Intensive Care Unit Team Research Articles

Ethical considerations related to virtual visiting for families and critically ill patients in intensive care: a qualitative descriptive study

BackgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, virtual visiting technologies were rapidly integrated into the care offered by intensive care units (ICUs) in the UK and across the globe. Today, these technologies offer a necessary adjunct to in-person visits for those with ICU access limited by geography, work/caregiving commitments, or frailty. However, few empirical studies explore the ethical issues associated with virtual visiting. This study aimed to explore the anticipated or unanticipated ethical issues raised by using virtual visiting in the ICU, such that healthcare professionals can be informed about how to carry out virtual visits ethically, safely and productively.MethodsWe used a descriptive exploratory qualitative research approach recruiting a convenience sample of newly-graduated junior doctors facilitating ICU virtual visits in a tertiary academic centre. Eight newly graduated junior doctors, seven female and one male, aged 23–27, participated in semi-structured interviews. We analysed transcripts using an inductive coding approach.ResultsFive overarching themes emerged. Two of the themes namely, ‘fulfilling a moral instinct to connect families’ and ‘promoting autonomy’, arose from participants’ descriptions of how virtual visits aligned with healthcare standards and practices they considered ethical. Three further themes, ‘preserving dignity and privacy’, ‘managing emotional distress’, and ‘providing equitable access’ to virtual visiting technologies, highlight how virtual visits might exacerbate ethical issues related to family communications.ConclusionVirtual visiting may potentially both ameliorate and exacerbate aspects of ethical healthcare delivery for ICU patients and family members. ICU team members should consider unique ethical considerations related to using virtual visiting. We recommend virtual communications skills training for staff and advocate for the use of easily accessible educational resources for families who wish to visit critically unwell patients remotely.

Who gets the bed: Factors influencing the intensive care exit block - A qualitative study

BackgroundPatient flow problems, including discharge delay and after-hours discharge, have been a consistently major issue, especially for intensive care units (ICUs). Evidence suggests that discharge delay and after-hours discharge are associated with increased ICU and hospital length of stay, leading to worsened patient outcomes and increased healthcare costs. They can also increase ICU readmission and post-ICU mortality. The factors influencing discharge processes are not well elucidated. ObjectiveThis study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators to the ICU patient discharge processes in adult ICUs. MethodsThis qualitative exploratory multisite observational study was conducted in three regional adult ICUs in Queensland, Australia. We used staff interviews, fieldnotes, and document analysis as data collection techniques. Data analysis commenced with a deductive content analysis using the Structure, Process, and Outcomes framework. Following this, an inductive process was taken using the Theoretical Domains Framework. FindingsWe conducted 59 staff interviews and analysed the discharge documents across three sites. Five domains, including context and resources, beliefs about consequences, social/professional role and identity, and behaviour regulation, were strongly related to the factors that influenced the discharge processes. The findings revealed barriers to discharge, including finding the right bed, disconnected and ineffective information systems, ineffective communication and coordination within and across teams and departments, and uncertainty and inconsistency in discharge decision making. Facilitators included clarity on professional roles in ICU discharge, effective communication within the ICU team, and context specific strategies to support the discharge processes. ConclusionsThe findings provide an in-depth understanding of the barriers and facilitators to the ICU discharge processes. Multifaceted strategies should be considered to facilitate and manage ICU discharge safely and efficiently, including the use of clearer discharge criteria and guidelines, digital systems that aid communication and coordination, and early planning of ICU patient discharge.

Clinical trial protocol for continuous glucose monitoring in critical care at Hospital Clinic of Barcelona (CGM-UCI23).

