.

Outcome of Non-Muscle Invasive Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Receiving Endoscopic Ablation: An Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Analysis.

We compared the outcomes in early-stage upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients receiving endoscopic ablation (EA) with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). From 2004 to 2018, cTa/T1N0M0 UTUC patients undergoing EA and RNU were enrolled. For reducing observational bias, propensity scores based on inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were utilized for comparing the oncologic outcomes and renal function changes. In total, 65 of 184 cTa/T1 UTUC patients were analyzed after exclusion of 119 patients with end-stage renal disease, and lack of previous ureteroscopic biopsy. The studied patients included 23 who received EA and 42 RNU, and both groups were well balanced after adjusting with IPTW. The median follow-up period was 43.6 months. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of oncological outcome. The EA group exhibited less estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline one year later (0.0% vs. 20.2%, p < 0.001) and less worsening of chronic kidney status (13.2% vs. 46.5%, p = 0.026). Among patients receiving EA, high-grade tumors exhibited higher subsequent recurrence in the residual urinary tract than did the low-grade ones. (p = 0.037). In summary, endoscopic ablation preserves renal function without compromising oncological outcome in selected UTUC patients. High-grade tumors should be strictly followed up following endoscopic ablation.

Impact of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy on primary tumor size and complexity: Correlation with surgical quality and short term oncological outcomes.

390 Background:The concept of primary systemic therapy has gained increasing traction in the management of metastatic and locally advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC). Most series have evaluated the use of tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, however, with the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy as first line agents in advanced RCC, further assessment of efficacy is warranted. We examined the effects of immunotherapy (IO) combinations on the primary tumor and consequent surgical quality and short-term oncological outcomes. Methods: We conducted a multi-center, retrospective analysis of patients with advanced/metastatic RCC having received IO followed by Radical (RN) or partial nephrectomy (PN). Primary outcome was achievement of Bifecta (composite outcome of complete resection and no 30-day post-operative complications). Predictors for achievement of Bifecta were assessed with logistic regression multivariable analysis. Secondary outcomes were change in maximal tumor dimension, RENAL nephrometry score and disease progression. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess progression-free survival (PFS) for Bifecta and non-Bifecta patients. Results: We identified 52 patients with advanced RCC across 9 institutions who were eligible. The median age was 63 years and 60.4% were males. Median tumor size at diagnosis was 9.3 cm. 19.6% had T4 disease and 75% had AJCC Stage IV disease. IO treatment resulted in significant reductions in median tumor size (-25.4%; 9.7 cm vs. 7.3cm p = 0.0129) and RENAL nephrometry score (9 to 8, p = 0.032). 43 (83%) of patients underwent RN and (9) 17% had PN. Median tumor size was smaller for PN (8 vs. 4.1 cm, p &lt; 0.001), and 30 day complication rates were higher (p = 0.024). Bifecta was achieved in 39 patients [33/42 (78.6%) RN and 6/9 (67%) PN, p = 0.264). Predictors for achievement of Bifecta were younger age (OR 1.06, p = 0.01), increasing reduction in tumor size (OR 1.187, p &lt; 0.001), and shorter time between therapy and surgery (OR 1.07, p &lt; 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated longer median time to progression in the Bifecta-positive group compared to patients who failed to achieve Bifecta (75 vs. 30 months, p = 0.04). Conclusions: Pre-surgical therapy resulted in tumor size and complexity reduction. Tumor size reduction was predictive for achievement of Bifecta, which was associated with improved short term oncological outcomes. To our knowledge, this is the first series evaluating the effect of neoadjuvant systemic therapy on the primary tumor prior to surgical intervention.

Impacts of Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy Prior to Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy on Postoperative Hormonal- and Sexual-Related Quality of Life - Assessment by Patient-Reported Questionnaire.

