Tennessee Department Of Health Research Articles

Hospitals Are Closing in Tennessee: Investigating the Effect of Closures on Contraceptive Access and Short-Interval Birth [ID 2683524

INTRODUCTION: Access to maternity care (MC) and providers are important factors for contraception access and health outcomes for pregnant-capable individuals. After a series of hospital closures in Tennessee in the last decade, this study investigated the relationship between maternal county of residence and short-interval birth (SIB) rates statewide. METHODS: Tennessee birth certificate data for 2015–2020 from the Tennessee Department of Health was coded using March of Dimes 2022 definitions of access to MC overall, a hospital with obstetric (OB) care or birth center, and an OB provider (per 10k births) based on maternal county of residence. Short-interval birth was defined as birth interval 6–23 months. Nulliparous births and those with missing last living birth interval were excluded. Analysis was completed in SPSS 29.0, and Pearson χ2 tests compared SIB proportions between MC access groups. RESULTS: Overall, 269,908 births were analyzed. Of these, 78.1% maternal counties of residence had full MC access, 13.9% had low access, and 8.0% resided in a MC desert. Short-interval births were highest (24.4%; CI, 23.8–25.0) in MC deserts followed by areas with full access (23.7%; CI, 23.5–23.9) and low access (22.4%; CI, 22.0–22.8) (P<.001). Those with no access to an OB provider had highest rates of SIB (24.3%: CI, 23.7–24.8) compared to other categories (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Lacking access to maternity care likely corresponds with lacking access to contraception and higher rates of SIB in Tennessee. Prenatal and postpartum contraception counseling are important components of care for all individuals but especially those without acceptable access to OB providers and hospitals.

Geographic disparities in late HIV diagnoses in Tennessee: Opportunities for interventions in the rural Southeast.

Incident HIV remains an important public health issue in the US South, the region leading the nation in HIV incidence, rural HIV cases, and HIV-related deaths. Late diagnoses drive incident HIV and understanding factors driving late diagnoses is critical for developing locally relevant HIV testing and prevention interventions, decreasing HIV transmission, and ending the HIV epidemic. Retrospective cohort study utilizing Tennessee Department of Health (TDH) surveillance data and US Census Bureau data. Adults of ≥18-year old with a new HIV diagnosis between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019 identified in the TDH electronic HIV/AIDS Reporting System were included. Individuals were followed from initial HIV diagnosis until death, 90 days of follow-up for outcome assessment, or administrative censoring 90 days after study enrollment closed. We included 3652 newly HIV-diagnosed individuals; median age was 31 years (IQR: 25, 42), 2909 (79.7%) were male, 2057 (56.3%) were Black, 246 (6.7%) were Hispanic, 408 (11.2%) were residing in majority-rural areas at diagnosis, and 642 (17.6%) individuals received a late HIV diagnosis. Residents of majority-rural counties (adjusted risk ratios [aRR]=1.39, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.16-1.67) and Hispanic individuals (aRR=1.87, 95% CI: 1.50-2.33) had an increased likelihood of receiving a late diagnosis after controlling for race/ethnicity, age, and year of HIV diagnosis. Rural residence and Hispanic ethnicity were associated with an increased risk of receiving a late HIV diagnosis in Tennessee. Future HIV testing and prevention efforts should be adapted to the needs of these vulnerable populations.

1805. Tennessee’s Drug Diversion Investigation Team: A Collaborative Approach to a Growing Public Health Problem

Abstract Background Injection drug use using nonsterile equipment can lead to transmission of viral, bacterial, and fungal infections. Frontline healthcare workers (HCW) are at high risk for substance use disorder due to unprecedented job stress and access to injectable controlled substances. The Tennessee Department of Health (TDH) developed a collaborative investigative process to determine the risk of bloodborne pathogen (BBP) transmission from licensed HCWs engaging in drug diversion. This program recommends public health action and provides consultation to improve drug diversion programs. Methods In 2019 TDH formed a drug diversion investigation team (DDIT) consisting of pharmacists, epidemiologists and medical directors from the HAI and HIV/STI/Viral Hepatitis programs. The DDIT responds to notification by the Health-Related Boards (HRB) of a licensed HCW under investigation for diversion of injectable products. The DDIT interviews the investigator and meets the facility drug diversion program to review drug diversion policies and processes. Based on the suspected method(s) and, if known, the individual’s Hepatitis B/C and HIV status, recommendations are made regarding the need for patient notification and testing. Results From 2020–2022 the DDIT received notification of 49 licensed HCWs under investigation for diversion of injectable products. Patient notification and testing was recommended in seven facilities for CDC Category A infection control breaches; in two cases, later HCW testing negated the need for further action. Among the 34 facilities queried, only five (14.7%) had existing policies for for-cause BBP testing. Other recommendations to improve diversion programs include infection prevention participation and releasing “not eligible for rehire” status to other facilities. Conclusion The TDH DDIT facilitates communication with HRB on reported cases of injectable drug diversion. Joint investigations with facilities raise awareness of the risk of BBP transmission and improve facility diversion programs. Tennessee facilities are adding for-cause BBP testing to their investigation procedures. The TDH DDIT model receives mostly positive responses from facility and health system drug diversion teams and may be considered by other public health jurisdictions. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

The Tennessee Center for AIDS Research HIV Research Training Program for Minority High School and Undergraduate Students: Development, Implementation, and Early Outcomes.

