Tenodesis Techniques Research Articles

Age-specific over-the-top techniques for physeal sparing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in skeletally immature patients: Current concepts for prepubescents to older adolescents.

Tailored surgical strategies for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in skeletally immature patients are presented, emphasizing techniques to minimize growth plate damage and ensure stability. As ACL injuries in youth increase, delaying surgery can lead to joint damage and poor recovery outcomes. Using magnetic resonance imaging-based assessments of skeletal maturity, the authors propose the 'over-the-top (OTT)' approach with lateral tenodesis, adapted for three growth stages: prepubescents, young adolescents and older adolescents. For prepubescents, the extra-physeal approach avoids growth plate drilling; for young adolescents, the supra-physeal technique places tunnels above the growth plate; and for older adolescents, the trans-physeal method mirrors adult techniques, as growth plates are closing. The minimally invasive OTT technique preserves hamstring insertion, ensures isometric graft placement, and allows for combined intra- and extra-articular procedures to improve rotational control and protect the graft. Clinical outcomes highlight high return-to-sport rates, minimal growth disturbances, and low failure rates, although older adolescents show higher graft failures due to activity levels. Various adaptations of the OTT and lateral tenodesis techniques utilizing hamstring tendons provide promising solutions for addressing ACL injuries in skeletally immature patients, ranging from prepubescence to late adolescence. Assessing skeletal age and estimating remaining bone growth are essential for selecting the most appropriate surgical method. The biomechanical principles and positive clinical results observed across different patient groups highlight these techniques as effective, safe and attractive options for managing these challenging cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Carpal Kinematics in the Normal, Scapholunate Ligament Deficient, and Surgically Reconstructed Wrist.

The objective of this study was to evaluate scaphoid, lunate and capitate kinematics after disruption to the primary and secondary scapholunate ligamentous stabilizers, and to assess the effectiveness of scapholunate ligament reconstruction in restoring carpal kinematics post-operatively. Seven upper extremities were harvested, and the scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) was divided. Specimens were mounted onto a computer-controlled dynamic wrist simulator, and simulations of flexion-extension, radial-ulnar deviation, and dart-thrower's motion were undertaken by simulated force application to the wrist tendons. Three-dimensional kinematics of the scaphoid, lunate and capitate were measured using bi-plane X-ray fluoroscopy in the native and ligament deficient state. The SLIL was then reconstructed by either dorsal transarticular loop tenodesis (DTLT), or by the three-ligament tenodesis (3LT) technique, and re-evaluated. SLIL deficiency resulted in significant differences in carpal kinematics compared to that in the healthy wrist across all wrist motions (p < 0.05). The DTLT procedure corrected increased scaphoid ulnar deviation and pronation in the SLIL deficient wrist, but did not significantly improve scaphoid flexion or volar translation of the scaphoid. The 3LT reconstructive technique restored scaphoid flexion and ulnar deviation but did not correct pronation, the increased lunate extension, nor the volar and ulnar translation observed in the ligament deficient wrist. Three-dimensional scaphoid, lunate and capitate motion depends on SLIL integrity, with tears to this ligament resulting in pathological kinematics, which may be partially mitigated with DTLT and 3LT surgical reconstruction. These findings suggest that this surgical reconstruction of the SLIL may not mitigate long-term degenerative joint conditions at the wrist.

Arthroscopic Inlay Suprapectoral versus Mini-Open Onlay Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis: A Prospective, Randomized Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Ultrasound-Assessed Structural Integrity.

Surgical techniques for biceps tenodesis vary in approach, fixation strategy, and anatomic location without clear superior technique for this common procedure. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate a randomized cohort of patients undergoing arthroscopic suprapectoral (ASBT) with interference screw fixation using an inlay technique versus mini-open subpectoral (MOBT) with a unicortical button implant using an onlay technique with regards to 1) clinical outcome measures and 2) structural healing as evaluated by ultrasound. From May 2017 to April 2021, patients undergoing biceps tenodesis were preoperatively randomized to either ASBT or MOBT. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were recorded at baseline, three months, and two years postoperatively. The integrity of the biceps tendon at the tenodesis site was independently examined via ultrasound by a musculoskeletal trained radiologist at three months and two years postoperatively. T-tests were performed for continuous variables, while Chi squared tests were performed for categorical variables. A total of 52 patients (24 ASBT, 28 MOBT) were randomized and completed follow-up. At baseline, three months, and two years postoperatively, the mean ASES, SANE and VAS scores were not statistically different between ASBT and MOBT. At the three-month postoperative ultrasound, 23/24 (96%) of the ASBT patients and 26/28 (93%) of the MOBT patients were noted to have a clearly intact biceps tenodesis. At two years, all biceps tenodesis regardless of group were noted to be intact and healed, including all three shoulders whose ultrasound noted a questionably intact repair without significant retraction of the tendon at prior three-month ultrasound evaluation. This study demonstrates similar clinical outcomes at two year follow-up between ASBT and MOBT. Both groups demonstrated improvement that exceeded the reported patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Ultrasound showed excellent structural healing rates for both inlay and onlay biceps tenodesis techniques. Level II; Randomized Controlled Trial; Treatment Study.