PurposeNeoadjuvant hormonal therapy (HT) before radical prostatectomy (RP) is not recommended by current guidelines in terms of oncological outcomes. Despite this, neoadjuvant HT is sometimes conducted before RP for a small proportion of patients in clinical practice. This study evaluated the impacts of neoadjuvant HT on hormonal- and sexual-related quality of life (QOL) among patients who underwent robot-assisted RP (RARP).Materials and MethodsParticipants comprised 470 patients divided into a non-neoadjuvant HT group (n = 408) and a neoadjuvant HT group (n = 62). Hormonal- and sexual-related QOL were measured using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire.ResultsHormonal summary scores at 6 and 9 months, function scores before and 3, 6, and 9 months and bother score at 6 months after RARP were significantly lower in the neoadjuvant HT group than in the non-neoadjuvant HT group. Sexual function scores were decreased in the neoadjuvant HT group compared to the non-neoadjuvant HT group before and 6 months after RARP. In the neoadjuvant HT group, sexual function at 3 months after RARP was significantly worse in patients with >5 months of neoadjuvant HT than in patients with ≤5 months of neoadjuvant HT. Conversely, sexual bother at 3 months after RARP was significantly worse in patients with ≤5 months of neoadjuvant HT than in patients with >5 months of neoadjuvant HT.ConclusionVintage neoadjuvant HT prior to RARP should not be recommended due to not only oncological outcomes, but also the impacts on postoperative hormonal- and sexual-related QOL.

Long term oncologic and reproductive outcomes after robot-assisted radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. An international multicenter study

ObjectivesLong term outcomes following fertility sparing robot-assisted radical trachelectomy (RRT). MethodsA retrospective study of consecutive women selected for RRT between 2007 and 2019 at five referral centres. Generally used selection criteria for fertility-sparing surgery were applied. Oncologic, reproductive and long-term clinical data were analysed. ResultsOf the 166 included women, 149 completed a RRT. Median tumor size was 9 mm (range 3-20 mm), 111 women (75%) had FIGO 2009 stage IB1 cancer and 4.8% were node positive. At a median follow up of 58 months, 12 of all women (7.2%) and 9 of 149 women (6%) who underwent completed RRT with fertility preservation had recurred and two had died. 70 of 88 women (80%) who attempted to conceive succeeded, resulting in 81 pregnancies that progressed beyond the first trimester and 76 live births of which 54 (70%) were delivered at term and 65 (86%) delivered after gestational week 32. A short postoperative cervical length was associated with impaired fertility. A late secondary hysterectomy was necessary in four women due to persistent bleeding (n = 2), hematometra due to a cervical stenosis (n = 1) and recurrent dysplasia (n = 1). ConclusionIn this long-term follow-up of RRT the recurrence rate is comparable to larger individual studies of minimally invasive or vaginal radical trachelectomy with similar risk profile and follow up. The high pregnancy rate and low rate of premature delivery before 32 weeks GA may promote the use of robot-assisted approach.

Minimally invasive surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review.

BACKGROUNDIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer and is characterized by an aggressive behavior and a dismal prognosis. Radical surgical resection represents the only potentially curative treatment. Despite the increasing acceptance of laparoscopic liver resection for surgical treatment of malignant liver diseases, its use for ICC is not commonly performed. In fact, to achieve surgical free margins a major resection and/or vascular and/or biliary reconstructions is often needed, as well as an associated lymph node dissection.AIMTo review and summarize the current evidences on the minimally invasive resection of ICC.METHODSA systematic review of the literature based on the criteria predetermined by the investigators was performed from the 1st of January 2009 up to the 1st of January 2021 in 4 databases (PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases). All retrospective and prospective studies reporting on the comparative outcomes of open vs minimally invasive treatment of ICC were included. An evaluation of manuscripts quality was achieved using Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTSAfter a systematic search 9 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Among the all 3012 included patients, 2450 were operated by an open approach and 562 by a minimally invasive (laparoscopic) approach. Baseline characteristics, tumor characteristics, surgical outcomes and oncological outcomes were collected and analyzed, highlighting values with a statistical significant difference between patients treated with open or laparoscopic approach. Shorter hospital stay and lower intraoperative blood losses were reported by some Authors in minimally invasive surgery, on the contrary, in the open group there was a higher number of lymphadenectomies and a higher percentage of major hepatectomies.CONCLUSIONMinimally invasive resection of ICC has some short-term benefits and it is safe and feasible only in selected centers with a high experience in laparoscopic approach for liver surgery. Minimally invasive surgery, actually, was considered mainly in patients with a tumor with a diameter < 5 cm, without invasion of main biliary duct or main vessel and no vascular or biliary reconstructions were planned. Further studies are needed to elucidate its impact on long term oncologic outcomes.

