AbstractThe reactions of [{(η6‐C6H6)RuCl(μ‐Cl)}2] and [{(η6‐p‐cymene)RuCl(μ‐Cl)}2] with N‐[2‐(arylchalcogeno)ethyl]morpholines (L) (aryl = Ph/2‐pyridyl for S, Ph for Se, 4‐MeOC6H4 for Te) and NH4PF6 result in “piano‐stool” complexes of RuII of composition [RuCl(η6‐C6H6)(L)][PF6]/[RuCl(η6‐p‐cymene)(L)][PF6], which give characteristic 1H, 13C{1H}, 77Se{1H}, and 125Te{1H} NMR spectra. Some of them have also been characterized by X‐ray crystallography [Ru–S, Ru–Se, and Ru–Te bond lengths: 2.3815(12)/2.3742(14), 2.4837(14), and 2.6143(7) Å, respectively]. The cyclic voltammograms show that all the complexes undergo irreversible oxidation (E${1 \over 2}$ = 0.290–0.586 V). All the ruthenium complexes have been explored for their catalytic activity in the oxidation of primary and secondary alcohols with N‐methylmorpholine N‐oxide (NMO), tBuOOH, NaOCl, and NaIO4 (TON values upto 9.8 × 104). The efficiency of the catalytic oxidation reaction decreases in the order Te > Se > S. The intermediate species involved in the oxidation reactions appear to incorporate the RuIV=O group.