Temporary Control Of Bleeding Research Articles

Prehospital Management of Postpartum Hemorrhage-A National, Cross-Sectional Study in Norway.

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a critical birth complication, and is stated by the World Health Organization (WHO) as among the five most frequent causes of death during pregnancy. External aortic compression (EAC) is recommended by the WHO as an intervention to achieve temporary bleeding control. An increasing number of births outside hospital underlines the importance of competence in handling potential birth complications, such as PPH. The aim of this study was to assess prehospital personnel's education, training, knowledge, and experiences regarding PPH and EAC across Norway. Prehospital personnel were invited to respond to a questionnaire through social media. Questions included those on education, training, knowledge, and experience regarding PPH and EAC. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 28 was used to analyze the data, using descriptive statistics. Over a two-month period, 211 prehospital personnel responded to the questionnaire, of whom 55.5% were male. The respondents had an average of 10.3 years of prehospital experience. About half of the respondents had received education (48.6%) and training (62.4%) in PPH management. Still, 95.7 percent reported a need for more education and training. On knowledge questions, only half of the responses were correct (43.7% to 60.5%). Only 21 percent of the respondents had experienced patients with PPH, and of these only 3.8 percent had used EAC. Bimanual uterine compression was the most frequent intervention used (62.5%) across hospital trusts. Even if prehospital personnel receive education and training in the management of PPH and EAC, almost all report needing more. The results indicate a national variation, which may be discussed as to whether it is appropriate.

Using computed tomography to evaluate anatomic landmarks in taiwanese trauma patients for insertion of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: A retrospective cohort study.

Hemorrhage, particularly from non-compressible torso hemorrhage (NCTH) in the abdominopelvic region, is a leading cause of preventable trauma deaths. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA), designed for aortic occlusion, has emerged as a tool for temporary hemorrhage control in recent years. However, attaining optimal REBOA placement in diverse demographic groups, such as Asian populations, may pose challenges owing to unique anatomical and physiological differences. This retrospective study analyzed trauma patients who underwent torso computed tomography (CT) at tertiary hospitals in Taiwan from January 2014 to January 2017. The OsiriX software was used to measure the endovascular lengths in the CT images. Among the 223 patients, the median vascular lengths and body measurements were higher in males. The optimal fixed insertion length was identified as 47.5cm for zone 1 with 99.43% accuracy and 25.5cm with 82.1% accuracy for zone 3. The landmark-guided method showed 100% accuracy for zone 1 when using the mid-sternum and 94.6% for zone 3 with the umbilicus as the guide with the distance between the umbilicus, xiphoid process, and pubic ramus. External validation confirmed the accuracy of the landmark-guided method. For zone 1 occlusions, a range of 44-48cm insertion length cross-referenced with the mid-sternal landmark is recommended. For zone 3 occlusions, using the umbilicus as a guide with the distance between the umbilicus, xiphoid process, and pubic ramus provided the highest accuracy.

An assessment of nationwide trends in emergency department (ED) resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) use – A trauma quality improvement program registry analysis

BackgroundUse of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for temporary hemorrhage control in severe non-compressible torso trauma remains controversial, with limited data on patient selection and outcomes. This study aims to analyze the nationwide trends of its use in the emergency department (EDs). MethodsA retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS-TQIP) from 2017 to 2022 was performed, focusing on REBOA placements in EDs. ResultsThe analysis included 3398 REBOA procedures. Majority patients were male (76 ​%) with a median age of 40 years (27–58) and injury severity score of 20 (20–41). The most common mechanism was collision (64 ​%), with emergency surgeries most frequently performed for pelvic trauma (14 ​%). Level 1 trauma centers performed 82 ​% of these procedures, with consistent low annual utilization (<200 facilities). Survival rates were 85 ​% at 1-h post-placement, decreasing significantly to 42 ​% by discharge. ConclusionsREBOA usage in remains limited but steady, primarily occurring at level 1 trauma center EDs. While short-term survival rates are favorable, they drop significantly by the time of discharge.

