TCR Antagonism Research Articles

A unique unresponsive CD4+ T cell phenotype post TCR antagonism

The functional outcomes of the T cell’s interaction with the peptide:MHC complex can be dramatically altered by the introduction of a single amino acid substitution. Previous studies have described the varied effects of these altered peptide ligands (APL) on T cell responses. These outcomes of T cell interaction with an APL include the induction of clonal unresponsiveness (anergy) and inhibition of T cell responses (antagonism). The phenotype of peptide-induced anergy, i.e. low proliferation and low IL-2 production, has been extensively described, and a number of groups have demonstrated antagonism. However, the response of T cells to an agonist ligand after encountering an antagonistic stimulus has not been previously characterized. Here, we show that T cells post-antagonism fail to proliferate but produce large quantities of IL-2 upon stimulation with their wild type ligand. This unique phenotype is not due to differences in IL-2 receptor expression or rates of apoptosis, and cannot be overcome by the addition of recombinant IL-2. The response of CD4 T cells to agonist stimulation after encountering an antagonist is a novel phenotype, and is distinct from previously described forms of anergy.

TCR Antagonism by Peptide Requires High TCR Expression

Current models of T cell activation focus on the kinetics of TCR-ligand interactions as the central parameter governing T cell responsiveness. However, these kinetic parameters do not adequately predict all T cell behavior, particularly the response to antagonist ligands. Recent studies have demonstrated that TCR number is a critical parameter influencing the responses of CD4(+) T cells to weak agonist ligands, and receptor density represents an important means of regulating tissue responsiveness in other receptor ligand systems. To systematically address the impact of TCR expression on CD8(+) T cell responses, mAbs to the TCR alpha-chain and T cells expressing two TCR species were used as two different methods to manipulate the number of available TCRs on P14 and OT-I transgenic T cells. Both methods of TCR reduction demonstrated that the efficacy of antagonist peptides was significantly reduced on T cells bearing low numbers of available receptors. In addition, the ability of weak agonists to induce proliferation was critically dependent on the availability of high numbers of TCRs. Therefore, in this report we show that TCR density is a major determinant of CD8(+) T cell reactivity to weak agonist and antagonist ligands but not agonist ligands.

T cell response after TCR antagonism: A unique unresponsive CD4+ T cell phenotype (88.41)

Abstract The outcomes of T cell interaction with ligands of varying potency include the induction of clonal unresponsiveness (anergy) and inhibition of T cell responses (antagonism), among others. The phenotype of peptide-induced anergy has been extensively described, and a number of groups have demonstrated antagonism. However, the phenotype of CD4+ T cells after encountering an antagonistic stimulus has not been previously characterized, despite the fact that several pathogens, including HIV, HCV and malaria, include epitopes that have been defined as T cell antagonists. We demonstrate that post-antagonism, T cells fail to proliferate. However, these cells produce large quantities of IL-2 and express CD25 levels similar to wild type stimulated cells. Our data indicate that antagonized CD4+ T cells fail to respond to IL-2 stimulation, despite the production of this cytokine, as well as expression of its receptor. This response represents a novel phenotype, distinct from all previously described forms of anergy. This research was supported by NIAID (R01 AI056017).

In Vivo Modulation of T Cell Responses and Protective Immunity by TCR Antagonism during Infection

Infectious agents are known to express altered peptide ligands that antagonize T cells in vitro; however, direct evidence of TCR antagonism during infection is still lacking, and its importance in the context of infection remains to be established. In this study, we used a murine model of infection with recombinant Listeria monocytogenes and addressed three issues that are critical for assessing the role of TCR antagonism in the modulation of the immune response. First, we demonstrated that the antagonist peptide efficiently inhibited the ability of the agonist to prime naive TCR-transgenic T cells in vivo. Second, we showed clonal memory T cells were antagonized during recall responses, resulting in loss of protective immunity. Lastly, we observed that even in the context of a polyclonal response, TCR antagonism greatly inhibits the agonist-specific response, leading to altered hierarchy of immunodominance and reduced T cell memory and protective immunity. These results provide direct evidence of clonal TCR antagonism of naive and memory CD8 T cells during infection and demonstrate the effect of TCR antagonism on protective immunity. Thus, agonist/antagonist interactions may play an important role in determining the immunodominance and repertoire of T cell targets, and evaluation of immune responses and vaccine strategies may require examination of not only agonists but also antagonists and their interactions during an infection.

