Telomeric DNA Binding Protein Research Articles

AtTBP2 and AtTRP2 in Arabidopsis encode proteins that bind plant telomeric DNA and induce DNA bending in vitro

Telomeric DNA-binding proteins (TBPs) are crucial components that regulate the structure and function of eukaryotic telomeres and are evolutionarily conserved. We have identified two homologues of AtTBP1 (for Arabidopsis thaliana telomeric DNA binding protein 1), designated as AtTBP2 and AtTRP2, which encode proteins that specifically bind to the telomeric DNA of this plant. These proteins show extensive homology with other known plant TBPs. The isolated C-terminal segments of these proteins were capable of sequence-specific binding to duplex telomeric plant DNA in vitro. DNA bending assays using the Arabidopsis TBPs revealed that AtTBP1 and AtTBP2 have DNA-bending abilities comparable to that of the human homologue hTRF1, and higher than those of AtTRP1 and AtTRP2.

Human Protection of Telomeres 1 (POT1) Is a Negative Regulator of Telomerase Activity In Vitro

The telomeric single-strand DNA binding protein protection of telomeres 1 (POT1) protects telomeres from rapid degradation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe and has been implicated in positive and negative telomere length regulation in humans. Human POT1 appears to interact with telomeres both through direct binding to the 3' overhanging G-strand DNA and through interaction with the TRF1 duplex telomere DNA binding complex. The influence of POT1 on telomerase activity has not been studied at the molecular level. We show here that POT1 negatively effects telomerase activity in vitro. We find that the DNA binding activity of POT1 is required for telomerase inhibition. Furthermore, POT1 is incapable of inhibiting telomeric repeat addition to substrate primers that are defective for POT1 binding, suggesting that in vivo, POT1 likely affects substrate access to telomerase.

Alternative splicing of Pot1 (Protection of telomere)-like genes in Arabidopsis thaliana

The Pot1 (Protection of telomere 1) is a G-rich single-stranded telomeric DNA binding protein, identified first in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, and shown to play an important role in stabilizing chromosomes. Pot1-like proteins or their encoding genes have been identified from yeasts to mammals. Based on the N-terminal amino acid sequences of fission yeast and human Pot1, two Pot1-like proteins (AtPOT1-1 and AtPOT1-2) have been identified in Arabidopsis thaliana, but neither of them has been characterized yet. In this study, we amplified their full-length cDNAs by RT-PCR and found three different variants for AtPOT1-1 and two for AtPOT1-2 genes, suggesting that they are exposed to alternative splicing. Alternative splicing also occurs in human Pot1, and only one out of five splicing variants had tissue specificity. However, no tissue specificity was found for any variants of the AtPOT1-1 and AtPOT1-2 genes among buds, flowers, leaves, roots, stems, siliques and cultured cells. Northern blot hybridization indicated that AtPOT1-1 expresses more in meristematic tissues than in vegetative tissues. By western blot analysis, we found that the antibody made against the N-terminal amino acids of AtPOT1-1 recognized three different polypeptides, indicating that all three variants are being translated in Arabidopsis.

Comparison between TRF2 and TRF1 of their telomeric DNA‐bound structures and DNA‐binding activities

Mammalian telomeres consist of long tandem arrays of double-stranded telomeric TTAGGG repeats packaged by the telomeric DNA-binding proteins TRF1 and TRF2. Both contain a similar C-terminal Myb domain that mediates sequence-specific binding to telomeric DNA. In a DNA complex of TRF1, only the single Myb-like domain consisting of three helices can bind specifically to double-stranded telomeric DNA. TRF2 also binds to double-stranded telomeric DNA. Although the DNA binding mode of TRF2 is likely identical to that of TRF1, TRF2 plays an important role in the t-loop formation that protects the ends of telomeres. Here, to clarify the details of the double-stranded telomeric DNA-binding modes of TRF1 and TRF2, we determined the solution structure of the DNA-binding domain of human TRF2 bound to telomeric DNA; it consists of three helices, and like TRF1, the third helix recognizes TAGGG sequence in the major groove of DNA with the N-terminal arm locating in the minor groove. However, small but significant differences are observed; in contrast to the minor groove recognition of TRF1, in which an arginine residue recognizes the TT sequence, a lysine residue of TRF2 interacts with the TT part. We examined the telomeric DNA-binding activities of both DNA-binding domains of TRF1 and TRF2 and found that TRF1 binds more strongly than TRF2. Based on the structural differences of both domains, we created several mutants of the DNA-binding domain of TRF2 with stronger binding activities compared to the wild-type TRF2.

