Skin Closure Techniques Research Articles

Wound healing after intracutaneous vs. staple-assisted skin closure in lumbar, non-instrumented spine surgery: a multicenter prospective randomized trial.

Superficial surgical site infection (SSSI) is a prominent problem in spine surgery. Intracutaneous sutures and staple-assisted closure are two widely used surgical techniques for skin closure. Yet, their comparative impact on wound healing and infection rates is underexplored. Our goal was to address this gap and compare wound healing between these two techniques. This study was a multicenter international prospective randomized trial. Patient data were prospectively collected at three large academic centers, patients who underwent non-instrumented lumbar primary spine surgery were included. Patients were intraoperatively randomized to either intracutaneous suture or staple-assisted closure cohorts. The primary endpoint was SSSI within 30days after surgery according to the wound infection Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) classification system. Of 207 patients, 110 were randomized to intracutaneous sutures and 97 to staple-assisted closure. Both groups were homogenous with respect to epidemiological as well as surgical parameters. Two patients (one of each group) suffered from an A1 wound infection at the 30-day follow up. Median skin closure time was faster in the staple-assisted closure group (198s vs. 13s, p < 0,001). This study showed an overall low superficial surgical site infection rate in both patient cohorts in primary non instrumented spine surgery.

Skin and Muscle Closure Techniques Following Large-Scale Osteosarcoma Removal: A Comparative Analysis.

Osteosarcoma (OS), the most prevalent form of bone cancer, typically arises in osteoblast cells responsible for generating new bone. The bone produced by these cancer cells is weaker compared to healthy bone. OS is an aggressive bone cancer that often requires extensive resection, leaving behind substantial soft tissue defects. Successful closure after tumor excision is critical for wound healing and postoperative recovery. However, the optimal approach varies depending on factors like defect size and location. After extensive resection of OS, restoring the integrity of the affected area demands careful closure of both the skin and underlying muscle. The appropriate closure technique depends on the size and location of the soft tissue defect. The main objective of this systematic review is to evaluate and compare different surgical techniques for closing skin and muscle layers following large-scale OS removal. Through a systematic review methodology, we conducted an extensive analysis of the existing body of literature on this topic, drawing from relevant research papers published over the past two decades. This allowed us to collectively evaluate and synthesize available data on the subject. This review found that negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and flap reconstruction are the main surgical approaches used to close skin and muscle following extensive OS resection, which commonly results in large soft tissue defects due to the nature of tumor removal. Furthermore, NPWT was the most widely used method for closing soft tissue defects after major OS removal, while flap reconstruction was also common when NPWT was not appropriate or the defect was too large. An integrated approach combining vacuum therapy, skin stretching, and occasional flaps seeks to primarily close large defects after OS resection through optimized healing and tension reduction to achieve the best postoperative results.

Comparison of Three Techniques for Skin Closure in Caesarean Delivery (Absorbable Subcuticular Sutures, Non-absorbable Nylon Sutures, Surgical Staplers): A Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of Three Techniques for Skin Closure in Caesarean Delivery (Absorbable Subcuticular Sutures, Non-absorbable Nylon Sutures, Surgical Staplers): A Randomized Controlled Trial

Octyl-2-cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive Closure Versus Subcuticular Suture for Post-Auricular Incisions.

Skin closure techniques in otolaryngology vary based on surgeon preference and wound site. Octyl-2-Cyanoacrylate may be a safe, rapid, and cost-effective option for post-site closure. This randomized controlled trial study aimed to compare Octyl-2-Cyanoacrylate and conventional subcuticular sutures in ear surgeries, assessing wound closure results in both case and control groups. This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study was conducted at Ohud Hospital from May 2021 to May 2022. Ear surgery and cochlear implantation in patients were examined, and each group was randomly assigned to receive Dermabond TM and deep layer subcuticular sutures closure. Incisions were assessed at various time points, including 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year post-surgery. The patient and observer Scar Assessment Scale was used, and two independent ear surgeons used the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale for initial scar assessment. This study involved 126 ear surgery and cochlear implantation patients randomized to use cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive or subcuticular suture for port site closure. The study found that tissue adhesive (OCA) was faster and more efficient than standard sutures, saving an average of 12 min per incision in each ear. Incision cosmesis showed immediate results and significant differences, and patient satisfaction with OCA wound closure was higher than standard sutures. The findings confirmed that cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive significantly reduced the time needed for skin closure during ear surgery and showed immediate cosmetic improvements without any documented instances of bleeding, hematoma, infection, or wound separation. This is a randomized controlled trial, it follows Level 2 of evidence. Randomized trial or observational study with dramatic effects Laryngoscope, 134:4036-4041, 2024.