REBOA Improves Outcomes in Hybrid Surgery for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Despite advancements in diagnostic methods and emergency interventions, mortality rates of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) continue to remain high. To address this issue, the resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) technique has been designed to provide temporary control of bleeding. We aimed to compare the impact of the REBOA technique during open aortic surgery for rAAA. Between January 2014 and November 2021, 53 consecutive patients (46 males, 7 females; mean age 71.9±7.9years; range 51-89years) who underwent emergency open aortic surgery for rAAA were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into REBOA (21 patients) and non-REBOA (32 patients) groups. The primary outcomes were postoperative 24-hr and 30-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) stay, in-hospital stay, bleeding, postoperative renal failure, bowel ischemia, and transient ischemic attack (TIA)/stroke rate. The REBOA group showed a significant reduction in mortality rates at both 24hr (9.5% vs. 37.5%, P=0.029) and 30days (14.2% vs. 43.7%, P=0.035) compared to the non-REBOA group. In-hospital stay (12.8±3.48 vs. 15.6±4.74days, P=0.02) and ICU stay (2.42±2.08 vs. 5.09±5.79days, P=0.048) were shorter among the REBOA group. Total procedure time and bleeding were reduced among the REBOA group without significant differences in terms of postoperative renal failure, bowel ischemia, and TIA/stroke rate. The REBOA group demonstrated significantly improved survival rates compared to the non-REBOA group, without a significant difference in complication rates. REBOA is considered a less invasive option compared to the traditional method for open aortic cross-clamping. This study demonstrated that the use of REBOA may be considered as a first-line treatment option for open surgery in cases of rAAA particularly when an off-the-shelf endovascular aneurysm repair device is not suitable.

International registry on aortic balloon occlusion in major trauma: Partial inflation does not improve outcomes in abdominal trauma

BackgroundResuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a method for temporary hemorrhage control used in haemodynamically unwell patients with severe bleeding. In haemodynamically unwell abdominal trauma patients, laparotomy remains the initial procedure of choice. Using REBOA in patients as a bridge to laparotomy is a novel option whose feasibility and efficacy remain unclear. We aimed to assess the clinical outcome in patients with abdominal injury who underwent both REBOA placement and laparotomy. MethodsThis is a retrospective study, including trauma patients with an isolated abdominal injury who underwent both REBOA placement and laparotomy, during the period 2011–2019. All data were collected via the Aortic Balloon Occlusion Trauma Registry database. ResultsOne hundred and three patients were included in this study. The main mechanism of trauma was blunt injury (62.1%) and the median injury severity score (ISS) was 33 (14–74). Renal failure and multi-organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) occurred in 15.5% and 35% of patients, respectively. Overall, 30-day mortality was 50.5%. Post balloon inflation systolic blood pressure (SBP) >80 mmHg was associated with lower 24-h mortality (p = 0.007). No differences in mortality were found among patients who underwent partial occlusion vs. total occlusion of the aorta. ConclusionsOur results support the feasibility of REBOA use in patients with isolated abdominal injury, with survival rates similar to previous reports for haemodynamically unstable abdominal trauma patients. Post-balloon inflation SBP >80 mmHg was associated with a significant reduction in 24-h mortality rates, but not 30-day mortality. Total aortic occlusion was not associated with increased mortality, MODS, and complication rates compared with partial occlusion.

Internal carotid artery injury during endoscopic endonasal surgery for skull base pathologies: an institutional incidence, management, and outcome.

Endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) has become a popular approach to deal with skull base pathologies. The most catastrophic intra-operative complication of EES is internal carotid artery (ICA) injury. We aim to discuss and introduce our institutional experience with ICA injury during EES. A retrospective review of patients who underwent EES from 2013 to 2022 was performed to determine the incidence and outcomes of intraoperative ICA injuries. There were six patients (0.56%) with intraoperative ICA injury in our institution during the last 10 years. Fortunately, there was no morbidity or mortality in our patients with intraoperative ICA injuries. The sites of injury were equally in paraclival, cavernous sinus, and preclinoidal segments of ICA. Primary prevention is the best solution for this condition. Regarding our institutional experience, the best option for primary management just after an injury is packing the surgical site. In cases where packing is not enough for temporary control of bleeding, common carotid artery occlusion should be considered. We have presented our experience and reviewed previous studies regarding different treatments and suggested our intra and post-operative management algorithm.