The Southern region of the United States has the highest HIV incidence, and new infections disproportionately affect Black Americans. The Tennessee Center for AIDS Research (CFAR) Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Pathway Initiative (CDEIPI) program supports the training of individuals from groups underrepresented in medicine and science in multiple areas of research to increase the pool of HIV-focused investigators at early educational and career stages. The Tennessee CFAR is a partnership between Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Meharry Medical College (one of the oldest historically Black medical colleges), Tennessee Department of Health, and Nashville Community AIDS Resources, Education and Services (a sophisticated community service organization, which emphasizes research training responsive to regional and national priorities). The Tennessee CFAR CDEIPI program leverages existing Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Meharry Medical College structured biomedical training programs for high school and undergraduate students to provide an intensive, mentored, HIV research experience augmented by CFAR resources situating this training within the broader history, scientific breadth, and societal and political aspects of the HIV epidemic. The first year of the Tennessee CFAR CDEIPI program trained 3 high school and 3 undergraduate students from underrepresented in medicine and science backgrounds in basic, clinical/translational, and community-focused research projects with a diverse group of 9 mentors. All students completed the program, and evaluations yielded positive feedback regarding mentoring quality and effectiveness, and continued interest in HIV-related research. The Tennessee CFAR CDEIPI program will continue to build upon experience from the first year to further contribute to national efforts to increase diversity in HIV-related research.

Assessment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii–colonized patients: Which specimens produce the highest yield?

Background: Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter (CRA) bacteria are an urgent public health threat. Accurate and timely testing of CRA is important for proper infection control practices to minimize spread. In 2017, the CDC estimated 8,500 CRA cases among hospitalized patients, 700 deaths, and $281 million in attributable healthcare costs. Treatment options are extremely limited for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections, making CRAB a unique concern. Colonization screening is a valuable tool for containment but requires sampling of 4 body sites. Identifying a reliable specimen collection site for CRAB is important to inform public health recommendations as screening can cost healthcare facilities valuable time and resources. Methods: Results of all screening specimens of patients with at least 1 site positive for CRAB on a unique collection date were extracted from the Southeast Regional data of Antimicrobial Resistance Lab Network (SEARLN) data. Non-CRAB screening and screenings that did not yield at least 1 positive result on a single collection date were excluded. We also limited our data to include only the following screening sites, which have been validated by the Tennessee Department of Health’s State Public Health Laboratory: axilla and groin, rectal, sputum, and wound. For each specimen source, we calculated the percentage of positive specimen among CRAB-colonized patients. Data were extracted and analyzed using SAS version 9.4 software. Results: The SEARLN data contained 594 CRAB screening specimens collected over 4 years, 2018 through 2021, and 486 of those specimens yielded CRAB. For CRAB-colonized patients screened in this study, wound specimens had the highest positivity rate at 93.4% (95% CI, 89.9%–96.9%) of samples culturing CRAB. Sputum followed at 87.7%, then axilla and groin at 77.6% and rectal at 59.7%. Conclusions: Wound specimens produced the highest proportion of positive cultures among CRAB-positive patients, making them the sample type with the highest prevalence in our study. For healthcare facilities with limited time and resources seeking to optimize their CRAB screening process, wound specimens may be the most reliable single site for detecting CRAB colonization in patients with an open wound. When a wound is not present, sputum may be a good alternative single-source collection site. More research should be conducted before CRAB screening recommendations are updated.Disclosures: None

Comorbidities and neighborhood factors associated with prescription of sodium-glucose cotransporter protein-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists among medically underserved populations