Comparison of purse-string technique vs linear suture for skin closure after ileostomy reversal. A randomized controlled trial.

Protective stoma after rectal surgery has been associated with important complications. The most common is surgical site infection (SSI) high rates after stoma reversal reported in literature. Our study compared the rate of SSI of two skin closure techniques, linear closure, and purse string closure. We carried out a single center, prospective, randomized controlled trial in the Department of Colorectal Surgery of Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico of Rome between January 2018 through December 2021, to compare LC vs PS closure of ileostomy sites. A total of 117 patients (53.84% male) with a mean age of 65.68 ± 14.33years were finally evaluated in the study. 58 patients were included in the PS group and 59 patients in the LC one. There was a marked difference in the SSI rate between the two arms of the study: 3 of 58 patients in the purse-string arm versus 11 of 59 in the control arm (p = 0.043). The outcome of cosmesis was also higher in PS, with a statistical significance (mean ± DS 4,01 ± 0,73 for PS group vs mean ± DS 2,38 ± 0,72 for LC group, p < 0,001). Our study demonstrated that the PS technique had a significantly lower incidence of stoma site SSI compared with LC technique. Our findings are in line with other randomized studies and suggest that PS closure could be considered as standard of care for wound closure after ileostomy reversal.

Purse-string skin closure versus linear skin closure in people undergoing stoma reversal.

Stoma reversal is associated with a relatively high risk of surgical site infection (SSI), occurring in up to 40% of cases. This may be explained by the presence of microorganisms around the stoma site, and possible contamination with the intestinal contents during the open-end manipulation of the bowel, making the stoma closure site a clean-contaminated wound. The conventional technique for stoma reversal is linear skin closure (LSC). The purse-string skin closure (PSSC) technique (circumferential skin approximation) creates a small opening in the centre of the wound, enabling free drainage of contaminants and serous fluid. This could decrease the risk of SSI compared with LSC. To assess the effects of purse-string skin closure compared with linear skin closure in people undergoing stoma reversal. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two other databases, and three trials registers on 21 December 2022. We also checked references, searched for citations, and contacted study authors to identify additional studies. We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PSSC and LSC techniques in people undergoing closure of stoma (loop ileostomy, end ileostomy, loop colostomy, or end colostomy) created for any indication. Two review authors independently selected eligible studies, extracted data, evaluated the methodological quality of the included studies, and conducted the analyses. The most clinically relevant outcomes were SSI, participant satisfaction, incisional hernia, and operative time. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) for dichotomous data and mean differences (MDs) for continuous data, each with its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). We used the GRADE approach to rate the certainty of the evidence. Nine RCTs involving 757 participants were eligible for inclusion. Eight studies recruited only adults (aged 18 years and older), and one study included people aged 12 years and older. The participants underwent elective reversal of either ileostomy (82%) or colostomy (18%). We considered all studies at high risk of performance and detection bias (lack of blinding) and four studies at unclear risk of selection bias related to random sequence generation. PSSC compared with LSC likely reduces the risk of SSI (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.29; I2 = 0%; 9 studies, 757 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The anticipated absolute risk of SSI is 52 per 1000 people who have PSSC and 243 per 1000 people who have LSC. The likelihood of being very satisfied or satisfied with stoma closure may be higher amongst people who have PSSC compared with people who have LSC (100% vs 89%; OR 20.11, 95% CI 1.09 to 369.88; 2 studies, 122 participants; low-certainty evidence). The results of the analysis suggest that PSSC compared with LSC may have little or no effect on the risk of incisional hernia (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.07 to 3.70; I2 = 49%; 4 studies, 297 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and operative time (MD -2.67 minutes, 95% CI -8.56 to 3.22; I2 = 65%; 6 studies, 460 participants; very low-certainty evidence). PSSC compared with LSC likely reduces the risk of SSI in people undergoing reversal of stoma. People who have PSSC may be more satisfied with the result compared with people who have LSC. There may be little or no difference between the skin closure techniques in terms of incisional hernia and operative time, though the evidence for these two outcomes is very uncertain.

