Telemedicine Program Research Articles

Abstract 4126950: Program Evaluation of a Team-Based Telemedicine Hypertension Intervention by Patients

Background: We pilot tested a 12-week, team-based, telemedicine hypertension management intervention tailored for patients with greater social needs. Our study included home blood pressure (BP) guided pharmacotherapy, frequent self-management support, and social support by pharmacists, nurses, community health workers and social workers. Twenty patients, including 17 Black patients, from 2 clinics in NC participated. We conducted program evaluation to inform future research. Methods: After program completion, we conducted semi-structured interviews and administered validated surveys for program evaluation. We used Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment and Health Equity Implementation Frameworks to guide our study design. We utilized inductive and deductive coding methods, with thematic analysis to organize emergent themes. We used descriptive statistics to summarize survey results. We triangulated themes from interviews with survey results during analysis/results interpretation using concurrent embedded mixed methods (Qual + quant) for convergence/complementarity. Results: Nineteen patients completed the interviews and 18 completed the surveys. A patient withdrew from the study. Several themes emerged around acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and patient centeredness about the program (Table). Patients’ perceptions that the program was acceptable and measuring BP at home was easy were most salient. Program was found to be highly patient centered. Conclusions: Patients found our team-based telemedicine intervention acceptable, appropriate, feasible, and patient centered. The tailored telemedicine program holds promise for adoption by patients with greater social needs.

Abstract 4128919: A Study Using Team Based Hypertension Care Focused on Black Patients to Inform a Future Randomized Trial

Background: Current telemedicine programs to manage hypertension are less effective in Black patients perhaps due to insufficient support for self-care skills and social needs. We describe a tailored program for Black patients emphasizing self-management support and social needs to inform future studies. Method: We piloted a 12-week telemedicine intervention comprising home blood pressure (BP) guided pharmacotherapy, frequent self-management support and social support using pharmacist, nurses, community health workers (CHW) and social workers (SW) among 20 patients in 2 clinics. At enrollment, we trained patients to use a BP monitor and a telemonitoring app that transmits BP real-time via a smartphone and provided a pill box to facilitate medication adherence. We asked patients to measure BP at least once daily and used 6 weeks average to guide pharmacotherapy. Trained nurses helped patients achieve self-care goals and provided 8-12 self-management support calls discussing hypertension, medication adherence, diet, physical activity, weight management, sleep, and BP measurement techniques. SWs and CHWs provided social support to address social needs such as food, transportation, and housing, and also offered home visits. Result: Eighteen patients completed the study of which 15 were Black, 2 White, and 1 Korean (9 were women). Mean age was 61.7 ± 11.8 years. Patients measured BP 10 ± 8.6 times/week and completed 8.3 ± 2.5 self-management calls. Over 12 weeks, SBP/DBP decreased by 16.5 ± 26.2/10.2 ± 18.5 mmHg without safety events (Table). There were 1.1 ± 0.8 (range 0-3) medication adjustments (dose or medication changes) per patient. Patients had 8 minor technical difficulties that were promptly resolved. 17 patients used pill boxes to improve medication adherence. Conclusion: Our tailored telemedicine program to manage hypertension is feasible among Black patients and offer valuable insights for future research.

Mobile health teleconsultation and telemedicine in operating outpatient departments during COVID-19 pandemic at a hospital in Eastern Nepal

ABSTRACT Background: Telemedicine provides a means to deliver healthcare across distances, enhancing efficiency and accessibility, especially in low- and middle-income countries. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted its importance by reducing the risk of virus transmission while maintaining healthcare delivery. This study evaluates the telemedicine program implemented at B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences (BPKIHS), Nepal, which provided specialist services to remote districts via teleconsultation during the 2020 lockdown. The objectives were to identify the number of patients, the major complaints, and the follow-up departments during teleconsultation. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on teleconsultation data from March 1 to August 31, 2020, across various outpatient departments at BPKIHS. Data from 10,901 patients were reviewed, with variables including age, gender, residence, and consultation medium. Descriptive statistics were calculated using SPSS (version 22). Results: Most of the patients (55.46%) were female, and the majority (30.84%) aged 21–30 years. Most consultations were from the Sunsari district (54.8%) and Koshi state (88.9%). Voice calls were the primary medium (39.62%), followed by WhatsApp video calls (30.08%). Obstetrics and gynecology had the highest consultation rate (16.15%), followed by dermatology (14.4%) and psychiatry (10.37%). Nearly half of the patients (45.0%) had follow-up consultations, primarily for dermatological issues (17.85%). Conclusion: The findings underscore telemedicine’s role in facilitating healthcare access, particularly for women and residents of remote areas, by reducing travel and exposure risks. This study highlights the need for further integration of telehealth technologies to enhance healthcare delivery, suggesting that teleconsultation can efficiently meet healthcare demands in resource-limited settings during and beyond pandemics.