Oncologic Outcomes Following Positive Surgical Margins in Patients who Underwent Open Versus.

To evaluate oncological outcomes in patient with positive surgical margin (PSM) following partial nephrectomy (PN). In this retrospective study, we enrolled the data of patients who underwent PN between 2008 and 2017. The inclusion criteria were a definite diagnosis of kidney tumor who underwent PN with at least one year follow up. From the 450 patients who underwent PN, The PSM was found in 35 (22 male/13 female) patients. 18/237 (7.6%) and 17/213 (7.9%) of them were in open and laparoscopic group, respectively. Clear cell RCC was the most prevalent pathology (18 patients) in the PSM patients. The mean time of follow up was 46±2.02 months. Recurrence was developed in 5 (14.2%) patients. There was no correlation between recurrence and sex (p=1.00), surgery type (p=0.658), age (p=0.869), tumor size (p= 0.069), pathology (p=0.258) and stage (p=0.744) in PSM patients. Recurrence free survival was similar between the open and laparoscopy groups in PSM patients (p=0.619). Beside numerous advantages of minimally invasive techniques, laparoscopic approach would be comparable to conventional open partial nephrectomy in terms of oncologic outcomes. The rate of recurrence following partial nephrectomy in PSM patients is considerable and closely monitoring is mandatory.

Stereotactic Re-irradiation in Recurrent Prostate Cancer after Previous Postoperative or Definitive Radiotherapy: Long-term Results after a Median Follow-up of 4 Years

AimsIn 2018, we published early results from a cohort of patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) after previous radiotherapy with definitive or postoperative intent. We sought to provide extended follow-up of this cohort to confirm the safety and efficacy of this approach in a real-world scenario. Materials and methodsFifty patients affected by local relapse after previous definitive or postoperative radiotherapy were treated with SBRT. Treatment provided a total dose of 30 Gy in five fractions. Data about biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS), together with adverse events, were analysed. Toxicity was reported according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) score v.4.03. ResultsAfter a median follow-up of 48.2 months, the median BRFS was 43 months. A Gleason score >7 and concomitant androgen deprivation therapy were shown to be predictors of the worst BRFS (hazard ratio 2.42, 95% confidence interval 1.09–5.41, P = 0.02; hazard ratio 2.83, 95% confidence interval 1.17–6.8, P = 0.02, respectively). The median MFS was not reached; concomitant androgen deprivation therapy was confirmed to be predictive of the worst MFS (hazard ratio 4.75, 95% confidence interval 1.52–14.8, P = 0.007). Late grade 1 and 2 rectal and bladder toxicity occurred in three (6%) and 13 (26%) patients, respectively. One patient experienced both grade 3 acute and chronic bladder toxicity. ConclusionSalvage SBRT re-irradiation after previous postoperative or definitive radiotherapy for local prostate cancer recurrence confirmed promising results in terms of oncological outcomes and the safety of this approach.

Uterine Preservation Treatments in Sarcomas: Oncological Problems and Reproductive Results: A Systematic Review.

Simple SummaryUterine sarcomas can affect patients of reproductive age. In this setting, the chance of a fertility-sparing treatment would allow women to become pregnant. In the literature, only a few experiences of fertility-sparing treatment of uterine sarcomas have been reported; however, the oncological safety and reproductive outcomes remain unclear. The aim of this systematic review is to report and summarize all the published evidence about the fertility-sparing approach in these rare and heterogenous tumors, and to help physicians in making clinical decisions.Uterine sarcomas are rare cancers, sometimes diagnosed in women of childbearing age. Hysterectomy is the standard treatment in early stages. The option of lesion removal to save fertility is described in the literature, but it is still considered experimental. The objective of this systematic review is to report on the available evidence on the reproductive and oncological outcomes of fertility-sparing treatment in women with uterine sarcomas. PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched between 1 January 2011 and 21 June 2021 for publications in English about women with uterine sarcoma treated with a fertility-sparing intervention. Thirty-seven studies were included for a total of 210 patients: 63 low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, 35 embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas of the cervix, 19 adenosarcomas, 7 leiomyosarcomas and 2 uterine tumors resembling an ovarian sex cord. Conservative treatment ensured pregnancy in 32% of cases. In terms of oncological outcomes, relapse was related to histology and the worst prognosis was reported for leiomyosarcoma, followed by low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, which relapsed in 71% and 54% of cases, respectively. The highest death rate was associated with leiomyosarcoma (57.1%). This study demonstrated that fertility-sparing treatments may be employed in selected cases of early stage uterine sarcoma.