Human Rif1 protein binds aberrant telomeres and aligns along anaphase midzone microtubules

We identified and characterized a human orthologue of Rif1 protein, which in budding yeast interacts in vivo with the major duplex telomeric DNA binding protein Rap1p and negatively regulates telomere length. Depletion of hRif1 by RNA interference in human cancer cells impaired cell growth but had no detectable effect on telomere length, although hRif1 overexpression in S. cerevisiae interfered with telomere length control, in a manner specifically dependent on the presence of yeast Rif1p. No localization of hRif1 on normal human telomeres, or interaction with the human telomeric proteins TRF1, TRF2, or hRap1, was detectable. However, hRif1 efficiently translocated to telomerically located DNA damage foci in response to the synthesis of aberrant telomeres directed by mutant-template telomerase RNA. The hRif1 level rose during late S/G2 but hRif1 was not visible on chromosomes in metaphase and anaphase; however, notably, specifically during early anaphase, hRif1 aligned along a subset of the midzone microtubules between the separating chromosomes. In telophase, hRif1 localized to chromosomes, and in interphase, it was intranuclear. These results define a novel subcellular localization behavior for hRif1 during the cell cycle.

Loss of hPot1 Function Leads to Telomere Instability and a cut-like Phenotype

The human telomere binding protein hPot1 binds to the most distal single-stranded extension of telomeric DNA in vitro, and probably in vivo, as well as associating with the double-stranded telomeric DNA binding proteins TRF1 and TRF2 through the bridging proteins PTOP (also known as PIP1 or TINT1) and TIN2. Disrupting either the DNA binding activity of hPot1 or its association with PTOP results in elongated telomeres, suggesting a role for hPot1 in telomere length regulation. However, mutations to POT1 and Cdc13p, the fission and budding yeast genes encoding the structural orthologs of this protein, leads to telomere instability and cell death. Thus, it is possible that the hPot1 protein may also serve to cap and protect telomeres in humans. Indeed, we now find that knocking down the expression of hPot1 in human cells causes apoptosis or senescence, as well as an increase in telomere associations and anaphase bridges, telltale signs of telomere instability. In addition, knockdown cells also displayed chromatin bridges between interphase cells, reminiscent of the cut phenotype that was first described in fission yeast and in which cytokinesis progresses despite a failure of chromatid separation. However, unlike the yeast cut phenotypes, we suggest that the cut-like phenotype observed in hPot1 knockdown cells is a consequence of the fusion of chromosome ends and that this fusion impedes proper chromosomal segregation. We conclude that hPot1 protects chromosome ends from illegitimate recombination, catastrophic chromosome instability, and abnormal chromosome segregation.

TIN2 Binds TRF1 and TRF2 Simultaneously and Stabilizes the TRF2 Complex on Telomeres

Human telomeres contain two related telomeric DNA-binding proteins, TRF1 and TRF2. The TRF1 complex contains the TRF1 interacting partner, TIN2, as well as PIP1 and POT1 and regulates telomere-length homeostasis. The TRF2 complex is primarily involved in telomere protection and contains the TRF2 interacting partner human (h)Rap1 as well as several factors involved in the DNA damage response. A prior report showed that conditional deletion of murine TRF1 reduced the presence of TRF2 on telomeres. Here we showed that TRF2 is also lost from human telomeres upon TRF1 depletion with small interfering RNA prompting a search for the connection between the TRF1 and TRF2 complexes. Using mass spectrometry and co-immunoprecipitation, we found that TRF1, TIN2, PIP1, and POT1 are associated with the TRF2-hRap1 complex. Gel filtration identified a TRF2 complex containing TIN2 and POT1 but not TRF1 indicating that TRF1 is not required for this interaction. Co-immunoprecipitation, Far-Western assays, and two-hybrid assays showed that TIN2, but not POT1 or PIP1, interacts directly with TRF2. Furthermore, TIN2 was found to bind TRF1 and TRF2 simultaneously, showing that TIN2 can link these telomeric proteins. This connection appeared to stabilize TRF2 on the telomeres as the treatment of cells with TIN2 small interfering RNA resulted in a decreased presence of TRF2 and hRap1 at chromosome ends. The TIN2-mediated cooperative binding of TRF1 and TRF2 to telomeres has important implications for the mechanism of telomere length regulation and protection.