Comparing Surgical Site Infection Rate Between Primary Closure and Rhomboid Flap After Stoma Reversal.

Primary closure (PC) is a common wound closure procedure after stoma reversal and is associated with a high rate of surgical site infection (SSI). This study introduced a new method of skin closure, a rhomboid flap (RF), for skin closure after stoma reversal and compared the SSI rate between the 2 techniques. This is a single-center retrospective study. Patients who underwent colostomy or ileostomy closure performed using either rotation flap (n = 33) or PC (n = 121) techniques for skin closure after stoma reversal between April 2019 and July 2022 were enrolled in this study. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed to obtain data. Both groups were followed up postoperatively at 1 month for wound infection. Wound infection within 30 days after surgery was indicated by the presence of purulent discharge, erythema, local heat, or positive culture for bacteria. In the PC group, the infection rate was 25.6% (n = 121) compared with 12.1% (n = 33) in the RF group (P = 0.158). Among the patients who underwent colostomy reversal, the infection rate of the RF group was significantly lower compared with that of the PC group (11.1% vs 36.9%, P = 0.045). Among the patients who underwent ileostomy reversal, no significant differences in the infection rates between the groups were found (13.3% vs 12.5%, P = 1.000). Although the RF technique requires slightly longer operative time for flap design in practice than the linear closure method, the technique can significantly reduce the SSI rate after colostomy reversal through the dissection of the surrounding inflammatory tissues and obliteration of the dead space. Additional studies are required to evaluate this technique, compare it with other existing methods, and explore long-term complications.

A feasibility survey to inform trial design investigating surgical site infection prevention in vascular surgery

Introduction: Current surgical site infection (SSI) prevention guidance indicates low-quality evidence supporting many of their recommendations. Subsequently, there is substantial variation in practice and often implementation of unsubstantiated interventions. There is therefore a need to rapidly evaluate best practices to prevent SSI. This survey aimed to evaluate current practice in the prevention of SSI and equipoise regarding potential interventions to reduce SSI rates in major lower limb amputation (MLLA) and groin incisions. Methods: A cross-sectional national survey was developed from current international guidelines to prevent SSI, following CHERRIES and CROSS checklists. A study steering committee directed internal validation prior to dissemination via single stage sampling of the membership of the Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Results: The survey received 58 responses from clinicians across 38 NHS trusts. Most respondents were consultant vascular surgeons (91%; 53/58). Preoperatively, there was variable practice in the use of preoperative bathing, surgical site preparation, antibiotic prophylaxis duration and the use of incise drapes for both MLLA and groin incisions. Intraoperatively there was little consensus for wound irrigation, drain insertion, changing gloves and instruments prior to skin closure, skin closure technique, and the use of dressings for both MLLA and groin incisions. The majority of respondents were willing to randomise patients to most interventions. Nearly three-quarters (72%; 42/58) of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that a combined outcome measure of SSI and wound dehiscence would be the ideal primary outcome in a trial investigating SSI prevention in MLLA. Conclusions: Despite significant heterogeneity in practice to prevent SSI, the majority of surgeons surveyed showed they would be willing to randomise to interventions in a randomised controlled trial. This key finding is important in the design of future studies.

#128 : Is Non-Closure Suitable as a Skin Closure Technique for 5 mm Laparoscopic Port-Site? - A Randomised Controlled Trial of Non-Closure Versus Transcutaneous Suture