BACKGROUND: Evidence from clinical trials shows that newer second-line diabetes medications-glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is)-have cardio-renal protective effects in addition to their glucose-lowering properties. Despite strong evidence of benefits, there is limited evidence regarding prescribing patterns for these medications, especially among populations at high risk for disparities. OBJECTIVE: To examine the associations of cardio-renal and obesity comorbidities and neighborhood factors with the prescribing of GLP-1RAs or SGLT2is in comparison with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) or sulfonylureas (SFUs) and for each of the newer second-line diabetes medications (GLP-1RA vs DPP-4i, SGLT2i vs DPP-4i, GLP-1RA vs SFU, and SGLT2i vs SFU) in medically underserved populations. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using electronic medical records from a health care delivery system that serves medically underserved populations in the Mid-South region of the United States. Metformin-treated adult patients with type 2 diabetes, and at least 1 prescription for GLP-1RA, SGLT2i, DPP-4i, or SFU class medications, were identified between April 2016 and August 2021. Neighborhood factors were assessed at the census tract level by geocoding and linking patient addresses to neighborhood-level risk factors. Using multilevel logistic regression models, we examined the associations of comorbidities and neighborhood factors with the prescription of newer second-line diabetes medications. RESULTS: 7,723 patients received newer second-line diabetes medications, with 16% prescribed GLP-1RAs, 11% prescribed SGLT2is, 28% prescribed DPP-4is, and 45% prescribed SFUs. Patients with cerebrovascular disease were significantly less likely to receive newer second-line diabetes medications (odds ratio [OR] = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.52-0.80). Patients with obesity were more likely to receive newer second-line diabetes medications (OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.48-1.90). Living in neighborhoods with higher proportions of college graduates was associated with a higher likelihood of receiving newer second-line diabetes medications (quartile 3 vs 1: OR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.06-1.59; and quartile 4 vs 1: OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.13-1.88). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate substantial underprescribing and significant clinical and neighborhood variations in the use of newer second-line diabetes medications. We found lower use of newer second-line diabetes medications among patients with cerebrovascular disease and higher use in those with obesity. Our findings also suggest that newer second-line diabetes medications are first adopted by those in higher socioeconomic groups, thus increasing disparities in care. DISCLOSURES: Dr Surbhi reports grants or contracts from the Tennessee Department of Health, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and PhRMA Foundation. Dr Bailey reports honoraria from the SouthEast Texas Chapter of the American College of Healthcare Executives, leadership or fiduciary role in the Coalition for Better Health and The Healthy City, Inc., and stock or stock options in Proctor and Gamble, Walmart, and Apple. Dr Kovesdy reports personal fees from Bayer, Abbott, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Tricida, Akebia, Cara Therapeutics, Vifor, Rockwell, CSL Behring, Boehringer Ingelheim, and GSK, outside the submitted work. The other authors report no conflicts of interest.

Containment of a Verona Integron-Encoded Metallo-Beta-Lactamase-Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa Outbreak Associated With an Acute Care Hospital Sink-Tennessee, 2018-2020.

Contaminated healthcare facility wastewater plumbing is recognized as a source of carbapenemase-producing organism transmission. In August 2019, the Tennessee Department of Health (TDH) identified a patient colonized with Verona integron-encoded metallo-beta-lactamase-producing carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (VIM-CRPA). A record review revealed that 33% (4 of 12) of all reported patients in Tennessee with VIM had history of prior admission to acute care hospital (ACH) A intensive care unit (ICU) Room X, prompting further investigation. A case was defined as polymerase chain reaction detection of blaVIM in a patient with prior admission to ACH A from November 2017 to November 2020. The TDH performed point prevalence surveys, discharge screening, onsite observations, and environmental testing at ACH A. The VIM-CRPA isolates underwent whole-genome sequencing (WGS). In a screening of 44% (n = 11) of 25 patients admitted to Room X between January and June 2020, we identified 36% (n = 4) colonized with VIM-CRPA, resulting in 8 cases associated with Room X from March 2018 to June 2020. No additional cases were identified in 2 point-prevalence surveys of the ACH A ICU. Samples from the bathroom and handwashing sink drains in Room X grew VIM-CRPA; all available case and environmental isolates were found to be ST253 harboring blaVIM-1 and to be closely related by WGS. Transmission ended after implementation of intensive water management and infection control interventions. A single ICU room's contaminated drains were associated with 8 VIM-CRPA cases over a 2-year period. This outbreak highlights the need to include wastewater plumbing in hospital water management plans to mitigate the risk of transmission of antibiotic-resistant organisms to patients.

Phylogeny and Genomic Characterization of Clinical Salmonella enterica Serovar Newport Collected in Tennessee.

Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Newport (S. Newport) is a clinically and epidemiologically significant serovar in the United States. It is the second most prevalent clinically isolated Salmonella serovar in the United States, and it can contaminate a wide variety of food products. In this study, we evaluated the population structure of S. Newport clinical isolates obtained by the Tennessee Department of Health during routine surveillance (n = 346), along with a diverse set of other global clinical isolates obtained from EnteroBase (n = 271). Most of these clinical isolates belonged to established lineages II and III. Additionally, we performed lineage-specific phylogenetic analyses and were able to identify 18 potential epidemiological clusters among the isolates from Tennessee, which represented a greater proportion of Tennessee isolates belonging to putative epidemiological clusters than the proportion of isolates of this serovar that are outbreak related. IMPORTANCE This study provides insight on the genomic diversity of one of the Salmonella serovars that most frequently cause human illness. Specifically, we explored the diversity of human clinical isolates from a localized region (Tennessee) and compared this level of diversity with the global context. Additionally, we showed that a greater proportion of isolates were associated with potential epidemiological clusters (based on genomic relatedness) than historical estimates. We also identified that one potential cluster was predicted to be multidrug resistant. Taken together, these findings provide insight on Salmonella enterica serovar Newport that can impact public health surveillance and responses and serve as a foundational context for the Salmonella research community.