Hypofractionated preoperative radiotherapy for high risk soft tissue sarcomas in a geriatric patient population.

BackgroundStandard therapy for localised, resectable high risk soft tissue sarcomas consists of wide excision and radiotherapy over several weeks. This treatment schedule is hardly feasible in geriatric and frail patients. In order not to withhold radiotherapy from these patients, hypofractionated radiotherapy with 25 Gy in 5 fractions was evaluated in a geriatric patient population.Patients and methodsA retrospective analysis was performed of 18 geriatric patients with resectable high risk soft tissue sarcomas of extremities and thoracic wall. Wound healing and short term oncologic outcome were analysed. In addition, dose constraints for radiotherapy of the extremities were transferred from normofractionated to hypofractionated radiotherapy regimens.ResultsFeasibility was good with 17/18 patients completing treatment as planned. Wound healing complication rate was in the range of published data. Two patients developed local and distant recurrence, two patients isolated distant recurrences. No isolated local recurrences were observed. Keeping the constraints was possible in all cases without compromising the coverage of the target volume.ConclusionsHypofractionated radiotherapy and surgery was well tolerated even in this specific patient population. With feasibility concerning early wound healing problems and adapted constraints, which allow for the treatment of most resectable extremity tumours, the concept warrants further evaluation in patients unfit for standard radiotherapy.

Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy

BackgroundCurrently 4 surgical techniques are performed for transthoracic esophagectomy (open esophagectomy (OE), hybrid esophagectomy (HE), conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and robot assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE). Aim of this study was to compare these 4 different esophagectomy approaches regarding postoperative complications and short term oncologic outcomes. MethodsBetween 2008 and 2019, consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction were included in this single center study. The primary outcome of this study was the incidence of postoperative complications. ResultsOverall 422 patients (OE (n = 107), HE (n = 101), MIE (n = 91) and RAMIE (n = 123)) were evaluated. Uncomplicated postoperative course was observed in 27% (OE), 34% (HE), 53% (MIE), and 63% (RAMIE) of patients (p < 0.001). Pulmonary complications were observed in 57% (OE), 44% (HE), 28% (MIE), and 21% (RAMIE) of patients (p < 0.001). Cardiac complications were present in 25% (OE), 23% (HE), 9% (MIE), and 11% (RAMIE) of patients (p < 0.001). MIE and RAMIE were associated with fewer wound infections (p < 0.001). Median hospital stay after MIE (13 days) and RAMIE (12 days) was shorter compared to OE (20 days) and HE (17 days) (p < 0.001). A median number of 21 (OE), 23 (HE), 23 (MIE), and 31 (RAMIE) lymph nodes was harvested (p < 0.001). ConclusionTotal minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE, RAMIE) was associated with a lower overall, pulmonary, cardiac and wound complication rate as well as a shorter hospital stay compared to open or hybrid approach (OE, HE). RAMIE resulted in higher lymph node harvest than MIE.

Rectal washout during abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer has no impact on the oncological outcome.