Massive bleeding from gastric ulcer-induced splenic artery pseudoaneurysm successfully treated with transcatheter arterial embolization and surgery: a case report

BackgroundUpper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a routine medical emergency. The most common non-variceal cause is peptic ulcer disease, while a rare presentation is peptic ulcer-induced splenic artery pseudoaneurysm (SAP). Primary endoscopic treatment is generally attempted for UGIB; however, it sometimes fails when arterial etiology is present. In such cases, either transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) or surgery is necessary, but the choice of treatment is controversial. We present a case that illustrates the utility of both approaches in a gastric ulcer-induced SAP.Case presentationA 33-year-old male presented with hemorrhagic shock secondary to UGIB. The source of bleeding was identified as an SAP that was caused by a gastric ulcer. TAE enabled temporary bleeding control despite the patient’s poor overall condition and limited blood transfusion capability. However, rebleeding occurred soon after stabilization. Ultimately, we performed proximal gastrectomy and splenic artery ligation, and the patient survived.ConclusionsSAP is an uncommon occurrence, and angiographic information is important for correctly identifying the source of bleeding. The treatment for SAP bleeding is basically the same as for endoscopically unmanageable non-variceal UGIB, since TAE and surgery each have a different utility, depending on the situation. If surgery is performed, especially SA ligation and gastrectomy, it is important to consider the circulation of the spleen and residual stomach. Using TAE and laparotomy, we managed to save the life of the patient with massive hemorrhage under limited circumstances.

Manual Pressure Points Technique for Massive Hemorrhage Control—A Prospective Human Volunteer Study

Background While commonly thought to be effective for management of limb and junctional hemorrhage, the manual pressure points technique was excluded from leading prehospital guidelines over a decade ago following the publication of a single human-volunteers study presenting unfavorable results. This work aimed to re-assess the efficacy and feasibility of the femoral and supraclavicular pressure points technique for temporary hemorrhage control distal to the pressure point. Methods A prospective, non-randomized, human volunteer, controlled environment study. In the study 35 healthy male combat medics (age 21.1 ± 1.3 years) received brief training after which they were requested to apply pressure in the femoral and supraclavicular points in attempts to stop regional blood flow, measured distally by Doppler ultrasound. Success rates in achieving flow cessation in under 2 minutes, time required for achievement of flow cessation, and cumulative flow cessation duration within a 3-minute follow-up after initial success were measured. Results For the supraclavicular point, success rates were 97.1% with a mean time to success of 12.5 (±20.9) seconds, lasting for 76.2% (±23.7) of the follow-up time. For the femoral point, success rates were 100% with a mean time to success of 5.5 (±4.3) seconds, lasting for 98.7% (±3.8) of the follow-up time. Conclusions Manual pressure on the femoral and supraclavicular points is an applicable and efficient method for temporary hemorrhage control distal to the pressure point. As such, with additional study, this method may be considered for re-introduction to prehospital care guidelines and training programs.

Traumatic Cardiac Arrest: Scoping Review of Utilization of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta

Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) is increasingly used in trauma resuscitation for patients with life-threatening hemorrhage below the diaphragm and may also be used for patients with traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA). Resuscitative thoracotomy with aortic cross clamping (RT-ACC) maneuver was traditionally performed for patients with TCA due to hemorrhagic shock; however, REBOA has been substituted for RT-ACC in selected TCA cases. During cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in TCA, REBOA increases cerebral and coronary perfusion, and temporary bleeding control. Both animal and clinical studies have reported the efficacy of REBOA for TCA, and a recent observational study suggested that REBOA may contribute to the return of spontaneous circulation after TCA. Although multiple questions remain unanswered, REBOA has been applied to trauma fields as a novel technology.