Outcomes of Subpectoral Tenodesis in the Treatment of Proximal Biceps Pathologies.

Introduction The aim of this article is to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of subpectoral tenodesis of the long head of the biceps (LHB) in the treatment of proximal biceps pathologies. Methods A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted through the analysis of medical records from 24 patients and 26 shoulders who underwent the subpectoral tenodesis technique using bone tunnels. Three patients were excluded due to insufficient data to calculate the functional scores. The final study sample comprised 21 patients and 23 shoulders. Clinical and functional outcomes were evaluated based on the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score and the Long Head of Biceps (LHB) Score. Additionally, the main indications for the procedure and potential complications were thoroughly assessed. Results The average follow-up time was four years and, of the 21 patients (23 shoulders), 19 (82.6%) were male and 4 (17.4%) were female shoulders, with a mean age of 41.6 years. The main indication for surgery was superior labral anterior to posteriorinjury in 12 (52.2%) cases, followed by subluxation and tenosynovitis. No case presented aesthetic deformity or pain on palpation at the LHB. Patients showed significant improvement in the ASES score (average from 75.13 to 98.52) and LHB score (average from 68.82 to 98.34). Conclusion Thesubpectoral tenodesis technique is a safe procedure, with good clinical and functional outcomes for the treatment of proximal biceps pathologies.

Comparison of clinical outcomes and return to sport between unicortical versus bicortical button fixation techniques for subpectoral biceps tenodesis.

There is limited clinical outcome data comparing fixation methods for tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT), particularly button fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, and return to sport (RTS) between patients undergoing LHBT with bicortical versus unicortical button technique. The authors hypothesized these fixation methods would be similar for all outcomes. Patients who underwent LHBT using unicortical or bicortical button fixation with minimum 2-year follow-up were identified. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) questionnaire and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score. A sports activity survey was collected to assess baseline sport participation and ability to return to pre-injury activities. Continuous variables were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney-U test. Categorical variables were analyzed using Chi-squared tests. Multivariable logistic and linear regression were performed to determine predictors of RTS and time to RTS. Sixty-four subjects (19 unicortical and 45 bicortical button fixation) were included (average follow-up 3.5 (range: 2.0-7.8) years). There were no significant differences found between button groups for VAS pain score (1.5 vs. 1.2; p = 0.876), VAS pain during sport score (1.6 vs. 1.1, p = 0.398), and ASES score (66 vs. 71; p = 0.294). There were no significant differences in rate of RTS (75.0 vs. 77.4%; p = 0.885) or average time to return to sport (11.7 ± 7.3 vs. 7.0 ± 4.0months; p = 0.081) between groups. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes, pain, or return to sport between patients who underwent LHBT with unicortical or bicortical button fixation.

Age and Surgical Volume Impact Likelihood and Technique of Lateral Extraarticular Augmentation During Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

