Percutaneous Access Techniques Research Articles

European Section of Urotechnology educational video on fluoroscopic‐guided puncture in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: all techniques step by step

To describe the most common fluoroscopic-guided access techniques during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in a step-by-step manner and to assist in the standardisation of their technique and terminology. A high-quality animation video was created for each of the respective fluoroscopic techniques, focusing into the parallel projection of external surgical manoeuvres and their effect in the three-dimensional space of the kidney. Four predominant fluoroscopic-guided percutaneous access techniques are available, each with different advantages and limitations. Monoplanar access is used when a stable single-axis fluoroscopic generator is available and is mostly based on surgeons' experience. Biplanar access uses a second fluoroscopy axis to assess puncture depth. The 'bull's eye' technique follows a coaxial to fluoroscopy puncture path and is associated with a shorter learning curve at the cost of increased hand radiation exposure. Hybrid and conventional triangulate techniques use target projection by two fluoroscopic planes to define the exact localisation of the target in space and access it through a third puncture site. Fluoroscopic guidance during PCNL puncture is a very efficient method for access establishment. The percutaneous surgeon should be familiar with all available variations of fluoroscopic approach in order to be prepared to adapt puncture technique for any given scenario.

Safety and Efficacy of Totally Percutaneous Access Compared With Open Femoral Exposure for Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Purpose: To compare the safety and efficacy of percutaneous (PEVAR) vs open femoral access (OFA) techniques for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Methods: A systematic review of English-language articles (Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases) between January 1999 and August 2016 returned 11 studies including 1650 patients with 2500 groin accesses eligible for the meta-analysis. Data extracted from each study were synthesized to evaluate technical success rates, procedure time, and complications for the 2 access approaches. Data are presented as the odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The quality of individual studies was evaluated based on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results: The mean technical success rate in the PEVAR group was 94.5% (785/831). The overall OR was 0.38 (95% CI 0.12 to 1.18, p=0.09), indicating no significant difference between the methods. The procedure time in PEVAR was shorter than OFA (mean difference −24.52, 95% CI −46.45 to −22.60, p<0.001). Overall, the total complication rate was 15.3% in the OFA group vs 7.8% in the PEVAR group (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.73, p<0.001). The meta-analysis identified significant differences between groups for all complications (p<0.001) and the following individual adverse events: wound infection (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.81, p=0.02), pseudoaneurysm (OR 8.07, 95% CI 1.54 to 42.32, p=0.01), seroma (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.55, p=0.008), and lymphocele or lymph leak (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.92, p=0.04). Conclusion: PEVAR had a similar technical success rate, shorter procedure time, and lower complication rate compared with OFA. Thus, percutaneous access appears to be the preferential approach for EVAR. However, larger and randomized studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions.

Bench-Top Feasibility Testing of a Novel Percutaneous Renal Access Technique: The Laser Direct Alignment Radiation Reduction Technique (DARRT).

Traditional techniques for obtaining percutaneous renal access utilize continuous fluoroscopy. In an attempt to minimize radiation exposure, we describe a novel laser direct alignment radiation reduction technique (DARRT) for percutaneous access and test it in a bench-top model. In this randomized-controlled bench-top study, 20 medical personnel obtained renal accesses using both the conventional bullseye technique and the laser DARRT. The primary endpoint was total fluoroscopy time. Secondary endpoints included insertion time, puncture attempts, course corrections, and subjective procedural difficulty. In the laser DARRT, fluoroscopy was used with the C-arm positioned with the laser beam at a 30° angle. The access needle and hub were aligned with the laser beam. Effective caliceal puncture was confirmed with fluoroscopy and direct vision. The Paired samples Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for statistical analysis with significance at p < 0.05. A total of 120 needle placements were recorded. Fluoroscopy time for needle access using the laser DARRT was significantly lower than the bullseye technique in all groups as follows: attendings (7.09 vs 18.51 seconds; p < 0.001), residents (6.55 vs 13.93 seconds; p = 0.001), and medical students (6.69 vs 20.22 seconds; p < 0.001). Students rated the laser DARRT easier to use (2.56 vs 4.89; p < 0.001). No difference was seen in total access time, puncture attempts, or course corrections between techniques. The laser DARRT reduced fluoroscopy time by 63%, compared with the conventional bullseye technique. The least experienced users found the laser DARRT significantly easier to learn. This novel technique is promising and merits additional testing in animal and human models.

Endoscopic Treatment of Renal Hydatid Cyst with Percutaneous Access through an All Seeing Needle.