Effector T cells have a lower ligand affinity threshold for activation than naive T cells.

It has been previously established that effector and memory T cells are more sensitive to antigen stimulation than naive T cells. In this study, we compared the effect of ligand affinity on the activation of naive and effector T cells derived from pigeon cytochrome c (PCC)-specific TCR transgenic mice by stimulating these cells with a variety of ligands with widely differing antigenicity. The data obtained indicated the following. (i) The differences in antigen dose requirements for activation of naive and effector cells widened as the affinity of the antigen decreased. Most dramatically, peptides that were TCR antagonists for naive T cells were recognized as agonists by effector T cells. (ii) While both naive and effector T cells were activated by the bacterial superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin A, specific for the transgenic TCR V(beta)3 chain, effector, but not naive, T cells were stimulated to proliferate by toxic shock syndrome toxin-1, a superantigen not previously described to be stimulatory for V(beta)3 T cells. (iii) Effector T cells, but not naive cells, proliferated in response to endogenous self-peptides presented by antigen-presenting cells in a syngeneic mixed lymphocyte reaction. Taken together these data indicate that effector T cells have a lower affinity threshold for activation than naive T cells. Further studies demonstrated that the heightened reactivity of effector T cells to low-affinity ligands declined progressively with repeated stimulations by antigen such that after repeated stimulation effector T cells were no longer stimulated by low-affinity ligands but recognized them as TCR antagonists similar to naive T cells.

Study of the mechanism of TCR antagonism using dual-TCR-expressing T cells.

The mechanism of action of TCR antagonists is incompletely understood. T cells expressing two distinct TCRs have been used to test competition for TCR occupancy as a potential mechanism. Previous studies with CD4 T cells showed that an antagonist for one TCR inhibited the response to the other TCR (cross-antagonism), whereas studies with CD8 cells failed to demonstrate cross-antagonism. To determine whether CD4 and CD8 cells were intrinsically different or whether the differences were the result of the use of different effector assays, we studied both CD4 and CD8 dual-TCR-expressing T cells. In the CD4 system, consistent with previous reports, cross-antagonism of proliferation was observed. In the CD8 system, cross-antagonism was observed using proliferation as readout but not when target cell cytolysis was used. These results suggest that different mechanisms may be involved in the inhibition of proliferation and inhibition of cytotoxic effector function, the latter only involving competition for TCR occupancy. Inhibition of proliferation appears to be more complex and other mechanisms such as sequestration of signaling molecules or negative signaling may be involved. The fact that 10- to 20-fold more antagonist was needed to achieve cross-antagonism compared with inhibition of the cognate TCR is consistent with the hypothesis that competition for TCR occupancy is also a major, albeit not sole, mechanism of antagonism of the proliferative responses of CD4 and CD8 cells.

Could TCR antagonism explain associations between MHC genes and disease?

Alleles of major histocompatibility complex ( MHC) loci are associated with certain types of diseases, including those of infectious and autoimmune origin. MHC products can promote susceptibility or resistance to disease by stimulating or inhibiting immune responses. Recent evidence suggests that MHC-associated peptides derived from self-proteins can act as antagonists of T-cell activation, thereby inhibiting immune responses to antigens. We suggest that self-peptide-promoted antagonism might explain some associations between MHC alleles and particular chronic diseases.

Analysis of TCR antagonism and molecular mimicry of an HLA-A*0201–restricted CTL epitope in primary biliary cirrhosis

Analysis of TCR antagonism and molecular mimicry of an HLA-A*0201–restricted CTL epitope in primary biliary cirrhosis

Analysis of TCR antagonism and molecular mimicry of an HLA-A*0201–restricted CTL epitope in primary biliary cirrhosis