Hyperglycaemia is common in intensive care units (ICUs), with a prevalence of up to 86.2%, increasing mortality. Technology has evolved towards continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and its use in ICUs began especially during the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19). Various studies have evaluated the reliability of CGM, indicating that it is safe for use in critically ill patients. The aim of this study was to compare the use of CGM with point-of-care glucose (POC-G) testing in ICU. Specific objectives include evaluating the glycaemic control, the frequency of POC-G measurements, the incidence of hyperglycaemia, hypoglycaemia and morbidity and mortality at 90 days. An experimental, controlled and randomized clinical trial with a single-blind design will be conducted at Hospital Clinic of Barcelona (HCB). A sample size of 376 participants will be recruited and randomly assigned to two groups: an experimental group, where glycaemic management will be based on CGM; and a control group, where glucose will be managed through POC-G testing, with a blinded CGM. The primary variable considered will be time in range (TIR), with secondary outcomes including, time above range (TAR), time below range (TBR), number of POC-G measurements, incidence of hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia, and mortality. Hypothesis testing will use the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to assess data normality, with appropriate statistical tests applied, considering a p-value <.05. The results obtained will help us understand the impact of CGM on critically ill patients. CGM could potentially reduce the workload of nurses and improve the efficiency of decision-making by the ICU team, enabling early identification and treatment of glucose complications, thereby enhancing safety. Patient safety, a reduction in patient fingerstick and a decreased care burden are the criteria that add value to this research.

Exploring Implementation Processes of a Multicomponent Family Support Intervention in Intensive Care Units (FICUS) Study: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation.

To investigate the experience with and progress of the implementation of a Family Support Intervention (FSI) into adult intensive care units (ICUs) as part of the cluster-randomised FICUS trial. A mixed-methods process evaluation using a multiple case study approach guided by the normalisation process theory. This study took place between June 2022 and July 2023 in eight Swiss ICUs randomised to the intervention arm. A tailored implementation strategy was used to introduce the multicomponent FSI, consisting of a new family nursing role and a family care pathway, into interprofessional ICU teams. Participants were 40 ICU key clinical partners. Qualitative data were collected twice, early (3-6 months) and mid-implementation (9-12 months), using small group interviews. A questionnaire with psychometric measures (Acceptability of Intervention Measure, Feasibility of Intervention Measure, Intervention Appropriateness Measure, Normalisation Measure Development Questionnaire) was administered at mid-implementation. RITA pragmatic rapid thematic analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data. Qualitative and quantitative results were then compared across ICUs (cases). Findings indicated the desired progress of the FSI integration overall and across cases, with high acceptability and appropriateness ratings but only moderate to high feasibility scores. Study-related barriers were noted in all ICUs (i.e., FSI delivery as part of a clinical trial). Implementation barriers included family nurses' limited capacity and clinician's attitudes towards the FSI. Leadership support and interprofessional collaboration were identified as facilitators. Case-based, integrated findings yielded two implementation pathways, namely early and protracted adopters. Implementation barriers were related to the feasibility of FSI delivery within the study context that required a high degree of standardisation and protocol adherence. Implementation progress was shaped by an interprofessional culture of family care, sufficient staff and time resources, and leadership support. The study's findings will inform future implementation of complex health interventions in ICUs. Good reporting of a Mixed-Methods Study (GRAMMS). Within the FICUS trial, a patient and family advisory board with a patient expert, three family members and a patient with own lived experience of critical care collaborate with the research team.

Implementing palliative care in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and mapping of knowledge to the implementation research logic model.

The importance and effectiveness of palliative care (PC) in intensive care units (ICU)are known. Less is known about the implementation and integration of ICU-based PC interventions. This systematic review aims to use a modified implementation research logic model (IRLM) to identify, map, and synthesise evidence on implementation of ICU-PC (primary and/or specialist) interventions. This systematic review used an adapted Smith's IRLM to understand relationships between implementation factors-determinants (barriers and facilitators), strategies, and mechanisms-and report intervention characteristics and outcomes. Searches up to 2nd December 2023, of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, and PsycINFO, combined PC, intensive care, and implementation terms. 84 studies (8 process evaluations, 76 effectiveness studies) were included. Published evidence on ICU-PC interventions issubstantial, but reporting on implementation factors is variable and often lacking, especially for patient and family-related determinants and for all aspects of mechanisms. Main facilitators forimplementation are adequate resources and collaborationbetween PC and ICU teams. Main barriers to implementation are lack of resources, negative perceptions of PC, and high ICU acuity.Implementation strategies include auditing resources, building stakeholder collaboratives, creating adaptable interventions, utilising champions, and supporting education. Mechanisms most commonly worked by facilitating collaborative working. This review provides recommendations for ICUs when designing (stakeholder involvement, ICU-PC collaboration, assessment of culture and resources); implementing (targeted and adapted strategies, champions, and education); and evaluating/reporting (collect effectiveness and implementation data, including mechanisms) ICU-PC interventions. Use of implementation structures and patient/family involvement are both needed and important to be included.