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in severely injured patients in the emergency trauma room: a case series

Eine Hämorrhagie ist in 30–40 % der Patienten, die im Rahmen eines Traumas versterben, todesursächlich und die häufigste vermeidbare Todesursache. Für nichtkomprimierbare Blutungen im Bereich des Abdomens oder des Beckens wird in den letzten Jahren zunehmend (wieder) die Anwendung der „resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta“ (REBOA) zur temporären Blutungskontrolle diskutiert. Seit August 2020 steht im Schockraum des Universitären Notfallzentrums des Universitätsspital Bern die REBOA als Therapieoption im Rahmen der Schwerverletztenversorgung zur Verfügung. Wir berichten in dieser Fallserie unsere Erfahrungen aus allen 7 Anwendungen im Laufe des ersten Jahres.

Educating and Empowering Inner-City High School Students in Bleeding Control

IntroductionUnintentional bleeding is the leading cause of death in people 1–44 years of age in the United States. The Stop the Bleed (STB) campaign is a nationwide course that teaches the public to ensure their own safety, call 911, find the bleeding injury, and achieve temporary hemorrhage control by several techniques. Although the national campaign for the training course was inspired by active shooter events, the training can be applied to motor vehicle accidents and small-scale penetrating and gunshot wounds. Extending the audience to inner-city high school students in a violence-prone neighborhood has the potential to save lives if they are first on the scene.ObjectivesWe hypothesized that students would have a greater degree of comfort, willingness, and preparedness to intervene in acute bleeding after taking the course.MethodsThis was a prospective, interventional pilot study in one inner-city high school in Brooklyn, New York. Students were given the option to participate in the STB course with pre- and post-surveys. We recruited 286 students from physical education or health education class to take a 50-minute bleeding control training course. Mean age was 15.7 years old. Students were divided into groups of 20–25 and taught by 2–3 emergency medicine, pediatric, or trauma surgery STB instructors. Each course included 2–3 skills stations for placing a tourniquet, wound packing, and pressure control.ResultsPrior to the course, only 43.8% of the students reported being somewhat likely or very likely to help an injured person who was bleeding. After the course, this increased to 80.8% of students even if no bleeding control kit was available. Additionally, there were significant improvements in self-rated comfort level from pre- to post-course 45.4% to 76.5%, and in self-rated preparedness from 25.1% to 83.8%. All three measures showed statistically significant improvement, P <.0001.ConclusionTeaching the STB course to high school students from a community with high levels of violence resulted in increased comfort level, willingness, and preparedness to act to control bleeding. If these opinions translate into action, students’ willingness to act could decrease pre-hospital blood loss and empower youth to perform life-saving interventions.

Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta in Penetrating Trauma.

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) achieves temporary hemorrhage control via aortic occlusion. Existing REBOA literature focuses on blunt trauma without a clearly defined role in penetrating trauma. This study compared clinical/injury data and outcomes after REBOA in penetrating vs blunt trauma. All patients in the Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (AORTA) database, an observational American Association for the Surgery of Trauma dataset of trauma patients requiring aortic occlusion, who underwent REBOA were included (January 2014 through February 2021). Study groups were defined by mechanism: penetrating vs blunt. Subgroup analysis was performed of patients arriving with vital signs. Univariable/multivariable analyses compared injuries and outcomes. Seven hundred fifty-nine patients underwent REBOA: 152 (20%) penetrating and 607 (80%) blunt. Patients undergoing penetrating REBOA were less severely injured (injury severity score 25 vs 34; p < 0.001). The most common hemorrhage source was abdominal in penetrating REBOA (79%) and pelvic in blunt REBOA (31%; p = 0.002). Penetrating REBOA was more likely to occur in the operating room (36% vs 17%) and less likely in the emergency department (63% vs 81%; p < 0.001). Penetrating REBOA used more zone I balloon deployment (76% vs 64%) and less zone III (19% vs 34%; p = 0.001). Improved or stabilized hemodynamics were less frequent after penetrating REBOA (41% vs 62%, p < 0.001; 23% vs 41%, p < 0.001). On subgroup analysis of patients arriving alive, improvement or stabilization in hemodynamics was similar between groups (87% vs 86%, p = 0.388; 77% vs 72%, p = 0.273). Penetrating REBOA was not independently associated with mortality (odds ratio 1.253; p = 0.776). Despite lower injury severity, REBOA was significantly less likely to improve or stabilize hemodynamics after penetrating trauma. Among patients arriving alive, however, outcomes were comparable, suggesting that penetrating REBOA may be most beneficial among patients with vital signs. Because hemorrhage source, catheter insertion setting, and deployment zone varied significantly between groups, existing blunt REBOA data may not be appropriately extrapolated to penetrating trauma. Further study of REBOA as a means of aortic occlusion in penetrating trauma is needed.