Although the etiology and mechanism of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is unknown, growing evidence suggests a major role for T cells. We have recently identified the first CD8 T-cell epitope, amino acid 159-167 of the E2 component of pyruvate dehydrogenase complexes (PDC-E2). To seek for analogue peptide-antagonizing effector function of CTLs specific for this autoantigen, we examined the effector functions of the PDC-E2-specific CTLs against alanine substituted peptides. Furthermore, because molecular mimicry has been postulated as a possible cause of initiating PBC, we carried out studies aimed at identifying naturally occurring peptides for the 159-167 peptide of PDC-E2 that may serve as agonists. An alanine substitution at position 5 of this epitope significantly reduced peptide-specific effector functions of CTLs. Moreover, this analogue peptide inhibited effector functions of the CTLs to the prototype peptide, including cytotoxicity and IFN-γ production. We also identified a peptide derived from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which showed a higher binding affinity to the HLA-A*0201 than the prototype peptide. This homologous peptide was recognized by CTLs specific for the prototype epitope on PDC-E2. In conclusion, a modification of the immunodominant autoepitope can be utilized to manipulate the CD8 T-cell responses against the autoantigen PDC-E2. Our finding also supports the thesis that molecular mimicry may be implicated in the initiation of the autoreactive CD8 T-cell responses and has implications for the use of such peptides for immunotherapy. (H EPATOLOGY 2002;36:918-926.)

The Src family kinase Fyn mediates signals induced by TCR antagonists.

FcR nonbinding anti-CD3 epsilon mAbs elicit partial TCR signaling that leads to T cell unresponsiveness and tolerance in vivo. In this study, the membrane-proximal events that promote T cell inactivation by FcR nonbinding anti-CD3 mAbs were examined. In the context of FcR nonbinding anti-CD3, TCR complexes did not aggregate and failed to translocate into glycolipid-enriched membrane microdomains. Furthermore, FcR nonbinding anti-CD3 mAbs induced tyrosine phosphorylation of the Fyn substrate Cbl, but not the ZAP-70 substrate linker for activation of T cells. Overexpression of Fyn, but not Lck, restored the mitogenicity of FcR nonbinding anti-CD3 in primary T cells. Taken together, these results suggest that Fyn mediates the partial signaling induced by TCR antagonists.

Inhibition of T Cell Receptor-Coreceptor Interactions by Antagonist Ligands Visualized by Live FRET Imaging of the T-Hybridoma Immunological Synapse

The diverse effects of TCR agonists and antagonists on T cell activation are believed to be modified by the differential recruitment of CD4 or CD8 coreceptors to the TCR-MHCp complex. We used three-dimensional live cell imaging of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between CD3ζ and CD4 fused to variants of the green fluorescent protein to investigate TCR-CD4 interactions during T cell activation. We demonstrate that recognition of agonist MHCp complexes triggers intermolecular interaction between CD4 and TCR, detectable across the T-hybridoma-APC contact area. This interaction is blocked by the presence of antagonist ligands without decreasing the recruitment of ζ and CD4 or preventing their partial colocalization in the immunological synapse.

General T-cell receptor antagonists to immunomodulate HLA-A2–restricted minor histocompatibility antigen HA-1–specific T-cell responses

AbstractT-cell receptors (TCRs) of a series of minor histocompatibility antigen (mHag) HA-1–specific cytotoxic T-cell (CTL) clones isolated from 3 unrelated patients have been shown to use the same BV6S4A2 segment with conserved amino acids in the CDR3Vβ region. This suggests that different HA-1–specific TCRs interact similarly to the HA-1 antigen presented by the HLA-A2 molecule. The mHag HA-1 forms an immunogenic complex with HLA-A2 and induces strong alloimmune responses after stem cell transplantation (SCT). It was questioned, therefore, whether clonal and polyclonal HA-1–specific CTL responses can be antagonized by a single TCR antagonistic peptide. Functional analysis and molecular modeling of single and double amino acid substitutions of TCR contact residues, adjacent residues, and HLA-A2 binding residues resulted in 4 peptides with high affinity for HLA-A2 and with the capacity to inhibit the lysis of endogenously HA-1–expressing EBV-BLCL by 3 different HA-1–specific CTL clones. These peptides also efficiently antagonized HA-1–specific polyclonal CTL lines derived from 3 patients and significantly reduced the number of interferon-γ–producing HA-1–specific CTL of a patient with graft-versus-host disease after HA-1–mismatched SCT. These data show that general TCR antagonists can be developed that inhibit HLA-A2–restricted HA-1–specific CTL responses on the clonal and the polyclonal level and that TCR antagonists may modulate the immunodominant mHag HA-1 responses.

Mechanisms of T cell receptor antagonism: implications in the treatment of disease.