"It's all about setting the stage." The nurse facilitator trial: perceived outcomes and implementation issues. A qualitative study among ICU clinicians and nurse facilitators.

For the first time in France, a randomised controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the impact of a nurse facilitator on family psychological symptoms. We sought to explore the implementation of the intervention, how it was experienced by clinicians, as well as the barriers and facilitators to implementing the change. We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians and facilitators involved in the trial. Interview questions focused on participants' perceptions of the intervention and its outcomes, including the effect of the intervention on patients, families and the health care team, and barriers and facilitators to its implementation. Interviews were conducted by two social science researchers, audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic content analysis. Twenty-three clinicians were interviewed from the five participating ICUs. Three themes emerged, capturing clinicians' perspectives on implementing the intervention: (1) improved communication and enhanced care for families and the ICU team, albeit with some associated risks; (2) active listening and support, both for families and ICU clinicians but with certain limitations; (3) barriers to implementation including lack of organizational readiness, exclusion of under-represented groups, and facilitator challenges including role ambiguity and the need for role support. Participants believed the facilitator intervention potentially improved families' experience. However, they also highlighted emotional difficulties and tensions with some members of the participating teams, due to competing territories and ambiguous role definitions. Facilitators' failure to affect decision-making suggests their role in enhancing goal-concordant care was inadequate within the setting.

CUIDADOS PALIATIVOS NA UNIDADE DE TERAPIA INTENSIVA: VISANDO A EQUIPE MULTIDISCIPLINAR

Palliative care is essential in the intensive care unit (ICU) to promote patient well-being in situations of serious and terminal illness. The multidisciplinary team plays a fundamental role in the implementation of palliative care in the ICU, as each professional has specific skills that contribute to comprehensive patient care. General objective: Explore palliative care in the intensive care unit and its importance for the multidisciplinary team. This study was a literature review in the Scielo and Google Scholar databases with a time frame from 2020 to 2024, using the following keywords: palliative care, nurse, dental surgeon; intensive care unit and multidisciplinary team. This study was a literature review in the Scielo and Google Scholar databases with a time frame from 2020 to 2024, using the following keywords: palliative care, nurse, dental surgeon; intensive care unit and multidisciplinary team. The inclusion criteria used in this literature review were: complete scientific articles published between 2020 and 2024 and available in databases (Google Scholar and Scielo). Duplicate articles published outside the chosen period and which did not address the topic were excluded. Results and discussions: The nurse and the dental surgeon play important roles as members of the multidisciplinary team in the ICU. The nurse is responsible for coordinating care and ensuring the patient's well-being, while the dental surgeon contributes to the prevention and treatment of oral problems that can affect the patient's quality of life. It is concluded that palliative care in the ICU is effective in improving patients' quality of life, but they still face challenges such as lack of knowledge and difficulties in communication.

Nurse Practitioner and Physician Assistant-led Cardiovascular Surgery Postoperative Intensive Care Unit Staffing Model.