Morphometric Analysis of the Aorto-Esophageal Relationship in Swine for Trans-Esophageal Aortic Blood Flow Occlusion

Background&#x0D; Trans-esophageal aortic blood flow occlusion (TEABO) is an emerging technology undergoing laboratory research that offers a strategy for temporary hemorrhage control. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anatomical relationship between the esophagus and descending thoracic aorta in two breeds of swine to support a porcine model for future TEABO investigations.&#x0D; Methods &#x0D; Thoracoabdominal CT scans were compared in Hanford miniature swine and Yorkshire swine. Measurements were taken at the five vertebral levels proximal to the gastroesophageal junction. Data collected included the distance between the center of the esophagus and the center of the descending aorta, the angle between the vertebral column, descending aorta, and esophagus, and the length the thoracic esophagus travels anteriorly to the descending aorta.&#x0D; Results &#x0D; Ten Hanford swine and ten Yorkshire swine were compared. In Hanford swine, the distal thoracic esophagus travels anteriorly to the descending aorta for a mean distance of 11.5 ± 2.3 cm. In Yorkshire swine, the thoracic esophagus travels to the right of the descending aorta. The mean angle between the vertebral body, descending aorta, and esophagus was 79.6 to 97.8 degrees higher in Hanfords compared to Yorkshires (p&lt;0.0001 at all five vertebral levels compared). The mean distance between the esophagus and descending aorta was 0.2 to 0.6 cm higher in Hanfords compared to Yorkshires with a significant difference found at only two vertebral levels (p=0.01 and p=0.02).&#x0D; Conclusion &#x0D; Hanford miniature swine possess an aorto-esophageal relationship comparable to humans and should be the preferred animal model for TEABO studies.

Damage control in abdominal vascular trauma.

In patients with abdominal trauma who require laparotomy, up to a quarter or a third will have a vascular injury. The venous structures mainly injured are the vena cava (29%) and the iliac veins (20%), and arterial vessels are the iliac arteries (16%) and the aorta (14%). The initial approach is performed following the ATLS principles. This manuscript aims to present the surgical approach to abdominal vascular trauma following damage control principles. The priority in a trauma laparotomy is bleeding control. Hemorrhages of intraperitoneal origin are controlled by applying pressure, clamping, packing, and retroperitoneal with selective pressure. After the temporary bleeding control is achieved, the compromised vascular structure must be identified, according to the location of the hematomas. The management of all lesions should be oriented towards the expeditious conclusion of the laparotomy, focusing efforts on the bleeding control and contamination, with a postponement of the definitive management. Their management of vascular injuries includes ligation, transient bypass, and packing of selected low-pressure vessels and bleeding surfaces. Subsequently, the unconventional closure of the abdominal cavity should be performed, preferably with negative pressure systems, to reoperate once the hemodynamic alterations and coagulopathy have been corrected to carry out the definitive management.

Damage control of peripheral vascular trauma - Don't be afraid of axillary or popliteal fosses.