A C-terminal Myb Extension Domain Defines a Novel Family of Double-strand Telomeric DNA-binding Proteins in Arabidopsis

Little is known about the protein composition of plant telomeres. We queried the Arabidopsis thaliana genome data base in search of genes with similarity to the human telomere proteins hTRF1 and hTRF2. hTRF1/hTRF2 are distinguished by the presence of a single Myb-like domain in their C terminus that is required for telomeric DNA binding in vitro. Twelve Arabidopsis genes fitting this criterion, dubbed TRF-like (TRFL), fell into two distinct gene families. Notably, TRFL family 1 possessed a highly conserved region C-terminal to the Myb domain called Myb-extension (Myb-ext) that is absent in TRFL family 2 and hTRF1/hTRF2. Immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that recombinant proteins from TRFL family 1, but not those from family 2, formed homodimers and heterodimers in vitro. DNA binding studies with isolated C-terminal fragments from TRFL family 1 proteins, but not family 2, showed specific binding to double-stranded plant telomeric DNA in vitro. Removal of the Myb-ext domain from TRFL1, a family 1 member, abolished DNA binding. However, when the Myb-ext domain was introduced into the corresponding region in TRFL3, a family 2 member, telomeric DNA binding was observed. Thus, Myb-ext is required for binding plant telomeric DNA and defines a novel class of proteins in Arabidopsis.

DNA polymerase beta interacts with TRF2 and induces telomere dysfunction in a murine mammary cell line.

DNA polymerase beta (Polbeta) is a DNA repair protein that functions in base excision repair and meiosis. The enzyme has deoxyribose phosphate lyase and polymerase activity, but it is error prone because it bears no proofreading activity. Errors in DNA repair can lead to the accumulation of mutations and consequently to tumorigenesis. Polbeta expression has been found to be higher in tumors, and deregulation of its expression has been found to induce chromosomal instability, a hallmark of tumorigenesis, but the underlying mechanisms are unclear. In the present study, we have investigated whether ectopic expression of Polbeta influences the stability of chromosomes in a murine mammary cell line. The results demonstrate a telomere dysfunction phenotype: an increased rate of telomere loss and chromosome fusion, suggesting that ectopic expression of Polbeta leads to telomere dysfunction. In addition, Polbeta interacts with TRF2, a telomeric DNA binding protein. Colocalization of the two proteins occurs at nontelomeric sites and appears to be influenced by the change in the status of the telomeric complex.

Characterization of Single Stranded Telomeric DNA-binding Proteins in Cultured Soybean (Glycine max) Cells

Characterization of Single Stranded Telomeric DNA-binding Proteins in Cultured Soybean (Glycine max) Cells

Dynamics of protein binding to telomeres in living cells: implications for telomere structure and function.

Telomeric proteins have an essential role in the regulation of the length of the telomeric DNA tract and in protection against end-to-end chromosome fusion. Telomere organization and how individual proteins are involved in different telomere functions in living cells is largely unknown. By using green fluorescent protein tagging and photobleaching, we investigated in vivo interactions of human telomeric DNA-binding proteins with telomeric DNA. Our results show that telomeric proteins interact with telomeres in a complex dynamic fashion: TRF2, which has a dual role in chromosome end protection and telomere length homeostasis, resides at telomeres in two distinct pools. One fraction ( approximately 73%) has binding dynamics similar to TRF1 (residence time of approximately 44 s). Interestingly, the other fraction of TRF2 binds with similar dynamics as the putative end-protecting factor hPOT1 (residence time of approximately 11 min). Our data support a dynamic model of telomeres in which chromosome end-protection and telomere length homeostasis are governed by differential binding of telomeric proteins to telomeric DNA.

