Kuya is widely known as a tenth-century Buddhist holy man who was first to spread nenbutsu practice among common lay people. The document that scholars regard as most credible for understanding who Kuya was is Kuyarui, which is a eulogy for Kuya written in Sino-Japanese (kanbun) in 970s by author of Sanboe, Minamoto Tamenori. This article first elucidates origins and influence of text. Then it approaches text as a piece of Buddhist biographical literature and examines its depiction of Kuya. It is argued that Kuya is depicted in Kuyarui not primarily as a nenbutsu practitioner but as a selfless holy man who rejects any status in world, yet serves it by promoting Buddhism in a variety of ways and by striving to relieve suffering of others. Finally, a translation of complete Kuyarui is provided. KEYWORDS: Kuya - nenbutsu - rui - Minamoto Tamenori - religious biography - shonin (ProQuest: ... denotes non-USASCII text omitted.) Kuya's life has long been deemed worth remembering.1 For over a thousand years depictions of him have been produced by a wide range of people, including aristocrats, Buddhist priests, tea-whisk makers, playwrights, novelists, sculptors, painters, dancers, musicians, and comedians (Ito and Miura [1993, 49] refer to Kuya as a rapper of namu Amida butsu). Accounts about Kuya can be found in collections of religious biographies (ojoden and kosoden), temple foundation stories (engi), an illustrated biography (eshiden), a noh play, medieval tale literature (setsuwa), and in most textbooks on Japanese history used in Japanese high schools. Historians today and much of general public remember Kuya2 as first to spread recitation of nenbutsu among common people, and many say he was founder of dancing nenbutsu (odori nenbutsu). He is thus seen as important for understanding history of Japanese Buddhism, particularly Pure Land Buddhism. Because of his perceived historical significance, scholars have frequently tried to reconstruct a historically accurate account of his life. To do this, they have accepted only a few primary sources as credible: a description of a dedication ceremony held by Kuya in 963 written by Miyoshi Michimune ... that is included in Honcho monzui ... (359-60); a brief biography of Kuya by Yoshishige Yasutane ... in Nihon ojogokurakuki ...; and a eulogy titled Kuyarui ... written by Minamoto Tamenori ... while a university student in Kyoto. Of these, scholars regard Kuyarui as most important source because it is earliest text to give an overview of his life and much of its contents, as will be shown below, are repeated in Yasutane's later and briefer account of Kuya's life. Using Kuyarui (hereafter, Rui) as their primary historical source on life of Kuya and on basis of particular understandings of religion in tenth century, historians have made claims about what type of person Kuya was. He is most commonly located in tradition of wandering ascetics (hijiri), particularly nenbutsu hijiri. Frequently, he has also been seen as a shamanic figure, a perception that is based largely on a depiction of him in Rui reciting nenbutsu while burning skeletal remains and on an assumption that his nenbutsu was regarded as a magical practice (see, for example, INOUE 1975, 237-38; KITAGAWA 1966, 117; HAYAMI 1996, 11). The Rui, however, does not depict Kuya as exhibiting any of characteristics most closely associated with shamanism, namely, ecstasy, spirit possession, or soul flight. Some historians, rather than reading Rui simply as a source to reconstruct life of Kuya, have analyzed it as a document that provides insight into religion of late tenth-century Japan. Hayami Tasuku, for example, has argued that depiction of Kuya in Rui reflects the ideal image of a nenbutsu proselytizer held by nobility (Hayami 1996, 26). …
Read full abstract