Peripheral vascular injuries are uncommon in civilian trauma but can threaten the patient’s life or the viability of the limb. The definitive control of the vascular injury represents a surgical challenge, especially if the patient is hemodynamically unstable. This article proposes the management of peripheral vascular trauma following damage control surgery principles. It is essential to rapidly identify vascular injury signs and perform temporary bleeding control maneuvers. The surgical approaches according to the anatomical injured region should be selected. We propose two novel approaches to access the axillary and popliteal zones. The priority should be to reestablish limb perfusion via primary repair or damage control techniques (vascular shunt or endovascular approach). Major vascular surgeries should be managed post-operatively in the intensive care unit, which will allow correction of physiological derangement and identification of those developing compartmental syndrome. All permanent or temporary vascular procedures should be followed by a definitive repair within the first 8 hours. An early diagnosis and opportune intervention are fundamental to preserve the function and perfusion of the extremity.

Comparison of pelvic C-clamp and pelvic binder for emergency stabilization and bleeding control in type-C pelvic ring fractures

Severe bleeding is the major cause of death in unstable pelvic ring fractures. Therefore, a quick and efficient emergency stabilization and bleeding control is inevitable. C-clamp and pelvic binder are efficient tools for temporary bleeding control, especially from the posterior pelvic ring. Yet the C-clamp requires more user knowledge, training and equipment. However, whether this makes up for a more efficient bleeding control, is still under debate. Patients with a type-C pelvic ring fracture were identified from the German Pelvic Registry (GPR) and divided into three groups of 40 patients (1. no emergency stabilization, 2. pelvic binder, 3. C-clamp). The matching occurred according to the parameters age, gender, initial RR and initial HB. Complication—and mortality rates were compared especially regarding bleeding control. Regarding ISS and fracture dislocation there was no difference. The use of the C-clamp resulted in more complications, a higher mortality rate due to severe bleeding and more blood transfusions were admitted. Moreover the pelvic binder was established noticeably faster. However, the C-clamp was more often rated as effective. There is no evidence of advantage comparing the C-clamp to the pelvic binder, regarding bleeding control in type-C pelvic ring fractures. In fact, using the pelvic binder even showed better results, as the time until established bleeding control was significantly shorter. Therefore, the pelvic binder should be the first choice. The C-clamp should remain a measure for selected cases only, if an adequate bleeding control cannot be achieved by the pelvic binder.

Quantifying the need for pediatric REBOA: A gap analysis

BackgroundTrauma is the leading cause of death in children. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) provides temporary hemorrhage control, but its potential benefit has not been assessed in children. We hypothesized that there are pediatric patients who may benefit from REBOA. MethodsTrauma patients <18 years old at a level 1 pediatric trauma center between 2009 and 2019 were queried for deaths, pre-hospital cardiac arrest, massive transfusion protocol activation, transfusion requirement, or hemorrhage control surgery. These patients defined the cohort of severely injured patients. From this cohort, patients with intraabdominal injuries for which REBOA may provide temporary hemorrhage control were identified, including solid organ injury necessitating intervention, vascular injury, or pelvic hemorrhage. ResultsThere were 239 severely injured patients out of 6538 pediatric traumas. Of these, 38 had REBOA-amenable injuries (15.9%) with 34.2% mortality, accounting for 10.2% of all pediatric trauma deaths at one center. Eleven patients with REBOA-amenable injuries had TBI (28.9%). Patients with REBOA-amenable injuries represented 0.6% of all pediatric traumas. ConclusionNearly 20% of severely injured pediatric patients could potentially benefit from REBOA. The overall proportion of pediatric patients with REBOA-amenable injuries is similar to adult studies. Type of StudyRetrospective comparative study. Level of EvidenceLevel III.

Prospective Observational Evaluation of the ER-REBOA Catheter at 6 U.S. Trauma Centers