A smartphone app for preschool wheezing and reliability of medical history collection

BackgroundThe use of mobile applications helps improving self-management in adolescents with asthma. However, no evidence is available for children with preschool wheezing. In addition, we have no data on the reliability of medical history collected at visits. The first aim was to assess the feasibility of a smartphone app in the management of preschool wheezing; secondly we aimed to evaluate the reliability of anamnestic data collected during face-to-face medical interviews.MethodsChildren with recurrent wheezing, age between 25 and 72 months, were randomly assigned to the intervention group, provided with a smartphone app for symptoms monitoring and asthma attack treatment, or to the control group, with a written action plan. At follow-up medical history was collected and the asthma control test and a clinical questionnaire were completed. App acceptability was also explored. Respiratory symptoms, medication and utilization of healthcare resources were collected. Plus, medical information obtained from the paper questionnaires was compared with data daily recorded by the app.ResultsWe enrolled 85 preschool children with recurrent wheezing: 43 assigned to the intervention and 42 to the control group. The average (SD) adherence to e-Diary compilation was 60 (15)%. The acceptance and usability of the intervention was favorable as 70% and 93% of participants in the intervention arm described the app as ‘’simple and intuitive’’ at Visit1 (after 3 months from enrollement) and Visit2 (3 months later than Visit1), respectively and 95% and 98% found it useful in symptoms management. There were no significant differences between the two groups in clinical outcomes. At Visit1, the cACT median score (IQR) was 23,5 (21–25) for the control group (42 patients) and 23 (21–24) for the intervention group (43 patients). At Visit2 (41 controls and 42 in the intervention group) it was 25 (24–25) and 24 (24–25), respectively. Secondary analysis of data from the intervention group showed higher incidence of daily symptoms recorded by the app in comparison with the paper questionnaire, suggesting that collection of retrospective medical history may not be completely reliable.ConclusionsThe smartphone app is usable and acceptable by families of preschool wheezers. Future controlled trial are needed to prove an impact on clinical outcomes or its efficacy in a telemedicine program. Finally a daily questionnaire could provide physicians with a more reliable clinical picture as reflected better daily asthma symptoms than the written retrospective questionnaire filled at clinical visit.

Enhancing palliative care for advanced cancer patients: evaluating implementation and impact of a virtual nurse-led symptom monitoring and telehealth initiative

BackgroundAs a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we implemented a novel nurse-led symptom monitoring and virtual telehealth program for patients with advanced cancer on palliative care.AimsTo evaluate the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance and acceptability of our program.MethodsThis was a prospective study carried out in a cohort of patients with advanced cancer over the period of 3rd June 2020 to 22nd October 2021. Demographic characteristics, cancer diagnosis, and functional status of patients were collected upon recruitment. Patients were asked to complete a patient-reported outcome measure (the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale, IPOS) prior to the first palliative care consult and subsequently every week for the duration of their participation in the program (12 weeks). The IPOS measures the severity of physical symptoms, emotional concerns, information, and financial needs. Participants’ utilization of healthcare services by participants 3 months before, during and 3 months after the telemedicine program was reviewed. At the end of the program, a client satisfaction questionnaire (CSQ-4) to survey participants’ experience with the telehealth program and their willingness to pay for this program was administered.ResultsReach: The recruitment to adoption ratio of the program was 0.71. Acceptability:: Participants expressed satisfactory experience. Effectiveness: We noted that the severity of patients’ symptoms and number of emergency department visits decreased over time with nurse support. Adoption: we received referrals from 23 oncologists, yielding an adoption rate of 70%. Implementation: Of the 99 patients recruited for the program, 88.9% of them managed to complete their initial video consults as planned. 16% of them failed to complete the program due to factors such as patient demising. Maintenance: The declining rate of IPOS completion throughout the study period (98.9% at week 1 to 60.8% at week 12) demonstrated the difficulties in sustaining regular administration of self-reported patient outcome measures.ConclusionThe telemedicine program was effective and acceptable. We noted challenges in sustaining the administration of patient reported outcome measures over time. Further studies on how we can improve the sustainability of symptom monitoring in a telehealth program for patients with advanced illnesses, under palliative care, should be conducted.

