polyetiology, progressive course and high frequency of relapses is one of the urgent problems of modern dentistry. Different conceptual approaches to the analysis of etiological and pathogenetic aspects of the development of dysfunctional TMJ disorders predetermine the increased interest in the search for highly informative diagnostic methods, especially at the stage of preclinical manifestations.Goal. Evaluation of possibilities of computerized joint vibration analysis method in diagnostics of TMJ functional state.Materials and methods. The study involved 42 people of both sexes with physiologic types of bite, preserved tooth rows, no signs of functional disorders in TMJ and masticatory muscles. The patients underwent clinical dental examination, «Hamburg test», selective grinding of teeth, and measurement of mouth opening amplitude. Joint vibration analysis was performed on the hardware-software complex «BioPAK» with registration of TMJ noise oscillations according to the following indices: «Total Integral», «High Integral», «Low Integral», «Ratio». A flow chart (Ishigaki S. et al., 1993) was used to interpret the numerical values. The functional state of TMJ was de-termined according to the flowchart using numerical parameters in accordance with the classification of TMJ disorders (Wilkes С.Н., 1989).Results. In patients with physiologic occlusion, according to joint vibration analysis, Me «Total Integral» of the right TMJ was 11.7 PaHz, left TMJ – 12.6 PaHz, [Q-25; Q-75] – [9.3; 15.1] PaHz and [10.5; 18.3] PaHz respectively, Me «High Integral» of the right TMJ – 1.3 PaHz, left TMJ – 1.4 PaHz, [Q-25; Q-75] – [1.0; 1.8] PaHz and [1.2; 2.1] PaHz respectively, with no statistically significant (p≤0.05) differences in the studied parameters between the right and left TMJ.Conclusions. The diagnosis of «structurally intact» TMJ, corresponding to stage I of the American classification of TMJ disorders (Wilkes S.N., 1989) in people with physiologic types of bite, is confirmed by the numerical values [Q-25; Q-75] of «Total Integral», «High Integral» (block diagram of S. Ishigaki et al., 1993), the degree of maximum mouth opening [43; 50] mm in the absence of pronounced signs of facial asymmetry.