1780. Analysis of Appropriate Outpatient Prescriptions based on Diagnosis Codes, Tennessee, 2020

Abstract Background In the US, approximately 60% of antimicrobial prescriptions (Rx) are written in the outpatient setting, and roughly 30% of those are unnecessary. The Tennessee Department of Health (TDH) previously described outpatient antimicrobial use in 2016 and 2018. TDH acquired additional data from the IQVIA Longitudinal Prescription and Medical Claims datasets. We sought to link antimicrobial Rx to diagnosis claims from preceding outpatient office visits to measure appropriateness of statewide antimicrobial Rx. Methods IQVIA medical claims data and antimicrobial Rx data for calendar year 2020 were used in this study. A unique patient ID was used to track antimicrobial Rx over time. Prescriptions filled within 7 days after a patient’s medical visit were included. Diagnoses codes from the medical visits were categorized as Tier 1 (diagnoses that always require antimicrobial therapy) and Tier 3 (diagnoses that never require antimicrobial therapy). Tier 2 diagnoses were excluded. We compared Tier 1 prescriptions versus Tier 3 Rx volume. Results We identified 2.3 million Rx linked to a preceding outpatient office visit within 7 days; 70.5% were filled within 3 days of the corresponding office visit, 14.1% within 4–5 days, and 15.4% within 6–7 days. Of all included Rx, 16.4% were prescribed following a pure Tier 1 diagnosis, and 83.6% were prescribed following a pure Tier 3 diagnosis. Diagnoses for respiratory conditions accounted for 38.4% of the pure Tier 3 visits, urinary tract conditions for 17.7%, gastrointestinal conditions for 16.2%, and skin and soft tissue conditions for 15.8%. For the respiratory conditions, viral upper respiratory infection accounted for the highest percent of antimicrobials prescribed (27.1%), followed by asthma/allergy indications (17%), and bronchitis (8.9%). Conclusion A significant number of antimicrobials prescribed in Tennessee in 2020 were able to be linked to office visit diagnosis codes. Most Rx were prescribed for indications that do not require antimicrobial therapy. Respiratory conditions accounted for the highest percentage of visits resulting in antimicrobial therapy that did not require treatment. Continued educational efforts and provider feedback of these data are planned to combat unnecessary overprescribing in Tennessee. Disclosures Milner B. Staub, MD, MPH, Gilead: Stocks/Bonds|Johnson & Johnson: Stocks/Bonds.

Characteristics of patients positive for COVID-19 and multidrug-resistant organisms in Tennessee, 2020–2021

Background: Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are a global threat. To track and contain the spread, the Tennessee Department of Health (TDH) performs targeted surveillance of carbapenemase-producing and pan-nonsusceptible organisms. When these MDROs are identified, TDH conducts a containment response and collects epidemiological data, which includes risk factors such as indwelling devices and previous hospitalizations. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on these MDROs is not well understood. Therefore, we have described the characteristics of cases positive for both COVID-19 and select MDROs. Methods: MDRO investigation data from January 1, 2020–September 30, 2021 were matched with all COVID-19 case data from the TDH statewide surveillance system, National Electronic Disease Surveillance System Base System. MDRO-positive date was defined as the specimen collection date; COVID-19 case date was first defined as the date of symptom onset and if missing, then diagnosis date, and investigation creation date, respectively. Descriptive statistics and Fisher exact tests were calculated using SAS version 9.4 software. Results: Among 336 MDRO cases, 50 had a reported SARS-CoV-2–positive result. MDRO types were Enterobacterales (CRE) (n = 31), Acinetobacter spp (CRA) (n = 18), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1). Of these 50 cases, 20 were MDRO-positive before and 30 days after the COVID-19 case date, respectively. Of the 18 CRA cases, 16 (89%), were positive after the COVID-19 case date, compared to 13 (42%) among 31 CRE cases (P < .01). Also, 35 patients (70%) had a record of hospitalization, and 22 (63%) had their MDRO specimen collected after the COVID-19 case date (P = .37). Of these 22 patients, 4 had their MDRO specimen collected during their COVID-19 hospitalization, with an average duration from admission to MDRO collection date of 17 days (range, 4–36). Among the 50 coinfected cases, 8 died, 7 (88%) of whom were MDRO-positive after their COVID-19 case date. Data on indwelling devices at time of MDRO positivity were completed for 17 cases; 14 had an indwelling device and, among these, 13 (93%) were MDRO-positive after their COVID-19 case date. Conclusions: MDRO cases with specimen collections after COVID-19 comprised the majority of hospitalized patients, patients who died, and patients with indwelling devices compared to those with MDROs collected before their COVID-19 case date. These results show a stark difference with CRA as the most common MDRO among post–COVID-19 cases. Our data were limited by reporting gaps. We recognize that patients can remain colonized with MDROs for lengthy durations, which could have result in undetected MDRO cases prior to the COVID-19 case date. More data and analyses are needed to make targeted public health recommendations. However, these findings highlight the burden of MDROs among COVID-19 cases. including adverse health outcomes.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on Tennessee hospital antibiotic use