Intraoperative rectal washout is performed to eliminate exfoliated intraluminal cancer cells and thereby decrease the risk of local recurrence. Rectal washout in abdominoperineal resection has not been studied. The aim of this study was to assess the oncological outcome after rectal washout in abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer and to find evidence as to whether rectal washout should be performed or not. Data for all patients registered in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry who underwent elective surgery with abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (TNM Stages I-III) between 2007 and 2013 were analysed using multivariable analysis. No significant differences were shown between the rectal washout group and the no rectal washout group for local recurrence [10/265 (3.8%) vs. 87/2160 (4.0%), p=0.84], distant metastasis [51/265 (19.2%) vs. 476/2160 (22.0%), p=0.29] or overall recurrence [53/265 (20.0%) vs. 505/2160 (23.4%), p=0.21]. In multivariable analysis, rectal washout did not significantly affect the oncological outcome in terms of local recurrence, distant metastasis, overall recurrence or 5-year overall or relative survival. Our results do not support routine rectal washout during abdominoperineal resection in order to improve the oncological outcome.

Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes With Intraoperative Radiation Therapy for Early Breast Cancer.

For selected patients with early-stage breast cancer (BC), intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) has emerged as a convenient alternative to standard whole breast irradiation (WBI). We report a single institution experience with IORT in terms of oncologic outcomes, toxicities, and cosmesis. Clinicopathological and perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent IORT for early-stage BC at a public hospital from 2017 to 2020 were retrospectively retrieved. Toxicity was categorized to acute or chronic based on 6 months post-IORT cutoff. 85 patients underwent IORT and had complete data, aged 49-85 years (mean 62). Intraoperative radiation therapy added 23 minutes on average to the total operative time. Final stage was 0, I, and II in 40%, 58.9%, and 1.1% of patients, respectively. Mean tumor size was 0.8cm (range .1-2.1), with ductal histology comprising 94% of cases. Surgical margins were positive in 2 patients, and adjuvant WBI was required in 5 patients. After a median follow-up of 17 months (range 3-41), none of the patients had local recurrence and no mortality was recorded. Early wound complications included wound dehiscence (n = 1), seroma/hematoma (n = 15), and re-operation with loss of nipple-areola complex (n = 1). Chronic skin toxicities were reported in 10 (12%) patients and good or excellent cosmetic outcome was reported in 93% of patients. Utilizing IORT among low-risk early BC patients may be a safe and more convenient alternative to traditional WBI, with low toxicity rate, acceptable cosmetic results, and good oncologic outcomes at 17 months. Longer follow-up and further prospective controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Laparoscopic anatomical liver resection for malignancies using positive or negative staining technique with intraoperative indocyanine green-fluorescence imaging.

Indications for a minimally invasive resections are increasing worldwide, but respecting anatomical planes during intraparenchymal transection is demanding. Intraoperative ICG fluorescence staining of liver parenchyma has been introduced as a tool for real-time intraoperative guidance. The aim of this study is to make a systematic review of the current relevant literature on indications, techniques, and results of laparoscopic anatomical liver resection (LALR) using intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence for positive and negative staining of liver segments in patients affected by liver malignancies. Electronic bibliographical databases (MEDLINE and PubMed) were searched according to the PRISMA criteria. English language articles meeting the selection criteria and published until June 2020 were retrieved and reviewed. a total of 86 articles were initially found and 11 articles were finally included in the analysis with a total of 83 patients treated. Sixty-two patients (74.6%) underwent mono-segmentectomies. Thirty-five patients (42.1%) underwent the positive staining technique, and forty-eight patients (57.8%) the negative staining technique. The positive or negative indocyanine green staining technique with real-time fluorescence guidance is an emerging and promising approach. However, the technique has to be standardized and advantages in terms of oncologic results still need validation in further studies.

EP.TU.4973 year oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal cancer resections – a single centre experience

Abstract Background Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for rectal cancer is a relatively new technique. Studies to date suggest that short term outcomes including TME quality, margin status, lymph node retrieval and 30-day morbidity and mortality are equivalent in robotic-assisted and laparoscopic MIS for rectal cancer. By contrast, there is a paucity of data on the medium and long-term oncologic safety of robotic-assisted comparative to laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of all robotic-assisted (n = 31) and laparoscopic (n = 23) rectal cancer cases performed at our institution between January 2016 to December 2018. Inclusion criteria were patients scheduled electively for a laparoscopic or robotic-assisted resection of rectal cancer (anterior resection or abdomino-perineal resection). Patients with distant metastases at presentation, those who proceeded to surgery as an emergency and those with a non-colorectal primary were excluded from analysis. Results A total of 54 (n = 54) cases met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. The median follow-up was 34 months. Of the 54, 21 patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy prior to definitive surgery. No significant difference was detected in local recurrence rates (p = 0.5), overall survival (p = 0.7) or disease-free survival (p = 0.8) between the robotic-assisted and laparoscopic cohorts. Conclusion In this series, robotic-assisted rectal cancer resections were associated with equivalent medium term oncological outcomes as laparoscopic procedures. However, given the small numbers in this cohort, outcomes from larger scale datasets will be required to confirm these results.

