Task Force Members Research Articles

Dynamics of Perceptions among Self-Employed Business Owners on Tax Collection Models in Tanzania.

Tax compliance issues among self-employed business owners in Tanzania arise from complex and inequitable tax models, exacerbated by inconsistent enforcement and poor policy communication. This study investigates the dynamics of tax collection models in Tanzania, focusing on the perceptions of self-employed business owners across key regions, including Tanga, Dodoma, Arusha, and Mbeya. Drawing on findings from the TAPACO research project, the research employs a mixed-methods approach grounded in pragmatism a philosophy that emphasizes practical solutions. The sample size consists of 150 participants, with data gathered through structured questionnaires and semi-structured interviews representing various sectors within these regions. Entrepreneurial theories such as the Entrepreneurial Orientation (EO) Theory, Resource-Based View (RBV), and Theory of Entrepreneurial Alertness are utilized to frame the analysis of how self-employed business owners perceive tax estimates, bylaws, policies, the regulatory framework, and the tax collection environment. EO Theory explores how entrepreneurs’ risk-taking behaviors and reactivity to changes in the tax environment influence compliance decisions, The RBV examines how entrepreneurs strategically utilize their resources, particularly in making decisions about tax payments and investments in compliance technologies like Electronic Fiscal Devices (EFDs). The findings indicate that self-employed business owners in Tanzania face significant challenges with tax compliance, driven by inaccuracies in tax assessments, corruption within tax enforcement agencies, and a lack of training and infrastructure for adopting Electronic Fiscal Devices (EFDs). These factors, combined with poor communication of tax policies and regulations, have resulted in widespread non-compliance. The study concludes that effective tax compliance strategies must consider the entrepreneurial behaviors influenced by resource availability, risk tolerance, and alertness to regulatory changes. The study recommends strengthening anti-corruption frameworks within tax enforcement agencies, including regular audits, ethical training for task force members, and protections for whistleblowers. Transparency in tax collection operations is essential for rebuilding trust and encouraging voluntary compliance.

Barriers and enablers to a coordinated MHPSS response in Lebanon: A case study of the MHPSS Taskforce

During humanitarian crises, under-resourced and overstretched health systems may not be able to fully meet mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) needs of affected populations, including refugees, internally displaced persons and host communities. Health system governance is vital to humanitarian health response, but there has been little research on this, particularly for MHPSS. We present a case study of a national MHPSS coordination mechanism (the MHPSS Taskforce) in Lebanon, a country which has experienced multiple crises and hosts over 2 million refugees. The aim was to explore the barriers and enablers facing the MHPSS Taskforce in responding to the needs of displaced and host populations in Lebanon. Interviews were conducted with 34 key stakeholders, including Taskforce members, representatives from non-governmental organisations, United Nations agencies, and government Ministries. Our findings show that the positioning of MHPSS within the humanitarian cluster system acts as a barrier to mounting an effective response, with the MHPSS Taskforce sometimes siloed rather than integrated across clusters. Coordination within the Taskforce was reported to be effective in some respects, but limited by a lack of clarity about its decision-making processes, affiliation, mandate, and inclusion of regional perspectives and key groups such as mental health services users in Lebanon. While the technical capacity of the Taskforce is strong, limited funding and staffing were seen to impact its capacity to effectively oversee the MHPSS response in Lebanon. Key recommendations include: the need for stronger mechanisms and operating procedures for interagency and inter-sectoral collaboration on MHPSS within the humanitarian cluster system; greater clarity on the role of the Taskforce and key Taskforce actors, streamlined reporting channels and greater inclusion of diverse perspectives, particularly mental health service users; and greater financial and human resources within coordination mechanisms to support the national MHPSS response in Lebanon.