To determine whether a nurse practitioner and physician assistant (NP/PA)-led rapid staffing. Model in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit (ICU) can optimize resource utilization without compromising safety or increasing hospital length of stay (LoS). Retrospective observational cohort study comparing before-and-after implementation of an NP/PA-led rapid recovery pathway. A large tertiary referral academic cardiac surgery ICU. There were 116 patients in the prerapid recovery cohort and 153 in the postimplementation rapid recovery phase. Low-risk cardiac surgery patients were selected for postoperative care by an NP/PA-led ICU staffing model. Mean hospital LoS in the prerapid recovery cohort was 5.7 days compared to 5.2 days in the rapid recovery pathway cohort (P = .02). Thirty-day hospital readmission in the prerapid recovery pathway cohort was 7.8% compared with 2.0% in the rapid recovery cohort (P = .04). The ICU readmission rate for prerapid recovery cohort was 4.3%, while the rapid recovery percentage was 2.0% (P = .30). Overall, implementation of an NP/PA-led postcardiac surgical ICU team (rapid recovery pathway) was associated with similar ICU LoS, hospital LoS, ICU readmission rates, 30-day readmission rates, and no significant signal of increased adverse events or safety concerns.

Dysphagia and tracheostomy management in New Zealand intensive care units

ABSTRACT Background: Speech-language therapists (SLTs) hold an important multidisciplinary team (MDT) role in managing swallowing, communication and tracheostomy weaning in intensive care units (ICUs). Yet, many ICUs do not have dedicated SLT time. In this study, we explored New Zealand ICU’s current practices to support benchmarking across the country and against international evidence-based practice. Methods: In part 1, we extracted New Zealand data representing 11 ICU MDTs across all regions from an international survey of 746 ICUs (26 countries). MDTs were asked about their dysphagia practice. In part 2, we conducted a national survey exploring tracheostomy practice in New Zealand. SLTs were asked about perceived roles, knowledge, skills and confidence in tracheostomy. Thirty-five SLTs responded to the survey, again, representing all New Zealand regions. Results: All ICUs had access to a SLT but none had dedicated SLT hours. ICU teams had variable awareness of evidence-based practice in dysphagia care. Swallowing rehabilitation was infrequent. The top two perceived barriers to standardized management of dysphagia were lack of access to SLT and flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) equipment. In part 2, SLTs were experienced and confident but standardized protocols were infrequent and not all practices met current international evidence-based practice. SLTs’ reported barriers to best practice were MDT understanding of role, insufficient ICU-dedicated SLTs, training of nursing, and access to otolaryngology. Conclusions: Skilled, ICU-dedicated SLTs are needed in New Zealand ICUs to support more consistent and evidence-based practice. Access to FEES and time for rehabilitation and MDT education are needed.

Role of the neonatal registered dietitian nutritionist in Canada: A description of staffing and a comparison to practices in the United States.

Neonatal registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) are critical members of the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) team. Ideal RDN staffing levels are unknown. Current staffing levels of neonatal RDNs in Canadian NICUs have not been recently reported. The objective of this study was to describe neonatal RDN staffing and responsibilities in Canada and contrast these findings with those of neonatal RDNs in the United States. An online cross-sectional neonatal RDN survey was performed in the Fall of 2021 to collect hospital-level and individual-RDN-level data. Descriptive statistics were performed to summarize Canadian neonatal RDN staffing levels and responsibilities and compared with US findings. Canadian RDNs reported a median staffing ratio of 25.3 NICU beds per RDN full-time equivalent, with neonatal RDNs reporting a desired 31% increase in staffing. The majority of Canadian NICUs (n = 20/24) reported having a dedicated space to prepare infant feeds away from bedside. Canadian neonatal RDNs reported wanting to expand their responsibilities in research, administration, and education. Canadian neonatal RDNs reported a higher rate of order writing privileges as compared with that of US neonatal RDNs. Canadian neonatal RDNs reported a desired increase in their staffing levels. Neonatal RDNs have the potential to expand their professional role but require additional staffing, dedicated time, and compensation to support this. Further research determining the optimal neonatal RDN staffing ratio to maximize patient outcomes is required.

