Tendon Transfer Group Research Articles

Surgical Reconstruction of Elbow Extension in Spinal Cord Injury and Tetraplegia: A Systematic Review

Surgical reconstruction of elbow extension can help restore function in patients with tetraplegia and triceps paralysis because of spinal cord injury. Both posterior deltoid-to-triceps tendon transfer and transfer of the branch of the axillary nerve to the triceps motor branch of the radial nerve have been described for triceps reanimation. This systematic review aimed at reviewing current evidence in the two schools of surgery in terms of their outcome and complication profile. A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE (1974-2023) and EMBASE (1946-2023) databases. The keyword terms "elbow extension," "triceps," "deltoid," "nerve transfer," "spinal cord injury," "tetraplegia," "quadriplegia," and "tetraplegic" were used in the initial search, which was supplemented with manual searches of the bibliographies of retrieved articles. Twenty studies met our inclusion criteria, with 14 studies (229 limbs) on posterior deltoid-to-triceps tendon transfer, 5 studies (23 limbs) on axillary to radial nerve transfer, and 1 study (1 limb) on combined transfer. For the tendon transfer group, the majority of studies reported a median triceps power of grade 3, with a wide range of failure percentage to reach antigravity (0% to 87.5%). Common complications included gradual stretching of the musculotendinous unit, rupture of the tendon transferred, elbow contracture, and infection. For the nerve transfer group, the majority of studies also reported a median triceps power reaching grade 3. There were no reported complications or loss of power in donor action of shoulder abduction or external rotation. Transfer of the axillary nerve branch to the triceps motor branch of the radial nerve in tetraplegia shows promising results, with comparable triceps muscle power compared to traditional tendon transfer and a low incidence of complication. Systematic Review III.

Comparison of the Results of Delayed Repair of Flexor Pollicis Longus (FPL) Tendon with Tendon Transfer or with Tendon Graft.

In Flexor Pollicis Longus (FPL) injuries, primary repair with end-to-end suture is the treatment of choice. In cases where primary repair is not possible, tendon transfer or tendon grafting is used, each of which has its strengths and weaknesses. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of each of the above two methods in patients. Patients with FPL injury who referred to Hazrat Fatemeh Hospital, Tehran, Iran late in 2020 to 2021, if primary tendon repair was not possible, were randomly repaired with tendon transfer or tendon graft. After the appropriate time, the splint was opened and physiotherapy was performed for the patients. Then, at least three months after the repair, the range of motion of the IP and MP joints of the patients thumb was measured and compared in two groups. Ten patients in the tendon transfer group and 10 patients in the tendon graft group were studied. In the secondary repair of FPL with tendon grafting, the range of motion of both IP and MP joints of the thumb was not significantly different compared to repair with tendon transfer. The findings of this research confirm controversies in this field. In order to obtain more accurate results, it is suggested to carry out a research with a larger number of patients and with strict control over the surgical technique and post-operative care, as well as taking into account the morbidities caused by donor tendon removal and examining the overall satisfaction of the patients.

Pronator teres nerve branch transfer to the extensor carpi radialis brevis nerve branch for wrist extension reconstruction in proximal radial nerve injury following humeral shaft fractures

BackgroundTendon and nerve transfers are used for functional reconstruction in cases of proximal radial nerve injury complicated by humeral fractures in patients who do not show functional recovery after primary nerve repair. The effectiveness of pronator teres (PT) nerve branch transfer to the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ERCB) nerve branch for wrist extension reconstruction was investigated and compared to the results of tendon transfer.MethodsThis study included 10 patients with proximal radial nerve injury, who did not show functional recovery after primary nerve repair at our hospital between April 2016 and May 2019. The nerve transfer procedure included PT nerve branch transfer to the ECRB nerve branch to restore wrist extension and the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) nerve branch to the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) to restore thumb and finger extension. Tendon transfer procedures included PT transfer to the ECRB for wrist extension, FCR transfer to the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) for finger extension and palmaris longus (PL) transfer to the extensor pollicis longus (EPL) for thumb extension.ResultsFive patients recovered Medical Research Council grade M4 muscle strength in the ECRB and EPL in both tendon and nerve groups. Two patients recovered grade M3 strength and three patients recovered grade M4 strength in the EDC in the tendon transfer group, and all five patients recovered grade M4 strength in the EDC in the nerve transfer group. Limited wrist flexion was observed only in one patient in the tendon transfer group.ConclusionPT nerve branch transfer to the ECRB nerve branch combined with FCR nerve branch transfer to PIN is a useful strategy for wrist and fingers extension reconstruction in patients with proximal radial nerve injuries.