Pandemic Action Plan: Phase 3-Lessons Learned from Implementation. "What Did We Learn?"

The COVID-19 pandemic created critical challenges for hospitals and health care providers. Suddenly clinics were forced to close; elective procedures were delayed; scheduled visits were canceled; emergency rooms were overcrowded; hospital beds, equipment, and personal protective equipment (PPE) were in short supply; and staff were faced with rapidly changing circumstances, care protocols, trauma, and personal risk. To better address challenges of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and prepare for future pandemics, the National Telemedicine Technology Assessment Resource Center (TTAC) was asked to develop a Pandemic Response Action Plan that would allow its users to address critical issues with available telemedicine and related technologies. The project was constructed in 3 phases. Phase 1-Develop a Pandemic Response Action Plan and a Pandemic Response Action Plan Policy and Regulatory Summary, which identifies the regulatory challenges as well as policy recommendations. Phase 2-Publish the Action Plan and the Policy and Regulatory Summary. Phase 3-Look at health care providers who used the approaches, tools, and technology in the Pandemic Action Plan and document the results. This document represents Phase 3. This document is Phase 3. In this report we look back at health care providers who used the approaches in the Phase 1 Pandemic Response Action Plan as published in Phase 2. In this document we report on the challenges and results of implementing parts of the Pandemic Action Plan. It records the findings, conclusions, and recommendations resulting from the experience of health care providers and the professional experiences of the team and their organizations in implementing parts or all of the plan. Methods: The same multidisciplinary team that constructed Phase 1 and Phase 2 were engaged to develop this Phase 3 report. The members of the team represent leadership expertise and key stakeholders in health care delivery during a pandemic (administration, infection control, physicians, nurses, public health, contingency planning, disaster response, and information technology) as well as a facilitator. For Phase 3, the group used structured brainstorming to define the findings, issues, and results of their own organizations' digital health response to the pandemic. In addition, eight health care providers (hospitals) identified by the Telemedicine Resource Centers' (TRCs) organizations, who used the Pandemic response Plan (created in Phases 1 and 2), were interviewed. All interviews were conducted by the same facilitator with leaders (CEO, and leaders of the telemedicine programs) in each of the eight programs, using a standard questionnaire created by the team. Current literature references are included in this report to illustrate when findings are known to have broader applicability. Conclusions: The impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic was severe and identified multiple critical challenges and weaknesses. Applying the approaches, tools, and technology outlined in the Pandemic Response Action Plan proved to be effective in addressing critical provider challenges. However, implementing these tools during a crisis was difficult unless the organization had experience with the tools and necessary workflows in advance. Implementing these tools as part of standard workflows and everyday operations increased the capabilities and resilience of these organizations in the provision of care during this and for future pandemics.

Physical Activity in Cancer Rehabilitation and Technology Acceptance: Results From the "Oncology in Motion" Project.

The international literature underlines that physical activity has a role in preventing cancer and is beneficial for cancer recovery and rehabilitation. Therefore, patient education is essential to stimulate training. Telemedicine and e-health tools like apps and wearables can support patients' education and the monitoring of their health condition and progress. The article reports the results of the Oncology in Motion telemedicine program of the National Cancer Institute of Aviano, Italy, to provide breast cancer patients with a personalized fitness path and telemonitoring. 144 women took part in the program. Low adherence was recorded, performing the customized training schedule and, for those women sticking to the plan, using the technological devices and submitting the training data to the Institute. Low technology acceptance and literacy, laziness, and lack of collaboration between cancer centers stood among the causes of low adherence, calling for more comprehensive and effective educational programs and support to stimulate physical activity and the use of new devices to get personalized counseling and contribute to the creation of knowledge.

