Technique For Screw Placement Research Articles

Posterior Cervical Fixation:Indications, Fixation Methods, and Surgical Safety

It is important to be aware of the indications, surgical procedure selection, and associated complications. This chapter focuses on basic screw placement techniques, emphasizing on safety with each anchor placement. Familiarity with managing surgical accidents is also important. After learning the fundamental methods for placing anchors in posterior cervical fixation, surgeons should proceed stepwise to more complex fixation procedures.

Practice Pattern Variations in the Use of Neuromonitoring, Image Guidance, and Robotics for Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement Based on a Nationwide Neurosurgery Survey

Lumbar pedicle screw placement surgery involves various assistive technologies, including fluoroscopic, stereotactic, or robotic navigation and intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM). We aimed to discern neurosurgeons' preferences for screw placement techniques and IONM utility, while also considering the influence of experience. A survey was distributed to members of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons using REDCap software, collecting demographic data and querying preferred techniques for screw placement and IONM modalities. Opinions on IONM use during stereotactic or robotic navigation were also obtained. Responses were analyzed using Pearson's Chi-square and analysis of variance tests via R software. Of 188 responses, 35.5% (n= 67) reported 1-10years of experience and 64.5% (n= 121) reported ≥ 11years. Less experienced neurosurgeons used stereotactic navigation more than those with greater experience (P < 0.001). Seasoned neurosurgeons used fluoroscopic guidance more often (P= 0.038). Less experienced neurosurgeons employed 1.69 (± 0.11) techniques for their fixation surgeries compared to 1.50 (± 0.0.8) for more experienced neurosurgeons. Robotic navigation utilization was low and comparable between the groups. Surgeons employing multiple techniques used triggered electromyography the most (62.1%, P= 0.024). No strong opinions emerged on the necessity of multimodality IONM with robotic or stereotactic navigation. This national survey shows that stereotactic navigation is the predominant technique for pedicle screw placement among less experienced neurosurgeons, with seasoned neurosurgeons leaning toward fluoroscopic guidance. Robotic guidance was the least used technique with no observed difference based on experience. Neurosurgeons employing multiple techniques use IONM the most, compared with surgeons who only use stereotactic navigation and/or robotic guidance.

Current research status and prospects for clinical application of robotics in spinal surgery

With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence and the increasing integration of medical engineering, robot-assisted (RA) technology in spinal surgery has made significant strides, with its clinical application range continuously expanding. This article provides a comprehensive review of relevant literature on spinal surgery robots over the past decade, summarizing recent advancements in screw placement techniques such as cervical, thoracic, and lumbar pedicle screws; cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws; cervical lateral mass screws; and S2 sacroiliac (S2AI) screws. It also discusses RA-guided targeted puncture and endoscope placement through intervertebral foramen as well as decompressive laminectomy procedures. Furthermore, this article systematically analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of RA technology while elucidating its accuracy, safety, and practicality. We believe that this article will help clinicians to gain a deeper understanding of the current clinical application status of spinal surgery robots while promoting further enhancements and wider adoption of RA technology to ultimately benefit more patients.

Analysis of the accuracy between orthopedic robot-assisted and traditional manual pedicle screw placement techniques in adult degenerative scoliosis posterior surgery