Implementation of a routine post-shift debriefing program in ICU aiming at quality-of-care improvement: A primary analysis of feasibility and impacts

ObjectivesThis report describes the implementation of a clinical debriefing (CD) program in intensive care units (ICU) and analyses its feasibility and its impact on staff well-being. DesignObservational study. SettingFrom April to September 2023, post-shift CDs were run once a week in 2 out of 7 units in our department, using an adapted version of the DISCOVER-PHASE tool. CD sessions were performed face-to-face with volunteer members of the multidisciplinary ICU team. Main outcome measuresAfter 6 months, a survey assessing the satisfaction of the debriefed teams was conducted. The impact of CD on staff well-being was assessed using three validated questionnaires (Maslach Burnout Inventory, Ways of Coping Checklist, Professional Quality of Life Scale) administered in the 7 units before and after the CD period. ResultsA total of 44 CDs were performed, lasting 15 (4–35) min. There were 6 (1–9) attendees per CD, mainly nurses (64.6%). Discussions focused mainly on basic problems related to dysfunctional material, communication and organization inside the team. The two debriefed teams were satisfied of the program and gave 9, 8 and 8 out of 10 on a visual analogical scale for the climate of confidence of the DC, their organisation, and their ability to improve working conditions and quality of care, respectively. Subscores at the three questionnaires assessing staff well-being before and after the CD period were similar, whether teams experienced CD or not. ConclusionsImplementing of post-shift debriefings in our ICU was feasible and well accepted. More prolonged programs are probably needed to demonstrate benefits on staff well-being. Implications for clinical practiceThis report offers elements that other teams can use to successfully conduct post-shift debriefings and to plan future research on longer-term programs.

“How to navigate this new area”: Intensive care clinicians’ perceptions of voluntary assisted dying in the intensive care unit: A multisite exploratory study

BackgroundThere is growing momentum worldwide for assisted dying. In Australia, voluntary assisted dying may occur in any setting, including an intensive care unit (ICU). As the subject of much debate worldwide, exploring ICU clinicians’ perceptions of assisted dying is essential. AimThe aim of this study was to explore clinicians’ perceptions of and preparedness for voluntary assisted dying in the ICU. MethodAn exploratory qualitative descriptive design using individual interviews was used. Medical, nursing, and allied health clinicians from three ICUs were recruited. Interviews were conducted between Nov 2022 and Jan 2023, with a hypothetical scenario about voluntary assisted dying used to prompt discussion. Interviews were recorded, professionally transcribed, and analysed using inductive content analysis. FindingsICU registered nurses (n = 20), physicians (n = 2), and allied health clinicians (n = 4) participated with interviews lasting 18–45 min (mean: 28 min). Analysis revealed four themes: (i) purpose of ICU reflected that ICU care was not all about saving lives, yet recognising dying and changing priorities was challenging; (ii) dying in the ICU is complex due to difficulties in talking about dying, accepting death as the outcome and evaluating care efficacy; (iii) voluntary assisted dying is a lot of grey because of perceived clinical and ethicolegal challenges; and finally, (iv) respecting choice was about respecting patients' values, beliefs, and autonomy, as well as clinicians’ beliefs and right to exercise autonomy through conscientious objection. ConclusionDying and death are inevitable, and views and perspectives about assisted dying will continue to evolve. Respecting patient choice is at the core of assisted dying, but respecting clinicians’ perspectives and choice is equally important. With voluntary assisted dying now legal in all Australian states, ensuring ICU team and individual clinician preparedness through access to education, resources, and specialist support services is key to raising awareness and easing uncertainty about deaths through voluntary assisted dying.

Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit: The Standard of Care

Intensive care unit–based palliative care has evolved over the past 30 years due to the efforts of clinicians, researchers, and advocates for patient-centered care. Although all critically ill patients inherently have palliative care needs, the path was not linear but rather filled with the challenges of blending the intensive care unit goals of aggressive treatment and cure with the palliative care goals of symptom management and quality of life. Today, palliative care is considered an essential component of high-quality critical care and a core competency of all critical care nurses, advanced practice nurses, and other intensive care unit clinicians. This article provides an overview of the current state of intensive care unit–based palliative care, examines how the barriers to such care have shifted, reviews primary and specialist palliative care, addresses the impact of COVID-19, and presents resources to help nurses and intensive care unit teams achieve optimal outcomes.