Imbalanced specialty representation of USMLE and NBME test writers

PurposeThe United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) is an examination series required for allopathic physician licensure in the United States (US). USMLE content is created and maintained by the National Board of Medical Examinations (NBME). The specialty composition of the USMLE and NBME taskforce members involved in the creation of examination content is currently unknown.MethodsUsing the 2021 USMLE and 2021 NBME Committees and Task Forces documents, we determined each member’s board-certified primary specialty and involvement in test material development committees who we dubbed “test writers”. Total active physicians by primary specialty were recorded from the 2020 Physician Specialty Data Report published by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). Descriptive statistics and chi-square analysis were used to analyze the cohorts.ResultsThe USMLE and NBME test writer primary specialty composition was found to be significantly different compared to the US active physician population (USMLE χ2[32] = 172, p < .001 and NBME χ2[32] = 200, p < .001). Only nineteen specialties were represented within USMLE test writers, with three specialties being proportionally represented. Two specialties were represented within NBME test writers. Obstetrics and Gynecology physicians were proportionally represented in USMLE but not within NBME test writers. Internal Medicine (IM) accounts for the largest percentage of all USMLE test writers (60/197, 30%) with an excess representation of 31 individuals.ConclusionsThere is an imbalance in the specialty representation of USMLE and NBME test writers compared to the US active physician population. These findings may have implications for the unbiased and accurate portrayal of topics in such national examinations; thus, future investigation is warranted.

Structured hysteroscopic examination of uterine niches: a modified Delphi procedure.

Uterine niches in the Caesarean section scar are seen in approximately half of women with a history of caesarean delivery. Whilst a structured ultrasound assessment of caesarean defects has been described, there is no consensus on a structured hysteroscopic evaluation. To propose a methodology for a structured hysteroscopic evaluation of uterine niches. We conducted a modified Delphi procedure, including two online rounds and two face-to-face meetings of the members of the ESGE Uterine Niches Working Group. The taskforce members have extensive experience in hysteroscopic niche evaluation. The consensus was predefined as a Rate of Agreement of at least 75%. Thirteen experts participated in this modified Delphi procedure. There was consensus on the need for a standardised methodology and the hysteroscopic definition of a niche as any indentation in the myometrium at the site of a previous CS. There was consensus that a hysteroscopic evaluation of a niche must be combined with ultrasound to measure the residual myometrial thickness. In addition, it was agreed that niches should be subclassified as 'simple', 'simple with one branch', or 'complex'. There was consensus that the following items should be described during a hysteroscopic niche evaluation: the number of niches, the size in relation to the size of cervical canal, the presence of polyps, crypts, cysts, fibrotic tissue, blood, mucus, placental remnants, a dynamic valve, the appearance of the endometrium, the number of blood vessels and bleeding from blood vessels within the defect. Using a modified Delphi procedure with international experts, consensus was achieved on the hysteroscopic evaluation and classification of niches in the uterine caesarean section scar. A structured registration form was developed to aid consistency in hysteroscopic niche reporting.

The year long journey: Transforming the BSN-DNP curriculum

BackgroundRevising a doctor of nursing practice (DNP) curriculum for family nurse practitioner and psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner education with an eye on future changes in competencies required planning and consensus among taskforce members. Major priorities included: the need to embed competency- based education (CBE), the National Taskforce Criteria for Nurse Practitioner (6th ed.) education, and the Essentials: Core competencies for professional nursing education (American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) Essentials, 2021). FindingsChallenges began with faculty knowledge of CBE, NP faculty skills in curriculum building, buying in to the revised degree, and reviewing all current literature on the DNP NP knowledge, skills and attitudes needed for current practice. The year long journey yielded a comprehensive curriculum model to share as well as several lessons learned and recommendations for this journey. ConclusionThe process resulted in a curriculum revision that thus far, is better suited to development of the “work-ready” graduate while still supporting individualized student needs in attending a doctoral-level program. Ongoing work is focused on specific “pillars” of program support including clinical preceptor placement and partnerships, preceptor resources, student retention resources, and exploration of competency-based tracking data management.Considering the impact on faculty workload, program leadership should actively assess levels of curricular expertise of faculty involved to determine additional development or training needs for individual professional growth.

