Technology Advisory Council Research Articles

프랑스의 공중보건 위기대응과 위원회의 역할

Needs for effective and prompt actions in public administration of contemporary nations call for almost inevitably diversified and specialized managements in the form of committee system. It is frequently employed by many nations, more prominently in the field of science and technology. Second half of the 20th century saw to it that science drove the flow of the national economy, culminating in intensive developments including international standardization in various fields. Above all, the constitutional basis for this was established finally. and the National Science and Technology Advisory Council Act was enacted in 1991 to provide advice on innovation in science and technology. With the institutional framework on this matter being established, for instance, in the event of infectious diseases such as the coronavirus comes infectious, expert scientific opinion is required mandatory prior to the government's policy formulation and execution. By now the ptactice is solid, and the advices and technical opinions in almost all cases are formed by way of committees. In France, in order to maintain public health in general and respond to crises such as the recent pandemic like Corvid-19, the Ministry of Health is responsible for healthcare policy formulation, execution of it, and let alone research and development. The last part, R&D is shared by an independent administrative agency, the Higher Health Agency, along with various technical institutes and networks of healthcare professionals. In particular in view of the gravity of the Corvid-19 problem the government established a temporary organization on top of the 120-year-old Higher Committee on Public Health and the National Ethics Advisory Committee, which deals with ethical issues and other existing committees. These organizations seek and strive for transparency and fairness in their activities through committee composition, disclosure of committee activities, oaths of professional ethics of members, and ensuring citizen participation.

Maximize Event Outreach With a Technology Advisory Council

Maximize Event Outreach With a Technology Advisory Council

Advance Mission With a Technology Advisory Council

Advance Mission With a Technology Advisory Council

Maximize Event Outreach With a Technology Advisory Council

The Membership Management ReportVolume 16, Issue 1 p. 3-3 Reach New Audiences Maximize Event Outreach With a Technology Advisory Council First published: 09 December 2019 https://doi.org/10.1002/mmr.31372Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Volume16, Issue1January 2020Pages 3-3 RelatedInformation

Trump restarts science and technology advisory council

Trump restarts science and technology advisory council

Maximize Event Outreach With a Technology Advisory Council

Special Events GaloreVolume 18, Issue 6 p. 2-2 Reach New Audiences Maximize Event Outreach With a Technology Advisory Council First published: 15 May 2018 https://doi.org/10.1002/speg.30841Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Volume18, Issue6June 2018Pages 2-2 RelatedInformation

Stress Response and Natural Transformation in Vibrio cholerae

Antimicrobial resistance is a major threat facing modern medicine, which is accelerated by various forms of horizontal gene transfer (HGT). A contributing problem is that antibiotics themselves, especially those inducing DNA damage and the SOS response, can actually increase the rates of transfer of resistance genes through conjugation and transduction. Evidence from other species indicates that DNA‐damaging stress may also have effects on natural transformation, a form of HGT in which extracellular DNA is promiscuously taken up and recombined into the genome and which may contribute to the spread of resistance genes. We are studying the effects of DNA‐damaging stress in Vibrio cholerae, an important human pathogen capable of both natural transformation and the SOS response. Here, we demonstrate that genotoxic agents can alter the rates of natural transformation in V. cholerae and explore the mechanisms by which these changes occur.Support or Funding Information“Monitoring the Impact of Climate Change Stressors on Horizontal Gene Transfer in Marine Microbial Populations.” 2016. Rhode Island Research Alliance Collaborative Research Grant, Rhode Island Science and Technology Advisory Council (STAC).Brown University Presidential Fellowship

Maximize Event Outreach With a Technology Advisory Council

Special Events GaloreVolume 17, Issue 2 p. 6-6 Reach New Audiences Maximize Event Outreach With a Technology Advisory Council First published: 16 January 2017 https://doi.org/10.1002/speg.30512Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Volume17, Issue2February 2017Pages 6-6 RelatedInformation

Maximize Event Outreach With a Technology Advisory Council

Maximize Event Outreach With a Technology Advisory Council

The impact of information technology on managed care pharmacy: today and tomorrow.

