The difficulties which arise in the course of a study of the oscillations of Pleistocene shore-lines are well known (see Daly 1934, Wright 1937). Epeirogenic movements and tectonic dislocations and flexures on the one hand, and eustatic and isostatic oscillations, which are more directly connected with glacial and interglacial periods, on the other, have affected the positions of Pleistocene shore-lines around all oceans. Each littoral region has reacted differently to these factors, according to the character of its structure, the degree of its tectonic stability, and its geographical position in relation to the inlandeis . Even the traces of eustatic oscillations of sea-level, which, undisturbed, would show a constant elevation on all littoral regions, are actually found at different heights above the present sea-level, because tectonic and isostatic movements have interfered with their formation and sometimes altered their original position. In the Mediterranean, the shores of which have not undergone isostatic movements comparable with those of northern Europe, the Pleistocene shore-lines can be traced at levels which appear to have been determined by local eustatic and tectonic oscillations. Issel, Gignoux, de Lamothe, Depéret, and others have pointed out the approximate constancy, right round the Mediterranean, of the levels of some of these shore-lines. Depéret has even correlated them with the Atlantic shore-lines of western Europe. Some of these investigations have been based only on morphological evidence and altimetry; in others, these methods have been supplemented by palaeontological and stratigraphical research. Only the latter class can furnish a reliable basis for the
Read full abstract