Background: On March 5, 2020, the Tennessee Department of Health (TDH) announced the first case of COVID-19 in the state. Since then, hospitals have been overwhelmed by the spike in respiratory infections. Several studies have attempted to describe the impact of the pandemic on antibiotic prescriptions. The NHSN Antimicrobial Use Option offers a platform for hospitals to report their antibiotic usage. The TDH has established access to hospital antibiotic usage data statewide through an existing NHSN user group. We compared the change in the volume of inpatient antibiotic prescriptions before and during the pandemic. Methods: An ecological study was conducted from January 2019 to December 2021. Aggregated facility-level data from the NHSN Antimicrobial Use Option were used to describe antibacterial use among Tennessee hospitals. Data from facilities that had reported at least 1 month of data during the study period were included in this study. The antimicrobial use rate was calculated by dividing the antimicrobial days of therapy (DOT) by the number of 1,000 days present. Overall antimicrobial use rates as well as specific antimicrobial use rates for azithromycin, ceftriaxone, and piperacillin–tazobactam were compared across years. Results: In total, 55 hospitals reported at least 1 month of data into the NHSN Antimicrobial Use Option during the study period. These hospitals had a median bed size of 140 (range, 12–689). Conclusions: We observed a modest increase in overall antibiotic use during the COVID-19 pandemic in Tennessee facilities. This trend appeared to be primarily attributed to agents used for community-acquired respiratory infections, such as azithromycin and ceftriaxone, earlier in the pandemic. However, both of these agents have fallen to prepandemic use levels during 2021. The fact that overall use increased in 2021 suggests that other agents not analyzed may have contributed to this effect. Further analysis may help determine which agents are responsible for this increase in 2021.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Determining the effect of COVID-19 on antibiotic use in long-term care facilities across Tennessee

Background: Nationally, a decrease in total antibiotic use in nursing homes during the COVID-19 pandemic was observed with an increase in select agents used for respiratory infections. Currently there is minimal data on antibiotic use in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) in Tennessee. To address this issue, the Tennessee Department of Health (TDH) developed a monthly point-prevalence survey of antibiotic use. Utilizing this tool, we sought to determine the effect the pandemic had on antibiotic use in Tennessee LTCFs. Method: We developed a REDCap questionnaire to collect information on selected antibiotics administered in Tennessee LTCFs. Antibiotic use percentage was determined by dividing the number of residents who received an antibiotic on the day of survey by facilities’ average censuses. Data were divided into a prepandemic period (January 2019–February 2020) and a period during the pandemic (March 2020–December 2021). Antibiotic prescriptions were grouped into 4 classes according to their most common uses: Clostridium difficile infections, urinary tract infections, skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs), and respiratory infections. Average percentage of residents on antibiotics were compared between study periods. Results: In total, 37 facilities participated in the survey during the prepandemic period and 32 facilities participated during the pandemic period; 14 participated during both periods. The average percentage of residents on antimicrobials before the pandemic was 16.3%, which decreased to 11.5% during the pandemic period (P = .04). During the prepandemic period, 40.2% of antibiotics prescribed were in the common for SSTI category and 38.3% were in the common for respiratory infections category (P = .01); during the pandemic period, 64.3% of antibiotics prescribed were in the common for SSTI category and 45.8% were in the common for respiratory infections category (P = .01). The 3 most prescribed antibiotics in the prepandemic period were amoxicillin (148 prescriptions), doxycycline (140 prescriptions), and levofloxacin (135 prescriptions). The 3 most prescribed antibiotics during the pandemic were doxycycline (141 prescriptions), levofloxacin (125 prescriptions), and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (115 prescriptions). Conclusions: Survey results revealed that antibiotic prescriptions commonly used for respiratory infections increased 7.5% during the pandemic study period. Additionally, the average percentage of residents on antimicrobials fell 4.8% during this period. Both statistics reflect what has been seen nationally with a decrease in antibiotic use with an increase in respiratory antibiotics. This could be due to multiple factors including decreased reporting, a change in healthcare delivery during the pandemic, and facilities seeing an increase of respiratory tract infections. These data will be used to guide future TDH antibiotic stewardship efforts in the long-term care setting.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Translocation of an Anteater (Tamandua tetradactyla) Infected with Rabies from Virginia to Tennessee Resulting in Multiple Human Exposures, 2021.