Objective: To comparing the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in posterior surgery for adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) between robotic-assisted and traditional freehand techniques. Methods: This retrospective study included 92 patients with ADS who underwent posterior spinal surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Jiangsu Province Hospital) between March 2019 and December 2023. There were 19 males and 73 females with a mean age of (63.6±9.8) years. The patients were divided into two groups based on the technique used for pedicle screw placement: robot-assisted group (34 cases) and manual group (58 cases). Operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, facet joint violation, postoperative complications, magnitude of curve correction, visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores preoperatively, 1 week postoperatively, and 1 month postoperatively were compared and analyzed between the two groups. The Gertzbein-Robbins classification criteria was used to assess the accuracy of screw placement. Results: Differences in baseline data, operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, magnitude of curve correction, and VAS and ODI scores preoperatively, 1 week postoperatively, and 1 month postoperatively between the two groups exhibited no statistically significant differences (all P>0.05). The accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the robot-assisted group was significantly higher than that in the manual group [90.9% (416/458) vs 80.1% (697/870), P<0.001]. In terms of surgical segments, in T1-T12 and L1-S1 segments, the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the robot group were both significantly higher than those in the control group [91.5% (130/142) vs 77.8% (186/239), P=0.001; 90.3% (271/300) vs 80.8% (502/621), P<0.001]. However, no significant differences was observed in the accuracy of S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screw placement between the two groups [90.0%(9/10) vs 93.8%(15/16), P=0.727]. Moreover, no significant differences was found in the deviation direction of the cortical screw penetration between both groups (P=0.133). Significant differences were observed in the accuracy of screw placement between the Nash Moe 2 and 3 vertebral bodies in the robot group compared with those in the control group [88.9% (88/99) vs 71.0% (115/162), P=0.001; 89.2% (83/93) vs 60.2% (68/113), P<0.001]. Additionally, the incidence and grade of facet joint violation in the manual group were both significantly higher than those in the robot-assisted group (both P<0.001). No statistically significant differences was identified in postoperative complications between the two groups (P=0.841). Conclusion: It suggests that robot-assisted pedicle screw placement in posterior surgery for patients with ADS can significantly improve the accuracy of screw placement and reduce the incidence of facet joint violation.

Experiences with the infra-acetabular screw placement technique in acetabular fracture surgery

To investigate the application experiences and effectiveness of the infra-acetabular screw (IAS) placement technique in acetabular fracture surgery. A clinical data of 34 patients with complex acetabular fractures with anterior and posterior columns separation, who were admitted between January 2019 and October 2023 and treated with IAS fixation, was retrospectively analyzed. There were 23 males and 11 females with an average age of 55.3 years (range, 18-78 years). The acetabular fractures caused by traffic accident in 20 cases, falling from height in 12 cases, crushing injury in 1 case, and bruising with a heavy object in 1 case. According to the Letournel-Judet classification, there were 7 cases of anterior column fracture, 8 cases of anterior wall/column plus posterior hemi-transverse fracture, 2 cases of T-shaped fracture, and 17 cases of both-column fracture. The time from injury to surgery was 4-21 days (mean, 8.6 days). The time of IAS placement and the intraoperative blood loss were recorded. After surgery, the X-ray film and CT scan were re-examined, and the modified Matta score was used to assess the quality of fracture reduction. The trajectory of IAS in the channel was analyzed based on CT scan, and the screw length was measured. During follow-up, the fracture healing was observed and the hip function was assessed according to the modified Merle d'Aubigné-Postel scoring system at last follow-up. The IAS was successfully implanted in all 34 patients. The length of IAS ranged from 70 to 100 mm (mean, 86.2 mm). The time of IAS placement ranged from 10 to 40 minutes (mean, 20.7 minutes). The intraoperative blood loss ranged from 520 to 820 mL (mean, 716.8 mL). All patients were followed up 8-62 months (mean, 21.8 months). After surgery, 4 patients developed lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury, 2 developed popliteal vein thrombosis of the lower extremity, 3 developed incision infection, and no surgical complication such as arteriovenous injury or obturator nerve palsy occurred. At last follow-up, the hip function was rated as excellent in 14 cases, good in 13 cases, fair in 4 cases, and poor in 3 cases according to the Merle d'Aubigné-Postel scoring system, with an excellent and good rate of 79.41%. Imaging re-examined showed that the quality of fracture reduction was rated as excellent in 9 cases, good in 19 cases, and poor in 6 cases according to the modified Matta score, with an excellent and good rate of 82.35%; and 25 (73.53%) IAS trajectories were located in the channel. All fractures obtained bony union, and the healing time was 12-24 weeks (mean, 18 weeks). During follow-up, there was no loosening or fracture of the plate and screws. IAS placement technique can effectively strengthen internal fixation and prevent fracture re-displacement, making it a useful adjunct for treating complex acetabular fractures with anterior and posterior columns separation.