Background and Aims: Laparoscopy has become the access of choice even in complex abdomino-pelvic surgery cases and more abdominal access ports have been used to assist with the surgery. Systematic review done on skin closure of 5 mm laparoscopic port-site showed comparable outcome between sutured and sutureless technique. Transcutaneous suture is better than subcuticular suture in the sutured group sub-analysis. No RCT were found comparing skin closure versus non-closure technique using simple dressing only. Method: Randomised controlled trial – non superiority in Gynaecology Department, University Malaya Medical Centre in 2019. Based on power calculation, 40 subjects are needed. Each patient act as their own control – each will receive NC and TS for comparison. 40 patients (n=80) were included for final analysis. The 5 mm port site will be assigned with skin closure using NC versus TS where the surgical incision wound is covered with routine dressing after the operation. The primary outcome is the scar appearance at day 90 from the patient and blinded surgeons’ point of view. Secondary outcomes are patient satisfaction and pain at day 14, and wound complications. Results: Cosmetic outcome in terms of scar appearance at day 90 showed no difference between NC and TS rated by the patient (MD 5.25 [0.07, 10.57], p 0.053) and the surgeon (MD 0.88 [0.08, 1.83], p 0.07). Pain is better perceived in NC group (MD 3.6 [0.19, 6.96], p 0.039) and patient satisfaction at day 14 is also better in NC group (MD 11.8 [4.18, 19.33], p 0.03). There was no significant difference in terms of wound complications and no surgical site infection were observed in both groups. Conclusion: NC and TS techniques have comparable cosmetic outcome and wound complications. Pain perception is better in NC than TS.

Complications and influence of cutaneous closure technique on subdermal plexus flaps in 97 dogs (2006-2022).

To determine the incidence and severity of complications for subdermal plexus flaps in dogs and compare the complications when using sutures or staples for cutaneous closure of subdermal plexus flaps. Retrospective monocentric study. Ninety-seven client-owned dogs. Dogs that underwent wound reconstruction using subdermal plexus flaps were retrospectively identified. Type of flap, cutaneous closure technique, complications and level of complication associated with their use were recorded. Follow-up was considered adequate if it was more than 10 days postoperatively or until a complication occurred. Complications were seen in 52 dogs (53.6%), of which 13/18 (72.2%) of dogs had cutaneous closure with skin staples versus 39/79 (49.3%) with skin sutures. The location of the mass/wound on the head and use of an advancement flap was associated with lower incidence of complications (p < .001; p = .018 respectively). Location of the mass/wound on the proximal pelvic limb was associated with a low level of complications (p = .01) on univariable analysis only. On multivariable analysis, only an increased bodyweight was associated with an increased incidence of complications (p = .029). Increased weight may be associated with an increased risk of complications with subdermal plexus flaps. No risk factor was found to be associated with the severity of complications. Overall incidence of complications for subdermal plexus flaps in dogs in this study was 53.6%. The number of dogs included in the study was not sufficient to assess if the skin closure technique affects the incidence of complications.

The Outcome of Purse-string Versus Conventional Wound Closure Techniques in Patients Undergoing Stoma Reversal: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundPatients undergoing stoma reversal may experience surgical site infections and poor scarring. A purse-string closure approach may lower the incidence of surgical site infections due to its inherent ability to drain wound exudates. This study compared the frequency of surgical site infections and the cosmetic outlook of the scar among patients undergoing stoma reversal with linear and purse-string skin closure techniques. Setting and durationDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, University of Child Health Sciences Lahore with a duration of one year (June 2021 to June 2022). MethodsThis randomized controlled trial (TCTR20210417001) was conducted with IRB approval. A total of 124 patients undergoing stoma reversal were randomly assigned to two groups (62 in each): Group A received conventional linear skin closure, while Group B received purse-string wound closure. The study evaluated surgical site infection, cosmetic outcome, and length of stay. ResultsBoth groups had similar age, gender ratio, indication for surgery, and length of stay. The purse-string group had a significantly lower incidence of SSI (38.7 % vs. 14.5 %; p = 0.002) and better scar quality (Manchester scar scale showed 'good' scar quality in 63 % of patients vs. 22.6 % in the linear closure group, p-value <0.0001). ConclusionThe purse-string technique for skin closure resulted in fewer surgical site infections and improved scar appearance.