The adaptive immune response is often required for the successful clearing of infectious pathogens. Antigen presenting cells (APC) present peptide antigens derived from pathogens to T cells via major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. T cells then become activated and differentiate into effector cells with the capacity to kill infected cells or to induce an anti-pathogen antibody response. In autoimmunity, this T cell response is directed against self-antigens and often leads to deleterious effects on specific tissues. Likewise, T cell responses to allogeneic MHC molecules in transplants also leads to pathology. By introducing subtle changes in the antigenic peptide amino acid content, T cell activation can be inhibited, thereby preventing T cell effector functions. This strategy of TCR antagonism has been used successfully in vitro and in vivo to inhibit models of autoimmunity and allorecognition. In addition, a variety of pathogens that often result in chronic disease following infection, also have seemingly evolved natural mechanisms to inhibit T cell responses by antagonism. These microorganisms express natural variants of certain proteins, that when presented to T cells have the capacity to specifically inhibit T cell responses by functioning as antagonists or by modulating the nature of the T cell response. The understanding of how pathogens mediate this inhibition in vivo will be beneficial to ongoing studies in both autoimmunity and transplantation aimed at suppressing the harmful immune response, thereby controlling disease. TCR antagonism seems to have the potential to be used therapeutically to prevent or inhibit an undesired T cell response that will ultimately lead to disease.

T cell-mediated antigen presentation: a potential mechanism of infectious tolerance.

Differentiation of the T cell repertoire and the physiology of T cell-mediated antigen presentation are reviewed in relation to mechanisms of self-tolerance. Recent research has indicated that T cell development is a continual process that optimizes partial recognition of self as a homeostatic set-point. Specific T cell antigen recognition of partial agonists is intrinsically linked to expression of class II MHC glycoproteins on T cells. Even ligands that act as TCR antagonists in IL-2 production assays have sufficient agonistic strength to induce expression of class II MHC glycoproteins on T cells. Thus, the intrinsic self-reactivity of the T cell repertoire may promote T-APC activity in vivo and may explain why thymic and peripheral T cells express low but significant levels of class II MHC glycoproteins. T-APC activity induces extensive apoptosis among responder T cells, causes desensitization among surviving responders, and has been implicated in the adoptive transfer of tolerance in the Lewis rat model of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Overall, these findings support a relationship between the partial recognition of self MHC ligands, expression of class II MHC glycoproteins on mature peripheral T cells, tolerogenic T cell-mediated antigen presentation, and desensitization of pathogenic self-reactive T cells.

Galectin-1 induces partial TCR zeta-chain phosphorylation and antagonizes processive TCR signal transduction.

Galectin-1 is an endogenous lectin with known T cell immunoregulatory activity, though the molecular basis by which galectin-1 influences Ag specific T cell responses has not been elucidated. Here, we characterize the ability of galectin-1 to modulate TCR signals and responses by T cells with well defined hierarchies of threshold requirements for signaling distinct functional responses. We demonstrate that galectin-1 antagonizes TCR responses known to require costimulation and processive protein tyrosine phosphorylation, such as IL-2 production, but is permissive for TCR responses that only require partial TCR signals, such as IFN-gamma production, CD69 up-regulation, and apoptosis. Galectin-1 binding alone or together with Ag stimulation induces partial phosphorylation of TCR-zeta and the generation of inhibitory pp21zeta. Galectin-1 antagonizes Ag induced signals and TCR/costimulator dependent lipid raft clustering at the TCR contact site. We propose that galectin-1 functions as a T cell "counterstimulator" to limit required protein segregation and lipid raft reorganization at the TCR contact site and, thus, processive and sustained TCR signal transduction. These findings support the concept that TCR antagonism can arise from the generation of an inhibitory pp21zeta-based TCR signaling complex. Moreover, they demonstrate that TCR antagonism can result from T cell interactions with a ligand other than peptide/MHC.

Altered peptide ligand-mediated TCR antagonism can be modulated by a change in a single amino acid residue within the CDR3 beta of an MHC class I-restricted TCR.