Technique, Safety, and Accuracy Assessment of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement Utilizing Computer-Assisted Navigation in Lateral Decubitus Single-Position Surgery.

Percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) placement has become a pivotal technique in spinal surgery, increasing surgical efficiency and limiting the invasiveness of surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to analyze the accuracy of computer-assisted PPS placement with a standardized technique in the lateral decubitus position. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed on 44 consecutive patients treated between 2021 and 2023 with lateral decubitus single-position surgery. PPS placement was assessed by computed tomography scans, and breaches were graded based on the magnitude and direction of the breach. Facet joint violations were assessed. Variables collected included patient demographics, indication, intraoperative complications, operative time, fluoroscopy time, estimated blood loss, and length of stay. Forty-four patients, with 220 PPSs were identified. About 79.5% of all patients underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion only, 13.6% underwent lateral lumbar interbody fusion only, and 6.8% received a combination of both anterior lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Eleven screw breaches (5%) were identified: 10 were Grade II breaches (<2 mm), and 1 was a Grade IV breach (>4 mm). All breaches were lateral. About 63.6% involved down-side screws indicating a trend toward the laterality of breaches for down-side pedicles. When analyzing breaches by level, 1.2% of screws at L5, 13% at L4, and 11.1% at L3 demonstrated Grade II breaches. No facet joint violations were noted. PPS placement utilizing computer-assisted navigation in lateral decubitus single-position surgery is both safe and accurate. An overall breach rate of 5% was found; considering a safe zone of 2 mm, only 1 screw (0.5%) demonstrated a relevant breach. PPS placement is both safe and accurate. Breaches are rare, and when breaches do occur, they are lateral.

Types of high-riding vertebral artery: a classification system for preoperative planning of C2 instrumentation based on 908 potential screw insertion sites

BACKGROUND CONTEXTOur recent studies indicated that a high-riding vertebral artery (HRVA) is a common variant posing a risk of injuring the vessel during C2 instrumentation. However, several different types fit in the current definition of HRVA, which may require a different strategy for C2 screw placement. PURPOSETo classify HRVA and provide a clinical aid for preoperative planning of C2 instrumentation. A secondary goal was to estimate coexistence of each HRVA type with the ipsilateral narrow C2 pedicle (NP). STUDY DESIGNA retrospective observational study involving radiologic measurements of the estimated number of anonymized cervical computed tomography (CT) scans. STROBE checklist was applied. PATIENT SAMPLEA total of 908 potential screw insertion sites (PSIS) of 454 consecutive cervical CT scans were analyzed. The sample size was estimated using ScalaR SP function in RStudio. OUTCOME MEASURESThree types of HRVA based on a series of C2 vertebral morphological parameters including the C2 isthmus height (C2IsH) and C2 internal height (C2InH). Also, the prevalences of each HRVA type and coexisting NP based on the C2 pedicle width (C2PW). METHODSHRVA was defined as C2IsH of ≤5 mm and/or C2InH of ≤2 mm measured 3 mm lateral to the lateral border of the spinal canal. A narrow pedicle was defined as C2PW of ≤4 mm. Measurements were done using Syn.govia software. Interobserver, intraobserver, and inter-software agreement coefficients for C2IsH, C2InH, and C2PW parameters were adopted from our previous study. K-means cluster analysis was applied. RESULTSPrevalence of at least 1 HRVA was 24.9% (n=113 subjects) and 16.2% of PSIS (n=147 sites). Based on the measurements and K-means clustering, the following 3 types of HRVA have been distinguished: type 1—isthmic with only C2IsH being reduced and normal C2InH; type 2—internal with only C2InH being reduced and C2IsH within normal limits; type 3—isthmo-internal with both C2IsH and C2InH being reduced. Kruskal-Wallis test followed by unadjusted and Bonferroni-adjusted post-hoc multiple comparison analysis detected significant differences across the types. The prevalences of the newly identified types were as follows: 78.2%, 8.8%, and 12.9% for type 1, type 2, and type 3, respectively. 73.9% of type 1 HRVA, 53.8% of type 2 HRVA, and 100% of type 3 HRVA had a concomitant ipsilateral NP. Prediction of the HRVA types by the K-means clustering has been evaluated. Screw placement techniques for each type are proposed and discussed. CONCLUSIONWe present the first classification system for the high-riding vertebral artery distinguishing 3 types based on the large homogenous cohort, which may serve as an adjunct to preoperative planning of C2 instrumentation. External validation of this classification scheme shall determine its further clinical utility.