A 44-year-old woman, who had had left flank pain for the previous 3 months, was treated successfully for renal hydatid cyst disease by using an endoscopic technique with percutaneous access through an all seeing needle. Abdominal ultrasonography showed a Gharbi type III cyst in the lower pole of the left kidney. Computerised tomography of the abdomen revealed a bulky solid-cystic mass with calcified and well-defined wall and daughter cyst without contrast enhancement. The patient, who refused any renal operation, underwent a percutaneous intervention with access through an all seeing needle access. There were no intraoperative or early postoperative complications. To our knowledge, this is the first published report of this minimally invasive percutaneous access technique through an all seeing needle.

Arterial access and arteriotomy site closure devices.

Arterial access and haemostasis are fundamental aspects of procedures performed in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. The first description of arterial access for cardiac catheterization was in 1948, when surgical cut-down was used to access the radial artery. Over the next 2 decades, the preferred arteriotomy method transitioned from the Sones approach of brachial artery cut-down to the Seldinger and Judkins technique of percutaneous femoral artery access. Compared with the femoral approach, percutaneous transradial access results in reduced access-site bleeding, faster time to ambulation, and greater patient comfort. Several large-scale, randomized trials have also reported a survival advantage in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with radial compared with femoral access. However, inconsistencies exist between the completed trials, and the underlying mechanism of a reduction in mortality with radial access is uncertain. Femoral artery haemostasis can be achieved with either manual compression or vascular closure devices, with recent studies suggesting improved outcomes with the use of active closure systems. Radial artery haemostasis is achieved through the use of wristbands that mimic manual compression, and 'non-occlusive' haemostasis reduces the risk of radial artery occlusion. Newer arterial access routes and closure approaches for large-bore devices are being actively investigated. Expertise in both femoral and radial artery access and intervention is essential for contemporary interventional cardiologists.

Percutaneous thoracolumbar decompression combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and fusion: a method for treating spinal degenerative pain in a biplane angiography suite with the avoidance of general anesthesia.

Spondylytic degeneration of the axial lumbar spine is a major cause of pain and disability. Recent advances in spinal surgical instrumentation, including percutaneous access and fusion techniques, have made possible the performance of instrumented fusion through small incisions. By blending strategies of interventional pain management, neuroradiology, and conventional spine surgery, it is now feasible to treat spinal axial pain using permanent fixation techniques and local anesthesia in the setting of a fluoroscopy suite using mild sedation and local anesthesia. The author presents a series of percutaneous thoracolumbar fusion procedures performed in a biplane neuroangiographic suite and without general anesthesia for the treatment of spondylytic pain. All procedures utilized pedicle screw fixation, harvesting of local bone autograft, and application of bone fusion material. In this series of 13 patients, a statistically significant reduction of pain was seen at both the 2-week post-operative timepoint, as well as at the time of longest follow-up (mean 40 weeks). The advanced and rapid imaging capabilities afforded by a neuroangiographic suite can be safely combined with percutaneous fusion techniques so as to allow for fusion therapies to be applied to patients where the avoidance of general anesthesia is desirable.

Percutaneous interventions in aortic disease.

Percutaneous access techniques for diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to the coronary and aortic branch vessels have been the mainstay of cardiovascular interventions for several decades. The development of catheter-based technologies to treat traumatic and degenerative pathology of the thoracic and abdominal aorta initially required the use of direct femoral access via open incisions because of the size of the devices and their delivery sheaths. Although the endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms (EVAR)1 ushered in an entirely new concept for managing aortic pathology, there was a concomitant development of a new series of complications associated with open vascular access. Of the devices approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, the profiles of the currently available components ranges from 9F to 25F inner diameter, which correlates to 11F to 27F outer diameter. In particular, delivery systems for thoracic endografts have 22F to 27F outer diameter and are traditionally placed via femoral artery cut-down or surgically created conduits. With the evolution of devices with smaller sheaths, the development of closure devices, and noninvasive imaging studies to assess the suitability of arteries for percutaneous access, there have been major changes in the approach and timing of aortic interventions. Over the years, many closure devices have been marketed to decrease the need for manual compression or reversal of anticoagulation after transfemoral percutaneous diagnostic or therapeutic interventions. To date, only suture-mediated closure devices have been used to manage larger catheter-based percutaneous interventions. Two suture-mediated percutaneous closure devices currently are available for potential off-label use in the closure of endograft access sites: Perclose Prostar XL and Perclose ProGlide (Abbott Vascular, Redwood City, CA). The Perclose Prostar XL device comes in 2 different sizes. The Prostar XL 8 is designed for closure of 6.5F to 8F access sites, and Prostar XL 10 is for closure …