Extended Pleurectomy/Decortication for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Humanitas's Experience.

Background: We analysed a series of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients who consecutively underwent extended Pleurectomy/Decortication (eP/D) in a centre with a high level of thoracic surgery experience (IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital) to explore postoperative morbidity and mortality, pattern of recurrence and survival. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on MPM patients underwent eP/D in our centre from 2010 to 2021. All patients were identified from our departmental database. Postoperative complications were scored according to Clavien–Dindo criteria. Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan–Meier methods and Cox multivariable analysis. Results: Eighty-five patients underwent extended pleurectomy decortication (eP/D) during study period. Macroscopical residual disease (R2) was reported in one case. A neoadjuvant chemotherapy regiment was administrated in 88% of the surgical cohort. A complete trimodality treatment including induction with platinum agents and pemetrexed, radical cytoreductive surgery and volumetric modulated arc therapy technology (VMAT) could be administered in 63 patients (74%). Postoperative morbidity rate was 54.11%, major complications (defined as Clavien–Dindo ≥ 3) were reported in 11 patients (12.9%). Thirty-day mortality and 90-day mortality were, respectively, 2.35% and 3.53%. Median disease-free and overall survival were, respectively, 13.7 and 25.5 months. The occurrence of major complications (Clavien–Dindo ≥ 3), operative time, pT3–T4, pathological node involvement (pN+) were prognostic factors associated with worse survival. Conclusions: In our experience, eP/D is a well-tolerated procedure with acceptable mortality and morbidity, allowing for the administration of trimodality regimens in most patients. eP/D offered in a multimodality treatment setting have satisfactory long term oncological results. To obtain best oncological results the goal of surgery should be macroscopic complete resection in carefully selected patients (clinical N0).

Transoral videolaryngoscopic surgery for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer―Technical updates and long-term results

Abstract Objective Transoral videolaryngoscopic surgery (TOVS) was developed as a non-robotic procedure for en bloc laryngo-hypopharyngeal cancer resection. Straight devices had been used for this procedure, however, some cases had difficulty to reach the lesions especially in hypopharyngeal area. To overcome this problem, technical updates to facilitate transoral manipulation were developed and long term oncological and functional results were analyzed. Methods Surgical indications were Tis, T1, T2 and selected T3 cases. In advanced T3 or T4 lesions, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was performed before surgery. Radiation failure cases (rT1 and rT2) were also indicated for TOVS. Resectable nodal involvement can be managed by combination of neck dissection. Ninety hypopharyngeal and 25 supraglottic cancer cases were retrospectively reviewed for survival analyses. In fresh hypopharyngeal cancer, 51 Stage 0–II disease and 32 Stage III-IV disease were included. In supraglottic cancer, 11 Stage I–II disease and 9 Stage III-IV disease were included. Twelve radiation failure cases were analyzed separately. As new devices, malleable forceps and malleable suction coagulator were introduced to reach the whole laryngo-hypopharynx. New curved blades for the FKWO retractor were developed and these were applied for difficult hypopharyngeal exposure cases by conventional blades. Swallowing functional outcome and risk factors for postoperative dysphagia were evaluated by univariate analysis. Results The 5-year overall survival, disease-specific survival and larynx preservation rate of fresh hypopharyngeal cancer cases were 83.2%, 94.3% and 94.6%, respectively. Those of supraglottic cancer cases were 80%, 95% and 94.7%, respectively. Those of salvage cases were 87.5%, 87.5% and 82.5%, respectively. Those of T3 and T4 hypopharyngeal cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy with TOVS were 75.0%, 82.5% and 100% respectively. Surgical complication included bleeding (2.6%) and emergency tracheostomy (3.4%). Oral intake was maintained in 94.8% cases. By univariate analysis, patient’s age (especially 80 years of age or older), larger resected area, arytenoid resection and tracheostomy were regarded as risk factors for postoperative dysphagia. Among 31 recent cases, 5 cases had difficulty in exposing hypopharyngeal lesions by conventional blades. These exposure problems were solved by curved blades. Conclusion Using malleable devices and new curved blades for the FKWO retractor, exposure problems in the hypopharynx could be solved and TOVS could be applied in more cases. Although oncological outcomes and functional outcomes were good, patients with risk factors for dysphagia should be carefully indicated.