Comparison of tensile strength of skin closure by simple interrupted, simple continuous, and staples

Background: Objective of the study was to compare tensile strength and time taken for wound closure using simple interrupted sutures, simple continuous sutures, and staples sutures. Methods: Swine skin tissue was cut into pieces of 2×6 cm and were divided into 3 groups according to skin closure technique: simple interrupted sutures (Nylon 5-0), simple continuous sutures (Nylon 5-0), and staples suture. All sutures, three equal knots in one piece, were performed by a single surgeon. Time taken for the approximation of each sample was recorded in second (S). Tensile strength was measured in newton unit (N) by pulling apart until suture separation using a tensiometer. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and subgroup analysis using Bonferroni correction was used to determine differences between groups. Results: Of 190 total pairs of skin tissue, the mean±SD times for skin approximation were 144.86±22.67 s for simple interrupted sutures, 96.19±17.64 s for simple continuous sutures, and 12.90±3.18 s for staples sutures (p&lt;0.001). The corresponding mean±SD of maximum tensile strengths in each group were 29.04±10.72 N, 18.85±5.45 N, and 56.41±19.56 N, respectively (p&lt;0.001). Conclusions: Our study showed that the use of staples for skin approximation took the least operative time and achieved the highest maximum tensile strength.

Treatment and Improvement of Healing after Surgical Intervention.

The development of abnormal scars has a great impact on people's well-being, and improving scarring outcomes after surgery is a field that currently lacks consensus. This review aims to identify newly researched approaches to improving the quality of surgical scars. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect was conducted between 13 May 2023 and 17 May 2023, in accordance with the recommendations of the PRISMA Statement. Study selection and analysis of methodological quality were performed in parts, independently and blindly, based on eligibility criteria. The 21 prospective, comparative, and randomized studies reviewed included 1057 subjects and studied approaches such as topical applications of creams with herbal extracts and silicone gels, growth factors, negative pressure dressings, oligonucleotides, intralesional injection of compounds such as botulinum toxin, skin closure techniques such as suturing and tissue adhesive, and laser treatments. There are recent research techniques that generate good results and are really promising to improve the results of surgical scars; however, the available evidence is extremely limited in some cases, and it is necessary to deepen its analysis to obtain reliable action protocols in each type of surgery.

Risk factors for surgical site infections and trends in skin closure technique after diverting loop ileostomy reversal: A multi-institutional analysis

BackgroundSurgical site infections (SSIs) are one of the most common complications following diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) closures. This study assesses SSIs after DLI closure and the temporal trends in skin closure technique. MethodsA retrospective review was conducted using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for adult patients who underwent a DLI closure between 2012 and 2021 across a multistate health system. Skin closure technique was categorized as primary, primary ​+ ​drain, or purse-string closure. The primary outcome was SSI at the former DLI site. ResultsA SSI was diagnosed in 5.7% of patients; 6.9% for primary closure, 5.7% for primary closure ​+ ​drain, and 2.7% for purse-string closure (p ​= ​0.25). A diagnosis of Crohn's disease, diverticular disease, and increasing operative time were significant risk factors for SSIs. There was a positive trend in the use of purse-string closure over time (p ​< ​0.0001). ConclusionsThis study identified a low SSI rate after DLI closure which did not vary significantly based on skin closure technique. Utilization of purse-string closure increased over time.

Evaluation of oblique mattress suturing technique for skin closure in carpal tunnel syndrome surgery

Evaluation of oblique mattress suturing technique for skin closure in carpal tunnel syndrome surgery

Comparison between micro-anchor skin dressing and liquid bonding agent for elective knee arthroscopy portal closure.

The objective of the current study was to evaluate outcomes of elective knee arthroscopy portal closure comparing two skin closure techniques. This was a randomised controlled trial including healthy volunteers aged ≥18 years undergoing elective knee arthroscopy that used two portals. At the time of surgery, each patient's two arthroscopy portal closures were randomised to one of two closure techniques; the first technique used approximation of the skin with a micro-anchor skin dressing (BandGrip Inc., US), while the second closure technique used an absorbable suture (Biosyn Monofilament, Medtronic) and a liquid bonding agent skin closure (Dermabond, Ethicon Inc., US). Postoperative complications and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated at the first visit after knee arthroscopy and at six weeks postoperatively. A total of 38 patients (76 portals) were enrolled in this study. No patients reported wound complications of either portal; thus, there was no significant difference (p>0.05) in wound complication rates between the skin closure techniques. Survey questions regarding any difference in appearance and cosmesis between the closure techniques' portal sites were responded to by 15 patients, all of whom indicated no difference in appearance between the portal sites. There was also no statistically significant difference between the two closure techniques with regards to appearance. There was no significant difference in presence of wound complications or appearance between skin closure with the micro-anchor skin dressing and the absorbable suture/liquid bonding agent skin closure.