Extended Use of Percutaneous Obstructed Vagina Access (POVA) Technique for Safe Entry Into Pyo/Hematometrocolpos

Extended Use of Percutaneous Obstructed Vagina Access (POVA) Technique for Safe Entry Into Pyo/Hematometrocolpos

Ultrasound-Guided Arm Ports: Indications, Techniques, and Management

PurposeVarious venous access devices are available, including peripheral venous lines, peripherally inserted central catheters lines, and subcutaneous port catheters. The latter provides medium-to long-term venous access and includes medical devices that can be inserted either on the chest (chest ports) or in the arm (arm ports). We report the techniques, dedicated indications, and main complications of arm port insertion using the ultrasonography (US) guidance method. MethodsTips and tricks of percutaneous real-time US-guided vein access technique in the arm are reviewed, and a brief literature review is reported. ResultsTechnical feasibility is almost 99%. US guidance allows depiction of anatomic variants, reduces the number of failed attempts, and increases the technical access rate compared with venography-guided access. Comparison of arm ports to chest ports reveals a higher global complication rate. We also report typical (mechanical) complications and dedicated indications, including contraindications to chest port insertion and selected patients for whom chest ports are not possible (eg, those with breast, head, and neck cancer; obesity; cosmesis; and requiring upright position). ConclusionsArm port insertion under US guidance is safe and effective, and has dedicated indications.

Direct Percutaneous Carotid Access for Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting

Purpose: To describe a direct percutaneous carotid access technique for carotid artery stenting (CAS) that circumvents the potential for embolization that can occur during catheter manipulation in the aortic arch during femoral access. Technique: After inducing anesthesia, an ultrasound transducer is placed at the base of the neck above the clavicle. A 21-G, 7-cm needle from a micropuncture introducer is used for single-wall puncture of the common carotid artery (CCA). A 0.018-inch guidewire is inserted into the needle for placement of a 4-F, 10-cm introducer. After placing a 0.035-inch angled guidewire in the external carotid artery, the 4-F introducer is exchanged for the closure device sheath (preclose technique). A regular 6-F introducer is then placed inside the closure device sheath, and a low dose (2000 units) of heparin is administered for the brief CAS procedure, which is performed under cerebral protection. After a successful procedure is confirmed, the protection device is retrieved, and the closure device is applied to seal the puncture. Conclusion: This approach has a low rate of neurological and access site complications. Percutaneous direct carotid access could extend the indications for CAS to include difficult anatomies, high-risk patients, and certain emergent situations that warrant easy and rapid access to the CCA.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and vascular complications definitions

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) requires large calibre catheters and is therefore associated with increased vascular complications. The aim of this study was to illustrate the impact of the different definitions of major vascular complications on their incidence and to underscore the importance of uniform reporting. We pooled dedicated databases of consecutive patients undergoing TAVR from two tertiary care facilities and looked for the incidence of major vascular complications using various previously reported definitions. The level of agreement (Kappa statistic) between the respective definitions and the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC) consensus definition of vascular complications was assessed. A total of 345 consecutive patients underwent transfemoral TAVR and were included in this analysis. A completely percutaneous access and closure technique was applied in 96% of cases. Arterial sheath size ranged between 18 and 24 Fr, the majority being 18 Fr (60%). Procedural success was reached in 94.5%. Depending on the definition used, major vascular complications occurred in 5.2-15.9% of patients. According to the VARC definitions, the rate of major and minor vascular complications was 9.0% and 9.6%, respectively. Major vascular complications according to VARC criteria demonstrated at least a substantial level of agreement with the SOURCE registry (k 0.80), the UK registry (k 0.82) the Italian registry (k 0.72) and "FRANCE" registry (k 0.70) definitions, compared to a moderate level of agreement with the definitions used in the German registry ( 0.47) and the 18 Fr Safety and Efficacy study (k 0.42). Minor complications according to VARC demonstrated a moderate agreement only with vascular complications using the German registry definition (k 0.54). Non-uniformity in how vascular complications are defined precludes any reliable comparison between previously reported TAVR registries. The VARC consensus document offers standardised endpoint definitions and should be universally adopted to obtain better insights into global TAVR experience.