Implementation of a palliative care service in a tertiary hospital in a developing country: Methods, strategies and results.

e24056 Background: In Rio de Janeiro, only 11 palliative care facilities exist, creating challenges in meeting the complex needs of patients with metastatic cancer. Our study aims to implement a palliative care service within an existing oncology practice. This approach holds promise as a model that could guide similar practices in low- and middle-income countries, offering a blueprint for the implementation of palliative care services on a broader scale. Methods: This descriptive study spans from February to December 2023, involving the monitoring of 176 patients. Eligible patients met criteria such as a FAST scale for dementia syndrome ≥ 7A, stage IV disease, ranking 5 stroke, terminal organic failure, uncontrolled symptoms, or requiring end-of-life care. The PC team, denoted as “Continued Care”, comprises a medical leader, 3 routine doctors, and 1 nurse. Activities undertaken by the team encompass consults requested by internal medicine and intensive care unit (ICU) teams, outpatient care, continuous education, and daily monitoring of patients with advance care plan (ACP). Results: Among 176 patients initially enrolled, outcomes were completed for 171 patients. Remarkably, 80% of those receiving PC assistance had an ACP in place, with 78% opting for exclusive non-invasive support. The overall death rate was 38%. Notably, among patients enrolled in the PC program, the ICU death rate was 31%. Conclusions: Institutional PC policies associated with the integration of a dedicated team into the hospital's routine, and investments in disseminating knowledge about irreversible illness processes and comfort strategies, emerge as a pivotal component in establishing a comprehensive and integrated model of PC services. This approach appears to surpass the effectiveness of traditional consult or sectorized model, emphasizing the importance of an institutionalized and holistic framework for delivering quality PC.

Complementarity of nutrition screening with Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria for diagnosing malnutrition in critically ill patients: A comparison study of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 and modified Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill Score.

Critical illness induces hypermetabolism and hypercatabolism, increasing nutrition risk (NR). Early NR identification is crucial for improving outcomes. We assessed four nutrition screening tools (NSTs) complementarity with the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria in critically ill patients. We conducted a comparative study using data from a cohort involving five intensive care units (ICUs), screening patients for NR using NRS-2002 and modified-NUTRIC tools, with three cutoffs (≥3, ≥4, ≥5), and malnutrition diagnosed by GLIM criteria. Our outcomes of interest included ICU and in-hospital mortality, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), and ICU readmission. We examined accuracy metrics and complementarity between NSTs and GLIM criteria about clinical outcomes through logistic regression and Cox regression. We established a four-category independent variable: NR(-)/GLIM(-) as the reference, NR(-)/GLIM(+), NR(+)/GLIM(-), and NR(+)/GLIM(+). Of the 377 patients analyzed (median age 64 years [interquartile range: 54-71] and 53.8% male), NR prevalence varied from 87% to 40.6%, whereas 64% presented malnutrition (GLIM criteria). NRS-2002 (score ≥4) showed superior accuracy for GLIM-based malnutrition. Multivariate analysis revealed mNUTRIC(+)/GLIM(+) increased >2 times in the likelihood of ICU and in-hospital mortality, ICU and hospital LOS, and ICU readmission compared with the reference group. No NST exhibited satisfactory complementarity to the GLIM criteria in our study, emphasizing the necessity for comprehensive nutrition assessment for all patients, irrespective of NR status. We recommend using mNUTRIC if the ICU team opts for nutrition screening, as it demonstrated superior prognostic value compared with NRS-2002, and applying GLIM criteria in all patients.

Effectiveness and family experiences of interventions promoting partnerships between families and pediatric and neonatal intensive care units: a mixed methods systematic review.

