Two books will be reviewed here, because they, along with several others which have appeared in recent years, illustrate in differing ways the emergence of a new field of social science inquiry among Soviet scholars and may also prefigure certain significant changes in Soviet nationality policy, which has remained largely unchanged since Stalin's time.1 The new field of inquiry is that of ethnosociology ? that is to say, the study of the influence of ethnic factors on sociological variables, such as the structure of the family, social mobility, choice of profession, and others. I will not attempt in this article to assess either book comprehensively or to comment on all of their significant aspects. Rather I will deal in detail with what I consider to be the most significant issues touched and with the reasons why Western scholars concerned either with ethno? sociology or Marxist theory or both should find them important. The later chapters of Bromlei's book, in particular, contain material which is of some interest from the point of view of technical ethnography (in the Soviet sense of the term) and I hope to comment on these matters elsewhere. The book edited by Arutiunian and his associates represents the summation of the first phase of an extensive sociological study, which has been in progress for a number of years, of the population of the autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (Tatar ASSR). Ex? tensive as it is, it is merely one aspect of a broad-gauge investigation of the Soviet rural population which took in, besides the Tatar ASSR, samples from Krasnoiarsk Krai in Eastern Siberia and Kalinin Oblast in the north central portion of European Russia. While this study is not the first in the Soviet Union to use fairly elaborate statistical and computer meth? odology (that honor belongs to the study of Leningrad workers supervised by A.G. Zdravomyslov and his associates),2 it is dis? tinguished from earlier studies by the novel and somewhat sensitive nature of its subject matter, particularly in that portion covered by the volume under review here. Ethnosocio logical research is not common, as far as I know, in the West, and although there has been some discussion of ethnosociological issues in the Soviet ethnographic literature, the methodology used to study them has until recently been traditional and nonquantitative. The volume is divided into an introduction, five lengthy chapters, a brief conclusion, and a methodological and tabular appendix. The chapters deal with the sociological and ethnic structure of the population of the Tatar ASSR and the changes in it (vertical and horizontal mobility, the occupational structure of the urban and rural populations, and so forth), the cultural characteristics of the population ("culture" used here in the sense usual in the Soviet literature to include chiefly the con? sumption of art and ideology and the response to them), family life and daily life-styles, linguistic behavior, and psychological aspects of ethnic relations. The sample studied by Arutiunian and his ^Stephen Dunn is an anthropologist and Co-Director of the Highgate Social Science Research Station, Berkeley, California.
Read full abstract