To evaluate the current utilization trends of practicing surgeons performing and lateral extra-articular augmentation (LEA) at the time of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The survey was distributed via e-mail in August 2023 to members of the Arthroscopy Association of North America who identified as knee surgeons and was available online on the Arthroscopy Association of North America website from January to September 2023. The 18-question survey was designed regarding surgeons' surgical utilization patterns of LEA during ACLR. Survey questions were created based on prior published research and recommendations regarding indications for LEA, as well as surgeon factors that have been shown to influence operative decision-making. Data were analyzed by surgeon geographics, procedure preferences, patient-based decision factors, surgeon-based decision factors, and surgeon age. The survey was completed by 165 sports medicine surgeons who identified as arthroscopic knee surgeons. Majority practice types included private practice (42.1%), academic centers (26.8%), and hospital systems (20.7%). Surgeon age was 50.36 years (range, 33-77 years). In total, 6.8% perform <20 ACLRs per year, 30.2% perform 20 to 40, 26.5% perform 40 to 60, 10.5% perform 60 to 80, and 25.9% perform >80 per year. Of the surgeons, 79.4% conduct LEA, with the modified Lemaire being the most common technique (43.5%), followed by other lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) techniques (42.0%) and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALL) (27.5%). Some surgeons (14.5%) use more than 1 technique. High-volume (>60 ACLR/year) surgeons were more likely to perform LEA (23.1% vs 10.0%, P= .061) and more likely to perform anterolateral ligament reconstruction (32.2% vs 16.5%, P= .034). Younger surgeons (age <50) were more likely to use the modified Lemaire (44.4% vs 24.3%, P= .014). Decision-making to perform LEA weighted highly on patient hyperlaxity, pivot-shift severity, knee hyperextension, sport type, and age, respectively. The most reported surgeon-related factor influencing LEA utilization was training bias (38.9%). Most orthopaedic surgeons with diverse geographics, demographics, practice setting, and ACLR volume perform LEA. Younger surgeons perform more frequently LEA, and surgeons admit to training bias in decision-making. Patient factors highly impacting utilization of LEA are hyperlaxity, pivot-shift severity, knee hyperextension, sport, and age. LEA procedures for ACLR have become increasingly utilized in populations at high risk for rerupture. However, there is not currently a clear standard of care with regard to LEA procedure type or indications for augmentation.

Kaplan fibers of iliotibial band: a comprehensive review of current literature.

This review highlights the pivotal role of Kaplan fibers (KFs) in knee stability, particularly in the anterolateral aspect. Studies reveal their complex anatomy with varying attachments to the distal femur, demonstrating a significant impact on knee joint mechanics across different populations. Investigations into the biomechanics of KFs show their crucial role in maintaining rotational stability of the knee, especially during rotational movements. Their synergistic function with other knee structures, like the anterolateral ligament, is emphasized, underscoring their importance in knee integrity and function. MRI emerges as a key tool in detecting KFs, with varying visibility and prevalence of injuries. The review discusses the development of MRI criteria for accurate diagnosis, highlighting the need for further research to refine these criteria and understand the interplay between KF injuries, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures, and associated knee pathologies. The review covers various lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) techniques used to address residual laxity and instability following ACL reconstruction. Among them, the modified Lemaire technique, which resembles the anatomical and functional characteristics of distal KFs, shows effectiveness in reducing internal rotation and residual laxity. The review emphasizes the need for further research to understand the healing dynamics of KF injuries and the efficacy of different LET techniques. It suggests that a comprehensive approach, considering both biomechanical and clinical aspects, is crucial for advancing knee joint health and rehabilitation.

Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis: A Knotless, Onlay, All-Suture Anchor Technique

Anterior shoulder pain is a common complaint often caused by pathology of the long head of the biceps such as biceps tendinitis, partial biceps tears, biceps instability, and SLAP lesions. Surgical treatment of biceps pathology includes tenotomy versus tenodesis, with tenodesis being favored in young, active patients owing to less cramping pain and superior outcomes in terms of shoulder function and cosmesis. Various surgical techniques for tenodesis of the long head of the biceps exist, with varying indications. Subpectoral biceps tenodesis is primarily indicated for zone 2 to 3 tendon pathology and revision biceps tenodesis. Secondary indications include overhead athletes, chronic biceps tendinopathy, and rotator cuff repair. Proximal arthroscopic biceps tenodesis performed “high in the groove” has been shown to preserve biceps length and reduce Popeye deformity compared with tenotomy. Knotless techniques are becoming popular; they provide low-profile fixation that limits knot abrasion and is not reliant on knot security for fixation. We present a variation of suprapectoral biceps tenodesis using knotless fixation in an onlay technique.