Comparison of bridge graft and end-to-side transfer for treatment of closed rupture of the flexor tendons in the little finger.

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of bridge tendon grafts and end-to-side tendon transfers for treating closed ruptures of the flexor tendons in Zones 3 to 5 of the little finger. We selected the surgical procedure based on the passive distraction amplitude of the proximal part of the ruptured flexor tendon. Eleven patients comprised the bridge tendon graft group and ten patients comprised the end-to-side tendon transfer group. We found no significant between-group differences in the total active motion, percentage of total active motion, functional assessment by the Strickland and Glogovac criteria and grip strength compared with the unaffected hand. We believe that choosing the surgical procedure after determining the passive distraction amplitude of the ruptured tendon can be useful in clinical practice.Level of evidence: III.

A kinematic and electromyographic comparison of a Grammont-style reverse arthroplasty combined with a l'Episcopo transfer compared to a lateralized humeral component reverse for restoration of active external rotation.

To assess kinematic and electromyographic findings of two designs of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). We tested two hypotheses: (H1) Grammont-style (RTSA) with l'Episcopo tendon transfer gains similar postoperative kinematic findings of a lateralized humeral component RTSA without a tendon transfer; (H2) RTSA with lateralized humeral component induces earlier shoulder muscle activation during shoulder motion compared with standard Grammont prosthesis with l'Episcopo transfer. Twenty-five patients with a cuff tear arthropathy, pseudoparalysis, and a positive dropping sign were sequentially included. A Grammont-style RTSA with a l'Episcopo tendon transfer was implanted in 13 patients (medialized humerus and transfer group) and an on-lay curved-stem RTSA in 12 (lateralized humerus group). Constant score; the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score; and active shoulder range of motion (flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation) were measured pre- and postoperatively. Upper limb kinematic and surface electromyography (EMG) (anterior and posterior deltoid; upper, middle, and lower trapezius; and the upper and lower latissimus dorsi muscles) were recorded during active range of motion. At > 24months of follow-up, the Constant and DASH scores and active shoulder range of motion improved in both groups (p < 0.0001). Internal rotation was significantly higher in the lateralized humerus group than in the medialized humerus and transfer group (p = 0.004). The dropping sign was found in 0/12 patients in the lateralized humerus group and in 5/13 patients in the medialized humerus and transfer group (p < 0.001). Kinematic findings were similar between groups (p = 0.286). A pattern of earlier muscle activation in the lateralized humerus group was found as compared to the transfer group as follows: (i) posterior deltoid during external rotation (p = 0.004); (ii) upper latissimus dorsi and middle and lower trapezius during flexion (p = 0.004, p = 0.005, and p = 0.042, respectively); (iii) lower latissimus dorsi during abduction (p = 0.016). RTSA with a lateralized humeral component provided similar active external rotation restoration to a Grammont-style RTSA with a l'Episcopo procedure in patients with a dropping sign. The posterior deltoid muscle underwent earlier activation during active external rotation in the lateralized humerus RTSA group as compared to the tendon transfer group. Our findings demonstrated the H1 and only partially demonstrated the H2 of the study.