The OHStat Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies and Clinical Trials in Oral Health Research: Explanation and Elaboration.

Adequate and transparent reporting is necessary for critically appraising research. Yet, evidence suggests that the design, conduct, analysis, interpretation, and reporting of oral health research could be greatly improved. Accordingly, the Task Force on Design and Analysis in Oral Health Research-statisticians and trialists from academia and industry-empaneled a group of authors to develop methodological and statistical reporting guidelines identifying the minimum information needed to document and evaluate observational studies and clinical trials in oral health: the OHstat Guidelines. Drafts were circulated to the editors of 85 oral health journals and to Task Force members and sponsors and discussed at a December 2020 workshop attended by 49 researchers. The final version was subsequently approved by the Task Force in September 2021, submitted for journal review in 2022, and revised in 2023. The checklist consists of 48 guidelines: 5 for introductory information, 17 for methods, 13 for statistical analysis, 6 for results, and 7 for interpretation; 7 are specific to clinical trials. Each of these guidelines identifies relevant information, explains its importance, and often describes best practices. The checklist was published in multiple journals. The article was published simultaneously in JDR Clinical and Translational Research, the Journal of the American Dental Association, and the Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Completed checklists should accompany manuscripts submitted for publication to these and other oral health journals to help authors, journal editors, and reviewers verify that the manuscript provides the information necessary to adequately document and evaluate the research.

The OHStat guidelines for reporting observational studies and clinical trials in oral health research: manuscript checklist.

Adequate and transparent reporting is necessary for critically appraising published research, yet ample evidence suggests that the design, conduct, analysis, interpretation, and reporting of oral health research could be greatly improved. Accordingly, the Task Force on Design and Analysis in Oral Health Research, statisticians and trialists from academia and industry, identified the minimum information needed to report and evaluate observational studies and clinical trials in oral health: the OHStat guidelines. Drafts were circulated to the editors of 85 oral health journals and to Task Force members and sponsors and discussed at a December 2020 workshop attended by 49 researchers. The guidelines were subsequently revised by the Task Force writing group. The guidelines draw heavily from the Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials (CONSORT), Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology, and CONSORT harms guidelines, and incorporate the SAMPL guidelines for reporting statistics, the CLIP principles for documenting images, and the GRADE indicating the quality of evidence. The guidelines also recommend reporting estimates in clinically meaningful units using confidence intervals, rather than relying on P values. In addition, OHStat introduces seven new guidelines that concern the text itself, such as checking the congruence between abstract and text, structuring the discussion, and listing conclusions to make them more specific. OHStat does not replace other reporting guidelines; it incorporates those most relevant to dental research into a single document. Manuscripts using the OHStat guidelines will provide more information specific to oral health research.

The OHStat Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies and Clinical Trials in Oral Health Research: Manuscript Checklist

Adequate and transparent reporting is necessary for critically appraising published research. Yet, ample evidence suggests that the design, conduct, analysis, interpretation, and reporting of oral health research could be greatly improved. Accordingly, the Task Force on Design and Analysis in Oral Health Research—statisticians and trialists from academia and industry—identified the minimum information needed to report and evaluate observational studies and clinical trials in oral health: the OHStat Guidelines. Drafts were circulated to the editors of 85 oral health journals and to Task Force members and sponsors and discussed at a December 2020 workshop attended by 49 researchers. The guidelines were subsequently revised by the Task Force’s writing group. The guidelines draw heavily from the Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials (CONSORT), Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE), and CONSORT harms guidelines and incorporate the SAMPL guidelines for reporting statistics, the CLIP principles for documenting images, and the GRADE indicating the quality of evidence. The guidelines also recommend reporting estimates in clinically meaningful units using confidence intervals, rather than relying on P values. In addition, OHStat introduces 7 new guidelines that concern the text itself, such as checking the congruence between abstract and text, structuring the discussion, and listing conclusions to make them more specific. OHStat does not replace other reporting guidelines; it incorporates those most relevant to dental research into a single document. Manuscripts using the OHStat guidelines will provide more information specific to oral health research.

