This investigation was undertaken in order to find the dosage distribution within the tumor and surrounding tissues when a patient is treated by a partial rotation technic with a Co60 teletherapy machine. The published isodose curves and data (1–6) were not sufficiently extensive for our purposes, especially when the rotation was limited to an arc of 240°, the maximum traversed by the Picker C-3000 machine. Partial rotation is valuable in many problems of therapy; for example, treatment around the bladder, uterus, and rectum. Hence, it may be used on machines with which full rotation is possible. This study, therefore, includes 240° rotation for the 360° rotation Picker C-1000 machine. Method A sheet of du Pont Adlux film was placed between two elliptical sections–each 1 cm. thick–of a unit-density Masonite Presdwood phantom. The assembly was made light-tight by pasting black Scotch electrical tape over the edge of the boards. Films were exposed to 10 r, 25 r, 50 r, 100 r, 150 r, and 200 r. These, together with an unexposed film, were pan developed, fixed, and washed. The maximum density at the center of the exposed film was measured on a Photovolt transmission densitometer set for zero reading for the unexposed film density. Seven sets of films were exposed, developed, and measured similarly. Density-dosage curves were plotted. All seven curves had essentially the same shape but differed in slope due to variable temperature and time conditions of developing. At the point of greatest spread, the 200 r exposure, the greatest variation in density was 8 per cent. An average curve was plotted from these seven curves. This became the density-dose calibration curve (Fig. 1). Each section of the Presdwood phantom had a long axis of 29.5 cm. and a short axis of 23 cm. The boards containing the film were placed in the middle of the phantom with 11.5 cm. thickness of Presdwood on either side of the film. The boards making up the phantom were held together by small plastic pegs at the edge of the sections and sand bags at both ends. The phantom was placed on the table, lined up so that the plane of the film was in the plane of rotation and the center of rotation at the center of the phantom section containing the film. The set-up is shown in Figure 2. The exposed film, together with an unexposed portion of the same film, was developed and measured on the densitometer. The density was read at centimeter intervals along axes from the center of rotation, spaced 30° apart. By the use of the density-dose calibration curve the roentgen values were found. From these the per cent of maximum dose at all the measured points was calculated. Each family of curves involved about 750 determinations. Curves of per cent of maximum dose versus distance from the center of rotation for the different axes were plotted. Three separate films for each field size were exposed and worked up.