The objective of this mixed methods review was to examine the effectiveness and family experiences of interventions promoting partnerships between families and the multidisciplinary health care team in pediatric and neonatal intensive care units. Hospitalization of infants and children in neonatal intensive care units and pediatric intensive care units has a significant effect on their families, including increased stress, anxiety, and depression. Available evidence syntheses focused on specific family-centered care, but not on partnership, which is another aspect that may improve families' outcomes and experiences. This review considered studies that focused on effectiveness or family experiences of interventions by health professionals in partnership with families of infants or children hospitalized in an intensive care unit. For the quantitative component of the review, the type of intervention was a partnership between the health care team and the family, and focused on outcomes of stress, anxiety, depression, quality of life, attachment, or satisfaction with family-centered care. For the qualitative component, the phenomenon of interest was family experiences of interventions that included collaboration and partnering with the health care team in the pediatric or neonatal intensive care unit. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies, published from 2000 to August 2022 in English or French, were eligible for inclusion. The JBI methodology for convergent segregated mixed methods systematic reviews was followed using the standardized JBI critical appraisal and data extraction tools. Ten databases were searched in December 2019 and again in August 2022. Study selection, critical appraisal, and data extraction were performed by 2 reviewers independently. Findings of quantitative studies were statistically pooled through meta-analysis and those that could not be pooled were reported narratively. Qualitative studies were pooled through meta-synthesis. This review included 6 qualitative and 42 quantitative studies. The methodological quality varied, and all studies were included regardless of methodological quality. Meta-analyses showed improvements in anxiety, satisfaction with family-centered care, and stress, yet no conclusive effects in attachment and depression. These results should be interpreted with caution due to high heterogeneity. Qualitative analysis resulted in 2 synthesized findings: "Interventions that incorporate partnerships between families and the health care team can improve the family's experience and capacity to care for the child" and "Having a child in intensive care can be an experience of significant impact for families." Integration of quantitative and qualitative evidence revealed some congruence between findings; however, the paucity of qualitative evidence minimized the depth of this integration. Partnership interventions can have a positive impact on parents of children in intensive care units, with improvements reported in stress, anxiety, and satisfaction with family-centered care. PROSPERO CRD42019137834. A Chinese-language version of the abstract of this review is available at http://links.lww.com/SRX/A50 . A French-language version of the abstract of this review is available at http://links.lww.com/SRX/A51 .

Patterns of interactions among ICU interprofessional teams: A prospective patient-shift-level survey approach.

The Awakening, Breathing Coordination, Delirium monitoring and Early mobility bundle (ABCDE) is associated with lower mortality for intensive care unit (ICU) patients. However, efforts to improve ABCDE are variably successful, possibly due to lack of clarity about who are the team members interacting when caring for each patient, each shift. Lack of patient shift-level information regarding who is interacting with whom limits the ability to tailor interventions to the specific ICU team to improve ABCDE. Determine the number and types of individuals (i.e., clinicians and family members) interacting in the care of mechanically ventilated (MV) patients, as reported by the patients' assigned physician, nurse, and respiratory therapist (RT) each shift, using a network science lens. We conducted a prospective, patient-shift-level survey in 2 medical ICUs. For each patient, we surveyed the assigned physician, nurse, and RT each day and night shift about who they interacted with when providing ABCDE for each patient-shift. We determined the number and types of interactions, reported by physicians, nurses, and RTs and day versus night shift. From 1558 surveys from 404 clinicians who cared for 169 patients over 166 shifts (65% response rate), clinicians reported interacting with 2.6 individuals each shift (physicians: 2.65, nurses: 3.33, RTs: 1.86); this was fewer on night shift compared to day shift (1.99 versus 3.02). Most frequent interactions were with the bedside nurse, attending, resident, intern, and RT; family member interactions were reported in less than 1 in 5 surveys (12.2% of physician surveys, 19.7% of nurse surveys, 4.9% of RT surveys). Clinicians reported interacting with 3-4 clinicians each shift, and fewer on nights. Nurses interacted with the most clincians and family members. Interventions targeting shift-level teams, focusing on nurses and family members, may be a way to improve ABCDE delivery and ICU teamwork.