The OHStat Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies and Clinical Trials in Oral Health Research: manuscript checklist

Adequate and transparent reporting is necessary for critically appraising published research. Yet, ample evidence suggests that the design, conduct, analysis, interpretation, and reporting of oral health research could be greatly improved. Accordingly, the Task Force on Design and Analysis in Oral Health Research—statisticians and trialists from academia and industry—identified the minimum information needed to report and evaluate observational studies and clinical trials in oral health: the OHStat Guidelines. Drafts were circulated to the editors of 85 oral health journals and to Task Force members and sponsors and discussed at a December 2020 workshop attended by 49 researchers. The guidelines were subsequently revised by the Task Force’s writing group. The guidelines draw heavily from the Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials (CONSORT), Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE), and CONSORT harms guidelines and incorporate the SAMPL guidelines for reporting statistics, the CLIP principles for documenting images, and the GRADE indicating the quality of evidence. The guidelines also recommend reporting estimates in clinically meaningful units using confidence intervals, rather than relying on P values. In addition, OHStat introduces 7 new guidelines that concern the text itself, such as checking the congruence between abstract and text, structuring the discussion, and listing conclusions to make them more specific. OHStat does not replace other reporting guidelines; it incorporates those most relevant to dental research into a single document. Manuscripts using the OHStat guidelines will provide more information specific to oral health research.

Delayed Diagnosis of a Ligamentous Lisfranc Injury on a Bomber Task Force Member.

The tarsometatarsal joint, or Lisfranc joint, is an extremely important anatomical structure and injury to it has been shown to cause long-term disabling ramifications. With a wide spectrum of injury involvement, from fracture dislocations to sprains, it is important to establish a diagnosis early to guide management. Although the more extreme higher energy fracture dislocations are more widely studied, there remains a paucity of literature on lower energy purely ligamentous injuries, especially among military service members.1 The deployed setting provides an extra layer of complexity in determining a musculoskeletal injury etiology for the provider, especially in resource-limited areas. When a high level of suspicion for Lisfranc injury exists based upon clinical presentation and in the setting of negative X-rays, more prudence should be placed on additional workup. This will guide decision-making for possible expedited stateside return for the patient and better odds of follow-up care. The following case demonstrates a unique scenario of an undiagnosed, purely ligamentous Lisfranc tear in a 23-year-old woman in a deployed environment with late presentation to an orthopedic surgeon stateside. Furthermore, emphasis is placed on factors that led to her delayed diagnosis and how advocating for advanced imaging modalities up-front can expedite care.

The Oral Health Statistics Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies and Clinical Trials in Oral Health Research: Explanation and Elaboration

Adequate and transparent reporting is necessary for critically appraising research. Yet, evidence suggests that the design, conduct, analysis, interpretation, and reporting of oral health research could be greatly improved. Accordingly, the Task Force on Design and Analysis in Oral Health Research-statisticians and trialists from academia and industry-empaneled a group of authors to develop methodological and statistical reporting guidelines identifying the minimum information needed to document and evaluate observational studies and clinical trials in oral health: the Oral Health Statistics Guidelines. Drafts were circulated to the editors of 85 oral health journals and to task force members and sponsors and discussed at a December 2020 workshop attended by 49 researchers. The final version was subsequently approved by the task force in September 2021, submitted for journal review in 2022, and revised in 2023. The checklist consists of 48 guidelines: 5 for introductory information, 17 for methods, 13 for statistical analysis, 6 for results, and 7 for interpretation; 7 are specific to clinical trials. Each of these guidelines identifies relevant information, explains its importance, and often describes best practices. The checklist was published in multiple journals. The article was published simultaneously in JDR Clinical and Translational Research, the Journal of the American Dental Association, and the Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Completed checklists should accompany manuscripts submitted for publication to these and other oral health journals to help authors, journal editors, and reviewers verify that the manuscript provides the information necessary to adequately document and evaluate the research.