Early rehabilitation of victims of traumatic ulnar injury using tendon transfer

BackgroundPoor awareness among the patients and lack of resources for proper management of nerve injuries leads to delayed presentation of most traumatic ulnar nerve injuries. When this injury is present in the proximal forearm it leads to poor outcomes as Ulnar nerve repair with grafts takes a prolonged time to restore function. Addition of a tendon transfer to this procedure can allow patients to return to work earlier. The purpose of this study is to examine whether the addition of a tendon transfer to nerve repair surgery will lead to improved hand function and rehabilitation earlier than nerve grafting alone in cases of delayed presentation of Ulnar nerve injuries. MethodsA retrospective analysis of patients with traumatic ulnar nerve injury with duration of injury more than 1 month and location > 5 cm proximal to the flexor retinaculum who required a sural nerve graft for repair was done using Sollerman Hand Function test (SHFT). The SHFT scores were recorded for these patients at end of one year following repair with nerve grafting and status of employment at end of 6 and 12 month of surgery recorded as well. Another group of patients with traumatic ulnar injury of the same profile were given Fritchi tendon transfer along with sural nerve graft and followed up prospectively for a period of one year and SHFT score with status of employment recorded. ResultsOn comparison of employment status at 6 months we found that among the tendon transfer group 15/20 (75%) were employed while only 4/16 (20%) in the control group were able to return to work. Chi square test shows a p value of 0.002 (significant at p < 0.05). On evaluation at end of 1 year after surgery we found 18/20 (90%) had returned to work in the tendon transfer group while 8/16 (50%) had found employment again in the control group. Chi square test shows a p value 0.007 (significant at p < 0.05) ConclusionThese outcomes suggest that addition of a tendon transfer with nerve grafting promotes early rehabilitation, especially in patients employed in manual labor.

Nerve Versus Tendon Transfer for Radial Nerve Paralysis Reconstruction

With radial nerve lesions, the results of nerve transfers and how they objectively compare with the outcomes of tendon transfers remain unstudied. We compared the results after nerve transfer in patients with less than 12 months since radial nerve injury with the results after tendon transfer in patients not eligible for nerve surgery because of longstanding paralysis (minimum of 15 months). In 14 patients with radial nerve lesions incurred less than 12 months previously, we transferred the anterior interosseous nerve to the nerve of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB), while the nerve to the flexor carpi radialis was transferred to the posterior interosseous nerve. In 13 patients with lesions of longer duration, we transferred the pronator teres tendon to the ECRB, the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon to the extensor digitorum communis, and the palmaris longus to the rerouted extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tendon. At a final evaluation, we measured passive and active range of motion (ROM) of the wrist, finger, and thumb and grasp strength. In a comparison of wrist flexion-extension ROM and grasp strength, we observed better recovery in the nerve transfer than in the tendon transfer group. In the tendon transfer group, we observed limitations in wrist flexion in 9 of the 13 patients and permanent radial deviation in 5. Half of the patients in the tendon transfer group needed to flex their wrist to fully extend their fingers, whereas finger extension was possible with the wrist either extended or at neutral in all patients following nerve transfer. After nerve transfer, extension at the first carpometacarpal joint was restored in 11 of the 14 patients, whereas this occurred in just 4 of the 13 patients following tendon transfer. In both groups, we observed a 30° lag in thumb metacarpophalangeal extension, which reflects poor recovery of EPL function. Overall, we observed better outcomes in those who underwent nerve transfer versus tendon transfer procedures. However, room still remains for improved thumb motion with both procedures. Therapeutic IV.

Wide-Awake Flexor Pollicis Longus Tendon Reconstruction with Evaluation of the Active Voluntary Contraction of the Ruptured Muscle-Tendon.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical outcome of the wide-awake tendon reconstruction for chronic rupture of the flexor pollicis longus tendon with evaluation of the voluntary active contraction distance of the ruptured musculotendinous unit. Eleven consecutive patients underwent tendon reconstruction under wide-awake surgery. If the total of the passive distraction distance and the active contraction distance of the ruptured flexor pollicis longus musculotendinous unit was greater than 30 mm, tendon grafting was performed. If not, tendon transfer was performed using the fourth flexor digitorum superficialis. Patients were evaluated with total active motion before surgery, during surgery, and in final follow-up and subjectively surveyed with quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores. The final outcomes of tendon grafting and of tendon transfer were compared. Tendon grafting was performed in four patients, and tendon transfer was performed in seven patients. The final follow-up total active motion was 84.3 ± 12.7 percent in the tendon transfer group and 80.7 ± 10.2 percent in the tendon grafting group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the final follow-up total active motion percentage and quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores. The functional outcomes of both tendon grafting and tendon transfer were acceptable based on evaluating the active contraction distance and passive distraction distance of the ruptured musculotendinous unit during wide-awake surgery. Evaluating these distances may be a useful index to assess the ruptured musculotendinous unit. The greatest advantage of the wide-awake tendon reconstruction is that surgeons can evaluate the ruptured musculotendinous unit and measure total active motion during surgery while adjusting suture tension. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Therapeutic, IV.