Is Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats Analysis Effective in Preventing and Controlling Coronavirus Disease-19? A qualitative study

Background: Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) management requires continuous monitoring and evaluation based on various methods and models. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis in preventing and controlling the COVID-19. Methods: This study was conducted using directed qualitative content analysis. A total of 15 participants, including 9 patients with COVID-19, a physician, a pharmacist, the head of the department of infectious diseases, a hospital manager, a nurse, and the head of a health center were selected through purposive sampling from May to July 2020. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews, each lasting 45 to 60 minutes and analyzed using Graneheim and Lundman’s qualitative content analysis method. Results: The analysis of the data revealed four main categories including the strengths (use of various media, supporting ideals), weaknesses) low understanding of disease risk, lack of vaccines, lack of appropriate tele-education and tele-medicine programs, infrastructural constraints), opportunities (people’s participation, family support, compliance with regulations), and threats (sanctions and poor control, the conflict between doubt and certainty, hidden layers of the disease, corona and social stigma). The internal and external analysis was determined as the main theme. Conclusion: The results suggest that it is necessary to make optimal use of the strengths and opportunities of the COVID-19 crisis and to develop participation and empathy among people in addition to complying with laws and making appropriate use of educational media. In this regard, the strengthening of tele-education infrastructure and transparency in presenting reports and methods for the prevention and control of the COVID-19 can be effective.

Associations Between Telemedicine Use Barriers, Organizational Factors, and Physician Perceptions of Care Quality.

Introduction: Evaluating physician perceptions of telemedicine use and its impact on care quality among physician providers is critical to sustaining telemedicine programs, given the uncertainty of reimbursement policy, preferences, inadequate training, and technical difficulties. Physicians reported technical barriers to effectively practicing integrated medicine using telemedicine as patient volumes increased during the pandemic. The objective of this work was to examine whether perceived practice barriers and facilitators were associated with physician respondents' perceptions of telemedicine care quality compared with in-person care. Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed the 2021 National Electronic Health Record Survey. The sample comprised 1,857 nonfederally employed physicians (weighted n = 403,013) delivering integrated patient care. Of those physicians, 1,630 (weighted n = 346,646) reported providing care through telemedicine. We reported frequencies and percentages of reported practice characteristics. Generalized ordinal logistic regressions examined relationships between practice factors and care quality for telemedicine care. Results: Most of the sample (n = 1,630) were male (66.1%), >50 years of age (66.1%), and worked in a single location (73.5%). A total of 70% of respondents reported that patients had difficulty using telemedicine platforms, and 64% reported limitations in patients' access to technology. Most respondents indicated having provided quality care to some extent (45%) and to a great extent (26%) during telemedicine visits compared to in-person visits. Associations between barriers, facilitators, and care quality perceptions were positive, underscoring resiliency in telemedicine programs among practices. Conclusion: Care modalities and the organizational, environmental, and personal facilitators drive quality perceptions among physicians. Perceived fit and usability determine perceptions of care quality for providers integrating telemedicine into their practice.

A Retrospective Secondary Data Analysis of Telemedicine Service Utilization (2020-2023) Among Patients Covered By The Universal Coverage Scheme in Thailand.

Objective: The National Health Security Office in Thailand introduced a telemedicine program called "Telehealth/Telemedicine" in December 2020, which aimed to reimburse telemedicine services for patients with stable chronic diseases under the Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS). The current study investigated patient characteristics and trends in telemedicine service utilization under the UCS in Thailand and examined the impact of COVID-19 outbreaks on telemedicine services. Methods: A retrospective secondary data analysis using e-claim data from December 1, 2020, to April 18, 2023, was conducted. The analytical methods included descriptive analysis and an interrupted time series analysis. Results: During ∼29 months, 110,153 unique patients used telemedicine services, leading to a total of 259,047 visits. The average age was 54 years, and most of patients were female (57%). Hypertension was the most common diagnosis for patients receiving telemedicine services. Patients with mental health conditions often engaged in telemedicine consultation with drug delivery. During the Delta and Omicron outbreaks, telemedicine service utilization significantly increased compared with that in any nonpandemic periods within the 29-month timeframe (odds ratio [OR]: 3.85, p-value <0.01; OR: 2.55, p-value <0.01). Conclusions: The study findings highlight the initial trend of telemedicine services in Thailand from the start of the COVID-19 pandemic to the beginning of the post-COVID-19 period. As telemedicine will play a critical role in the future of health care, this information can support the scale-up of telemedicine, including monitoring and evaluation plans, to help improve the efficiency of the system.