The OHStat Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies and Clinical Trials in Oral Health Research: Manuscript Checklist

Adequate and transparent reporting is necessary for critically appraising published research. Yet, ample evidence suggests that the design, conduct, analysis, interpretation, and reporting of oral health research could be greatly improved. Accordingly, the Task Force on Design and Analysis in Oral Health Research—statisticians and trialists from academia and industry—identified the minimum information needed to report and evaluate observational studies and clinical trials in oral health: the OHStat Guidelines. Drafts were circulated to the editors of 85 oral health journals and to Task Force members and sponsors and discussed at a December 2020 workshop attended by 49 researchers. The guidelines were subsequently revised by the Task Force’s writing group. The guidelines draw heavily from the Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials (CONSORT), Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE), and CONSORT harms guidelines and incorporate the SAMPL guidelines for reporting statistics, the CLIP principles for documenting images, and the GRADE indicating the quality of evidence. The guidelines also recommend reporting estimates in clinically meaningful units using confidence intervals, rather than relying on P values. In addition, OHStat introduces 7 new guidelines that concern the text itself, such as checking the congruence between abstract and text, structuring the discussion, and listing conclusions to make them more specific. OHStat does not replace other reporting guidelines; it incorporates those most relevant to dental research into a single document. Manuscripts using the OHStat guidelines will provide more information specific to oral health research.

The Oral Health Statistical Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies and Clinical Trials in Oral Health Research: Manuscript Checklist

Adequate and transparent reporting is necessary for critically appraising published research. Yet, ample evidence suggests that the design, conduct, analysis, interpretation, and reporting of oral health research could be greatly improved. Accordingly, the Task Force on Design and Analysis in Oral Health Research—statisticians and trialists from academia and industry—identified the minimum information needed to report and evaluate observational studies and clinical trials in oral health: the Oral Health Statistical (OHStat) Guidelines. Drafts were circulated to the editors of 85 oral health journals and to Task Force members and sponsors and discussed at a December 2020 workshop attended by 49 researchers. The guidelines were subsequently revised by the Task Force’s writing group. The guidelines draw heavily from the Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials (CONSORT), Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE), and CONSORT harms guidelines and incorporate the SAMPL guidelines for reporting statistics, the CLIP principles for documenting images, and the GRADE indicating the quality of evidence. The guidelines also recommend reporting estimates in clinically meaningful units using confidence intervals, rather than relying on P values. In addition, OHStat introduces 7 new guidelines that concern the text itself, such as checking the congruence between abstract and text, structuring the discussion, and listing conclusions to make them more specific. OHStat does not replace other reporting guidelines; it incorporates those most relevant to dental research into a single document. Manuscripts using the OHStat guidelines will provide more information specific to oral health research.

The role of social capital in the task force for preventing and handling sexual violence on campus

Higher education institutions are required to establish a Task Force for the Prevention and Handling of Sexual Violence (PPKS). The presence of the PPKS Task Force within the campus requires thorough preparation so that its existence can be accepted and beneficial. Therefore, this research aims to examine how social capital is utilized by PPKS Task Force to strengthen its presence. The concept of social capital in organizational management is used for analysis. Using a qualitative approach, data collection was conducted through interviews with the chairperson and members of PPKS Task Force in three campuses where the PPKS Task Force has been established for more than 6 months. The research findings indicate the existence of bonding social capital through the reinforcement of vision, mission, and shared perceptions among Task Force members, which serves as an initial step before engaging in other activities. Additionally, there is bridging social capital through trust and support from the campus’s internal stakeholders and related parties directly associated with the campus. Another crucial aspect is linking social capital through collaboration with external parties and various entities capable of providing support for PPKS Task Force activities and tasks.

Nothing About Us Without Us: Improving Representation of Disability in Medical School Curriculum Through Explicit Inclusion.