A Network Meta-Analysis Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Pedicle Screw Placement Techniques Using Intraoperative Conventional, Navigation, Robot-Assisted, and Augmented Reality Guiding Systems.

Studies were reviewed and collected to compare different image guidance systems for pedicle screw placement (PSP) regarding accuracy and safety outcomes. Included were conventional, navigation, robot-assisted, and recent technology such as augmented reality (AR) guiding systems. This network meta-analysis obtained human comparative studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding PSP found in 3 databases (Cochrane, PubMed, and Scopus). Data extraction for accuracy, safety, and clinical outcomes were collected. The network meta-analysis was analyzed, and a surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to rank the treatment for all outcomes. The final 61 studies, including 13 RCTs and 48 non-RCTs, were included in the meta-analysis. These studies included a total of 17,023 patients and 35,451 pedicle screws. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve ranking demonstrated the supremacy of robotics in almost all accuracy outcomes except for the facet joint violation. Regarding perfect placement, the risk difference for AR was 19.1 (95% CI: 8.1-30.1), which was significantly higher than the conventional method. The robot-assisted and navigation systems had improved outcomes but were not significantly different in accuracy vs the conventional technique. There was no statistically significant difference concerning safety or clinical outcomes. The accuracy of PSP achieved by robot-assisted technology was the highest, whereas the safety and clinical outcomes of the different methods were comparable. The recent AR technique provided better accuracy compared with navigation and conventional methods.

Analysis of the therapeutic efficacy of robot-assisted percutaneous screw fixation in the minimally invasive treatment of pelvic fractures.

To compare the therapeutic efficacy of robot-assisted and manual screw placement techniques for the treatment of pelvic fractures. This study included patients with pelvic fractures admitted to our orthopedic department between January 2020 and January 2022. They were randomly assigned to either the robot-assisted group or the control group. Various parameters, including surgical duration, intraoperative bleeding, fluoroscopy frequency, postoperative pain, length of hospitalization, postoperative hematological indices, postoperative functional scores, and postoperative complications, were compared between the two groups. There were no significant differences in age, sex, body mass index, and preoperative hematological parameters between the two groups. The robot-assisted group exhibited significantly shorter surgical duration, lower fluoroscopy frequencies, lower postoperative pain scores, and shorter length of hospitalization compared to the control group. At 3 and 6 months postoperatively, patients in the robot-assisted group demonstrated significantly higher Majeed functional scores in comparison to the control group. However, there were no significant differences in Majeed scores at 12 months postoperatively. Moreover, there were no significant differences in postoperative complications between the two groups. Robot-assisted minimally invasive treatment of pelvic fractures using hollow screws effectively reduced surgical duration, mitigated intraoperative bleeding and postoperative pain, shortened hospital stays, and promoted faster functional recovery.

Fluoroscopy guided teardrop technique for open trans-muscular iliac screw placement and open reduction maneuvers during modified triangular spinopelvic fixation for unstable U-shaped sacral and tile C pelvic traumas: technical note.

Unstable traumas of the spinopelvic junction, which include displaced U-shaped sacral fractures (Roy-Camille type 2 and type 3) and Tile C vertical shear pelvic ring disruptions, occur in severe traumas patients following high speed traffic accident or fall from a height. These unstable traumas of the spinopelvic junction jeopardize one's ability to stand and to walk by disrupting the biomechanical arches of the pelvis, and may also cause cauda equina syndrome. Historically, such patients were treated with bed rest and could suffer a life-long burden of orthopedic and neurological disability. Since Schildhauer pioneer work back in 2003, triangular spinopelvic fixation, whether it is performed in a percutaneous fashion or by open reduction and internal fixation, allows to realign bone fragments of the spinopelvic junction and to resume walking within three weeks. Nevertheless, such procedure remains highly technical and it not encountered very often, even for spine surgeons working in high-volume level 1 trauma centers. Hence, this visual technical note aims to provide a few tips to guide less experience surgeons to complete this procedure safely.