Telemedical Direction to Optimize Resource Utilization in a Rural Emergency Medical Services System.

Telemedicine remains an underused tool in rural emergency medical servces (EMS) systems. Rural emergency medical technicians (EMT) and paramedics cite concerns that telemedicine could increase Advanced Life Support (ALS) transports, extend on-scene times, and face challenges related to connectivity as barriers to implementation. Our aim in this project was to implement a telemedicine system in a rural EMS setting and assess the impact of telemedicine on EMS management of patients with chest pain while evaluating some of the perceived barriers. This study was a mixed-methods, retrospective review of quality assurance data collected prior to and after implementation of a telemedicine program targeting patients with chest pain. We compared quantitative data from the 12-month pre-implementation phase to data from 15 months post-implementation. Patients were included if they had a chief complaint of chest pain or a 12-lead electrocardiogram had been obtained. The primary outcome was the rate of ALS transport before and after program implementation. Secondary outcomes included EMS call response times and EMS agency performance on quality improvement benchmarks. Qualitative data were also collected after each telemedicine encounter to evaluate paramedic/EMT and EMS physician perception of call quality. The telemedicine pilot project was implemented in September 2020. Overall, there were 58 successful encounters. For this analysis, we included 38 patients in both the pre-implementation period (September 9, 2019-September 10, 2020) and the post-implementation period (September 11, 2020-December 5, 2021). Among this population, the ALS transport rate was 42% before and 45% after implementation (odds ratio 1.11; 95% confidence interval 0.45-2.76). The EMS median out-of-service times were 47 minutes before, and 33 minutes after (P = 0.07). Overall, 64% of paramedics/EMTs and 89% of EMS physicians rated the telemedicine call quality as "good." In this rural EMS system, a telehealth platform was successfully used to connect paramedics/EMTs to board-certified EMS physicians over a 15-month period. Telemedicine use did not alter rates of ALS transports and did not increase on-scene time. The majority of paramedics/EMTs and EMS physicians rated the quality of the telemedicine connection as "good."

A Screening Strategy to Mitigate Vision Impairment by Engaging Adults Who Underuse Eye Care Services

Underuse of eye care services leads to underdiagnosed and undertreated eye disease. To assess the reasons for underuse of eye care and whether a novel, free eye disease screening program is engaging adults who are both at high risk of eye disease and were underusing eye care services. In a population-based cross-sectional study, adult participants from the first year of the Michigan Screening and Intervention for Glaucoma and Eye Health Through Telemedicine (MI-SIGHT) Program were included. The participants were recruited from primary care clinics serving 2 low-income communities. Recruitment occurred between June 28, 2020 and June 27, 2021 at the free clinic, and between January 27, 2021 and January 26, 2022 at a federally qualified health clinic. Data were analyzed from December 7, 2022, to May 29, 2024. Participants received comprehensive eye disease screening and completed surveys assessing health and prior eye care use. Risk factors for eye disease included age 65 years and older, diabetes, personal or family history of eye disease, and self-identifying as Black or African American individuals who were aged 50 years or older. Underuse of eye care was defined as no eye examination in 2 or more years. Percentage of participants who were at high risk of eye disease and underused eye care services before accessing this program. A total of 1171 MI-SIGHT participants were a mean (SD) age of 55 (14.5) years; 437 (38%) identified as male; 591 (54%) self-identified as Black or African American, 101 (10%) as Hispanic or Latino, and 371 (34%) as White; 492 (43%) had high school education or less, and 696 (70%) reported an annual household income of less than $30 000. Characteristics of participants reporting not having had an eye examination in 2 years or more included 23% (n = 151) of participants 65 years and over, 33% (n = 214) of participants who self-reported diabetes, 25% (n = 130) of participants reporting a family history of glaucoma, 3% (n = 14) of those with self-reported glaucoma; and 33% (n = 202) of Black or African-American participants aged 50 years and older. In participants who reported not having had an eye examination in 2 or more years, 21% (n = 137) screened positive for glaucoma, 20% (n = 129) for cataract, 6% (n = 38) for diabetic retinopathy, and 1% (n = 9) for age-related macular degeneration. Reported reasons for why participants had not had an eye examination included no insurance (175 of 627 [28%]), no reason to go (no problem) (135 of 627 [22%]), and cost of eye examination (101 of 627 [16%]). The findings of this study suggest that placing eye disease detection programs in primary care clinics in underserved areas may improve eye disease detection and treatment, possibly mitigating needless vision loss in the US.