Medical school curricula across the United States fail to adequately prepare students to provide high-quality care to and advocate for patients with disabilities. To address this shortcoming at one large, urban medical school, the Curriculum Committee at Sidney Kimmel Medical College (SKMC) formed a taskforce of students and faculty to evaluate the degree and quality of disability representation in its undergraduate medical education (UME) curriculum. Taskforce members solicited input from five community members in various fields of disability advocacy to craft recommendations that reflected this community's vision for disability education in UME. Community partners suggested areas of focus including clinical skills, accessibility of healthcare facilities, awareness of intersectionality with other identities, acknowledgment of bias, and respect for the patient's autonomy via their "right to risk." The taskforce report to the Curriculum Committee included 9 recommendations for curricular revision based on community partner suggestions, 6 of which were accepted and are being implemented into the curricular content for the class of 2026 and beyond. This novel approach to implementing curricular change could encourage other medical schools to evaluate their own curricula through the lens of disability and prompt curricular revision with the input of community partners with disabilities, students, and, faculty.

Pragmatic Choice of Diction and Deictic Elements in Select Covid-19 Media Discourse in Nigeria

Recent scholarly works on Covid-19 media discourse and medical discourse have only focused on the use of neologisms within the context of the Covid-19 pandemic and language use that investigates communication and exchange of shared background knowledge as important factors between doctors and their patients. This paper investigates the pragmatic choice of words and the various contexts in which deictic elements have been employed by members of Nigeria's Presidential Task Force on Covid-19 to convey meaning with the public. As a pragmatic study, attention is given to the mood aspect, using Halliday's Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) to elicit the potential motivations behind the pragmatic choice of words of the speakers. This paper analyses a total of 92 utterances from four speeches of the Nigeria's Presidential Task Force on Covid-19 members delivered at one of their live telecast press briefings on Tuesday, 27th April 2020, were taped and transcribed for analysis. The utterances were analysed with antconc software, which provided a frequency tally of the specific deictic elements used in the speeches. The findings of this study on the one hand, indicate that speakers at the press briefing used person deixis such as I, We, and Us in both inclusive and exclusive contexts to demonstrate pity for the public and to pragmatically connect with the public as if both the speech producers and the public are engaged in a serious battle against Covid-19. On the other hand, our grammatical analysis revealed the use of military diction, leading the researcher to conclude that the members of the Nigerian Presidential Task Force on Covid-19 assume State authority for themselves.

Increasing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Urology Residency Recruitment: Recommendations From the Society of Women in Urology

ObjectiveTo provide a framework for diversifying the urologic workforce through residency recruitment by integrating principles of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) into program mission and values, application review, and interview process. Materials and MethodsFor this narrative review, the Society of Women in Urology Advancing DEI in Urology Residency Recruitment Task Force identified four areas for incorporating DEI into residency recruitment: defining a residency program’s mission and values, holistic application review, an objective interview process, and implementing DEI principles into a program. Using PubMed and Google Scholar, we performed a non-systematic literature search of articles from January 2014 through January 2024. Search terms included combinations of “diversity”, “equity”, “inclusion”, “residency”, “holistic review”, “applications”, “interviews”, and “initiatives”. Additional resources were identified through citations of selected articles. Based on findings from these articles, Task Force members made recommendations for best practices. ResultsThe diversity of practicing urologists is disproportionate to that of the United States population. Emerging evidence demonstrates that DEI efforts in healthcare are associated with better outcomes and reduction in healthcare inequities. We offer strategies for residency programs to integrate DEI initiatives into their recruitment, application review, and interview process. Furthermore, we address extending DEI principles into a program’s mission and culture to create an inclusive environment conducive to training and supporting individuals from unique backgrounds. ConclusionIt is critical to recruit and retain diverse talent into urology to improve patient care. We urge residency programs and their supporting institutions to adopt DEI principles into their recruitment efforts.

A Mixed-Methods Evaluation to Inform the Hawai'i Suicide Prevention Strategic Plan.