On August 16, 2021, the Tennessee Department of Health (TDH) was notified of a positive rabies test result from a South American collared anteater (Tamandua tetradactyla) in Washington County, Tennessee. Tamanduas, or lesser anteaters, are a species of anteater in which rabies has not previously been reported. The animal was living at a Tennessee zoo and had been recently translocated from a zoo in Virginia. TDH conducted an investigation to confirm the rabies result, characterize the rabies variant, and ascertain an exposure risk assessment among persons who came into contact with the tamandua. Risk assessments for 22 persons were completed to determine the need for rabies postexposure prophylaxis (rPEP); rPEP was recommended for 13 persons, all of whom agreed to receive it. Using phylogenetic results of the virus isolated from the tamandua and knowledge of rabies epidemiology, public health officials determined that the animal was likely exposed to wild raccoons present at the Virginia zoo. This report describes expansion of the wide mammalian species diversity susceptible to rabies virus infection and summarizes the investigation, highlighting coordination among veterinary and human public health partners and the importance of preexposure rabies vaccination for animal handlers and exotic zoo animals.

‘PrEP’ing Memphis: A qualitative process evaluation of peer navigation support

BackgroundHIV PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis) navigation comprises intervention strategies used to improve PrEP uptake via education, linkage, and follow-up/ongoing engagement. During 2016–2019, the Tennessee Department of Health (TDH) implemented a CDC-funded demonstration project (“Project PrIDE”) focused on PrEP navigation in Memphis community-based organizations (CBOs) and the Shelby County Health Department (HD). A process evaluation was conducted to determine facilitators and barriers to the implementation of the Memphis-based Project PrIDE PrEP navigation activities. MethodsA total of fourteen in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted, with nine PrEP navigators in evaluation year 1 (2018) and five of the original navigators in evaluation year 2 (2019), to understand the navigation processes using thematic analysis. ResultsFacilitators of PrEP navigation included accessing clients at testing events, accompanying clients to first appointments, rapport building with patient and clinic staff, and maintaining consistent engagement with clients. Factors impeding PrEP navigation included difficulties assessing client readiness, tracking client navigation status, and stigmatizing clinic and social experiences for clients. Conclusions and lessons learnedFindings have informed the scale-up of PrEP navigation implementation statewide, along with priority setting and resource allocation for the local Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) initiative in Memphis.

The Influence of COVID-19 Vaccination on Daily Cases, Hospitalization, and Death Rate in Tennessee, United States: Case Study.

BackgroundThe COVID-19 outbreak highlights our vulnerability to novel infections, and vaccination remains a foreseeable method to return to normal life. However, infrastructure is inadequate for the immediate vaccination of the whole population. Therefore, policies have adopted a strategy to vaccinate older adults and vulnerable populations while delaying vaccination for others.ObjectiveThis study aimed to understand how age-specific vaccination strategies reduce daily cases, hospitalizations, and death rates using official statistics for Tennessee, United States.MethodsThis study used publicly available data on COVID-19, including vaccination rates, positive cases, hospitalizations, and deaths from the Tennessee Department of Health. Data from the first date of vaccination (December 17, 2020) to March 3, 2021, were retrieved. The rates were adjusted by 2019 data from the US Census Bureau, and age groups were stratified into 10-year intervals starting with 21 years of age.ResultsThe findings showed that vaccination strategy can reduce the numbers of patients with COVID-19 in all age groups, with lower hospitalization and death rates in older populations. Older adults had a 95% lower death rate from December to March; no change in the death rate of other age groups was observed. The hospitalization rate was reduced by 80% for people aged ≥80 years, while people who were 50 to 70 years old had nearly the same hospitalization rate as prior to vaccination.ConclusionsThis research indicates that targeting older age groups for vaccination is the optimal way to avoid higher transmissions and reduce hospitalization and death rates.

Verona Integron-Encoded Metallo-Beta-Lactamase (VIM)–Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa Outbreak Associated with Acute Care

Background: Contaminated healthcare facility plumbing is increasingly recognized as a source of carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs). In August 2019, the Tennessee State Public Health Laboratory identified Tennessee’s twelfth VIM-producing carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (VIM-CRPA), from a patient in a long-term acute-care hospital. To determine a potential reservoir, the Tennessee Department of Health (TDH) reviewed healthcare exposures for all cases. Four cases (33%), including the most recent case and earliest from March 2018, had a history of admission to intensive care unit (ICU) room X at acute-care hospital A (ACH A), but the specimens were collected at other facilities. The Public Health Laboratory collaborated with ACH A to assess exposures, perform environmental sampling, and implement control measures. Methods: TDH conducted in-person infection prevention assessments with ACH A, including a review of the water management program. Initial recommendations included placing all patients admitted to room X on contact precautions, screening for CPO on room discharge, daily sink basin and counter cleaning, and other sink hygiene measures. TDH collected environmental and water samples from 5 ICU sinks (ie, the handwashing and bathroom sinks in room X and neighboring room Y [control] and 1 hallway sink) and assessed the presence of VIM-CRPA. Moreover, 5 patients and 4 environmental VIM-CRPA underwent whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Results: From February to June 2020, of 21 patients admitted to room X, 9 (43%) underwent discharge screening and 4 (44%) were colonized with VIM-CRPA. Average room X length of stay was longer for colonized patients (11.3 vs 4.8 days). Drain swabs from room X’s bathroom and handwashing sinks grew VIM-CRPA; VIM-CRPA was not detected in tap water or other swab samples. VIM-CRPA from the environment and patients were sequence type 253 and varied by 0–13 single-nucleotide variants. ACH A replaced room X’s sinks and external plumbing in July. Discharge screening and contact precautions for all patients were discontinued in November, 5 months following the last case and 12 consecutive negative patient discharge screens. Improved sink hygiene and mechanism testing for CRPA from clinical cultures continued, with no new cases identified. Conclusions: An ICU room with a persistently contaminated sink drain was a persistent reservoir of VIM-CRPA. The room X attack rate was high, with VIM-CRPA acquisition occurring in >40% of patients screened. The use of contaminated plumbing fixtures in ACH have the potential to facilitate transmission to patients but may be challenging to identify and remediate. All healthcare facilities should follow sink hygiene best practices.Funding: NoDisclosures: None