Understanding the use of health information technology (HIT) and its implications is crucial for the future of managed care pharmacy. Information is the cornerstone of providing and managing care, and the ability to exchange data is easier and more complicated than ever before. In this commentary, a subset of the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Healthcare Information Technology Advisory Council addresses how HIT supports managed care today and its anticipated evolution, with a focus on quality, patient safety, communication, and efficiency. Among the tools and functions reviewed are electronic health records, electronic prescribing, health information exchange, electronic prior authorization, pharmacists as care team members, formularies, prescription drug abuse, and policy levers to address these issues.

Sallie Ann Watkins

Sallie Ann Watkins

Science Advice in the States

In 2006 this column posed the question, “Where are all the state science advisers?” With states challenged to make more decisions about investments in research, science education, and tech-based industry, author Gillian Andres asked, Who is advising the governors? She found that few US states had science advisers within the governor’s office. An informal survey conducted by the AIBS Public Policy Office in July 2006 found that just six states (Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Virginia) had identifiable positions. A handful of other states, including Kansas, had had science advisers in the past, and about half received advice from science and technology advisory boards. Unlike science advisers, however, these boards generally address narrower issues, such as science education and fostering ties between academia and industry. Since 2006, progress has been slow but steady. The governors of Ohio and Wisconsin appointed science advisers. Massachusetts created two advisory bodies to inform science education and ocean management in the state. Two recent reports also drew attention to the issue. A 2008 report from the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) and a 2007 report from the National Governors Association and Pew Center on the States considered the options for providing science advice to states—ranging from science advisers in the governor’s office to state academies of science. These reports concluded that regardless of its structure, scientific expertise should be accessible to state governments in order to help officials foster innovation, make sound investments in public-private partnerships, and formulate public policy. bodies. Idaho Governor C. L. “Butch” Otter (R) disbanded his state’s Science and Technology Advisory Council in 2008. In 2005, Tennessee Governor Phil Bredesen (D) targeted a quarter of his state’s advisory commissions for termination, including the Science and Technology Advisory Council, to save money and reduce bureaucracy. Science advisers are also susceptible to political influence, especially when appointed by a governor: Science advisers have no job security after an election. However, the 37 gubernatorial elections this November provide an opportunity to increase the number of science advisers in state governments. For better or worse, elections are a chance to elevate the status of science within state governments and to encourage newly elected, or reelected, governors to add science advisers to their administrations. “States, like the federal government, are grappling with many issues where science expertise is crucial,” said Don Waller, professor and chair of the biological aspects of conservation major at the University of Wisconsin. “Scientists are trained to approach problems creatively and objectively—they enjoy looking at problems from many points of view. But states do not have the same staff or resources as the federal government has to respond to demands for scientific expertise. Recruiting a distinguished science adviser, or science advisory committee, represents a very cost-effective way to add that expertise.”

State Science and Technology Planning in West Virginia: Challenges Facing Practitioners

Many states that are involved in science and technology planning are selecting particular focus areas for state investment. In states with strong science and technology capacity, focus areas can relate to existing strengths. In predominantly rural states, there may not be a strong science and technology foundation, so new areas that do not reflect existing strengths may be selected. This article describes West Virginia’s first effort in statewide science and technology planning. The article shows that the existing research and development capability is dominated by the chemicals industry but that the recently formed Science and Technology Advisory Council looked to new areas (information technologies and identification technologies) for investment and development. The rationale for the selection of these areas is explained.

A Review of Science Education: Past Failures, Future Hopes

Research Article| April 01 1991 A Review of Science Education: Past Failures, Future Hopes Eva M. Ogens Eva M. Ogens Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar The American Biology Teacher (1991) 53 (4): 199–203. https://doi.org/10.2307/4449269 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Eva M. Ogens; A Review of Science Education: Past Failures, Future Hopes. The American Biology Teacher 1 April 1991; 53 (4): 199–203. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/4449269 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentThe American Biology Teacher Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1990 National Association of Biology Teachers Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

The Continental Drift

The fourth Duke of Edinburgh's Lecture was presented by Professor P. M. S. Blackett, C.H., P.R.S., at the nineteenth Annual General Meeting, held in the Royal Geographical Society's house on 27 October 1965, with the President in the Chair. The President introduced the lecturer as one of the most eminent physicists of our time. Over the last thirty years he had held a number of very distinguished appointments, and was until recently Professor of Physics at the Imperial College of Science and Technology. He is now deputy chairman of the Ministry of Technology's Advisory Council. In 1948 Professor Blackett was awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics. A summary of the main points covered is given below.