Abstracts from the 28th Annual Meeting of the Engineering and Urology SocietyMay 4, 2013San Diego, CA

Abstracts from the 28th Annual Meeting of the Engineering and Urology SocietyMay 4, 2013San Diego, CA

Collecting System Percutaneous Access Using Real-Time Tracking Sensors: First Pig Model In Vivo Experience

Precise needle puncture of the renal collecting system is an essential but challenging step for successful percutaneous nephrolithotomy. We evaluated the efficiency of a new real-time electromagnetic tracking system for in vivo kidney puncture. Six anesthetized female pigs underwent ureterorenoscopy to place a catheter with an electromagnetic tracking sensor into the desired puncture site and ascertain puncture success. A tracked needle with a similar electromagnetic tracking sensor was subsequently navigated into the sensor in the catheter. Four punctures were performed by each of 2 surgeons in each pig, including 1 each in the kidney, middle ureter, and right and left sides. Outcome measurements were the number of attempts and the time needed to evaluate the virtual trajectory and perform percutaneous puncture. A total of 24 punctures were easily performed without complication. Surgeons required more time to evaluate the trajectory during ureteral than kidney puncture (median 15 seconds, range 14 to 18 vs 13, range 11 to 16, p=0.1). Median renal and ureteral puncture time was 19 (range 14 to 45) and 51 seconds (range 45 to 67), respectively (p=0.003). Two attempts were needed to achieve a successful ureteral puncture. The technique requires the presence of a renal stone for testing. The proposed electromagnetic tracking solution for renal collecting system puncture proved to be highly accurate, simple and quick. This method might represent a paradigm shift in percutaneous kidney access techniques.

External Jugular Vein Cross-Over as a New Technique for Percutaneous Central Venous Port Access in Case of Left Central Venous Occlusion

To report the cross-over venous catheter technique in case of left-sided central venous (internal jugular, subclavian and innominate veins) occlusion and right-sided central vein patency. A 60-year-old right breast cancer patient presented with a local recurrence requiring chemotherapy. He presented with a left-sided catheter-related central venous occlusion and radiodermatitis of the right chest and neck. The nonsymptomatic side of insertion was defined as the patient's left side. Successful percutaneous left-to-right external jugular vein (EJV) cross-over access tips and tricks are reported. They include performing (a) the EJV access at the lower neck, (b) the 0.032 hydrophilic guidewire (GW) catheterization of the venous curves, (c) the GW anchor technique into the inferior vena cava, (d) the GW + Glidecath catheter stiffening technique and (e) the over-the-stiff wire implantable catheter push. The cross-over technique was successful by using real-time ultrasonography/X-ray monitoring and interventional radiology tools (hydrophilic 0.032 in. and stiff 0.0035 in. GW and "J-shaped" Glidecath catheter) and the five-step technique. In case of left innominate vein occlusion and necessity of left neck venous access, percutaneous EJV access should be attempted under real-time ultrasound/X-ray monitoring when other standard (subclavian venous port and internal jugular vein) routes are no longer available.

Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Management of Urinary Calculi

Management of urinary calculi has changed from open pyelolithotomy and ureterolithotomy to predominantly non-invasive procedures such as extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) as well as endourological such as ureterorenoscopy (URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL). Technology has advanced rapidly allowing stone disease to be treated with minimally invasive techniques that have lower morbidity than the open operations of the past. Newer semi-rigid ureteroscopes of size 7 to 9 F allow visualisation of the ureter without traumatic dilatation. There is the flexible ureteroscope developed with smaller fibre optics, the addition of the working channel that allows the use of laser fibres for stone fragmentation and a greater deflection of the tip that enables all parts of the pelvicalyceal system to be inspected for stones. New generation lithotripters for ESWL deliver shockwave to a smaller focal zone so as to minimise damage to surrounding soft tissue but as a result, there are higher failure rates. PCNL, though more invasive than ESWL and URS, is the procedure of choice for large renal stones. It is highly efficient in such situations as newer equipment to disintegrate stone and newer techniques for percutaneous access has been developed. In addition to all these minimally invasive surgical techniques, there is medical therapy available to allow the expulsion of distal ureteric stones as well as alkalinising agents to dissolve uric acid stones. Metabolic evaluation is necessary for patients with recurrent stones. Dietary adjustments may help prevent recurrent stone formation in selected patients depending on the results. With all these techniques currently available, management of urinary calculi has to be tailored according to the size, location of stone as well as patient preference.