All Suture Biceps Tenodesis Has Greater Biomechanical Strength Than Metal Button Fixation

To evaluate the maximal load to failure, cyclic displacement, stiffness, and modes of failure of onlay subpectoral biceps tenodesis with an intramedullary unicortical metal button (MB) versus an inlay, all-suture Caspari-Weber (CW) technique. Sixteen matched paired human cadaveric proximal humeri were randomly allocated for subpectoral BT with either CW or MB using a high-strength suture (N= 16; 8 male, 8 female, mean age= 82.5 years, range 62-99 years). Specimens were tested on a servohydraulic mechanical testing apparatus under cyclic load for 1,000 cycles and then loaded to failure. Maximal load to failure, displacement, construct stiffness, and mode of failure were compared. There was no significant difference between groups when comparing construct stiffness, creep displacement, or displacement at ultimate load. The maximal load to failure for the CW technique was greater than the unicortical MB (588.36 ± 149.06 N vs 375.83 ± 131.4 N, P= .014). In this study, the all-suture CW biceps tenodesis technique had a greater maximal load to failure than the onlay unicortical MB technique while having similar construct displacement and stiffness. The CW subpectoral biceps tenodesis may offer a lower cost alternative with a mechanically robust fixation when performing an open subpectoral biceps tenodesis. This cadaveric biomechanical study can help guide surgeons when selecting a fixation technique for biceps tenodesis.

Poster 131: Loop 'N' Tack Tenodesis: A Multi-Center Retrospective Case Series of Clinical and Patient Reported Outcomes of a Novel Suture Technique for Proximal Biceps Tenodesis

Objectives: Tenodesis and tenotomy of the long head of the biceps are treatment options for a wide range of pathologies without clear superior technique or site of fixation. Tenotomy may result in a cosmetic “Popeye” deformity and fatigue pain. The Loop ‘N’ Tack technique is a quick, simple, and knotless technique for tenodesis of the long head of the biceps that can be completed entirely arthroscopically. The tensionless repair allows the biceps to scar within the biceps groove, thereby reducing subsidence and formation of a “Popeye" deformity and fatigue pain in the biceps seen with tenotomy alone while eliminating the ability to overtension. The primary objective will be to retrospectively report the clinical outcomes and associated complications of patients undergoing biceps tenodesis utilizing the Loop ‘N’ Tack technique at multiple institutions from 1/1/2015 – 7/25/2021. Methods: CPT procedure codes (29827,29823, 29826) were used to identify participants in the EHR (i.e., Epic) who underwent the Loop ‘N’ Tack biceps tenodesis technique by each author at 9 separate institutions. Patient reported outcomes (PRO) including Visual Analog Scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), UCLA Shoulder Rating Scale (UCLA), and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) were recorded at multiple time points throughout the patient’s preoperative and postoperative course. Scores were compared to the established minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for each PRO to assess the viability of this tenodesis technique. Additional metrics including bicipital groove pain, Popeye deformity, and need for revision surgery were also recorded. Results: 1,473 patients were initially screened who underwent the Loop ‘N’ Tack biceps tenodesis technique. 82 patients were excluded secondary to limited follow up or lack of PRO data within the EHR. The average patient age was 64.7 years old with average follow up of 8.11 months. Mean preoperative PRO scores were 5.64 (2.13), 43.31 (20.38), 15.14 (3.52), 5.81 (1.92), and 49.24 (15.06) for the VAS, SANE, UCLA, SST, and ASES scores, respectively. Postoperative PRO scores at most recent follow up respectively measured 1.05 (1.66), 89.56 (17.06), 31.50 (4.01), 10.69 (1.92), and 89.48 (13.81). MCID was reached for each PRO at the 1-2 month mark postoperatively. 36 patients (2.6%) underwent revision surgery for biceps related pathology, while 40 patients (2.9%) required revision shoulder surgery for a separate pathology. Postoperative Popeye deformity was noted in 15 patients (1.08%). Conclusions: The Loop ‘N’ Tack technique results in high rates of patient satisfaction with improvement in shoulder related patient reported outcomes, low incidence of postoperative pain, and low rates of Popeye deformity. This case series establishes the Loop ‘N’ Tack technique as a viable tenodesis approach during shoulder arthroscopy for biceps related pathology.