Comparative evaluation of postoperative outcomes and expenditure between robotic and conventional single-level lumbar fusion surgery: a comprehensive analysis of nationwide inpatient sample data

IntroductionIn this study, we investigate the evolution of lumbar fusion surgery with robotic assistance, specifically focusing on the impact of robotic technology on pedicle screw placement and fixation. Utilizing data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) covering 2016 to 2019, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of postoperative outcomes and costs for single-level lumbar fusion surgery. Traditionally, freehand techniques for pedicle screw placement posed risks, leading to the development of robotic-assisted techniques with advantages such as reduced misplacement, increased precision, smaller incisions, and decreased surgeon fatigue. However, conflicting study results regarding the efficacy of robotic assistance in comparison to conventional techniques have prompted the need for a thorough evaluation. With a dataset of 461,965 patients, our aim is to provide insights into the impact of robotic assistance on patient care and healthcare resource utilization. Our primary goal is to contribute to the ongoing discourse on the efficacy of robotic technology in lumbar fusion procedures, offering meaningful insights for optimizing patient-centered care and healthcare resource allocation.MethodsThis study employed data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) spanning the years 2016 to 2019 from USA, 461,965 patients underwent one-level lumbar fusion surgery, with 5770 of them having the surgery with the assistance of robotic technology. The study focused primarily on one-level lumbar fusion surgery and excluded non-elective cases and those with prior surgeries. The analysis encompassed the identification of comorbidities, surgical etiologies, and complications using specific ICD-10 codes. Throughout the study, a constant comparison was made between robotic and non-robotic lumbar fusion procedures. Various statistical methods were applied, with a p value threshold of < 0.05, to determine statistical significance.ResultsRobotic-assisted lumbar fusion surgeries demonstrated a significant increase from 2016 to 2019, comprising 1.25% of cases. Both groups exhibited similar patient demographics, with minor differences in payment methods, favoring Medicare in non-robotic surgery and more private payer usage in robotic surgery. A comparison of comorbid conditions revealed differences in the prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and sleep apnea diagnoses—In terms of hospitalization outcomes and costs, there was a slight shorter hospital stay of 3.06 days, compared to 3.13 days in non-robotic surgery, showcasing a statistically significant difference (p = 0.042). Robotic surgery has higher charges, with a mean charge of $154,673, whereas non-robotic surgery had a mean charge of $125,467 (p < 0.0001). Robotic surgery demonstrated lower rates of heart failure, acute coronary artery disease, pulmonary edema, venous thromboembolism, and traumatic spinal injury compared to non-robotic surgery, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). Conversely, robotic surgery demonstrated increased post-surgery anemia and blood transfusion requirements compared to non-robotic patients (p < 0.0001). Renal disease prevalence was similar before surgery, but acute kidney injury was slightly higher in the robotic group post-surgery (p = 0.038).ConclusionThis is the first big data study on this matter, our study showed that Robotic-assisted lumbar fusion surgery has fewer post-operative complications such as heart failure, acute coronary artery disease, pulmonary edema, venous thromboembolism, and traumatic spinal injury in comparison to conventional methods. Conversely, robotic surgery demonstrated increased post-surgery anemia, blood transfusion and acute kidney injury. Robotic surgery has higher charges compared to non-robotic surgery.

Consistent anatomical relationships of pedicle, lamina, and superior articulating process in severe idiopathic scoliosis allow for safe freehand pedicle screw placement: A proof-of-concept technical study.