The Prevent Suicide Hawai'i Taskforce is a state, public, and private partnership of individuals, organizations, and community groups that leads statewide suicide prevention efforts in Hawai'i. The purpose of this evaluation was to identify the progress and barriers of the Taskforce to inform the upcoming 2025 Hawai'i Suicide Prevention Strategic Plan in the following areas: Hope, Help, Heal, Research and Evaluation, and Policy and Advocacy. Utilizing a sequential exploratory mixed-methods approach, 18 key informants were interviewed, followed by a 13-question survey sent to the Taskforce member listserv. Results were analyzed using qualitative coding techniques and descriptive statistics. Interview findings contained six themes: importance of community relationships, interconnection of suicide prevention efforts, progress in diversifying training, organizational challenges, adaptations to the COVID-19 pandemic, and funding challenges. Of the 34 survey respondents, most were involved in the area of Hope (91%). The respondents reported the area with most progress was Hope (87%), and the most important area to address was Help (41%). The majority (82%) of the respondents characterized the level of Taskforce communication as Excellent or Good. Interview and survey data corroborated each other and revealed new insights about the successes and barriers of the Taskforce and their progress in implementing the Strategic Plan. Recommendations included advocating for long-term funding for suicide prevention and building community relationships.

Upaya Pencegahan dan Penanganan Masalah Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang Ditinjau dari Perda Kota Kupang Nomor 3 Tahun 2019 tentang Pencegahan dan Penanganan Masalah Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang

The purpose of this research is to analyze the efforts to prevent and handle the problem of human trafficking in review of kupang city regional regulation number 3 of 2019 concerning the prevention and handling of the problem of human trafficking. This research is an empirical juridical research method. The result of this research is that the Government and the Task Force on Human Trafficking have made various efforts in preventing and handling the problem of Human Trafficking in Kupang City by referring to Kupang City Regional Regulation Number 3 of 2019 and in the process of preventing and handling the problem of Human Trafficking in Kupang City there are several obstacles. The conclusion of this research is that the efforts to prevent and handle the problem of trafficking in persons carried out by the Kupang City Government and the Task Force for Trafficking in Persons have not been fully implemented in accordance with Kupang City Regional Regulation Number 3 of 2019, namely not implementing Administrative Control of Population Mutation and Migration, Control of Labor Placement, and Early Detection. Constraints experienced: a. Suboptimal Inter-Agency Coordination; b. Allocation of Meeting Time between Task Force Members is not optimal; c. Lack of Socialization at the Central and Regional Stakeholder Levels; d. Human Resources (HR) are Still Low. Inadequate Human Resources (HR); and e. Misuse of Technology and Information. The first suggestion is that the Kupang City Government and the Trafficking in Persons Task Force should implement activities to prevent and handle the problem of trafficking in persons in accordance with Kupang City Regional Regulation No. 3/2019 in full, namely by implementing activities to control the administration of population mutation and migration, control labor placement, and early detection. The second suggestion is that the Kupang City Government and the Human Trafficking Task Force should increase the number of inter-agency coordination meetings to unify the vision and mission of the Task Force in combating human trafficking.

Psychosocial intervention programme based on the needs of women undergoing termination of pregnancy for foetal anomalies: A modified Delphi study.

To construct a psychosocial intervention programme for women diagnosed with foetal anomalies based on their needs in China. A three round-modified Delphi survey from September to November 2020. In Round 1, based on literature review and qualitative interviews, a face-to-face meeting with eight taskforce members was conducted to generate the initial intervention indicators. In Round 2 and 3, 15 experts and three stakeholders (women undergoing termination of pregnancy for foetal anomalies) were invited by email to evaluate the importance of the indicators and built the final psychosocial intervention programme. The response rate for both two rounds is 100%. The experts' authority coefficient was 0.86. The Kendall W value of the two rounds ranged between 0.191 and 0.339. A needs-based psychosocial intervention programme was established, including four periods (denial, confirmation, decision-making and recovery), three needs-based supports (information, social and acceptance commitment therapy) and 27 intervention indicators. The mean value of the importance of each index was 4.00-5.00. Further research is required to evaluate whether this programme is realistic and effective for the target audiences.