All-Suture Anchor Techniques for Biceps Tenodesis Are Noninferior in End-Cycle Stiffness to an Interference Screw Technique; However, Secondary Outcomes, Such as Ultimate Failure Load, Yield Load, Creep, and Load-to-Failure Stiffness, Are Inferior in an Ovine Model

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to assess the biomechanical performance of two simplified loop and tack biceps tenodesis techniques, all-suture anchor and all-suture anchor with a button, compared to the interference screw technique in an ovine model. MethodsTwenty-one biceps tenodesis procedures were executed on the humeri and flexor digitorum profundus tendons of skeletally mature, female sheep. Limbs were evenly randomized into two experimental groups (all-suture anchor with/without button) and one control group (interference screw). Cyclic loading followed by a load-to-failure test was conducted.The primary outcome metric was end-cycle stiffness, or stiffness measured at the end of cyclic loading, as it modeled the resistance of the construct to the lower-force activities of postoperative physical therapy. Secondary metrics included ultimate failure load (UFL), yield load, creep, and load-to-failure stiffness. End-cycle stiffness difference-of-means testing was conducted with a minimal clinically significant difference (MCID) threshold of -15N/mm (1.5kg/mm). Groups were compared using ANOVA for all recorded variables. ResultsBoth the all-suture anchor and all-suture anchor with button techniques were found to be noninferior in end-cycle stiffness compared to the interference screw technique (-5.2N/mm, 95% CI [-13.6, 3.3] and –3.8N/mm, 95% CI [-12.5, -4.9]) for -15N/mm MCID. The all-suture techniques showed significantly lower UFL, lower yield load, greater creep, and lower load-to-failure stiffness (P<0.001, P<0.001, P=0.002, P<0.001, respectively). Tendon dimensions did not vary significantly across groups. ConclusionsUnder subfailure loading conditions, the all-suture anchor with/without button techniques demonstrated end-cycle stiffness noninferiority with an interference screw technique, however, these techniques were inferior in all secondary outcomes, including significantly lower UFL, lower yield load, greater creep, and lower load-to-failure stiffness. Clinical RelevanceThe all-suture anchor with/without button approaches may retain the natural length-tension dynamics of the long head biceps tendon as fixation can occur before releasing the tendon origin. Additionally, it may offer a simpler and more cost-effective alternative to prevailing arthroscopic methods.

Surgical Techniques in Nontraumatic Midcarpal Instability: Evaluating the Dorsal Capsulodesis and 3-Ligament Tenodesis Technique.

Surgical management of midcarpal instability (MCI), also referred to as carpal instability nondissociative, remains controversial because of limited evidence on different techniques. This study aimed to assess and compare differences in patient-reported pain, hand and wrist function, satisfaction, range of motion, and return to work in patients with nontraumatic MCI who underwent surgical treatment either through dorsal wrist capsulodesis or 3-ligament tenodesis (3LT). Patients with MCI and persisting complaints after conservative therapy treated with 3LT or dorsal capsulodesis were included. Patients with posttraumatic instability were excluded. Primary endpoints included the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation and Satisfaction with Treatment Result Questionnaire at 12 months postoperatively. All data were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 91 patients treated with dorsal capsulodesis and 21 treated with 3LT between December of 2011 and December of 2019 were included. At 12 months postoperatively, both treatment groups reported significant improvements in pain and function scores. However, at 3 months postoperatively, the dorsal capsulodesis group exhibited significantly better outcomes, followed by a greater return-to-work rate (72%) compared with the 3LT group (50%). However, the capsulodesis group demonstrated a decreased range of motion at 3 months that was restored at 12 months postoperatively. No significant difference in satisfaction with treatment was observed. Both 3LT and dorsal capsulodesis demonstrate promising results for addressing nontraumatic MCI. However, considering the quicker recovery and faster return to work associated with dorsal capsulodesis, the authors recommend favoring capsulodesis over 3LT when both surgical options are deemed suitable for the patient.

No clinical difference in outcomes between inlay and onlay arthroscopic biceps tenodesis techniques during rotator cuff repair