222. Comparison of Outpatient Antibiotic Prescriptions in a High Prescribing State, 2016–2018

BackgroundAbout 80% of antibiotic prescriptions are written in outpatient settings. Outpatient antibiotic use (AU) is highest in the Southern United States. Tennessee consistently has one of the highest AU rates in the country. Previous analyses found that 1,195 prescriptions were filled in Tennessee per 1,000 total population in 2016. Moreover, 50% of all outpatient antibiotic prescriptions were written by 9.3% of prescribers. We sought to assess Tennessee outpatient antibiotic prescribing trends, comparing 2016 with 2018 data.MethodsThe Tennessee IQVIA outpatient antibiotic prescription dataset from January 1 to December 31, 2018 was analyzed and compared to 2016 results. Orally administered antibacterial agents were included. Patients < 20 years old were classified as pediatric. County level population data were obtained from the Tennessee Department of Health. Antibiotic prescription rates were calculated as antibiotics prescribed per 1,000 population in the specified age group. Analysis was performed using SAS 9.4.ResultsThe statewide AU rate decreased from 1,195 in 2016 to 1,074 in 2018 per 1,000 population. Consistent with the previous analysis, female patients (1,288), those over 65 years (1,459), and those < 2 years (1,372) had the highest rates of AU in 2018. Lower rates were observed in all age groups in 2018 except for the 3–9 years group. While narrow penicillins and macrolides remain the most frequently prescribed antibiotics, amoxicillin-clavulanate and ciprofloxacin fell out of the top five antibiotics used in adults, and amoxicillin-clavulanate fell out of the top five antibiotics used in pediatrics. Similar to 2016, 9.2% (3,098) of the providers contributed to 50% of the total prescriptions in 2016, and 2,090 of the 2,994 (69.8%) 2016 highest prescribing providers were also among the highest prescribers in 2018.ConclusionDespite a decline in outpatient antibiotic prescription volume, Tennessee remains one of the nation’s highest prescribing states. While a decline in broad spectrum antibiotic prescriptions may indicate a shift to more appropriate usage, these data do not include indication, excluding appropriate use assessment. Identifying and focusing antibiotic stewardship interventions for consistently high prescribers remains a priority for Tennessee.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Comparing Automated Cluster Detection Methods for Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE): Rule-Based Versus Statistical

Background: The Tennessee (TN) Department of Health (TDH) has been identifying clusters of reportable conditions using the Electronic Surveillance System for Early Notification of Community-Based Epidemics (ESSENCE), a cluster detection method using space-time scan permutation statistics based on patient ZIP code. CRE are reportable in Tennessee; isolate submission is required for carbapenemase (CP) production and resistance mechanism (eg, KPC gene) testing. The Council for Outbreak Response: Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI) and Antimicrobial-Resistant (AR) Pathogens (CORHA) released proposed thresholds of reporting CRE to public health. Thresholds vary by healthcare facility type and regional epidemiology. The TDH HAI/AR program currently runs a daily automated SAS code using the CORHA reporting threshold to help public health identify suspect KPC clusters. We evaluated our rule-based CORHA method against 2 space-time statistic-based methods for KPC cluster detection in Tennessee. Methods: Simulations for each cluster detection method were performed using retrospective CP-CRE surveillance data for 2018. Simulations were conducted using (1) CORHA reporting thresholds by facility case count to flag clusters of 2 or more cases within 28 days, (2) ESSENCE using patient residence ZIP code and the earliest of collection date or symptom onset date as is used for other reportable conditions in Tennessee, and (3) a modified space-time statistical method using SaTScan in which reporting facility, rather than a geographic location, was used as space variable to detect within-facility clusters within 1–28 days. We compared the number and overlap of cases and clusters identified with each method. Univariate logistic regression with CORHA flagging as predictor and flagging by each ESSENCE or CORHA method as outcome variables, were used to compare cases tagged by each method pair, respectively. Results: Of 183 KPC CP-CRE cases, 54 (30.6%) were flagged as part of suspect clusters by at least 1 method. Simulations generated 16 alerts (36 cases) using CORHA, 10 clusters (25 cases) using modified SaTScan, and 10 clusters (20 cases) using standard ESSENCE protocol. Among KPC CP-CRE cases flagged by CORHA, 12 (33.3%) were also flagged by modified SaTScan and 2 (5%) by ESSENCE. A case flagged using CORHA method has 5.15 (95% CI, 2.10–12.64) times higher odds of also being flagged by the modified SaTScan method compared to cases not flagged by CORHA. Conclusions: An algorithm based on CORHA thresholds for reporting CRE to public health had strong agreement with modified SaTScan, a space-time method. We intend to explore the extension of the time interval for ESSENCE.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Determining Antibiotic Use in Long-Term Care Facilities Across Tennessee