Transpedicular screw placement has superior pullout strength compared to alternative forms of spinal fusion and is often performed in deformity correction surgery with navigation for optimal accuracy and reliability. Freehand technique for pedicle screws minimizes operation time and radiation exposure without fluoroscopy but is not widely adopted given the challenge of difficult anatomical corridors and accurate placement, especially in idiopathic scoliosis and advanced deformity. We used a computer-generated model to assess a proof-of-concept and anatomical feasibility of a freehand screw technique in severe scoliosis. Three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions of vertebra from a sample of two male patients with severe idiopathic scoliosis deformity (1 thoracic and 1 lumbar) with Cobb angles of 100° were used for planned placement of 17 levels of thoracolumbar (6.5 mm × 45 mm) pedicle screws. 3D reconstruction of each vertebra was created and measurements of screw entries and trajectories were reproduced with a 3D slicer software image computing platform. Accurate transpedicular screw placement is possible with anatomical landmarks based on the 3D reconstructed vertebral levels. A series of 5 figures were assembled to demonstrate sagittal, coronal, and axial planes and key anatomical landmarks and trajectories of thoracic and lumbar freehand pedicle screws in severe idiopathic scoliosis. Anatomical landmarks for freehand transpedicular screw placement (between pedicle, lamina, and superior articulating process) are constant and reliable in severe idiopathic scoliosis as evidenced by 3D computer modeling. Preoperative computed tomography modeling may assist appropriate screw entry and trajectory based on anatomical landmarks for spine surgeons, and guide freehand technique for screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Surgical stabilization for degenerative lesions of the lumbar spine in patients with reduced bone mineral density: a systematic literature review

Objective. To analyze methods contributing to the improvement of clinical and radiological outcomes of surgical stabilization of the lumbar spine in conditions of reduced bone mineral density (BMD).Material and Methods. A search for publications presenting the results of clinical studies of surgical treatment of patients with degenerative lesions of the lumbar spine and reduced BMD was conducted in English and Russian in the MEDLINE and Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI) databases using key words “osteoporosis”, “osteopenia”, “spinal surgery”, “spinal fusion” and related terms in titles and abstracts with a search depth of 20 years. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 17 clinical studies were selected for analysis.Results. Among the large number of techniques and implant-associated factors affecting the success of surgical intervention for degenerative lesions of the lumbar spine and reduced BMD, high-quality clinical studies have proven the effectiveness of expandable screws, spinal fusion with cortical screw placement and cement augmentation with polymethyl methacrylate.Conclusion. The combination of techniques for cortical pedicle screw placement, cement augmentation and the use of expandable screws makes it possible to achieve results in surgical treatment of patients with degenerative lesions of the lumbar spine with reduced BMD comparable with those in patients with normal BMD. Of particular importance is the preoperative assessment of the regional state of bone tissue, which should be carried out using quantitative CT or MRI studies.

Fluroscopy-assisted transiliac antegrade lag screw placement technique in both columns of acetabulum: A novel procedure

The use of pelvic osseous fixation corridors and lag screw fixation in acetabular and pelvic surgery has gained popularity, especially with the recent development of intraoperative imaging and navigation techniques. However, advanced intraoperative imaging and navigation techniques require technical equipment and are costly. Therefore, traditional fluoroscopic techniques still maintain their importance. In this article, we describe a novel pelvic osseous fixation corridor that traverses both columns of the acetabulum, along with the detailed methodology of its fluoroscopic imaging and the techniques for fluoroscopy-assisted screw placement. The technique of placing screws in this current fixation corridor is only under fluoroscopy assistance, without using any specially produced guide or navigation device. Level of proofIV.

Modified Tap-drilling Technique for Mid-cervical Pedicle Screw Placement: A Case Series of 473 Consecutive Screws.