Double Versus Single Tendon Transfers to Improve Shoulder Function in Brachial Plexus Birth Palsy.

In children with brachial plexus birth palsy (BPBP) undergoing tendon transfers to augment shoulder external rotation, it is unclear whether transfer of the latissimus dorsi with its combined latissimus dorsi and teres major (cLT) versus isolated teres major (iTM) tendon transfer yield different outcomes. Records of patients with BPBP who underwent shoulder tendon transfers to augment external rotation were retrospectively reviewed. Transfer type (cLT or iTM) was considered indiscriminate by virtue of surgeon preference. Modified Mallet Scale (mMS) and Active Movement Scale scores were recorded. Patients with <12 months' follow-up, C7 or lower palsy, humeral osteotomy, shoulder procedure(s) within 8 months, microsurgery within 1 year, or recurrent glenohumeral subluxation confirmed by postoperative imaging were excluded. Matched cohorts were identified within each tendon transfer group to yield similar preoperative shoulder function and glenohumeral alignment status. Outcomes for all tendon transfers as well as differences between cLT and iTM cohorts were analyzed. Among 121 cLT and 34 iTM transfers, 49 cLT and 14 iTM met the inclusion criteria. Subsequent matching of cohorts yielded 28 patients (14 cLT and 14 iTM). Average age at time of transfer was 3.0±1.4 years. Follow-up averaged 4.1±3.1 years. There were no statistically significant preoperative differences between cohorts, thus matching criteria were validated. Regardless of tendon(s) transferred, mMS external rotation improved (2.2 to 3.5, P<0.001), whereas mMS internal rotation decreased (3.8 to 3.2, P<0.001). When comparing matched cohorts, cLT transfer produced a greater mMS external rotation improvement than iTM (2.1 vs. 1.5, respectively; P=0.025). Loss of midline function (defined as mMS external rotation <3) occurred in 5 (35.7%) cLT and 2 (14.3%) iTM patients. Both cLT or iTM transfer are effective at augmenting shoulder external rotation in children with C5-C6 BPBP. Furthermore, cLT transfers may yield a larger improvement in external rotation in certain patients. However, both techniques slightly decrease shoulder internal rotation. Given that more total cLT patients lost midline function among matched cohorts, iTM transfer may still be considered when limited midline function is a concern. Level III.

Long-term results of tibialis anterior tendon transfer for relapsed idiopathic clubfoot treated with the Ponseti method: a follow-up of thirty-seven to fifty-five years.

Relapse of idiopathic clubfoot deformity after treatment can be effectively managed with repeat casting and tibialis anterior tendon transfer during early childhood. We evaluated the long-term effects on adult foot function after tibialis anterior tendon transfer for relapsed idiopathic clubfoot deformity during childhood. Thirty-five patients (sixty clubfeet) in whom idiopathic clubfoot was treated with the Ponseti method from 1950 to 1967 were followed. At an average age of forty-seven years (range, thirty-seven to fifty-five years), the patients underwent a detailed musculoskeletal examination, radiographic evaluation, pedobarographic analysis, and surface electromyography (EMG). They also completed three quality-of-life patient questionnaires. Fourteen patients (twenty-five clubfeet, 42%) had required repeat casting and tibialis anterior tendon transfer in childhood for relapsed clubfoot deformity after initial casting and served as the study group. Twenty-one patients (thirty-five clubfeet, 58%) were successfully treated with initial casting without relapse (the reference group). No patient in either group had subsequent relapse or required additional operative intervention associated with clubfoot deformity. The mean ankle dorsiflexion was similar between the groups. Radiographically, the tendon transfer group showed a smaller mean anteroposterior talocalcaneal angle and slightly more talar flattening than the reference group with no associated clinical differences. Peak pressures, total force distribution, and surface EMG results were not significantly different between the groups. Outcome questionnaires demonstrated no significant difference between the groups. Tibialis anterior tendon transfer is very effective at preventing additional relapse of deformity without affecting long-term foot function of patients with idiopathic clubfoot.