Background: Antibiotic stewardship is an area of great concern in long-term care facilities nationwide. The CDC promotes 7 core elements of antimicrobial stewardship. Based on information obtained from the Infection Control Assessment and Response (ICAR) Program, the 2 core elements most infrequently achieved by LTCFs are tracking and reporting. Currently, minimal data are available on antibiotic use (AU) in LTCFs in Tennessee. To address both issues, the Tennessee Department of Health (TDH) developed a monthly antibiotic use (AU) point-prevalence (PP) survey to provide LTCFs with a free tool to both track and report their AU and to gather data on how LTCFs are using antibiotics. Methods: We used REDCap to create a questionnaire to collect information on selected antibiotics administered in Tennessee LTCFs. This self-administered survey was promoted through the TDH monthly antimicrobial stewardship and infection control (ASIC) call as well as at various conferences and speaking engagements across the state. Antimicrobial stewardship leads for each facility were targeted. Antibiotics were grouped into 4 classes according to their indications: C. difficile infections, urinary tract infections, skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) and respiratory infections. We determined AU percentage by dividing the number of days of therapy for a drug by a facility’s average census. Individualized reports are provided to each participating facility on a quarterly basis. Results: Currently, 16 facilities have participated in the survey. Overall, 40.7% of antibiotics prescribed were in the common for SSTI category and 39.3% were common for respiratory infections. The top 33 most commonly prescribed antibiotics were amoxicillin (156 days of therapy [DOT]), nitrofurantoin (92 DOT), and levofloxacin (88 DOT). The average percentage of residents on antimicrobials on the day of survey was 12.3%; within this group, 57% of antibiotics were initiated in the LTCF, whereas 43% were present upon admission. Conclusions: Early results from the TDH AU PP survey revealed that drugs commonly used for SSTIs and respiratory infection were the most common antibiotic prescriptions and a potential area of focus for TDH’s antimicrobial stewardship efforts. None of the 3 most frequently prescribed antibiotics, however, fall under the SSTI indication, despite SSTI being the most commonly prescribed indication based on the survey’s evaluation metrics. This finding could be related to the larger number of antibiotics that fall under the SSTI indication. Preliminary data are being used to guide the direction of TDH’s future ASIC calls to better suit disease states, which have room for improvement.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Determining Core Element Achievement in Long-Term Care Facilities Across Tennessee

Background: In 2017, a new antimicrobial stewardship standard was established by the Joint Commission that requires long-term care facilities (LTCFs) to have an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) based on current scientific literature. The Tennessee Department of Health (TDH) team sought to ascertain the current state of ASPs across Tennessee and to assist programs with implementation strategies. Utilizing a Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services’ Civil Monetary Penalties grant, the TDH purchased copies of the National Quality Partners Playbook for Antibiotic Stewardship in Post-Acute and Long-Term Care to provide to LTCFs as incentive to complete a survey that would evaluate their current adoption of core elements. Methods: A self-administered questionnaire on ASP practices was developed and distributed to LCTFs. This survey expanded upon questions from the NHSN 2018 LTCF annual survey. These questions pertained to actionable items facilities are taking to achieve core elements. Achievement of the CDC’s 7 core elements of ASPs was determined based upon a combination of 1 or more responses to the survey questions. The percentage of LTCFs achieving each ASP core element at the regional and statewide level was determined. We also calculated the percentage of LTCFs that achieved all 7 elements versus 5 or more core elements. The analyses and visualizations were performed using SAS 9.4 and Tableau software. Results: Currently, 88 of 316 licensed LTCF facilities in Tennessee have participated in the survey. All regions were represented by EMS region. Based on the results of our survey, 100% of participating facilities have achieved at least 5 core elements, and 78% of participating facilities have achieved all 7 core elements. The core element with the lowest achievement was Accountability at 89%, and reporting and action had the highest achievement (100%). Conclusions: Early results suggest that LTCFs across Tennessee have active ASPs with strong core element achievement. However, we received responses from only 27% of licensed LTCFs. Minimal data are available regarding the current state of LTCF ASPs in Tennessee, and data will continue to be collected and analyzed. Participation may be limited to those already actively engaged in public health efforts, including antimicrobial stewardship. LTCFs that have participated in the initial evaluation will be surveyed at 6 months and 12 months after receipt of playbooks to evaluate their ASP progression and NQP Playbook utilization.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None