SUPPOSE THE EASIEST, AND MOST GLIB, therefore most important answer to the questions Why do have to read? or Why do have to read that? or Why do have to read like that? is, quite simply, you don't: you don't have to read anything, there is no instrumental value in reading in the ways in which we teach, or teach, indeed there may be no pleasure no net result, no learning outcome, no increase in income. And then for the question or larger questions of reading, with this--not so much uselessness or disinterestedness--with this admission in mind, would take on three tangents or angles of attack (as we used to say when was in ground school): the relationship between reading class or labour; reading versus writing the biblical idea of eating the book; the Lacanian/Zizekian idea of interpassivity, or the Subject supposed to read. And this subject supposed to read one might begin with, in terms of class, anecdotally, when was visiting my sister a few years ago and, seeing me with the newspaper open, a friend of hers said, Readin' again, eh?, which has become a sort of mantra around my household since. But really this class notion I'd like to reference with a title of mine, my first collection of poetry from ECW Press in 1997, the Be Labour Reading, a title chose because it seemed to encapsulate neatly (perhaps too neatly) the paradox that difficult writing (and the notion of how easy it is, perhaps to difficult texts), which is to say formally innovative or experimental writing, which is difficult to read, to make sense of or to navigate oneself in, was a kind of writing that obtained its cultural capital at the expense of the reader's economic capital: the texts were belaboured because the reader would be labour (and perhaps the other way around), a condition made all the more tragic or ironic or paradoxical as proceeded to spend the next eleven years being paid to read in the precarious job market of sessional academic labour. And this necessitates saying why am against learning outcomes (because of their instrumentality) why am against being against learning outcomes (because of the elitism of university pedagogy). Here John Guillory's Cultural Capital is useful for how it argues that we must consider postsecondary questions of the canon the syllabus in connection with the secondary school system, a connection with all the more resonance to me because part of what do at SFU is teach graduate courses to high-school teachers returning for an MA in English, but also because of the hierarchies of reading involved in the sessional composition college system--which is to say reading as marking. Then, this connects with a different kind of work as reading, the notion of class, which troubles me because of how it seems as if am saying that a text that is difficult to read will be more off-putting to a working-class reader than to a middle-class reader, which is clearly nonsense. That is, the kind of texts that value, that enjoy reading, those associated, if we are talking about late twentieth early twenty-first century writing, with L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E writing the Kootenay School of Writing (how apropos that ACCUTE the Vancouver Writers' Festival, or the academy the market, both choose to ignore the local--of course, bpNichol Nicole Brossard Steve McCaffery are read--a bit--the canonized 70s) call into question just how reading functions in a globalized, mediatized culture of Empire: Oppositionally, the car became known as him. Without can happen in: plural pushes skips time zones, adds class to voice. This waiting compresses that time, appends archaeology to the afternoon. Metal rattle. So really Sunday is postponed, rendered as retch. A W over the city, spinning for commerce. Jeff Derksen, Solace But to quickly shift gears, if we would rather than read, this is a long-standing desire, of course, one that goes back to the of Revelations, to the famous scene in Chapter lo where St John is confronted with a mighty angel holding a book in his hand--for some reason it seems important that the be little--a mighty angel who spoke with seven thunders in his voice; St John says I was about to (10:4) immediately is told write them not (10:4) but instead to take the little and eat it up; it shall make thy belly bitter, but it shall be in thy mouth sweet as honey (10:9) which indeed it is. …