Facial Reanimation Technique for Facial Nerve Paralysis following Cancer Resection

Objectives: Analyze outcomes after static sling suspension and orthodromic temporalis tendon transfer reanimation for facial nerve paralysis after definitive cancer resection with flap reconstruction. Methods: Prospectively collected case series in which patient data were collected prospectively from 2004 to 2013 for patients undergoing reconstruction and facial reanimation after resection of malignancy which involved facial nerve sacrifice. Thirty patients were selected for 2 cohorts: static sling suspension (n = 18) and orthodromic temporalis tendon transfer (n = 12). Revision rates, length of stay, complications, time to follow-up, and postoperative symmetry were compared between the 2 groups. Results: Of the 30 patients, 18 underwent static suspension and 12 underwent temporalis tendon transfer. In the static sling group, 6 patients (33%) were advised to undergo revision compared with 2 in the temporalis tendon group (17%; P = .31). Only 4 patients underwent revision, 3 from the static group and 1 from the temporalis transfer group. Suture size, average number of sutures used to suspend the face, timing of procedure, radiation history, and flap reconstruction played no significant role between patients requiring revision surgery and those that did not. Of the patients requiring revision in the static sling group, 33% had undergone preoperative radiotherapy compared with 0% in the temporalis tendon transfer group ( P = .35). The remaining patients either underwent adjuvant therapy or were observed. Conclusions: There was no significant difference between the reconstruction methods. Static sling was performed more commonly at time of flap reconstruction.

Dissection of a Single Rat Muscle-Tendon Complex Changes Joint Moments Exerted by Neighboring Muscles: Implications for Invasive Surgical Interventions

The aim of this paper is to investigate mechanical functioning of a single skeletal muscle, active within a group of (previously) synergistic muscles. For this purpose, we assessed wrist angle-active moment characteristics exerted by a group of wrist flexion muscles in the rat for three conditions: (i) after resection of the upper arm skin; (ii) after subsequent distal tenotomy of flexor carpi ulnaris muscle (FCU); and (iii) after subsequent freeing of FCU distal tendon and muscle belly from surrounding tissues (MT dissection). Measurements were performed for a control group and for an experimental group after recovery (5 weeks) from tendon transfer of FCU to extensor carpi radialis (ECR) insertion. To assess if FCU tenotomy and MT dissection affects FCU contributions to wrist moments exclusively or also those of neighboring wrist flexion muscles, these data were compared to wrist angle-moment characteristics of selectively activated FCU. FCU tenotomy and MT dissection decreased wrist moments of the control group at all wrist angles tested, including also angles for which no or minimal wrist moments were measured when activating FCU exclusively. For the tendon transfer group, wrist flexion moment increased after FCU tenotomy, but to a greater extent than can be expected based on wrist extension moments exerted by selectively excited transferred FCU. We conclude that dissection of a single muscle in any surgical treatment does not only affect mechanical characteristics of the target muscle, but also those of other muscles within the same compartment. Our results demonstrate also that even after agonistic-to-antagonistic tendon transfer, mechanical interactions with previously synergistic muscles do remain present.

Mechanical effect of rat flexor carpi ulnaris muscle after tendon transfer: does it generate a wrist extension moment?

The mechanical effect of a muscle following agonist-to-antagonist tendon transfers does not always meet the surgeon's expectations. We tested the hypothesis that after flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) to extensor carpi radialis (ECR) tendon transfer in the rat, the direction (flexion or extension) of the muscle's joint moment is dependent on joint angle. Five weeks after recovery from surgery (tendon transfer group) and in a control group, wrist angle-moment characteristics of selectively activated FCU muscle were assessed for progressive stages of dissection: 1) with minimally disrupted connective tissues, 2) after distal tenotomy, and 3) after maximal tendon and muscle belly dissection, but leaving blood supply and innervations intact. In addition, force transmission from active FCU onto the distal tendon of passive palmaris longus (PL) muscle (a wrist flexor) was assessed. Excitation of control FCU yielded flexion moments at all wrist angles tested. Tenotomy decreased peak FCU moment substantially (by 93%) but not fully. Only after maximal dissection, FCU wrist moment became negligible. The mechanical effect of transferred FCU was bidirectional: extension moments in flexed wrist positions and flexion moments in extended wrist positions. Tenotomy decreased peak extension moment (by 33%) and increased peak flexion moment of transferred FCU (by 41%). Following subsequent maximal FCU dissection, FCU moments decreased to near zero at all wrist angles tested. We confirmed that, after transfer of FCU towards a wrist extensor insertion, force can be transmitted from active FCU to the distal tendon of passive PL. We conclude that mechanical effects of a muscle after tendon transfer to an antagonistic site can be quite different from those predicted based solely on the sign of the new moment arm at the joint.