Telomere-bound TRF1 and TRF2 stall the replication fork at telomeric repeats.

Vertebrate telomeres consist of tandem repeats of T2AG3 and associated proteins including the telomeric DNA-binding proteins, TRF1 and TRF2. It has been proposed that telomeres assume two interswitchable states, the open state that is accessible to various trans-acting factors and the closed state that excludes those factors. TRF1 and TRF2 are believed to promote the formation of the closed state. However, little is known about how those two states influence DNA replication. We analyzed the effects of TRF1 and TRF2 on telomeric replication both in vitro and in vivo. By exploiting the in vitro replication system of linear SV40 DNA, we found that telomeric repeats are a poor replication template. Moreover, the addition of recombinant TRF1 and TRF2 significantly stalled the replication fork progression at telomeric repeats. When TRF1 was overexpressed in HeLa cells, cells with 4N DNA content were accumulated. Furthermore, cytological analyses revealed that the replication focus overlapped with telomere signals at a significantly higher frequency in TRF1-overexpressing cells than in control cells. The results suggest that TRF1 and TRF2 exert inhibitory effects on replication fork progression.

Importance of TRF1 for Functional Telomere Structure

Telomeres are comprised of telomeric DNA sequences and associated binding molecules. Their structure functions to protect the ends of linear chromosomes and ensure chromosomal stability. One of the mammalian telomere-binding factors, TRF1, localizes telomeres by binding to double-stranded telomeric DNA arrays. Because the overexpression of wild-type and dominant-negative TRF1 induces progressive telomere shortening and elongation in human cells, respectively, a proposed major role of TRF1 is that of a negative regulator of telomere length. Here we report another crucial function of TRF1 in telomeres. In conditional mouse TRF1 null mutant embryonic stem cells, TRF1 deletion induced growth defect and chromosomal instability. Although no clear telomere shortening or elongation was observed in short term cultured TRF1-deficient cells, abnormal telomere signals were observed, and TRF1-interacting telomere-binding factor, TIN2, lost telomeric association. Furthermore, another double-stranded telomeric DNA-binding factor, TRF2, also showed decreased telomeric association. Importantly, end-to-end fusions with detectable telomere signals at fusion points accumulated in TRF1-deficient cells. These results strongly suggest that TRF1 interacts with other telomere-binding molecules and integrates into the functional telomere structure.

Identification of HMG-5 as a double-stranded telomeric DNA-binding protein in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans

Many protein components of telomeres, the multifunctional DNA–protein complexes at the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes, have been identified in diverse species ranging from yeast to humans. In Caenorhabditis elegans, CEH-37 has been identified by a yeast one hybrid screen to be a double-stranded telomere-binding protein. However, the role of CEH-37 in telomere function is unclear because a deletion mutation in this gene does not cause severe telomere defects. This observation raises the possibility of the presence of genetic redundancy. To identify additional double-stranded telomere-binding proteins in C. elegans, we used a different approach, namely, a proteomic approach. Affinity chromatography followed by Finnigan LCQ ion trap mass spectrometer analysis allowed us to identify several candidate proteins. We further characterized one of these, HMG-5, which is encoded by F45E4.9. HMG-5 bound to double-stranded telomere in vitro as shown by competition assays. At least two telomeric DNA repeats were needed for this binding. HMG-5 was expressed in the nuclei of the oocytes and all embryonic cells, but not in the hatched larvae or adults. HMG-5 mainly localized to the chromosomal ends, indicating that HMG-5 also binds to telomeres in vivo. These observations suggest that HMG-5 may participate, together with CEH-37, in early embryogenesis by acting at the telomeres.

A telomere-binding protein (TRF2/MTBP) from mouse nuclear matrix with motives of an intermediate filament-type rod domain.