The Ag receptor of cytotoxic CD8+ T lymphocytes recognizes peptides of 8-10 aa bound to MHC class I molecules. This Ag recognition event leads to the activation of the CD8+ lymphocyte and subsequent lysis of the target cell. Altered peptide ligands are analogues derived from the original antigenic peptide that commonly carry amino acid substitutions at TCR contact residues. TCR engagement by these altered peptide ligands usually impairs normal T cell function. Some of these altered peptide ligands (antagonists) are able to specifically antagonize and inhibit T cell activation induced by the wild-type antigenic peptide. Despite significant advances made in understanding TCR antagonism, the molecular interactions between the TCR and the MHC/peptide complex responsible for the inhibitory activity of antagonist peptides remain elusive. To approach this question, we have identified altered peptide ligands derived from the vesicular stomatitis virus peptide (RGYVYQGL) that specifically antagonize an H-2Kb/vesicular stomatitis virus-specific TCR. Furthermore, by site-directed mutagenesis, we altered single amino acid residues of the complementarity-determining region 3 of the beta-chain of this TCR and tested the effect of these point mutations on Ag recognition and TCR antagonism. Here we show that a single amino acid change on the TCR CDR3 beta loop can modulate the TCR-antagonistic properties of an altered peptide ligand. Our results highlight the role of the TCR complementarity-determining region 3 loops for controlling the nature of the T cell response to TCR/altered peptide ligand interactions, including those leading to TCR antagonism.

TCR antagonist peptides induce formation of APC-T cell conjugates and activate a Rac signaling pathway.

T cell receptor antagonists inhibit T cell activation by antigen, and by themselves fail to induce phenotypic changes associated with T cell activation. However, they can induce limited tyrosine phosphorylation of TCRzeta chain. Here we show that TCR antagonists are potent inducers of APC-T cell conjugates, cytoskeletal reorganization, and capping of certain T cell proteins. These events are associated with a signaling pathway involving tyrosine phosphorylation of Vav and SLP-76, activation and capping of Rac-1, a protein previously linked with cytoskeletal reorganization, and activation of JNK. The finding that antagonist peptides stimulate this pathway, while failing to stimulate other TCR-mediated signaling pathways, indicates the presence in T cells of a hierarchy of signaling that is sensitive to the avidity of Ag / MHC-TCR interaction.

Partially phosphorylated T cell receptor zeta molecules can inhibit T cell activation.

The T cell receptor complex (TCR) zeta chain is constitutively tyrosine phosphorylated specifically at two of the six zeta immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) tyrosine residues in resting peripheral T cells. Further phosphorylation of zeta is induced by both agonist and antagonist ligands of the TCR, with agonists inducing complete phosphorylation of the zeta ITAM tyrosines. After antagonist stimulation, zeta phosphorylation is incomplete and generates discrete forms of partially phosphorylated ITAMs. Here, we mutate specific tyrosines in chimeric human CD8-zeta molecules to reflect phosphorylation in resting T cells as well as phosphorylation induced by agonist and antagonist ligands. We demonstrate that such partially phosphorylated TCR-zeta species can inhibit IL-2 production in T cell hybridomas and proliferation in T cell clones. This reveals a previously unrecognized, inhibitory function of partially phosphorylated ITAMs. These findings support the concept that TCR antagonism can arise through the generation of an inhibitory signal within the TCR complex and that constitutive zeta phosphorylation in resting T cells is an inhibitory signaling environment.

Cross-Antagonism of a T Cell Clone Expressing Two Distinct T Cell Receptors

Inhibition of T cell activation can be mediated by analogs of the original antigenic peptide (TCR antagonists). Here, a T cell clone expressing two distinct TCR was used to investigate whether such inhibition involves an active mechanism by examining whether an antagonist for one TCR could influence responses stimulated by the other TCR engaging its agonist. Our results demonstrate functional cross-inhibition under these conditions involving the ability of antagonist:TCR interactions to diminish Lck enzymatic activity associated with the agonist-recognizing second TCR, apparently through enhancement of SHP-1 association with these receptors. Our findings reveal that inhibition of cellular responses by antagonists arises at least in part from active negative regulation of proximal TCR signaling and identify elements of the biochemical process.

Cutting Edge: N-Hydroxy Peptides: A New Class of TCR Antagonists

Abstract TCR antagonists are altered T cell epitopes that specifically inactivate T cells. Commonly, they are derived from agonists by amino acid side chain replacement at positions accessible to the TCR. In this paper we report for the first time that a main chain N-hydroxylation, which is not exposed at the surface of the MHC peptide complex, renders an agonist into an antagonist. These mimotopes are a new, yet undescribed class of TCR antagonists. The antagonists are about 100 times more potent than an unrelated peptide that competes for binding to the MHC molecule. The novel main chain modification enhances biostability and maintains side chain constitution and thus opens new prospects for the use of TCR antagonists in the treatment of pathological immune reactions.