Experience of caregivers and healthcare professionals using a telemedicine programme in a paediatric palliative care unit.

Telemedicine is a means of providing efficient treatment for children with complex chronic conditions and/or subsidiary palliative paediatric care. To evaluate how satisfied families and healthcare professionals are with a telemedicine programme. This is a qualitative study of narrative design. Ten interviews were conducted with family members and professionals who had been using telemedicine for a year. Sampling was intentional and a discourse and content analysis was conducted. Six thematic categories emerged from the analysis of the interviews: degree of satisfaction; usefulness; benefits according to patient needs and attention; technical and human difficulties; and implantation of the system and proposals for improvement. The study shows that telemedicine is a very useful complementary tool for healthcare professionals in a palliative care context. It is necessary to take into account the perception and needs of both families and healthcare professionals with regard to this tool since it can improve patient care.

Advancing ocular oncology care through teleophthalmology: a patient-centric perspective

ObjectiveAssessing patient satisfaction is an important component of understanding a program's efficacy and quality. The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient satisfaction with a teleophthalmology program tailored for ocular oncology that provides screening, remote assessment, care planning, and follow-up. Study designRetrospective survey. MethodsAn adapted version of the Telehealth Satisfaction Scale, consisting of the 8 questions plus 5 additional questions specific to the teleophthalmology program, was used to survey patients. The teleophthalmology program involves diagnostic imaging, remote physician assessments, and follow-up phone calls from health care team members to deliver results to patients. For reporting, the Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies was used. T-tests explored satisfaction differences across demographics and teleophthalmology visits. ResultsAmong the 95 patients contacted, 91 agreed to participate in the survey (96% response rate). Participants exhibited high overall satisfaction with the teleophthalmology program, reflected in a mean Telehealth Satisfaction Scale score of 28.88 (SD = 3.35 of 32). The median number of teleophthalmology visits completed was 4.0 (range of 1–8 appointments). No significant differences in satisfaction were found on the basis of age (P = 0.56), urban or rural residence (P = 0.17), or the number of telemedicine appointments (P = 0.51). ConclusionsThis analysis displays high satisfaction levels among patients within an ocular oncology clinic participating in the current telemedicine program, irrespective of age, geography, or number of teleophthalmology visits. Participants reported having their health care needs met with minimal clinical encounters due to remote consultations and telephone communications.

Neighborhood Poverty and Clinic Attendance in the Michigan Screening and Intervention for Glaucoma and Eye Health through Telemedicine Program.

Higher neighborhood-level poverty is associated with greater odds of missing a free eye disease screening appointment, underscoring the importance of community-based interventions to address upstream social determinants of health. To investigate the association between neighborhood-level characteristics and attendance for a free eye disease screening. The MI-SIGHT program is conducted in two community clinics in Southeastern Michigan. Participant-level demographics were extracted from electronic health records. Neighborhood level-characteristics including Area Deprivation Index (ADI), median household income (HHI), percent of households with >30% rent burden, percent of households without vehicles, percent of households in subsidized housing, and energy burden were obtained from the Wisconsin Neighborhood Atlas and the United States census. Logistic regression was used to model the probability of clinic visit attendance, which was the main outcome measure. 1431 participants were scheduled for screening appointments between July 2020 to November 2021, with a no-show rate of 23%. Individuals lived an average of 7.7 miles from each clinic (SD=8.1) and in neighborhoods with a mean ADI of 6.8 (SD=3.2, 1-10 scale where 10 is the most deprived). After adjusting for age, sex, race, and ethnicity, participants from neighborhoods with higher deprivation were more likely to have missed clinic visits. For example, there was an 8% higher odds of missed clinic visits for every 1-point increase in ADI (odds ratio, OR=1.08, P=0.020) and an 18% higher odds of a missed visit with every 10% increase in households without a vehicle (OR=1.18, P=0.013). Higher neighborhood-level poverty was associated with greater odds of missing a free eye disease screening appointment after adjusting for individual characteristics. Increased neighborhood-level resources are likely needed to bolster engagement in preventive eye care.