BackgroundBoth inlay and onlay arthroscopic biceps tenodesis (ABT) are common procedures performed during rotator cuff repair. The inlay method involves creating a bone socket in the bicipital groove to secure the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) using an interference screw. The onlay method utilizes a suture anchor to secure the LHBT on the surface of the bicipital groove. Little is known on the long-term differences in patient reported outcomes (PROs) between these two techniques. The primary purpose of this study was to compare PROs of inlay versus onlay ABT with a minimum follow-up of two years. Secondary aims were to evaluate the impact of rotator cuff tear size on outcomes and compare rates of complications between the two techniques. MethodsA retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients who had an ABT during a full-thickness rotator cuff repair. Any symptom specific to the biceps were noted, including pain and cramping, Popeye deformity, or revision surgery. Complication rates were compared between groups. The VAS pain score, ASES, SANE, and VR-12 scores were compared at two years. The impact of rotator cuff tear size was analyzed by categorizing into small/medium or large/massive based on operative reports and arthroscopic images. ResultsThere were 165 patients identified (106 in the inlay group and 59 in the onlay group). No revision surgeries were performed secondary to the biceps tendon in either group. Eleven patients (10%) in the inlay group complained of biceps pain or cramping compared to 2 patients (3%) in the onlay group (p = .11). One Popeye deformity was noted in each group (p = .67). No significant differences were found between groups for VAS (p=.41), ASES functional (p = .61), ASES Index (p = .91), SANE (p = .09), VR-12 PCS (p = .77), or VR-12 MCS (p = .09). Rotator cuff tear size within the groups also did not demonstrate statistical significance. ConclusionNo clinical differences or complications were found at minimum two-year follow-up between inlay and onlay arthroscopic biceps tenodesis in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair when controlling for tear size. The clinical relevance suggests either technique is effective and can be based on surgeon preference.

Posterolateral Intra-/Extra-articular Tenodesis Technique: A Technique for Lateral Tenodesis of the Knee

Posterolateral tenodesis is necessary for restoring biomechanics in posterolateral instability of the knee. We propose a technique that provides the tenodesis effect to both intra- and extra-articular aspects of the knee. We call it the posterolateral intra-/extra-articular tenodesis technique, which is a technique for posterolateral reconstruction. This minimally invasive technique is particularly helpful in patients with high-grade posterolateral corner injury with the advantage of precise placement of the graft.

Cost-Effective, Implant-Free, All-Suture Modified Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Technique

Tendinopathy and partial tears of the long head of the biceps tendon are a common cause of anterior shoulder pain and are often associated with many other shoulder pathologies. Multiple open and arthroscopic tenodesis techniques exist in the literature, with varying locations along the proximal humerus and a multitude of different implants. This article describes a cost-effective, implant-free, subpectoral biceps tenodesis technique that can be used as open or in conjunction with arthroscopy. Our technique differs from other tunnel techniques in its modified docking configuration into the intraosseous canal, decreasing stresses at the bone-tendon interface. With the cost amounting to 5% to 10% of techniques using implants, this is a cost-saving and reliable option for tenodesis.

One-Step Release Technique for Tendon Extraction During Biceps Tenodesis

All biceps tenodesis techniques involving extra-articular tendon preparation consist of 2 distinct steps for tenotomy and tendon grasping. These 2 maneuvers are performed by different instruments. A single-step tendon release technique is described for both arthroscopic and open shoulder surgery. This technique finds application in arthroscopic proximal suprapectoral tenodesis, open treatment of proximal humerus fractures, and suprapectoral mini-open tenodesis. Herein, we describe an arthroscopic biceps tenodesis technique that combines the actions of cutting and gripping the tendon in a single step.

All-Arthroscopic Falciform Portal Biceps Tenodesis

Biceps tenodesis has been proven to be an effective treatment for biceps tendon and superior labral pathology. Many techniques including both open and arthroscopic approaches have been reported. Open techniques afford management of the entire proximal biceps tendon but are limited by wound healing issues, increased bleeding, and increased surgical time. Arthroscopic tenodesis offers benefits in terms of surgical efficiency, cosmesis, and bleeding risk. However, standard arthroscopic tenodesis only addresses intra-articular biceps pathology. In this report we describe an all-arthroscopic biceps tenodesis technique at the suprapectoral region of the humerus using knotless suture anchor fixation.

A study on Subscapularis augmented Bankart repair (SB) vs capsulo-labral Bankart repair (CB) for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with moderate glenoid bone loss (< 20 %) in non-athletepopulation