Effects of tendon and muscle belly dissection on muscular force transmission following tendon transfer in the rat

The aim of the present study was to quantify to what extent the scar tissue formation following the transfer of flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) to the distal tendon of extensor carpi radialis (ECR) affects the force transmission from transferred FCU in the rat. Five weeks after recovery from surgery (tendon transfer group) and in a control group, isometric length–force characteristics of FCU were assessed for progressive stages of dissection: (i) with minimally disrupted connective tissues, (ii) after full dissection of FCU distal tendon exclusively, and (iii) after additional partial dissection of FCU muscle belly.Total and passive length–force characteristics of transferred and control FCU changed significantly by progressive stages of dissection. In both groups, tendon dissection decreased passive FCU force exerted at the distal tendon, as well as the slope of the length–force curve. However, force and slope changes were more pronounced for transferred FCU compared to controls. No additional changes occurred after muscle belly dissection. In contrast, total force increased in transferred FCU following both tendon and muscle belly dissection at all lengths studied, while dissection decreased total force of control FCU. In addition, after tendon and muscle belly dissection, we found decreased muscle belly lengths at equal muscle–tendon complex lengths of transferred FCU.We conclude that scar tissue limits the force transmission from transferred FCU muscle via the tendon of insertion to the skeleton, but that some myofascial connectivity of the muscle should be classified as physiological.

Adaptation in Sensorimotor Control After Restoration of Grip and Pinch in Children with Tetraplegia

This study examined how restoration of grip and pinch influenced sensorimotor control in 16 participants with tetraplegia, 8 to 20 years of age. Clinical measures and grip-lift task performance under two frictional conditions were recorded at baseline and 2 and 6 months after tendon transfers or neuroprosthesis implant. All participants improved strength, dexterity, function, and static grip force during lifts from baseline. Task completion time shortened in the tendon transfer group and lengthened in the neuroprosthesis group postoperatively. Only the tendon transfer group exhibited differential force scaling for texture and showed two-point discrimination and strength to predict temporal and force coordination by 6 months. Sensibility and biomechanical features of the neuroprosthesis likely contributed to group differences in resultant sensorimotor control.

Functional restoration of elbow flexion in brachial plexus injuries: Results in 167 patients (excluding obstetric brachial plexus injury)

From 1985 to 1990, 167 patients were treated for impaired elbow flexion caused by brachial plexus injury. Surgical procedures were divided into two categories: nerve reconstruction (128 patients) and muscle or tendon transfers (39 patients). Surgery in the nerve reconstruction group included direct suturing, nerve grafting of portions of the brachial plexus responsible for elbow flexion, or nerve transfer (intercostal, phrenic, or spinal accessory nerve) to the musculocutaneous nerve. The second category included tendon or muscle transfer or a functioning free muscle transplantation for biceps replacement. Results were assessed by the Medical Research Council grading system and weight-lifting evaluation. Functional results revealed that nerve reconstruction was superior to muscle tendon transfers, direct suturing was superior to nerve grafting, short nerve grafts (<10 cm) were superior to long nerve grafts (>10 cm), infraclavicular plexus injuries did better than supraclavicular injuries, vascularized ulnar nerve grafts (if indicated) were superior to conventional long nerve grafts, ruptured plexus injuries recovered better than root avulsions. Intercostal nerve transfer to the musculocutaneous nerve has satisfactory results. In the muscle tendon transfer group, Steindler flexorplasty resulted in upgrading muscle strength from level one to level two. Functioning free muscle transplantation had results similar to the latissimus dorsi transfer.