Comparison of Glaucoma Diagnosis by Telemedicine, In-Person Ophthalmologist, and Optometrist.

Diagnosis of glaucoma through telemedicine demonstrates moderate agreement with in-person ophthalmologist (MD) and in-person optometrist (OD) diagnosis, providing evidence that telemedicine is a timely, accurate screening method in settings where an in-person visit may not be feasible. To compare diagnostic agreement of glaucoma between in-person MD, in-person OD, and a simulated telemedicine program. A cross-sectional study of patients with normal optic nerve structural and functional imaging and new patients referred for glaucoma evaluation examined in-person by an MD for glaucoma with a dilated examination and structural and functional optic nerve testing (optical coherence tomography, photos, and visual field); examined in person by an OD with a dilated examination and optic nerve testing; and structural and functional optic nerve testing reviewed separately by 2 ophthalmologists [telemedicine ophthalmologist reviewer 1 (TMD1), telemedicine ophthalmologist reviewer 2 (TMD2)] with masking of prior MD and OD diagnoses. Interrater agreement between each diagnostic method (MD, OD, TMD1, and TMD2) of normal versus disease (open angle glaucoma, normal tension glaucoma, other types of glaucoma, other optic nerve disorders, ocular hypertension, and glaucoma suspect) for each eye was calculated (Cohen unweighted kappa). A total of 100 patients with a median age of 66 years (interquartile range: 59-72), male (40%) and white (62%) were analyzed. There was moderate agreement between MD and telemedicine [TMD1 kappa 0.49 (95% CI: 0.37-0.61), TMD2 kappa 0.44 (95% CI: 0.32-0.56)] and between MD and OD diagnosis [0.41 (95% CI: 0.28-0.54)] and fair-moderate agreement between OD and telemedicine [TMD1: 0.46 (95% CI: 0.34-0.58), TMD2: 0.61 (95% CI: 0.50-0.72)]. The simulated telemedicine approach had comparable levels of agreement in glaucoma diagnosis with in-person fellowship-trained ophthalmologists, presenting a crucial complementary role in screening and increasing access to care, particularly in rural or underserved settings.

Flatform Konseling Virtual ; Wujud Trasformasi Edukasi Terapeutik di Fasilitas Pelayanan Kesehatan

Virtual counseling platforms provide the ability to maintain connectivity between healthcare providers and their patients. Patients can quickly receive diagnoses, enabling faster and more accurate responses to any changes in their health. This article explains the implementation and therapeutic education phases in healthcare facilities, particularly hospitals and community health centers, using virtual counseling platforms in telemedicine programs through a literature review and a descriptive approach. The policy for the therapeutic education process in virtual counseling platforms in healthcare facilities is divided into eight stages: assessing educational needs, medical record-keeping, disease diagnosis, medical equipment safety, pain management, diet and nutrition, rehabilitation techniques, and verification of understanding received. There are five therapeutic education topics: patient-oriented, disease-oriented, patient safety-oriented, rehabilitation material, and prevention material. In the virtual counseling platform, healthcare providers implement seventeen implementation actions in the therapeutic education process based on the educational phases. First, in the Pre-Interaction Phase, the implementation actions include self-evaluation, setting the stages of virtual counseling therapeutic education, and creating a written plan according to established SOPs. Second, in the Orientation Phase, implementation actions include introducing oneself, scheduling meetings (contracting), building rapport and trust, initiating a conversation, and closing the introduction session. Third, in the Working Phase, implementation actions involve increasing the patients' understanding and awareness of themselves, developing independence competencies, therapeutic actions, conducting health education, collaboration, delegation, and observation. Fourth, in the Termination Phase, implementation actions include making temporary terminations, final terminations with evaluation of actions, and contracting for follow-up care and treatment outcomes.

