Tax is an important aspect of state revenue, which is then used for development and carrying out state activities. Different countries have different provisions in applying taxes to the public and companies. This condition has implications for different state revenues, so that public services in each country also show differences. On that basis, this article examines various tax provisions in emerging market and developed countries, in an effort to compare the provisions of the two groups of countries. This article uses a literature study from various literatures to examine tax provisions in emerging market countries and developed countries. The search results show that the percentage of taxes in developed countries, such as the United States and Germany is much higher than the percentage of taxes in Indonesia and Malaysia. This has implications for better optimization of public services in developed countries, because the government has sufficient funds. In addition, the existence of social security and health insurance is better in developed countries than in emerging market countries due to the high percentage of taxes. However, this large tax provision also received opposition from the community because it was considered burdensome for workers. References Akhor, S. O., & Ekundayo, O. U. (2016). The impact of indirect tax revenue on economic growth: The Nigeria experience. Igbinedion University Journal of Accounting, 2(08), 62-87. Amirudin & Sudirman. (2012). Perpajakan Pendekatan Teori dan Praktik di Indonesia. Jakarta : Salemba Empat Dua Media. Andries, K., Gallemore, J., & Jacob, M. (2017). The effect of corporate taxation on bank transparency: Evidence from loan loss provisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 63(2-3), 307-328. Apriliana, E. S. (2020). Upaya peningkatan pendapatan nasional di tengah wabah virus corona perspektif ekonomi Islam. Al Iqtishadiyah Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Dan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 6(1), 19-28. Baok, R. T. L., Sasongko, T., & Rifa’i, M. (2020). Strategi Peningkatan Penerimaan Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan (Pbb) di Kota Batu. Reformasi, 10(1), 81-89. Barannyk, L., Dobrovolska, O., Taranenko, V., Koriahinа, T., & Rybalchenko, L. (2021). Personal income tax as a tool for implementing state social policy. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 18(2), 287-297. Basalamah, Anies S. (2004). Perilaku Organisasi Memahami dan Mengelola Aspek Humniora dalam Organisai. Depok : Usaha Kami. Bawazier, F. (2018). Reformasi Pajak di Indonesia Tax Reform In Indonesia. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 8(1), 1-28. Carrillo, P., Pomeranz, D., & Singhal, M. (2017). Dodging the taxman: Firm misreporting and limits to tax enforcement. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9(2), 144-64. Davis, A. K., Guenther, D. A., Krull, L. K., & Williams, B. M. (2016). Do socially responsible firms pay more taxes?. The accounting review, 91(1), 47-68. Demirag, I., Dubnick, M., & Khadaroo, M. I. (2018). A framework for examining accountability and value for money in the UK's private finance initiative. In Corporate Social Responsibility, Accountability and Governance (pp. 77-92). Routledge. Gadenne, L. (2017). Tax me, but spend wisely? Sources of public finance and government accountability. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 274-314. Haryadi, S., & Riani, W. (2018). Metode Penetapan Tarif Pajak Penghasilan Yang Berkeadilan (No. ayg58). Center for Open Science. Kuhltau, C. C. (2002). Teaching The Library Research. USA: Scarecrow Press Inc. Kusuma, A. I. (2016). Pengampunan pajak (tax amnesty) sebagai upaya optimalisasi fungsi pajak. Inovasi, 12(2), 270-280. com. (2021). Industri Daur Ulang Bakal Dapat Pemotongan PPN Jadi 2 Persen. [online]. Diakses dari https://www.liputan6.com/bisnis/read/4601359/industri-daur-ulang-bakal-dapat-pemotongan-ppn-jadi-2-persen Lohonauman, I. L. (2016). Analisis Efektivitas Pemungutan Pajak Daerah Dalam Meningkatkan Pendapatan Asli Daerah Di Kabupaten Sitaro. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 4(1). Lubis, Abu Saman. (2015). “Perbandingan Persentase tax ratio di Indoneisa dengan negara lain”. http://www.bppk.kemenkeu.go.id Mansor, N. A., Mohd Fatzel, F. H., Shamsudin, S. M., & Khair Anwar, I. S. (2019). Zakat versus taxation: an overview of the implementation in Malaysia. Islamic Development Management, 329-337. (2011). Perpajakan. ed. Revisi. Yogyakarta : CV. ANDI OFFSET. Mascagni, G. (2018). From the lab to the field: A review of tax experiments. Journal of Economic Surveys, 32(2), 273-301. Mohamad, A., Radzuan, N., & Hamid, Z. (2017). Tax arrears amongst individual income taxpayers in Malaysia. Journal of Financial Crime. Mulyono, Djoko. (2011). Panduan Brevet Pajak. Andi, Yogyakarta. Nurcaya, I.A.H. (2021). 13 Tahun Menunggu, Industri Daur Ulang Minta Realisasi Insentif. [online]. Diakses dari https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20210309/257/1365668/13-tahun-menunggu-industri-daur-ulang-minta-realisasi-insentif. Perez-Truglia, R., & Troiano, U. (2018). Shaming tax delinquents. Journal of Public Economics, 167, 120-137. Queralt, D. (2019). War, international finance, and fiscal capacity in the long run. International Organization, 73(4), 713-753. Siregar, L. H. (2017). Pengampunan Pajak (Tax Amnesty) Sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Pendapatan Nasional Dari Sektor Fiskal. Hijri, 6(1), 97-105. Winerungan, L. O. (2013). Sosialisasi Perpajakan, Pelayanan Fiskus dan Sanksi Perpajakan terhadap kepatuhan WPOP di KPP Manado dan KPP Blitung. Jurnal EMBA Vol. 1 No 3 September 2013. Yumbi, D. (2018). Impact of taxation laws on small businesses and entrepreneurs: Comparison between USA and Finland.
Read full abstract