Wound Complications Are Affected by Different Skin Closure Methods in Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundThere is a lack of consensus on optimal skin closure and dressing strategies to reduce early wound complication rates after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MethodsAll 13,271 patients at low risk for wound complications undergoing primary, unilateral THA (7,816), and TKA (5,455) for idiopathic osteoarthritis at our institution between August 2016 and July 2021 were identified. Skin closure, dressing type, and postoperative events related to wound complications were recorded during the first 30 postoperative days. ResultsThe need for unscheduled office visits to address wound complications was more frequent after TKA than THA (2.74 versus 1.78%, P < .001), and after direct anterior versus posterior approach THA (2.94 versus 1.39%, P < .001). Patients who developed a wound complication, had a mean of 2.9 additional office visits. Compared to the use of topical adhesives, skin closure with staples had the highest risk of wound complications (odds ratio 1.8 [1.07-3.11], P = .028). Topical adhesives with polyester mesh had higher rates of allergic contact dermatitis than topical adhesives without mesh (1.4 versus 0.5%, P < .0001). ConclusionWound complications after primary THA and TKA were often self-limited but increased burden on the patient, surgeon, and care team. These data, which suggest different rates of certain complications with different skin closure strategies, can inform a surgeon on optimal closure methods in their practice. Adoption of the skin closure technique with the lowest risk of complications in our hospital would conservatively result in a reduction of 95 unscheduled office visits and save a projected $585,678 annually.

A prospective study on vertical mattress suture and subcuticular suture skin closure techniques in inguinal hernia repair cases

Background: Sutures are used to keep tissues in place until enough healing has taken place to produce endogenous wound strength. The method of closure should be quick, simple, affordable, and successful while maximizing the cosmetic of the wound and patient outcomes. So, this study was an attempt to compare subcuticular and vertical mattress suture techniques in inguinal hernia repair. Methods: A prospective study was carried out among patients posted for inguinal hernia repair. The wound closure of the first 25 patients was done using a subcuticular suture and another by classical vertical mattress suture. Duration required for wound closure, complications, postoperative pain and cosmesis were assessed and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: The duration required for wound closure was higher in the subcuticular suture compared with the classical vertical mattress suture. There was no significant difference in post-operative pain, wound complications and wound cosmesis in both groups. Conclusions: Among cases with inguinal hernia repair there was no superiority in subcuticular and classical vertical mattress sutures from the patient side.

Primary versus secondary closure of stoma reversal skin wound: Randomized controlled trial.

To compare the efficacy of primary versus secondary closure of stoma reversal skin wound in terms of wound infection. The study was conducted at Surgical B Unit of Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan, from January 1 to December 31, 2020, and comprised adult patients of either gender undergoing stoma reversal. The patients were randomised into primary closure group A and secondary closure group B. Surgical procedure was similar in both the groups except the skin closure technique. In group A, skin was closed with interrupted polypropylene sutures, while in group B, wound was dressed with saline-soaked gauze daily using aseptic technique and was allowed to heal by secondary intention or delayed primary closure later on. Postoperatively, the wound was assessed for infection till 30th postoperative day or complete wound healing. Data was analysed using SPSS 16. Of the 50 patients, 35(70%) were males and 15(30%) were females. The overall mean age was 28±1.65years. There were 25(50%) patients in each of the two groups. There were 19(76%) males and 6(24%) females in group A with a mean age of 32±2.8years. There were 16(64%) males and 9(36%) females in group B with a mean age of 23±3.5years. Overall, 10(20%) patients had wound-site infections; 9(36%) in group A versus 1(4%) in group B (p=0.005). Frequency of wound infection with respect to gender, type of stoma and length of hospital stay was not significant (p>0.05). Secondary skin closure was found to be associated with significantly reduced wound infection rate after stoma reversal. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04785404.

Non-Suture Skin Closure Technique for Cesarean Section as an Alternative to Usual Methods

Non-Suture Skin Closure Technique for Cesarean Section as an Alternative to Usual Methods