In previous work, we identified a telomeric DNA-binding protein (termed telomere-membrane binding protein, MTBP) in the envelope of the frog oocyte nucleus and raised antibodies against it. Here we present immunological evidence which suggests strongly that MTBP is identical with the vertebrate telomeric DNA-binding protein TRF2 (telomere-repeat factor 2). MTBP/TRF2 possesses motif which resembles rod domain characteristic of intermediate filament (IF) proteins as shown by immunological cross-reactivity with characteristic antibodies, as well as amino acid sequence homology. Anti-MTBP antibodies recognised a protein of the same M, as TRF2 in extracts of mouse nuclei and nuclear matrix as shown by ion-exchange chromatography, gel shift assays, and Western blots. This mouse MTBP analogue forms more stable complexes with the vertebrate telomeric DNA fragment (T(2)AG(3))(135) than with the corresponding fragment from Tetrahymena (T(2)G(4))(130). Proteins in each of these complexes are recognised by anti-MTBP antibody. In situ hybridization with the vertebrate telomeric DNA sequence (T(2)AG(3))(135) and immunofluorescence with anti-MTBP antibody had shown earlier that these are co-localised in the nucleus of mouse cells, and here MTBP is shown to be associated with the residual membrane of hepatocyte nuclei using Western blotting and immunofluorescence. Some immunofluorescence signal from MTBP is localized at chromosome extremities on metaphase plates from mouse cell culture, but the main signal is seen in patches scattered around the chromosomes which were identified as remnants of the nuclear envelope by double labelling with antibodies against lamin B. These observations suggest that MTBP/TRF2 is a good candidate for the attachment of telomeres to the nuclear envelope in somatic cells.

POT1 as a terminal transducer of TRF1 telomere length control.

Human telomere maintenance is essential for the protection of chromosome ends, and changes in telomere length have been implicated in ageing and cancer. Human telomere length is regulated by the TTAGGG-repeat-binding protein TRF1 and its interacting partners tankyrase 1, TIN2 and PINX1 (refs 5-9). As the TRF1 complex binds to the duplex DNA of the telomere, it is unclear how it can affect telomerase, which acts on the single-stranded 3' telomeric overhang. Here we show that the TRF1 complex interacts with a single-stranded telomeric DNA-binding protein--protection of telomeres 1 (POT1)--and that human POT1 controls telomerase-mediated telomere elongation. The presence of POT1 on telomeres was diminished when the amount of single-stranded DNA was reduced. Furthermore, POT1 binding was regulated by the TRF1 complex in response to telomere length. A mutant form of POT1 lacking the DNA-binding domain abrogated TRF1-mediated control of telomere length, and induced rapid and extensive telomere elongation. We propose that the interaction between the TRF1 complex and POT1 affects the loading of POT1 on the single-stranded telomeric DNA, thus transmitting information about telomere length to the telomere terminus, where telomerase is regulated.

Human POT1 Facilitates Telomere Elongation by Telomerase

Mammalian telomeric DNA is mostly composed of double-stranded 5′-TTAGGG-3′ repeats and ends with a single-stranded 3′ overhang. Telomeric proteins stabilize the telomere by protecting the overhang from degradation [1, 2] or by remodeling the telomere into a T loop structure [3]. Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein that synthesizes new telomeric DNA [4, 5]. In budding yeast, other proteins, such as Cdc13p, that may help maintain the telomere end by regulating the recruitment or local activity of telomerase have been identified [6–9]. Pot1 is a single-stranded telomeric DNA binding protein first identified in fission yeast, where it was shown to protect telomeres from degradation [10]. Human POT1 (hPOT1) protein is known to bind specifically to the G-rich telomere strand [11]. We now show that hPOT1 can act as a telomerase-dependent, positive regulator of telomere length. Three splice variants of hPOT1 were overexpressed in a telomerase-positive human cell line. All three variants lengthened telomeres, and splice variant 1 was the most effective. hPOT1 was unable to lengthen the telomeres of telomerase-negative cells unless telomerase activity was induced. These data suggest that a normal function of hPOT1 is to facilitate telomere elongation by telomerase.