Comparison of 30-day retention in treatment among patients referred to opioid use disorder treatment from emergency department and telemedicine settings

IntroductionTelemedicine is a feasible alternative to in-person evaluations for people with opioid use disorder (OUD). The literature on medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) telemedicine has focused on ongoing OUD treatment. Emergency department (ED) visits are an opportunity to initiate MOUD; however, little is known regarding the outcomes of patients following telemedicine referrals for MOUD from emergency settings. The current study describes rates of initial outpatient clinic appointment attendance and 30-day retention in care among patients referred by telemedicine compared to ED referrals. MethodsThis paper reports a retrospective review of data for patients referred from EDs or telemedicine through the Medication for Addiction Treatment and Electronic Referrals (MATTERS) Network. The MATTERS online platform collects data on patient demographic information (e.g., age, gender, race/ethnicity, and insurance type), reason for visit, prior medical and mental health history, prior OUD treatment history, and past 30-day substance use behaviors. Analyses compared initial visit attendance and 30-day retention among the patients for whom follow-up data were received from clinics by demographic and initial treatment factors. ResultsBetween October 2020 and September 2022, the MATTERS Network made 1349 referrals; 39.7 % originated from an ED and 47.8 % originated from telemedicine. For patients with available data, those referred from telemedicine were 1.64 times more likely to attend their initial clinic appointment and 2.59 times more likely be engaged in treatment at 30 days compared to those referred from an ED. More than two-thirds of patients referred from the emergency telemedicine environment followed up at their first clinic visit and more than half of these patients were still retained in treatment 30 days after referral. ConclusionsThe rates of initial clinic visit and 30-day retention when referred following a telemedicine evaluation are encouraging. Further development of telemedicine programs that offer evaluations, access to medications, and referrals to treatment should be considered.

Improving Diabetic Care Through Education and Innovation.

Background: Despite the innovative advancements in diabetes care, providers may not recognize patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who qualify for a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device or the benefits of a telemedicine program for improving self-management behaviors. Objective: This quality improvement (QI) project aimed to determine if an advanced practice registered nurse (APRN)-led telemedicine program using CGM could improve glycemic control and self-management in patients with insulin-dependent T2DM. Methods: A 6-week telemedicine program was developed and implemented using the CGM's time-in-range to deliver patient-specific education. Clinical metrics were collected at each visit. All patients completed a pre- and postintervention Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire-Revised (DSMQ-R) survey. Results: A repeated measures analysis of variance revealed that the telemedicine program had a statistically significant impact on time-in-range outcomes, F(2, 14) = 18.203, p < .001. Paired-samples t tests indicate that APRN-led education improved body mass index, t(8) = 4.232, p = .002; decreased systolic blood pressure, t(8) = 2.90, p = .010, and diastolic blood pressure, t(8) = 3.21, p = .007; and increased self-management skills as evidenced by DSMQ-R, t(8) = -5.498, p < .001. Conclusions: This QI project highlights multiple interventions for improving diabetes management in a primary care facility. Implications for Nursing: An APRN-led telemedicine program integrating CGM time-in-range data can improve glycemic control and self-management skills in patients with T2DM who administer insulin.

Disability and functional status among patients post Covid 19 - A tertiary care hospital based prospective study

BackgroundThe long-term sequelae of COVID-19 infection, the persistence of disability, its temporal profile, and associated factors remain under-documented in South India. ObjectivesTo estimate the proportion of disability in survivors of COVID-19 at different time points (first, second, and sixth months) and determine the demographic and clinical variables associated with poor functional status which will aid in developing effective treatment and rehabilitation strategies. MethodsA total of 139 COVID-19 patients were interviewed at discharge from a tertiary care hospital and followed up in the first, second, and sixth months. Persistent symptoms and post-COVID functional status (PCFS) scores were recorded at all these time points. Univariate and Multivariate Poisson regression analysis was used to determine the association of socio-demographic variables and other clinical factors with functional status post-COVID-19. Results48.92 % of patients had complete recovery. However, a majority (51.08 %) experienced persistent functional limitation - 33.81 % had negligible, 15.83 % mild, 0.72 % moderate, and 0.72 % severe limitation. Common symptoms at six months were breathlessness (23.02 %), fatigue (20.14 %), memory loss (10.07 %), myalgia (8.63 %), and post-traumatic stress disorder (7.91 %). Vaccination emerged as a significant predictor of disability status (p < 0.05). Taking two vaccine doses lowered the risk of disability by 0.48 times. ConclusionAt the six-month follow-up of discharged COVID-19 patients, they continue to exhibit persistent functional limitations and symptoms. Administration of two vaccine doses is recommended to improve functional status at six months. Multidisciplinary clinics, telemedicine, and community-based rehabilitation programs are essential to minimize post-COVID-19 functional disability and facilitate complete recovery.