Impact of Percutaneous Renal Access Technique on Outcomes of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is regarded as the gold standard for the treatment of patients with renal stones larger than 2 cm in diameter. Creating a percutaneous renal access is the initial and probably the most important step in performing a PCNL. Two primary methods of obtaining proper percutaneous renal access under fluoroscopic guidance are described: The "triangulation" and the "eye of the needle" techniques. In this article, we compare these two techniques in terms of success and complication rates. From October 2010 to May 2011, 80 patients with simple renal stones were prospectively randomized into two groups according to the percutaneous renal access technique used for PCNL. Patients in group 1 (n=40) were assigned to the eye of the needle technique, and patients in group 2 (n=40) were assigned to the triangulation method. Patients needing multiple access points were excluded from the study. The preoperative, operative, and postoperative follow-up findings were thereafter analyzed and compared. No significant difference between the two groups was detected in terms of patient demographics (mean patient age, body mass index, stone size, or stone location). The operation time, fluoroscopic screening time (FST), and duration of hospitalization were similar in both groups (P=0.52, P=0.32, P=0.26, respectively). Patients in group 1 had a larger drop in hematocrit postoperatively than patients in group 2 (7.6 ± 3.7 vs 4.8 ± 2.1, P=0.001). The blood transfusion rate (7.5%) was similar in both groups, however. Although the complication rate was higher in group 1 than group 2, no significant difference was detected (20% vs 15%, P=0.76). The present study demonstrates that PCNL can be performed safely using two different percutaneous access techniques. The two techniques studied in this trial had similar FSTs, operation and hospitalization times, success rates, and complication rates.

E43 Comparison of two percutaneous renal access techniques: “Eye of the needle method” versus “triangulation technique”: A prospective randomized clinical trial

E43 Comparison of two percutaneous renal access techniques: “Eye of the needle method” versus “triangulation technique”: A prospective randomized clinical trial

Percutaneous in Situ Oxygenated Pump Perfusion of a Transplanted Kidney during Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

The surgical management of aortic aneurysms in kidney transplant patients is a difficult clinical scenario where preservation of the kidney allograft during aortic cross-clamping is paramount. We describe a novel technique for renal protection during abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with in situ oxygenated pump perfusion of the transplanted kidney. A percutaneous approach is used for common femoral artery and vein cannulation and a cardiopulmonary bypass circuit to provide retrograde oxygenated pump perfusion to the transplanted kidney. This technique allows adequate kidney perfusion during warm ischemia and minimizes morbidity by using a percutaneous access technique.

Access Platform Techniques for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

One of the unique variables for successful implantation of transcatheter aortic valves involves the ability to secure an access route for deployment of the aortic valve. A large number of the high-risk patients with critical aortic stenosis referred for transcatheter valve implantation approach may not be candidates for the femoral approach due to peripheral vascular disease with the morbidity and mortality increased severalfold in patients who develop access related complications. A thorough knowledge and review of various alternate access site techniques and trouble shooting are therefore important and required by the implanting cardiac surgeons involved in transcatheter aortic valve therapy. The article review highlights the various percutaneous, hybrid, and surgical access techniques platforms available as well as options for implantation of these devices.

Percutaneous Nephroscopic Surgery

With the development of techniques for percutaneous access and equipment to disintegrate calculi, percutaneous nephroscopic surgery is currently used by many urologists and is the procedure of choice for the removal of large renal calculi and the management of diverticula, intrarenal strictures, and urothelial cancer. Although it is more invasive than shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde ureteroscopic surgery, percutaneous nephroscopic surgery has been successfully performed with high efficiency and low morbidity in difficult renal anatomies and patient conditions. These advantages of minimal invasiveness were rapidly perceived and applied to the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction, calyceal diverticulum, infundibular stenosis, and urothelial cancer. The basic principle of endopyelotomy is a full-thickness incision of the narrow segment followed by prolonged stenting and drainage to allow regeneration of an adequate caliber ureter. The preferred technique for a calyceal diverticulum continues to be debated. Excellent long-term success has been reported with percutaneous, ureteroscopic, and laparoscopic techniques. Each approach is based on the location and size of the diverticulum. So far, percutaneous ablation of the calyceal diverticulum is the most established minimally invasive technique. Infundibular stenosis is an acquired condition usually associated with inflammation or stones. Reported series of percutaneously treated infundibular stenosis are few. In contrast with a calyceal diverticulum, infundibular stenosis is a more difficult entity to treat with only a 50-76% success rate by percutaneous techniques. Currently, percutaneous nephroscopic resection of transitional cell carcinoma in the renal calyx can be applied in indicated cases.