Telomeric DNA Ends Are Essential for the Localization of Ku at Telomeres in Fission Yeast

The Ku70-Ku80 heterodimer is a conserved protein complex essential for the non-homologous end-joining pathway. Ku proteins are also involved in telomere maintenance, although their precise roles remain to be elucidated. In fission yeast, pku70(+), the gene encoding the Ku70 homologue, has been reported. Here we report the identification and characterization of pku80(+), the gene encoding Ku80. Both pku70(+) and pku80(+) are essential for efficient non-homologous end-joining. We also found that the pku70 and pku80 mutants are sensitive to methyl methanesulfonate and hydroxyurea, suggesting their roles in the S phase. The pku80 mutant shows telomere shortening and tandem amplification of a subtelomeric sequence but no defects in the telomere position effect, as was previously reported for the pku70 mutant. By using the chromatin immunoprecipitation assay, we demonstrated that Pku70 and Pku80 physically interact with telomeric repeats and subtelomeric sequences. Interestingly, this telomere association of Pku proteins is independent of Taz1, a telomeric DNA-binding protein. We also showed that the Pku proteins do not associate with ectopically integrated telomeric repeats in the internal region of circular chromosomes. These results indicate that the physical end of DNA is necessary for the localization of Pku80 at telomeres.

Human Pot1 (protection of telomeres) protein: cytolocalization, gene structure, and alternative splicing.

Fission yeast Pot1 (protection of telomeres) is a single-stranded telomeric DNA binding protein with a critical role in ensuring chromosome stability. A putative human homolog (hPot1) was previously identified, based on moderate sequence similarity with fission yeast Pot1 and telomere end-binding proteins from ciliated protozoa. Using indirect immunofluorescence, we show here that epitope-tagged hPot1 localizes to telomeres in interphase nuclei of human cells, consistent with a direct role in telomere end protection. The hPOT1 gene contains 22 exons, most of which are present in all cDNAs examined. However, four exons are subject to exon skipping in some transcripts, giving rise to five splice variants. Four of these are ubiquitously expressed, whereas the fifth appears to be specific to leukocytes. The resultant proteins vary significantly in their ability to form complexes with single-stranded telomeric DNA as judged by electrophoretic mobility shift assays. In addition to these splice variants, the Pot1 family is expanded by the identification of six more genes from diverse species. Pot1-like proteins have now been found in plants, animals, yeasts, and microsporidia.

Distinct domains in the CArG-box binding factor A destabilize tetraplex forms of the fragile X expanded sequence d(CGG)n.

Formation of hairpin or tetraplex structures of the FMR1 gene d(CGG)n sequence triggers its expansion, setting off fragile X syndrome. In searching for proteins that destabilize d(CGG)n secondary structures we purified from rat liver quadruplex telomeric DNA binding protein 42 (qTBP42) that disrupts G'2 bimolecular tetraplex d(CGG)n while paradoxically stabilizing the G'2 structure of the telomeric sequence d(TTAGGG)n. Based on peptide sequence homology of qTBP42 and mouse CArG-box binding factor A (CBF-A), we provide direct evidence that recombinant CBF-A protein is physically and immunochemically indistinguishable from qTBP42 and that it too destabilizes G'2 d(CGG)n while stabilizing G'2 d(TTAGGG)n. We inquired whether CBF-A employs the same or different domains to differentially interact with G'2 d(CGG)n and G'2 d(TTAGGG)n. Mutant CBF-A proteins that lack each or combinations of its five conserved motifs: RNP1(1), RNP1(2), RNP2(1), RNP2(2) and ATP/GTP-binding box were tested for their G'2 d(CGG)n destabilization and G'2 d(TTAGGG)n stabilization activities. We find that either RNP1(1) or the ATP/GTP motifs are necessary and sufficient for G'2 d(CGG)n destabilization whereas RNP2(1) suppresses destabilization by either one of these two motifs. Neither RNP1(1) nor the ATP/GTP motif are required for G'2 d(TTAGGG)n stabilization. Hence, CBF-A employs different domains to destabilize G'2 d(CGG)n or stabilize G'2 d(TTAGGG)n.