Retrospective cohort study. To report our modified tap-drilling technique for mid-cervical pedicle screw placement and to evaluate its safety and accuracy. Cervical pedicle screw fixation, which provides a strong stabilization, has been a major concern due to the potential risks to neurovascular structures despite its increasing use. Several insertion techniques have been described so far to improve the cervical pedicle screw placement accuracy. This study retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent mid-cervical (C3-C6) pedicle screw fixation between September 2005 and September 2020. Laminectomy, laminoforaminotomy, or notch-referred anatomic landmark methods were used to adjust the entry point and the direction of the screws. After the cortical bone was removed at the entry point with a diamond burr, the cancellous bone was slowly drilled with a hand drill starting from 8 to 10 millimeters in length. Then, all of the bone walls were checked with a ball-tip probe to determine if there was any breach. The procedure was repeated several times. After completing the drilling, the screw was inserted without tapping. The breach rate of pedicle screws was analyzed on postoperative computed tomography scans. A total of 473 mid-cervical pedicle screws were placed in 122 consecutive patients. No navigation or computer-assisted system was used, and the first 2 authors inserted all of the screws. All patients completed the surgery, and no evident intraoperative complications occurred. Postoperative CT scans were obtained for 405 screws. Although deviation was observed for 131 pedicle screws, a critical deviation was observed for only 25 pedicle screws. Cervical pedicle screw insertion is a risky but applicable technique. Checking all of the bone walls with a ball-tip probe before gradually advancing the hand drill in small amounts, as presented in this article, may lead to the safe and effective placement of cervical pedicle screws.

Comparison of rehabilitation outcomes between robot-assisted and freehand screw placement in treatment of femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PurposeTo compare the postoperative rehabilitation of femoral neck fractures treated with robot-assisted nailing and freehand nailing.MethodsWe systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI), WanFang database, China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP) and Web of Science databases to identify potentially eligible articles. Indispensable data such as the year of publication, country, study type, robot type, age, number of patients, sex distribution, study design, and outcome indicators were extracted. The outcome indicators of interest included healing rate, length of healing time, Harris score, operation time, frequency of X-ray fluoroscopy, frequency of guide pin insertion, and intraoperative blood loss. RevMan 5.4.1 was used for the meta-analysis.ResultsFourteen studies with 908 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that in terms of healing rate (SMD = 2.75, 95% CI, 1.03 to 7.32, P = 0.04) and Harris score (SMD = 2.27, 95% CI, 0.79 to 3.75, P = 0.003), robot-assisted screw placement technique scores were higher than the traditional freehand technique. Additionally, operative time (SMD = -12.72, 95% CI, -19.74 to -5.70, P = 0.0004), healing time (SMD = -13.63, 95% CI, -20.18 to -7.08, P < 0.0001), frequency of X-ray fluoroscopy (SMD = − 13.64, 95% CI, − 18.32 to − 8.95, P < 0.00001), frequency of guide pin insertion (SMD = − 7.95, 95% CI, − 10.13 to − 5.76, P < 0.00001), and intraoperative blood loss (SMD = − 17.33, 95% CI, − 23.66 to − 11.00, P < 0.00001) were lower for patients who underwent robotic-assisted screw placement than those for patients who underwent the conventional freehand technique.ConclusionCompared to the freehand nailing technique, robot-assisted nailing helps improve postoperative healing rates in patients with femoral neck fractures; shortens healing times; better restores hip function; reduces the number of intraoperative fluoroscopies, guides pin placements; reduces intraoperative bleeding; and increases perioperative safety.

Technique, safety and accuracy assessment of percutaneous pedicle screw placement utilizing computer assisted navigation in lateral decubitus single-position surgery

Technique, safety and accuracy assessment of percutaneous pedicle screw placement utilizing computer assisted navigation in lateral decubitus single-position surgery

3D-printed guides versus computer navigation for pedicle screw placement in the surgical treatment of congenital scoliosis deformities.