Introduction- Subscapularis augmented Bankart repair (SB) is a novel arthroscopic technique of tenodesis of upper 1/3rd fibers of subscapularis tendon to capsulo-labral repair of Bankart lesion. Treatment of Bony Bankart lesion with glenoid bone loss % (GBL%) 10%–20 % is still a grey zone where bone augmentation procedures are an overtreatment and capsulo-labral repair is associated with high recurrence. MethodologyA retrospective study of 30 patients with h/o anterior instability with GBL%<20 % were classified into two groups. SB group included patients managed with arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation while CB group included patients managed with arthroscopic capsulo-labral repair. These patients were followed up after a minimum of 24 months post-surgery and functional outcomes evaluated using WOSI, ASES and ROWE scores. ResultsPatients in the SB group showed superior functional outcomes for WOSI and ROWE scores. Considering postoperative shoulder pain, the median ROWE-P (pain) score was better for SB group (10/10) when compared to CB group (5/10). Patients under SB group were more comfortable with physical symptoms of their shoulder (WOSI-P average 60/1000) and were more likely to continue their recreational sports activity (WOSI- sports for SB 63.7 and CB 119.5. In our study, none of the 15 SB patients had any restriction in range of shoulder movements [ROWE-M score of 10]. Subscapularis augmented Bankart repair is associated with minimal restriction of shoulder range, better pain relief, better acceptability and smoother return to daily living and occupation and can be considered as a routine for every patient with GBL<20 %.

“Double Row Rip-Stop” Arthroscopic Repair Technique for Acute, Retracted Rotator Cuff Tears

Acute, retracted rotator cuff tendon tears are important to recognize and can present unique technical challenges to repair. Various arthroscopic techniques and suture configurations have been proposed for repair of acute tears with aims to maximize the repair footprint and optimize tendon fixation. The double row rip-stop configuration was designed and has been used for rotator cuff repair due to its potential advantages related to suture pullout, footprint reapproximation and load sharing. The purpose of this article is to present the author’s arthroscopic technique for repair of acute, retracted rotator cuff tendon tears using a double-row, rip-stop suture configuration. The indications and authors’ preferred arthroscopic technique for biceps tenodesis are also discussed.

A Radiostereometric Analysis of Tendon Migration After Arthroscopic and Mini-Open Biceps Tenodesis: Interference Screw Versus Single Suture Anchor Fixation.

Studies suggest that similar clinical results are achieved via arthroscopic and open biceps tenodesis (BT) techniques. To quantify the postoperative migration of the BT construct between arthroscopic suprapectoral BT (ASPBT) and open subpectoral BT (OSPBT) techniques via interference screw (IS) or single-suture suture anchor (SSSA) fixation using radiostereometric analysis. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Distal migration of the biceps tendon after OSPBT with a polyetheretherketone IS, OSPBT with 1 SSSA, ASPBT with polyetheretherketone IS, and ASPBT with 2 SSSAs was measured prospectively. Patients with symptomatic biceps tendinopathy and preoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including Constant-Murley subjective, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, or Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Upper Extremity scores were included. A tantalum bead was sutured on the proximal end of the long head of the biceps tendon before fixation of tendon tissue. Anteroposterior radiographs were performed immediately postoperatively, at 1 week, and at 3 months. Bead migration was measured, and preoperative PROMs were compared with those at latest follow-up. Of 115 patients, 94 (82%) were available for final follow-up. IS fixation yielded the least tendon migration with no difference between the open and arthroscopic approaches (4.31 vs 5.04 mm; P = .70). Fixation with 1 suture anchor demonstrated significantly greater migration than that achieved with an IS at both 1 week (6.47 vs 0.1 mm, 6.47 vs 1.75 mm, P < .001;) and 3 months (14.76 vs 4.31 mm, 14.76 vs 5.04 mm, P < .001) postoperatively. Two-suture anchor fixation yielded significantly greater migration than IS fixation at 1 week (7.02 vs 0.1 mm, P < .001; 7.02 vs 1.75 mm, P = .003) but not 3 months postoperatively (8.06 vs 4.31 mm, P = .10; 8.06 vs 5.04 mm, P = .07). Four patients with suture anchor fixation (3 patients in the OSPBT 1 SSSA group, 9.4%, and 1 patient in the ASPBT 2 SSSAs group, 3.8%) developed a Popeye deformity, whereas no Popeye deformities occurred in the IS groups. Mean 3-month bead migration in patients with and without a Popeye deformity was 60.8 and 11.2 mm, respectively (P < .0001). PROMs did not differ among groups at final follow-up. Interference screw fixation yielded the least tendon migration whether achieved arthroscopically or open. The available data indicated that fixation with 1 SSSA but not 2 SSSAs resulted in significantly greater migration than that achieved with an IS. Despite variations in tendon migration, PROMs were similar among all groups. When SSSAs are used, tendon migration may be minimized by using ≥2 anchors.