To describe the current use of the ER-REBOA catheter and associated outcomes and complications. Noncompressible truncal hemorrhage is the leading cause of potentially preventable death in trauma patients. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a novel strategy to obtain earlier temporary hemorrhage control, supporting cardiac, and cerebral perfusion before definitive hemostasis. Prospective, observational study conducted at 6 Level 1 Trauma Centers over 12-months. Inclusion criteria were age >15 years of age with evidence of truncal hemorrhage below the diaphragm and decision for emergent hemorrhage control intervention within 60 minutes of arrival. REBOA details, demographics, mechanism of injury, complications, and outcomes were collected. A total of 8166 patients were screened for enrollment. In 75, REBOA was utilized for temporary hemorrhage control. Blunt injury occurred in 80% with a median injury severity score (ISS) 34 (21, 43). Forty-seven REBOAs were placed in Zone 1 and 28 in Zone 3. REBOA inflation increased systolic blood pressure from 67 (40, 83) mm Hg to 108 (90, 128) mm Hg 5 minutes after inflation (P = 0.02). Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was ongoing during REBOA insertion in 17 patients (26.6%) and 10 patients (58.8%) had return of spontaneous circulation after REBOA inflation. The procedural complication rate was 6.6%. Overall mortality was 52%. REBOA can be used in blunt and penetrating trauma patients, including those in arrest. Balloon inflation uniformly improved hemodynamics and was associated with a 59% rate of return of spontaneous circulation for patients in arrest. Use of the ER-REBOA catheter is technically safe with a low procedural complication rate.

A contemporary assessment of devices for Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA): resource-specific options per level of care.

Use of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) as adjunct for temporary hemorrhage control in patients with exsanguinating torso hemorrhage is increasing. Characteristics of aortic occlusion balloons (AOB) are diverse and evolving as efforts are made to improve the technology. It is important to select a device that fits the requirements of the medical situation to minimize the risk of failure and complications. The aim of this study is to appraise guidance in the choice of an AOB in a specific situation. We assessed 29 AOB for differences and outline possible advantages and disadvantages of each. Bending stiffness was measured with a three-point bending device. Diameter of the AOB ranged from 6 (ER-REBOA™) to 10 (Coda®-46) French. However, some need large-bore access sheaths up to 22 French (Fogarty®-45 and LeMaitre®-45) or even insertion via cut-down (Equalizer™-40). Bending stiffness varied from 0.08N/mm (± 0.008 SD; Coda®-32) to 0.72N/mm (± 0.024 SD; Russian prototype). Rescue Balloon™ showed kinking of the shaft at low bending pressures. The only non-compliant AOB is REBOA Balloon®. ER-REBOA™, Fogarty®, LeMaitre®, REBOA Balloon®, and Rescue Balloon™ are provided with external length marks to assist blind positioning. In resource-limited settings, a guidewire- and fluoroscopy-free, rather stiff device, such as ER-REBOA™, Fogarty®, and LeMaitre®, is warranted. Of these devices, ER-REBOA™ is the only catheter compatible with seven French sheaths and specifically designed for emergency hemorrhage control. Of the over-the-wire devices, Q50® has several features that facilitate use and reduce the risk of malplacement or vessel damage.

REBOA as a rescue strategy for catastrophic vascular injury during robotic surgery.

Catastrophic bleeding is a feared complication of robotic abdominal procedures that involve dissection in close proximity to major vessels. In the event of uncontrollable hemorrhage, standard practice involves emergency undocking with conversion to laparotomy. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a rapid and life-saving technique gaining acceptance in the trauma setting for the management of catastrophic hemorrhage. The purpose of this study was to evaluate feasibility of REBOA for emergency hemostasis during robotic surgery. The surgical robot was docked to a REBOA mannequin to simulate an upper abdominal surgery. A femoral arterial line was placed in the mannequin. Supplies needed for REBOA insertion were opened and arranged on the surgical back table. The surgeon was seated at the console with an assistant scrubbed. A catastrophic vascular injury was announced. The time it took the surgeon to achieve aortic occlusion by the REBOA was recorded. Four surgeons participated and performed three timed trials each. Each surgeon, irrespective of experience with REBOA or years in surgical practice, was able to obtain aortic occlusion in less than 2min. The mean time to aortic occlusion for all surgeons was 111s. No manipulation of the robotic arms was required to perform the procedure. Aortic occlusion was achieved rapidly with REBOA. Ability to achieve prompt aortic control was not associated with surgical experience or prior familiarity with the REBOA device. Prophylactic femoral access and preparation of supplies facilitates prompt placement of the occlusion balloon. REBOA should be considered as a viable alternative to open laparotomy for temporary hemorrhage control during robotic surgery.