Palliative Care Clinicians' Views on Metrics for Successful Specialist Palliative Care Delivery in the ICU

ContextA quarter of palliative care (PC) clinicians’ consultations are now requested from the intensive care unit (ICU). Despite this high usage, a standardized set of quality metrics for PC delivery in the ICU does not exist. ObjectivesTo explore PC clinicians’ views on how to best measure quality of care delivery in their role as a consultant in the ICU setting. MethodsSecondary analysis of a parent dataset consisting of qualitative data from semi-structured interviews exploring ways to optimize PC clinicians’ role in the ICU. Nineteen participants were recruited across five academic medical centers in the US. Participants included PC physicians (n = 14), nurse practitioners (n = 2), and social workers (n = 3). Thematic analysis with an inductive approach was used to generate themes. ResultsWe identified two central themes: difficulties in measuring PC quality in the ICU (theme 1) and tension between the role of PC and metrics (theme 2). Theme 1 had two subthemes related to logistical challenges in measuring outcomes and PC clinicians’ preference for metrics that incorporate subjective feedback from patients, family members, and the primary ICU team. Theme 2 described how PC clinicians often felt a disconnect between the goal of meeting a metric and their goals in delivering high-quality clinical care. ConclusionOur findings provide insight into PC clinician perspectives on quality metrics and identify major barriers that need to be addressed to successfully implement quality measurement in the ICU setting.

Difficulties and obstacles experienced by intensive care unit nurses during the prevention and care of pressure injuries: A qualitative study

AimThis study aimed to examine the difficulties and obstacles experienced by nurses working in intensive care units during the prevention and care of pressure injuries (ulcers). Materials and methodsA descriptive phenomenological study was designed, involving 13 nurses working in the intensive care unit of a hospital in Turkey. The data were collected through face-to-face interviews. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings were reported according to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies criteria. ResultsThrough the data analysis, an overall theme “Prevention and Care of Pressure Injuries” and three main themes, namely “Obstacles Encountered”, “Impacts on The Nurses”, and “Needs and Recommendations” were identified. ConclusionThis study identified institution-related issues (lack of resources, managers’ attitudes, etc.), as well as lack of knowledge and training prevent the effective management of pressure injuries in intensive care units. The development of pressure injuries emotionally and professionally affects nurses. The primary needs of nurses were found to be equipment and material support, personnel training, positive attitudes of institution managers, and the establishment of a wound care unit within the hospital. The following recommendations were made based on the obtained findings: practical training should be given to all intensive care unit teams based on the latest information, modern, practical, diverse, and sufficient amount of equipment for pressure injuries should be provided, personnel shortage should be eliminated, institution managers should exhibit solution-oriented attitudes toward nurses rather than accusatory approaches, and a wound care unit should be established within the hospital. This study was limited to the nurses working in the ICU of a state hospital in Turkey. Since the study was carried out in a single hospital and due to the personal characteristics of the participants, the findings cannot be generalized to all ICU nurses and healthcare institutions.

Evaluation of the role of an advanced practice dietitian in the intensive care unit

In Swiss intensive care units (ICUs), nutritional management is hardly or not at all supported or supervised by dietitians. Nutritional management in the ICU is mainly performed by ICU nursing staff and intensive care specialists. In 2022, the role of an advanced practice dietitian (APD) was newly defined, created, and implemented in aSwiss ICU as part of apilot project. In contrast to other countries, APDs are still scarce in Switzerland. Evaluation of the APD role is essential to further define the position and adapt it to needs. The aim of this survey was to evaluate the impact of the APD role 8months after implementation. The survey was conducted via online survey in February and March 2023. Atotal of 34members of the ICU team participated, including physicians (n = 11), nurses (n = 20), and speech therapists (n = 3). In addition to workload, years worked in the company, and shiftwork, questions were asked about the level of awareness of the new APD position, integration of the APD into the ICU team, and the impact of the APD on nutritional management and the situation of the participants, as well as regarding documentation and prescribing skills. Adescriptive analysis of the data was carried out in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). The majority are aware of the APD and consider her as part of the ICU team. From the treatment team's point of view, the quality of the nutritional care provided as by the APD has improved and there is added value for patients and the ICU team. The delegated prescribing competence seems to improve nutritional management noticeably and is perceived as helpful and relieving by amajority. How the position will develop in terms of the competence profile remains to be seen.