To compare the safety and clinical outcomes of 3D-printed guides versus computer navigation for pedicle screw placement in the correction of congenital scoliosis deformities. The study was a single-centre retrospective controlled study and was approved by the hospital ethics committee for the analysis all patients under the age of 18years with at least 2years of follow-up. Sixty-three patients who underwent surgical correction for congenital scoliosis deformities in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2020 were divided into two groups based on the decision following preoperative doctor‒patient communication. Among them, 43 patients had pedicle screws placed with 3D-printed guider plates, while the remaining 20 patients had screws inserted with the assistance of computer navigation. The perioperative period, follow-up results and imaging data were compared between the groups. The operation was completed successfully for patients in both groups. The 3D-printed guide-assisted screw placement technique proved to be significantly superior to the computer navigation technique in terms of operation time, screw placement time, and intraoperative blood loss (p < .05), although the former had more frequent intraoperative fluoroscopies than the latter (p < .05). The mean follow-up time was 41.4months, and the SRS-22 scores significantly improved in both groups over time postoperatively (p < .05). The 3D-printing group had better SRS-22 scores than the navigation group 6months after surgery and at the last follow-up (p < .05). Compared with preoperative values, the coronal Cobb angle, local kyphotic Cobb angle, C7-S1 coronal deviation (C7PL-CSVL), and sagittal deviation (SVA) were significantly improved in both groups after surgery (p < .05). Both techniques achieve the purpose of precise screw placement and proper correction of the deformities. In contrast, the 3D-printed guide-assisted screw placement technique showed advantages in terms of operation time, screw placement time, intraoperative blood loss and patient satisfaction with outcomes.

The articular surface technique for lumbar pedicle screw placement: a 3D feasibility study.

Traditional pedicle screws (TPSs) and cortical based trajectory pedicle screws each apply stability with fusions of the lumbar spine and have shown good success. However, the technical considerations of each technique imply complications of loosening and failure that either technique is uniquely prone to having. The current study proposes a new pedicle screw technique through the articular surface of the vertebral superior facet. It is hypothesized that this path will allow utilization of a larger screw that rivals that of the TPS technique, while also maintaining the high-density bone encountered in the cortical based trajectory technique. Retrospective review of 50 consecutive trauma patients that underwent lumbar computed tomography (CT) scans at a Level 1 Trauma Center in the age range 18-45. These scans were uploaded to Brainlab software for ideal starting point and trajectory mapping of pedicle screws coursing through each superior facet and pedicle of vertebral levels L1-S1 without cortical breach. Satisfactory pedicle screw variables consisted of a medial angle <10 degrees, screw length at least 30 mm, screw width at least 5.0 mm, and starting point measurements such as distance to the inferior articular surface and distance to the lateral articular surface. A total of 600 virtual pedicle screws were placed, in which 525 were satisfactory and measured with the above variables. The pedicle widths were shown to significantly widen with lower-level vertebra in the lumbar spine. Approximately 72% of unsuccessful pedicle screws were placed in levels L1 and L2 allowing wider pedicle screws to be placed more further down the vertebral column. The articular surface technique (AST) for pedicle screw placement is a viable alternative in lumbar spinal fusions that offers decreased soft tissue dissection. However, the technique is likely better suited for lower lumbar fusions in L3 to S1.

Obturator inlet and iliac oblique technique for safe, convenient, and reliable iliac screw placement

BackgroundThere are many described techniques for the placement of posterior iliac screws for extension of lumbar posterior spinal instrumentation to the pelvis. However, each one has its limitations. We describe our technique for fluoroscopic guidance of iliac screw placement utilizing the obturator inlet (OI) and iliac oblique (IO) views as well as a detailed review of how to obtain and interpret these views for safe iliac screw placement. MethodsRetrospective chart review of patients undergoing iliac screw placement utilizing the obturator inlet (OI) and iliac oblique (IO) views as part of spine instrumentation between January 2019 and March 2022. Screw length and bony breaches are reported utilizing this technique Results12 patients underwent posterior lumbopelvic fixation with a total of 23 screws placed via either open or percutaneous technique. The mean screw length was 96.5 mm (Range 80 - 110, standard dev 7.75). There were no recorded breaches or recannulation attempts. ConclusionsWe show how this technique is a much more convenient alternative to placement of iliac screws under the obturator outlet oblique (“teardrop” view) which necessitates that the C-arm be in line with instruments being placed. These described views can be used to place screws with either open or percutaneous techniques and with either the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) or S2 alar iliac (S2AI) starting points.