SC58 - Long term oncologic outcomes of partial nephrectomy for cystic renal tumors: a propensity score matched-pair comparison of cystic versus clear cell carcinoma from a single center experience

SC58 - Long term oncologic outcomes of partial nephrectomy for cystic renal tumors: a propensity score matched-pair comparison of cystic versus clear cell carcinoma from a single center experience

Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Pathologic T3a Renal Masses With Venous Tumor Thrombus

ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety, efficacy, and early oncologic outcomes of pathologic T3a (pT3a) renal cell carcinoma with venous involvement treated with robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN), given that experience and outcomes in this group is limited. MethodsA retrospective chart review of patients undergoing RPN from September 2009 to July 2020 was performed. Outcomes were captured from patients with pT3a disease with vein involvement. Clinical characteristics were analyzed using SPSS (IBM, Armonk, NY). Local recurrence-free survival and metastasis-free survival at 2 years were calculated from Kaplan-Meier survival curves. ResultsFor 45 included patients, mean operative and warm ischemia times were 199.6 ± 47.3 minutes and 30.5 ± 10.5 minutes, with mean estimated blood loss of 324.9 ± 209.5 cc. Rates of transfusion, embolization, re-admission, and re-operation at 30 days were 8.9% (4/45), 2.2% (1/45), 11.1% (5/45), and 6.7% (3/45; cystoscopic stent placement), respectively. All tumors were malignant on pathology, with clear cell renal cell carcinoma being the most common (91.0%, n = 41). The positive margin rate was 6.7% (n = 3). Local recurrence occurred in 4.4% (n = 2) at a mean time of 5.2 ± 2.3 months. Four patients (8.9%) progressed to metastatic disease at a mean of 22.2 ± 23.0 months. At 2 years, local recurrence-free survival was 95.4% and metastasis-free survival was 95.3%. ConclusionWe present the largest known series of patients RPN for pT3a renal masses with venous tumor involvement. We found it both feasible and safe in the appropriate hands. Short term oncologic outcomes for these patients appear more favorable than historic literature suggested.

Complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation in colorectal cancer in the era of minimally invasive surgery.

Since the 19th century, appropriate lymphadenectomy has been considered a cornerstone of oncologic surgery and one of the most important prognostic factors. This approach can be applied to any surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. During surgery for colon and rectal cancer, an adequate portion of the mesentery is removed together with the segment of bowel affected by the disease. The adequate number of lymph nodes to be removed is standardized and reported by several guidelines. It is mandatory to determine the appropriate extent of lymphadenectomy and to balance its oncological benefits with the increased morbidity associated with its execution in cancer patients. Our review focuses on the concept of “complete mesenteric excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL),” a radical lymphadenectomy for colorectal cancer that has gained increasing interest in recent years. The aim of this study was to evaluate the evolution of this approach over the years, its potential oncologic benefits and potential risks, and the improvements offered by laparoscopic techniques. Theoretical advantages of CME are improved local-relapse rates due to complete removal of the intact mesocolic fascia and improved distance recurrence rates due to ligation of vessels at their origin (CVL) which guarantees removal of a larger number of lymph nodes. The development and worldwide diffusion of laparoscopic techniques minimized postoperative trauma in oncologic surgery, providing the same oncologic results as open surgery. This has been widely applied to colorectal cancer surgery; however, CME entails a technical complexity that can limit its wide minimally-invasive application. This review analyzes results of these procedures in terms of oncological outcomes, technical feasibility and complexity, especially within the context of minimally invasive surgery.